FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list

Back to Politics

Fuck Business

Jump to newest

By *oo hot OP Couple
over a year ago

North West

Daily Telegraph reporting that our glorious Foreign Secretary (For the benefit of Brexiters - that would be Boris Johnson) was non too enamoured with talk of big business worrying about post Brexit job losses.

At a Foreign Office reception celebrating the Queens birthday last week, Boris was asked about his thoughts regarding big business making statements about their Brexit fears. “Fuck Business” Johnson was reported to have said by sources close to the Daily Telegraph.

Odd really that big business has always been at the heart of the British Conservative Party and both Thatcher and Major were arch supporters of the private business sector.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *avidnsa69Man
over a year ago

Essex

"Daily Telegraph reporting that our glorious Foreign Secretary (For the benefit of Brexiters - that would be Boris Johnson) was non too enamoured with talk of big business worrying about post Brexit job losses.

At a Foreign Office reception celebrating the Queens birthday last week, Boris was asked about his thoughts regarding big business making statements about their Brexit fears. “Fuck Business” Johnson was reported to have said by sources close to the Daily Telegraph.

Odd really that big business has always been at the heart of the British Conservative Party and both Thatcher and Major were arch supporters of the private business sector.

"

And Thatcher was a huge supporter of the single market.....Boris is a fat, bumbling cretin

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rench letterCouple
over a year ago

Chorley,

Yeah, very true could have not put it better my self. Boris should have been sacked long ago. I thought they were a party for businesses.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rench letterCouple
over a year ago

Chorley,

Cretin is to good a word for him.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *athy1Couple
over a year ago

bournemouth

The bloke is a fat wanker clueless brainless and as you say should have been given the boot months ago

Hi won’t stop untill he gets the pm job that will be the biggest disaster ever

Shame he doesn’t run into the Thames and never surface again

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *avidnsa69Man
over a year ago

Essex

"Yeah, very true could have not put it better my self. Boris should have been sacked long ago. I thought they were a party for businesses. "

Boris is only interested in Boris......

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock

"Yeah, very true could have not put it better my self. Boris should have been sacked long ago. I thought they were a party for businesses. "

I think unlike the Liberal Democrats the Conservative party is a party of democracy first, business 2nd, and that the Conservative party are respecting the result of the referendum.

Funny really that the Liberal democrats have the word 'Democrats' in their party name but have shown themselves to be the least willing to accept the democratic result of the referendum. The Lib dems are not even worthy of their own party name.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *urve BallWoman
over a year ago

North London

"Yeah, very true could have not put it better my self. Boris should have been sacked long ago. I thought they were a party for businesses.

I think unlike the Liberal Democrats the Conservative party is a party of democracy first, business 2nd, and that the Conservative party are respecting the result of the referendum.

Funny really that the Liberal democrats have the word 'Democrats' in their party name but have shown themselves to be the least willing to accept the democratic result of the referendum. The Lib dems are not even worthy of their own party name. "

In case you haven't realised, democracy wasn't outlawed the day after the referendum. People voted then democratically and they can do so again. Democratically.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *urve BallWoman
over a year ago

North London

"Daily Telegraph reporting that our glorious Foreign Secretary (For the benefit of Brexiters - that would be Boris Johnson) was non too enamoured with talk of big business worrying about post Brexit job losses.

At a Foreign Office reception celebrating the Queens birthday last week, Boris was asked about his thoughts regarding big business making statements about their Brexit fears. “Fuck Business” Johnson was reported to have said by sources close to the Daily Telegraph.

Odd really that big business has always been at the heart of the British Conservative Party and both Thatcher and Major were arch supporters of the private business sector.

"

Do you know what? At first, after his initial attempts for backseat driving, I thought he was just trying to indirectly oust TM and get her job. But, after all his continued interviews, articles, secret recordings etc, it's becoming more and more clear that what he, in fact, wants, is to undermine TM to such an extent, that she appears weaker and weaker, resulting to the EU playing hardball and her having to walk away because of it. He wants a no deal Brexit and he's trying to achieve it in the most cowardly way. There's no other explanation as to why he'd say all these things publicly and not in their cabinet meetings. He knows that the EU are following our media and he's using them to do their work for him.

I'd have throttled him if I was TM. I bet she's got a little Boris voodoo doll and keeps sticking pins to it to get it out of her system, since she can't send him packing!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rench letterCouple
over a year ago

Chorley,

Is this the Tory party or oh I think it's the monster raving looney party. There was a vote but a lied leave campaign.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rench letterCouple
over a year ago

Chorley,

Think Cretin Boris seems like he just wants to wind the EU up. Then they will get a bad deal which then that what they want to happen which will to a know deal. It's what these thick headed Brexiters want.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

"Think Cretin Boris seems like he just wants to wind the EU up. Then they will get a bad deal which then that what they want to happen which will to a know deal. It's what these thick headed Brexiters want. "

Yep.

Fact is disaster economics benefit the super rich. BoJo is a puppet and tool of the super rich. The rest of us mean nothing to him of them, we are mainly game pieces to be manipulated for their gain.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Think Cretin Boris seems like he just wants to wind the EU up. Then they will get a bad deal which then that what they want to happen which will to a know deal. It's what these thick headed Brexiters want.

Yep.

Fact is disaster economics benefit the super rich. BoJo is a puppet and tool of the super rich. The rest of us mean nothing to him of them, we are mainly game pieces to be manipulated for their gain."

Lol. Which way did you vote?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *avidnsa69Man
over a year ago

Essex

"Yeah, very true could have not put it better my self. Boris should have been sacked long ago. I thought they were a party for businesses.

I think unlike the Liberal Democrats the Conservative party is a party of democracy first, business 2nd, and that the Conservative party are respecting the result of the referendum.

Funny really that the Liberal democrats have the word 'Democrats' in their party name but have shown themselves to be the least willing to accept the democratic result of the referendum. The Lib dems are not even worthy of their own party name. "

You have a weird view of democracy....dissent is allowed in democracies. Or are you arguing that we should become a totalitarian state now?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

"

Lol. Which way did you vote?"

Sometimes you have to support that which you hate to achieve your ultimate goal.

But when you do so it is advisable to let all know what you are doing when you do it (regardless of ridicule) so that all know your ultimate aim.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"

Lol. Which way did you vote?

Sometimes you have to support that which you hate to achieve your ultimate goal.

But when you do so it is advisable to let all know what you are doing when you do it (regardless of ridicule) so that all know your ultimate aim."

Whatever. True socialists like Michael Foot would be proud of you anyway ??

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Yeah, very true could have not put it better my self. Boris should have been sacked long ago. I thought they were a party for businesses.

I think unlike the Liberal Democrats the Conservative party is a party of democracy first, business 2nd, and that the Conservative party are respecting the result of the referendum.

Funny really that the Liberal democrats have the word 'Democrats' in their party name but have shown themselves to be the least willing to accept the democratic result of the referendum. The Lib dems are not even worthy of their own party name.

You have a weird view of democracy....dissent is allowed in democracies. Or are you arguing that we should become a totalitarian state now?"

Dissent is good . Being lying bastards isn’t

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rMrsWestMidsCouple
over a year ago

Dudley

"

Lol. Which way did you vote?

Sometimes you have to support that which you hate to achieve your ultimate goal.

But when you do so it is advisable to let all know what you are doing when you do it (regardless of ridicule) so that all know your ultimate aim."

Wasn't your ultimate goal to see the country on it's knees and everyone destitute so you could see the end of the conservative party! Very noble!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock

"

Lol. Which way did you vote?

Sometimes you have to support that which you hate to achieve your ultimate goal.

But when you do so it is advisable to let all know what you are doing when you do it (regardless of ridicule) so that all know your ultimate aim.

Whatever. True socialists like Michael Foot would be proud of you anyway ??"

Yep, and Tony Benn.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

"Yeah, very true could have not put it better my self. Boris should have been sacked long ago. I thought they were a party for businesses. "

Boris Johnson is a party for Boris Johnson. Anything that makes his life difficult and "fuck 'em".

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

It's clear that Boris isn't someone who can be trusted, nor is he particularly good at his work. He's consistently worked against the Prime Minister and the country and should not be allowed positions of such responsibilities and trust. The Brexit folk should despise him as much as anyone - he has no principles and but for coming from a privileged background, would be a loser. Perhaps as sociopathic as the American one with bad hair.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes Boris is for Boris.....He has no political convictions and anyone who thinks he truly believes in Brexit is mistaken.......He believed that if we voted to remain Cameron would still be PM ...But if we voted to leave Cameron would resign and he would be the obvious successor ... That so nearly worked out till he was outflanked by Gove....Then along came Theresa who took his prize as he saw it ..He has been working against her since day one......Oh and against our national interest as well...He is a dangerous individual , Time for him to be reigned in .He is a buffoon of a man .but one who has conned sections of the Tory party

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

I think it was more machiavellian than that.

Remember, he had written two articles to announce his position - one arguing for stay, the other for leave.

He was, I think, expecting a narrow win for stay.

But by backing leave, he reckoned it would give him the lead among Tory members, the majority of whom also wanted leave.

It backfired spectacularly when leave won. He didn't have a clue what to do next.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *tace 309TV/TS
over a year ago

durham

"It's clear that Boris isn't someone who can be trusted, nor is he particularly good at his work. He's consistently worked against the Prime Minister and the country and should not be allowed positions of such responsibilities and trust. The Brexit folk should despise him as much as anyone - he has no principles and but for coming from a privileged background, would be a loser. Perhaps as sociopathic as the American one with bad hair."
its not just Boris .I wouldn't trust one single MP.they all tell big porkies

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

"It's clear that Boris isn't someone who can be trusted, nor is he particularly good at his work. He's consistently worked against the Prime Minister and the country and should not be allowed positions of such responsibilities and trust. The Brexit folk should despise him as much as anyone - he has no principles and but for coming from a privileged background, would be a loser. Perhaps as sociopathic as the American one with bad hair.its not just Boris .I wouldn't trust one single MP.they all tell big porkies "

There are some though who are on the more unhealthy ends of psychological spectra, boris being a prime example. May's also rather unhealthy.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It's clear that Boris isn't someone who can be trusted, nor is he particularly good at his work. He's consistently worked against the Prime Minister and the country and should not be allowed positions of such responsibilities and trust. The Brexit folk should despise him as much as anyone - he has no principles and but for coming from a privileged background, would be a loser. Perhaps as sociopathic as the American one with bad hair.its not just Boris .I wouldn't trust one single MP.they all tell big porkies

There are some though who are on the more unhealthy ends of psychological spectra, boris being a prime example. May's also rather unhealthy."

And Corbyn is the biggest liar and he knows it. If he wasn’t he would never get anywhere near being elected. I really find it hard to believe that so many people are so gullible

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It's clear that Boris isn't someone who can be trusted, nor is he particularly good at his work. He's consistently worked against the Prime Minister and the country and should not be allowed positions of such responsibilities and trust. The Brexit folk should despise him as much as anyone - he has no principles and but for coming from a privileged background, would be a loser. Perhaps as sociopathic as the American one with bad hair.its not just Boris .I wouldn't trust one single MP.they all tell big porkies

There are some though who are on the more unhealthy ends of psychological spectra, boris being a prime example. May's also rather unhealthy."

Oh yes I totally agree .Really untrustworthy and the sort of people you would need to wash your hands after shaking hands .

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why am I the only who is against democracy?

You are all illustrating how ridiculous it is in practice. A highly paid ego soothing popularity contest is bound to attract the sociapathic and chronically self interested.

As politics is now just a dirty game of backstabbing and grandstanding it can't possibly attract the caring, all round stand up people that should be conducting it and if it does they tend to get disillusioned or corrupted themselves.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Why am I the only who is against democracy?

You are all illustrating how ridiculous it is in practice. A highly paid ego soothing popularity contest is bound to attract the sociapathic and chronically self interested.

As politics is now just a dirty game of backstabbing and grandstanding it can't possibly attract the caring, all round stand up people that should be conducting it and if it does they tend to get disillusioned or corrupted themselves. "

You are not the only one.

The people who run the EU believe in plutocracy

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Why am I the only who is against democracy?

You are all illustrating how ridiculous it is in practice. A highly paid ego soothing popularity contest is bound to attract the sociapathic and chronically self interested.

As politics is now just a dirty game of backstabbing and grandstanding it can't possibly attract the caring, all round stand up people that should be conducting it and if it does they tend to get disillusioned or corrupted themselves. "

I would rather live a technocracy than a democracy but the transition from a democracy to a meritocracy or whatever utopia you envision usually involves bloodshed.Which is problematic

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Democracy results in bloodshed nonstop.

Change has to happen. Think big. Don't be a pussy.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Democracy results in bloodshed nonstop.

Change has to happen. Think big. Don't be a pussy."
to be replaced with ?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Democracy results in bloodshed nonstop.

Change has to happen. Think big. Don't be a pussy.to be replaced with ? "

You have to qualify to vote. Prove your knowledge of the matter and the best and worst cases consequences of each choice before the ballot.

Esteemed experts having greater voting strength. Decision making quality is tracked over time and voting strength upgraded or downgraded accordingly.

Longer tenure for politicians based on performance not popularity. They get there by strong merit in personality and intelligence testing. Best people for the job...not the craftiest.

Get rid of ideologically grounded parties and the groupthink that goes with them.

Too many arm chair experts who's sum total of knowledge about a decision is what the tabloids spun them. They pollute the vote and lead us into lost generations of political failure and inaction.

Voting is mostly emotional and probably comes down to who has the most likeable face on a poster half the time. IT ISNT WORKING

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *urve BallWoman
over a year ago

North London

"Democracy results in bloodshed nonstop.

Change has to happen. Think big. Don't be a pussy.to be replaced with ?

You have to qualify to vote. Prove your knowledge of the matter and the best and worst cases consequences of each choice before the ballot.

Esteemed experts having greater voting strength. Decision making quality is tracked over time and voting strength upgraded or downgraded accordingly.

Longer tenure for politicians based on performance not popularity. They get there by strong merit in personality and intelligence testing. Best people for the job...not the craftiest.

Get rid of ideologically grounded parties and the groupthink that goes with them.

Too many arm chair experts who's sum total of knowledge about a decision is what the tabloids spun them. They pollute the vote and lead us into lost generations of political failure and inaction.

Voting is mostly emotional and probably comes down to who has the most likeable face on a poster half the time. IT ISNT WORKING

"

Do you know what? I probably agree with you. However...! It sounds good in theory, yes, but how do you implement it in practice? Plus, those who want it bad enough, they'll find plenty of ways to abuse the system. Same as they abuse everything they touch now.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Democracy results in bloodshed nonstop.

Change has to happen. Think big. Don't be a pussy.to be replaced with ?

You have to qualify to vote. Prove your knowledge of the matter and the best and worst cases consequences of each choice before the ballot.

Esteemed experts having greater voting strength. Decision making quality is tracked over time and voting strength upgraded or downgraded accordingly.

Longer tenure for politicians based on performance not popularity. They get there by strong merit in personality and intelligence testing. Best people for the job...not the craftiest.

Get rid of ideologically grounded parties and the groupthink that goes with them.

Too many arm chair experts who's sum total of knowledge about a decision is what the tabloids spun them. They pollute the vote and lead us into lost generations of political failure and inaction.

Voting is mostly emotional and probably comes down to who has the most likeable face on a poster half the time. IT ISNT WORKING

Do you know what? I probably agree with you. However...! It sounds good in theory, yes, but how do you implement it in practice? Plus, those who want it bad enough, they'll find plenty of ways to abuse the system. Same as they abuse everything they touch now."

What's the worst that can happen?!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Let me guess. Those who would like something different from democracy. Not been on the winning sides lately have you?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Let me guess. Those who would like something different from democracy. Not been on the winning sides lately have you?

"

Are you talking about me?

We are all on the losing side...I'm not talking about Brexit or trump...I'm talking about the ability to gets things done and the ability to act in the best interests of all citizens equally.

The current system harbours corruption and misleading of the populace into acting against their best interests.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Daily Telegraph reporting that our glorious Foreign Secretary (For the benefit of Brexiters - that would be Boris Johnson) was non too enamoured with talk of big business worrying about post Brexit job losses.

At a Foreign Office reception celebrating the Queens birthday last week, Boris was asked about his thoughts regarding big business making statements about their Brexit fears. “Fuck Business” Johnson was reported to have said by sources close to the Daily Telegraph.

Odd really that big business has always been at the heart of the British Conservative Party and both Thatcher and Major were arch supporters of the private business sector.

And Thatcher was a huge supporter of the single market.....Boris is a fat, bumbling cretin"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Let me guess. Those who would like something different from democracy. Not been on the winning sides lately have you?

Are you talking about me?

We are all on the losing side...I'm not talking about Brexit or trump...I'm talking about the ability to gets things done and the ability to act in the best interests of all citizens equally.

The current system harbours corruption and misleading of the populace into acting against their best interests. "

So in whose interests would these successful intelligent people be acting?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sorry missed the bit where you said benefit all citizens equally. But that is a fantasy, you cannot benefit everyone equally

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Sorry missed the bit where you said benefit all citizens equally. But that is a fantasy, you cannot benefit everyone equally "

You can and should provide equality of opportunity not equity of outcome (that's definitely not what I meant).

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Sorry missed the bit where you said benefit all citizens equally. But that is a fantasy, you cannot benefit everyone equally

You can and should provide equality of opportunity not equity of outcome (that's definitely not what I meant).

"

Don’t we already have that?

And wouldn’t a meritocracy be completely contrary to that?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's not a pure meritocracy of society...just of the decision making process of governance.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There's some work to be done for people trapped in a generational poverty spiral but otherwise yes there is equality of outcome already.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Do you really think career politicians and those elites who were born to rule will give up power .

Do the public want experts running the show."Expert" is a dirty word today.People want personality over intellect.

A meritocracy will on come after a huge violent upheaval or a cataclysmic event.

We are stuck with populism and the cult of personality in the western world and it will be our undoing and maybe only at the precipice we will change.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Sorry missed the bit where you said benefit all citizens equally. But that is a fantasy, you cannot benefit everyone equally

You can and should provide equality of opportunity not equity of outcome (that's definitely not what I meant).

Don’t we already have that?

And wouldn’t a meritocracy be completely contrary to that?"

Wait. We already had that ? Sounds suspiciously like sovereignty...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rench letterCouple
over a year ago

Chorley,

See the NHS is making preperations for a no deal Brexit and most of the medicines come from the EU.

These that voted for brexit going to ruin this country.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham

"See the NHS is making preperations for a no deal Brexit and most of the medicines come from the EU.

These that voted for brexit going to ruin this country.

"

Most or some?

Do you know what the percentage is?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *urve BallWoman
over a year ago

North London

"See the NHS is making preperations for a no deal Brexit and most of the medicines come from the EU.

These that voted for brexit going to ruin this country.

Most or some?

Do you know what the percentage is?"

37 million packs per month. Regardless of percentage, I'd say that's significant. In addition, there's medical equipment in the mix, not just medicines.

Anyway, I'm sure that Trump will help us with that one too. What was it he said again?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

At the moment fulfilling the wishes of the people is the job of the government which is above big business very noble in my view.

As for Boris he is a clown and should not be in the government and neither should Gove who should be burned at the stake

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

2 years on from the vote to leave with 6 negotiating weeks left before the October EU leaders meeting which is the deadline, the maybot will have a meeting on Friday with her cabinet to agree what the UK wants in the leaving deal. Which will then be published in a white paper. Presented to parliament. Have its 1st and 2nd reading, go through the committee stage, then return to the house for its final reading and be made law. As required by the EU in order for the EU to offer any kind of deal to the UK.

Anyone spotted the flying pigs?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

"

Odd really that big business has always been at the heart of the British Conservative Party and both Thatcher and Major were arch supporters of the private business sector.

"

Jeremy Hunt, interviewed in the Evening Standard about a hard brexit, yesterday:

“There would not just be economic consequences for the UK, there would be profound economic consequences for the rest of Europe.

“Probably the City, as the financier of European business, is the central point to make here. If it became harder for European businesses to access finance, that is far from trivial.

“The City itself would find a way to thrive, whatever the outcome of the Brexit negotiations.

“If it became a low-tax, low-regulation, offshoot fully outside the EU, it would find a way to thrive in those circumstances. But for European businesses the impact would be profound.”

He says this to threaten the EU to agree a deal, yet there will be plenty who see this not as threat but an opportunity.

More than half the Cabinet has the City on their CV and more than half the funding of the Conservative Party election campaign comes from the same quarter.

It is the political wing of the City of London.

Ten years after an unchecked City of London almost consumed itself with its own greed, and wreaked havoc for the rest of us, the Conservative Party is preparing the ground to transfer control from Whitehall to the Square Mile.

Low tax, of course, almost means few or no public services. Hardly surprising from the politician who co-authored a policy paper calling for the NHS to be scrapped.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

"Jeremy Hunt, interviewed in the Evening Standard about a hard brexit, yesterday:

“There would not just be economic consequences for the UK, there would be profound economic consequences for the rest of Europe.

“Probably the City, as the financier of European business, is the central point to make here. If it became harder for European businesses to access finance, that is far from trivial.

“The City itself would find a way to thrive, whatever the outcome of the Brexit negotiations.

“If it became a low-tax, low-regulation, offshoot fully outside the EU, it would find a way to thrive in those circumstances. But for European businesses the impact would be profound.”

He says this to threaten the EU to agree a deal, yet there will be plenty who see this not as threat but an opportunity.

More than half the Cabinet has the City on their CV and more than half the funding of the Conservative Party election campaign comes from the same quarter.

It is the political wing of the City of London.

Ten years after an unchecked City of London almost consumed itself with its own greed, and wreaked havoc for the rest of us, the Conservative Party is preparing the ground to transfer control from Whitehall to the Square Mile.

Low tax, of course, almost means few or no public services. Hardly surprising from the politician who co-authored a policy paper calling for the NHS to be scrapped.

"

Yep...

The plan is to turn the UK into Liechtenstein. The only problem with that is Liechtenstein has a population of less than 38000 people not 55+million. So maybe a better example of offshoring the UK could be found looking west, maybe Bermuda where 20% of the population live below the poverty line. Everyone looking forward to to the Cunts plan to see millions of people homeless so the city can keep making money for its multimillionaire masters?

Or am I now going to be told I am using hyperbole again?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Jeremy Hunt, interviewed in the Evening Standard about a hard brexit, yesterday:

“There would not just be economic consequences for the UK, there would be profound economic consequences for the rest of Europe.

“Probably the City, as the financier of European business, is the central point to make here. If it became harder for European businesses to access finance, that is far from trivial.

“The City itself would find a way to thrive, whatever the outcome of the Brexit negotiations.

“If it became a low-tax, low-regulation, offshoot fully outside the EU, it would find a way to thrive in those circumstances. But for European businesses the impact would be profound.”

He says this to threaten the EU to agree a deal, yet there will be plenty who see this not as threat but an opportunity.

More than half the Cabinet has the City on their CV and more than half the funding of the Conservative Party election campaign comes from the same quarter.

It is the political wing of the City of London.

Ten years after an unchecked City of London almost consumed itself with its own greed, and wreaked havoc for the rest of us, the Conservative Party is preparing the ground to transfer control from Whitehall to the Square Mile.

Low tax, of course, almost means few or no public services. Hardly surprising from the politician who co-authored a policy paper calling for the NHS to be scrapped.

Yep...

The plan is to turn the UK into Liechtenstein. The only problem with that is Liechtenstein has a population of less than 38000 people not 55+million. So maybe a better example of offshoring the UK could be found looking west, maybe Bermuda where 20% of the population live below the poverty line. Everyone looking forward to to the Cunts plan to see millions of people homeless so the city can keep making money for its multimillionaire masters?

Or am I now going to be told I am using hyperbole again?"

No, you're going to be asked this:

Why did you vote Leave if you knew Brexit would turn Britain into an offshore tax haven?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

"No, you're going to be asked this:

Why did you vote Leave if you knew Brexit would turn Britain into an offshore tax haven?"

Answered on multiple occasions. The fact that you (and others) fallback position when I point out the reality of what you support and have supported for years is to ask why I voted out is telling.

How many times and in how many ways do I have to tell you I got fed up of trying to make you and those like you see how your a turkey voting for Christmas and decided to give you what you wished for?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *riefcase_WankerMan
over a year ago

Milton Keynes

"Yeah, very true could have not put it better my self. Boris should have been sacked long ago. I thought they were a party for businesses.

I think unlike the Liberal Democrats the Conservative party is a party of democracy first, business 2nd, and that the Conservative party are respecting the result of the referendum.

Funny really that the Liberal democrats have the word 'Democrats' in their party name but have shown themselves to be the least willing to accept the democratic result of the referendum. The Lib dems are not even worthy of their own party name.

You have a weird view of democracy....dissent is allowed in democracies. Or are you arguing that we should become a totalitarian state now?

Dissent is good . Being lying bastards isn’t "

If you don't like lying bastards, you're gonna have a torrid time trying to pick who to vote for...Lord Buckethead maybe?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *riefcase_WankerMan
over a year ago

Milton Keynes

"I think it was more machiavellian than that.

Remember, he had written two articles to announce his position - one arguing for stay, the other for leave.

He was, I think, expecting a narrow win for stay.

But by backing leave, he reckoned it would give him the lead among Tory members, the majority of whom also wanted leave.

It backfired spectacularly when leave won. He didn't have a clue what to do next.

"

Absolutely. He completely shit the bed. The press conference the next day he looked like a rabbit in the headlights

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *riefcase_WankerMan
over a year ago

Milton Keynes

"Why am I the only who is against democracy?

You are all illustrating how ridiculous it is in practice. A highly paid ego soothing popularity contest is bound to attract the sociapathic and chronically self interested.

As politics is now just a dirty game of backstabbing and grandstanding it can't possibly attract the caring, all round stand up people that should be conducting it and if it does they tend to get disillusioned or corrupted themselves.

I would rather live a technocracy than a democracy but the transition from a democracy to a meritocracy or whatever utopia you envision usually involves bloodshed.Which is problematic "

Unfortunately, we actually live in a kakistocracy

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock

"I think it was more machiavellian than that.

Remember, he had written two articles to announce his position - one arguing for stay, the other for leave.

He was, I think, expecting a narrow win for stay.

But by backing leave, he reckoned it would give him the lead among Tory members, the majority of whom also wanted leave.

It backfired spectacularly when leave won. He didn't have a clue what to do next.

Absolutely. He completely shit the bed. The press conference the next day he looked like a rabbit in the headlights"

At least he looked sober. George Osborne on the other hand looked like he had spent a heavy night on the drink without any sleep, at his morning press conference.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I think it was more machiavellian than that.

Remember, he had written two articles to announce his position - one arguing for stay, the other for leave.

He was, I think, expecting a narrow win for stay.

But by backing leave, he reckoned it would give him the lead among Tory members, the majority of whom also wanted leave.

It backfired spectacularly when leave won. He didn't have a clue what to do next.

Absolutely. He completely shit the bed. The press conference the next day he looked like a rabbit in the headlights"
wasnt the remain article meant to be a stream of consciousness rather than a fully blown article. Almost as if he was testing the rationale for remaining. Easy would have been proud.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *riefcase_WankerMan
over a year ago

Milton Keynes

"I think it was more machiavellian than that.

Remember, he had written two articles to announce his position - one arguing for stay, the other for leave.

He was, I think, expecting a narrow win for stay.

But by backing leave, he reckoned it would give him the lead among Tory members, the majority of whom also wanted leave.

It backfired spectacularly when leave won. He didn't have a clue what to do next.

Absolutely. He completely shit the bed. The press conference the next day he looked like a rabbit in the headlights

At least he looked sober. George Osborne on the other hand looked like he had spent a heavy night on the drink without any sleep, at his morning press conference.

"

It'll never beat the PMQ's where he looked like he'd double-dropped a couple of Gary's and was absolutely munted!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread

back to top