FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Should the NHS be means tested?

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

There is a poll going on on a other site on this so I thought it would be good to compare results off here...being it people with strong views. So please if you need to comment do so but can you start of with a yes or no....it makes counting easier

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No. Why should I pay again for something that I already contribute for through my NI contributions, so the lazy arses who won't work can get it free? All this would affect are the average workers. Those who are on benefits wouldn't pay and those that are rich would have private health care or not be bothered about cost.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"No. Why should I pay again for something that I already contribute for through my NI contributions, so the lazy arses who won't work can get it free? All this would affect are the average workers. Those who are on benefits wouldn't pay and those that are rich would have private health care or not be bothered about cost. "

No

I agree but just trying to see how the results compare

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No, of course not. People pay in, they are entitled to health care. End of

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

No

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Well that seems to be going the same way thank god...but have a look at the rest they are voting on

Free bus passes for over-65s Means-tested Available to all

Disability benefits Means-tested Available to all

Free NHS access Means-tested Available to all

The full student loan (ie, means-tested on parental income) Means-tested Available to all

Free care home access Means-tested Available to all

European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) Means-tested Available to all

Free school transport for under-16s Means-tested Available to all

Sight/hearing tests Means-tested Available to all

Free museum access Means-tested Available to all

Child benefit Means-tested Available to all

NHS prescriptions Means-tested Available to all

Free TV licences for over-75s Means-tested Available to all

State pension Means-tested Available to all

Free school meals (ie, means-tested on parental income) Means-tested Available to all

Free library access Means-tested Available to all

Passport costs Means-tested Available to all.

It's too big a list to do a poll on here but please comment on any you would means test

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge

Yes.

.

.

.

.

As soon as illness and injury are also means tested and only impact those with the ability to pay. Until then, no.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Yes.

.

.

.

.

As soon as illness and injury are also means tested and only impact those with the ability to pay. Until then, no. "

No ! Ps you had me going then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There is a poll going on on a other site on this so I thought it would be good to compare results off here...being it people with strong views. So please if you need to comment do so but can you start of with a yes or no....it makes counting easier "

maybe?

Or we increase NI contributions to put more in?

Or maybe those who abuse the NHS - be charged a fixed penalty -e.g. need an ambulance as a taxi, self inflicted - d*unk from binge drinking?

Or plug some of the tax avoidance schemes - before someone can be a limited company that have to have a turnover of £1m to stop the dividends scandal?

Or an education program about the NHS - use pharmacies more before going to the doctor?

Surgeries opening at 6am - 6pm so people can use them when it suits them?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


"

Or plug some of the tax avoidance schemes - before someone can be a limited company that have to have a turnover of £1m to stop the dividends scandal?

"

Wow... nice way to kill off any small business revenue in the UK. I ran a limited company for 15 years that almost hit the £1M turnover mark, but not quite. We employed 15 people at our peak. Salary and tax accounted for about 70% of our outgoings.

-Matt

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ercuryMan
over a year ago

Grantham

The NHS of today is not the NHS of its conception day.

A serious cross-party debate in both Houses please.

Something meaningful needs to be done for our children and grand-children to have as a legacy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Or plug some of the tax avoidance schemes - before someone can be a limited company that have to have a turnover of £1m to stop the dividends scandal?

Wow... nice way to kill off any small business revenue in the UK. I ran a limited company for 15 years that almost hit the £1M turnover mark, but not quite. We employed 15 people at our peak. Salary and tax accounted for about 70% of our outgoings.

-Matt"

Understand what your saying - was aimed at 1 man band on minimal turnovers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


"

Or plug some of the tax avoidance schemes - before someone can be a limited company that have to have a turnover of £1m to stop the dividends scandal?

Wow... nice way to kill off any small business revenue in the UK. I ran a limited company for 15 years that almost hit the £1M turnover mark, but not quite. We employed 15 people at our peak. Salary and tax accounted for about 70% of our outgoings.

-Matt

Understand what your saying - was aimed at 1 man band on minimal turnovers. "

Fair enough... but that company started as a 1 man band. As is my current company.

-Matt

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

NO

on saying that I am at this moment sitting in a private room awaiting an operation through private health insurance. This is saving NHS costs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"NO

on saying that I am at this moment sitting in a private room awaiting an operation through private health insurance. This is saving NHS costs"

Well, perhaps to a certain extent. Bear in mind that the Doctor and staff operating on you will have had very expensive training thanks to the state funded NHS. I say this as someone who had also benefited from private medical insurance but I am mindful of the fact that those who treated me were NHS employees working privately part time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"Well that seems to be going the same way thank god...but have a look at the rest they are voting on

Free bus passes for over-65s Means-tested Available to all

Disability benefits Means-tested Available to all

Free NHS access Means-tested Available to all

The full student loan (ie, means-tested on parental income) Means-tested Available to all

Free care home access Means-tested Available to all

European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) Means-tested Available to all

Free school transport for under-16s Means-tested Available to all

Sight/hearing tests Means-tested Available to all

Free museum access Means-tested Available to all

Child benefit Means-tested Available to all

NHS prescriptions Means-tested Available to all

Free TV licences for over-75s Means-tested Available to all

State pension Means-tested Available to all

Free school meals (ie, means-tested on parental income) Means-tested Available to all

Free library access Means-tested Available to all

Passport costs Means-tested Available to all.

It's too big a list to do a poll on here but please comment on any you would means test "
Every item on this list has reasons for yes and no,but basically I believe that the NHS should only be for those who are British,and people who choose to live abroad should not be allowed certain benefits,ie heating allowance.

Also there should be no private medical system,there should be a two teir NHS only.If you wish to pay you can,get the treatment you get now but the money goes to the NHS not private companies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"NO

on saying that I am at this moment sitting in a private room awaiting an operation through private health insurance. This is saving NHS costs

Well, perhaps to a certain extent. Bear in mind that the Doctor and staff operating on you will have had very expensive training thanks to the state funded NHS. I say this as someone who had also benefited from private medical insurance but I am mindful of the fact that those who treated me were NHS employees working privately part time. "

Yes absolutely,

but the difference being, is that I selected / chose the surgeon

and from initial GP meeting to obtain referral,- to first consultation including MRI scan on same day was a total of 5 days

then surgical operation in theatre was a further 9 days (through my choice of date)

you also receive better pain medication (oxy) and after care is first class.

NHS is good, but I chose private health care as I consider my health as number 1 priority

some wont think twice about purchasing an expensive car but wont pay for medical care

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No

But the same goes for other benefits. If you lose your job and your partner is wealthy, you're not entitled to much. Even though you're making a bigger contribution.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"NO

on saying that I am at this moment sitting in a private room awaiting an operation through private health insurance. This is saving NHS costs

Well, perhaps to a certain extent. Bear in mind that the Doctor and staff operating on you will have had very expensive training thanks to the state funded NHS. I say this as someone who had also benefited from private medical insurance but I am mindful of the fact that those who treated me were NHS employees working privately part time.

Yes absolutely,

but the difference being, is that I selected / chose the surgeon

and from initial GP meeting to obtain referral,- to first consultation including MRI scan on same day was a total of 5 days

then surgical operation in theatre was a further 9 days (through my choice of date)

you also receive better pain medication (oxy) and after care is first class.

NHS is good, but I chose private health care as I consider my health as number 1 priority

some wont think twice about purchasing an expensive car but wont pay for medical care"
I am waiting for surgery at present and cannot afford private but have chosen my surgeon.The result is I am waiting months for surgery and I am in pain constantly,is this right?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"NO

on saying that I am at this moment sitting in a private room awaiting an operation through private health insurance. This is saving NHS costs

Well, perhaps to a certain extent. Bear in mind that the Doctor and staff operating on you will have had very expensive training thanks to the state funded NHS. I say this as someone who had also benefited from private medical insurance but I am mindful of the fact that those who treated me were NHS employees working privately part time.

Yes absolutely,

but the difference being, is that I selected / chose the surgeon

and from initial GP meeting to obtain referral,- to first consultation including MRI scan on same day was a total of 5 days

then surgical operation in theatre was a further 9 days (through my choice of date)

you also receive better pain medication (oxy) and after care is first class.

NHS is good, but I chose private health care as I consider my health as number 1 priority

some wont think twice about purchasing an expensive car but wont pay for medical careI am waiting for surgery at present and cannot afford private but have chosen my surgeon.The result is I am waiting months for surgery and I am in pain constantly,is this right?

"

wait times are disappointing and one of the reasons I chose to go private, you also get better recovery treatment & medications.

one interesting small point; post operation, the whole hospital was fully evacuated due to a bomb scare, \surgery was still ongoing for some patients and had to be halted.

Police said this was the 2nd Edinburgh hospital to receive a bomb threat that night

strange who no news station covered this, police told a nurse that the phone calls were from overseas and a new way of disrupting services

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

strange How

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *LCCCouple
over a year ago

Cambridge


"NO

on saying that I am at this moment sitting in a private room awaiting an operation through private health insurance. This is saving NHS costs

Well, perhaps to a certain extent. Bear in mind that the Doctor and staff operating on you will have had very expensive training thanks to the state funded NHS. I say this as someone who had also benefited from private medical insurance but I am mindful of the fact that those who treated me were NHS employees working privately part time.

Yes absolutely,

but the difference being, is that I selected / chose the surgeon

and from initial GP meeting to obtain referral,- to first consultation including MRI scan on same day was a total of 5 days

then surgical operation in theatre was a further 9 days (through my choice of date)

you also receive better pain medication (oxy) and after care is first class.

NHS is good, but I chose private health care as I consider my health as number 1 priority

some wont think twice about purchasing an expensive car but wont pay for medical careI am waiting for surgery at present and cannot afford private but have chosen my surgeon.The result is I am waiting months for surgery and I am in pain constantly,is this right?

wait times are disappointing and one of the reasons I chose to go private, you also get better recovery treatment & medications.

one interesting small point; post operation, the whole hospital was fully evacuated due to a bomb scare, \surgery was still ongoing for some patients and had to be halted.

Police said this was the 2nd Edinburgh hospital to receive a bomb threat that night

strange who no news station covered this, police told a nurse that the phone calls were from overseas and a new way of disrupting services"

Who knows, it could be Putin's henchmen?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No.

The super rich go private anyway and lots of large corporations give their employees BUPA or similar. If it was means tested how would it be funded? Wouldn't it fall apart if only the poorest were getting treatment , who's paying into it then ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No.

The super rich go private anyway and lots of large corporations give their employees BUPA or similar. If it was means tested how would it be funded? Wouldn't it fall apart if only the poorest were getting treatment , who's paying into it then ? "

strange how "the poorest" can afford sky tv an mobile phones, yet they cannot afford private health care

.

guess its all down to priorities

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No.

The super rich go private anyway and lots of large corporations give their employees BUPA or similar. If it was means tested how would it be funded? Wouldn't it fall apart if only the poorest were getting treatment , who's paying into it then ?

strange how "the poorest" can afford sky tv an mobile phones, yet they cannot afford private health care

.

guess its all down to priorities "

Very true. Netflix is much cheaper.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"No.

The super rich go private anyway and lots of large corporations give their employees BUPA or similar. If it was means tested how would it be funded? Wouldn't it fall apart if only the poorest were getting treatment , who's paying into it then ?

strange how "the poorest" can afford sky tv an mobile phones, yet they cannot afford private health care

.

guess its all down to priorities "

To be honest a mobile phone is dirt cheap and a necessity in life today...and as for sky TV. ...I think the poorest are not daft enough to pay to view what can be got for free

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No.

The super rich go private anyway and lots of large corporations give their employees BUPA or similar. If it was means tested how would it be funded? Wouldn't it fall apart if only the poorest were getting treatment , who's paying into it then ?

strange how "the poorest" can afford sky tv an mobile phones, yet they cannot afford private health care

.

guess its all down to priorities

To be honest a mobile phone is dirt cheap and a necessity in life today...and as for sky TV. ...I think the poorest are not daft enough to pay to view what can be got for free "

lol - a mobile phone is a necessity in life

what a sad world

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orum TrollWoman
over a year ago

•+• Access Denied •+•


"No.

The super rich go private anyway and lots of large corporations give their employees BUPA or similar. If it was means tested how would it be funded? Wouldn't it fall apart if only the poorest were getting treatment , who's paying into it then ?

strange how "the poorest" can afford sky tv an mobile phones, yet they cannot afford private health care

.

guess its all down to priorities

To be honest a mobile phone is dirt cheap and a necessity in life today...and as for sky TV. ...I think the poorest are not daft enough to pay to view what can be got for free

lol - a mobile phone is a necessity in life

what a sad world"

if the job centre needs to call you, you need a phone.

my opinion of sad is looking at poor people and thinking they should have nothing just because there is a economical system in place that ensures there are poor people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"No.

The super rich go private anyway and lots of large corporations give their employees BUPA or similar. If it was means tested how would it be funded? Wouldn't it fall apart if only the poorest were getting treatment , who's paying into it then ?

strange how "the poorest" can afford sky tv an mobile phones, yet they cannot afford private health care

.

guess its all down to priorities

To be honest a mobile phone is dirt cheap and a necessity in life today...and as for sky TV. ...I think the poorest are not daft enough to pay to view what can be got for free

lol - a mobile phone is a necessity in life

what a sad world

if the job centre needs to call you, you need a phone.

my opinion of sad is looking at poor people and thinking they should have nothing just because there is a economical system in place that ensures there are poor people."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top