FabSwingers.com forum: Swedish Jihadists

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

On news night now.

Sweden has taken more Muslim "refugees" per capita than any other country.

Also, per capita, they have provided many more jihadists than any other country. FACT.

Is it a coincidence? Or do you just think "no shit Sherlock?" Should this influence other countries taking in such refugees?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

Of course it is a 'no shit sherlock' moment.

IS have been very open about the fact that they are infiltrating recruiters and fighters into Europe and using refugees as cover for this. Therefore it is logical to expect that the most European jihadists (per capita) would come from the country that takes the most refugees because that is where to most recruiters will have gone.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think we might have to define jihadist.

Are we talking a Muslim upset by western values and going AWOL or are we talking somebody sneaking in who intended from the beginning to commit crimes?.

Personally I think we've got a bit of both, we've got alot of Muslims who've left for no other reason than they can't live where they were, this is a totally different thing than Muslims who would emigrate to western countries because they wished to(bitterness doesn't travel well).

Islamic values don't fit in well with western ones, I think as long as we don't pander to them and lay down our values count over yours there will be far less problems.... However in todays western (pc) world that isn't likely to happen therefore I will expect altercations from both sides!.

I hope we learn to assimilate them the easy way rather than the hard way

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

Jihadists were defined as those:

Going off to fight in Syria/Iraq.

Recruiting others to do this.

Committing or encouraging acts of terrorism.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Jihadists were defined as those:

Going off to fight in Syria/Iraq.

Recruiting others to do this.

Committing or encouraging acts of terrorism."
.

Every thing is AN act of terror, when we bombed Baghdad it terrorised Iraqis, the difference is what you intend from the terrorism..... There really is good terrorism and bad terrorism unfortunately.

You've just got to try and hold firm to what you personally think is good!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

"Every thing is AN act of terror, when we bombed Baghdad it terrorised Iraqis, the difference is what you intend from the terrorism..... There really is good terrorism and bad terrorism unfortunately.

You've just got to try and hold firm to what you personally think is good!"
Everyone uses the terror label when they are attacked, even the NAZI's call RAF and USAF bomber crews 'terror killers', further commandos were also labelled terrorists even though they were always in uniform and only attacked military targets during WW2.

Don't accept the label unquestioningly!

Most 'terror' attacks are acts of asymmetrical war by insurgent forces in the increasingly violent precursors to all out civil war. However when used correctly terrorism refers to 'international terrorism', which is where groups use violence attacks on neutral third parties to promote or publicise their cause.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *anes HubbyCouple
over a year ago

Babbacombe Torquay

I watched the news report in full from Gothenburg, there was no inference from the report that ALL of those Muslims that had returned to Iraq and Syria had gone to join IS, they only suggested they had returned to the region.

Maybe many of the 300 that had left Sweden have returned to families?, there is little way of knowing for sure, but then again it wouldn't have made much of a news story if that were the case.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

To be brutally honest I do not understand why we stop or attempt to stop those who believe they do not owe their allegiance to the UK from going where ever they believe their true allegiance lies. There should be a quick and easy way for anyone to declare their true allegiance, surrender their rights to UK nationality and then be escorted to the exit. If they choose to go fight in a holy war that is up to them, if they find themselves fighting against our troops well they can take their chances like anyone else.

However, I also believe that anyone who surrenders their UK nationality should be placed on a black list and never be allowed to return. You makes your bed...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"To be brutally honest I do not understand why we stop or attempt to stop those who believe they do not owe their allegiance to the UK from going where ever they believe their true allegiance lies. There should be a quick and easy way for anyone to declare their true allegiance, surrender their rights to UK nationality and then be escorted to the exit. If they choose to go fight in a holy war that is up to them, if they find themselves fighting against our troops well they can take their chances like anyone else.

However, I also believe that anyone who surrenders their UK nationality should be placed on a black list and never be allowed to return. You makes your bed... "

Yup totally agree with you on that always said if they want to go then hand thier British passport in on the way out and sign a waiver to all British right and privalage.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The problem is the feminist initiative party, which let them in and did you know, now the police are not allowed to say a immigrant have done a crime, hence why the far right movement in sweden is on the rise, the swedish democrats are gaining popularity and could win it. I hope they do, sweden is a blue print of why feminism is bad for a country and will never work, they need to keep their women in check, like other countrys, for example, in the far east.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

It is no coincidence

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread