Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report by the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee (PACAC) said MPs were deeply concerned about the allegations of foreign interference in last year’s Brexit vote. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/12/foreign-states-may-have-interfered-in-brexit-vote-report-says?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard" I wouldn't wipe my arse on the Guardian, talk about bias and bollocks? It makes the Sun look positively high-brow. But if this is true, which way would foreign interference have tried to swing the vote do you think? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report by the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee (PACAC) said MPs were deeply concerned about the allegations of foreign interference in last year’s Brexit vote. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/12/foreign-states-may-have-interfered-in-brexit-vote-report-says?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard I wouldn't wipe my arse on the Guardian, talk about bias and bollocks? It makes the Sun look positively high-brow. But if this is true, which way would foreign interference have tried to swing the vote do you think?" They are just reporting on what the committee has found. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-voting-website-crash-caused-by-foreign-cyber-attack-report-reveals-a3513121.html | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report by the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee (PACAC) said MPs were deeply concerned about the allegations of foreign interference in last year’s Brexit vote. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/12/foreign-states-may-have-interfered-in-brexit-vote-report-says?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard I wouldn't wipe my arse on the Guardian, talk about bias and bollocks? It makes the Sun look positively high-brow. But if this is true, which way would foreign interference have tried to swing the vote do you think? They are just reporting on what the committee has found. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-voting-website-crash-caused-by-foreign-cyber-attack-report-reveals-a3513121.html" So, who would cause this if most of the world wanted the UK to remain and which side would something like this possibly help? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report by the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee (PACAC) said MPs were deeply concerned about the allegations of foreign interference in last year’s Brexit vote. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/12/foreign-states-may-have-interfered-in-brexit-vote-report-says?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard I wouldn't wipe my arse on the Guardian, talk about bias and bollocks? It makes the Sun look positively high-brow. But if this is true, which way would foreign interference have tried to swing the vote do you think? They are just reporting on what the committee has found. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-voting-website-crash-caused-by-foreign-cyber-attack-report-reveals-a3513121.html So, who would cause this if most of the world wanted the UK to remain and which side would something like this possibly help?" A side that wants to see division in Europe a weakened uk and eu if Europe is busy with infighting some other large country could take advantage of the weakenEU currency and weekend co operation....hmmm can you think of such a country? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report by the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee (PACAC) said MPs were deeply concerned about the allegations of foreign interference in last year’s Brexit vote. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/12/foreign-states-may-have-interfered-in-brexit-vote-report-says?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard I wouldn't wipe my arse on the Guardian, talk about bias and bollocks? It makes the Sun look positively high-brow. But if this is true, which way would foreign interference have tried to swing the vote do you think? They are just reporting on what the committee has found. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-voting-website-crash-caused-by-foreign-cyber-attack-report-reveals-a3513121.html So, who would cause this if most of the world wanted the UK to remain and which side would something like this possibly help? A side that wants to see division in Europe a weakened uk and eu if Europe is busy with infighting some other large country could take advantage of the weakenEU currency and weekend co operation....hmmm can you think of such a country?" Maybe you should look at what they are talking about. The site crashed which gave the government an excuse to extend the deadline for voters to register, which they thought would be to the advantage of the remain vote. Our government at the time wouldn't have done this on purpose now would they?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report by the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee (PACAC) said MPs were deeply concerned about the allegations of foreign interference in last year’s Brexit vote. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/12/foreign-states-may-have-interfered-in-brexit-vote-report-says?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard I wouldn't wipe my arse on the Guardian, talk about bias and bollocks? It makes the Sun look positively high-brow. But if this is true, which way would foreign interference have tried to swing the vote do you think? They are just reporting on what the committee has found. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-voting-website-crash-caused-by-foreign-cyber-attack-report-reveals-a3513121.html So, who would cause this if most of the world wanted the UK to remain and which side would something like this possibly help? A side that wants to see division in Europe a weakened uk and eu if Europe is busy with infighting some other large country could take advantage of the weakenEU currency and weekend co operation....hmmm can you think of such a country? Maybe you should look at what they are talking about. The site crashed which gave the government an excuse to extend the deadline for voters to register, which they thought would be to the advantage of the remain vote. Our government at the time wouldn't have done this on purpose now would they? "you asked which country would wana sway the vote I answered the question | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report by the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee (PACAC) said MPs were deeply concerned about the allegations of foreign interference in last year’s Brexit vote. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/12/foreign-states-may-have-interfered-in-brexit-vote-report-says?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard I wouldn't wipe my arse on the Guardian, talk about bias and bollocks? It makes the Sun look positively high-brow. But if this is true, which way would foreign interference have tried to swing the vote do you think? They are just reporting on what the committee has found. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-voting-website-crash-caused-by-foreign-cyber-attack-report-reveals-a3513121.html So, who would cause this if most of the world wanted the UK to remain and which side would something like this possibly help? A side that wants to see division in Europe a weakened uk and eu if Europe is busy with infighting some other large country could take advantage of the weakenEU currency and weekend co operation....hmmm can you think of such a country? Maybe you should look at what they are talking about. The site crashed which gave the government an excuse to extend the deadline for voters to register, which they thought would be to the advantage of the remain vote. Our government at the time wouldn't have done this on purpose now would they? you asked which country would wana sway the vote I answered the question "I can assure you that No Missing Links knocked my door trying to persuade me to vote either way Did I miss out on free prawn crackers, do they do liver for free on orders over £15 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report by the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee (PACAC) said MPs were deeply concerned about the allegations of foreign interference in last year’s Brexit vote. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/12/foreign-states-may-have-interfered-in-brexit-vote-report-says?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard I wouldn't wipe my arse on the Guardian, talk about bias and bollocks? It makes the Sun look positively high-brow. But if this is true, which way would foreign interference have tried to swing the vote do you think? They are just reporting on what the committee has found. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-voting-website-crash-caused-by-foreign-cyber-attack-report-reveals-a3513121.html So, who would cause this if most of the world wanted the UK to remain and which side would something like this possibly help? A side that wants to see division in Europe a weakened uk and eu if Europe is busy with infighting some other large country could take advantage of the weakenEU currency and weekend co operation....hmmm can you think of such a country? Maybe you should look at what they are talking about. The site crashed which gave the government an excuse to extend the deadline for voters to register, which they thought would be to the advantage of the remain vote. Our government at the time wouldn't have done this on purpose now would they? you asked which country would wana sway the vote I answered the question "I'm sure all countries would want to sway the vote one way or another if they could but I asked which side this possible interference was supposed to help? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Frankly the votes have been cast and we're now on our merry Brexit way so really who gives a fuck "CLCC  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would of thought China wanted us in the EU and Russia wanted us out.I wouldn't worry the illusion of democracy helps everyone sleep well. "That's totally disrespectful to those who fought and died so that the common man has a chance to be involved. I'm guessing the suffragettes died in vain | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Frankly the votes have been cast and we're now on our merry Brexit way so really who gives a fuck
CLCC "It was a lovely day weekend when we visited Bruges on the day of the result I couldn't believe the reception we got with some people actually crying because we had voted to leave As I said to them, it's not that we dislike Europe, we just don't want to play a part in the social experiment called the EU anymore | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A report by the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee (PACAC) said MPs were deeply concerned about the allegations of foreign interference in last year’s Brexit vote. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/apr/12/foreign-states-may-have-interfered-in-brexit-vote-report-says?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard" Did they mention Obama, Merkel, Hollande, Lagarde, and a whole host of other foreigners trying to 'interfere' in the referendum, or just the ones that they thought may possibly benefit from a leave vote? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
