FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Reporting hate crimes

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Just wanted to make sure you are all aware before anything gets out of hand. If you see it report it.

http://report-it.org.uk/what_is_hate_crime

I am sure we are all responsible adults who takes their duty as good citizens to report any and all forms of hate speech.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

Beyond ridiculous.

A hate crime is just a regular crime where some pretends to know the motivation. The motivation, even if you could know it is irrelevant.

A hate incident isn't a crime and therefore there's nothing the police can do. A waste of time and resources.

Two pointless categories created for the sake of the central message: 'report crimes to the police'.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I beg to differ, actually the police can do quite alot, there have been numerous prosecutions on that basis.

I think the police do a stellar job in general under quite tough circumstances. I wish there were more also, and I hope many people here do also.

I support them, does anyone else?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I beg to differ, actually the police can do quite alot, there have been numerous prosecutions on that basis.

I think the police do a stellar job in general under quite tough circumstances. I wish there were more also, and I hope many people here do also.

I support them, does anyone else?

"

I agree with the police but the current criteria for what counts as a hate crime is non existent. You just report it and they have to log it. It's so the government can use the stats.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wingtolifeCouple
over a year ago

who knows

if only the media were called on it first, they are the most guilty. it seems they are peoples only voice

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obka3Couple
over a year ago

bournemouth

while violence against anyone is wrong I really think some people need to grow a pair.

Perhaps we should go back through the threads on this site and report all those tolerant people who called brexit voters, old thick racists, add in those called fucktards, fuckwits etc etc, seems to me those who call things hate crimes are the worst at chucking insults about

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

With brexit, hate crime have risen.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Don't we all hate crime? I certainly know I don't like it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My sister works alongside a black fellow who is very incompetent, he's caused numerous workplace accidents, has no real interest or investment in doing his job effectively.. just essentially keeping up appearances by clocking in , clocking out and coasting along picking up pay cheques- forcing others to shoulder the burdens of his work load.

The company won't dismiss him for fear of accusations of racism , he knows this and plays on it .

I have to agree with one of the posters above, assault and harassment are already crimes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

Reported hate crimes in Manchester have doubled since last Monday according to GMP

Guess there is an action reaction element in hate crimes, but then I would say there is also an element of if you are a member of a visible minority then you will attract more scrutiny than if you do not stick out from the crowd and any negative action by a part of a minority will be more noticed than the same action by a member of the majority.

Human psychology seems to hard-wire us to spot the odd ones out and focus our attention on them. I guess tribal savagery is not too far beneath the surface in all of us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

"

It's easy to blame political correctness. Is there any chance they're incapable of doing their jobs? Or law is in the way?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

"

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so."

What does it achieve reporting it ?.Why not, if you can confront the individual or group .Stand up.Dont walk away and make a phone call ..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so. What does it achieve reporting it ?.Why not, if you can confront the individual or group .Stand up.Dont walk away and make a phone call .."

Signs of radicalisation and hate crimes are not the same thing

Having an outrage is not a crime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other."

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so. What does it achieve reporting it ?.Why not, if you can confront the individual or group .Stand up.Dont walk away and make a phone call ..

Signs of radicalisation and hate crimes are not the same thing

Having an outrage is not a crime. "

ive never met a radicalized person.I have met people who hate others because of skin colour.I wouldn't waste my time reporting the shit ive seen.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label."

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label."

I doubt the individuals confronted bothered reporting it .If they felt that way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so. What does it achieve reporting it ?.Why not, if you can confront the individual or group .Stand up.Dont walk away and make a phone call .."

Well you can do both with mobile phones now

I would never condone vigilante/street justice, I think you should be reporting it, no one is above the law, not even us.

We are not trained in dealing with situations like that, we need to be speaking to the police and law enforcement agencies to prevent hate and extremism, because we need to stop the threats our communities.

We need to get a grip with reality, we need to support our police and law enforcement, if we do not use the structures to report crime and prevent it, we are losing the battle.

So support our police and law enforcment agencies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so. What does it achieve reporting it ?.Why not, if you can confront the individual or group .Stand up.Dont walk away and make a phone call ..

Signs of radicalisation and hate crimes are not the same thing

Having an outrage is not a crime. ive never met a radicalized person.I have met people who hate others because of skin colour.I wouldn't waste my time reporting the shit ive seen."

You don't need a reason to hate someone, hating people isn't a crime unless we are doing thought crimes now? It's the acting upon your hate that creates the crime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so."

I don't disagree.

I was listening to BBC radio last week. On Tuesday morning 5 Live's revolting Rachael Burden said as early as 6.00 am live on radio that the massacre had "brought communities together"!? On Thursday morning they broadcast muslims whingeing about Prevent and on Saturday morning R4 reported that GMP had reported that there had been a "spike in hate crimes" which their muslim guest completely missing the irony of his comment said were common after Europe-wide koran-inspired massacres.

The BBC and the GMP with their despicable PC propaganda left me wondering which the government and police considered to be worse: a 'hate crime' (e.g. someone throwing paint on a door) or someone killing and maiming children and their parents with shrapnel-laced high explosives!?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so. What does it achieve reporting it ?.Why not, if you can confront the individual or group .Stand up.Dont walk away and make a phone call ..

Signs of radicalisation and hate crimes are not the same thing

Having an outrage is not a crime. ive never met a radicalized person.I have met people who hate others because of skin colour.I wouldn't waste my time reporting the shit ive seen.

You don't need a reason to hate someone, hating people isn't a crime unless we are doing thought crimes now? It's the acting upon your hate that creates the crime. "

Well thats standard.If your prepared to vocalise your hate by abuseing someone. You're acting upon it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so. What does it achieve reporting it ?.Why not, if you can confront the individual or group .Stand up.Dont walk away and make a phone call ..

Signs of radicalisation and hate crimes are not the same thing

Having an outrage is not a crime. ive never met a radicalized person.I have met people who hate others because of skin colour.I wouldn't waste my time reporting the shit ive seen.

You don't need a reason to hate someone, hating people isn't a crime unless we are doing thought crimes now? It's the acting upon your hate that creates the crime. Well thats standard.If your prepared to vocalise your hate by abuseing someone. You're acting upon it."

Yes but most of us are perfectly capable of holding the majority of the population in contempt without acting upon it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so.

I don't disagree.

I was listening to BBC radio last week. On Tuesday morning 5 Live's revolting Rachael Burden said as early as 6.00 am live on radio that the massacre had "brought communities together"!? On Thursday morning they broadcast muslims whingeing about Prevent and on Saturday morning R4 reported that GMP had reported that there had been a "spike in hate crimes" which their muslim guest completely missing the irony of his comment said were common after Europe-wide koran-inspired massacres.

The BBC and the GMP with their despicable PC propaganda left me wondering which the government and police considered to be worse: a 'hate crime' (e.g. someone throwing paint on a door) or someone killing and maiming children and their parents with shrapnel-laced high explosives!?"

You need to stop all crime, again I point out in order for law and order to be effective, you cannot be as relaxed on the what people consider minor crimes.

Justice is blind for a reason, it does not take into account who or what you are, if you commit the crime, you are punishable under the eyes of the law. Simple as.

The law is not selective, they are there for general public safety, that is the social contract we have and as responsible people we must help enforce the norms and values of this great nation.

So to live in a fair and tolerant society, we must support our law enforcement agencies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so. What does it achieve reporting it ?.Why not, if you can confront the individual or group .Stand up.Dont walk away and make a phone call ..

Signs of radicalisation and hate crimes are not the same thing

Having an outrage is not a crime. ive never met a radicalized person.I have met people who hate others because of skin colour.I wouldn't waste my time reporting the shit ive seen.

You don't need a reason to hate someone, hating people isn't a crime unless we are doing thought crimes now? It's the acting upon your hate that creates the crime. Well thats standard.If your prepared to vocalise your hate by abuseing someone. You're acting upon it.

Yes but most of us are perfectly capable of holding the majority of the population in contempt without acting upon it."

Ive never acted upon a thought crime.I will like most parents act if someone attempts to abuse their child in public .Standard for everyone i know.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so. What does it achieve reporting it ?.Why not, if you can confront the individual or group .Stand up.Dont walk away and make a phone call ..

Signs of radicalisation and hate crimes are not the same thing

Having an outrage is not a crime. ive never met a radicalized person.I have met people who hate others because of skin colour.I wouldn't waste my time reporting the shit ive seen.

You don't need a reason to hate someone, hating people isn't a crime unless we are doing thought crimes now? It's the acting upon your hate that creates the crime. Well thats standard.If your prepared to vocalise your hate by abuseing someone. You're acting upon it.

Yes but most of us are perfectly capable of holding the majority of the population in contempt without acting upon it."

There is a fine line between thoughts and actions, however allowing it to happen because of those thoughts prevented you from reporting it is self defeating, and it allows those want to do harm think they are winning.

If we all want to make sure that we can all live safely from threats we need to be more active in reporting crimes so use it

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

https://www.gov.uk/report-terrorism

http://www.report-it.org.uk/your_police_force

So work with our law enforcement and support them. Help them, help protect and serve us.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just wanted to make sure you are all aware before anything gets out of hand. If you see it report it.

http://report-it.org.uk/what_is_hate_crime

I am sure we are all responsible adults who takes their duty as good citizens to report any and all forms of hate speech. "

So.. What if someone shouts something bazed on their target being overweight? Or shouting'ya thick bastard' etc..? Is that a hate crime

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just wanted to make sure you are all aware before anything gets out of hand. If you see it report it.

http://report-it.org.uk/what_is_hate_crime

I am sure we are all responsible adults who takes their duty as good citizens to report any and all forms of hate speech.

So.. What if someone shouts something bazed on their target being overweight? Or shouting'ya thick bastard' etc..? Is that a hate crime"

If so 5he we'd need an extra million police on the streets

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I think as adults we have been brought up with a sense of right and wrong, we should know the difference.

If it means that we can stop criminals yes I would be happy to support that, If it means it acts as a deterrent to would be criminals, then yes I support that also.

I say reporting crime is important so police and government can tackle the causes and stop it from happening.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wingtolifeCouple
over a year ago

who knows

we have laws in place for a lot of these things, seems we are creating a snow flake generation and seems to report on anything.

bit similar with the nhs with people going to hospital with the most silly reasons, nothing a trip to boots or pharmacist can provide.

instead of wasting valuable proffessional time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"I think as adults we have been brought up with a sense of right and wrong, we should know the difference.

If it means that we can stop criminals yes I would be happy to support that, If it means it acts as a deterrent to would be criminals, then yes I support that also.

I say reporting crime is important so police and government can tackle the causes and stop it from happening."

If you look into it, a rational objective person will realise the regular police have no resources to prevent crime or tackle the causes. They have been stipped of discretion, remit and resources. They are predominantly a reactive force who document evidence for later use in court.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"we have laws in place for a lot of these things, seems we are creating a snow flake generation and seems to report on anything.

bit similar with the nhs with people going to hospital with the most silly reasons, nothing a trip to boots or pharmacist can provide.

instead of wasting valuable proffessional time"

True, there is no burden of proof that a hate crime has to be motivated by hate. It's just an ordinary crime where the alledged victim feels that it might have been motivated by hate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I think as adults we have been brought up with a sense of right and wrong, we should know the difference.

If it means that we can stop criminals yes I would be happy to support that, If it means it acts as a deterrent to would be criminals, then yes I support that also.

I say reporting crime is important so police and government can tackle the causes and stop it from happening.

If you look into it, a rational objective person will realise the regular police have no resources to prevent crime or tackle the causes. They have been stipped of discretion, remit and resources. They are predominantly a reactive force who document evidence for later use in court. "

So a solution would be to support law enforcement and provide extra resources though funding to help them in their efforts to maintain law and order, and stop crime. I think people fail to see the work they do on a regualr basis, the many things they do already.

Like I said we must do our job to help fight crime also, and only by reporting and informing law enforcement, do we actually provide the evidence to ask for the investment needed.

Tackling crime and the causes of crime is a responsibility for everyone. So our duty as civilians is clear we support and report.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"we have laws in place for a lot of these things, seems we are creating a snow flake generation and seems to report on anything.

bit similar with the nhs with people going to hospital with the most silly reasons, nothing a trip to boots or pharmacist can provide.

instead of wasting valuable proffessional time

True, there is no burden of proof that a hate crime has to be motivated by hate. It's just an ordinary crime where the alledged victim feels that it might have been motivated by hate. "

So why is it considered a crime then? There must be some truth to what is going on, if not then it would not be a crime?

Crimes may not be perceived by the perpetrator as crimes, and that is where in lies the problem.

Our shared values and through societal consensus has agreed we must all follow the same laws if we are to live in this country. Those who commit these crimes must be punished.

Therefore we must do our duty as citizens to ensure we support and inform our law enforcement agencies of crimes against our shared norms and values. Isn't that right?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A little bit of civil courage makes society a better place.

Speak up in situations marked by injustice and racist discrimination instead of relying on others to do the job for you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"I think as adults we have been brought up with a sense of right and wrong, we should know the difference.

If it means that we can stop criminals yes I would be happy to support that, If it means it acts as a deterrent to would be criminals, then yes I support that also.

I say reporting crime is important so police and government can tackle the causes and stop it from happening.

If you look into it, a rational objective person will realise the regular police have no resources to prevent crime or tackle the causes. They have been stipped of discretion, remit and resources. They are predominantly a reactive force who document evidence for later use in court.

So a solution would be to support law enforcement and provide extra resources though funding to help them in their efforts to maintain law and order, and stop crime. I think people fail to see the work they do on a regualr basis, the many things they do already.

Like I said we must do our job to help fight crime also, and only by reporting and informing law enforcement, do we actually provide the evidence to ask for the investment needed.

Tackling crime and the causes of crime is a responsibility for everyone. So our duty as civilians is clear we support and report.

"

Last time i checked the police were already 100% taxpayer funded. If you think they need more taxpayer funds then maybe speak to your MP rather than fab forums.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"we have laws in place for a lot of these things, seems we are creating a snow flake generation and seems to report on anything.

bit similar with the nhs with people going to hospital with the most silly reasons, nothing a trip to boots or pharmacist can provide.

instead of wasting valuable proffessional time

True, there is no burden of proof that a hate crime has to be motivated by hate. It's just an ordinary crime where the alledged victim feels that it might have been motivated by hate.

So why is it considered a crime then? There must be some truth to what is going on, if not then it would not be a crime?

Crimes may not be perceived by the perpetrator as crimes, and that is where in lies the problem.

Our shared values and through societal consensus has agreed we must all follow the same laws if we are to live in this country. Those who commit these crimes must be punished.

Therefore we must do our duty as citizens to ensure we support and inform our law enforcement agencies of crimes against our shared norms and values. Isn't that right?"

What on earth are you talking about? If i punch someone, it's a crime. If i punch someone who is a different colour to me, they might assume that's that causes and record it as a hate crime but ultimately it's still exactly the same crime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"we have laws in place for a lot of these things, seems we are creating a snow flake generation and seems to report on anything.

bit similar with the nhs with people going to hospital with the most silly reasons, nothing a trip to boots or pharmacist can provide.

instead of wasting valuable proffessional time

True, there is no burden of proof that a hate crime has to be motivated by hate. It's just an ordinary crime where the alledged victim feels that it might have been motivated by hate.

So why is it considered a crime then? There must be some truth to what is going on, if not then it would not be a crime?

Crimes may not be perceived by the perpetrator as crimes, and that is where in lies the problem.

Our shared values and through societal consensus has agreed we must all follow the same laws if we are to live in this country. Those who commit these crimes must be punished.

Therefore we must do our duty as citizens to ensure we support and inform our law enforcement agencies of crimes against our shared norms and values. Isn't that right?

What on earth are you talking about? If i punch someone, it's a crime. If i punch someone who is a different colour to me, they might assume that's that causes and record it as a hate crime but ultimately it's still exactly the same crime. "

What if you only punch people of a different colour?

Or pour petrol through the letter box of a wheel chair bound person because the council put in a parking place for them..?

Crime is crime yes but some who target others because the are not only scrote's but racist, homophobes and hate disabled people cos they get everything off the state surely deserve that to be recorded lest we end with us with some arseholes getting just a caution or something because they just punch people a lot..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

Not you. They..

Oops

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Salman Abedi was reported on a number of occasions including the fact of his outrage that a former teacher of his criticised suicide bombers.

In fact it now appears that even the FBI contacted MI5 about him!? Thanks to cringing, grovelling political correctness however these warnings were resolutely ignored as of course it would have been racist to even bring him for an interview!? If the police had brought him in earlier 22 women and children might still be alive while fifty others would have been spared the agony of their life-changing injuries.

Now remind me...about these 'hate crimes'.

That is exactly what I am talking about, that is why this country need more resources, more police, more specialists in challenging extremists and hate mongers, and we should support our front line services, who do the toughest job.

Reporting hate/extremism is for everyone!. Do not think for a second it is just one section of the british community.

I am sure people are not against the police or security services here.

So you need to report extremist behaviour, by contacting

https://crimestoppers-uk.org/

It is our collective responsibility to do so. What does it achieve reporting it ?.Why not, if you can confront the individual or group .Stand up.Dont walk away and make a phone call ..

Signs of radicalisation and hate crimes are not the same thing

Having an outrage is not a crime. ive never met a radicalized person.I have met people who hate others because of skin colour.I wouldn't waste my time reporting the shit ive seen.

You don't need a reason to hate someone, hating people isn't a crime unless we are doing thought crimes now? It's the acting upon your hate that creates the crime. Well thats standard.If your prepared to vocalise your hate by abuseing someone. You're acting upon it.

Yes but most of us are perfectly capable of holding the majority of the population in contempt without acting upon it. Ive never acted upon a thought crime.I will like most parents act if someone attempts to abuse their child in public .Standard for everyone i know."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I think as adults we have been brought up with a sense of right and wrong, we should know the difference.

If it means that we can stop criminals yes I would be happy to support that, If it means it acts as a deterrent to would be criminals, then yes I support that also.

I say reporting crime is important so police and government can tackle the causes and stop it from happening.

If you look into it, a rational objective person will realise the regular police have no resources to prevent crime or tackle the causes. They have been stipped of discretion, remit and resources. They are predominantly a reactive force who document evidence for later use in court.

So a solution would be to support law enforcement and provide extra resources though funding to help them in their efforts to maintain law and order, and stop crime. I think people fail to see the work they do on a regualr basis, the many things they do already.

Like I said we must do our job to help fight crime also, and only by reporting and informing law enforcement, do we actually provide the evidence to ask for the investment needed.

Tackling crime and the causes of crime is a responsibility for everyone. So our duty as civilians is clear we support and report.

Last time i checked the police were already 100% taxpayer funded. If you think they need more taxpayer funds then maybe speak to your MP rather than fab forums. "

Yes and we must provide more money to them, I just wanted to put it out that we as a society need to do more, the MP's know already, but information needs to be disseminated and people should know the right places to report incidents. We need to prevent crime from occuring, so reporting it needs to be done. Its our duty to ensure a safe and secure place, therefore we must support and inform.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"we have laws in place for a lot of these things, seems we are creating a snow flake generation and seems to report on anything.

bit similar with the nhs with people going to hospital with the most silly reasons, nothing a trip to boots or pharmacist can provide.

instead of wasting valuable proffessional time"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"we have laws in place for a lot of these things, seems we are creating a snow flake generation and seems to report on anything.

bit similar with the nhs with people going to hospital with the most silly reasons, nothing a trip to boots or pharmacist can provide.

instead of wasting valuable proffessional time

True, there is no burden of proof that a hate crime has to be motivated by hate. It's just an ordinary crime where the alledged victim feels that it might have been motivated by hate.

So why is it considered a crime then? There must be some truth to what is going on, if not then it would not be a crime?

Crimes may not be perceived by the perpetrator as crimes, and that is where in lies the problem.

Our shared values and through societal consensus has agreed we must all follow the same laws if we are to live in this country. Those who commit these crimes must be punished.

Therefore we must do our duty as citizens to ensure we support and inform our law enforcement agencies of crimes against our shared norms and values. Isn't that right?

What on earth are you talking about? If i punch someone, it's a crime. If i punch someone who is a different colour to me, they might assume that's that causes and record it as a hate crime but ultimately it's still exactly the same crime. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"we have laws in place for a lot of these things, seems we are creating a snow flake generation and seems to report on anything.

bit similar with the nhs with people going to hospital with the most silly reasons, nothing a trip to boots or pharmacist can provide.

instead of wasting valuable proffessional time

True, there is no burden of proof that a hate crime has to be motivated by hate. It's just an ordinary crime where the alledged victim feels that it might have been motivated by hate.

So why is it considered a crime then? There must be some truth to what is going on, if not then it would not be a crime?

Crimes may not be perceived by the perpetrator as crimes, and that is where in lies the problem.

Our shared values and through societal consensus has agreed we must all follow the same laws if we are to live in this country. Those who commit these crimes must be punished.

Therefore we must do our duty as citizens to ensure we support and inform our law enforcement agencies of crimes against our shared norms and values. Isn't that right?

What on earth are you talking about? If i punch someone, it's a crime. If i punch someone who is a different colour to me, they might assume that's that causes and record it as a hate crime but ultimately it's still exactly the same crime.

What if you only punch people of a different colour?

Or pour petrol through the letter box of a wheel chair bound person because the council put in a parking place for them..?

Crime is crime yes but some who target others because the are not only scrote's but racist, homophobes and hate disabled people cos they get everything off the state surely deserve that to be recorded lest we end with us with some arseholes getting just a caution or something because they just punch people a lot.."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

The law is reason free from passion, therefore the law needs to ensure that the right information is provided to ensure the law is accurate and the punishment fits the crime.

I feel many people are afraid of speaking out against crimes, and I think we need to support our law enforement agencies in identifying and capturing the right information to stop criminals from believing they are above the law and immune.

If we cannot classify the type of crime, however are we ever to defeat it? Its like telling law enforcement to stop a thief with both arms tied behind their back.

Law enforcement need facts, so we must report and inform, and provide more money to law enforcement.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"I think as adults we have been brought up with a sense of right and wrong, we should know the difference.

If it means that we can stop criminals yes I would be happy to support that, If it means it acts as a deterrent to would be criminals, then yes I support that also.

I say reporting crime is important so police and government can tackle the causes and stop it from happening.

If you look into it, a rational objective person will realise the regular police have no resources to prevent crime or tackle the causes. They have been stipped of discretion, remit and resources. They are predominantly a reactive force who document evidence for later use in court.

So a solution would be to support law enforcement and provide extra resources though funding to help them in their efforts to maintain law and order, and stop crime. I think people fail to see the work they do on a regualr basis, the many things they do already.

Like I said we must do our job to help fight crime also, and only by reporting and informing law enforcement, do we actually provide the evidence to ask for the investment needed.

Tackling crime and the causes of crime is a responsibility for everyone. So our duty as civilians is clear we support and report.

Last time i checked the police were already 100% taxpayer funded. If you think they need more taxpayer funds then maybe speak to your MP rather than fab forums.

Yes and we must provide more money to them, I just wanted to put it out that we as a society need to do more, the MP's know already, but information needs to be disseminated and people should know the right places to report incidents. We need to prevent crime from occuring, so reporting it needs to be done. Its our duty to ensure a safe and secure place, therefore we must support and inform."

I don't agree!

Doing more does not equate to more money ! Sometimes its actually the opposite!

For me, doing more as a society , means all have to have and accept individual responsibility !

That means education , respect , for others , and two simple principles !

-My freedom ends where yours begins !

-Dont do to others , what you wouldn't want others to do to you !

Apply these two , and you will be fine !

There will always be people that will be abusive and not respect others , and if we are permissive , they will continue and only get worse !

This new notion of "reporting" everything is making things worse, not better!

Never mind the fact it has a very "Orwellian" tint , but its actually starting to be a "thought police" of sorts, even starting to function as a form of censorship!!

As some have put, expressing you sentiment is one thing , acting it out is another !

Only yesterday I was watching a documentary on how this form of reporting all, and the PC attitude that comes with it ,is creating in the Millennial generation the notion that free speech should be curbed !

Over 50% thought that limiting free speech is acceptable if it prevents "hate speech" !

Its time peolple start taking responsibility for their actions as individuals ,and active members of society, and stop delegating that to the Police and government!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"The law is reason free from passion, therefore the law needs to ensure that the right information is provided to ensure the law is accurate and the punishment fits the crime.

I feel many people are afraid of speaking out against crimes, and I think we need to support our law enforement agencies in identifying and capturing the right information to stop criminals from believing they are above the law and immune.

If we cannot classify the type of crime, however are we ever to defeat it? Its like telling law enforcement to stop a thief with both arms tied behind their back.

Law enforcement need facts, so we must report and inform, and provide more money to law enforcement."

I don't like your tone.... its a bit too "too police state" for my comfort ....

We , or most can tell right from wrong !

If you/anyone need/s the law to tell you that, then there is something very wrong with you !

Its know that very often what is legal isn't necessarily right or just , and what is right and just , isn't legal !

That is why there are laws and moral principles!

Putting your trust in the law and the police/authorities alone is a very dangerous thing !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I think as adults we have been brought up with a sense of right and wrong, we should know the difference.

If it means that we can stop criminals yes I would be happy to support that, If it means it acts as a deterrent to would be criminals, then yes I support that also.

I say reporting crime is important so police and government can tackle the causes and stop it from happening.

If you look into it, a rational objective person will realise the regular police have no resources to prevent crime or tackle the causes. They have been stipped of discretion, remit and resources. They are predominantly a reactive force who document evidence for later use in court.

So a solution would be to support law enforcement and provide extra resources though funding to help them in their efforts to maintain law and order, and stop crime. I think people fail to see the work they do on a regualr basis, the many things they do already.

Like I said we must do our job to help fight crime also, and only by reporting and informing law enforcement, do we actually provide the evidence to ask for the investment needed.

Tackling crime and the causes of crime is a responsibility for everyone. So our duty as civilians is clear we support and report.

Last time i checked the police were already 100% taxpayer funded. If you think they need more taxpayer funds then maybe speak to your MP rather than fab forums.

Yes and we must provide more money to them, I just wanted to put it out that we as a society need to do more, the MP's know already, but information needs to be disseminated and people should know the right places to report incidents. We need to prevent crime from occuring, so reporting it needs to be done. Its our duty to ensure a safe and secure place, therefore we must support and inform.

I don't agree!

Doing more does not equate to more money ! Sometimes its actually the opposite!

For me, doing more as a society , means all have to have and accept individual responsibility !

That means education , respect , for others , and two simple principles !

-My freedom ends where yours begins !

-Dont do to others , what you wouldn't want others to do to you !

Apply these two , and you will be fine !

There will always be people that will be abusive and not respect others , and if we are permissive , they will continue and only get worse !

This new notion of "reporting" everything is making things worse, not better!

Never mind the fact it has a very "Orwellian" tint , but its actually starting to be a "thought police" of sorts, even starting to function as a form of censorship!!

As some have put, expressing you sentiment is one thing , acting it out is another !

Only yesterday I was watching a documentary on how this form of reporting all, and the PC attitude that comes with it ,is creating in the Millennial generation the notion that free speech should be curbed !

Over 50% thought that limiting free speech is acceptable if it prevents "hate speech" !

Its time peolple start taking responsibility for their actions as individuals ,and active members of society, and stop delegating that to the Police and government! "

You are nearly there on a lot of the things you are saying. There is a fine line between though and actions, however thought is the primary driver of action so we must guard against anyone who tries to stop that thought turning into action

If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty.

It may be considered not cool to report and inform on people who do good people harm, but I believe we must tell the police what is going on if something wrong is happening. If you do not then you are just as guilty.

It does not matter what who or what you are, people should not be afraid of reporting crimes.

Terrible things can happen. We have to protect the UK from those who mean to do us harm, so we need to make sure.

Why should people be intimidated from reporting criminal activity for? It only perpetuates the evil that is done, the victims suffer, because justice is not being done.

So yes it is right to report criminal activity no matter how small or big. Crime is crime, and it takes a united effort to prevent it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think as adults we have been brought up with a sense of right and wrong, we should know the difference.

If it means that we can stop criminals yes I would be happy to support that, If it means it acts as a deterrent to would be criminals, then yes I support that also.

I say reporting crime is important so police and government can tackle the causes and stop it from happening.

If you look into it, a rational objective person will realise the regular police have no resources to prevent crime or tackle the causes. They have been stipped of discretion, remit and resources. They are predominantly a reactive force who document evidence for later use in court.

So a solution would be to support law enforcement and provide extra resources though funding to help them in their efforts to maintain law and order, and stop crime. I think people fail to see the work they do on a regualr basis, the many things they do already.

Like I said we must do our job to help fight crime also, and only by reporting and informing law enforcement, do we actually provide the evidence to ask for the investment needed.

Tackling crime and the causes of crime is a responsibility for everyone. So our duty as civilians is clear we support and report.

Last time i checked the police were already 100% taxpayer funded. If you think they need more taxpayer funds then maybe speak to your MP rather than fab forums.

Yes and we must provide more money to them, I just wanted to put it out that we as a society need to do more, the MP's know already, but information needs to be disseminated and people should know the right places to report incidents. We need to prevent crime from occuring, so reporting it needs to be done. Its our duty to ensure a safe and secure place, therefore we must support and inform.

I don't agree!

Doing more does not equate to more money ! Sometimes its actually the opposite!

For me, doing more as a society , means all have to have and accept individual responsibility !

That means education , respect , for others , and two simple principles !

-My freedom ends where yours begins !

-Dont do to others , what you wouldn't want others to do to you !

Apply these two , and you will be fine !

There will always be people that will be abusive and not respect others , and if we are permissive , they will continue and only get worse !

This new notion of "reporting" everything is making things worse, not better!

Never mind the fact it has a very "Orwellian" tint , but its actually starting to be a "thought police" of sorts, even starting to function as a form of censorship!!

As some have put, expressing you sentiment is one thing , acting it out is another !

Only yesterday I was watching a documentary on how this form of reporting all, and the PC attitude that comes with it ,is creating in the Millennial generation the notion that free speech should be curbed !

Over 50% thought that limiting free speech is acceptable if it prevents "hate speech" !

Its time peolple start taking responsibility for their actions as individuals ,and active members of society, and stop delegating that to the Police and government!

You are nearly there on a lot of the things you are saying. There is a fine line between though and actions, however thought is the primary driver of action so we must guard against anyone who tries to stop that thought turning into action

If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty.

It may be considered not cool to report and inform on people who do good people harm, but I believe we must tell the police what is going on if something wrong is happening. If you do not then you are just as guilty.

It does not matter what who or what you are, people should not be afraid of reporting crimes.

Terrible things can happen. We have to protect the UK from those who mean to do us harm, so we need to make sure.

Why should people be intimidated from reporting criminal activity for? It only perpetuates the evil that is done, the victims suffer, because justice is not being done.

So yes it is right to report criminal activity no matter how small or big. Crime is crime, and it takes a united effort to prevent it. "

Man walks into a pub and says 'I f.ckin hate such and such/whoever'. Is that a crime?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"I think as adults we have been brought up with a sense of right and wrong, we should know the difference.

If it means that we can stop criminals yes I would be happy to support that, If it means it acts as a deterrent to would be criminals, then yes I support that also.

I say reporting crime is important so police and government can tackle the causes and stop it from happening.

If you look into it, a rational objective person will realise the regular police have no resources to prevent crime or tackle the causes. They have been stipped of discretion, remit and resources. They are predominantly a reactive force who document evidence for later use in court.

So a solution would be to support law enforcement and provide extra resources though funding to help them in their efforts to maintain law and order, and stop crime. I think people fail to see the work they do on a regualr basis, the many things they do already.

Like I said we must do our job to help fight crime also, and only by reporting and informing law enforcement, do we actually provide the evidence to ask for the investment needed.

Tackling crime and the causes of crime is a responsibility for everyone. So our duty as civilians is clear we support and report.

Last time i checked the police were already 100% taxpayer funded. If you think they need more taxpayer funds then maybe speak to your MP rather than fab forums.

Yes and we must provide more money to them, I just wanted to put it out that we as a society need to do more, the MP's know already, but information needs to be disseminated and people should know the right places to report incidents. We need to prevent crime from occuring, so reporting it needs to be done. Its our duty to ensure a safe and secure place, therefore we must support and inform.

I don't agree!

Doing more does not equate to more money ! Sometimes its actually the opposite!

For me, doing more as a society , means all have to have and accept individual responsibility !

That means education , respect , for others , and two simple principles !

-My freedom ends where yours begins !

-Dont do to others , what you wouldn't want others to do to you !

Apply these two , and you will be fine !

There will always be people that will be abusive and not respect others , and if we are permissive , they will continue and only get worse !

This new notion of "reporting" everything is making things worse, not better!

Never mind the fact it has a very "Orwellian" tint , but its actually starting to be a "thought police" of sorts, even starting to function as a form of censorship!!

As some have put, expressing you sentiment is one thing , acting it out is another !

Only yesterday I was watching a documentary on how this form of reporting all, and the PC attitude that comes with it ,is creating in the Millennial generation the notion that free speech should be curbed !

Over 50% thought that limiting free speech is acceptable if it prevents "hate speech" !

Its time peolple start taking responsibility for their actions as individuals ,and active members of society, and stop delegating that to the Police and government!

You are nearly there on a lot of the things you are saying. There is a fine line between though and actions, however thought is the primary driver of action so we must guard against anyone who tries to stop that thought turning into action

If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty.

It may be considered not cool to report and inform on people who do good people harm, but I believe we must tell the police what is going on if something wrong is happening. If you do not then you are just as guilty.

It does not matter what who or what you are, people should not be afraid of reporting crimes.

Terrible things can happen. We have to protect the UK from those who mean to do us harm, so we need to make sure.

Why should people be intimidated from reporting criminal activity for? It only perpetuates the evil that is done, the victims suffer, because justice is not being done.

So yes it is right to report criminal activity no matter how small or big. Crime is crime, and it takes a united effort to prevent it.

Man walks into a pub and says 'I f.ckin hate such and such/whoever'. Is that a crime?"

That is precisely the problem !

Its way to easy to "label" , and to make "blanket" statements about "crime" reporting !

As we know , the devil lies in the detail ....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal

"If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty. "

Sorry !

This type of speech is a bit disturbing to me !

words comes to mind ....like GESTAPO , KGB, Stasi !

Not saying you support those , but unfortunately , my life experience has taught me the hard way that trusting the police and government can be very dangerous!

"the police and government are a important to law and order."

Maybe , but I don't trust or need them to set my moral compass ,or deal with everyday trivialities that might have to do with "hate speech" !

Besides ... they have a lot on their plate as it stands , and better things to do !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking ."

but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?"

That comment is wrong on so many levels

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?"

W.... T.... F?!?!

-Matt

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?"

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. "

ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 29/05/17 18:59:00]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?"

"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."

Nobody has the authority to say one race is superior, it's a conpletely subjective thing. There are black people who consider their race superior to whites and vice versa.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?

"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."

Nobody has the authority to say one race is superior, it's a conpletely subjective thing. There are black people who consider their race superior to whites and vice versa. "

one random person believing there race is superior is not racism but when you have entire contries aNd organisations its a completely different story so I ask you when have you seen entire countries of black people being racist to white people?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?

"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."

Nobody has the authority to say one race is superior, it's a conpletely subjective thing. There are black people who consider their race superior to whites and vice versa. one random person believing there race is superior is not racism but when you have entire contries aNd organisations its a completely different story so I ask you when have you seen entire countries of black people being racist to white people?"

Zimbabwe and South Africa spring to mind. You can believe whatever ideology you like about motivations for history but nobody ever went around the world colonising countries just because they felt superior. They did it because it was profitable and justifications came later after they had time to invent them.

Do you understand that the average person in Afghanistan believes their race is superior to white people? It's not about some objective standard we can measure, most people prefer their own race, that's just human pyschology 101.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?

"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."

Nobody has the authority to say one race is superior, it's a conpletely subjective thing. There are black people who consider their race superior to whites and vice versa. one random person believing there race is superior is not racism but when you have entire contries aNd organisations its a completely different story so I ask you when have you seen entire countries of black people being racist to white people?"

Wow ! Easy one :

Zimbabwe/ex Rhodesia

South Africa!

Not pc to say... but unfortunately true !

ps.FYI, The racism is not only limited to whites in the mentioned examples!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?

"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."

Nobody has the authority to say one race is superior, it's a conpletely subjective thing. There are black people who consider their race superior to whites and vice versa. one random person believing there race is superior is not racism but when you have entire contries aNd organisations its a completely different story so I ask you when have you seen entire countries of black people being racist to white people?

Zimbabwe and South Africa spring to mind. You can believe whatever ideology you like about motivations for history but nobody ever went around the world colonising countries just because they felt superior. They did it because it was profitable and justifications came later after they had time to invent them.

Do you understand that the average person in Afghanistan believes their race is superior to white people? It's not about some objective standard we can measure, most people prefer their own race, that's just human pyschology 101. "

south Africa?? Seriously..next you will telling me the apartide did nothing wrong I believe in reality and as a black man myself i believe racism is not someone believing their race is superior it was when lots of people that and have the power to do something about it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?

"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."

Nobody has the authority to say one race is superior, it's a conpletely subjective thing. There are black people who consider their race superior to whites and vice versa. one random person believing there race is superior is not racism but when you have entire contries aNd organisations its a completely different story so I ask you when have you seen entire countries of black people being racist to white people?

Zimbabwe and South Africa spring to mind. You can believe whatever ideology you like about motivations for history but nobody ever went around the world colonising countries just because they felt superior. They did it because it was profitable and justifications came later after they had time to invent them.

Do you understand that the average person in Afghanistan believes their race is superior to white people? It's not about some objective standard we can measure, most people prefer their own race, that's just human pyschology 101. "

lol.... you beat me to it ......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?

"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."

Nobody has the authority to say one race is superior, it's a conpletely subjective thing. There are black people who consider their race superior to whites and vice versa. one random person believing there race is superior is not racism but when you have entire contries aNd organisations its a completely different story so I ask you when have you seen entire countries of black people being racist to white people?

Zimbabwe and South Africa spring to mind. You can believe whatever ideology you like about motivations for history but nobody ever went around the world colonising countries just because they felt superior. They did it because it was profitable and justifications came later after they had time to invent them.

Do you understand that the average person in Afghanistan believes their race is superior to white people? It's not about some objective standard we can measure, most people prefer their own race, that's just human pyschology 101. south Africa?? Seriously..next you will telling me the apartide did nothing wrong I believe in reality and as a black man myself i believe racism is not someone believing their race is superior it was when lots of people that and have the power to do something about it "

What a pathetic immature thing to say about apartheid. Two wrongs don't make a right, didn't you get the memo!

Go ahead and live your life as a perpetual victim, nothing guarantees failure like believing success is impossible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?

"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."

Nobody has the authority to say one race is superior, it's a conpletely subjective thing. There are black people who consider their race superior to whites and vice versa. one random person believing there race is superior is not racism but when you have entire contries aNd organisations its a completely different story so I ask you when have you seen entire countries of black people being racist to white people?

Zimbabwe and South Africa spring to mind. You can believe whatever ideology you like about motivations for history but nobody ever went around the world colonising countries just because they felt superior. They did it because it was profitable and justifications came later after they had time to invent them.

Do you understand that the average person in Afghanistan believes their race is superior to white people? It's not about some objective standard we can measure, most people prefer their own race, that's just human pyschology 101. south Africa?? Seriously..next you will telling me the apartide did nothing wrong I believe in reality and as a black man myself i believe racism is not someone believing their race is superior it was when lots of people that and have the power to do something about it "

Just curious... as a black man , where were you born and brought up ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... "
now you're just being silly but like I said ....a black man telling a white man he hates him cuz he's white is no crime or racism it's no different from a white man telling a white man he hates him cuz he's ginger however if a black tells a white he hates him then the white man goes to a black owned bar and they don't serve him cuz he's white then he applies for a job at a black owned company and he doesn't get the job cuz these white ..that is racism someones belief alone doesn't count for shit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?

"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."

Nobody has the authority to say one race is superior, it's a conpletely subjective thing. There are black people who consider their race superior to whites and vice versa. one random person believing there race is superior is not racism but when you have entire contries aNd organisations its a completely different story so I ask you when have you seen entire countries of black people being racist to white people?

Zimbabwe and South Africa spring to mind. You can believe whatever ideology you like about motivations for history but nobody ever went around the world colonising countries just because they felt superior. They did it because it was profitable and justifications came later after they had time to invent them.

Do you understand that the average person in Afghanistan believes their race is superior to white people? It's not about some objective standard we can measure, most people prefer their own race, that's just human pyschology 101. south Africa?? Seriously..next you will telling me the apartide did nothing wrong I believe in reality and as a black man myself i believe racism is not someone believing their race is superior it was when lots of people that and have the power to do something about it

Just curious... as a black man , where were you born and brought up ? "

I was born and raised in the Caribbean if that helps

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... now you're just being silly but like I said ....a black man telling a white man he hates him cuz he's white is no crime or racism it's no different from a white man telling a white man he hates him cuz he's ginger however if a black tells a white he hates him then the white man goes to a black owned bar and they don't serve him cuz he's white then he applies for a job at a black owned company and he doesn't get the job cuz these white ..that is racism someones belief alone doesn't count for shit "

Serious question, what % of people that are paid up members of the KKK do you suppose primarily join because they hate black people?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"My kids have experienced hate crimes twice since brexit. Never would i call the police. My son and daughter dealt with one incident themselves. I SORTED the other.

Wasn't that a hate crime in its own right then?

I am making a serious point. Any act of violence or vandalism is a hate crime. Its just another label.

Hate crime has become to be regarded as being against someone because of their race/colour/belief/disability/appearance etc....that's why people are hesitant to report people who fall into these categories for fear of being blamed for the same themselves.

This is a perception perpetrated by media, (left wing) liberalism etc but has become accepted by aspects of law enforcement.

It's almost like the "you can't be racist if your black" kind of thinking . but you actually can't be racist of you're black ...the definition or racism is the submission and ill treatment of one race but a superior race when have black people ever been the superior race?

Er no, that's a made up definition, not widely accepted and patently stupid. It was invented by BLM to serve their own purposes. ok well check the dictionary and tell me if it's wrong ...see if it doesn't say superior race?

"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior."

Nobody has the authority to say one race is superior, it's a conpletely subjective thing. There are black people who consider their race superior to whites and vice versa. one random person believing there race is superior is not racism but when you have entire contries aNd organisations its a completely different story so I ask you when have you seen entire countries of black people being racist to white people?

Zimbabwe and South Africa spring to mind. You can believe whatever ideology you like about motivations for history but nobody ever went around the world colonising countries just because they felt superior. They did it because it was profitable and justifications came later after they had time to invent them.

Do you understand that the average person in Afghanistan believes their race is superior to white people? It's not about some objective standard we can measure, most people prefer their own race, that's just human pyschology 101. south Africa?? Seriously..next you will telling me the apartide did nothing wrong I believe in reality and as a black man myself i believe racism is not someone believing their race is superior it was when lots of people that and have the power to do something about it

Just curious... as a black man , where were you born and brought up ? I was born and raised in the Caribbean if that helps "

Yes..... partly !

Have you ever been to Africa ? Black Africa I mean ! Not North Africa !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... "
Silly questions

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions "

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories "

racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn "

Gonna answer my question above or keeping fighting strawman arguements?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn

Gonna answer my question above or keeping fighting strawman arguements? "

seeing that I'm not mixed race then I cannot answer that question and as it seems you're very convinced in your own opinion then maybe the answer wouldn't do you much good

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn

Gonna answer my question above or keeping fighting strawman arguements? seeing that I'm not mixed race then I cannot answer that question and as it seems you're very convinced in your own opinion then maybe the answer wouldn't do you much good"

The kkk one, not the mixed race one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


""If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty. "

Sorry !

This type of speech is a bit disturbing to me !

words comes to mind ....like GESTAPO , KGB, Stasi !

Not saying you support those , but unfortunately , my life experience has taught me the hard way that trusting the police and government can be very dangerous!

"the police and government are a important to law and order."

Maybe , but I don't trust or need them to set my moral compass ,or deal with everyday trivialities that might have to do with "hate speech" !

Besides ... they have a lot on their plate as it stands , and better things to do ! "

If we trivilise the types of crimes being commited we might as well say that anyone can get away with anything.

Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy.

What I say is to help prevent crimes, I do not want to see chaos or disorder on the streets and I bet many people do not want to see it either.

Threats to the UK come from all quarters, people need to inform if they see something wrong, there should be no exceptions.

The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology.

It not wrong to tell the police if a crime has been commited.

For people who stay law abiding it is not hard to stay within the law. I am talking about those who think they are above the law, who think they can get away with anything, you know the criminals who think they can do or say anything because they think they are immune from prosecution.

I say it again, we need to report it and inform to the police about these criminal types as a deterrent, that the behaviours are contrary to our great society and they will not be tolerated.

So support law enforcement and report any criminal activity.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


""If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty. "

Sorry !

This type of speech is a bit disturbing to me !

words comes to mind ....like GESTAPO , KGB, Stasi !

Not saying you support those , but unfortunately , my life experience has taught me the hard way that trusting the police and government can be very dangerous!

"the police and government are a important to law and order."

Maybe , but I don't trust or need them to set my moral compass ,or deal with everyday trivialities that might have to do with "hate speech" !

Besides ... they have a lot on their plate as it stands , and better things to do !

If we trivilise the types of crimes being commited we might as well say that anyone can get away with anything.

Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy.

What I say is to help prevent crimes, I do not want to see chaos or disorder on the streets and I bet many people do not want to see it either.

Threats to the UK come from all quarters, people need to inform if they see something wrong, there should be no exceptions.

The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology.

It not wrong to tell the police if a crime has been commited.

For people who stay law abiding it is not hard to stay within the law. I am talking about those who think they are above the law, who think they can get away with anything, you know the criminals who think they can do or say anything because they think they are immune from prosecution.

I say it again, we need to report it and inform to the police about these criminal types as a deterrent, that the behaviours are contrary to our great society and they will not be tolerated.

So support law enforcement and report any criminal activity."

The problem with your premise is you keep referring to crimes!

And that is misleading !

If you are referring to robbery, murder, r*pe, k*dnapping , extortion, yes there is no doubt those are crimes ,and if you witnessed , or have info , you should report it !

Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime !

"Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy."

I don't think if George Orwell was alive he would agree with you ! An neither do I!

Britain is the country with the highest number of "security" surveillance camera system in the world ! All in the name of our "safety"

So how mature is a democracy that doesn't trust its citizens and feels the need to film and record them 24/7 ?

"The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology."

You mean like..... more cameras and drones with cameras to supplement the choppers perving into our backyards?

And more officers to sit around watching those cameras ?

Oh wait... perhaps a police camera in every home !

I think not !

So lets keep a cool head and not confuse

things !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn "

I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


""If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty. "

Sorry !

This type of speech is a bit disturbing to me !

words comes to mind ....like GESTAPO , KGB, Stasi !

Not saying you support those , but unfortunately , my life experience has taught me the hard way that trusting the police and government can be very dangerous!

"the police and government are a important to law and order."

Maybe , but I don't trust or need them to set my moral compass ,or deal with everyday trivialities that might have to do with "hate speech" !

Besides ... they have a lot on their plate as it stands , and better things to do !

If we trivilise the types of crimes being commited we might as well say that anyone can get away with anything.

Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy.

What I say is to help prevent crimes, I do not want to see chaos or disorder on the streets and I bet many people do not want to see it either.

Threats to the UK come from all quarters, people need to inform if they see something wrong, there should be no exceptions.

The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology.

It not wrong to tell the police if a crime has been commited.

For people who stay law abiding it is not hard to stay within the law. I am talking about those who think they are above the law, who think they can get away with anything, you know the criminals who think they can do or say anything because they think they are immune from prosecution.

I say it again, we need to report it and inform to the police about these criminal types as a deterrent, that the behaviours are contrary to our great society and they will not be tolerated.

So support law enforcement and report any criminal activity.

The problem with your premise is you keep referring to crimes!

And that is misleading !

If you are referring to robbery, murder, r*pe, k*dnapping , extortion, yes there is no doubt those are crimes ,and if you witnessed , or have info , you should report it !

Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime !

"Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy."

I don't think if George Orwell was alive he would agree with you ! An neither do I!

Britain is the country with the highest number of "security" surveillance camera system in the world ! All in the name of our "safety"

So how mature is a democracy that doesn't trust its citizens and feels the need to film and record them 24/7 ?

"The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology."

You mean like..... more cameras and drones with cameras to supplement the choppers perving into our backyards?

And more officers to sit around watching those cameras ?

Oh wait... perhaps a police camera in every home !

I think not !

So lets keep a cool head and not confuse

things ! "

Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law.

People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so.

Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime.

When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime.

Yes as a responsible democracy would use alternative means to out criminal behaviour.

Therefore, we must as responsible people ensure that we are doing our bit, by reporting crimes.

I do not simply buy into this selective crime angle. We are all subject to the same laws in the UK, no exception. If anyone was subject to malicious and hateful mistreatment at the hands of another, I would report that person post haste.

Therefore, I think the government trusts us to make decisions, we vote on matters which affect us hence we are a democracy.

I think the main myth and exaggeration is that the UK police want cameras everywhere. They want to protect the public but they are subject to the law also.

But again we should be reporting crimes no matter what, it is our responsibility, we must assist the police in stopping crime. If we want to ensure that democracy and rule of law are safe we must take responsibility and report and inform.

So support our law enforcement, and ensure we are doing our bit in helping stopping and preventing crime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well.. "

Which institutions in this country are racist? Just your top 3 please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well..

Which institutions in this country are racist? Just your top 3 please"

Google has all the answers you need.There are enough studies on the school system failing afro cartibean boys from kindergarten onwards to keep you reading for a year .The police force has numerous reports on it.The fire service also .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well..

Which institutions in this country are racist? Just your top 3 pleaseGoogle has all the answers you need.There are enough studies on the school system failing afro cartibean boys from kindergarten onwards to keep you reading for a year .The police force has numerous reports on it.The fire service also ."

That's interesting because the only place that institutional racism could sustainably last would be either in government or a monopoly, perhaps oligopoly. And then there are people that want to bring more things under state control (shudder)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well..

Which institutions in this country are racist? Just your top 3 pleaseGoogle has all the answers you need.There are enough studies on the school system failing afro cartibean boys from kindergarten onwards to keep you reading for a year .The police force has numerous reports on it.The fire service also .

That's interesting because the only place that institutional racism could sustainably last would be either in government or a monopoly, perhaps oligopoly. And then there are people that want to bring more things under state control (shudder)"

Thanks for agreeing with me.I listed 3 services run by the state.Of course it also exists outside of the state.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well..

Which institutions in this country are racist? Just your top 3 pleaseGoogle has all the answers you need.There are enough studies on the school system failing afro cartibean boys from kindergarten onwards to keep you reading for a year .The police force has numerous reports on it.The fire service also .

That's interesting because the only place that institutional racism could sustainably last would be either in government or a monopoly, perhaps oligopoly. And then there are people that want to bring more things under state control (shudder)Thanks for agreeing with me.I listed 3 services run by the state.Of course it also exists outside of the state.

"

Not really and not on any kind of scale. If you're saying institutional racism then that's more than just a bad manager or bad team. That simply can't sustain itself in a competitive market space. Unless you can name some major companies today that are institutionally racist? I will grant you royal mail though as it's recently privitised.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well..

Which institutions in this country are racist? Just your top 3 pleaseGoogle has all the answers you need.There are enough studies on the school system failing afro cartibean boys from kindergarten onwards to keep you reading for a year .The police force has numerous reports on it.The fire service also .

That's interesting because the only place that institutional racism could sustainably last would be either in government or a monopoly, perhaps oligopoly. And then there are people that want to bring more things under state control (shudder)Thanks for agreeing with me.I listed 3 services run by the state.Of course it also exists outside of the state.

Not really and not on any kind of scale. If you're saying institutional racism then that's more than just a bad manager or bad team. That simply can't sustain itself in a competitive market space. Unless you can name some major companies today that are institutionally racist? I will grant you royal mail though as it's recently privitised. "

They have been numerous studies into the school system.The police force and other services.That goes beyond individuals and has become culture.Its a thing. Denying it only makes it worse and benefits no one.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well..

Which institutions in this country are racist? Just your top 3 pleaseGoogle has all the answers you need.There are enough studies on the school system failing afro cartibean boys from kindergarten onwards to keep you reading for a year .The police force has numerous reports on it.The fire service also .

That's interesting because the only place that institutional racism could sustainably last would be either in government or a monopoly, perhaps oligopoly. And then there are people that want to bring more things under state control (shudder)Thanks for agreeing with me.I listed 3 services run by the state.Of course it also exists outside of the state.

Not really and not on any kind of scale. If you're saying institutional racism then that's more than just a bad manager or bad team. That simply can't sustain itself in a competitive market space. Unless you can name some major companies today that are institutionally racist? I will grant you royal mail though as it's recently privitised. They have been numerous studies into the school system.The police force and other services.That goes beyond individuals and has become culture.Its a thing. Denying it only makes it worse and benefits no one. "

No i accept it can happen in non-competitive organisations like the police. But it is illegal and against the explicit job descriptions of private companies so I'd love some examples of private sector companies that are institutionally racists and not operating in a monopoly or oligopoly?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well..

Which institutions in this country are racist? Just your top 3 pleaseGoogle has all the answers you need.There are enough studies on the school system failing afro cartibean boys from kindergarten onwards to keep you reading for a year .The police force has numerous reports on it.The fire service also .

That's interesting because the only place that institutional racism could sustainably last would be either in government or a monopoly, perhaps oligopoly. And then there are people that want to bring more things under state control (shudder)Thanks for agreeing with me.I listed 3 services run by the state.Of course it also exists outside of the state.

Not really and not on any kind of scale. If you're saying institutional racism then that's more than just a bad manager or bad team. That simply can't sustain itself in a competitive market space. Unless you can name some major companies today that are institutionally racist? I will grant you royal mail though as it's recently privitised. They have been numerous studies into the school system.The police force and other services.That goes beyond individuals and has become culture.Its a thing. Denying it only makes it worse and benefits no one.

No i accept it can happen in non-competitive organisations like the police. But it is illegal and against the explicit job descriptions of private companies so I'd love some examples of private sector companies that are institutionally racists and not operating in a monopoly or oligopoly? "

Radio 5 did an interesting experiment .

CVs from six fictitious candidates - who were given traditionally white, black African or Muslim names - were sent to 50 firms by Radio Five Live.

White "candidates" were far more likely to be given an interview than similarly qualified black or Asian "names"

The employers targeted by the undercover survey were selected at random from newspaper adverts and recruitment websites.

All the applicants were given the same standard of qualifications and experience, but their CVs were presented differently.

Almost a quarter of applications by two candidates given traditionally "white" names - Jenny Hughes and John Andrews - resulted in interview offers.

But only 9% of the "Muslim" applications, by the fictitious Fatima Khan and Nasser Hanif, prompted a similar response.

Letters from the "black" candidates, Abu Olasemi and Yinka Olatunde, had a 13% success rate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well..

Which institutions in this country are racist? Just your top 3 pleaseGoogle has all the answers you need.There are enough studies on the school system failing afro cartibean boys from kindergarten onwards to keep you reading for a year .The police force has numerous reports on it.The fire service also .

That's interesting because the only place that institutional racism could sustainably last would be either in government or a monopoly, perhaps oligopoly. And then there are people that want to bring more things under state control (shudder)Thanks for agreeing with me.I listed 3 services run by the state.Of course it also exists outside of the state.

Not really and not on any kind of scale. If you're saying institutional racism then that's more than just a bad manager or bad team. That simply can't sustain itself in a competitive market space. Unless you can name some major companies today that are institutionally racist? I will grant you royal mail though as it's recently privitised. They have been numerous studies into the school system.The police force and other services.That goes beyond individuals and has become culture.Its a thing. Denying it only makes it worse and benefits no one.

No i accept it can happen in non-competitive organisations like the police. But it is illegal and against the explicit job descriptions of private companies so I'd love some examples of private sector companies that are institutionally racists and not operating in a monopoly or oligopoly? Radio 5 did an interesting experiment .

CVs from six fictitious candidates - who were given traditionally white, black African or Muslim names - were sent to 50 firms by Radio Five Live.

White "candidates" were far more likely to be given an interview than similarly qualified black or Asian "names"

The employers targeted by the undercover survey were selected at random from newspaper adverts and recruitment websites.

All the applicants were given the same standard of qualifications and experience, but their CVs were presented differently.

Almost a quarter of applications by two candidates given traditionally "white" names - Jenny Hughes and John Andrews - resulted in interview offers.

But only 9% of the "Muslim" applications, by the fictitious Fatima Khan and Nasser Hanif, prompted a similar response.

Letters from the "black" candidates, Abu Olasemi and Yinka Olatunde, had a 13% success rate."

I'd you'd like to discuss the flaws in that as evidence we can do so in PM or on another thread as i feel we're hijacking this one. But just to be clear, I'm not actually going to get any names of any instutionally racist private sector companies not in a monopoly or oligopoly am i?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just out of interest, do mixed race children get half the racism or the benefits of both races? Just want to know what my kids have in store... Silly questions

No it just shows the flaws in the racist conspiracy theories racist conspiracy theories ..ok just cuz you hear something outrageous doesn't mean it's not true ....to truly gain control of the n**ger you must not beat the n**ger but you must go after the n**ger woman for she is the one who will be the mother you must tie her two hands to a stake and her 2 feet to 2 horses and then let the horses stretch her not too much to damage the merchandise but enough to break her for when she have kids her Maternal instincts will be to teach the n**ger to obay his master ....that was written by a European ..ever wondered where the term lynching came from ..same guy black history is my history it what we learn I

Institutional racism is a real problem and well docomented from infant school to the work place in our society. Im not sure how that absolves you from being racist by living in a institutionally racist society.Anyway i think you have a point.It just wasn't articulated well..

Which institutions in this country are racist? Just your top 3 pleaseGoogle has all the answers you need.There are enough studies on the school system failing afro cartibean boys from kindergarten onwards to keep you reading for a year .The police force has numerous reports on it.The fire service also .

That's interesting because the only place that institutional racism could sustainably last would be either in government or a monopoly, perhaps oligopoly. And then there are people that want to bring more things under state control (shudder)Thanks for agreeing with me.I listed 3 services run by the state.Of course it also exists outside of the state.

Not really and not on any kind of scale. If you're saying institutional racism then that's more than just a bad manager or bad team. That simply can't sustain itself in a competitive market space. Unless you can name some major companies today that are institutionally racist? I will grant you royal mail though as it's recently privitised. They have been numerous studies into the school system.The police force and other services.That goes beyond individuals and has become culture.Its a thing. Denying it only makes it worse and benefits no one.

No i accept it can happen in non-competitive organisations like the police. But it is illegal and against the explicit job descriptions of private companies so I'd love some examples of private sector companies that are institutionally racists and not operating in a monopoly or oligopoly? Radio 5 did an interesting experiment .

CVs from six fictitious candidates - who were given traditionally white, black African or Muslim names - were sent to 50 firms by Radio Five Live.

White "candidates" were far more likely to be given an interview than similarly qualified black or Asian "names"

The employers targeted by the undercover survey were selected at random from newspaper adverts and recruitment websites.

All the applicants were given the same standard of qualifications and experience, but their CVs were presented differently.

Almost a quarter of applications by two candidates given traditionally "white" names - Jenny Hughes and John Andrews - resulted in interview offers.

But only 9% of the "Muslim" applications, by the fictitious Fatima Khan and Nasser Hanif, prompted a similar response.

Letters from the "black" candidates, Abu Olasemi and Yinka Olatunde, had a 13% success rate.

I'd you'd like to discuss the flaws in that as evidence we can do so in PM or on another thread as i feel we're hijacking this one. But just to be clear, I'm not actually going to get any names of any instutionally racist private sector companies not in a monopoly or oligopoly am i? "

Do think any business has a policy of institutional racism. .. I could post studies all day long but that wouldn't achieve anything. I know what you're going to say with regard to the 50 companies those applications went to.Its was some bigot in HR filtering without consent of the bosses.. I 0nly debate in public so lets leave it as its been hijacked by me and im not getting much work done..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


""If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty. "

Sorry !

This type of speech is a bit disturbing to me !

words comes to mind ....like GESTAPO , KGB, Stasi !

Not saying you support those , but unfortunately , my life experience has taught me the hard way that trusting the police and government can be very dangerous!

"the police and government are a important to law and order."

Maybe , but I don't trust or need them to set my moral compass ,or deal with everyday trivialities that might have to do with "hate speech" !

Besides ... they have a lot on their plate as it stands , and better things to do !

If we trivilise the types of crimes being commited we might as well say that anyone can get away with anything.

Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy.

What I say is to help prevent crimes, I do not want to see chaos or disorder on the streets and I bet many people do not want to see it either.

Threats to the UK come from all quarters, people need to inform if they see something wrong, there should be no exceptions.

The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology.

It not wrong to tell the police if a crime has been commited.

For people who stay law abiding it is not hard to stay within the law. I am talking about those who think they are above the law, who think they can get away with anything, you know the criminals who think they can do or say anything because they think they are immune from prosecution.

I say it again, we need to report it and inform to the police about these criminal types as a deterrent, that the behaviours are contrary to our great society and they will not be tolerated.

So support law enforcement and report any criminal activity.

The problem with your premise is you keep referring to crimes!

And that is misleading !

If you are referring to robbery, murder, r*pe, k*dnapping , extortion, yes there is no doubt those are crimes ,and if you witnessed , or have info , you should report it !

Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime !

"Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy."

I don't think if George Orwell was alive he would agree with you ! An neither do I!

Britain is the country with the highest number of "security" surveillance camera system in the world ! All in the name of our "safety"

So how mature is a democracy that doesn't trust its citizens and feels the need to film and record them 24/7 ?

"The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology."

You mean like..... more cameras and drones with cameras to supplement the choppers perving into our backyards?

And more officers to sit around watching those cameras ?

Oh wait... perhaps a police camera in every home !

I think not !

So lets keep a cool head and not confuse

things !

Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law.

People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so.

Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime.

When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime.

Yes as a responsible democracy would use alternative means to out criminal behaviour.

Therefore, we must as responsible people ensure that we are doing our bit, by reporting crimes.

I do not simply buy into this selective crime angle. We are all subject to the same laws in the UK, no exception. If anyone was subject to malicious and hateful mistreatment at the hands of another, I would report that person post haste.

Therefore, I think the government trusts us to make decisions, we vote on matters which affect us hence we are a democracy.

I think the main myth and exaggeration is that the UK police want cameras everywhere. They want to protect the public but they are subject to the law also.

But again we should be reporting crimes no matter what, it is our responsibility, we must assist the police in stopping crime. If we want to ensure that democracy and rule of law are safe we must take responsibility and report and inform.

So support our law enforcement, and ensure we are doing our bit in helping stopping and preventing crime."

You insist on manipulating language and thus distort the narrative !

"Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law."

BS !

"not all crimes are crimes" ?

Did I say that ? ... No you do !

I said, and stand by it :

"Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime ! "

The BS and contradiction in your statement, and your lack of knowledge on the subject is actually confirmed by you when you sate :

"People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so."

Speak for yourself ! How do you know what my qualifications are to make that statement ?

" Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime."

Countries with less , or no cameras fight crime , and have lower crime rates then the UK !

"When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime."

That is already being done !

Its called "profiling"

But that is where technical police work hits a wall !

You see , as soon as the "troublespots" are identified , the data colides with other PC and discrimination barriers , that turns the "profiling" into "racial" or "ethnic" "profiling" and that is the end of it ! Police are thus limited from acting !

An example of this seems to have been the case with the Manchester bomber !

You put way too much trust in government and the law !

Did you see "Yes Minister" a satire or government reality !

The law stipulates what is legal , not right , or just !

The term "justice" does not necessarily equate to legality !

Simple example :

Two criminals can commit the same crime , but one gets off free and the other is convicted , lets say by the same judge.

The difference is one has a better lawyer!

Is that legal ? Yes !

Is it right or just ? NO !

Government traditionally abuses its own power, applying the "rule of law" depending on circumstances and convenience be that what it may !

So I say again , lets not confuse things, or use words to make blanket statements or simple acts into "criminal" acts !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


""If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty. "

Sorry !

This type of speech is a bit disturbing to me !

words comes to mind ....like GESTAPO , KGB, Stasi !

Not saying you support those , but unfortunately , my life experience has taught me the hard way that trusting the police and government can be very dangerous!

"the police and government are a important to law and order."

Maybe , but I don't trust or need them to set my moral compass ,or deal with everyday trivialities that might have to do with "hate speech" !

Besides ... they have a lot on their plate as it stands , and better things to do !

If we trivilise the types of crimes being commited we might as well say that anyone can get away with anything.

Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy.

What I say is to help prevent crimes, I do not want to see chaos or disorder on the streets and I bet many people do not want to see it either.

Threats to the UK come from all quarters, people need to inform if they see something wrong, there should be no exceptions.

The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology.

It not wrong to tell the police if a crime has been commited.

For people who stay law abiding it is not hard to stay within the law. I am talking about those who think they are above the law, who think they can get away with anything, you know the criminals who think they can do or say anything because they think they are immune from prosecution.

I say it again, we need to report it and inform to the police about these criminal types as a deterrent, that the behaviours are contrary to our great society and they will not be tolerated.

So support law enforcement and report any criminal activity.

The problem with your premise is you keep referring to crimes!

And that is misleading !

If you are referring to robbery, murder, r*pe, k*dnapping , extortion, yes there is no doubt those are crimes ,and if you witnessed , or have info , you should report it !

Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime !

"Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy."

I don't think if George Orwell was alive he would agree with you ! An neither do I!

Britain is the country with the highest number of "security" surveillance camera system in the world ! All in the name of our "safety"

So how mature is a democracy that doesn't trust its citizens and feels the need to film and record them 24/7 ?

"The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology."

You mean like..... more cameras and drones with cameras to supplement the choppers perving into our backyards?

And more officers to sit around watching those cameras ?

Oh wait... perhaps a police camera in every home !

I think not !

So lets keep a cool head and not confuse

things !

Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law.

People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so.

Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime.

When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime.

Yes as a responsible democracy would use alternative means to out criminal behaviour.

Therefore, we must as responsible people ensure that we are doing our bit, by reporting crimes.

I do not simply buy into this selective crime angle. We are all subject to the same laws in the UK, no exception. If anyone was subject to malicious and hateful mistreatment at the hands of another, I would report that person post haste.

Therefore, I think the government trusts us to make decisions, we vote on matters which affect us hence we are a democracy.

I think the main myth and exaggeration is that the UK police want cameras everywhere. They want to protect the public but they are subject to the law also.

But again we should be reporting crimes no matter what, it is our responsibility, we must assist the police in stopping crime. If we want to ensure that democracy and rule of law are safe we must take responsibility and report and inform.

So support our law enforcement, and ensure we are doing our bit in helping stopping and preventing crime.

You insist on manipulating language and thus distort the narrative !

"Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law."

BS !

"not all crimes are crimes" ?

Did I say that ? ... No you do !

I said, and stand by it :

"Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime ! "

The BS and contradiction in your statement, and your lack of knowledge on the subject is actually confirmed by you when you sate :

"People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so."

Speak for yourself ! How do you know what my qualifications are to make that statement ?

" Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime."

Countries with less , or no cameras fight crime , and have lower crime rates then the UK !

"When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime."

That is already being done !

Its called "profiling"

But that is where technical police work hits a wall !

You see , as soon as the "troublespots" are identified , the data colides with other PC and discrimination barriers , that turns the "profiling" into "racial" or "ethnic" "profiling" and that is the end of it ! Police are thus limited from acting !

An example of this seems to have been the case with the Manchester bomber !

You put way too much trust in government and the law !

Did you see "Yes Minister" a satire or government reality !

The law stipulates what is legal , not right , or just !

The term "justice" does not necessarily equate to legality !

Simple example :

Two criminals can commit the same crime , but one gets off free and the other is convicted , lets say by the same judge.

The difference is one has a better lawyer!

Is that legal ? Yes !

Is it right or just ? NO !

Government traditionally abuses its own power, applying the "rule of law" depending on circumstances and convenience be that what it may !

So I say again , lets not confuse things, or use words to make blanket statements or simple acts into "criminal" acts ! "

No need to get abusive, lets keep it civil please.

I was talking from a legal perspective, i only assumed you were not a legal professional, do not take it personally. My mistake was in assuming only.

I only want to ensure that people are not intimidated in reporting crime, we need to support our law enforcement people in the UK.

Because many crimes are under reported, it makes it difficult to put the right resources in.

I do not think the UK is corrupt nation, the UK is awesome.

We need to keep it that way.

there is no conspiracy, facts speak for themselves, it is not profiling if the statistics are accurate. Anyone can obtain that information you can even check the stats on the police.uk website.

So again I reiterate, people should know where to report crimes to and should not be intimidated by anyone in not doing so, ensuring a safer society, and helping fight crime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


""If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty. "

Sorry !

This type of speech is a bit disturbing to me !

words comes to mind ....like GESTAPO , KGB, Stasi !

Not saying you support those , but unfortunately , my life experience has taught me the hard way that trusting the police and government can be very dangerous!

"the police and government are a important to law and order."

Maybe , but I don't trust or need them to set my moral compass ,or deal with everyday trivialities that might have to do with "hate speech" !

Besides ... they have a lot on their plate as it stands , and better things to do !

If we trivilise the types of crimes being commited we might as well say that anyone can get away with anything.

Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy.

What I say is to help prevent crimes, I do not want to see chaos or disorder on the streets and I bet many people do not want to see it either.

Threats to the UK come from all quarters, people need to inform if they see something wrong, there should be no exceptions.

The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology.

It not wrong to tell the police if a crime has been commited.

For people who stay law abiding it is not hard to stay within the law. I am talking about those who think they are above the law, who think they can get away with anything, you know the criminals who think they can do or say anything because they think they are immune from prosecution.

I say it again, we need to report it and inform to the police about these criminal types as a deterrent, that the behaviours are contrary to our great society and they will not be tolerated.

So support law enforcement and report any criminal activity.

The problem with your premise is you keep referring to crimes!

And that is misleading !

If you are referring to robbery, murder, r*pe, k*dnapping , extortion, yes there is no doubt those are crimes ,and if you witnessed , or have info , you should report it !

Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime !

"Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy."

I don't think if George Orwell was alive he would agree with you ! An neither do I!

Britain is the country with the highest number of "security" surveillance camera system in the world ! All in the name of our "safety"

So how mature is a democracy that doesn't trust its citizens and feels the need to film and record them 24/7 ?

"The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology."

You mean like..... more cameras and drones with cameras to supplement the choppers perving into our backyards?

And more officers to sit around watching those cameras ?

Oh wait... perhaps a police camera in every home !

I think not !

So lets keep a cool head and not confuse

things !

Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law.

People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so.

Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime.

When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime.

Yes as a responsible democracy would use alternative means to out criminal behaviour.

Therefore, we must as responsible people ensure that we are doing our bit, by reporting crimes.

I do not simply buy into this selective crime angle. We are all subject to the same laws in the UK, no exception. If anyone was subject to malicious and hateful mistreatment at the hands of another, I would report that person post haste.

Therefore, I think the government trusts us to make decisions, we vote on matters which affect us hence we are a democracy.

I think the main myth and exaggeration is that the UK police want cameras everywhere. They want to protect the public but they are subject to the law also.

But again we should be reporting crimes no matter what, it is our responsibility, we must assist the police in stopping crime. If we want to ensure that democracy and rule of law are safe we must take responsibility and report and inform.

So support our law enforcement, and ensure we are doing our bit in helping stopping and preventing crime.

You insist on manipulating language and thus distort the narrative !

"Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law."

BS !

"not all crimes are crimes" ?

Did I say that ? ... No you do !

I said, and stand by it :

"Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime ! "

The BS and contradiction in your statement, and your lack of knowledge on the subject is actually confirmed by you when you sate :

"People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so."

Speak for yourself ! How do you know what my qualifications are to make that statement ?

" Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime."

Countries with less , or no cameras fight crime , and have lower crime rates then the UK !

"When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime."

That is already being done !

Its called "profiling"

But that is where technical police work hits a wall !

You see , as soon as the "troublespots" are identified , the data colides with other PC and discrimination barriers , that turns the "profiling" into "racial" or "ethnic" "profiling" and that is the end of it ! Police are thus limited from acting !

An example of this seems to have been the case with the Manchester bomber !

You put way too much trust in government and the law !

Did you see "Yes Minister" a satire or government reality !

The law stipulates what is legal , not right , or just !

The term "justice" does not necessarily equate to legality !

Simple example :

Two criminals can commit the same crime , but one gets off free and the other is convicted , lets say by the same judge.

The difference is one has a better lawyer!

Is that legal ? Yes !

Is it right or just ? NO !

Government traditionally abuses its own power, applying the "rule of law" depending on circumstances and convenience be that what it may !

So I say again , lets not confuse things, or use words to make blanket statements or simple acts into "criminal" acts !

No need to get abusive, lets keep it civil please.

I was talking from a legal perspective, i only assumed you were not a legal professional, do not take it personally. My mistake was in assuming only.

I only want to ensure that people are not intimidated in reporting crime, we need to support our law enforcement people in the UK.

Because many crimes are under reported, it makes it difficult to put the right resources in.

I do not think the UK is corrupt nation, the UK is awesome.

We need to keep it that way.

there is no conspiracy, facts speak for themselves, it is not profiling if the statistics are accurate. Anyone can obtain that information you can even check the stats on the police.uk website.

So again I reiterate, people should know where to report crimes to and should not be intimidated by anyone in not doing so, ensuring a safer society, and helping fight crime.

"

My apology for only replying now! i was on a 24 holiday from from the forums!

Didn't mean to be abusive !

You mention the legal perspective, but in fact ,from that perspective one can be overzealous , but an occurrence can still not be classified as criminal !

Often people and even the authorities confuse wrong doing with crime ! There are rules , and there are laws ! breaking either might be a minor offence that is not classified as a crime !

This is why I said you bundle all up as crimes ... and it might not be the case !

I agree all should cooperate e with the authorities , and people should report crimes , but this can be taken too far !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


""If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty. "

Sorry !

This type of speech is a bit disturbing to me !

words comes to mind ....like GESTAPO , KGB, Stasi !

Not saying you support those , but unfortunately , my life experience has taught me the hard way that trusting the police and government can be very dangerous!

"the police and government are a important to law and order."

Maybe , but I don't trust or need them to set my moral compass ,or deal with everyday trivialities that might have to do with "hate speech" !

Besides ... they have a lot on their plate as it stands , and better things to do !

If we trivilise the types of crimes being commited we might as well say that anyone can get away with anything.

Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy.

What I say is to help prevent crimes, I do not want to see chaos or disorder on the streets and I bet many people do not want to see it either.

Threats to the UK come from all quarters, people need to inform if they see something wrong, there should be no exceptions.

The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology.

It not wrong to tell the police if a crime has been commited.

For people who stay law abiding it is not hard to stay within the law. I am talking about those who think they are above the law, who think they can get away with anything, you know the criminals who think they can do or say anything because they think they are immune from prosecution.

I say it again, we need to report it and inform to the police about these criminal types as a deterrent, that the behaviours are contrary to our great society and they will not be tolerated.

So support law enforcement and report any criminal activity.

The problem with your premise is you keep referring to crimes!

And that is misleading !

If you are referring to robbery, murder, r*pe, k*dnapping , extortion, yes there is no doubt those are crimes ,and if you witnessed , or have info , you should report it !

Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime !

"Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy."

I don't think if George Orwell was alive he would agree with you ! An neither do I!

Britain is the country with the highest number of "security" surveillance camera system in the world ! All in the name of our "safety"

So how mature is a democracy that doesn't trust its citizens and feels the need to film and record them 24/7 ?

"The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology."

You mean like..... more cameras and drones with cameras to supplement the choppers perving into our backyards?

And more officers to sit around watching those cameras ?

Oh wait... perhaps a police camera in every home !

I think not !

So lets keep a cool head and not confuse

things !

Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law.

People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so.

Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime.

When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime.

Yes as a responsible democracy would use alternative means to out criminal behaviour.

Therefore, we must as responsible people ensure that we are doing our bit, by reporting crimes.

I do not simply buy into this selective crime angle. We are all subject to the same laws in the UK, no exception. If anyone was subject to malicious and hateful mistreatment at the hands of another, I would report that person post haste.

Therefore, I think the government trusts us to make decisions, we vote on matters which affect us hence we are a democracy.

I think the main myth and exaggeration is that the UK police want cameras everywhere. They want to protect the public but they are subject to the law also.

But again we should be reporting crimes no matter what, it is our responsibility, we must assist the police in stopping crime. If we want to ensure that democracy and rule of law are safe we must take responsibility and report and inform.

So support our law enforcement, and ensure we are doing our bit in helping stopping and preventing crime.

You insist on manipulating language and thus distort the narrative !

"Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law."

BS !

"not all crimes are crimes" ?

Did I say that ? ... No you do !

I said, and stand by it :

"Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime ! "

The BS and contradiction in your statement, and your lack of knowledge on the subject is actually confirmed by you when you sate :

"People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so."

Speak for yourself ! How do you know what my qualifications are to make that statement ?

" Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime."

Countries with less , or no cameras fight crime , and have lower crime rates then the UK !

"When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime."

That is already being done !

Its called "profiling"

But that is where technical police work hits a wall !

You see , as soon as the "troublespots" are identified , the data colides with other PC and discrimination barriers , that turns the "profiling" into "racial" or "ethnic" "profiling" and that is the end of it ! Police are thus limited from acting !

An example of this seems to have been the case with the Manchester bomber !

You put way too much trust in government and the law !

Did you see "Yes Minister" a satire or government reality !

The law stipulates what is legal , not right , or just !

The term "justice" does not necessarily equate to legality !

Simple example :

Two criminals can commit the same crime , but one gets off free and the other is convicted , lets say by the same judge.

The difference is one has a better lawyer!

Is that legal ? Yes !

Is it right or just ? NO !

Government traditionally abuses its own power, applying the "rule of law" depending on circumstances and convenience be that what it may !

So I say again , lets not confuse things, or use words to make blanket statements or simple acts into "criminal" acts !

No need to get abusive, lets keep it civil please.

I was talking from a legal perspective, i only assumed you were not a legal professional, do not take it personally. My mistake was in assuming only.

I only want to ensure that people are not intimidated in reporting crime, we need to support our law enforcement people in the UK.

Because many crimes are under reported, it makes it difficult to put the right resources in.

I do not think the UK is corrupt nation, the UK is awesome.

We need to keep it that way.

there is no conspiracy, facts speak for themselves, it is not profiling if the statistics are accurate. Anyone can obtain that information you can even check the stats on the police.uk website.

So again I reiterate, people should know where to report crimes to and should not be intimidated by anyone in not doing so, ensuring a safer society, and helping fight crime.

My apology for only replying now! i was on a 24 holiday from from the forums!

Didn't mean to be abusive !

You mention the legal perspective, but in fact ,from that perspective one can be overzealous , but an occurrence can still not be classified as criminal !

Often people and even the authorities confuse wrong doing with crime ! There are rules , and there are laws ! breaking either might be a minor offence that is not classified as a crime !

This is why I said you bundle all up as crimes ... and it might not be the case !

I agree all should cooperate e with the authorities , and people should report crimes , but this can be taken too far !

"

Finally! we agree, we should be reporting crimes and we should co operate with authorities! hooray!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


""If we report, we are essentially doing our duty as citizens, the police and government are a important to law and order. So we must ensure that we are doing our duty. "

Sorry !

This type of speech is a bit disturbing to me !

words comes to mind ....like GESTAPO , KGB, Stasi !

Not saying you support those , but unfortunately , my life experience has taught me the hard way that trusting the police and government can be very dangerous!

"the police and government are a important to law and order."

Maybe , but I don't trust or need them to set my moral compass ,or deal with everyday trivialities that might have to do with "hate speech" !

Besides ... they have a lot on their plate as it stands , and better things to do !

If we trivilise the types of crimes being commited we might as well say that anyone can get away with anything.

Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy.

What I say is to help prevent crimes, I do not want to see chaos or disorder on the streets and I bet many people do not want to see it either.

Threats to the UK come from all quarters, people need to inform if they see something wrong, there should be no exceptions.

The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology.

It not wrong to tell the police if a crime has been commited.

For people who stay law abiding it is not hard to stay within the law. I am talking about those who think they are above the law, who think they can get away with anything, you know the criminals who think they can do or say anything because they think they are immune from prosecution.

I say it again, we need to report it and inform to the police about these criminal types as a deterrent, that the behaviours are contrary to our great society and they will not be tolerated.

So support law enforcement and report any criminal activity.

The problem with your premise is you keep referring to crimes!

And that is misleading !

If you are referring to robbery, murder, r*pe, k*dnapping , extortion, yes there is no doubt those are crimes ,and if you witnessed , or have info , you should report it !

Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime !

"Our democracy provides the balance, I would never say that the UK government are akin to a police state, it never will be because our democracy is a mature and stable democracy."

I don't think if George Orwell was alive he would agree with you ! An neither do I!

Britain is the country with the highest number of "security" surveillance camera system in the world ! All in the name of our "safety"

So how mature is a democracy that doesn't trust its citizens and feels the need to film and record them 24/7 ?

"The police would have less problems if we provided more money to them to recruit officers and staff and invest in technology."

You mean like..... more cameras and drones with cameras to supplement the choppers perving into our backyards?

And more officers to sit around watching those cameras ?

Oh wait... perhaps a police camera in every home !

I think not !

So lets keep a cool head and not confuse

things !

Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law.

People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so.

Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime.

When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime.

Yes as a responsible democracy would use alternative means to out criminal behaviour.

Therefore, we must as responsible people ensure that we are doing our bit, by reporting crimes.

I do not simply buy into this selective crime angle. We are all subject to the same laws in the UK, no exception. If anyone was subject to malicious and hateful mistreatment at the hands of another, I would report that person post haste.

Therefore, I think the government trusts us to make decisions, we vote on matters which affect us hence we are a democracy.

I think the main myth and exaggeration is that the UK police want cameras everywhere. They want to protect the public but they are subject to the law also.

But again we should be reporting crimes no matter what, it is our responsibility, we must assist the police in stopping crime. If we want to ensure that democracy and rule of law are safe we must take responsibility and report and inform.

So support our law enforcement, and ensure we are doing our bit in helping stopping and preventing crime.

You insist on manipulating language and thus distort the narrative !

"Not all crimes are crimes? I wonder if many criminals think like that also. Again no one is above the law."

BS !

"not all crimes are crimes" ?

Did I say that ? ... No you do !

I said, and stand by it :

"Hate speech or the less pleasant human interactions and altercations are not all "crimes" per se !

Even some fights or type of aggression between individuals might not fall into the definition of crime ! "

The BS and contradiction in your statement, and your lack of knowledge on the subject is actually confirmed by you when you sate :

"People far more qualified than us made those decisions, on what is a crime and what isn't , I would trust them more on knowing the facts about it. Besides just because some people do not think it is a crime does not make it so."

Speak for yourself ! How do you know what my qualifications are to make that statement ?

" Cameras, Surveillance used responsibly has helped in many ways to fight crime."

Countries with less , or no cameras fight crime , and have lower crime rates then the UK !

"When I mean technology I mean using statistical data to identify potencial troublespots which then with a larger police force can tackle crime."

That is already being done !

Its called "profiling"

But that is where technical police work hits a wall !

You see , as soon as the "troublespots" are identified , the data colides with other PC and discrimination barriers , that turns the "profiling" into "racial" or "ethnic" "profiling" and that is the end of it ! Police are thus limited from acting !

An example of this seems to have been the case with the Manchester bomber !

You put way too much trust in government and the law !

Did you see "Yes Minister" a satire or government reality !

The law stipulates what is legal , not right , or just !

The term "justice" does not necessarily equate to legality !

Simple example :

Two criminals can commit the same crime , but one gets off free and the other is convicted , lets say by the same judge.

The difference is one has a better lawyer!

Is that legal ? Yes !

Is it right or just ? NO !

Government traditionally abuses its own power, applying the "rule of law" depending on circumstances and convenience be that what it may !

So I say again , lets not confuse things, or use words to make blanket statements or simple acts into "criminal" acts !

No need to get abusive, lets keep it civil please.

I was talking from a legal perspective, i only assumed you were not a legal professional, do not take it personally. My mistake was in assuming only.

I only want to ensure that people are not intimidated in reporting crime, we need to support our law enforcement people in the UK.

Because many crimes are under reported, it makes it difficult to put the right resources in.

I do not think the UK is corrupt nation, the UK is awesome.

We need to keep it that way.

there is no conspiracy, facts speak for themselves, it is not profiling if the statistics are accurate. Anyone can obtain that information you can even check the stats on the police.uk website.

So again I reiterate, people should know where to report crimes to and should not be intimidated by anyone in not doing so, ensuring a safer society, and helping fight crime.

My apology for only replying now! i was on a 24 holiday from from the forums!

Didn't mean to be abusive !

You mention the legal perspective, but in fact ,from that perspective one can be overzealous , but an occurrence can still not be classified as criminal !

Often people and even the authorities confuse wrong doing with crime ! There are rules , and there are laws ! breaking either might be a minor offence that is not classified as a crime !

This is why I said you bundle all up as crimes ... and it might not be the case !

I agree all should cooperate e with the authorities , and people should report crimes , but this can be taken too far !

Finally! we agree, we should be reporting crimes and we should co operate with authorities! hooray! "

Why are you surprised ? I never said I was against that, did I ?

I was only cautioning against your blanket notion of "crime" and apparent excess zeal on reporting everything !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We should profile white bankers biggest fucking thieves ever.Drag net canary wharf.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple
over a year ago

Basingstoke

Snitches get stiches

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"Snitches get stiches"

Or worse......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top