FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Gun Control

Jump to newest
 

By *LCC OP   Couple
over a year ago

Cambridge

Do you think that UK style gun control would work in the US?

The UK banned handguns* but there weren't that many in the first place, and the majority were in the hands of the law abiding citizens, it was uncommon for them to be in the hands of criminals even before the ban.

The same for centre fired semi auto rifles, the UK has never had the gun culture of the UK. Most people didnt grow up shooting or hunting, so a much lower number of gun owners as a percentage of the population.

The US on the other hand has a big gun culture, a large military which regularly handles firearms, same for security guards, police forces, and of course regular civilians who simply want to own a gun.

So with this in mind, would a UK style ban and collection of guns work to solve America's gun crisis, or are there simply too many guns out there now in the US for that to work?

(*There are exceptions)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby

Far to many guns in the US for that to work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

There were a lot more full bore weapons in legal circulation in the UK prior to Hungerford than many realise. The ban removed many of them (it included my left handed, UK spec FN SLR and Lee Enfield L42A1 [personal property bought for competition shooting while in the forces]) as well as 2 small bore target rifles. Fact is as a result of my loss of a firearms licence 4 weapons were removed form circulation and that was 4 less that criminals could get hold of through violent home invasions (which is the way many firearms find their way into criminal hands).

The USA may be starting with a much higher initial number of arms in circulation but the fact is removing legal firearms from circulation reduces the potential for them to become illegal firearms and will eventually (over time) reduce deaths from illegal firearms use to the world average. Doing nothing just exacerbates the problem.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago

North West


"Far to many guns in the US for that to work "

This is true. Also need to take on board the crazy American mindset that is fertilised by paranoia and the money that is behind the small arms manufacturers and gun lobby.

Doing nothing is not an option (if you are sensible) but actually achieving something would be akin to dragging concrete blocks single handedly up a muddy mountain side.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There were a lot more full bore weapons in legal circulation in the UK prior to Hungerford than many realise. The ban removed many of them (it included my left handed, UK spec FN SLR and Lee Enfield L42A1 [personal property bought for competition shooting while in the forces]) as well as 2 small bore target rifles. Fact is as a result of my loss of a firearms licence 4 weapons were removed form circulation and that was 4 less that criminals could get hold of through violent home invasions (which is the way many firearms find their way into criminal hands).

The USA may be starting with a much higher initial number of arms in circulation but the fact is removing legal firearms from circulation reduces the potential for them to become illegal firearms and will eventually (over time) reduce deaths from illegal firearms use to the world average. Doing nothing just exacerbates the problem. "

Michael Ryan's A 47 was legal .

I believe it was adapted to semi automatic only .

He had a hand gun aswell , not sure if this was legal or not .

He was in a Gun Club .

Fortunately his A 47 Jammed a few times enabling one at least to escape maybe more .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you think that UK style gun control would work in the US?

The UK banned handguns* but there weren't that many in the first place, and the majority were in the hands of the law abiding citizens, it was uncommon for them to be in the hands of criminals even before the ban.

The same for centre fired semi auto rifles, the UK has never had the gun culture of the UK. Most people didnt grow up shooting or hunting, so a much lower number of gun owners as a percentage of the population.

The US on the other hand has a big gun culture, a large military which regularly handles firearms, same for security guards, police forces, and of course regular civilians who simply want to own a gun.

So with this in mind, would a UK style ban and collection of guns work to solve America's gun crisis, or are there simply too many guns out there now in the US for that to work?

(*There are exceptions) "

Better to try it and fail and not try at all !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ykmwyldTV/TS
over a year ago

Belpre

Speaking as a US citizen. Even disregarding that the freedom is in our Constitution. The gun culture, and the mind set of gun owners, has risen to the point that banning guns would never work here. There would be more people that would die just trying to take the guns away than all the shootings we've ever had combined. It would most likely cause a very bloody civil war here, collapsing our economy, and thus the economy of the rest of the world as well. I'm a firm believer that certain new restrictions and laws could be enforced to help keep guns away from most of the people that just have no business having access to them. The trouble is, the people that are in power, because of wealth or politics, profit from not having the new restrictions and laws passed and enforced. So, because of these facts, and others, I can say

with 99% certainty, taking guns away from the US people isn't a viable option, so it will never

happen here. Heck, just the shear civilian firepower of the people in the five states of Pennsylvania, West Virginia,, Virginia, Tennessee, and Kentucky alone, thats tens of millions of guns, registered and unregistered, including millions of high military spec guns of every caliber, and tens of billions of rounds of ammunition. That's only 10% of the states in the US. Those five states could overwhelm many militaries in the world with that kind of civilian firepower. A vast majority of these people learned to handle guns from a Very young age, under 10 years old. Invasion of the US mainland by a foreign power, sure wouldn't be an intelligent choice for any government or dictator

to make. Not that I have any ill feelings against the Japanese people, because I don't in any way, and I'm happy they are our allies, but the Pearl Harbor bombing by the Japanese Navy planes on December 7th 1941, and just the possibility of

a west coast mainland invasion in everyones thoughts, changed the mindset of an entire nation, probably for many many generations to come. Millions of US citizens legally carry concealed handguns everyday. I can safely say, because I live in a rural country setting, there is probably at least a thousand civilian guns within a three mile radius of my home. The American saying, "They can have my gun when they pry it from my cold dead hands", is not a joke, and shouldn't be thought as such. These people are

deadly serious, and more than willing to prove it

to any authority, State or Federal, that wishes to

test them by trying to enforce a gun ban law. The very best anyone can hope for is smarter restrictions that these gun owners agree with and

will accept, anything beyond that isn't happening in our children's lifetime.

Sorry for my long winded reply on this topic.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top