FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Schrodinger's immigrants

Jump to newest
 

By *isandre OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Durham

Taking all our jobs AND are benefit scroungers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch


"Taking all our jobs AND are benefit scroungers.

"

Shirley you're not suggesting many who voted brexit are oxymorons ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well OP anyone can make any group or demographic look stupid by over simplifying a complecated matter...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There are plenty of jobs, but the brits are too lazy to take them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Taking all our jobs AND are benefit scroungers.

"
Quantum immigrants.Who would of guessed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *odernLoveDublinMan
over a year ago

dublin

So if they dont come do they still take your jobs?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"So if they dont come do they still take your jobs? "

Yes, they are outsourced.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There are plenty of jobs, but the Swedes are too lazy to take them."
.

That's why we need poles

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There are plenty of jobs, but the Swedes are too lazy to take them..

That's why we need poles "
Yes and workers to nhs too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Lol. Awesome post. I hope there is humour even for the Schrodinger's racists on the forum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Lol. Awesome post. I hope there is humour even for the Schrodinger's racists on the forum."

But only as long as you don't open the box.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"There are plenty of jobs, but the Swedes are too lazy to take them..

That's why we need poles "

They can't all work as erotic dancers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The ability to hold two factually contradictory statements as simultaneously true is a real skill - maybe we could market it ? There must be a research opportunity there - a study of how a human can survive without a fully functioning brain?

I heard they were sending all the money home to their families while at the same time having them all over here as well.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

For all of the older folk on here, there is a rumour that Erwin wasn't a big fan of the TV show "Take Your Pick" - he quite liked the Yes/No eliminator but got quite upset when people chose not to Take the Money......

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

eh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments "
No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment. "

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not! "

So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oxychick35Couple
over a year ago

thornaby

If theres plenty of jobs but the Brits r to lazy to take them then why do so many men from the northeast and north west leave there family's to go work in London and travel home once a month

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not! "
Actually it was a great success. .

The experiment was designed to illustrate the flaws of the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics, which states that a particle exists in all states at once until observed.

If the Copenhagen interpretation suggests the radioactive material can have simultaneously decayed and not decayed in the sealed environment, then it follows the cat too is both alive and dead until the box is opened.

Common sense tells us this is not the case, and Schrödinger used this to highlight the limits of the Copenhagen interpretation when applied to practical situations. The cat is actually either dead or alive, whether or not it has been observed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not! Actually it was a great success. .

The experiment was designed to illustrate the flaws of the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics, which states that a particle exists in all states at once until observed.

If the Copenhagen interpretation suggests the radioactive material can have simultaneously decayed and not decayed in the sealed environment, then it follows the cat too is both alive and dead until the box is opened.

Common sense tells us this is not the case, and Schrödinger used this to highlight the limits of the Copenhagen interpretation when applied to practical situations. The cat is actually either dead or alive, whether or not it has been observed."

I could have told you that. It ain't difficult

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!

So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice."

Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *onyxptMan
over a year ago

st neots, living in Albufeira-Algarve-Portugal


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!

So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.

Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written "

mmmm.... why do I find this familiar ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not! Actually it was a great success. .

The experiment was designed to illustrate the flaws of the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics, which states that a particle exists in all states at once until observed.

If the Copenhagen interpretation suggests the radioactive material can have simultaneously decayed and not decayed in the sealed environment, then it follows the cat too is both alive and dead until the box is opened.

Common sense tells us this is not the case, and Schrödinger used this to highlight the limits of the Copenhagen interpretation when applied to practical situations. The cat is actually either dead or alive, whether or not it has been observed.

I could have told you that. It ain't difficult "
really so why the concern for theoretical cats..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not! Actually it was a great success. .

The experiment was designed to illustrate the flaws of the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics, which states that a particle exists in all states at once until observed.

If the Copenhagen interpretation suggests the radioactive material can have simultaneously decayed and not decayed in the sealed environment, then it follows the cat too is both alive and dead until the box is opened.

Common sense tells us this is not the case, and Schrödinger used this to highlight the limits of the Copenhagen interpretation when applied to practical situations. The cat is actually either dead or alive, whether or not it has been observed.

I could have told you that. It ain't difficult really so why the concern for theoretical cats.. "

I could have told you something is either dead or alive. Keep up dear fellow, it's not nuclear science

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!

So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.

Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written "

Where did I say I got a kick out of cats dying? You are the one who was unimpressed that no cats were harmed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!

So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.

Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written

Where did I say I got a kick out of cats dying? You are the one who was unimpressed that no cats were harmed. "

Read my first post comprehension is really a very weak area of yours isn't it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!

So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.

Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written

Where did I say I got a kick out of cats dying? You are the one who was unimpressed that no cats were harmed.

Read my first post comprehension is really a very weak area of yours isn't it "

First post: animals shouldn't be hurt

Response: they weren't hurt

2nd post: not impressed they weren't hurt.

My comprehension is fine, if you meant something different, perhaps you need to brush up on your communication skills.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!

So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.

Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written

Where did I say I got a kick out of cats dying? You are the one who was unimpressed that no cats were harmed.

Read my first post comprehension is really a very weak area of yours isn't it

First post: animals shouldn't be hurt

Response: they weren't hurt

2nd post: not impressed they weren't hurt.

My comprehension is fine, if you meant something different, perhaps you need to brush up on your communication skills. "

Seems like there is a Schrodinger's point in his comments. Funny.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm amazed how many people openly support and condone the inhumane slaughter of animals for medical or scientific experiments No cats were harmed in this thought experiment.

So the experiment is complete bollocks as it is just the theory and not proven. Wow, I'm so impressed....not!

So you're disappointed that no cats were hurt? nice.

Deflecting again! I was disappointed how people,such as you, got a kick out of the thought of a cat dying. Read my original post and try to comprehend what is written

Where did I say I got a kick out of cats dying? You are the one who was unimpressed that no cats were harmed.

Read my first post comprehension is really a very weak area of yours isn't it

First post: animals shouldn't be hurt

Response: they weren't hurt

2nd post: not impressed they weren't hurt.

My comprehension is fine, if you meant something different, perhaps you need to brush up on your communication skills. "

Your comprehension is shite! Show me the exact statement where I say I'm not impressed animals weren't hurt. Don't try and deflect that you got off on the hypethetical prospect of murdering animals to make a political point. Sicko!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top