FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Corbyn's seat may be abolished

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Before you brand me a leftie which I'm not.

Doesn't it seem everything is going wrong for him. Everyone trying to overthrow him now they are taking his constituent. I feel sorry for him. I'd rather he win or lose fair and square.

Jeremy Corbyn's parliamentary seat 'could be abolished' - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37342828

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *igsteve43Man
over a year ago

derby

Well he could stand in witney now camerons resigned

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock

Just saw it on the news, Jeremy Corbyn, Diane Abbott and Emily Thornberry's seats could all be merged into one constituency. Wonder which two of those 3 will be put out to grass?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I am sure he must feel as you say but in fairness it is an exercise by the Electoral Commission to balance Constituencies and reduce the number of MPs from 655 to 600. The idea is to make each vote count the same and reduce the costs of Parliament.

The democratic issue has been that historically Labour needed fewer votes to get more MPs. This change will balance that unfairness. But already Labour are labelling it a stitch up.

All they need to do after that is get rid of about 400 Lords and Ladies....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I am sure he must feel as you say but in fairness it is an exercise by the Electoral Commission to balance Constituencies and reduce the number of MPs from 655 to 600. The idea is to make each vote count the same and reduce the costs of Parliament.

The democratic issue has been that historically Labour needed fewer votes to get more MPs. This change will balance that unfairness. But already Labour are labelling it a stitch up.

All they need to do after that is get rid of about 400 Lords and Ladies...."

I don't doubt the reason. It's a bit fishy or it's plain old bad luck.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral

It is just part of population movement,my constituency will be merged,at present it is a marginal seat which means my vote counts.

If it goes ahead we will become a labour seat however I vote,it is swings and roundabouts.

There will be plenty of safe lefty seats for Corbyn to fight unfortunately,many in the North West.I wish they would abolish Corbyn but it wont happen

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am sure he must feel as you say but in fairness it is an exercise by the Electoral Commission to balance Constituencies and reduce the number of MPs from 655 to 600. The idea is to make each vote count the same and reduce the costs of Parliament.

The democratic issue has been that historically Labour needed fewer votes to get more MPs. This change will balance that unfairness. But already Labour are labelling it a stitch up.

All they need to do after that is get rid of about 400 Lords and Ladies....

I don't doubt the reason. It's a bit fishy or it's plain old bad luck."

This has been going on for years!! It was talked about in the 2010 elections. A year ago nobody outside the looney left had even heard of Corbyn and the decision would have been planned well back then. Still, it couldn't have happened to a better person.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Well he could stand in witney now camerons resigned "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I am sure he must feel as you say but in fairness it is an exercise by the Electoral Commission to balance Constituencies and reduce the number of MPs from 655 to 600. The idea is to make each vote count the same and reduce the costs of Parliament.

The democratic issue has been that historically Labour needed fewer votes to get more MPs. This change will balance that unfairness. But already Labour are labelling it a stitch up.

All they need to do after that is get rid of about 400 Lords and Ladies....

I don't doubt the reason. It's a bit fishy or it's plain old bad luck.

This has been going on for years!! It was talked about in the 2010 elections. A year ago nobody outside the looney left had even heard of Corbyn and the decision would have been planned well back then. Still, it couldn't have happened to a better person. "

Has anyone else heard of him? Except me. I knew of him 30 years ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am sure he must feel as you say but in fairness it is an exercise by the Electoral Commission to balance Constituencies and reduce the number of MPs from 655 to 600. The idea is to make each vote count the same and reduce the costs of Parliament.

The democratic issue has been that historically Labour needed fewer votes to get more MPs. This change will balance that unfairness. But already Labour are labelling it a stitch up.

All they need to do after that is get rid of about 400 Lords and Ladies....

I don't doubt the reason. It's a bit fishy or it's plain old bad luck.

This has been going on for years!! It was talked about in the 2010 elections. A year ago nobody outside the looney left had even heard of Corbyn and the decision would have been planned well back then. Still, it couldn't have happened to a better person.

Has anyone else heard of him? Except me. I knew of him 30 years ago. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

He would get another seat .

That's if he isn't in the House Of Lords By Then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He would get another seat .

That's if he isn't in the House Of Lords By Then "

or on a train

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He would get another seat .

That's if he isn't in the House Of Lords By Then

or on a train "

Or a Tandem

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top