FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Law

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

If you could change a law of act of parliament what would it be and why ?

Also if you could introduce one and why ?

Please Not BRExIT !!!

Enough on every thread lol !

Have fun

Mr Suit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

I would introduce the death penalty for drivers who don't give a thank you wave.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I would introduce the death penalty for drivers who don't give a thank you wave."
and your reason lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I would introduce the death penalty for drivers who don't give a thank you wave."

you wouldn't notice, you have already admitted on the forum you drive too fast and recklessly

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"I would introduce the death penalty for drivers who don't give a thank you wave.

you wouldn't notice, you have already admitted on the forum you drive too fast and recklessly "

Nah, I was honest that there are situations when people might not be able to stop, you lied that you would always be able to stop, no matter the situation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oredShitlessxxxCouple
over a year ago

luton

A strict liability penalty of say having to wear a tag for 6 months, for being caught carrying a knife. Applicable to kids/teenagers, rather than a referral to the YOT, whom dont really do much.

Reason, so that police can use the info provided by the tag, ie location and timings of such to build up a case, if the said person is recorded as being in the same location and time of a fatal stabbing.

Just a thought !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"A strict liability penalty of say having to wear a tag for 6 months, for being caught carrying a knife. Applicable to kids/teenagers, rather than a referral to the YOT, whom dont really do much.

Reason, so that police can use the info provided by the tag, ie location and timings of such to build up a case, if the said person is recorded as being in the same location and time of a fatal stabbing.

Just a thought !"
I like that idea but make it longer !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agermeisterMan
over a year ago

Leeds

Fly tipping as a capital offence

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edangel_2013Woman
over a year ago

southend


"A strict liability penalty of say having to wear a tag for 6 months, for being caught carrying a knife. Applicable to kids/teenagers, rather than a referral to the YOT, whom dont really do much.

Reason, so that police can use the info provided by the tag, ie location and timings of such to build up a case, if the said person is recorded as being in the same location and time of a fatal stabbing.

Just a thought !"

That would require 2 law changes. Currently the tag that records where someone is, is voluntary, not court ordered.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oredShitlessxxxCouple
over a year ago

luton


"A strict liability penalty of say having to wear a tag for 6 months, for being caught carrying a knife. Applicable to kids/teenagers, rather than a referral to the YOT, whom dont really do much.

Reason, so that police can use the info provided by the tag, ie location and timings of such to build up a case, if the said person is recorded as being in the same location and time of a fatal stabbing.

Just a thought !

That would require 2 law changes. Currently the tag that records where someone is, is voluntary, not court ordered."

Parliament has overall Sovereignity in its power to implement Law over the Land. Im sure they could do it... lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East

I'd abolish the law that requires planning permission for an erection over 8ft

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Legalise all drugs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edangel_2013Woman
over a year ago

southend


"A strict liability penalty of say having to wear a tag for 6 months, for being caught carrying a knife. Applicable to kids/teenagers, rather than a referral to the YOT, whom dont really do much.

Reason, so that police can use the info provided by the tag, ie location and timings of such to build up a case, if the said person is recorded as being in the same location and time of a fatal stabbing.

Just a thought !

That would require 2 law changes. Currently the tag that records where someone is, is voluntary, not court ordered.

Parliament has overall Sovereignity in its power to implement Law over the Land. Im sure they could do it... lol"

Apparently it's a breach of human rights knowing exactly where someone is at all times. Hence why most phones and computers have cookies and tracking softwear.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"I'd abolish the law that requires planning permission for an erection over 8ft

"

Jesus, I can't get mine over 6 inches!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol East


"A strict liability penalty of say having to wear a tag for 6 months, for being caught carrying a knife. Applicable to kids/teenagers, rather than a referral to the YOT, whom dont really do much.

Reason, so that police can use the info provided by the tag, ie location and timings of such to build up a case, if the said person is recorded as being in the same location and time of a fatal stabbing.

Just a thought !

That would require 2 law changes. Currently the tag that records where someone is, is voluntary, not court ordered.

Parliament has overall Sovereignity in its power to implement Law over the Land. Im sure they could do it... lol

Apparently it's a breach of human rights knowing exactly where someone is at all times. Hence why most phones and computers have cookies and tracking softwear."

We have a right to privacy.

The law tries to balance that with other interests.

But fundamentally we are free to do as please without interference in our lives.

Someone summed it up as thus:

We can do whatever we want, except that which is prohibited by Parliament.

A public body, or a public official, can do nothing, except that which Parliament empowers them to do.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would change the law that says, if you own rental properties, they don't have to be habitable to be inhabited... I mean wtf is that about?!?!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If you could change a law of act of parliament what would it be and why ?

Also if you could introduce one and why ?

"

I guess it would have to be to change our firearms laws to match the USA

no brainer really.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If you could change a law of act of parliament what would it be and why ?

Also if you could introduce one and why ?

I guess it would have to be to change our firearms laws to match the USA

no brainer really."

Thats the dumbest thing I have read in a long time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If you could change a law of act of parliament what would it be and why ?

Also if you could introduce one and why ?

I guess it would have to be to change our firearms laws to match the USA

no brainer really.

Thats the dumbest thing I have read in a long time "

you not like firearms lassy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"If you could change a law of act of parliament what would it be and why ?

Also if you could introduce one and why ?

I guess it would have to be to change our firearms laws to match the USA

no brainer really.

Thats the dumbest thing I have read in a long time "

Well there are two parts, one is the sentiment that they probably object to, but the second is the practicality. There isn't a single set of firearms laws across the US, there is a mixture of federal, state and local laws. For example you probably wouldn't want California's firearm laws.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If you could change a law of act of parliament what would it be and why ?

Also if you could introduce one and why ?

I guess it would have to be to change our firearms laws to match the USA

no brainer really.

Thats the dumbest thing I have read in a long time

Well there are two parts, one is the sentiment that they probably object to, but the second is the practicality. There isn't a single set of firearms laws across the US, there is a mixture of federal, state and local laws. For example you probably wouldn't want California's firearm laws."

we need another Firearms thread

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Assumung the article I read last week, I'd change that law in Scotland whereby a murderer can remain the beneficiary and executor of the will of the person he's murdered

Ginger

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Assumung the article I read last week, I'd change that law in Scotland whereby a murderer can remain the beneficiary and executor of the will of the person he's murdered

Ginger "

*Article I read was correct

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If you could change a law of act of parliament what would it be and why ?

Also if you could introduce one and why ?

I guess it would have to be to change our firearms laws to match the USA

no brainer really.

Thats the dumbest thing I have read in a long time

you not like firearms lassy"

Not in the general population no, why is that what you would like wee man !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oredShitlessxxxCouple
over a year ago

luton


"I would change the law that says, if you own rental properties, they don't have to be habitable to be inhabited... I mean wtf is that about?!?! "

Ive come across this, harsh springs to mind. The Pendulum of Law has always swayed in either favour over the years tbh.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eedsandyMan
over a year ago

Leeds


"I would change the law that says, if you own rental properties, they don't have to be habitable to be inhabited... I mean wtf is that about?!?!

Ive come across this, harsh springs to mind. The Pendulum of Law has always swayed in either favour over the years tbh. "

Are you serious? A law that says you can rent out a property that is not fit to be lived in? How is that a good thing?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oredShitlessxxxCouple
over a year ago

luton


"I would change the law that says, if you own rental properties, they don't have to be habitable to be inhabited... I mean wtf is that about?!?!

Ive come across this, harsh springs to mind. The Pendulum of Law has always swayed in either favour over the years tbh.

Are you serious? A law that says you can rent out a property that is not fit to be lived in? How is that a good thing?"

Honestly, its true! I studied Law and covered all the 7 areas required by the SRA for a Law degree, one area being Land Law,Equity and Trusts. Its an extremelly complexed area of Law as it kinda works on a parrallel level with Contractual agreements also. (Hence why if its contractually agreed to, then its all good lol it could be a shit hole in theory).

Bare in mind that most courses/modules can/do provide a succint overview of such. In the Legal Module of Land Law,Equity and Trusts all they actually say is that it is akin to a Jigsaw Puzzle ... lol

PS.... i aced it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eedsandyMan
over a year ago

Leeds

What is your point? I don't understand what you are saying.

The point was - Is the law requiring a rental property to be habitable - i.e. fit for someone to live in, a good one?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oredShitlessxxxCouple
over a year ago

luton


"What is your point? I don't understand what you are saying.

The point was - Is the law requiring a rental property to be habitable - i.e. fit for someone to live in, a good one?"

Only for purposes of Gas Safety/Electrical fixtures... but the rest can be a shit hole tbh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eedsandyMan
over a year ago

Leeds

Are you saying that is the law, or it should be the law?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oredShitlessxxxCouple
over a year ago

luton


"Are you saying that is the law, or it should be the law?"

It is the Law...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eedsandyMan
over a year ago

Leeds

No it isn't the law!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oredShitlessxxxCouple
over a year ago

luton


"No it isn't the law!"

Ok you know best...!!! Guess i wasted 5 years of study and a very intense Law exam on Land Law.

Its cool fella, im not here to change your mind. Just trying to chat and help tbh.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eedsandyMan
over a year ago

Leeds

Land Law is nothing to do with it! They don't teach you that in Land Law!

And if you think that the Environmental Health Department of the Council can only issue enforcement notices for gas appliances and the like, then you are seriously mistaken.

Missing handrails, ill-fitting windows, inadequate kitchen, inadequate heating are all things that they can insist on being rectified to make the house habitable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oredShitlessxxxCouple
over a year ago

luton


"Land Law is nothing to do with it! They don't teach you that in Land Law!

And if you think that the Environmental Health Department of the Council can only issue enforcement notices for gas appliances and the like, then you are seriously mistaken.

Missing handrails, ill-fitting windows, inadequate kitchen, inadequate heating are all things that they can insist on being rectified to make the house habitable."

Ok... try and enforce it in a court, when you have Contractually agreed to rent a property with no hand rails...

Its a complexed area mate, please trust me!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eedsandyMan
over a year ago

Leeds

Trust me. You are talking nonsense.

You can put what you like in the tenancy agreement, but if the law says something else, then the law prevails.

I can put in a tenancy agreement that the tenant has to repair the gutters at the house, but the fact is that is illegal, and I can never enforce it.

In the same way, if I rent a house without a handrail on the stairs, it is not fit for human habitation, the tenant can complain to Environmental Health and they can force me to do those repairs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Success !!!

Got a thread going with no mention of the B Word ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vbride1963TV/TS
over a year ago

E.K . Glasgow


"Success !!!

Got a thread going with no mention of the B Word ??"

BOOBIES

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oredShitlessxxxCouple
over a year ago

luton

Sorry you are wrong, but right at the same time... Grr Law is complexed. True that you or anyone can give more than that is required by Law, but not less!!! Employer or Landlord etc

So it comes down to a Contractual agreement (does it not? As i said above) if they want to give you more than the minimal requirements stipulated in the statuatory Law, they can.... but they dont have too!!!

As Long as the strict Statuatory requirements are met with, ie Gas and Electric provisions are covered etc then if a person rents a house knowingly that it has no windows even .... then its a legal contractual agreement and therefore legal... tenant would have no argument!!!

Anyway, im going to bed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eedsandyMan
over a year ago

Leeds

You are talking absolute nonsense. Next time you want to pretend to be a lawyer, maybe read the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985. Start with Section 11.

Oh and maybe don't tell people that Landlord & Tenant Law is covered in Land Law lectures.

Oh and don't tell people that the SRA are responsible for law degrees.

Then you won't look so stupid!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oredShitlessxxxCouple
over a year ago

luton


"You are talking absolute nonsense. Next time you want to pretend to be a lawyer, maybe read the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985. Start with Section 11.

Oh and maybe don't tell people that Landlord & Tenant Law is covered in Land Law lectures.

Oh and don't tell people that the SRA are responsible for law degrees.

Then you won't look so stupid!

"

SRA stipulate the required fields of Law to make up a qualifying Law Degree.

What you on about? Anyhoo have fun fella and enjoy the test of your night on Google!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *eedsandyMan
over a year ago

Leeds

Qualifying for what? You can take a law degree and then not become a lawyer. And what do the SRA have to do with the Bar, ILEX or Licensed Conveyancers?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top