Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are constantly told that we are the 5th largest economy in the first world yet an independent well respected health care body claims the NHS is in crisis of humanitarian proportions. Something needs to be done." The issue is that since the launch of the NHS in 1948 we have millions more people in the UK, living longer but not always healthier (nearly 1 million with dementia for example) and people now expect a "consumer" style service from our NHS , yeah we need to cut waste, drive efficiency and invest in facilities but the bottom line is we need billions pumped in but when politicians talk about raising taxes we all run a mile ! The other alternative is to incentivise those who CAN / WANT to go private and then focus limited resource on those who cant afford it ..... Raise taxes OR semi privatise .......discuss ..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cut military spending " With the depleted armed services already there isnt much to cut !! And to be frank (not really my name ! Lol) with the world as it is im happy spending money on our military | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are constantly told that we are the 5th largest economy in the first world yet an independent well respected health care body claims the NHS is in crisis of humanitarian proportions. Something needs to be done. The issue is that since the launch of the NHS in 1948 we have millions more people in the UK, living longer but not always healthier (nearly 1 million with dementia for example) and people now expect a "consumer" style service from our NHS , yeah we need to cut waste, drive efficiency and invest in facilities but the bottom line is we need billions pumped in but when politicians talk about raising taxes we all run a mile ! The other alternative is to incentivise those who CAN / WANT to go private and then focus limited resource on those who cant afford it ..... Raise taxes OR semi privatise .......discuss ....." We need more resources to be put into the service. A three year health tax to raise £1.5b per annum to deal with th immediate problems and a full NHS review of delivery. If they can do it in Scandinavia then it can be done here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The issue is that since the launch of the NHS in 1948 we have millions more people in the UK, living longer but not always healthier (nearly 1 million with dementia for example) and people now expect a "consumer" style service from our NHS , yeah we need to cut waste, drive efficiency and invest in facilities but the bottom line is we need billions pumped in but when politicians talk about raising taxes we all run a mile ! The other alternative is to incentivise those who CAN / WANT to go private and then focus limited resource on those who cant afford it ..... Raise taxes OR semi privatise .......discuss ....." No the issue is that since the 80's there has been constant privatisation in the NHS. First we had cleaning staff. The argument was it was not clinical and would not effect health. Of course what seemes to happen was private companies did the job for less and made profit and the tories held it up as a triumph. But the truth is that is not possible. What really happened was cleaning staff were cut, cleaning products used to clean hospitals were reduced or diluted and suddenly bugs that used to be killed by strong bleach were fed weak bleach that they were able to build resistance to and we got superbugs that required specialist NHS deep cleaning teams to constantly battle them! So no real saving there then, but in reality an extra cost, but don't worry privatising hospital cleaning was a success... And now we can have more, lets make the NHS a market open to the lowest bidder... Anyone spot the flaw? Anyone think of a solution? Anyone wonder why we keep going down the same obviously failed path? Could it have anything to do with all the money to be made by tories and their backers in privatising the NHS? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The issue is that since the launch of the NHS in 1948 we have millions more people in the UK, living longer but not always healthier (nearly 1 million with dementia for example) and people now expect a "consumer" style service from our NHS , yeah we need to cut waste, drive efficiency and invest in facilities but the bottom line is we need billions pumped in but when politicians talk about raising taxes we all run a mile ! The other alternative is to incentivise those who CAN / WANT to go private and then focus limited resource on those who cant afford it ..... Raise taxes OR semi privatise .......discuss ..... No the issue is that since the 80's there has been constant privatisation in the NHS. First we had cleaning staff. The argument was it was not clinical and would not effect health. Of course what seemes to happen was private companies did the job for less and made profit and the tories held it up as a triumph. But the truth is that is not possible. What really happened was cleaning staff were cut, cleaning products used to clean hospitals were reduced or diluted and suddenly bugs that used to be killed by strong bleach were fed weak bleach that they were able to build resistance to and we got superbugs that required specialist NHS deep cleaning teams to constantly battle them! So no real saving there then, but in reality an extra cost, but don't worry privatising hospital cleaning was a success... And now we can have more, lets make the NHS a market open to the lowest bidder... Anyone spot the flaw? Anyone think of a solution? Anyone wonder why we keep going down the same obviously failed path? Could it have anything to do with all the money to be made by tories and their backers in privatising the NHS?" Some valid points .... BUT this really is less political and more economic ... Under all the years of LABOUR government with tony blair i seem to have missed all the radical improvements .......? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The issue is that since the launch of the NHS in 1948 we have millions more people in the UK, living longer but not always healthier (nearly 1 million with dementia for example) and people now expect a "consumer" style service from our NHS , yeah we need to cut waste, drive efficiency and invest in facilities but the bottom line is we need billions pumped in but when politicians talk about raising taxes we all run a mile ! The other alternative is to incentivise those who CAN / WANT to go private and then focus limited resource on those who cant afford it ..... Raise taxes OR semi privatise .......discuss ..... No the issue is that since the 80's there has been constant privatisation in the NHS. First we had cleaning staff. The argument was it was not clinical and would not effect health. Of course what seemes to happen was private companies did the job for less and made profit and the tories held it up as a triumph. But the truth is that is not possible. What really happened was cleaning staff were cut, cleaning products used to clean hospitals were reduced or diluted and suddenly bugs that used to be killed by strong bleach were fed weak bleach that they were able to build resistance to and we got superbugs that required specialist NHS deep cleaning teams to constantly battle them! So no real saving there then, but in reality an extra cost, but don't worry privatising hospital cleaning was a success... And now we can have more, lets make the NHS a market open to the lowest bidder... Anyone spot the flaw? Anyone think of a solution? Anyone wonder why we keep going down the same obviously failed path? Could it have anything to do with all the money to be made by tories and their backers in privatising the NHS? Some valid points .... BUT this really is less political and more economic ... Under all the years of LABOUR government with tony blair i seem to have missed all the radical improvements .......?" The scandal at Stafford hospital and many other hospitals happened under a Labour government. It was Blair/Brown who privatised much of the NHS with PFI deals. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Cut military spending " As a full Nato member we are committed to spending a set amount each year on defence. I'd cut the foreign aid budget instead. It's ridiculous that we are giving away money to countries with their own space programmes, and for idiotic frivolities like an Ethiopian version of the Spice Girls and corrupt leaders who pocket much of the cash we give through underhand backroom deals. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |