FabSwingers.com forum: For anyone who wants to know why bernie sanders lost the democratic nomination

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the

DNC.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

Was it anything to do with the number of votes cast by party members?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Was it anything to do with the number of votes cast by party members? "
.

No your confused, that was brexit

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm certain this will clear up why the candidate with less delegates than the other was the real winner, only to be denied by pesky math.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Neo liberal logic At it's best Hillary won fair and square but trump cheated his way into power..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"I'm certain this will clear up why the candidate with less delegates than the other was the real winner, only to be denied by pesky math."

Perhaps a good opportunity to highlight the difference between a representative and a delegate?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I mean.. Even Donna brazile thinks it's "money laundering" and illegal under FEC law.

It can't be true though as the FBI haven't investigated her

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

It has been an open secret for the last year that the DNC was stuffed with pro corporate pro Clinton delegates just as the NEC of the Labour Party has been filled with Blairite centrists. It is also an open secret that there is a war for the heart and soul of both parties between the corporate centrists and the progressives. Unfortunately on the other side of the pond corporate money is winning the war.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"It has been an open secret for the last year that the DNC was stuffed with pro corporate pro Clinton delegates just as the NEC of the Labour Party has been filled with Blairite centrists. It is also an open secret that there is a war for the heart and soul of both parties between the corporate centrists and the progressives. Unfortunately on the other side of the pond corporate money is winning the war."
.

Kaboom.... Money has control of both sides of the coin, heads or tails, you lose

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Surprising absolutely fucking nobody, the staff of the DNC had more time for the person that had been a longtime party member that knew they could work with and not the Vermont senator who had only just joined the party and seemed to have no interest in working with them.

But that's the real reason Bernie lost, and not that he ran a shit campaign that couldn't get enough delegates.

Because reasons.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Surprising absolutely fucking nobody, the staff of the DNC had more time for the person that had been a longtime party member that knew they could work with and not the Vermont senator who had only just joined the party and seemed to have no interest in working with them.

But that's the real reason Bernie lost, and not that he ran a shit campaign that couldn't get enough delegates.

Because reasons. "
.

So it's riddled with cronyism as well

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm beginning to see why trump won now

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

But that's the real reason Bernie lost, and not that he ran a shit campaign that couldn't get enough delegates.

Because reasons. .

So it's riddled with cronyism as well

Only if you can show that the DNC somehow managed to appointed Hillary as their candidate in spite of her having less qualifications, in this case delegates, than anyone else going for the post.

Of which there were none, because as you may or maynot remember, Bernie conceded before the Democratic National Convention and endorsed Hillary.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

But that's the real reason Bernie lost, and not that he ran a shit campaign that couldn't get enough delegates.

Because reasons. .

So it's riddled with cronyism as well

Only if you can show that the DNC somehow managed to appointed Hillary as their candidate in spite of her having less qualifications, in this case delegates, than anyone else going for the post.

Of which there were none, because as you may or maynot remember, Bernie conceded before the Democratic National Convention and endorsed Hillary. "
.

Lolololol.... In your rush to defend her You wrote the very definition of cronyism for your reasons why they wanted Clinton, your obviously a big lefty back slapping cronyism fan boy yourself hey

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The type who likes to talk the good talk while warming up your hands hey.... Have no fear my dear, I'm a cronie!!! We like to keep it all Hush Hush

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

But that's the real reason Bernie lost, and not that he ran a shit campaign that couldn't get enough delegates.

Because reasons. .

So it's riddled with cronyism as well

Only if you can show that the DNC somehow managed to appointed Hillary as their candidate in spite of her having less qualifications, in this case delegates, than anyone else going for the post.

Of which there were none, because as you may or maynot remember, Bernie conceded before the Democratic National Convention and endorsed Hillary. .

Lolololol.... In your rush to defend her You wrote the very definition of cronyism for your reasons why they wanted Clinton, your obviously a big lefty back slapping cronyism fan boy yourself hey

Nope.

I spelled out that it was no secret that people within the DNC would rather Hillary win the nomination. It was even in some of the leaked DNC emails.

And there's nothing wrong with that. People have preferences.

The only way it could become cronyism is if they then gave her the job of presidential candidate.

Which they didn't.

So, you might want to reconsider your above comments, as you are demonstrably wrong.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

But that's the real reason Bernie lost, and not that he ran a shit campaign that couldn't get enough delegates.

Because reasons. .

So it's riddled with cronyism as well

Only if you can show that the DNC somehow managed to appointed Hillary as their candidate in spite of her having less qualifications, in this case delegates, than anyone else going for the post.

Of which there were none, because as you may or maynot remember, Bernie conceded before the Democratic National Convention and endorsed Hillary. .

Lolololol.... In your rush to defend her You wrote the very definition of cronyism for your reasons why they wanted Clinton, your obviously a big lefty back slapping cronyism fan boy yourself hey

Nope.

I spelled out that it was no secret that people within the DNC would rather Hillary win the nomination. It was even in some of the leaked DNC emails.

And there's nothing wrong with that. People have preferences.

The only way it could become cronyism is if they then gave her the job of presidential candidate.

Which they didn't.

So, you might want to reconsider your above comments, as you are demonstrably wrong."
.

Hehe, you even said leaked emails... Surely you mean Russian hacked

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I know what I said.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know what I said."
.

You know when they said they supported Hillary coz she got more votes, errr well that would make sense except they were favouring Hillary even before anybody had voted.

They had their candidate from the beginning because the candidates "team" was running the DNC from the start

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I know what I said..

You know when they said they supported Hillary coz she got more votes, errr well that would make sense except they were favouring Hillary even before anybody had voted.

They had their candidate from the beginning because the candidates "team" was running the DNC from the start

No, in said Hilary won the nomination because she got more votes and by such a margin that Bernie conceded.

I also said that it was no secret that many in the DNC had a candidate they preferred.

Where you fall down is conflating the second thing with the outcome of the first.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Try reading what Donna brazile said in the article.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Try reading what Donna brazile said in the article."

Why don't you demonstrate that you've understood what you've read, and make your argument, not defer to someone else's.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Try reading what Donna brazile said in the article.

Why don't you demonstrate that you've understood what you've read, and make your argument, not defer to someone else's."
.

Waaaa ....waaaa .....waaaa

Somebody pass him his dummy for Allah's sake

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

"Only if you can show that the DNC somehow managed to appointed Hillary as their candidate in spite of her having less qualifications, in this case delegates, than anyone else going for the post.

Of which there were none, because as you may or maynot remember, Bernie conceded before the Democratic National Convention and endorsed Hillary. "

DNC records show they diverted funds to the Clinton nomination campaign that should have been split equally between the 2 candidates, and remember they supplied Clinton with the questions to be asked at the nomination debates so she could research all the answers prior and gain an unfair advantage.

https://youtu.be/_hSIIv0McO4

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

But more people voted for hilary than Bernie, right?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Only if you can show that the DNC somehow managed to appointed Hillary as their candidate in spite of her having less qualifications, in this case delegates, than anyone else going for the post.

Of which there were none, because as you may or maynot remember, Bernie conceded before the Democratic National Convention and endorsed Hillary.

https://youtu.be/_hSIIv0McO4"

The person who supplied the question was fired, and the question was about water quality in Flint, Michigan, while in Flint, Michigan.

If you weren't ready for that fucking question anyway, you should just have gone home.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

"But more people voted for hilary than Bernie, right? "

Guess it is easy to ace any interview or exam if you're the only one given the questions ahead of time...

I know that if I were voting for a leader and one knew all the relevant facts about every issue they were asked about and the others did not I would vote for the one with the knowing. I bet you would too...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"But more people voted for hilary than Bernie, right?

Guess it is easy to ace any interview or exam if you're the only one given the questions ahead of time...

Logic and facts! Lordy lordy what next.... Common sense

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"But more people voted for hilary than Bernie, right?

Guess it is easy to ace any interview or exam if you're the only one given the questions ahead of time...

This is a really weird tact to take, because it rests on that daft notion that the only reason that Hillary Clinton came across as prepared and competent was because she was "given the questions beforehand" which only works if you ignore her entire career of being a competent and prepared policy wonk.

I guess that it's unfathomable that a woman could be that good at her chosen profession.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I guess that it's unfathomable that a woman could be that good at her chosen profession. "
.

What you mean like Theresa may?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I guess that it's unfathomable that a woman could be that good at her chosen profession. .

What you mean like Theresa may?

I see you've managed to identify that both Hillary Clinton and Theresa May are women.

Good job.

Now here's the thing: Hillary wasn't good at chosen profession because she's a woman, in the same way the Theresa May isn't bad at hers because she's a woman.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uxinteriorMan
over a year ago

south west , continental

Interesting how this story is gaining momentum, The BBC and CNN are even reporting that Hillary Clinton had the Democratic party in her pocket! Now dont tell me that's fake news now.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Podesta will be next for hauling in I expect and hopefully followed by Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You'd be doing well to explain why.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You'd be doing well to explain why."
.

The latter for breaking FEC rules.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"You'd be doing well to explain why..

The latter for breaking FEC rules.

Good luck with that...

And the former?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uxinteriorMan
over a year ago

south west , continental

I am really enjoying the implosion tour Hillary Clinton swanning around on her shifty book tour pulling the wool over everyone's eyes! "Poor poor me look how I should have been president!"

Unbelievable, the whole lot of them are rotten to the core, and folk really fall for it! Weasels!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uxinteriorMan
over a year ago

south west , continental

I'm just thinking can we rename the politics thread humour!

Politicians and honesty, well it's a joke!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I'm just thinking can we rename the politics thread humour!

Politicians and honesty, well it's a joke!"

What cutting insight you have.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uxinteriorMan
over a year ago

south west , continental

"I'm just thinking can we rename the politics thread humour!

Politicians and honesty, well it's a joke!

What cutting insight you have. "

Yes it serves me well

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Except that the NEC has been completely taken over by momentum Marxists.....other than that you’re pretty close!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

"
.

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

Don't listen to what #demonjohnsays.. He should take a look at that DNC convention before he rattles on about it as if he knows anything.... The place was awash with Bernie blue signs, he couldn't even get to say anything for four minutes because the entire convention was just chanting Bernie Bernie Bernie!.

Sponsored by Qualcomm and wells Fargo, yea you know, the wells Fargo who stole from its own customers, cheated and lied... It's like they wanted a candidate with shared morals and they bought one in Hillary Clinton.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

Well you never answered the question, did Hilary win because more party members voted for her?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

Well you never answered the question, did Hilary win because more party members voted for her? "
.

Did brexit get more votes than remain?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat"

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

Well you never answered the question, did Hilary win because more party members voted for her? .

Did brexit get more votes than remain?"

Yes

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

She got 7 million less votes than barrack Obama.....7 million people couldn't be arsed turning out for her!.... Because she's a shit candidate who offers people no change.

She lost trump won.

Case closed

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"She got 7 million less votes than barrack Obama.....7 million people couldn't be arsed turning out for her!.... Because she's a shit candidate who offers people no change.

She lost trump won.

Case closed"

She got more votes than trump.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"She got 7 million less votes than barrack Obama.....7 million people couldn't be arsed turning out for her!.... Because she's a shit candidate who offers people no change.

She lost trump won.

Case closed

She got more votes than trump. "
.

Is she in power?.

No.

She lost because she's a shit candidate that 7 million didn't want to vote for.... Get over it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"She got 7 million less votes than barrack Obama.....7 million people couldn't be arsed turning out for her!.... Because she's a shit candidate who offers people no change.

She lost trump won.

Case closed

She got more votes than trump. .

Is she in power?.

No.

She lost because she's a shit candidate that 7 million didn't want to vote for.... Get over it"

So only 7m voted for trump or abstained? Hmm, I wasn't aware of that. Doesn't seem like a lot.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"She got 7 million less votes than barrack Obama.....7 million people couldn't be arsed turning out for her!.... Because she's a shit candidate who offers people no change.

She lost trump won.

Case closed

She got more votes than trump. .

Is she in power?.

No.

She lost because she's a shit candidate that 7 million didn't want to vote for.... Get over it

So only 7m voted for trump or abstained? Hmm, I wasn't aware of that. Doesn't seem like a lot."
.

You've lost the argument just like she lost the presidency... Get over it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"She got 7 million less votes than barrack Obama.....7 million people couldn't be arsed turning out for her!.... Because she's a shit candidate who offers people no change.

She lost trump won.

Case closed

She got more votes than trump. .

Is she in power?.

No.

She lost because she's a shit candidate that 7 million didn't want to vote for.... Get over it

So only 7m voted for trump or abstained? Hmm, I wasn't aware of that. Doesn't seem like a lot..

You've lost the argument just like she lost the presidency... Get over it"

I don't know why you are aiming such comments at me, rather than the OP, as the whole thread is about Sanders losing the nomination?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"She got 7 million less votes than barrack Obama.....7 million people couldn't be arsed turning out for her!.... Because she's a shit candidate who offers people no change.

She lost trump won.

Case closed

She got more votes than trump. .

Is she in power?.

No.

She lost because she's a shit candidate that 7 million didn't want to vote for.... Get over it

So only 7m voted for trump or abstained? Hmm, I wasn't aware of that. Doesn't seem like a lot..

You've lost the argument just like she lost the presidency... Get over it

I don't know why you are aiming such comments at me, rather than the OP, as the whole thread is about Sanders losing the nomination? "
.

Lost it through corruption in the DNC which Clinton had bought off after neglect by Obama had left it deep in debt

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Last year I was a conspiracy theorist for suggesting that the DNC was completely corrupt and colluding to give you a candidate that the money wanted you to have!!.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Debbie Wasserman Schultz could go on fake news CNN and declare on TV that Bernie fans were just as bad as trump fans and that "the DNC is completely neutral as required by DNC rules" .

And CNN asked no questions at all because CNN are part of the money that want to give you Hillary Clinton sponsored by Wells Fargo

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Marc Elias, Clinton's lawyer had a document that said...

"For raising money for the DNC Hillary Clinton will have full control of finances, strategy and all money raised".

And still declare on CNN and MSNBC that the DNC are completely neutral as required by its own rules.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They them set out "money laundering' of donations that broke FEC rules of a maximum of 2700 dollars by slushing money from three different funds one of which was set out for state level and one for the eventual winner but all funneled into Hillary hands and leaving the DNC bankrupt yet again.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hillary fucking Clinton.... The only candidate more fucking corrupt than Donald trump.

Jesus why an earth couldn't she win???

It's a total fucking mystery

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Jesus wept, just get a fucking blog will you?

That's the appropriate format if all you're going to do is spam every abortive thought you have.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Jesus wept, just get a fucking blog will you?

That's the appropriate format if all you're going to do is spam every abortive thought you have.

"
.

Back under your bridge troll

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?"
.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

"Except that the NEC has been completely taken over by momentum Marxists.....other than that you’re pretty close!"

You see that's just the sort of thing I expect to hear from someone totally indoctrinated by the ultra right.

Firstly, we on the left have just managed to get 2 delegates elected onto the NEC, it will take many years to remove all the Tory enterist, centrist Blairites who believe that anything slightly to left of the tories (no matter how fascist their policies are) is socialist.

Secondly none of us (even those who believe that Marxist theory is our best hope for survival as a species) are advocating state capitalism because we understand as a species we too greedy and are not ready for it yet. We are advocating a mixed economy where British services are held in trust by the UK state and run for the benefit of the British people and British residents.

I note you are firmly against this, I wonder why? Could it have anything to do with you living in Germany and at present a lot of British services are controlled by private companies owned by the German state and run for the benefit of the German population of which you are one?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?"
.

July sometime

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What date was on the email from podesta saying that internal polling research done by the DNC suggests that Clinton's weakest point was her links with the Russian uranium scandal in which several individuals from the Russian company had slushed 145 million through the Clinton Foundation?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?.

July sometime

Iowa voted 1st Feb. New Hampshire 9th Feb. Nevada 20th Feb. South Carolina 27th Feb. Then 11 states and 1 territory voted on Super Tuesday, 1st March.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Jesus wept, just get a fucking blog will you?

That's the appropriate format if all you're going to do is spam every abortive thought you have.

Back under your bridge troll

Still banging that drum, eh? Good luck with that.

Of course, none of this whining about the primaries does seem to ignore that Hillary Clinton won the nomination because more people voted for her.

Something that gets glossed over when Bernie Bros start to make excuses about why their preferred candidate did so badly.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Which Russian bank was Paul manafort using for Ukrainian money laundering? Same one represented by podesta, who did Paul manafort launder a million dollars for? Podesta?... Who ran Hillary's campaign podesta?.

It's a big fuck off wealthy club which goes round and round and round

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?.

July sometime

Iowa voted 1st Feb. New Hampshire 9th Feb. Nevada 20th Feb. South Carolina 27th Feb. Then 11 states and 1 territory voted on Super Tuesday, 1st March. "
.

This goes back to 2015 when Obama was still in office.

Get with the programme

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Which Russian bank was Paul manafort using for Ukrainian money laundering? Same one represented by podesta, who did Paul manafort launder a million dollars for? Podesta?... Who ran Hillary's campaign podesta?.

It's a big fuck off wealthy club which goes round and round and round"

John Podesta is not the same person as Tony Podesta

You can tell this, because they've got different first names.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I wouldn't be surprised to find out some of the millions Hillary used to bail out the DNC was from the Clinton Foundation which was taking 145 million from Russian individuals...

Sure it's not proven dodgy but then trump ain't either

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I wouldn't be surprised to find out some of the millions Hillary used to bail out the DNC was from the Clinton Foundation which was taking 145 million from Russian individuals...

Sure it's not proven dodgy but then trump ain't either

Ahh, the transitive properties of unfounded suspicion.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a big fuck off wealthy club which goes round and round and round

John Podesta is not the same person as Tony Podesta

You can tell this, because they've got different first names."
.

Oh yes because the brothers who run and own the podesta group wouldn't be aware of anything going on in the firm they errr own

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I wouldn't be surprised to find out some of the millions Hillary used to bail out the DNC was from the Clinton Foundation which was taking 145 million from Russian individuals...

Sure it's not proven dodgy but then trump ain't either

Ahh, the transitive properties of unfounded suspicion."
.

Same ones that you like to talk about with trump

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a big fuck off wealthy club which goes round and round and round

John Podesta is not the same person as Tony Podesta

You can tell this, because they've got different first names..

Oh yes because the brothers who run and own the podesta group wouldn't be aware of anything going on in the firm they errr own

Seeing as you're conflating the two, I felt it best you were corrected.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Unless you have something concrete on trump that nobody else has?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?.

July sometime

Iowa voted 1st Feb. New Hampshire 9th Feb. Nevada 20th Feb. South Carolina 27th Feb. Then 11 states and 1 territory voted on Super Tuesday, 1st March. .

This goes back to 2015 when Obama was still in office.

Get with the programme

All the states had already voted before the convention. They could have held it in the "Clinton for President" convention centre and it wouldn't make a difference, the votes had been cast.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I wouldn't be surprised to find out some of the millions Hillary used to bail out the DNC was from the Clinton Foundation which was taking 145 million from Russian individuals...

Sure it's not proven dodgy but then trump ain't either

Ahh, the transitive properties of unfounded suspicion..

Same ones that you like to talk about with trump

Feel free to be as specific as you want when backing this one up.

I'll wait.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a big fuck off wealthy club which goes round and round and round

John Podesta is not the same person as Tony Podesta

You can tell this, because they've got different first names..

Oh yes because the brothers who run and own the podesta group wouldn't be aware of anything going on in the firm they errr own

Seeing as you're conflating the two, I felt it best you were corrected."
.

Yes coz one Koch brother doesn't have a clue what the Koch brother is up too.

Yea... Seems plausible, if you tilt your head and look through one eye

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?.

July sometime

Iowa voted 1st Feb. New Hampshire 9th Feb. Nevada 20th Feb. South Carolina 27th Feb. Then 11 states and 1 territory voted on Super Tuesday, 1st March. .

This goes back to 2015 when Obama was still in office.

Get with the programme

All the states had already voted before the convention. They could have held it in the "Clinton for President" convention centre and it wouldn't make a difference, the votes had been cast. "
.

Bejesus man, at least read what Donna brazile wrote, it was going on way before the convention

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a big fuck off wealthy club which goes round and round and round

John Podesta is not the same person as Tony Podesta

You can tell this, because they've got different first names..

Oh yes because the brothers who run and own the podesta group wouldn't be aware of anything going on in the firm they errr own

Seeing as you're conflating the two, I felt it best you were corrected..

Yes coz one Koch brother doesn't have a clue what the Koch brother is up too.

Yea... Seems plausible, if you tilt your head and look through one eye

And the Loch brothers aren't the same people as the Podesta brothers. We can tell this, by their different surnames.

Now, do you have anything substantive to say about the topic at hand, which, need I remind you, is that somehow Bernie Sanders was robbed of the nomination as the presidential candidate for the Democratic party, or do you just want to howl at the moon some more?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Rather than post a link to a site, consider making a statement that can be discussed op.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?.

July sometime

Iowa voted 1st Feb. New Hampshire 9th Feb. Nevada 20th Feb. South Carolina 27th Feb. Then 11 states and 1 territory voted on Super Tuesday, 1st March. .

This goes back to 2015 when Obama was still in office.

Get with the programme

All the states had already voted before the convention. They could have held it in the "Clinton for President" convention centre and it wouldn't make a difference, the votes had been cast. .

Bejesus man, at least read what Donna brazile wrote, it was going on way before the convention"

You were the person who brought up the name of the convention centre saying it had influenced the vote! Now it doesn't matter

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?.

July sometime

Iowa voted 1st Feb. New Hampshire 9th Feb. Nevada 20th Feb. South Carolina 27th Feb. Then 11 states and 1 territory voted on Super Tuesday, 1st March. .

This goes back to 2015 when Obama was still in office.

Get with the programme

All the states had already voted before the convention. They could have held it in the "Clinton for President" convention centre and it wouldn't make a difference, the votes had been cast. .

Bejesus man, at least read what Donna brazile wrote, it was going on way before the convention

You were the person who brought up the name of the convention centre saying it had influenced the vote! Now it doesn't matter

"
.

Do you actually read anything?.

You obviously didn't read what I wrote about the convention and it's relevance to #demonjohnsays assumption that the people at the convention was happy with a Clinton victory!!.

Now go away and do a hundred lines.

I shall read what people write

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?.

July sometime

Iowa voted 1st Feb. New Hampshire 9th Feb. Nevada 20th Feb. South Carolina 27th Feb. Then 11 states and 1 territory voted on Super Tuesday, 1st March. .

This goes back to 2015 when Obama was still in office.

Get with the programme

All the states had already voted before the convention. They could have held it in the "Clinton for President" convention centre and it wouldn't make a difference, the votes had been cast. .

Bejesus man, at least read what Donna brazile wrote, it was going on way before the convention

You were the person who brought up the name of the convention centre saying it had influenced the vote! Now it doesn't matter

Do you actually read anything?.

You obviously didn't read what I wrote about the convention and it's relevance to #demonjohnsays assumption that the people at the convention was happy with a Clinton victory!!.

Now go away and do a hundred lines.

I shall read what people write"

You wrote that 0 state primaries had been held before the convention

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Democratic national convention (where the nomination of the presidential candidate happens) is different to the Democratic national committee, where I correctly stated Hillary had many supporters.

While they have the same TLA they're different things, pay more attention.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Will you at least stick to the one profile, it's making me dizzy watching you all flit between them?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As therapy for your split personality... Do one hundred lines.

I shall stick to one persona from now on

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"Will you at least stick to the one profile, it's making me dizzy watching you all flit between them?

Sorry to disappoint, but it's multiple people pointing out your ignorance

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Will you at least stick to the one profile, it's making me dizzy watching you all flit between them?

Yes, you've found me out.

Good job, detective.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Will you at least stick to the one profile, it's making me dizzy watching you all flit between them?

Sorry to disappoint, but it's multiple people pointing out your ignorance "
.

You'll be surprised what putting you all on a hotlist and watching you log off log on log off log on does?.

It's not evidence perse but a bit like Clinton and trump.... It's a bit fucking obvious

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Will you at least stick to the one profile, it's making me dizzy watching you all flit between them?

Sorry to disappoint, but it's multiple people pointing out your ignorance .

You'll be surprised what putting you all on a hotlist and watching you log off log on log off log on does?.

Give you some really stupid ideas?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?.

July sometime

Iowa voted 1st Feb. New Hampshire 9th Feb. Nevada 20th Feb. South Carolina 27th Feb. Then 11 states and 1 territory voted on Super Tuesday, 1st March. .

This goes back to 2015 when Obama was still in office.

Get with the programme

All the states had already voted before the convention. They could have held it in the "Clinton for President" convention centre and it wouldn't make a difference, the votes had been cast. .

Bejesus man, at least read what Donna brazile wrote, it was going on way before the convention

You were the person who brought up the name of the convention centre saying it had influenced the vote! Now it doesn't matter

Do you actually read anything?.

You obviously didn't read what I wrote about the convention and it's relevance to #demonjohnsays assumption that the people at the convention was happy with a Clinton victory!!.

Now go away and do a hundred lines.

I shall read what people write

You wrote that 0 state primaries had been held before the convention

Cat got your tongue?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?.

July sometime

Iowa voted 1st Feb. New Hampshire 9th Feb. Nevada 20th Feb. South Carolina 27th Feb. Then 11 states and 1 territory voted on Super Tuesday, 1st March. .

This goes back to 2015 when Obama was still in office.

Get with the programme

All the states had already voted before the convention. They could have held it in the "Clinton for President" convention centre and it wouldn't make a difference, the votes had been cast. .

Bejesus man, at least read what Donna brazile wrote, it was going on way before the convention

You were the person who brought up the name of the convention centre saying it had influenced the vote! Now it doesn't matter

Do you actually read anything?.

You obviously didn't read what I wrote about the convention and it's relevance to #demonjohnsays assumption that the people at the convention was happy with a Clinton victory!!.

Now go away and do a hundred lines.

I shall read what people write

You wrote that 0 state primaries had been held before the convention

Cat got your tongue? "
.

Oh yes your back.

Yes that was my reply to #demonjohnsays to his question that there was no corruption until the convention and that there'd already voted.

Simply not true, Clinton had taken control of the DNC long before the vast majority of voting had taken place, her money laundering had effectively robbed the DNC and it was being illegally funneled into her own campaign.

The DNC was meant to be impartial according to its own rules but effectively was being run by Clinton for Clinton for the purpose of a Clinton victory

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"From the replies it would appear no one watched the video linked

I saw the Subversion and corruptness from the start.

You reep what you sow, you corrupt self serving liberal wankers... Welcome to trump America and don't blame the fucking Russians or the KKK or racism to appease your own morality.

Everybody with 2 brain cells knows how trump got elected, he got the only candidate he could beat

How many state primaries had already voted by then?

Can you answer this question sick boi?.

What was the date of the convention?.

July sometime

Iowa voted 1st Feb. New Hampshire 9th Feb. Nevada 20th Feb. South Carolina 27th Feb. Then 11 states and 1 territory voted on Super Tuesday, 1st March. .

This goes back to 2015 when Obama was still in office.

Get with the programme

All the states had already voted before the convention. They could have held it in the "Clinton for President" convention centre and it wouldn't make a difference, the votes had been cast. .

Bejesus man, at least read what Donna brazile wrote, it was going on way before the convention

You were the person who brought up the name of the convention centre saying it had influenced the vote! Now it doesn't matter

Do you actually read anything?.

You obviously didn't read what I wrote about the convention and it's relevance to #demonjohnsays assumption that the people at the convention was happy with a Clinton victory!!.

Now go away and do a hundred lines.

I shall read what people write

You wrote that 0 state primaries had been held before the convention

Cat got your tongue? .

Oh yes your back.

Yes that was my reply to #demonjohnsays to his question that there was no corruption until the convention and that there'd already voted.

The DNC was meant to be impartial according to its own rules but effectively was being run by Clinton for Clinton for the purpose of a Clinton victory"

So now you agree that all state primaries had already voted before the convention?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And nobody seems to be able to join up the dots on how the DNC managed to rig the primaries.

Because unless that happened, then all this bluster is just another in a long line of excuses as to why Bernie didn't win.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"And nobody seems to be able to join up the dots on how the DNC managed to rig the primaries.

Because unless that happened, then all this bluster is just another in a long line of excuses as to why Bernie didn't win."

Its clear from their posts they don't even understand that primaries are even held.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

How much better the world would be with Bernie and Jeremy as leaders of their countries.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"And nobody seems to be able to join up the dots on how the DNC managed to rig the primaries.

Because unless that happened, then all this bluster is just another in a long line of excuses as to why Bernie didn't win."
.

Come on... Even cenk on tyt says it was fucking rigged.

You can't get more of a lefty liberal than him

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And that's before we even mention superdelegates,400 of which voted for Hillary before they even knew who the candidate were, let alone their policies.

He won Wyoming by 12 points and lost in the delagate count but somehow the media complain that trump gets less votes but wins the presidency

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If the FBI have got a minute I'd love to see an investigation on the fact that Hillary Clinton exceeded by 7% the exit polling on every state that used electric voting machines that are owned and run by a company that heavily donates to the Clinton Foundation and is run by a former Hillary staffer..... Coz it don't look good especially when you consider that the republican primaries showed little to no difference.... It's like somebody's rigging the fucking system against the people

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's"

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? "
.

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

That doesn't make any sense. How did they know who was going to vote for which candidate in order to make queues for Sanders voters and not Clinton voters? What proof do you have to substantiate your claim that Sanders supporters had to queue for 8hrs?

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders."
.

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Watch "Elizabeth Warren: 'Yes' The Primary Was Rigged Against Bernie" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/brg5e0xhcuE.

And that there is conspiracy which is illegal.

Money laundering... Which is illegal.

Breaking FEC rules.... Which is illegal.

And with a bit of investigation by the FBI I'm pretty sure they could find the evidence for rigging electronic voting machines

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile"

Answer the questions

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

don't worry...... sickie is doing the "bait and switch fox news" thingey... where he is trying to get you to look at the shiney thing "clinton and the DNC" to deflect from trump, russia manafort and papadopolous!

as for the clintons and the DNC... i am not surprised, Clinton had the Super Delegates in her back pocket and we now know why to such a degree with here essentially bankrolling the DNC!

it also shows the DNC have to do a better job of fundraising and not just in presidential elections.... and in a sense the "bernie" campaign was a godsend because he has shown you can do that! and I think it is right that he doesn't give them his list since wasserman-schultz wasn't a neutral person in all this!

at the moment the party is split into a establishment wing and a bernie wing... (actually the pubs are not doing much better in that regard!) I don't think Tom Perez and keith ellison are doing a bad job so far.... but some mechanisms have to go!

the super delegate system has to go.... if 500 people have 25% of the power, it has to go!

the top brass has to be freshened up.... i think pelosi should stand down in the house, but she is going to hold onto with her fingertips....

the talent is out there..... it will be interesting just who does decide to run in 2020..... i'm still hoping it will be elizabeth warren but we shall see....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"don't worry...... sickie is doing the "bait and switch fox news" thingey... where he is trying to get you to look at the shiney thing "clinton and the DNC" to deflect from trump, russia manafort and papadopolous!

as for the clintons and the DNC... i am not surprised, Clinton had the Super Delegates in her back pocket and we now know why to such a degree with here essentially bankrolling the DNC!

the super delegate system has to go.... if 500 people have 25% of the power, it has to go!

the top brass has to be freshened up.... i think pelosi should stand down in the house, but she is going to hold onto with her fingertips....

the talent is out there..... it will be interesting just who does decide to run in 2020..... i'm still hoping it will be elizabeth warren but we shall see....

So you dont think that "voting booths" are the reason Bernie lost to Hilary?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Answer the questions"
.

Your very demanding!

Watch "How Bernie Sanders Really Won the 2016 Democratic Primary" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/CF4TefCmc9I.

This was made before we now know that Hillary Clinton's campaign was effectively running the DNC a year before the primaries started, ngp van. Remember that name I think with any luck they'll be some fucking good arrests from an FBI investigation into it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

as for the clintons and the DNC... i am not surprised, Clinton had the Super Delegates in her back pocket and we now know why to such a degree with here essentially bankrolling the DNC!

the super delegate system has to go.... if 500 people have 25% of the power, it has to go!

the top brass has to be freshened up.... i think pelosi should stand down in the house, but she is going to hold onto with her fingertips....

the talent is out there..... it will be interesting just who does decide to run in 2020..... i'm still hoping it will be elizabeth warren but we shall see....

"
.

Yes that classic case of look over there at trump, who has no evidence against him at all while over here the democratic party has evidence of actual election rigging and collision with Russia... Don't look here, look over there at trump.

Don't look at the 145 million funneled through the Clinton Foundation from several individuals from rosatom, don't look at the guys who kept the FBI findings of kick backs and bribery from rosatom quiet who was Mueller, no don't look, look over there at trump and Russia and hacking.... You know 17 agencies told you they were hacked didn't they, you told me that months ago, stop being a conspiracy theorist 17 agencies? Err no, it's just 2 and those 2 have hand picked establishment floozies to give you the narrative.... Don't look at the only piece of actual evidence done which was by the NSA which said "it was not feasible that any hack could have downloaded at the speeds that they were downloaded at, the only way they could be downloaded at the speeds they were was by somebody using a flash drive there in person"(by the way were these were the same 17 agencies that absolutely knew it was Assad dropping sarin on his own people???).

Anyhow yes don't look over here at the dozens of voting abnormalities, the money laundering (not my words but Donna braziles) the fraud, the conspiracy, don't look over here at hilarious Hillary's emails saying yeah obviously I have to tell my voter's one thing while doing another or they wouldn't vote for me

and obviously my emails of daughter and son-in-law using Clinton Foundation money for their own use and weddings, no don't look here, look at trumps son in law.

And frankly all you thousands of volunteers who worked hundreds of hours missed out on important stuff because you wanted a Bernie win... Well you can fuck off, because we had it rigged all along (again not my words but the words of Donna brazile and Elisabeth Warren).

Yes what the DNC need is freshening up at the top, that will sure solve stuff

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I mean what happened to that rule of law shit you've been banging on about CLCC?.

I say let's try that for a change, let's have a bipartisan investigation and let's send the people at the top of the DNC to prison where the corporate fucking shills belong.

Then maybe we can start a fresh with some honest politics for a change.... It might even work out better for ALL of us for a change instead of just the corporation's and the billionaires

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Open your eyes you bunch of fucking sheeple.

I mean who wants that Pro climate change fanatic Al gore in charge when your really interested in invading the middle East.. Shush it's ok I know this guy Chad who can see to that

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Be a Catholic for the day.... It's a good day for it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I mean what happened to that rule of law shit you've been banging on about CLCC?.

I say let's try that for a change, let's have a bipartisan investigation and let's send the people at the top of the DNC to prison where the corporate fucking shills belong.

Then maybe we can start a fresh with some honest politics for a change.... It might even work out better for ALL of us for a change instead of just the corporation's and the billionaires

"
.

Come on, I used the word "change" loads there, it worked out really well for Obama's campaign even if he didn't err do any change

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes

"Last year I was a conspiracy theorist for suggesting that the DNC was completely corrupt and colluding to give you a candidate that the money wanted you to have!!.

IMHO you still are

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes

"Except that the NEC has been completely taken over by momentum Marxists.....other than that you’re pretty close!

You see that's just the sort of thing I expect to hear from someone totally indoctrinated by the ultra right.

I think you'll find there's quite a few people who don't live in Germany who also don't like the sound of all that control being put into the hands of the government and state. But I guess you can always send us all off for 're-education' somewhere in the country side until we're 'less greedy and more ready' to have everything in our lives run for and controlled by the state.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I can't tell if whining about super delegates was the dumbest part of this, or the earnest use of the phrase "sheeple".

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Last year I was a conspiracy theorist for suggesting that the DNC was completely corrupt and colluding to give you a candidate that the money wanted you to have!!.

IMHO you still are

"
.

I have to keep on the move alot or "they'll" track me down

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I can't tell if whining about super delegates was the dumbest part of this, or the earnest use of the phrase "sheeple"."
.

Soz sheeple but I didn't whine about super delagates that was Fabio

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Answer the questions.

Your very demanding!

Watch "How Bernie Sanders Really Won the 2016 Democratic Primary" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/CF4TefCmc9I.

How did the presence of a voting booth, a standard piece of equipment used in probably every election in the world, mean that people voted for Clinton instead of Sanders?

How were there queues only for Sanders supporters and not Clinton supporters?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"I mean what happened to that rule of law shit you've been banging on about CLCC?.

I say let's try that for a change, let's have a bipartisan investigation and let's send the people at the top of the DNC to prison where the corporate fucking shills belong.

Then maybe we can start a fresh with some honest politics for a change.... It might even work out better for ALL of us for a change instead of just the corporation's and the billionaires

There is nothing stopping the FBI investigating.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Answer the questions.

Your very demanding!

Watch "How Bernie Sanders Really Won the 2016 Democratic Primary" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/CF4TefCmc9I.

How did the presence of a voting booth, a standard piece of equipment used in probably every election in the world, mean that people voted for Clinton instead of Sanders?

How were there queues only for Sanders supporters and not Clinton supporters?"
.

Stop being a corporatist shill and read the writing on the wall.

They cut back on the voting stations meaning densely packed poor areas more likely to vote Bernie had five and eight hour queues to vote whereas wealthier corporate shill places to live (like Cambridge) where the density is far far less just walked in and voted?.

Now let's talk about the massive difference in exit polling that only showed up for Clinton in boroughs where they used electronic voting machines owned and ran by NGPvan who was a heavy donator of Clinton's and ran by a former Clinton staffer?...hmmm yeah that'll be the Russians again hey?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Answer the questions.

Your very demanding!

Watch "How Bernie Sanders Really Won the 2016 Democratic Primary" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/CF4TefCmc9I.

How did the presence of a voting booth, a standard piece of equipment used in probably every election in the world, mean that people voted for Clinton instead of Sanders?

How were there queues only for Sanders supporters and not Clinton supporters?.

Stop being a corporatist shill and read the writing on the wall.

Sorry to disappoint, but there wasn't a single polling station in the whole of Cambridgeshire for the democratic primary.

How many voting stations were closed in the 2016 democratic primary compared to the previous democratic primary?

You still haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Answer the questions.

Your very demanding!

Watch "How Bernie Sanders Really Won the 2016 Democratic Primary" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/CF4TefCmc9I.

How did the presence of a voting booth, a standard piece of equipment used in probably every election in the world, mean that people voted for Clinton instead of Sanders?

How were there queues only for Sanders supporters and not Clinton supporters?.

Stop being a corporatist shill and read the writing on the wall.

Sorry to disappoint, but there wasn't a single polling station in the whole of Cambridgeshire for the democratic primary.

How many voting stations were closed in the 2016 democratic primary compared to the previous democratic primary?

You still haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton."
.

Which bit didn't you get?

Serious question as I was writing as if you were at least half intelligent, if your telling me your really stupid I'll try to write it in simpler form?.(ps the Cambridge bit was sarcasm

Now I'll go very slow.

Poor areas likely to vote Bernie 3 voting stations 700,000 residents 8 hour queues.

Wealthy areas, likely to vote Clinton 3 polling stations 50,000 residents, walk right in and vote.... Therefore hardly any Clinton voters were "put off" by 8 hour queues whereas poor people were coz they couldn't queue for 8 hours coz they had a fucking life and kids and shit

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Watch this or remain a sheeple all your life, choice is yours!.

Watch "[97] Election Fraud Special Report! (You Won't Believe This)" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/TmYYvZASoks.

This is why they want to shut RT down, coz they don't want the sheeple waking up

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Answer the questions.

Your very demanding!

Watch "How Bernie Sanders Really Won the 2016 Democratic Primary" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/CF4TefCmc9I.

How did the presence of a voting booth, a standard piece of equipment used in probably every election in the world, mean that people voted for Clinton instead of Sanders?

How were there queues only for Sanders supporters and not Clinton supporters?.

Stop being a corporatist shill and read the writing on the wall.

Sorry to disappoint, but there wasn't a single polling station in the whole of Cambridgeshire for the democratic primary.

How many voting stations were closed in the 2016 democratic primary compared to the previous democratic primary?

You still haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton..

Which bit didn't you get?

Serious question as I was writing as if you were at least half intelligent, if your telling me your really stupid I'll try to write it in simpler form?.(ps the Cambridge bit was sarcasm

Now I'll go very slow.

Poor areas likely to vote Bernie 3 voting stations 700,000 residents 8 hour queues.

Firstly, you are making assumptions about who would vote for Clinton and who would vote for Sanders, without providing any evidence that that is the case.

Secondly, who decided where the polling stations were?

Thirdly, number of residents doesn't matter in closed states, like NY which you mentioned earlier, only the number of registered democrats.

Fourthly, you STILL haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Answer the questions.

Your very demanding!

Watch "How Bernie Sanders Really Won the 2016 Democratic Primary" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/CF4TefCmc9I.

How did the presence of a voting booth, a standard piece of equipment used in probably every election in the world, mean that people voted for Clinton instead of Sanders?

How were there queues only for Sanders supporters and not Clinton supporters?.

Stop being a corporatist shill and read the writing on the wall.

Sorry to disappoint, but there wasn't a single polling station in the whole of Cambridgeshire for the democratic primary.

How many voting stations were closed in the 2016 democratic primary compared to the previous democratic primary?

You still haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton..

Which bit didn't you get?

Serious question as I was writing as if you were at least half intelligent, if your telling me your really stupid I'll try to write it in simpler form?.(ps the Cambridge bit was sarcasm

Now I'll go very slow.

Poor areas likely to vote Bernie 3 voting stations 700,000 residents 8 hour queues.

Firstly, you are making assumptions about who would vote for Clinton and who would vote for Sanders, without providing any evidence that that is the case.

Secondly, who decided where the polling stations were?

Thirdly, number of residents doesn't matter in closed states, like NY which you mentioned earlier, only the number of registered democrats.

Fourthly, you STILL haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton. "
.

Oh lordy, she was in charge of the DNC which had all the fucking voter data she had all the records of who'd donated to Sanders.

This isn't just a Bernie scam, it's a scam against the voting poor, trump and killary are opposite side of the same coin, they were both colluding with the Russians both taking kick backs both taking bribes, Bush Obama Clinton Bush trump putin.... They are the deep state for Christ sake that's why the billionaires fund them all, it's an oligopoly of robber barons, that's why US foreign policy doesn't ever change no matter whos in, that's why we sold off the NHS and invaded Iraq under labour.

You can't solve the problem till your ACTUALLY aware of the problem and you clearly are still and will always remain a corporatist shill sheeple.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Answer the questions.

Your very demanding!

Watch "How Bernie Sanders Really Won the 2016 Democratic Primary" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/CF4TefCmc9I.

How did the presence of a voting booth, a standard piece of equipment used in probably every election in the world, mean that people voted for Clinton instead of Sanders?

How were there queues only for Sanders supporters and not Clinton supporters?.

Stop being a corporatist shill and read the writing on the wall.

Sorry to disappoint, but there wasn't a single polling station in the whole of Cambridgeshire for the democratic primary.

How many voting stations were closed in the 2016 democratic primary compared to the previous democratic primary?

You still haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton..

Which bit didn't you get?

Serious question as I was writing as if you were at least half intelligent, if your telling me your really stupid I'll try to write it in simpler form?.(ps the Cambridge bit was sarcasm

Now I'll go very slow.

Poor areas likely to vote Bernie 3 voting stations 700,000 residents 8 hour queues.

Firstly, you are making assumptions about who would vote for Clinton and who would vote for Sanders, without providing any evidence that that is the case.

Secondly, who decided where the polling stations were?

Thirdly, number of residents doesn't matter in closed states, like NY which you mentioned earlier, only the number of registered democrats.

Fourthly, you STILL haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton. .

Oh lordy, she was in charge of the DNC which had all the fucking voter data she had all the records of who'd donated to Sanders.

You can't solve the problem till your ACTUALLY aware of the problem and you clearly are still and will always remain a corporatist shill sheeple.

Troll, you haven't answered any of the questions.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Answer the questions.

Your very demanding!

Watch "How Bernie Sanders Really Won the 2016 Democratic Primary" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/CF4TefCmc9I.

How did the presence of a voting booth, a standard piece of equipment used in probably every election in the world, mean that people voted for Clinton instead of Sanders?

How were there queues only for Sanders supporters and not Clinton supporters?.

Stop being a corporatist shill and read the writing on the wall.

Sorry to disappoint, but there wasn't a single polling station in the whole of Cambridgeshire for the democratic primary.

How many voting stations were closed in the 2016 democratic primary compared to the previous democratic primary?

You still haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton..

Which bit didn't you get?

Serious question as I was writing as if you were at least half intelligent, if your telling me your really stupid I'll try to write it in simpler form?.(ps the Cambridge bit was sarcasm

Now I'll go very slow.

Poor areas likely to vote Bernie 3 voting stations 700,000 residents 8 hour queues.

Firstly, you are making assumptions about who would vote for Clinton and who would vote for Sanders, without providing any evidence that that is the case.

Secondly, who decided where the polling stations were?

Thirdly, number of residents doesn't matter in closed states, like NY which you mentioned earlier, only the number of registered democrats.

Fourthly, you STILL haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton. .

Oh lordy, she was in charge of the DNC which had all the fucking voter data she had all the records of who'd donated to Sanders.

You can't solve the problem till your ACTUALLY aware of the problem and you clearly are still and will always remain a corporatist shill sheeple.

Troll, you haven't answered any of the questions. "
.

What questions? You just post nonsense that's not about anything I post, you then pick on one point that suits you and even when I explain it in a very simple way just for you, you just do your normal trick of saying.. Answer the question?.

Your a corporatist sheeple, just be happy in your corporate little world with your corporate ideology,I noticed you like to post stuff like stupid poor people shouldn't be listened to in the brexit referendum?? Yeah that doesn't surprise me that you support the system that keeps them that way, your the neo liberal type who frankly we have to thank for trump or brexit because the rest of the sheeple have woke up a bit and they ain't buying your bullshit anymore.

Pandora ain't getting back in that box no matter how much of a paddy you throw

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I can't tell if whining about super delegates was the dumbest part of this, or the earnest use of the phrase "sheeple"..

Soz sheeple but I didn't whine about super delagates that was Fabio

Really now? Because if we scroll up just a bit we see this gem from yourself.

"And that's before we even mention superdelegates,400 of which voted for Hillary before they even knew who the candidate were, let alone their policies.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"Vote rigging, long lines, voter booths, freezing Sanders party out of dnc voter information..

The USA uses a 2% difference between exit polls and the actual result for concern for fraud!!

Hillary Clinton saw a 12% difference in 20 New York boroughs, any investigation, nah.

Voter suppression they excuse the republicans of, not a Dicky bird said about Hillary's

Let's look at two of those. Long lines, and voter booths.

How do long lines to vote sway a primary towards one Democrat candidate and away from another?

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for Hilary rather than Bernie? Isn't a voter booth a fairly standard piece of equipment in an election? .

Well Bernie's voters had to queue for up to 8 hours whereas Hillary's didn't, they're fore

People who had stuff to do like err living didn't get to vote for the candidate they wanted

You also haven't explained how voting booths contributed to Clinton getting more votes than Sanders..

Did you watch any of the US election?... It was a talking point for awhile

Answer the questions.

Your very demanding!

Watch "How Bernie Sanders Really Won the 2016 Democratic Primary" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/CF4TefCmc9I.

How did the presence of a voting booth, a standard piece of equipment used in probably every election in the world, mean that people voted for Clinton instead of Sanders?

How were there queues only for Sanders supporters and not Clinton supporters?.

Stop being a corporatist shill and read the writing on the wall.

Sorry to disappoint, but there wasn't a single polling station in the whole of Cambridgeshire for the democratic primary.

How many voting stations were closed in the 2016 democratic primary compared to the previous democratic primary?

You still haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton..

Which bit didn't you get?

Serious question as I was writing as if you were at least half intelligent, if your telling me your really stupid I'll try to write it in simpler form?.(ps the Cambridge bit was sarcasm

Now I'll go very slow.

Poor areas likely to vote Bernie 3 voting stations 700,000 residents 8 hour queues.

Firstly, you are making assumptions about who would vote for Clinton and who would vote for Sanders, without providing any evidence that that is the case.

Secondly, who decided where the polling stations were?

Thirdly, number of residents doesn't matter in closed states, like NY which you mentioned earlier, only the number of registered democrats.

Fourthly, you STILL haven't explained how a voting booth helped Clinton. .

Oh lordy, she was in charge of the DNC which had all the fucking voter data she had all the records of who'd donated to Sanders.

You can't solve the problem till your ACTUALLY aware of the problem and you clearly are still and will always remain a corporatist shill sheeple.

Troll, you haven't answered any of the questions. .

Pandora ain't getting back in that box no matter how much of a paddy you throw

What questions????

Let's reduce it down to one.

How does a voter booth make people more likely to vote for clinton?

You listed "voter booths" as a reason why clinton won over Sanders, so please explain that one to us.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

The people who post in the politics forum obviously would rather cling to there political ideologies than spend 10 minutes doing some research.

I'm amazed that people would rather be uninformed or miss informed than finding out what is going on in the word.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"The people who post in the politics forum obviously would rather cling to there political ideologies than spend 10 minutes doing some research.

I'm amazed that people would rather be uninformed or miss informed than finding out what is going on in the word."
.

Fear is a very real emotion and humans are very fearful creatures by nurture.

These sheeple aren't any different, there afraid to hear that the world in which they've learned, grown up in and live in isn't what it seems, worse still there seems no easy solution for it all and so like the proverbial ostrich stick their heads firmly up their arses.

Civilisation as we know it, is a cult and like all occultists some break free and some just refuse out of fear

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yes, the mantra of "Be a free thinker.... This means agreeing with all my ideas, btw!" doesn't really have the appeal that it's users would hope.

Fantastic way to put yourself on the "not worth listening to" list, though. Very efficient.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anybody that's interested in awakening please listen to people who ACTUALLY know something rather than these two egg heads.

Watch "Jimmy Dore On Being Smeared By The War Mongering Media [67]" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/XuLETr_uL0A

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

Brazile: I found no evidence Dem primary was rigged

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/05/politics/donna-brazile-primary-rigged/index.html

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes

"Anybody that's interested in awakening please listen to people who ACTUALLY know something rather than these two egg heads.

Watch "Jimmy Dore On Being Smeared By The War Mongering Media [67]" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/XuLETr_uL0A"

There's a video on YouTube that says there's a conspiracy hiding the fact that the Queen and Prince Philip are actually alien lizard people. Should I believe that to?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

"Anybody that's interested in awakening please listen to people who ACTUALLY know something rather than these two egg heads.

Watch "Jimmy Dore On Being Smeared By The War Mongering Media [67]" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/XuLETr_uL0A

There's a video on YouTube that says there's a conspiracy hiding the fact that the Queen and Prince Philip are actually alien lizard people. Should I believe that to?"

If it's on youtube, it must be true.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Anybody that's interested in awakening please listen to people who ACTUALLY know something rather than these two egg heads.

Watch "Jimmy Dore On Being Smeared By The War Mongering Media [67]" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/XuLETr_uL0A

There's a video on YouTube that says there's a conspiracy hiding the fact that the Queen and Prince Philip are actually alien lizard people. Should I believe that to?

If it's on youtube, it must be true."
.

The boat masters used to tell African slaves the same shit you do.... In the new world it will be all cushy, there's food galore and plenty of good living...don't fret it, just be a good little slave and don't cause no trouble on the boat ride over!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Coz I'm a making some dollar of the current system and I'm sure as hell gonna fight to keep it

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread