FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

This Tory government are nuts

Jump to newest
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Chief executive of Porton Down research laboratory has said scientists have not been able to prove the Novichok nerve agent used to poison Sergei and Yulia Skripal came from Russia or establish its country of origin

Anyone think the Tories and Boris Johnson will say sorry for lying

On 29/03/18 he said Porton Down lab was “absolutely categorical” the nerve agent was Russian

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Mind you this Tory government are all about spin to take the heat off their brexit mess they are causing

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes I heard this on 6pm news, all channels are reporting this

.

but then we all suspected this long before the news broke out

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

Look at the official statements, the speeches.

Every one repeated the same term, that the substance was "of a type developed in Russia".

Of a type developed in Russia.

How many hours of argument did No. 10 staff have with Porton Down before agreeing the form of words they could use?

The formula for the substance used in Salisbury was invented by the USSR. That's it. That's all Porton Down ever said.

I could be cynical and say Russia is not the same territory as the USSR, but it suited political ends to conflate the two.

And if Porton Down knew the formula, who else knew, too?

Still, between some Russia-bashing and Corbyn-bashing, it's been a good few weeks for May and takes the spotlight away from the Brexit shambles.

Does No. 10 have a new spin doctor at work?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Look at the official statements, the speeches.

Every one repeated the same term, that the substance was "of a type developed in Russia".

Of a type developed in Russia.

How many hours of argument did No. 10 staff have with Porton Down before agreeing the form of words they could use?

The formula for the substance used in Salisbury was invented by the USSR. That's it. That's all Porton Down ever said.

I could be cynical and say Russia is not the same territory as the USSR, but it suited political ends to conflate the two.

And if Porton Down knew the formula, who else knew, too?

Still, between some Russia-bashing and Corbyn-bashing, it's been a good few weeks for May and takes the spotlight away from the Brexit shambles.

Does No. 10 have a new spin doctor at work?

"

Waiting for the "Weapons of mass destruction" speech?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

It surely this is a resignation issue for BorisJohnson as the UK's chief diplomat on a matter so serious and Theresa May for backing him up and blaming the Russians without any evidence

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

So who do you think recreated this Russian nerve agent to kill a Russian spy on British soil like Litvinyenko and Mark of?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

Cui bono?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"So who do you think recreated this Russian nerve agent to kill a Russian spy on British soil like Litvinyenko and Mark of? "

Could have been anyone

The fact is the Tories have lied

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

I don't know the answer to your question.

That's one for the police. Or it ought to be.

Our politicians, however, decided to become judge and jury.

Grenfell - let's not jump to conclusions, let's wait for an inquiry to establish the facts.

Salisbury - it was the Russians wot done it!

No evidence has been presented, other than an assertion the chemical was "of a type developed in Russia".

From that phrase an entire narrative has been played out.

The Russian authorities may or may not be responsible, directly or indirectly.

I prefer detective work when it follows the evidence.

What we have here is a conlusion - and no doubt some people desperately seeking the evidence now to substantiate it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Look at the official statements, the speeches.

Every one repeated the same term, that the substance was "of a type developed in Russia".

Of a type developed in Russia.

How many hours of argument did No. 10 staff have with Porton Down before agreeing the form of words they could use?

The formula for the substance used in Salisbury was invented by the USSR. That's it. That's all Porton Down ever said.

I could be cynical and say Russia is not the same territory as the USSR, but it suited political ends to conflate the two.

And if Porton Down knew the formula, who else knew, too?

Still, between some Russia-bashing and Corbyn-bashing, it's been a good few weeks for May and takes the spotlight away from the Brexit shambles.

Does No. 10 have a new spin doctor at work?

"

yes indeed

Donald Trump is sitting relaxed thinking, that god these terrible people from fab have stopped talking about me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So who do you think recreated this Russian nerve agent to kill a Russian spy on British soil like Litvinyenko and Mark of?

Could have been anyone

The fact is the Tories have lied "

Perhaps these terrible Tories have much more inside information than we from fab do

.

just perhaps

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"So who do you think recreated this Russian nerve agent to kill a Russian spy on British soil like Litvinyenko and Mark of?

Could have been anyone

The fact is the Tories have lied "

Could it have been anyone? Who has the ability to create top end nerve agents? Start thinking about that, and will start to narrow down your list of subjects.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"I don't know the answer to your question.

That's one for the police. Or it ought to be.

Our politicians, however, decided to become judge and jury.

Grenfell - let's not jump to conclusions, let's wait for an inquiry to establish the facts.

Salisbury - it was the Russians wot done it!

No evidence has been presented, other than an assertion the chemical was "of a type developed in Russia".

From that phrase an entire narrative has been played out.

The Russian authorities may or may not be responsible, directly or indirectly.

I prefer detective work when it follows the evidence.

What we have here is a conlusion - and no doubt some people desperately seeking the evidence now to substantiate it.

"

When Police are trying to solve a crime one of the first things they do is look for motive and who has motive to commit the crime. Who other than Putin and Russia would have had motive to kill one of their former spies who defected to work for the UK?

Police also look at who is most likely suspect based on previous form. Russia has previous form for this with the murder of Alexander Litvinenko and others. The poison used in this attack is also a poison that was invented and developed by Russia. Some people may call this circumstantial evidence but who else could possibly be in the frame? Who else has previous form and who else has motive?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

He also said "It is our job to provide the scientific evidence of what this particular nerve agent is - we identified that it is from this particular family and that it is a military grade, but it is not our job to say where it was manufactured."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"So who do you think recreated this Russian nerve agent to kill a Russian spy on British soil like Litvinyenko and Mark of?

Could have been anyone

The fact is the Tories have lied

Could it have been anyone? Who has the ability to create top end nerve agents? Start thinking about that, and will start to narrow down your list of subjects. "

Have you got you or anyone got any evidence ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"So who do you think recreated this Russian nerve agent to kill a Russian spy on British soil like Litvinyenko and Mark of?

Could have been anyone

The fact is the Tories have lied

Could it have been anyone? Who has the ability to create top end nerve agents? Start thinking about that, and will start to narrow down your list of subjects.

Have you got you or anyone got any evidence ?"

What kind of evidence are you talking about? What the substance was? Yes, they have found traces of it, and identified it as novichok. A nerve agent developed by the Russians. It has been used to kill a Russian double agent. Who benefits from that, and who has the ability to manufacture it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East


"

Who other than Putin and Russia would have had motive to kill one of their former spies who defected to work for the UK? "

I can think of at least 300 people with a serious grudge.

All of whom were outed to foreign intelligence services in exchange for an envelope stuffed with $100,000.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"

Who other than Putin and Russia would have had motive to kill one of their former spies who defected to work for the UK?

I can think of at least 300 people with a serious grudge.

All of whom were outed to foreign intelligence services in exchange for an envelope stuffed with $100,000.

"

Do they have access to high end nerve agents?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"

Who other than Putin and Russia would have had motive to kill one of their former spies who defected to work for the UK?

I can think of at least 300 people with a serious grudge.

All of whom were outed to foreign intelligence services in exchange for an envelope stuffed with $100,000.

"

Alot of people playing judge and jury without any evidence of who it was

Could it have been Russia maybe but thrn again could have been anyone

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

Who other than Putin and Russia would have had motive to kill one of their former spies who defected to work for the UK?

I can think of at least 300 people with a serious grudge.

All of whom were outed to foreign intelligence services in exchange for an envelope stuffed with $100,000.

Alot of people playing judge and jury without any evidence of who it was

Could it have been Russia maybe but thrn again could have been anyone..... with access to high end nerve agents

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

everyone must admit the assassin did get in and out very well, that is indeed if there ever was one

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

CLCC for a Labour man you sure as hell love defending the Tories alot lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Remember CLCC you deal in evidence based things so have you any evidence that it was 100% Russia ? If you do get to your local cop shop

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"CLCC for a Labour man you sure as hell love defending the Tories alot lol "

If a Tory said tomorrow was Wednesday you would disagree with them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Chief executive of Porton Down research laboratory has said scientists have not been able to prove the Novichok nerve agent used to poison Sergei and Yulia Skripal came from Russia or establish its country of origin

Anyone think the Tories and Boris Johnson will say sorry for lying

On 29/03/18 he said Porton Down lab was “absolutely categorical” the nerve agent was Russian"

From what I can gather the Porton Down "evidence" makes up only a part of the over all picture, that and MI5 / MI6 & GCHQ combined quite possibly makes the picture much more evident.

The other 3 agencies do not make public press conferences disclosing their evidence and methods for obvious reasons so to make a sweeping judgement on just one section of evidence is not painting anything near a full body of guilt or innocence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham

Once again, the OP has twisted and taken out of context.

Porton Down was never going to say where the Novichok was manufactured, and was only ever going to confirm the type. This was clearly stated by Gary Aitkenhead, CEO at Porton Down.

He also reiterated that the information given by Porton Down was one of the many intelligence streams that the Government drew on, and continues to draw on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Once again, the OP has twisted and taken out of context.

Porton Down was never going to say where the Novichok was manufactured, and was only ever going to confirm the type. This was clearly stated by Gary Aitkenhead, CEO at Porton Down.

He also reiterated that the information given by Porton Down was one of the many intelligence streams that the Government drew on, and continues to draw on."

Bullshit i have not taken it out of context

Its simple Porton Down cannot prove where the nerve agent came from

Boris Johnson sat that and told people that Porton Down lab said absolutely categorical the nerve agent was Russian

That was a lie!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Once again, the OP has twisted and taken out of context.

Porton Down was never going to say where the Novichok was manufactured, and was only ever going to confirm the type. This was clearly stated by Gary Aitkenhead, CEO at Porton Down.

He also reiterated that the information given by Porton Down was one of the many intelligence streams that the Government drew on, and continues to draw on.

Bullshit i have not taken it out of context

Its simple Porton Down cannot prove where the nerve agent came from

Boris Johnson sat that and told people that Porton Down lab said absolutely categorical the nerve agent was Russian

That was a lie!!!"

It wasn't a lie, novichok IS Russian.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Remember CLCC you deal in evidence based things so have you any evidence that it was 100% Russia ? If you do get to your local cop shop "

Oh the irony of kinky asking for evidence! !!!!!!!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Chief executive of Porton Down research laboratory has said scientists have not been able to prove the Novichok nerve agent used to poison Sergei and Yulia Skripal came from Russia or establish its country of origin

Anyone think the Tories and Boris Johnson will say sorry for lying

On 29/03/18 he said Porton Down lab was “absolutely categorical” the nerve agent was Russian

From what I can gather the Porton Down "evidence" makes up only a part of the over all picture, that and MI5 / MI6 & GCHQ combined quite possibly makes the picture much more evident.

The other 3 agencies do not make public press conferences disclosing their evidence and methods for obvious reasons so to make a sweeping judgement on just one section of evidence is not painting anything near a full body of guilt or innocence."

Porton Downs examination is only one part of the puzzle! !

The public won't be given all the evidence for years.

The evidence would need to have been convincing to our allies for them to expel the Russian diplomats..... this would not have happened on flimsy evidence as it will be costly to us all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Once again, the OP has twisted and taken out of context.

Porton Down was never going to say where the Novichok was manufactured, and was only ever going to confirm the type. This was clearly stated by Gary Aitkenhead, CEO at Porton Down.

He also reiterated that the information given by Porton Down was one of the many intelligence streams that the Government drew on, and continues to draw on.

Bullshit i have not taken it out of context

Its simple Porton Down cannot prove where the nerve agent came from

Boris Johnson sat that and told people that Porton Down lab said absolutely categorical the nerve agent was Russian

That was a lie!!!

It wasn't a lie, novichok IS Russian. "

Ok CLCC who believes in evidence based stuff do you have proof that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

CLCC you might seriously wana get down to the local cop shop with that info and help the cops out as you seem to be the only one that knows 100% that it was made in Russia

Or you defending your pals the Tories ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Once again, the OP has twisted and taken out of context.

Porton Down was never going to say where the Novichok was manufactured, and was only ever going to confirm the type. This was clearly stated by Gary Aitkenhead, CEO at Porton Down.

He also reiterated that the information given by Porton Down was one of the many intelligence streams that the Government drew on, and continues to draw on.

Bullshit i have not taken it out of context

Its simple Porton Down cannot prove where the nerve agent came from

Boris Johnson sat that and told people that Porton Down lab said absolutely categorical the nerve agent was Russian

That was a lie!!!

It wasn't a lie, novichok IS Russian.

Ok CLCC who believes in evidence based stuff do you have proof that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

CLCC you might seriously wana get down to the local cop shop with that info and help the cops out as you seem to be the only one that knows 100% that it was made in Russia

Or you defending your pals the Tories ?"

I'm saying Novichok is a Russian nerve agent, well Soviet at the time. Who do you believe invented it if not the Russians/Soviets?

Only a fool would disagree with someone based on who they are rather than what they say.

As one of my history teachers uses to ask, "could you trust anything Hitler said?" All the kids would shout "No, he's a liar!" Then the teacher would ask "what if he said "my name is Hitler"?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Once again, the OP has twisted and taken out of context.

Porton Down was never going to say where the Novichok was manufactured, and was only ever going to confirm the type. This was clearly stated by Gary Aitkenhead, CEO at Porton Down.

He also reiterated that the information given by Porton Down was one of the many intelligence streams that the Government drew on, and continues to draw on.

Bullshit i have not taken it out of context

Its simple Porton Down cannot prove where the nerve agent came from

Boris Johnson sat that and told people that Porton Down lab said absolutely categorical the nerve agent was Russian

That was a lie!!!

It wasn't a lie, novichok IS Russian.

Ok CLCC who believes in evidence based stuff do you have proof that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

CLCC you might seriously wana get down to the local cop shop with that info and help the cops out as you seem to be the only one that knows 100% that it was made in Russia

Or you defending your pals the Tories ?

I'm saying Novichok is a Russian nerve agent, well Soviet at the time. Who do you believe invented it if not the Russians/Soviets?

Only a fool would disagree with someone based on who they are rather than what they say.

As one of my history teachers uses to ask, "could you trust anything Hitler said?" All the kids would shout "No, he's a liar!" Then the teacher would ask "what if he said "my name is Hitler"?""

Sooooooo no evidence that the nerve agent was made in Russia?

It could have been anyone let the police etc do their do instead of playing judge and jury

Just think what could have happened because of these nasty bastards in charge in Downing st claiming it was Russia with no evidence could have started a new cold war

This is Iraq all over again no evidence of WMD but took the UK to an illegal war

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Looks like a duck quacks like a duck.Its a fucking duck.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Once again, the OP has twisted and taken out of context.

Porton Down was never going to say where the Novichok was manufactured, and was only ever going to confirm the type. This was clearly stated by Gary Aitkenhead, CEO at Porton Down.

He also reiterated that the information given by Porton Down was one of the many intelligence streams that the Government drew on, and continues to draw on.

Bullshit i have not taken it out of context

Its simple Porton Down cannot prove where the nerve agent came from

Boris Johnson sat that and told people that Porton Down lab said absolutely categorical the nerve agent was Russian

That was a lie!!!

It wasn't a lie, novichok IS Russian.

Ok CLCC who believes in evidence based stuff do you have proof that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

CLCC you might seriously wana get down to the local cop shop with that info and help the cops out as you seem to be the only one that knows 100% that it was made in Russia

Or you defending your pals the Tories ?

I'm saying Novichok is a Russian nerve agent, well Soviet at the time. Who do you believe invented it if not the Russians/Soviets?

Only a fool would disagree with someone based on who they are rather than what they say.

As one of my history teachers uses to ask, "could you trust anything Hitler said?" All the kids would shout "No, he's a liar!" Then the teacher would ask "what if he said "my name is Hitler"?"

Sooooooo no evidence that the nerve agent was made in Russia?

It could have been anyone let the police etc do their do instead of playing judge and jury

Just think what could have happened because of these nasty bastards in charge in Downing st claiming it was Russia with no evidence could have started a new cold war

This is Iraq all over again no evidence of WMD but took the UK to an illegal war "

No, novichok IS Russian, was this particular batch made by Russia is a different matter. There is however a very limited number of states capable of producing it, not just Anyone as you claim. Also you have to look at the victim and who would want to kill them. Would America want to kill them? Would France? Would Russia?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It was the the Maldives government that ordered it using Russian nerve agents !!!

I am prepared to put myself at risk to go to the Maldives to investigate! !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Thats what i am asking CLCC is tgere antmy evidence that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

The Tories said it was Russia where is the evidence the back that claim up ?

It could have been anyone correct ?

If this brings on a new cold war the Tories are too claim

This is how the Iraq war started accusing without any evidence and in the end alot of people dead and no WMD found thanks to Bush and Blair for an iilegal war

Do you wana have more blood on your hands without 100% knowing who it really was ?

We all have to stop this bullshit of playing judge and jury and let this who can work out who it was and bring them in for justice or its gonna end up in a bloodbath with another illegal war

Sorry but Boris and May need to go for this its a seriously matter that they could have cause war happening as i dont trust Putin as much as i so not trust the Tories

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Thats what i am asking CLCC is tgere antmy evidence that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

The Tories said it was Russia where is the evidence the back that claim up ?

It could have been anyone correct ?

If this brings on a new cold war the Tories are too claim

This is how the Iraq war started accusing without any evidence and in the end alot of people dead and no WMD found thanks to Bush and Blair for an iilegal war

Do you wana have more blood on your hands without 100% knowing who it really was ?

We all have to stop this bullshit of playing judge and jury and let this who can work out who it was and bring them in for justice or its gonna end up in a bloodbath with another illegal war

Sorry but Boris and May need to go for this its a seriously matter that they could have cause war happening as i dont trust Putin as much as i so not trust the Tories

"

No, it couldn't have been Anyone, why do you keep repeating this lie? He wasn't stabbed, he wasn't shot, he wasn't thrown off a bridge, he was attacked with a high end nerve agent.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

If this brings on a new cold war the Tories are too claim

"

'too claim'?

To claim?

Too calm?

Two clams?

What are you on about Kinky?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Thats what i am asking CLCC is tgere antmy evidence that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

The Tories said it was Russia where is the evidence the back that claim up ?

It could have been anyone correct ?

If this brings on a new cold war the Tories are too claim

This is how the Iraq war started accusing without any evidence and in the end alot of people dead and no WMD found thanks to Bush and Blair for an iilegal war

Do you wana have more blood on your hands without 100% knowing who it really was ?

We all have to stop this bullshit of playing judge and jury and let this who can work out who it was and bring them in for justice or its gonna end up in a bloodbath with another illegal war

Sorry but Boris and May need to go for this its a seriously matter that they could have cause war happening as i dont trust Putin as much as i so not trust the Tories

No, it couldn't have been Anyone, why do you keep repeating this lie? He wasn't stabbed, he wasn't shot, he wasn't thrown off a bridge, he was attacked with a high end nerve agent."

Ok mr and mrs know it all who made the nerve agent ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Thats what i am asking CLCC is tgere antmy evidence that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

The Tories said it was Russia where is the evidence the back that claim up ?

It could have been anyone correct ?

If this brings on a new cold war the Tories are too claim

This is how the Iraq war started accusing without any evidence and in the end alot of people dead and no WMD found thanks to Bush and Blair for an iilegal war

Do you wana have more blood on your hands without 100% knowing who it really was ?

We all have to stop this bullshit of playing judge and jury and let this who can work out who it was and bring them in for justice or its gonna end up in a bloodbath with another illegal war

Sorry but Boris and May need to go for this its a seriously matter that they could have cause war happening as i dont trust Putin as much as i so not trust the Tories

No, it couldn't have been Anyone, why do you keep repeating this lie? He wasn't stabbed, he wasn't shot, he wasn't thrown off a bridge, he was attacked with a high end nerve agent.

Ok mr and mrs know it all who made the nerve agent ? "

RUSSIA

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icklybitMan
over a year ago

Ayrshire

Anyone.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Anyone. "

Yeah, anyone with a start of the art, state sponsored chemical weapons programme!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Thats what i am asking CLCC is tgere antmy evidence that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

The Tories said it was Russia where is the evidence the back that claim up ?

It could have been anyone correct ?

If this brings on a new cold war the Tories are too claim

This is how the Iraq war started accusing without any evidence and in the end alot of people dead and no WMD found thanks to Bush and Blair for an iilegal war

Do you wana have more blood on your hands without 100% knowing who it really was ?

We all have to stop this bullshit of playing judge and jury and let this who can work out who it was and bring them in for justice or its gonna end up in a bloodbath with another illegal war

Sorry but Boris and May need to go for this its a seriously matter that they could have cause war happening as i dont trust Putin as much as i so not trust the Tories

No, it couldn't have been Anyone, why do you keep repeating this lie? He wasn't stabbed, he wasn't shot, he wasn't thrown off a bridge, he was attacked with a high end nerve agent.

Ok mr and mrs know it all who made the nerve agent ?

RUSSIA"

Lmao do you have the evidence for that get to the cop shop then

As Porton Down lab said they cannot " prove" that the nerve agent came from Russia or establish its country of origin

You seem to know better eh CLCC lmao

Seems you would do anything to protect your pals the Tories

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icklybitMan
over a year ago

Ayrshire

And a means to deliver it.

Easy, you can go to B&Q for that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Thats what i am asking CLCC is tgere antmy evidence that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

The Tories said it was Russia where is the evidence the back that claim up ?

It could have been anyone correct ?

If this brings on a new cold war the Tories are too claim

This is how the Iraq war started accusing without any evidence and in the end alot of people dead and no WMD found thanks to Bush and Blair for an iilegal war

Do you wana have more blood on your hands without 100% knowing who it really was ?

We all have to stop this bullshit of playing judge and jury and let this who can work out who it was and bring them in for justice or its gonna end up in a bloodbath with another illegal war

Sorry but Boris and May need to go for this its a seriously matter that they could have cause war happening as i dont trust Putin as much as i so not trust the Tories

No, it couldn't have been Anyone, why do you keep repeating this lie? He wasn't stabbed, he wasn't shot, he wasn't thrown off a bridge, he was attacked with a high end nerve agent.

Ok mr and mrs know it all who made the nerve agent ?

RUSSIA

Lmao do you have the evidence for that get to the cop shop then

As Porton Down lab said they cannot " prove" that the nerve agent came from Russia or establish its country of origin

You seem to know better eh CLCC lmao

Seems you would do anything to protect your pals the Tories "

They said:

"It is our job to provide the scientific evidence of what this particular nerve agent is - we identified that it is from this particular family and that it is a military grade, but it is not our job to say where it was manufactured."

I'll repeat that last bit for you, I would hate your dyslexia to kick in at a vital moment, "IT IS NOT OUR JOB TO SAY WHERE IT WAS MANUFACTURED."

Got it yet?

If it's not Russia, then who do YOU think it is? And what is their motive. Don't say "anyone", be specific about who has the capability to produce it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found "

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok? "

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Thats what i am asking CLCC is tgere antmy evidence that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

The Tories said it was Russia where is the evidence the back that claim up ?

It could have been anyone correct ?

If this brings on a new cold war the Tories are too claim

This is how the Iraq war started accusing without any evidence and in the end alot of people dead and no WMD found thanks to Bush and Blair for an iilegal war

Do you wana have more blood on your hands without 100% knowing who it really was ?

We all have to stop this bullshit of playing judge and jury and let this who can work out who it was and bring them in for justice or its gonna end up in a bloodbath with another illegal war

Sorry but Boris and May need to go for this its a seriously matter that they could have cause war happening as i dont trust Putin as much as i so not trust the Tories

No, it couldn't have been Anyone, why do you keep repeating this lie? He wasn't stabbed, he wasn't shot, he wasn't thrown off a bridge, he was attacked with a high end nerve agent.

Ok mr and mrs know it all who made the nerve agent ?

RUSSIA

Lmao do you have the evidence for that get to the cop shop then

As Porton Down lab said they cannot " prove" that the nerve agent came from Russia or establish its country of origin

You seem to know better eh CLCC lmao

Seems you would do anything to protect your pals the Tories

They said:

"It is our job to provide the scientific evidence of what this particular nerve agent is - we identified that it is from this particular family and that it is a military grade, but it is not our job to say where it was manufactured."

I'll repeat that last bit for you, I would hate your dyslexia to kick in at a vital moment, "IT IS NOT OUR JOB TO SAY WHERE IT WAS MANUFACTURED."

Got it yet?

If it's not Russia, then who do YOU think it is? And what is their motive. Don't say "anyone", be specific about who has the capability to produce it. "

It was reported on Sky News that there are 20 countries that have the capability to produce this nerve agent

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Thats what i am asking CLCC is tgere antmy evidence that the nerve agent was made in Russia ?

The Tories said it was Russia where is the evidence the back that claim up ?

It could have been anyone correct ?

If this brings on a new cold war the Tories are too claim

This is how the Iraq war started accusing without any evidence and in the end alot of people dead and no WMD found thanks to Bush and Blair for an iilegal war

Do you wana have more blood on your hands without 100% knowing who it really was ?

We all have to stop this bullshit of playing judge and jury and let this who can work out who it was and bring them in for justice or its gonna end up in a bloodbath with another illegal war

Sorry but Boris and May need to go for this its a seriously matter that they could have cause war happening as i dont trust Putin as much as i so not trust the Tories

No, it couldn't have been Anyone, why do you keep repeating this lie? He wasn't stabbed, he wasn't shot, he wasn't thrown off a bridge, he was attacked with a high end nerve agent.

Ok mr and mrs know it all who made the nerve agent ?

RUSSIA

Lmao do you have the evidence for that get to the cop shop then

As Porton Down lab said they cannot " prove" that the nerve agent came from Russia or establish its country of origin

You seem to know better eh CLCC lmao

Seems you would do anything to protect your pals the Tories

They said:

"It is our job to provide the scientific evidence of what this particular nerve agent is - we identified that it is from this particular family and that it is a military grade, but it is not our job to say where it was manufactured."

I'll repeat that last bit for you, I would hate your dyslexia to kick in at a vital moment, "IT IS NOT OUR JOB TO SAY WHERE IT WAS MANUFACTURED."

Got it yet?

If it's not Russia, then who do YOU think it is? And what is their motive. Don't say "anyone", be specific about who has the capability to produce it.

It was reported on Sky News that there are 20 countries that have the capability to produce this nerve agent"

So we have gone from more that 7.6 billion suspect that kinky believes are capable, to 20! That is a significant drop!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really "

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Offttt now the Foreign office twitter page

They said this on the 22nd March and guess what it has now been deleted i wonder why that is eh ? But as usually people wont care they will be more than hapoy to defend Boris Johnson abd May anything to keep the soin away from brexit

" Analysis by world leading expects at the defence science technology lab at Porton down made clear that this was a military grade Novichok nerve agent produced in Russia. Porton down is OPCW accredited and designed lab"

I wonder why this has now been deleted eh ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If it's not Russia, then who do YOU think it is? And what is their motive. Don't say "anyone", be specific about who has the capability to produce it.

It was reported on Sky News that there are 20 countries that have the capability to produce this nerve agent

So we have gone from more that 7.6 billion suspect that kinky believes are capable, to 20! That is a significant drop! "

7.6 billion what; CLCC

explain your figure, be specific? and what has it got in relation to the comment I made from Sky News where they said there are 20 countries that have the capability to produce this nerve agent

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"If it's not Russia, then who do YOU think it is? And what is their motive. Don't say "anyone", be specific about who has the capability to produce it.

It was reported on Sky News that there are 20 countries that have the capability to produce this nerve agent

So we have gone from more that 7.6 billion suspect that kinky believes are capable, to 20! That is a significant drop!

7.6 billion what; CLCC

explain your figure, be specific? and what has it got in relation to the comment I made from Sky News where they said there are 20 countries that have the capability to produce this nerve agent"

Kinky keeps on saying that anyone could have done it, anyone in the world, 7.6 billion people in the world are suspects according to Kinky. That's completely nuts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it."

No i am not lying thats what it says

Dont go in huff CLCC and in a wee rage mode

You are always looking for a argument cant accept people wont alway agree with you

so people have to be forced into believing every word you said?

People are now more and more seeing you are trying to force people into you way of thinking like no one is to every have a different opinion

Remember where you are ... fab a swinging site for fun ? Hehehe

God someone must have stole your Easter eggs lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it."

Who is kinky lying ?if no one knows exactly who done it it means it could have been anyone ,also no one knows how many enimies this guy had or who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs ,you should stop listening to goverment propaganda as its making you sound foolish

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Theresa May and Boris Johnson have made this issue an embarrassment now. It is annoying having Putin asking for proof and the UK unable to provide any.

Could it have been Russia maybe is also could have been anyone the UK government have blew it big time and we may never know

My opinion the Tories thought they could use this as spin to take the heat off their brexit mess now its backfired on them and made them look silly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East


"Anyone.

Yeah, anyone with a start of the art, state sponsored chemical weapons programme! "

It can’t be state of the art, surely - the assasination was a failure.

Unless that was the intended outcome.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Theresa May and Boris Johnson have made this issue an embarrassment now. It is annoying having Putin asking for proof and the UK unable to provide any.

Could it have been Russia maybe is also could have been anyone the UK government have blew it big time and we may never know

My opinion the Tories thought they could use this as spin to take the heat off their brexit mess now its backfired on them and made them look silly "

its made them look like the amateurs that they are its backfired big time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it.

Who is kinky lying ?if no one knows exactly who done it it means it could have been anyone ,also no one knows how many enimies this guy had or who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs ,you should stop listening to goverment propaganda as its making you sound foolish "

You look foolish if you are saying that Novichok could be produced by anyone. It's as daft as saying that anyone could make a nuclear weapon.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icklybitMan
over a year ago

Ayrshire

It is possible to make comparitive crude Novichok in labs, however it is the purity and the telling phrase "military grade" that is being ignored here.

Who has military grade Novichok?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *thwalescplCouple
over a year ago

brecon


"If it's not Russia, then who do YOU think it is? And what is their motive. Don't say "anyone", be specific about who has the capability to produce it.

It was reported on Sky News that there are 20 countries that have the capability to produce this nerve agent

So we have gone from more that 7.6 billion suspect that kinky believes are capable, to 20! That is a significant drop!

7.6 billion what; CLCC

explain your figure, be specific? and what has it got in relation to the comment I made from Sky News where they said there are 20 countries that have the capability to produce this nerve agent"

Any country that has a brewing industry "could" produce biological weapons on a large scale.

Any country that has a Petro-chemical industry ( especially producing fertilisers etc) "could" produce basic chemical weapons ( including some basic nerve agents) on an industrial scale.

However, very few do, and most only produce small amounts in order to design and test protective equipment and countermeasures against possible attacks.

Any country that develops them immediately makes themselves a target, plus the restrictions and penalties that are imposed by the rest of the global community means it's just not worth the hassle.

Without going into details, one terrorist single-handed got within a few days of producing a crude form of nerve agent in the kitchen of a flat, however the risks he took and the chances of him poisoning himself were very high.

The high end stuff that poisoned the Skripals requires years of quality lab time and research, and was developed only by Russia.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it.

Who is kinky lying ?if no one knows exactly who done it it means it could have been anyone ,also no one knows how many enimies this guy had or who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs ,you should stop listening to goverment propaganda as its making you sound foolish

You look foolish if you are saying that Novichok could be produced by anyone. It's as daft as saying that anyone could make a nuclear weapon."

Remember when you deal in evidence strange as the Tories have no evidence it was Russia and the Foreign Office is deleting tweets that accuse Russia of the nerve agent attack

Sure you wanna defend the Tories CLCC ? Look at their track record in lies

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it.

Who is kinky lying ?if no one knows exactly who done it it means it could have been anyone ,also no one knows how many enimies this guy had or who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs ,you should stop listening to goverment propaganda as its making you sound foolish

You look foolish if you are saying that Novichok could be produced by anyone. It's as daft as saying that anyone could make a nuclear weapon.

Remember when you deal in evidence strange as the Tories have no evidence it was Russia and the Foreign Office is deleting tweets that accuse Russia of the nerve agent attack

Sure you wanna defend the Tories CLCC ? Look at their track record in lies"

You obviously don't deal in facts, you think anyone in the world could have created this military grade novichok as mentioned above.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it.

Who is kinky lying ?if no one knows exactly who done it it means it could have been anyone ,also no one knows how many enimies this guy had or who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs ,you should stop listening to goverment propaganda as its making you sound foolish

You look foolish if you are saying that Novichok could be produced by anyone. It's as daft as saying that anyone could make a nuclear weapon.

Remember when you deal in evidence strange as the Tories have no evidence it was Russia and the Foreign Office is deleting tweets that accuse Russia of the nerve agent attack

Sure you wanna defend the Tories CLCC ? Look at their track record in lies

You obviously don't deal in facts, you think anyone in the world could have created this military grade novichok as mentioned above. "

Again there is no evidence Russia made it

It could have been anyone

Why do you think the Foreign Office is deleting a tweet accusing Russia of the attack ?

The UK government are a fucking joke " if" it was Russia then they have let Putin off the hook to then ask the UK government to provide proof it now makes them look silly when all it took was to get 100% evidence to nail Putin with but nope couldnt do that

This in my opinion is all spin to take the heat of the Tories and their own brexit mess

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lymDrewMan
over a year ago

plymouth


"So who do you think recreated this Russian nerve agent to kill a Russian spy on British soil like Litvinyenko and Mark of?

Could have been anyone

The fact is the Tories have lied

Could it have been anyone? Who has the ability to create top end nerve agents? Start thinking about that, and will start to narrow down your list of subjects. "

It was designed by the Russian chemists to be easily made in the field, so it can be made in a agricultural chemical plant and all the precursors are not on banned lists. Iran has been suspected of replicating it in 2016. Hence why Portadown labs can't 100% say where it was produced.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icklybitMan
over a year ago

Ayrshire

"It could have been anyone"

Who is capable of making military grade Novichok?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


""It could have been anyone"

Who is capable of making military grade Novichok?

"

Is there books out there that someone that has chemistery knowedge to how to make this ?

Thibk outside the box instead of bein telt by the UK government and British corrupt media

It maybe very well be Russia but the fact remains those accusing have fuck all evidence its like your all dying to start a new cold war another illegal war fucking learn from Iraq

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham

The CEO at Porton Down said that the sophistication meant that it had to be a "State actor" that produced it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


""It could have been anyone"

Who is capable of making military grade Novichok?

Is there books out there that someone that has chemistery knowedge to how to make this ?

Thibk outside the box instead of bein telt by the UK government and British corrupt media

It maybe very well be Russia but the fact remains those accusing have fuck all evidence its like your all dying to start a new cold war another illegal war fucking learn from Iraq "

Do you believe that anyone with a physics book could build a nuclear weapon?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Those that love acussing Russia where the fuck is the evidence ?

Could it have been Russia ? Maybe it very well was

But the fact is " if" it was Russia you lot are letting Putin off the hook and he now is throwing it back to the Tories to prove it which they clearly cant making them look ailky to the rest of the world

Stop believing every word that Boris is telkibg you or the media think outside the box

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It is possible to make comparitive crude Novichok in labs, however it is the purity and the telling phrase "military grade" that is being ignored here.

Who has military grade Novichok?

"

I have some in my kitchen if you send me a brown envelope I will mail you some

Do you need anything else as I have 4 exocet missiles taking up room in my back bedroom !!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East


""It could have been anyone"

Who is capable of making military grade Novichok?

Is there books out there that someone that has chemistery knowedge to how to make this ?

Thibk outside the box instead of bein telt by the UK government and British corrupt media

It maybe very well be Russia but the fact remains those accusing have fuck all evidence its like your all dying to start a new cold war another illegal war fucking learn from Iraq

Do you believe that anyone with a physics book could build a nuclear weapon? "

No. But anyone with a physics book can make a radiological dispersion device, or “dirty bomb”

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"It is possible to make comparitive crude Novichok in labs, however it is the purity and the telling phrase "military grade" that is being ignored here.

Who has military grade Novichok?

I have some in my kitchen if you send me a brown envelope I will mail you some

Do you need anything else as I have 4 exocet missiles taking up room in my back bedroom !!!!"

Making jokes about this now ? Thats sad

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icklybitMan
over a year ago

Ayrshire

That by definition is NOT a nuclear weapon, as neither fusion or fission takes place.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

The Foreign Office tweeted on March 22 that Porton Down was clear about it being made in Russia.

Today the tweet was deleted.

The kindest thing you can say is the politicians manipulated the evidence to reach a desired outcome.

Why?

Does it get them brownie points with ex-Warsaw Pact EU states if they are seen to be hard on Russia?

Or is it just plain incompetence and buffoonery by a set of politicians whose ambition greatly exceeds their meagre ability.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icklybitMan
over a year ago

Ayrshire

BoJos over exuberance does not exonerate Russia.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

The fact is the Tories have lied "

About the only true thing you said on here. Tell me something I don't know. All politicians lie, including your traitor sturgeon.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

The fact is the Tories have lied

About the only true thing you said on here. Tell me something I don't know. All politicians lie, including your traitor sturgeon."

why is she a traitor and to who?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Its strange the amount of people on here last week claiming to follow the rule of law so fast do a u-turn

I thought its important follow the law and insist on evidence before accusing anyone of anything.

You know " Actus Reus"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

The UK government and PM are the problem, coupled with incompetent dangerous individuals like Boris. Theresa May won't get rid of him easily, as he's a significant danger to her and helps deflect attention from her incompetence. The whole brexit fiasco has been something that she's cultivated, with useless good for nothings running the show, under her. As long as the conservative party survives, preferably in government, is their only care.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"It surely this is a resignation issue for BorisJohnson as the UK's chief diplomat on a matter so serious and Theresa May for backing him up and blaming the Russians without any evidence

"

My god I do agree on this point

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The UK government and PM are the problem, coupled with incompetent dangerous individuals like Boris. Theresa May won't get rid of him easily, as he's a significant danger to her and helps deflect attention from her incompetence. The whole brexit fiasco has been something that she's cultivated, with useless good for nothings running the show, under her. As long as the conservative party survives, preferably in government, is their only care. "

but who can replace them in government right now? Labour with a fool in charge, who would vote labour at this present time?

bloody glad I am in Scotland, don't have that alarming choice

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It is possible to make comparitive crude Novichok in labs, however it is the purity and the telling phrase "military grade" that is being ignored here.

Who has military grade Novichok?

I have some in my kitchen if you send me a brown envelope I will mail you some

Do you need anything else as I have 4 exocet missiles taking up room in my back bedroom !!!!

Making jokes about this now ? Thats sad "

Yes

Simply because all this thread is look what the big bad Tories have done !!!!

The information from porton down is only one part of the jigsaw. So the whole issue cannot be condensed into a small statement from porton down when we don't know all the facts.

As I stated before our allies would have demanded concrete proof from the government before taking action against Russia.

The Russians are only wanting a joint investigation to try and find out what our security services know and how they came to their conclusions.

So just carry on with your big bad Tory thread !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Its strange the amount of people on here last week claiming to follow the rule of law so fast do a u-turn

I thought its important follow the law and insist on evidence before accusing anyone of anything.

You know " Actus Reus" "

Which law says the public need evidence before accusing someone of something?

You do come up with the Grade A Shite!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Suspection is not enough to get someone on

You need Actus Reus

So all those loving accusing Russia where is the hardcore evidence that 100% its Russia ? You lot are handing it too Putin to take the piss and turn it on the UK government to prove it which they cant

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

If it was a murder trial in this country the so called murderer would be let off and the crown prosecution service criticised for coming to court without enough evidence.

I have to admit that I am ashamed of this country over this matter,it could have dire consequences for international relations over the next few years and we have been made to look stupid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Suspection is not enough to get someone on

You need Actus Reus

So all those loving accusing Russia where is the hardcore evidence that 100% its Russia ? You lot are handing it too Putin to take the piss and turn it on the UK government to prove it which they cant "

Suspection?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Suspection is not enough to get someone on

You need Actus Reus

So all those loving accusing Russia where is the hardcore evidence that 100% its Russia ? You lot are handing it too Putin to take the piss and turn it on the UK government to prove it which they cant

Suspection?

"

Well done must make you feel great making fun of someone with deslexia

I think and hope everyone would see i meant "suspicion" but yeah thanks for trying to make fun of me and belittle me for trying

I know what it makes you though bully!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it.

Who is kinky lying ?if no one knows exactly who done it it means it could have been anyone ,also no one knows how many enimies this guy had or who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs ,you should stop listening to goverment propaganda as its making you sound foolish

You look foolish if you are saying that Novichok could be produced by anyone. It's as daft as saying that anyone could make a nuclear weapon."

Lol where in my post have i mentioned produced ? No one knows this guys background and who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs thats why the goverment and fools like you who beleive them were too quick to blame russia

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it.

Who is kinky lying ?if no one knows exactly who done it it means it could have been anyone ,also no one knows how many enimies this guy had or who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs ,you should stop listening to goverment propaganda as its making you sound foolish

You look foolish if you are saying that Novichok could be produced by anyone. It's as daft as saying that anyone could make a nuclear weapon.

Lol where in my post have i mentioned produced ? No one knows this guys background and who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs thats why the goverment and fools like you who beleive them were too quick to blame russia "

Do you think someone brought it off eBay?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Still no evidence CLCC but wilking to blame Russia anyway

What happened to rule of Law ? That was a quick u-turn from you " both"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it.

Who is kinky lying ?if no one knows exactly who done it it means it could have been anyone ,also no one knows how many enimies this guy had or who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs ,you should stop listening to goverment propaganda as its making you sound foolish

You look foolish if you are saying that Novichok could be produced by anyone. It's as daft as saying that anyone could make a nuclear weapon.

Lol where in my post have i mentioned produced ? No one knows this guys background and who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs thats why the goverment and fools like you who beleive them were too quick to blame russia

Do you think someone brought it off eBay? "

Amazon Prime...with free shipping?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"Anyone could have i wont plsy a wee silly game of playing judge and jury

You CLCC are accusing Russia without evidence dangerous to do that

You as a Labour man should know better about accusing countries eh Not learned from Iraq unless you wanted bloodshed in Iraq where no WMD was found

Why do you keep on lying? Could you have produced Novichok?

I aint lying

You sound more right wing every single day

Is that how you deal with things go about accusing others without any evidence sad really

You are lying that anyone could have done it. That is a straight up lie. There is nothing right wing or left wing about it.

Who is kinky lying ?if no one knows exactly who done it it means it could have been anyone ,also no one knows how many enimies this guy had or who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs ,you should stop listening to goverment propaganda as its making you sound foolish

You look foolish if you are saying that Novichok could be produced by anyone. It's as daft as saying that anyone could make a nuclear weapon.

Lol where in my post have i mentioned produced ? No one knows this guys background and who he has been dealing with over the last few yrs thats why the goverment and fools like you who beleive them were too quick to blame russia

Do you think someone brought it off eBay?

Amazon Prime...with free shipping?"

Obviously, why manufacture your own chemical weapons when you can buy them online.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Russia might be innocent of this crime, but how do any of us know (100%) that there is no evidence. The general consensus is that the government do not tell the public everything, so why assume all the evidence, or the lack thereof, can be measured by what’s out in the public.

I’m no BoJo fan - that must be said.

Doing nothing until the government is close to certainty was not a plausible option: indesicion can be worse than making the wrong decision.

Those of us demanding our government be 100% certain and referencing the law are misinterpreting the judicial system. Certainty is not always needed and in fact it’s an abstract term. You could assault someone and claim it was aliens; dna tests are not 100% and expert witnesses are far from 100% reliable.

It is not possible for just anyone to create military grade chemical weapons. Knowledge, or a book is not enough. Just try ordering the hardware needed and see if the police wait until they are 100% certain before they act.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

The BBC have been pish and covering this whole thing

In the back pocket of the Tories

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No one on here has any clue as to what evidence MI5 / MI6 & GCHQ have added to the mix that paints the whole picture of evidence.

I do bloody hope it's damn good evidence that points to Russia because how do we ever come back from where we are now with any credibility.

I would hazard a guess for the other heads of states to back us the evidence we have not been given disclosure of is rather compelling.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You know the answer to the question 'how can you tell if a politician is lying?', the answer being that you can see their lips moving. Well...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"The BBC have been pish and covering this whole thing

In the back pocket of the Tories "

You said you don't have a television licence and you don't watch or listen to the BBC, so how would you know?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"The BBC have been pish and covering this whole thing

In the back pocket of the Tories

You said you don't have a television licence and you don't watch or listen to the BBC, so how would you know?"

Thank you i knew this was coming thats why i put it to see who would catch on lol

So i cannot go to a friends that has a licence and he or she was watching it ? Do you go friend think you have the right to dictate to them what they watch ?

Glad to help you with that maybe just maybe people gotta start thinking lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"Still no evidence CLCC but wilking to blame Russia anyway

What happened to rule of Law ? That was a quick u-turn from you " both" "

Seeing as you keep bringing up the rule of law, do you accept the ruling of the UK Supreme court yet that said the Scottish Parliament and the other devolved Parliaments don't get a say on Brexit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Still no evidence CLCC but wilking to blame Russia anyway

What happened to rule of Law ? That was a quick u-turn from you " both"

Seeing as you keep bringing up the rule of law, do you accept the ruling of the UK Supreme court yet that said the Scottish Parliament and the other devolved Parliaments don't get a say on Brexit. "

Keep going your only proving the UK is not equal

Will be good to watch brexit voters cause the UK to break apart lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"The BBC have been pish and covering this whole thing

In the back pocket of the Tories

You said you don't have a television licence and you don't watch or listen to the BBC, so how would you know?

Thank you i knew this was coming thats why i put it to see who would catch on lol

So i cannot go to a friends that has a licence and he or she was watching it ? Do you go friend think you have the right to dictate to them what they watch ?

Glad to help you with that maybe just maybe people gotta start thinking lol "

So when I asked you if the BBC had been biased against Brexit during the EU referendum you said you couldn't answer because you don't watch it, don't listen to it or have a television licence? Are you honestly saying that you never watched any coverage on your 'friends' telly during months and months of EU referendum campaigning?

Yet now all of a sudden you can form an opinion on the BBC coverage of the Salisbury poisoning after just a couple of weeks???? Lolololol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"Still no evidence CLCC but wilking to blame Russia anyway

What happened to rule of Law ? That was a quick u-turn from you " both"

Seeing as you keep bringing up the rule of law, do you accept the ruling of the UK Supreme court yet that said the Scottish Parliament and the other devolved Parliaments don't get a say on Brexit.

Keep going your only proving the UK is not equal

Will be good to watch brexit voters cause the UK to break apart lol

"

Do you accept the rule of law and the ruling of the Supreme court? Yes or No?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

[Removed by poster at 04/04/18 23:24:42]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"The BBC have been pish and covering this whole thing

In the back pocket of the Tories

You said you don't have a television licence and you don't watch or listen to the BBC, so how would you know?

Thank you i knew this was coming thats why i put it to see who would catch on lol

So i cannot go to a friends that has a licence and he or she was watching it ? Do you go friend think you have the right to dictate to them what they watch ?

Glad to help you with that maybe just maybe people gotta start thinking lol

So when I asked you if the BBC had been biased against Brexit during the EU referendum you said you couldn't answer because you don't watch it, don't listen to it or have a television licence? Are you honestly saying that you never watched any coverage on your 'friends' telly during months and months of EU referendum campaigning?

Yet now all of a sudden you can form an opinion on the BBC coverage of the Salisbury poisoning after just a couple of weeks???? Lolololol "

Yes i am honestly saying no i didnt watch it at a friends in 2016 why cause i wasnt friends with this friend only met him or her in early 2017 you know like you do meet people and become friends lmao

wtf ? I was only had at his or hers for a wee while yesterday and yes bugger all from them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icklybitMan
over a year ago

Ayrshire

Convincing?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Convincing?

"

Wanting more attention Ticklybit ? Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"Still no evidence CLCC but wilking to blame Russia anyway

What happened to rule of Law ? That was a quick u-turn from you " both"

Seeing as you keep bringing up the rule of law, do you accept the ruling of the UK Supreme court yet that said the Scottish Parliament and the other devolved Parliaments don't get a say on Brexit.

Keep going your only proving the UK is not equal

Will be good to watch brexit voters cause the UK to break apart lol

Do you accept the rule of law and the ruling of the Supreme court? Yes or No? "

No answer to this then kinky?

What a Surprise

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond

Skripal pets starved to death and corpses burnt, bench where the victims were found removed, plans about pulling down their home and even restaurants visited. UK is destroying important and valuable evidence

Offttt the UK something to hide ?

No evidence but will accuse a country of harming human beings

Is this the same UK that loves starting illegal wars and killing innocent people

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Skripal pets starved to death and corpses burnt, bench where the victims were found removed, plans about pulling down their home and even restaurants visited. UK is destroying important and valuable evidence

Offttt the UK something to hide ?

No evidence but will accuse a country of harming human beings

Is this the same UK that loves starting illegal wars and killing innocent people "

STARTING ILLEGAL WARS ????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston


"Skripal pets starved to death and corpses burnt, bench where the victims were found removed, plans about pulling down their home and even restaurants visited. UK is destroying important and valuable evidence

Offttt the UK something to hide ?

No evidence but will accuse a country of harming human beings

Is this the same UK that loves starting illegal wars and killing innocent people "

No, there is no vital evidence to be destroyed, there are items and places that are irrevocably contaminated and are a danger to any that come in contact with those places and things, and can further contaminate other places and things being made safe.

When we first started talking about this I said chemical weapons come in 4 types, nerve, blood, choking and blister agents. They have 2 separate rolls, one (nerve agents for the most part) is to kill and quickly disperse and breakdown becoming nontoxic allowing troops to capture the cleared ground. The Russians even have regiments of specially trained chemical infantry, armour and logistics to operate in these environments. The second sort of chemical agents are designed to be persistent and not to kill all immediately, their roll is to deny access and to force an enemy to divert medical (and other) resources to deal with the aftermath, thus 'fixing' assets that are needed elsewhere.

It is clear (at least to me) that this is what is being dealt with in Salisbury.

It is also clear to me, that you Kinky, either have no knowledge of the subject you are so busy passing judgement on, or are deliberately misrepresenting the reality of the situation to benefit your own (and in this case totally perverse) nationalist agenda.

To be honest I hope it is the prior but from some of our previous exchanges I fear it is the latter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Skripal pets starved to death and corpses burnt, bench where the victims were found removed, plans about pulling down their home and even restaurants visited. UK is destroying important and valuable evidence

Offttt the UK something to hide ?

No evidence but will accuse a country of harming human beings

Is this the same UK that loves starting illegal wars and killing innocent people

No, there is no vital evidence to be destroyed, there are items and places that are irrevocably contaminated and are a danger to any that come in contact with those places and things, and can further contaminate other places and things being made safe.

When we first started talking about this I said chemical weapons come in 4 types, nerve, blood, choking and blister agents. They have 2 separate rolls, one (nerve agents for the most part) is to kill and quickly disperse and breakdown becoming nontoxic allowing troops to capture the cleared ground. The Russians even have regiments of specially trained chemical infantry, armour and logistics to operate in these environments. The second sort of chemical agents are designed to be persistent and not to kill all immediately, their roll is to deny access and to force an enemy to divert medical (and other) resources to deal with the aftermath, thus 'fixing' assets that are needed elsewhere.

It is clear (at least to me) that this is what is being dealt with in Salisbury.

It is also clear to me, that you Kinky, either have no knowledge of the subject you are so busy passing judgement on, or are deliberately misrepresenting the reality of the situation to benefit your own (and in this case totally perverse) nationalist agenda.

To be honest I hope it is the prior but from some of our previous exchanges I fear it is the latter."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Skripal pets starved to death and corpses burnt, bench where the victims were found removed, plans about pulling down their home and even restaurants visited. UK is destroying important and valuable evidence

Offttt the UK something to hide ?

No evidence but will accuse a country of harming human beings

Is this the same UK that loves starting illegal wars and killing innocent people

STARTING ILLEGAL WARS ????"

Ask your Labour party about that eh ? Where was the WMD ?

Blood on all your hands remember that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Skripal pets starved to death and corpses burnt, bench where the victims were found removed, plans about pulling down their home and even restaurants visited. UK is destroying important and valuable evidence

Offttt the UK something to hide ?

No evidence but will accuse a country of harming human beings

Is this the same UK that loves starting illegal wars and killing innocent people

STARTING ILLEGAL WARS ????

Ask your Labour party about that eh ? Where was the WMD ?

Blood on all your hands remember that "

But did they start a war without the un sanctioning ????

They were bit part players at best !!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkyHnS OP   Couple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"Skripal pets starved to death and corpses burnt, bench where the victims were found removed, plans about pulling down their home and even restaurants visited. UK is destroying important and valuable evidence

Offttt the UK something to hide ?

No evidence but will accuse a country of harming human beings

Is this the same UK that loves starting illegal wars and killing innocent people

STARTING ILLEGAL WARS ????

Ask your Labour party about that eh ? Where was the WMD ?

Blood on all your hands remember that

But did they start a war without the un sanctioning ????

They were bit part players at best !!!!

"

Am sorry you asking me a question without answering mine thats ok i will wait

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston


"Ask your Labour party about that eh ? Where was the WMD ?

Blood on all your hands remember that "

I am no fan of Blair, I believe he is nothing but a deep cover Tory used to help move all politics so far to the right that anything that is not virtually fascist policy is now believed to be communist.

But Blair was honest with the British people over the Iraq war when he said that: 'For the UK to retain its special relationship with the USA it had to pay the "blood price".' The was was legal, it was sanctioned by the UN. The WMD story was a 'convenience' that was used to pour oil on the troubled waters and abrogate our collective guilt.

The fact is post WW2 there has only been one British PM who has been able to resist the USA's demands for the UK to pay their 'blood price' when they have gone to war. That PM was one Harold Wilson (Labour) who managed to refuse to sent regular British Armed Forces to the Vietnam war (but there were other costs for that).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Skripal pets starved to death and corpses burnt, bench where the victims were found removed, plans about pulling down their home and even restaurants visited. UK is destroying important and valuable evidence

Offttt the UK something to hide ?

No evidence but will accuse a country of harming human beings

Is this the same UK that loves starting illegal wars and killing innocent people

STARTING ILLEGAL WARS ????

Ask your Labour party about that eh ? Where was the WMD ?

Blood on all your hands remember that

But did they start a war without the un sanctioning ????

They were bit part players at best !!!!

Am sorry you asking me a question without answering mine thats ok i will wait "

I was not asking you any question and I was not aware you had asked one of me !!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"The BBC have been pish and covering this whole thing

In the back pocket of the Tories "

How much BBC coverage have you viewed, to support you in making a comprehensive and reliable judgement? What percentage of their coverage have you personally seen? As you are making such a definitive statement, it would help us to qualify the calibre of that statement.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If it's not Russia, then who do YOU think it is?

The high end stuff that poisoned the Skripals requires years of quality lab time and research, and was developed only by Russia.

"

Was it though? It wasn't Russia it was originally manufactured in, it was the USSR. It's an old product, I'd put money on every UN country, and more, having the capability to produce it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston


"I'd put money on every UN country, and more, having the capability to produce it.

"

You would loose that bet...

To safely manufacture any post WW2 weapons grade chemical agent you need an absolute minimum of a CL3 laboratory and to manufacture something like the agent used in Salisbury a CL4 lab is required.

In the UK there are only 4 or 5 CL4 labs all of which are government owned and controlled and very few private CL3 labs, most of which are in universities that carry out primary virology research. Other than that I only know of the location of 1 private CL3 lab which was the toxicology lab at the old ICI (then Astra Zenica) research facility Alderley Park.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top