Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corbyn may be at the helm of labour, John Mcdonnel is potentially the man stoking the engines should labour succeed.. What a chequered past he has had.. Kicked out of the GLC by red Ken for refusing to curb his spending, the man that wants Mi5 and armed police removed, the man that praised the IRA and the man that is more of a Marxist than Karl marx himself... Well I do hope I'm not unfurling a hammer and sickle come Friday morning..." Very scary to think McDonnel could be chancellor of the exchequer if Labour win. This is the man who threw chairman Mao's little red book at George Osborne over the despatch box in the House of Commons, and when asked by a journalist what he would do if he could go back in time he replied..."I'd go back and assassinate Margaret Thatcher. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corbyn PM McDonnell Chancellor Abbot Home Secretary Thornberry Foreign Secretary The Dream Team......" Yes indeed that will be the ticket to get the Conservative Party to wake up and ditch the worst PM since Ted Heath. Let the Lsbour stalwarts do their worst and then hopefully by 2022 the country will have recovered its collective sense and we can get back to middle of the road politics  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corbyn PM McDonnell Chancellor Abbot Home Secretary Thornberry Foreign Secretary The Dream Team......" That dream would be a Nightmare. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corbyn may be at the helm of labour, John Mcdonnel is potentially the man stoking the engines should labour succeed.. What a chequered past he has had.. Kicked out of the GLC by red Ken for refusing to curb his spending, the man that wants Mi5 and armed police removed, the man that praised the IRA and the man that is more of a Marxist than Karl marx himself... Well I do hope I'm not unfurling a hammer and sickle come Friday morning..." When he was responsible for making or processing the rent payments at one small London Radio station he failed to process them and the bailiffs actually changed the locks . The thought of having a terrorist sympathiser who was too incompetent for even Ken Livingstone as Chancellor is too horrendous to even think about. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. " Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. " So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corbyn PM McDonnell Chancellor Abbot Home Secretary Thornberry Foreign Secretary The Dream Team...... Yes indeed that will be the ticket to get the Conservative Party to wake up and ditch the worst PM since Ted Heath. Let the Lsbour stalwarts do their worst and then hopefully by 2022 the country will have recovered its collective sense and we can get back to middle of the road politics "Put Corbyn and McDonnel in charge for 5 years and there wont be enough money left to pay for the ballot papers. Either that or they will go back to their Stalinist roots and abolish elections. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . " LOL. I know a couple of bars in Benidorm who are looking for a good comedian. Fancy it?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corbyn PM McDonnell Chancellor Abbot Home Secretary Thornberry Foreign Secretary The Dream Team...... Yes indeed that will be the ticket to get the Conservative Party to wake up and ditch the worst PM since Ted Heath. Let the Lsbour stalwarts do their worst and then hopefully by 2022 the country will have recovered its collective sense and we can get back to middle of the road politics
Put Corbyn and McDonnel in charge for 5 years and there wont be enough money left to pay for the ballot papers.
Either that or they will go back to their Stalinist roots and abolish elections."This is a nightmare scenario. Any responsible person would see their savings and investments devasted . Jerememy Corbyns education is two A levels ( both at Grade E ) . Mc Donnel is a terrorist sympathiser and economically illiterate. If the electorate were foolish enough to elect this pair, I cannot see them lasting more than a year . Once the impact of their policies sunk in there would be outrage. I have no desire to see my plans for a healthy income when retired to be destroyed by a Labour Government . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Surprised no one has mentioned pol pot and wear zero yet.. 
Doesn't read like confidence in the great strong and stable one at all..
Btw.. Dianne Abbott, can't abide the woman too.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corbyn PM McDonnell Chancellor Abbot Home Secretary Thornberry Foreign Secretary The Dream Team......" More like The crazy gang... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . " Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. " Every time you see a terrorist on the TV they are always carrying AK47's which is Russian made. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. " No smoke without fire. Keep sailing up that river in egypt.The saudis are complicit and may turns a blind eye because theres billions to be made. If she's innocent realease the files.She doesn't have a great history with files though does she.Remember while Home Secretary she lost 114 documents of historical allegations of pedophiles in the house of commons.Convienent. . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. No smoke without fire. Keep sailing up that river in egypt.The saudis are complicit and may turns a blind eye because theres billions to be made. If she's innocent realease the files.She doesn't have a great history with files though does she.Remember while Home Secretary she lost 114 documents of historical allegations of pedophiles in the house of commons.Convienent. . "Utter bullshit. Al Queda and ISIS repeatedly try to assasinate the saudi royal family, why would that happen if they are funding them? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. " Not true. He takes half of keynes (spend in recession) and ignores the othet half (run a surplus when not in recession). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. No smoke without fire. Keep sailing up that river in egypt.The saudis are complicit and may turns a blind eye because theres billions to be made. If she's innocent realease the files.She doesn't have a great history with files though does she.Remember while Home Secretary she lost 114 documents of historical allegations of pedophiles in the house of commons.Convienent. .
Utter bullshit. Al Queda and ISIS repeatedly try to assasinate the saudi royal family, why would that happen if they are funding them? "My enemies enemy is my friend. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. No smoke without fire. Keep sailing up that river in egypt.The saudis are complicit and may turns a blind eye because theres billions to be made. If she's innocent realease the files.She doesn't have a great history with files though does she.Remember while Home Secretary she lost 114 documents of historical allegations of pedophiles in the house of commons.Convienent. .
Utter bullshit. Al Queda and ISIS repeatedly try to assasinate the saudi royal family, why would that happen if they are funding them? My enemies enemy is my friend. "Turkeys don't fund thanksgiving. You're confusing money that comes from saudi arabia (a largely anti-western population) with the pro western government that we sell weapons too. You should really know better. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. No smoke without fire. Keep sailing up that river in egypt.The saudis are complicit and may turns a blind eye because theres billions to be made. If she's innocent realease the files.She doesn't have a great history with files though does she.Remember while Home Secretary she lost 114 documents of historical allegations of pedophiles in the house of commons.Convienent. .
Utter bullshit. Al Queda and ISIS repeatedly try to assasinate the saudi royal family, why would that happen if they are funding them? My enemies enemy is my friend.
Turkeys don't fund thanksgiving. You're confusing money that comes from saudi arabia (a largely anti-western population) with the pro western government that we sell weapons too. You should really know better. "You should familiarise your self with the concept of non linear war. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. No smoke without fire. Keep sailing up that river in egypt.The saudis are complicit and may turns a blind eye because theres billions to be made. If she's innocent realease the files.She doesn't have a great history with files though does she.Remember while Home Secretary she lost 114 documents of historical allegations of pedophiles in the house of commons.Convienent. .
Utter bullshit. Al Queda and ISIS repeatedly try to assasinate the saudi royal family, why would that happen if they are funding them? My enemies enemy is my friend.
Turkeys don't fund thanksgiving. You're confusing money that comes from saudi arabia (a largely anti-western population) with the pro western government that we sell weapons too. You should really know better. "Osama bin Laden was a Saudi national but he disowned his country when Saudi Arabia allowed the USA to use Saudi airbases to launch attacks against Iraq during the first Gulf war in the early 1990's. Bin Laden hated Saudi Arabia. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. No smoke without fire. Keep sailing up that river in egypt.The saudis are complicit and may turns a blind eye because theres billions to be made. If she's innocent realease the files.She doesn't have a great history with files though does she.Remember while Home Secretary she lost 114 documents of historical allegations of pedophiles in the house of commons.Convienent. .
Utter bullshit. Al Queda and ISIS repeatedly try to assasinate the saudi royal family, why would that happen if they are funding them? My enemies enemy is my friend.
Turkeys don't fund thanksgiving. You're confusing money that comes from saudi arabia (a largely anti-western population) with the pro western government that we sell weapons too. You should really know better.
Osama bin Laden was a Saudi national but he disowned his country when Saudi Arabia allowed the USA to use Saudi airbases to launch attacks against Iraq during the first Gulf war in the early 1990's. Bin Laden hated Saudi Arabia. "And who funded his mujahdeen. .. Bin Laden left Saudi Arabia in 1979 to fight against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The Afghan jihad was backed with American dollars and had the blessing of the governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. He received security training from the CIA itself. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. No smoke without fire. Keep sailing up that river in egypt.The saudis are complicit and may turns a blind eye because theres billions to be made. If she's innocent realease the files.She doesn't have a great history with files though does she.Remember while Home Secretary she lost 114 documents of historical allegations of pedophiles in the house of commons.Convienent. .
Utter bullshit. Al Queda and ISIS repeatedly try to assasinate the saudi royal family, why would that happen if they are funding them? My enemies enemy is my friend.
Turkeys don't fund thanksgiving. You're confusing money that comes from saudi arabia (a largely anti-western population) with the pro western government that we sell weapons too. You should really know better.
Osama bin Laden was a Saudi national but he disowned his country when Saudi Arabia allowed the USA to use Saudi airbases to launch attacks against Iraq during the first Gulf war in the early 1990's. Bin Laden hated Saudi Arabia. And who funded his mujahdeen. ..
Bin Laden left Saudi Arabia in 1979 to fight against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The Afghan jihad was backed with American dollars and had the blessing of the governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. He received security training from the CIA itself."The Us supplied the Mujahdeen with weapons, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand why with all the cold war posturing. However, how does john mcdonnell fit into this? Was he fighting alongside the Russians by chance? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"John Mac is a back street bare nuckle boxer of a politician. Just the man to put the Blairites back in thier box. Labour economic plan is based on Kaynsianism not Marxism. Keynes was actually a Liberal and not a marxist. Keynes economic plan got us out of the great dipression recovered our econemy after the 2nd world war and a form of it (quantative easing) stopped the world sliding into a second great dipression in 2010. Is John Mac a nice guy? No he is a little shit but he is the little shit we need right now. Unlikely you recall of ever had any interest in the GlC, What a mess he made of that. Ideologies that worked post war aren't likely to work in this day and age.. The world has definitely changed and moved on.. He admitted he is a Marxist, he was happy to give a talk whilst standing in front of a communist flag.. But worst of all, he supported terrorism with his words.. So this is the man you want creating a hand out society where the have not (have not got a job that is) are better off than those that work a 37 hour week? Where murderers returning from Syria will be welcomed with open arms? Because, that is what he stands for.. So theresea selling arms to saudi arabia who then supplies training and funding for Isis isn't supporting terrorism ? Why this week is she refusing to release a government report that links saudi to isis and terrorism here. If theres nothing to hide why suppress it.Farron and Corbyn have called fot its release.Silence from May the terrorist sympathizer . Please ensure when making statements such as above, you hold actual evidence to back your statement and you are not just reciting d*unken tittle tattle you heard down the pub. Facts- British defence companies supply arms to Saudi, they are one of the many purchaser's of British manufactured weapons systems around the world. Britain also supplies the after service for those arms; training, through life surveillance, life extension, disposal of life expired ammunition and asset management. As such, the British account for the majority or weapons the Saudis hold, so if they were to sell them on, which they don't, the British would be aware of the missing assets. All arms are accounted for as most fall under the rules of Itar or EAR and as such have to be accounted for and mustered regularly. Any funding for arms doesn't come from the Saudi government but may come from wealthy investors that live in Saudi, as well as those that may live in many other oil rich states. This funding is usually due to religious alignment or a desire for the creation shariah state. Weapons used by insurgents tend to be of Russian, Pakistani or Iranian origin. The occasional NATO issue weapon may be seen in use, that which has been captured off of Iraqi forces, however I'm sure that cannot be classed as "being supplied by Britain", nor can the museum piece field gun of British decent which was recently found when Is were defeated in an area of iraq. Of all the weapons captured back from Is, 98% are of soviet production. The report to which you refer has been delayed in its issue, not due to any information condemning a British political body but due to the sensative nature of the findings.. It is only speculation where any links lie, again d*unken pub tittle tattle, but whatever it contains, and here's a hypothetical question, would you give up your knowledge of who is funding terrorism to the public domain.. That's pretty much pre warning them "we will be coming for you!" come on, get real. Every time you see a terrorist on the TV they are always carrying AK47's which is Russian made. " Actually the vast majority of these are Chinese and Norh Korean Knock offs. There cheaper. The AK47 was designed in the 2nd World War by a Russian enginer using a German Paratroop weapon as a template. Mass production of this very reliable gun was undertaken in every communist country on the planet. Some are as old as 60 years and still function perfectly due to the simplicity of design. Even the Amaricans prefered it to the M16 in Vietnam as it is so simple it did not jam up as often and simpler to clear a jam when it did. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corbyn PM McDonnell Chancellor Abbot Home Secretary Thornberry Foreign Secretary The Dream Team...... Yes indeed that will be the ticket to get the Conservative Party to wake up and ditch the worst PM since Ted Heath. Let the Lsbour stalwarts do their worst and then hopefully by 2022 the country will have recovered its collective sense and we can get back to middle of the road politics
Put Corbyn and McDonnel in charge for 5 years and there wont be enough money left to pay for the ballot papers.
Either that or they will go back to their Stalinist roots and abolish elections. This is a nightmare scenario. Any responsible person would see their savings and investments devasted . Jerememy Corbyns education is two A levels ( both at Grade E ) . Mc Donnel is a terrorist sympathiser and economically illiterate.
If the electorate were foolish enough to elect this pair, I cannot see them lasting more than a year . Once the impact of their policies sunk in there would be outrage.
I have no desire to see my plans for a healthy income when retired to be destroyed by a Labour Government .
"And John Major's maths was so lousy he couldn't even pass the test as a bus conductor and someone else got the job! And Osborne's only job was folding towels.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corbyn PM McDonnell Chancellor Abbot Home Secretary Thornberry Foreign Secretary The Dream Team...... Yes indeed that will be the ticket to get the Conservative Party to wake up and ditch the worst PM since Ted Heath. Let the Lsbour stalwarts do their worst and then hopefully by 2022 the country will have recovered its collective sense and we can get back to middle of the road politics
Put Corbyn and McDonnel in charge for 5 years and there wont be enough money left to pay for the ballot papers.
Either that or they will go back to their Stalinist roots and abolish elections. This is a nightmare scenario. Any responsible person would see their savings and investments devasted . Jerememy Corbyns education is two A levels ( both at Grade E ) . Mc Donnel is a terrorist sympathiser and economically illiterate.
If the electorate were foolish enough to elect this pair, I cannot see them lasting more than a year . Once the impact of their policies sunk in there would be outrage.
I have no desire to see my plans for a healthy income when retired to be destroyed by a Labour Government .
And John Major's maths was so lousy he couldn't even pass the test as a bus conductor and someone else got the job!
And Osborne's only job was folding towels....
"And those towels were not fluffy! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Corbyn PM McDonnell Chancellor Abbot Home Secretary Thornberry Foreign Secretary The Dream Team...... Yes indeed that will be the ticket to get the Conservative Party to wake up and ditch the worst PM since Ted Heath. Let the Lsbour stalwarts do their worst and then hopefully by 2022 the country will have recovered its collective sense and we can get back to middle of the road politics
Put Corbyn and McDonnel in charge for 5 years and there wont be enough money left to pay for the ballot papers.
Either that or they will go back to their Stalinist roots and abolish elections. This is a nightmare scenario. Any responsible person would see their savings and investments devasted . Jerememy Corbyns education is two A levels ( both at Grade E ) . Mc Donnel is a terrorist sympathiser and economically illiterate.
If the electorate were foolish enough to elect this pair, I cannot see them lasting more than a year . Once the impact of their policies sunk in there would be outrage.
I have no desire to see my plans for a healthy income when retired to be destroyed by a Labour Government .
And John Major's maths was so lousy he couldn't even pass the test as a bus conductor and someone else got the job!
And Osborne's only job was folding towels....
And those towels were not fluffy!"Titter… No they were not!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
