FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

America... What the fuck!!!

Jump to newest
 

By *orwegian Blue OP   Man
over a year ago

Iceland, but Aldi is closer..

Ok, so we knew he was a loon,

But really??

.

Suggestions on what crazy things Trump will do next?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obwithkiltMan
over a year ago

Belton

what has he done now??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

It's become a daily ritual - lets turn on the telly and see what the madman has done now!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yrdwomanWoman
over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

If I could block that man from my life I'd be happy. I hope this post is moved to the politics forum soon so I don't have to see him on here either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Won't somebody think of the children

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pLyobNsBDHI/hqdefault.jpg

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *taffs_hotwifeCouple
over a year ago

Wolverhampton


"If I could block that man from my life I'd be happy. I hope this post is moved to the politics forum soon so I don't have to see him on here either."

This! Mods, please move to the correct forum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orwegian Blue OP   Man
over a year ago

Iceland, but Aldi is closer..


"If I could block that man from my life I'd be happy. I hope this post is moved to the politics forum soon so I don't have to see him on here either."

Quick,

Sign the petition to keep him out of the UK...

.

Perhaps the British government could build a wall around the UK to stop him getting in, and make him pay for it...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Quick,

Sign the petition to keep him out of the UK...

.

Perhaps the British government could build a wall around the UK to stop him getting in, and make him pay for it... "

Yeah, we kind of need people to trade with at the moment. So no.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" "

Such a proud people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Such a proud people."

You shouldn't rub it in. My eyes hurt from crying.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm concerned that him coming here could trigger more terrorist attacks; maybe even an assassination attempt.

Am I being dramatic?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My new Gnr bag sums it up beautifully. It's got a pic of a grenade on and it say "good morning America how are you?" xxx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm concerned that him coming here could trigger more terrorist attacks; maybe even an assassination attempt.

Am I being dramatic?"

Sadly no. Xxx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"what has he done now?? "

Unsure, Google had nothing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *crumdiddlyumptiousMan
over a year ago

.

The Saudis, Russians and the Chinese have all been hear recently, Why not the leader of one our main allies and potentially a major trading partner

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ok, so we knew he was a loon,

But really??

.

Suggestions on what crazy things Trump will do next? "

Blower up the planet......I'm serious

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The Saudis, Russians and the Chinese have all been hear recently, Why not the leader of one our main allies and potentially a major trading partner"

Who recieves more media coverage...

I'll leave that one there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think he will manufacture a war in the Middle East. It will be good for America right? Good for the Arms trade, somehow he will benefit financially from it.

I think he is being deliberately inflammatory to facilitate an attack on the states so he can start a war.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irceWoman
over a year ago

Gloucester

He is no different from any other political/religious belief system!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenscentitCouple
over a year ago

barnstaple

We have had people here that are far worse.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *crumdiddlyumptiousMan
over a year ago

.


"I think he will manufacture a war in the Middle East. It will be good for America right? Good for the Arms trade, somehow he will benefit financially from it.

I think he is being deliberately inflammatory to facilitate an attack on the states so he can start a war."

Make money from the arms trade by starting or being involved in wars ? If only someone had thought of that before

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

He could help europe with extreme vetting, to restore order

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agneto.Man
over a year ago

Bham

I don't think he will start a war. I think he will be an isolationist. Apart from backing Israel.

The Israel thing is the only thing I really disagree with him on.

I have no idea why people are protesting here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orwegian Blue OP   Man
over a year ago

Iceland, but Aldi is closer..

Ok,

Please forget the crap involved with this man..

.

Suggestions for the next daft idea he will have..

You know, funny and amusing..

I think it's called satire and us British are usually pretty good at that...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"Won't somebody think of the children "

[ wrings hands, hugs a leftie tree and offers own home to all the economic refugees of the world ]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I like him and this what his did.

Barack Obama just bomb Muslim country and nobody seen the problem. He just close the door, Europe should do the same.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley

I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Won't somebody think of the children

[ wrings hands, hugs a leftie tree and offers own home to all the economic refugees of the world ]"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Won't somebody think of the children

[ wrings hands, hugs a leftie tree and offers own home to all the economic refugees of the world ]"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"Ok, so we knew he was a loon,

But really??

.

Suggestions on what crazy things Trump will do next?

Blower up the planet......I'm serious "

He doesn't have exclusive rights to push the "Red Button" though. Dubbya could have done that ages ago if that was the case

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Trump ban people from 7 Muslim nations : The Left have seizures.

lsraeli citizens are banned from entering 16 Muslim nations, the Left wing? : Free Palestine!

Ever consistent l see.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yrdwomanWoman
over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

I really don't know why having empathy for people who have literally been bombed out of their homes is now considered 'lefty'.

Anyway, if trump is really concerned about Muslims entering the US, why didn't he put a ban on Muslims from ALL Muslim countries? the countries on his list are not indicated in any attacks on the US at all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obwithkiltMan
over a year ago

Belton


"I'm concerned that him coming here could trigger more terrorist attacks; maybe even an assassination attempt.

Am I being dramatic?"

i hope not...his vp is an even worse in some ways if they end up with him!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 31/01/17 18:36:10]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 31/01/17 18:36:51]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I really don't know why having empathy for people who have literally been bombed out of their homes is now considered 'lefty'.

Anyway, if trump is really concerned about Muslims entering the US, why didn't he put a ban on Muslims from ALL Muslim countries? the countries on his list are not indicated in any attacks on the US at all."

There are dozens of neighbouring countries with similar cultures, languages and religion yet they can only find refugee in the richest and most alien countries? Hmmm. Funny that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yrdwomanWoman
over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum


"I really don't know why having empathy for people who have literally been bombed out of their homes is now considered 'lefty'.

Anyway, if trump is really concerned about Muslims entering the US, why didn't he put a ban on Muslims from ALL Muslim countries? the countries on his list are not indicated in any attacks on the US at all.

There are dozens of neighbouring countries with similar cultures, languages and religion yet they can only find refugee in the richest and most alien countries? Hmmm. Funny that."

I literally have no idea what you're on about.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ok, so we knew he was a loon,

But really??

.

Suggestions on what crazy things Trump will do next? "

Join fab and let us fuck his wife

( if you're already here.... no you can't fucking watch you prick)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley

He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow"

*predominantly*

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*"

That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe"

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I really don't know why having empathy for people who have literally been bombed out of their homes is now considered 'lefty'.

Anyway, if trump is really concerned about Muslims entering the US, why didn't he put a ban on Muslims from ALL Muslim countries? the countries on his list are not indicated in any attacks on the US at all.

There are dozens of neighbouring countries with similar cultures, languages and religion yet they can only find refugee in the richest and most alien countries? Hmmm. Funny that.

I literally have no idea what you're on about."

l know. lt'll be okay.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad."

..and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion. "

Lets close them and then see what will or won't happen

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening."

lt's sad

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening."

It is because of political correctness, noone are allowed to speak their mind like in the usa, history will judge them hard.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estivalMan
over a year ago

borehamwood

Dont know why everyone is getting so wound up about wat he is doing.hes doing exactly what he said he was going to do before he got elected.shock horror a politician actually keeping his word shame ours dont do what they say they are going to do

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

lt's sad "

That is right it is, although there is an election next year and the swedish democrats is the most popular party to win, there will be a big change with the vetting they will do.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Crazy thing next ?

Concentrate on his own country and stop invading others !

Oops hang on ?

That's sensible !

Er ? And he may do just that !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

lt's sad "

...And it's pure evil.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion.

Lets close them and then see what will or won't happen"

How do you suggest that we close them then? There are many illegal immigrants here already, mostly asylum seekers who have risked their lives to get here for a better life. Can you out the good from the bad? Is it even possible?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Dont know why everyone is getting so wound up about wat he is doing.hes doing exactly what he said he was going to do before he got elected.shock horror a politician actually keeping his word shame ours dont do what they say they are going to do"

Exactly !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

lt's sad ...And it's pure evil."

That is right, it is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion.

Lets close them and then see what will or won't happen

How do you suggest that we close them then? There are many illegal immigrants here already, mostly asylum seekers who have risked their lives to get here for a better life. Can you out the good from the bad? Is it even possible? "

We close them the same way the US is

Then we start ing out the good from the bad

That is the problem with lefties which has almost brought Europe and the US to the brink of a disaster. They give up before even starting. Talk, talk, talk; never do anything which might be unpopular or requires any thinking or effort. Then we wonder why people like Trump become the President of the US

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If I could block that man from my life I'd be happy. I hope this post is moved to the politics forum soon so I don't have to see him on here either.

Quick,

Sign the petition to keep him out of the UK...

.

Perhaps the British government could build a wall around the UK to stop him getting in, and make him pay for it... "

LOL; yes, you will find it at the top of the google listing - to keep him out of UK and to continue bad mouthing him

.

Why

.

Because Google have fallen out with him big time;

.

Try the same search for the petition to keep the visit to UK

.

you will have trouble finding it,

why?

because Google don't want it found

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enard ArgenteMan
over a year ago

London and France

Actually, in many ways, Trump is no longer the actual problem;

The root of the problem is Steve Bannon, who now is, to all intents and purposes, the US government.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion.

Lets close them and then see what will or won't happen

How do you suggest that we close them then? There are many illegal immigrants here already, mostly asylum seekers who have risked their lives to get here for a better life. Can you out the good from the bad? Is it even possible?

We close them the same way the US is

Then we start ing out the good from the bad

That is the problem with lefties which has almost brought Europe and the US to the brink of a disaster. They give up before even starting. Talk, talk, talk; never do anything which might be unpopular or requires any thinking or effort. Then we wonder why people like Trump become the President of the US

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!"

Whether they be an economic refugee or an asylum seeker, how do you propose to differentiate between someone who wants to settle in a peaceful country, or someone who had desires to cause chaos &mayhem by blowing people up or driving trucks into crowded areas after being in contact with other people over the internet?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion.

Lets close them and then see what will or won't happen

How do you suggest that we close them then? There are many illegal immigrants here already, mostly asylum seekers who have risked their lives to get here for a better life. Can you out the good from the bad? Is it even possible?

We close them the same way the US is

Then we start ing out the good from the bad

That is the problem with lefties which has almost brought Europe and the US to the brink of a disaster. They give up before even starting. Talk, talk, talk; never do anything which might be unpopular or requires any thinking or effort. Then we wonder why people like Trump become the President of the US

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!"

Ok, so let's put your numbers into context.

Obama deported 2.5 million illegal immigrants in 6 years. So on average about 1140 people a day. More than any other president in history.

Trump has had 119 people (his number) questioned further on entering in a few days. How many days is that over? Maybe 3 days? So about 40 people a day have been questioned.

Does that sound like an effective policy? Even if you discount the 10s of thousands of people affected by this. And the mass dissent in his country and across the world as a result. And discount that you are thousands of times more likely to be shot by a toddler than by attacked by a terrorist. And no terrorist attacks have been done on YS soil by citizens of any of those banned countries.

Clearly you can see this is nothing about immigrants or national safety.

-Matt

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ok,

Please forget the crap involved with this man..

.

Suggestions for the next daft idea he will have..

You know, funny and amusing..

I think it's called satire and us British are usually pretty good at that... "

In which case he will probably concentrate his efforts on a cure for male pattern baldness

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley

[Removed by poster at 31/01/17 19:25:44]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


"If I could block that man from my life I'd be happy. I hope this post is moved to the politics forum soon so I don't have to see him on here either.

Quick,

Sign the petition to keep him out of the UK...

.

Perhaps the British government could build a wall around the UK to stop him getting in, and make him pay for it...

LOL; yes, you will find it at the top of the google listing - to keep him out of UK and to continue bad mouthing him

.

Why

.

Because Google have fallen out with him big time;

.

Try the same search for the petition to keep the visit to UK

.

you will have trouble finding it,

why?

because Google don't want it found"

Or because Google is doing what it is designed to do and show results for pages lots of people have linked to. More people have linked to the petition to cancel the state visit by several orders of magnitude.

-Matt

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion.

Lets close them and then see what will or won't happen

How do you suggest that we close them then? There are many illegal immigrants here already, mostly asylum seekers who have risked their lives to get here for a better life. Can you out the good from the bad? Is it even possible?

We close them the same way the US is

Then we start ing out the good from the bad

That is the problem with lefties which has almost brought Europe and the US to the brink of a disaster. They give up before even starting. Talk, talk, talk; never do anything which might be unpopular or requires any thinking or effort. Then we wonder why people like Trump become the President of the US

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Ok, so let's put your numbers into context.

Obama deported 2.5 million illegal immigrants in 6 years. So on average about 1140 people a day. More than any other president in history.

Trump has had 119 people (his number) questioned further on entering in a few days. How many days is that over? Maybe 3 days? So about 40 people a day have been questioned.

Does that sound like an effective policy? Even if you discount the 10s of thousands of people affected by this. And the mass dissent in his country and across the world as a result. And discount that you are thousands of times more likely to be shot by a toddler than by attacked by a terrorist. And no terrorist attacks have been done on YS soil by citizens of any of those banned countries.

Clearly you can see this is nothing about immigrants or national safety.

-Matt"

Source for all the numbers, please?

Including the statistics of being shot by a toddler:terrorist

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion.

Lets close them and then see what will or won't happen

How do you suggest that we close them then? There are many illegal immigrants here already, mostly asylum seekers who have risked their lives to get here for a better life. Can you out the good from the bad? Is it even possible?

We close them the same way the US is

Then we start ing out the good from the bad

That is the problem with lefties which has almost brought Europe and the US to the brink of a disaster. They give up before even starting. Talk, talk, talk; never do anything which might be unpopular or requires any thinking or effort. Then we wonder why people like Trump become the President of the US

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Whether they be an economic refugee or an asylum seeker, how do you propose to differentiate between someone who wants to settle in a peaceful country, or someone who had desires to cause chaos &mayhem by blowing people up or driving trucks into crowded areas after being in contact with other people over the internet? "

..Merkels biggest mistake was not taking them direct from refugee camps..the sensible way...but European leaders don't do sensible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If I could block that man from my life I'd be happy. I hope this post is moved to the politics forum soon so I don't have to see him on here either.

Quick,

Sign the petition to keep him out of the UK...

.

Perhaps the British government could build a wall around the UK to stop him getting in, and make him pay for it...

LOL; yes, you will find it at the top of the google listing - to keep him out of UK and to continue bad mouthing him

.

Why

.

Because Google have fallen out with him big time;

.

Try the same search for the petition to keep the visit to UK

.

you will have trouble finding it,

why?

because Google don't want it found"

Leftie tree hugging google.Maybe the illuminati are behind it.Alex jones thinks so

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If I could block that man from my life I'd be happy. I hope this post is moved to the politics forum soon so I don't have to see him on here either.

Quick,

Sign the petition to keep him out of the UK...

.

Perhaps the British government could build a wall around the UK to stop him getting in, and make him pay for it...

LOL; yes, you will find it at the top of the google listing - to keep him out of UK and to continue bad mouthing him

.

Why

.

Because Google have fallen out with him big time;

.

Try the same search for the petition to keep the visit to UK

.

you will have trouble finding it,

why?

because Google don't want it found

Or because Google is doing what it is designed to do and show results for pages lots of people have linked to. More people have linked to the petition to cancel the state visit by several orders of magnitude.

-Matt"

Matt;

open your eyes

you only see what broadcasters want you to see, you need to search the bigger picture

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion.

Lets close them and then see what will or won't happen

How do you suggest that we close them then? There are many illegal immigrants here already, mostly asylum seekers who have risked their lives to get here for a better life. Can you out the good from the bad? Is it even possible?

We close them the same way the US is

Then we start ing out the good from the bad

That is the problem with lefties which has almost brought Europe and the US to the brink of a disaster. They give up before even starting. Talk, talk, talk; never do anything which might be unpopular or requires any thinking or effort. Then we wonder why people like Trump become the President of the US

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Whether they be an economic refugee or an asylum seeker, how do you propose to differentiate between someone who wants to settle in a peaceful country, or someone who had desires to cause chaos &mayhem by blowing people up or driving trucks into crowded areas after being in contact with other people over the internet? ..Merkels biggest mistake was not taking them direct from refugee camps..the sensible way...but European leaders don't do sensible."

That would have been the sensible and cost effective way of managing the situation. Merkel is an excellent economist but not a good strategist

Now that we have 3 million in Germany, the chances of them going back are slim to zero; I am just hoping that they will all head towards England; the land of milk, honey and housing benefits

Oh, no, they can’t; bl**dy Brexit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orwegian Blue OP   Man
over a year ago

Iceland, but Aldi is closer..


"Ok,

Please forget the crap involved with this man..

.

Suggestions for the next daft idea he will have..

You know, funny and amusing..

I think it's called satire and us British are usually pretty good at that...

In which case he will probably concentrate his efforts on a cure for male pattern baldness "

Hallefuckinglujah....

At least one person got it..

Jeez Louise, for the love of hillary Clinton, will you guys lighten up...

This is getting all to serious for my liking..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


"

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Ok, so let's put your numbers into context.

Obama deported 2.5 million illegal immigrants in 6 years. So on average about 1140 people a day. More than any other president in history.

Trump has had 119 people (his number) questioned further on entering in a few days. How many days is that over? Maybe 3 days? So about 40 people a day have been questioned.

Does that sound like an effective policy? Even if you discount the 10s of thousands of people affected by this. And the mass dissent in his country and across the world as a result. And discount that you are thousands of times more likely to be shot by a toddler than by attacked by a terrorist. And no terrorist attacks have been done on YS soil by citizens of any of those banned countries.

Clearly you can see this is nothing about immigrants or national safety.

-Matt

Source for all the numbers, please?

Including the statistics of being shot by a toddler:terrorist"

109 people (type 119 above by mistake), is Trump's number from his tweet yesterday.

2.5 million deported by Obama is from the DHS national statistics ending 2014. As reported in many sources, e.g. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661

People shot by toddlers... varies depending on year, but in 2016 there was 23 shot in first 4 months, and 0 killed by terrorists:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/01/toddlers-have-shot-at-least-23-people-this-year/?utm_term=.ecd93bd225b0

So the last stat was a bit tongue in cheek as clearly anything divided by zero is undefined, and could be interpreted as infinite.

-Matt

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ok, so we knew he was a loon,

But really??

.

Suggestions on what crazy things Trump will do next? "

Crazy?

or

Calculated

.

There is so much going on, that Trump has everyone running round like headless chickens

They don't know what to focus on!!!!

.

The Mexican wall??? what wall, oh shit, forgot about that due to 90 day ban,

oh but shit, what about...........

.

maybe, just maybe not so crazy after all

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Ok, so let's put your numbers into context.

Obama deported 2.5 million illegal immigrants in 6 years. So on average about 1140 people a day. More than any other president in history.

Trump has had 119 people (his number) questioned further on entering in a few days. How many days is that over? Maybe 3 days? So about 40 people a day have been questioned.

Does that sound like an effective policy? Even if you discount the 10s of thousands of people affected by this. And the mass dissent in his country and across the world as a result. And discount that you are thousands of times more likely to be shot by a toddler than by attacked by a terrorist. And no terrorist attacks have been done on YS soil by citizens of any of those banned countries.

Clearly you can see this is nothing about immigrants or national safety.

-Matt

Source for all the numbers, please?

Including the statistics of being shot by a toddler:terrorist

109 people (type 119 above by mistake), is Trump's number from his tweet yesterday.

2.5 million deported by Obama is from the DHS national statistics ending 2014. As reported in many sources, e.g. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661

People shot by toddlers... varies depending on year, but in 2016 there was 23 shot in first 4 months, and 0 killed by terrorists:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/01/toddlers-have-shot-at-least-23-people-this-year/?utm_term=.ecd93bd225b0

So the last stat was a bit tongue in cheek as clearly anything divided by zero is undefined, and could be interpreted as infinite.

-Matt

"

Are you seriously telling me that terrorists did not shoot (or rather kill) anyone in the US? So, who smacked into the twin towers? Oh, hang on; that was a US conspiracy; getouttahere

And all deportations have stopped stone cold since Obama stepped down on the 19th? Purlease. What makes you think that Trump isn't going to hunt down all the illegal Mexican immigrants. And do you think that he shouldn't? If not, then why not?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Ok,

Please forget the crap involved with this man..

.

Suggestions for the next daft idea he will have..

You know, funny and amusing..

I think it's called satire and us British are usually pretty good at that...

In which case he will probably concentrate his efforts on a cure for male pattern baldness

Hallefuckinglujah....

At least one person got it..

Jeez Louise, for the love of hillary Clinton, will you guys lighten up...

This is getting all to serious for my liking.. "

@.........

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago

North West


"

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Ok, so let's put your numbers into context.

Obama deported 2.5 million illegal immigrants in 6 years. So on average about 1140 people a day. More than any other president in history.

Trump has had 119 people (his number) questioned further on entering in a few days. How many days is that over? Maybe 3 days? So about 40 people a day have been questioned.

Does that sound like an effective policy? Even if you discount the 10s of thousands of people affected by this. And the mass dissent in his country and across the world as a result. And discount that you are thousands of times more likely to be shot by a toddler than by attacked by a terrorist. And no terrorist attacks have been done on YS soil by citizens of any of those banned countries.

Clearly you can see this is nothing about immigrants or national safety.

-Matt

Source for all the numbers, please?

Including the statistics of being shot by a toddler:terrorist

109 people (type 119 above by mistake), is Trump's number from his tweet yesterday.

2.5 million deported by Obama is from the DHS national statistics ending 2014. As reported in many sources, e.g. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661

People shot by toddlers... varies depending on year, but in 2016 there was 23 shot in first 4 months, and 0 killed by terrorists:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/01/toddlers-have-shot-at-least-23-people-this-year/?utm_term=.ecd93bd225b0

So the last stat was a bit tongue in cheek as clearly anything divided by zero is undefined, and could be interpreted as infinite.

-Matt

Are you seriously telling me that terrorists did not shoot (or rather kill) anyone in the US? So, who smacked into the twin towers? Oh, hang on; that was a US conspiracy; getouttahere

And all deportations have stopped stone cold since Obama stepped down on the 19th? Purlease. What makes you think that Trump isn't going to hunt down all the illegal Mexican immigrants. And do you think that he shouldn't? If not, then why not?"

Because Iran is a Shia state and seemingly unbeknown to the man child Shia's are not in the habit of committing mass atrocities in the West. Making America safe from exactly what? People who are not looking to commit mass atrocities in the US? People who have no history of committing mass atrocities in the West? People on whom the intelligence Agencies have no evidence whatsoever of terrorist intentions.

We can all give the man child a bit of a tip off and he can maybe pass it on to Mad Dog Mattiss.

Wahabbi Sunni ( Pssst Saudi Arabia )

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

lt's sad ...And it's pure evil."

given Shag normally comes out with the same old line and has not lived there for ten years its probably pure ignorance on his behalf ..

again..

but feel free to jump on any racist band wagon because someone uses a phrase like'little baghdad'..

coming next for the fab fascists to wank over, brown people have different colour skin to white folks..

discuss..

as you fap away..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

lt's sad ...And it's pure evil.

given Shag normally comes out with the same old line and has not lived there for ten years its probably pure ignorance on his behalf ..

again..

but feel free to jump on any racist band wagon because someone uses a phrase like'little baghdad'..

coming next for the fab fascists to wank over, brown people have different colour skin to white folks..

discuss..

as you fap away..

"

No, it is not, my relatives live there and tells me how it is and also I follow the news there.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago

Barbados


"

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Ok, so let's put your numbers into context.

Obama deported 2.5 million illegal immigrants in 6 years. So on average about 1140 people a day. More than any other president in history.

Trump has had 119 people (his number) questioned further on entering in a few days. How many days is that over? Maybe 3 days? So about 40 people a day have been questioned.

Does that sound like an effective policy? Even if you discount the 10s of thousands of people affected by this. And the mass dissent in his country and across the world as a result. And discount that you are thousands of times more likely to be shot by a toddler than by attacked by a terrorist. And no terrorist attacks have been done on YS soil by citizens of any of those banned countries.

Clearly you can see this is nothing about immigrants or national safety.

-Matt

Source for all the numbers, please?

Including the statistics of being shot by a toddler:terrorist

109 people (type 119 above by mistake), is Trump's number from his tweet yesterday.

2.5 million deported by Obama is from the DHS national statistics ending 2014. As reported in many sources, e.g. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661

People shot by toddlers... varies depending on year, but in 2016 there was 23 shot in first 4 months, and 0 killed by terrorists:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/01/toddlers-have-shot-at-least-23-people-this-year/?utm_term=.ecd93bd225b0

So the last stat was a bit tongue in cheek as clearly anything divided by zero is undefined, and could be interpreted as infinite.

-Matt

Are you seriously telling me that terrorists did not shoot (or rather kill) anyone in the US? So, who smacked into the twin towers? Oh, hang on; that was a US conspiracy; getouttahere

And all deportations have stopped stone cold since Obama stepped down on the 19th? Purlease. What makes you think that Trump isn't going to hunt down all the illegal Mexican immigrants. And do you think that he shouldn't? If not, then why not?"

No I'm not seriously saying that. In fact I'm not saying that at all. Read again.

-Matt

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Ok, so let's put your numbers into context.

Obama deported 2.5 million illegal immigrants in 6 years. So on average about 1140 people a day. More than any other president in history.

Trump has had 119 people (his number) questioned further on entering in a few days. How many days is that over? Maybe 3 days? So about 40 people a day have been questioned.

Does that sound like an effective policy? Even if you discount the 10s of thousands of people affected by this. And the mass dissent in his country and across the world as a result. And discount that you are thousands of times more likely to be shot by a toddler than by attacked by a terrorist. And no terrorist attacks have been done on YS soil by citizens of any of those banned countries.

Clearly you can see this is nothing about immigrants or national safety.

-Matt

Source for all the numbers, please?

Including the statistics of being shot by a toddler:terrorist

109 people (type 119 above by mistake), is Trump's number from his tweet yesterday.

2.5 million deported by Obama is from the DHS national statistics ending 2014. As reported in many sources, e.g. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661

People shot by toddlers... varies depending on year, but in 2016 there was 23 shot in first 4 months, and 0 killed by terrorists:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/01/toddlers-have-shot-at-least-23-people-this-year/?utm_term=.ecd93bd225b0

So the last stat was a bit tongue in cheek as clearly anything divided by zero is undefined, and could be interpreted as infinite.

-Matt

Are you seriously telling me that terrorists did not shoot (or rather kill) anyone in the US? So, who smacked into the twin towers? Oh, hang on; that was a US conspiracy; getouttahere

And all deportations have stopped stone cold since Obama stepped down on the 19th? Purlease. What makes you think that Trump isn't going to hunt down all the illegal Mexican immigrants. And do you think that he shouldn't? If not, then why not?

Because Iran is a Shia state and seemingly unbeknown to the man child Shia's are not in the habit of committing mass atrocities in the West. Making America safe from exactly what? People who are not looking to commit mass atrocities in the US? People who have no history of committing mass atrocities in the West? People on whom the intelligence Agencies have no evidence whatsoever of terrorist intentions.

We can all give the man child a bit of a tip off and he can maybe pass it on to Mad Dog Mattiss.

Wahabbi Sunni ( Pssst Saudi Arabia )"

Granted that he got the countries mixed up; all he knows is that they are somewhere far away and that they are Muslims. Maybe, once he has finished making his first few silly decisions, he will finally let the professionals in the administration to start advising him

I don't think the wall is going to work; i don't think that banning citizens from 7 countries is going to work

But what will work is his attitude which basically says, "be afraid; be very afraid"; nobody until now has had the b*lls to stand up against the apologists and stick two fingers at them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

But what will work is his attitude which basically says, "be afraid; be very afraid"; nobody until now has had the b*lls to stand up against the apologists and stick two fingers at them"

How would you compare him to Bush Jr. then?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"

But what will work is his attitude which basically says, "be afraid; be very afraid"; nobody until now has had the b*lls to stand up against the apologists and stick two fingers at them

How would you compare him to Bush Jr. then?"

Bush started wars; he is stopping all types of undesirables from entering the US and kicking out those who are a threat. Big difference

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enard ArgenteMan
over a year ago

London and France


"

But what will work is his attitude which basically says, "be afraid; be very afraid"; nobody until now has had the b*lls to stand up against the apologists and stick two fingers at them

How would you compare him to Bush Jr. then?

Bush started wars; he is stopping all types of undesirables from entering the US and kicking out those who are a threat. Big difference"

Except that he is in reality doing no such thing.

Just making incoherent noise for effect, driven by his white supremacist right hand man, Bannon.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucy3Couple
over a year ago

glasgow


"Dont know why everyone is getting so wound up about wat he is doing.hes doing exactly what he said he was going to do before he got elected.shock horror a politician actually keeping his word shame ours dont do what they say they are going to do"

Ffs!!!it can't be true.

Next thing you'll be telling us is,

The tree hugging,hippy,lefty,

holier than thou pc brigade,

Are refusing to accept the democratic vote.

It's just to far fetched.

Keep it real.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"

But what will work is his attitude which basically says, "be afraid; be very afraid"; nobody until now has had the b*lls to stand up against the apologists and stick two fingers at them

How would you compare him to Bush Jr. then?

Bush started wars; he is stopping all types of undesirables from entering the US and kicking out those who are a threat. Big difference

Except that he is in reality doing no such thing.

Just making incoherent noise for effect, driven by his white supremacist right hand man, Bannon."

I don't think one could say that; he just sacked someone for making the noises and thinking she was going to get away with it. And today is only day 11

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

But what will work is his attitude which basically says, "be afraid; be very afraid"; nobody until now has had the b*lls to stand up against the apologists and stick two fingers at them

How would you compare him to Bush Jr. then?

Bush started wars; he is stopping all types of undesirables from entering the US and kicking out those who are a threat. Big difference"

But neither Obama or Trump has stopped the wars. And who armed the middle east originally?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"

But what will work is his attitude which basically says, "be afraid; be very afraid"; nobody until now has had the b*lls to stand up against the apologists and stick two fingers at them

How would you compare him to Bush Jr. then?

Bush started wars; he is stopping all types of undesirables from entering the US and kicking out those who are a threat. Big difference

But neither Obama or Trump has stopped the wars. And who armed the middle east originally?"

I don't understand the point you are trying to make

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

But what will work is his attitude which basically says, "be afraid; be very afraid"; nobody until now has had the b*lls to stand up against the apologists and stick two fingers at them

How would you compare him to Bush Jr. then?

Bush started wars; he is stopping all types of undesirables from entering the US and kicking out those who are a threat. Big difference

But neither Obama or Trump has stopped the wars. And who armed the middle east originally?

I don't understand the point you are trying to make"

There is no point. Trying to understand your views. It intrigued me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion.

Lets close them and then see what will or won't happen

How do you suggest that we close them then? There are many illegal immigrants here already, mostly asylum seekers who have risked their lives to get here for a better life. Can you out the good from the bad? Is it even possible?

We close them the same way the US is

Then we start ing out the good from the bad

That is the problem with lefties which has almost brought Europe and the US to the brink of a disaster. They give up before even starting. Talk, talk, talk; never do anything which might be unpopular or requires any thinking or effort. Then we wonder why people like Trump become the President of the US

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Whether they be an economic refugee or an asylum seeker, how do you propose to differentiate between someone who wants to settle in a peaceful country, or someone who had desires to cause chaos &mayhem by blowing people up or driving trucks into crowded areas after being in contact with other people over the internet? ..Merkels biggest mistake was not taking them direct from refugee camps..the sensible way...but European leaders don't do sensible.

That would have been the sensible and cost effective way of managing the situation. Merkel is an excellent economist but not a good strategist

Now that we have 3 million in Germany, the chances of them going back are slim to zero; I am just hoping that they will all head towards England; the land of milk, honey and housing benefits

Oh, no, they can’t; bl**dy Brexit"

Merkel didn't make a mistake only the simple minded can't really see why she did was a stroke of genius and will make sure Germany is the strongest European country for decades...if you have a economy based on manufacturing you need 2 things raw materials and labour Merkel solved that labour problem for the next 20 years..hence why Germany will be much much stronger in manufacturing than the UK...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"I am concerened that him banning them from the US, will mean that even greater numbers will arrive in Europe

There are fundamentalists here already, no wall or barrier can stop atrocities happening. I know not all immigrants are terrorists, but closing borders will have no effect whatsoever in my opinion.

Lets close them and then see what will or won't happen

How do you suggest that we close them then? There are many illegal immigrants here already, mostly asylum seekers who have risked their lives to get here for a better life. Can you out the good from the bad? Is it even possible?

We close them the same way the US is

Then we start ing out the good from the bad

That is the problem with lefties which has almost brought Europe and the US to the brink of a disaster. They give up before even starting. Talk, talk, talk; never do anything which might be unpopular or requires any thinking or effort. Then we wonder why people like Trump become the President of the US

Economic refugees are not asylum seekers. And those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives should be given a safe place to stay and then then can return to their countries once it is relatively safer there. Those who still don't, become illegal immigrants and should be deported. It is in the immigration policies already; to deport illegal immigrants!!!

Whether they be an economic refugee or an asylum seeker, how do you propose to differentiate between someone who wants to settle in a peaceful country, or someone who had desires to cause chaos &mayhem by blowing people up or driving trucks into crowded areas after being in contact with other people over the internet? ..Merkels biggest mistake was not taking them direct from refugee camps..the sensible way...but European leaders don't do sensible.

That would have been the sensible and cost effective way of managing the situation. Merkel is an excellent economist but not a good strategist

Now that we have 3 million in Germany, the chances of them going back are slim to zero; I am just hoping that they will all head towards England; the land of milk, honey and housing benefits

Oh, no, they can’t; bl**dy Brexit Merkel didn't make a mistake only the simple minded can't really see why she did was a stroke of genius and will make sure Germany is the strongest European country for decades...if you have a economy based on manufacturing you need 2 things raw materials and labour Merkel solved that labour problem for the next 20 years..hence why Germany will be much much stronger in manufacturing than the UK..."

Absolute nonsense; this could only come from someone who is clueless about high-tech, industrialised nations

We don't need any more unskilled labour

Almost 20 years ago, we used to employ seasonal Polish labourers on our farm; sometimes as many as 30 men. Now with silos which are computerised, tractors which are controlled by SatNav systems, we only need 2 or 3 labourers

It is the same with our auto-manufacturing. Have you ever been to Stuttgart at the Mercedes plant? The inside looks like a ghost-town; Just a few people checking up on robots manufacturing our cars

What we need are highly educated automotive and robot engineers; not some dumbass shovelling sh*t all day

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

lt's sad ...And it's pure evil.

given Shag normally comes out with the same old line and has not lived there for ten years its probably pure ignorance on his behalf ..

again..

but feel free to jump on any racist band wagon because someone uses a phrase like'little baghdad'..

coming next for the fab fascists to wank over, brown people have different colour skin to white folks..

discuss..

as you fap away..

No, it is not, my relatives live there and tells me how it is and also I follow the news there."

someone's telling tales again then, Sweden itself does not rank in the top ten worse places affected by crime in Europe..

and as for Malmo with only a population of over 300,000 of which people from Iraq number just over 11,000 being the 2nd most violent in Europe..

well it clearly isn't based on a cursory look at the Swedish governments own crime stats..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

lt's sad ...And it's pure evil.

given Shag normally comes out with the same old line and has not lived there for ten years its probably pure ignorance on his behalf ..

again..

but feel free to jump on any racist band wagon because someone uses a phrase like'little baghdad'..

coming next for the fab fascists to wank over, brown people have different colour skin to white folks..

discuss..

as you fap away..

No, it is not, my relatives live there and tells me how it is and also I follow the news there.

someone's telling tales again then, Sweden itself does not rank in the top ten worse places affected by crime in Europe..

and as for Malmo with only a population of over 300,000 of which people from Iraq number just over 11,000 being the 2nd most violent in Europe..

well it clearly isn't based on a cursory look at the Swedish governments own crime stats..

"

What is your problem? It is you being ignorant. I know the situation more than you and we call it baghdad as a nickname.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enard ArgenteMan
over a year ago

London and France


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

lt's sad ...And it's pure evil.

given Shag normally comes out with the same old line and has not lived there for ten years its probably pure ignorance on his behalf ..

again..

but feel free to jump on any racist band wagon because someone uses a phrase like'little baghdad'..

coming next for the fab fascists to wank over, brown people have different colour skin to white folks..

discuss..

as you fap away..

No, it is not, my relatives live there and tells me how it is and also I follow the news there.

someone's telling tales again then, Sweden itself does not rank in the top ten worse places affected by crime in Europe..

and as for Malmo with only a population of over 300,000 of which people from Iraq number just over 11,000 being the 2nd most violent in Europe..

well it clearly isn't based on a cursory look at the Swedish governments own crime stats..

What is your problem? It is you being ignorant. I know the situation more than you and we call it baghdad as a nickname."

Considering that Malmo was until recently one of the most boring cities in northern hemisphere; I found the Arabic cafes and restaurants very refreshing and vibrant, and doing wonders for the local economy .

Certainly a good " go to " place now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

lt's sad ...And it's pure evil.

given Shag normally comes out with the same old line and has not lived there for ten years its probably pure ignorance on his behalf ..

again..

but feel free to jump on any racist band wagon because someone uses a phrase like'little baghdad'..

coming next for the fab fascists to wank over, brown people have different colour skin to white folks..

discuss..

as you fap away..

No, it is not, my relatives live there and tells me how it is and also I follow the news there.

someone's telling tales again then, Sweden itself does not rank in the top ten worse places affected by crime in Europe..

and as for Malmo with only a population of over 300,000 of which people from Iraq number just over 11,000 being the 2nd most violent in Europe..

well it clearly isn't based on a cursory look at the Swedish governments own crime stats..

What is your problem? It is you being ignorant. I know the situation more than you and we call it baghdad as a nickname."

Shag, your the one quoting something that can only be based on ignorance or with your track record most likely racism..

there must be some right thick fuckers who call something little baghdad when the number of people from Iraq are less than 1% of the population of that city..

either that or they have an agenda..

therein lies a problem..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Saudi oil minister Khalid al-Falih welcomes Trump era

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Saudi oil minister Khalid al-Falih welcomes Trump era

"

Obama bowed before the Saudi King Abdullah...now it's the other way around.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not banned citizens from 7 predominatly Muslim states from entering into the US forever; it is only for 90 days whilst his adminstration draws up immigration policies which protect and benefit the US

Something which Europe should urgently pay attention to and follow

*predominantly*That is right we need it. Malmo is now the 2nd most violent capital in europe, we call it little baghdad...and the good people of Sweden don't deserve this.. Why is this happening.

lt's sad ...And it's pure evil.

given Shag normally comes out with the same old line and has not lived there for ten years its probably pure ignorance on his behalf ..

again..

but feel free to jump on any racist band wagon because someone uses a phrase like'little baghdad'..

coming next for the fab fascists to wank over, brown people have different colour skin to white folks..

discuss..

as you fap away..

No, it is not, my relatives live there and tells me how it is and also I follow the news there.

someone's telling tales again then, Sweden itself does not rank in the top ten worse places affected by crime in Europe..

and as for Malmo with only a population of over 300,000 of which people from Iraq number just over 11,000 being the 2nd most violent in Europe..

well it clearly isn't based on a cursory look at the Swedish governments own crime stats..

What is your problem? It is you being ignorant. I know the situation more than you and we call it baghdad as a nickname.

Shag, your the one quoting something that can only be based on ignorance or with your track record most likely racism..

there must be some right thick fuckers who call something little baghdad when the number of people from Iraq are less than 1% of the population of that city..

either that or they have an agenda..

therein lies a problem.."

You believe in what you want, this will just go back and forth, we have to agree to disagree.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Wake up smiling every morning these days.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Saudi oil minister Khalid al-Falih welcomes Trump era

Obama bowed before the Saudi King Abdullah...now it's the other way around."

Certainly, Trump can be bought.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Saudi oil minister Khalid al-Falih welcomes Trump era

Obama bowed before the Saudi King Abdullah...now it's the other way around.

Certainly, Trump can be bought."

I doubt that very much, unlike Obama who is now bowing before Richard Branson on the billionaire's private island.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

With silicon valley now not happy on the ban will people worth 10 times more than trump have some power?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"With silicon valley now not happy on the ban will people worth 10 times more than trump have some power?"

Large corporates will be unhappy; they have just lost access to cheap foreign labour. I somehow doubt that a man who can sack the AG on the spot in her heels, gives two hoots about a few wealthy executives in Silicon Valley

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago

North West


"With silicon valley now not happy on the ban will people worth 10 times more than trump have some power?

Large corporates will be unhappy; they have just lost access to cheap foreign labour. I somehow doubt that a man who can sack the AG on the spot in her heels, gives two hoots about a few wealthy executives in Silicon Valley"

Trumps ban has nothing whatsoever to do with cheap Labour. You demean yourself with such an ill informed comment.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *osieWoman
over a year ago

Wembley


"With silicon valley now not happy on the ban will people worth 10 times more than trump have some power?

Large corporates will be unhappy; they have just lost access to cheap foreign labour. I somehow doubt that a man who can sack the AG on the spot in her heels, gives two hoots about a few wealthy executives in Silicon Valley

Trumps ban has nothing whatsoever to do with cheap Labour. You demean yourself with such an ill informed comment."

Silicon Valley executives think differently to you. They have lost access to their cheap foreign labour (lowly paid computer programmers as opposed to highly paid system architects and hardware design engineers)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *imetoexplore69Couple
over a year ago

Aberdeen


"I think he will manufacture a war in the Middle East. It will be good for America right? Good for the Arms trade, somehow he will benefit financially from it.

I think he is being deliberately inflammatory to facilitate an attack on the states so he can start a war."

that is what all the presidents before him have done since the late 80s lol.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top