Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Nothing wrong with JC, it's the rest of his party that's the problem. " I have a few big issues with JC but generally enough to overlook considering the other parties in a position to form a government. Hopefully the party can pull behind him for this and push the stuff they all generally agree on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Nothing wrong with JC, it's the rest of his party that's the problem. I have a few big issues with JC but generally enough to overlook considering the other parties in a position to form a government. Hopefully the party can pull behind him for this and push the stuff they all generally agree on." My worry is we'd be voting in a very weak government. The economic impact could be massive. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Nothing wrong with JC, it's the rest of his party that's the problem. I have a few big issues with JC but generally enough to overlook considering the other parties in a position to form a government. Hopefully the party can pull behind him for this and push the stuff they all generally agree on. My worry is we'd be voting in a very weak government. The economic impact could be massive. " Indeed. Only the Torys are strong enough to REALLY actively wreck our society and enrich those at the top. JC is just too weak to do so. -Matt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Nothing wrong with JC, it's the rest of his party that's the problem. I have a few big issues with JC but generally enough to overlook considering the other parties in a position to form a government. Hopefully the party can pull behind him for this and push the stuff they all generally agree on. My worry is we'd be voting in a very weak government. The economic impact could be massive. Indeed. Only the Torys are strong enough to REALLY actively wreck our society and enrich those at the top. JC is just too weak to do so. -Matt" Hahaha, tbh at this point with brexit and a big amount of the population on a debt bubble, the economy will suffer regardless for a while. Question is do you want to try and cut the debt/grow the economy through investment or austerity. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Nothing wrong with JC, it's the rest of his party that's the problem. I have a few big issues with JC but generally enough to overlook considering the other parties in a position to form a government. Hopefully the party can pull behind him for this and push the stuff they all generally agree on. My worry is we'd be voting in a very weak government. The economic impact could be massive. Indeed. Only the Torys are strong enough to REALLY actively wreck our society and enrich those at the top. JC is just too weak to do so. -Matt Hahaha, tbh at this point with brexit and a big amount of the population on a debt bubble, the economy will suffer regardless for a while. Question is do you want to try and cut the debt/grow the economy through investment or austerity." Government borrowing rates are at their lowest in a long time. The govt should use that fact to invest in infrastructure and society and not continue down the austerity route. -Matt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Nothing wrong with JC, it's the rest of his party that's the problem. I have a few big issues with JC but generally enough to overlook considering the other parties in a position to form a government. Hopefully the party can pull behind him for this and push the stuff they all generally agree on. My worry is we'd be voting in a very weak government. The economic impact could be massive. Indeed. Only the Torys are strong enough to REALLY actively wreck our society and enrich those at the top. JC is just too weak to do so. -Matt Hahaha, tbh at this point with brexit and a big amount of the population on a debt bubble, the economy will suffer regardless for a while. Question is do you want to try and cut the debt/grow the economy through investment or austerity. Government borrowing rates are at their lowest in a long time. The govt should use that fact to invest in infrastructure and society and not continue down the austerity route. -Matt" Or phrased slightly differently: how had the current government managed to increase the debt so massively yet still cut services so much under the guise of austerity? -Matt | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Nothing wrong with JC, it's the rest of his party that's the problem. I have a few big issues with JC but generally enough to overlook considering the other parties in a position to form a government. Hopefully the party can pull behind him for this and push the stuff they all generally agree on. My worry is we'd be voting in a very weak government. The economic impact could be massive. Indeed. Only the Torys are strong enough to REALLY actively wreck our society and enrich those at the top. JC is just too weak to do so. -Matt Hahaha, tbh at this point with brexit and a big amount of the population on a debt bubble, the economy will suffer regardless for a while. Question is do you want to try and cut the debt/grow the economy through investment or austerity. Government borrowing rates are at their lowest in a long time. The govt should use that fact to invest in infrastructure and society and not continue down the austerity route. -Matt Or phrased slightly differently: how had the current government managed to increase the debt so massively yet still cut services so much under the guise of austerity? -Matt"  Must be labours fault or the EU | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Nothing wrong with JC, it's the rest of his party that's the problem. I have a few big issues with JC but generally enough to overlook considering the other parties in a position to form a government. Hopefully the party can pull behind him for this and push the stuff they all generally agree on. My worry is we'd be voting in a very weak government. The economic impact could be massive. Indeed. Only the Torys are strong enough to REALLY actively wreck our society and enrich those at the top. JC is just too weak to do so. -Matt" I feel that Labour would discourage international investment in the UK. Not necessarily because it's Labour, just that its weak. A coalition would be worse. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Nothing wrong with JC, it's the rest of his party that's the problem. I have a few big issues with JC but generally enough to overlook considering the other parties in a position to form a government. Hopefully the party can pull behind him for this and push the stuff they all generally agree on. My worry is we'd be voting in a very weak government. The economic impact could be massive. Indeed. Only the Torys are strong enough to REALLY actively wreck our society and enrich those at the top. JC is just too weak to do so. -Matt I feel that Labour would discourage international investment in the UK. Not necessarily because it's Labour, just that its weak. A coalition would be worse. " What makes you feel that though? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Nothing wrong with JC, it's the rest of his party that's the problem. I have a few big issues with JC but generally enough to overlook considering the other parties in a position to form a government. Hopefully the party can pull behind him for this and push the stuff they all generally agree on. My worry is we'd be voting in a very weak government. The economic impact could be massive. Indeed. Only the Torys are strong enough to REALLY actively wreck our society and enrich those at the top. JC is just too weak to do so. -Matt I feel that Labour would discourage international investment in the UK. Not necessarily because it's Labour, just that its weak. A coalition would be worse. What makes you feel that though?" Tax | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
If you start hammering the well offs on the tax front people will simply either find ways around it or will just downsize and not employ as many and will just turn over enough for them thus putting nothing back into the economy.
some people work hard take risks with thier own money to get some where so then you want to take it away from them again?
there go all of the risk takers  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Jeremy CLARKSON would do a much better job than Corbyn...even his diplomacy is better received "He would probably get more votes  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So many say JC would make a poor PM because he is too left wing or has only loony policies, here is what he intends to do if Labour gain power: 1. Return to a fully nationalised and well funded NHS. The big hint in how the National Health Service should be run is in the last word there, it is not the NHB(usiness) and none of it should be run by private companies for profit! 2. Affordable homes fit for human habitation for all. 3. Peace not war. 4. A £10 pound an hour minimum wage. 5. Free university tuition. 6. A nationalised rail service. Why do we subsidise the profits of rail operators when we can run the railways better ourselves? 7. Well funded social care. 8. A greener more equal economy with investment in renewable energy and a stop to highly risky fracking in the UK. 9. A reversal of the 72 billion pounds worth of tax cuts for the rich (funded by NHS, local authority, police, fire service and social welfare cuts), an end to sweetheart tax deals for multinationals and a clampdown on tax dodging. Now who is against any of the above? And if you are against JC's policies will you explain why? " Where will the money come from for all that lot? Don't say item 9, we can all see through that lie as it would be no where near £72bn and the Tories have already started a clampdown. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So many say JC would make a poor PM because he is too left wing or has only loony policies, here is what he intends to do if Labour gain power: 1. Return to a fully nationalised and well funded NHS. The big hint in how the National Health Service should be run is in the last word there, it is not the NHB(usiness) and none of it should be run by private companies for profit! 2. Affordable homes fit for human habitation for all. 3. Peace not war. 4. A £10 pound an hour minimum wage. 5. Free university tuition. 6. A nationalised rail service. Why do we subsidise the profits of rail operators when we can run the railways better ourselves? 7. Well funded social care. 8. A greener more equal economy with investment in renewable energy and a stop to highly risky fracking in the UK. 9. A reversal of the 72 billion pounds worth of tax cuts for the rich (funded by NHS, local authority, police, fire service and social welfare cuts), an end to sweetheart tax deals for multinationals and a clampdown on tax dodging. Now who is against any of the above? And if you are against JC's policies will you explain why? " Surely you just make this crap up right? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So many say JC would make a poor PM because he is too left wing or has only loony policies, here is what he intends to do if Labour gain power: 1. Return to a fully nationalised and well funded NHS. The big hint in how the National Health Service should be run is in the last word there, it is not the NHB(usiness) and none of it should be run by private companies for profit! 2. Affordable homes fit for human habitation for all. 3. Peace not war. 4. A £10 pound an hour minimum wage. 5. Free university tuition. 6. A nationalised rail service. Why do we subsidise the profits of rail operators when we can run the railways better ourselves? 7. Well funded social care. 8. A greener more equal economy with investment in renewable energy and a stop to highly risky fracking in the UK. 9. A reversal of the 72 billion pounds worth of tax cuts for the rich (funded by NHS, local authority, police, fire service and social welfare cuts), an end to sweetheart tax deals for multinationals and a clampdown on tax dodging. Now who is against any of the above? And if you are against JC's policies will you explain why? Where will the money come from for all that lot? Don't say item 9, we can all see through that lie as it would be no where near £72bn and the Tories have already started a clampdown." I was just about to ask the same thing. Where will the money come from? Listening to shadow chancellor John McDonnell on the news Labours spending plans are in cloud cookoo land with no idea how they intend to pay for it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So many say JC would make a poor PM because he is too left wing or has only loony policies, here is what he intends to do if Labour gain power: 1. Return to a fully nationalised and well funded NHS. The big hint in how the National Health Service should be run is in the last word there, it is not the NHB(usiness) and none of it should be run by private companies for profit! 2. Affordable homes fit for human habitation for all. 3. Peace not war. 4. A £10 pound an hour minimum wage. 5. Free university tuition. 6. A nationalised rail service. Why do we subsidise the profits of rail operators when we can run the railways better ourselves? 7. Well funded social care. 8. A greener more equal economy with investment in renewable energy and a stop to highly risky fracking in the UK. 9. A reversal of the 72 billion pounds worth of tax cuts for the rich (funded by NHS, local authority, police, fire service and social welfare cuts), an end to sweetheart tax deals for multinationals and a clampdown on tax dodging. Now who is against any of the above? And if you are against JC's policies will you explain why? Where will the money come from for all that lot? Don't say item 9, we can all see through that lie as it would be no where near £72bn and the Tories have already started a clampdown. I was just about to ask the same thing. Where will the money come from? Listening to shadow chancellor John McDonnell on the news Labours spending plans are in cloud cookoo land with no idea how they intend to pay for it. " From "the fund". | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd rather have someone who looks a little scruffy representing me, yhan someone who is so bothered about their appearance that they spend hundreds of pounds on leather trousers, and heels which ususlly look not worth the money." If Theresa May wishes to spend her own money in that way it's upto her. It's not taxpayers money she is spending on her own clothes. Jeremy Corbyn's tax return showed he earned around £100,000 last year, it wouldn't do him any harm to spend a bit of it on a new wardrobe. The 1970's Michael Foot look he seems to go for is doing him no favours at all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd rather have someone who looks a little scruffy representing me, yhan someone who is so bothered about their appearance that they spend hundreds of pounds on leather trousers, and heels which ususlly look not worth the money. If Theresa May wishes to spend her own money in that way it's upto her. It's not taxpayers money she is spending on her own clothes. Jeremy Corbyn's tax return showed he earned around £100,000 last year, it wouldn't do him any harm to spend a bit of it on a new wardrobe. The 1970's Michael Foot look he seems to go for is doing him no favours at all. " I don't think he looks too bad.. The beard needs to be trimmed up but he looks clean and shirt n suit too  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Or phrased slightly differently: how had the current government managed to increase the debt so massively yet still cut services so much under the guise of austerity? -Matt" I've already explained the difference between a debt and a deficit on here several times but one again..... The DEBT will continue to rise as long as we have a deficit. We have had a deficit for around 8 years. You have to get rid of the deficit before the debt will stop growing and start shrinking again. The deficit has shrunk under the coalition and the Tories but is still there. It is NOT the fault of the present or last government that debt is growing, no matter how convenient that lie may be to the shadow chancellor. Into the middle of this slow but steady recovery, Labour pledges the moon on a stick.... Easy, just borrow more! NO NO NO, it just prolongs the pain and would be a spectacularly fuckwitted way to do it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The idea here was Corbyn ? I just don't think he is fit to be PM even if his policieces were good !" Imagine if he was vocal like Nicola Sturgeon! Pmqs would be more than interesting | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I really don't think that Corbyn ever intended himself to become PM - He's pushing retirement age. I think his goal was to serve his term as leader, make the Labour Party into a viable left wing opposition and then allow someone younger and more charismatic take the party further. " He is not that clever,but maybe he is achieving what you say | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I really don't think that Corbyn ever intended himself to become PM - He's pushing retirement age. I think his goal was to serve his term as leader, make the Labour Party into a viable left wing opposition and then allow someone younger and more charismatic take the party further. He is not that clever,but maybe he is achieving what you say" What do you base that on? He comes across as being pretty clever if you actually watch him speak as opposed to reading/seeing him second hand.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Even if you support labour , can anyone seriously want Jeremy Corbyn as our Prime Minister ? " On the news stations on television tonight press preview on the front pages of tomorrow's newspapers the polls don't look good for Corbyn and Labour. The Sunday Mirror poll puts the tories on 50% and Labour only half that on 25%. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Even if you support labour , can anyone seriously want Jeremy Corbyn as our Prime Minister ? On the news stations on television tonight press preview on the front pages of tomorrow's newspapers the polls don't look good for Corbyn and Labour. The Sunday Mirror poll puts the tories on 50% and Labour only half that on 25%. " Oddly, the Mail has Tories on 40 and Labour on 29.....who trusts polls these days? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Even if you support labour , can anyone seriously want Jeremy Corbyn as our Prime Minister ? On the news stations on television tonight press preview on the front pages of tomorrow's newspapers the polls don't look good for Corbyn and Labour. The Sunday Mirror poll puts the tories on 50% and Labour only half that on 25%. Oddly, the Mail has Tories on 40 and Labour on 29.....who trusts polls these days?" Tories 40 Labour 29 That still puts the tories 11 points clear of Labour. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Even if you support labour , can anyone seriously want Jeremy Corbyn as our Prime Minister ? On the news stations on television tonight press preview on the front pages of tomorrow's newspapers the polls don't look good for Corbyn and Labour. The Sunday Mirror poll puts the tories on 50% and Labour only half that on 25%. Oddly, the Mail has Tories on 40 and Labour on 29.....who trusts polls these days? Tories 40 Labour 29 That still puts the tories 11 points clear of Labour. " Which is slightly different to 25% points difference.....either way it's not exactly great news for Jezza | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So many say JC would make a poor PM because he is too left wing or has only loony policies, here is what he intends to do if Labour gain power: 1. Return to a fully nationalised and well funded NHS. The big hint in how the National Health Service should be run is in the last word there, it is not the NHB(usiness) and none of it should be run by private companies for profit! 2. Affordable homes fit for human habitation for all. 3. Peace not war. 4. A £10 pound an hour minimum wage. 5. Free university tuition. 6. A nationalised rail service. Why do we subsidise the profits of rail operators when we can run the railways better ourselves? 7. Well funded social care. 8. A greener more equal economy with investment in renewable energy and a stop to highly risky fracking in the UK. 9. A reversal of the 72 billion pounds worth of tax cuts for the rich (funded by NHS, local authority, police, fire service and social welfare cuts), an end to sweetheart tax deals for multinationals and a clampdown on tax dodging. Now who is against any of the above? And if you are against JC's policies will you explain why? Surely you just make this crap up right? "
Let's remember, that £10 at the lower end means those higher up will also want an increase. We need a wage difference as that is what encourages us strife for a better life through work | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
