Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff " Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. " where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing." hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all "Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
"Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years..... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
"Your actions say different...and you8r comments tbh...but hey ho stay in denial | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years....."Says the person blaming Labour for things that happened 8 YEARS AGO...whicg i correct...and even more blantant over 60 YEARs ago....lool fools  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Your actions say different...and you8r comments tbh...but hey ho stay in denial "I'm not in denial. Voting to leave the EU doesn't mean you have to vote UKIP. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Your actions say different...and you8r comments tbh...but hey ho stay in denial
I'm not in denial.
Voting to leave the EU doesn't mean you have to vote UKIP."Failing to condemn them means you think along there lines...read your comments | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main point is that in 2018 should we be having this sort of behaviour? By now racism should have been totally eradicated!" No we shouldn't be having this sort of behaviour. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Your actions say different...and you8r comments tbh...but hey ho stay in denial
I'm not in denial.
Voting to leave the EU doesn't mean you have to vote UKIP.
Failing to condemn them means you think along there lines...read your comments"So far on this thread you have failed to condemn the comments Ms Marney posted on Twitter. By your reckoning above that means you think along her lines. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Your actions say different...and you8r comments tbh...but hey ho stay in denial
I'm not in denial.
Voting to leave the EU doesn't mean you have to vote UKIP.
Failing to condemn them means you think along there lines...read your comments
So far on this thread you have failed to condemn the comments Ms Marney posted on Twitter.
By your reckoning above that means you think along her lines."I think you know my views on Kippers thats why you keep on trying to call me out | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Your actions say different...and you8r comments tbh...but hey ho stay in denial
I'm not in denial.
Voting to leave the EU doesn't mean you have to vote UKIP.
Failing to condemn them means you think along there lines...read your comments
So far on this thread you have failed to condemn the comments Ms Marney posted on Twitter.
By your reckoning above that means you think along her lines.
I think you know my views on Kippers thats why you keep on trying to call me out "Your problem is that anyone who doesn't agree with you is either a Kipper, a racist or stupid. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Your actions say different...and you8r comments tbh...but hey ho stay in denial
I'm not in denial.
Voting to leave the EU doesn't mean you have to vote UKIP.
Failing to condemn them means you think along there lines...read your comments
So far on this thread you have failed to condemn the comments Ms Marney posted on Twitter.
By your reckoning above that means you think along her lines.
I think you know my views on Kippers thats why you keep on trying to call me out
Your problem is that anyone who doesn't agree with you is either a Kipper, a racist or stupid.
"Thats because they mainly are | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years.....
Says the person blaming Labour for things that happened 8 YEARS AGO...whicg i correct...and even more blantant over 60 YEARs ago....lool fools "Who else would you blame for things that happened 8 years ago labour were in power | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years.....
Says the person blaming Labour for things that happened 8 YEARS AGO...whicg i correct...and even more blantant over 60 YEARs ago....lool fools
Who else would you blame for things that happened 8 years ago labour were in power"They ment what was happening NOW lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years.....
Says the person blaming Labour for things that happened 8 YEARS AGO...whicg i correct...and even more blantant over 60 YEARs ago....lool fools
Who else would you blame for things that happened 8 years ago labour were in power
They ment what was happening NOW lol "Yes undoubtedly brown and darlings spending left us in a huge mess but i think its plain ridiculous to still use it as an excuse some 8 years later | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years.....
Says the person blaming Labour for things that happened 8 YEARS AGO...whicg i correct...and even more blantant over 60 YEARs ago....lool fools
Who else would you blame for things that happened 8 years ago labour were in power
They ment what was happening NOW lol
Yes undoubtedly brown and darlings spending left us in a huge mess but i think its plain ridiculous to still use it as an excuse some 8 years later"What a load of crap...the Tories above any other party have done this and have borrowed twice as much as brown has... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years.....
Says the person blaming Labour for things that happened 8 YEARS AGO...whicg i correct...and even more blantant over 60 YEARs ago....lool fools
Who else would you blame for things that happened 8 years ago labour were in power
They ment what was happening NOW lol
Yes undoubtedly brown and darlings spending left us in a huge mess but i think its plain ridiculous to still use it as an excuse some 8 years later
What a load of crap...the Tories above any other party have done this and have borrowed twice as much as brown has..."So browns three years as pm he borrowed roughly 334 bn camerons first thre years 300bn and as a percentage of gdp less than brown aswell so wheres the twice as much | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years.....
Says the person blaming Labour for things that happened 8 YEARS AGO...whicg i correct...and even more blantant over 60 YEARs ago....lool fools
Who else would you blame for things that happened 8 years ago labour were in power
They ment what was happening NOW lol
Yes undoubtedly brown and darlings spending left us in a huge mess but i think its plain ridiculous to still use it as an excuse some 8 years later
What a load of crap...the Tories above any other party have done this and have borrowed twice as much as brown has...
So browns three years as pm he borrowed roughly 334 bn camerons first thre years 300bn and as a percentage of gdp less than brown aswell so wheres the twice as much"what has that got to do with the thread? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years.....
Says the person blaming Labour for things that happened 8 YEARS AGO...whicg i correct...and even more blantant over 60 YEARs ago....lool fools
Who else would you blame for things that happened 8 years ago labour were in power
They ment what was happening NOW lol
Yes undoubtedly brown and darlings spending left us in a huge mess but i think its plain ridiculous to still use it as an excuse some 8 years later
What a load of crap...the Tories above any other party have done this and have borrowed twice as much as brown has...
So browns three years as pm he borrowed roughly 334 bn camerons first thre years 300bn and as a percentage of gdp less than brown aswell so wheres the twice as much
what has that got to do with the thread? "Yeah sorry went off on a tangent there | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ukip in trouble again over racist remarks. Leaders girl friend suspended over tweets about Megan Markle. She will "taint" royal family, black people are ugly and have small brains. Obviously been talking to Donny. Shameful! " . Is this the story in the daily mail? You know there not to be trusted  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years.....
Says the person blaming Labour for things that happened 8 YEARS AGO...whicg i correct...and even more blantant over 60 YEARs ago....lool fools "I did no such thing actually. Someone quoted a link. That link blamed the post-war Labour government. I pointed this out. ("It also says...") And you said you couldn't be bothered reading the link.... Instead quoting your own 'facts', one of which was that Labour hadn't been in government "for over 10 years". | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No surprises there then...you've seen them on here refusing to condemn stuff Another silly comment! So far nobody on this thread has condemned Jo Marney's tweets. Going from what you've implied above it means you agree with them. where is that implied?? anything that makes those immoral pond life look bad can only be a good thing. hes another Kipper...the title of the thread says it all
Kipper? For someone who deals with facts you have them spectacularly wrong in this particular case.
Also says on another thread that it is a fact that the Tories have been in power for 10 years.....
Says the person blaming Labour for things that happened 8 YEARS AGO...whicg i correct...and even more blantant over 60 YEARs ago....lool fools
I did no such thing actually. Someone quoted a link. That link blamed the post-war Labour government. I pointed this out. ("It also says...")
And you said you couldn't be bothered reading the link....
Instead quoting your own 'facts', one of which was that Labour hadn't been in government "for over 10 years"." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ukip in trouble again over racist remarks. Leaders girl friend suspended over tweets about Megan Markle. She will "taint" royal family, black people are ugly and have small brains. Obviously been talking to Donny. Shameful! . Is this the story in the daily mail? You know there not to be trusted ". No wait silly me, this is obviously a true story by the daily fail because the story is one you like | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The main point is that in 2018 should we be having this sort of behaviour? By now racism should have been totally eradicated!" Sadly that'll never happen. The ideas and ideaologies, both social and political will always exist, books, internet, peoples minds. The good news though is that now the social repercutions for expressing such views are pretty damning in themselves. Think of what any future employer will think of her. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ukip in trouble again over racist remarks. Leaders girl friend suspended over tweets about Megan Markle. She will "taint" royal family, black people are ugly and have small brains. Obviously been talking to Donny. Shameful! . Is this the story in the daily mail? You know there not to be trusted .
No wait silly me, this is obviously a true story by the daily fail because the story is one you like "Seeing as the defense being used is "out of context" and not "completely untrue", which means the person involved is admitting it happened, I think you can give this little pantomime a rest. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ukip in trouble again over racist remarks. Leaders girl friend suspended over tweets about Megan Markle. She will "taint" royal family, black people are ugly and have small brains. Obviously been talking to Donny. Shameful! . Is this the story in the daily mail? You know there not to be trusted .
No wait silly me, this is obviously a true story by the daily fail because the story is one you like
Seeing as the defense being used is "out of context" and not "completely untrue", which means the person involved is admitting it happened, I think you can give this little pantomime a rest.". So your saying the daily fail is reporting a true story? Lordy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ukip in trouble again over racist remarks. Leaders girl friend suspended over tweets about Megan Markle. She will "taint" royal family, black people are ugly and have small brains. Obviously been talking to Donny. Shameful! . Is this the story in the daily mail? You know there not to be trusted "The same Daily Mail that is now available for purchase on Virgin Trains again since Richard Branson ordered the ban on the Daily Mail to be lifted today. That Daily Mail? Richard Branson said that the ban on the Daily Mail on Virgin Trains had been a PR Disaster for Virgin Trains. That Daily Mail? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ukip in trouble again over racist remarks. Leaders girl friend suspended over tweets about Megan Markle. She will "taint" royal family, black people are ugly and have small brains. Obviously been talking to Donny. Shameful! . Is this the story in the daily mail? You know there not to be trusted .
No wait silly me, this is obviously a true story by the daily fail because the story is one you like
Seeing as the defense being used is "out of context" and not "completely untrue", which means the person involved is admitting it happened, I think you can give this little pantomime a rest..
So your saying the daily fail is reporting a true story? Lordy"I certainly hope you've got a fainting couch nearby. Seems like you have a case of the vapours. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ukip in trouble again over racist remarks. Leaders girl friend suspended over tweets about Megan Markle. She will "taint" royal family, black people are ugly and have small brains. Obviously been talking to Donny. Shameful! . Is this the story in the daily mail? You know there not to be trusted
The same Daily Mail that is now available for purchase on Virgin Trains again since Richard Branson ordered the ban on the Daily Mail to be lifted today. That Daily Mail?
Richard Branson said that the ban on the Daily Mail on Virgin Trains had been a PR Disaster for Virgin Trains. That Daily Mail? "No. The other daily mail. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ukip in trouble again over racist remarks. Leaders girl friend suspended over tweets about Megan Markle. She will "taint" royal family, black people are ugly and have small brains. Obviously been talking to Donny. Shameful! . Is this the story in the daily mail? You know there not to be trusted
The same Daily Mail that is now available for purchase on Virgin Trains again since Richard Branson ordered the ban on the Daily Mail to be lifted today. That Daily Mail?
Richard Branson said that the ban on the Daily Mail on Virgin Trains had been a PR Disaster for Virgin Trains. That Daily Mail? "Don't see Richard Branson admitting to it being a PR disaster...but then im guessing your quoting the Daily Fail. heres Virgins press release...and tbh its old news seen as it was removed in November...more spin from you yet again i suspect When Virgin Trains took the decision back in November to remove the Daily Mail from sale, it was not part of some grand campaign or at my behest – indeed Brian Souter and I were not aware of the decision until we read the media reports this week. The decision was made in response to feedback from some of our Virgin Trains employees. Brian and I respect our people when they make decisions and we listen to their views. It is the way we have always run our companies. But we must also listen to the concerns voiced widely this week – by those who agree with the Mail’s editorial stance and those who vehemently disagree with it – that this move has been seen as censorship. Freedom of speech, freedom of choice and tolerance for differing views are the core principles of any free and open society. While Virgin Trains has always said that their passengers are free to read whatever newspaper they choose on board West Coast trains, it is clear that on this occasion the decision to no longer sell The Mail has not been seen to live up to these principles. Brian and I agree that we must not ever be seen to be censoring what our customers read and influencing their freedom of choice. Nor must we be seen to be moralising on behalf of others. Instead we should stand up for the values we hold dear and defend them publicly, as I have done with the Mail on many issues over the years. So Brian and I have instructed our team at Virgin Trains to reconsider this decision and re-stock the Daily Mail while they undertake a full review of their sales policy, making clear that this policy should not single out individual media titles. No mention of a PR disaster there  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
