Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl!" What makes you dislike him that much? He just seems like the majority of politicians to me? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl!" Chukka's been pretty quiet since the result of the EU referendum.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl!" are you saying you disagree with him that most people are trash | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What planet you been on Centaur.....he has been all over the place ranting about false promises and demanding a re-run. At it again today." He may have been today, but before today I've honestly not seen much of him since the result of the referendum. I think he had gone into shock for several weeks after June 23rd. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl!" Ironically he's one of the better labour politicians. Although that tells you more about the average than it does him. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And now one total slime ball is favourite to replace another as Keith Vaz has stepped down, leaving Chukka as favourite!" Which raises a question...why did he decide to stand for the Labour leadership and then withdraw? Word was the Press had something on him last year so not sure if frying pans and fire are appropriate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl! Ironically he's one of the better labour politicians. Although that tells you more about the average than it does him. " Is he? Don't tell Labour Party members that.He couldn't produce a policy if you sat him down for five years; he is image without substance. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl! Ironically he's one of the better labour politicians. Although that tells you more about the average than it does him. Is he? Don't tell Labour Party members that.He couldn't produce a policy if you sat him down for five years; he is image without substance." Yes, those are my favourite types of politicians. The inconvenient truth is that our country is very rich and well developed. We have a lot of first world problems that require incremental, tinkering change. The only dangerous people are the radicals that want to reduce us back to the poverty levels that all the countries who experimented with radical politics enjoy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl! Ironically he's one of the better labour politicians. Although that tells you more about the average than it does him. Is he? Don't tell Labour Party members that.He couldn't produce a policy if you sat him down for five years; he is image without substance. Yes, those are my favourite types of politicians. The inconvenient truth is that our country is very rich and well developed. We have a lot of first world problems that require incremental, tinkering change. The only dangerous people are the radicals that want to reduce us back to the poverty levels that all the countries who experimented with radical politics enjoy. " The most radical governments this country has had were the Asquith Liberal Government, the Atlee Government and Thatcher's; one of each variety and who have shaped how we have become this first world nation. Wishing away radicalism would lose you all three of them and what they did, so are radicals sometimes good? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl! Ironically he's one of the better labour politicians. Although that tells you more about the average than it does him. Is he? Don't tell Labour Party members that.He couldn't produce a policy if you sat him down for five years; he is image without substance. Yes, those are my favourite types of politicians. The inconvenient truth is that our country is very rich and well developed. We have a lot of first world problems that require incremental, tinkering change. The only dangerous people are the radicals that want to reduce us back to the poverty levels that all the countries who experimented with radical politics enjoy. The most radical governments this country has had were the Asquith Liberal Government, the Atlee Government and Thatcher's; one of each variety and who have shaped how we have become this first world nation. Wishing away radicalism would lose you all three of them and what they did, so are radicals sometimes good?" I wouldn't see thatcher as radical. If you look at 120 years of economic data for the UK, the 1970's are by far the worst economic clusterfuck outside of wartime. That's as close as the UK ever comes to looney left policies and that was the Heath and Callaghan governments. I don't believe Thatcher would have been elected if it weren't for that. In statistics she is what we call 'regression to the mean'. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl!" Agrees completely . A rich slime ball . Hopes he will be deselected as an mp and sent to work. does he still bank in the camon islands ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl! Ironically he's one of the better labour politicians. Although that tells you more about the average than it does him. Is he? Don't tell Labour Party members that.He couldn't produce a policy if you sat him down for five years; he is image without substance. Yes, those are my favourite types of politicians. The inconvenient truth is that our country is very rich and well developed. We have a lot of first world problems that require incremental, tinkering change. The only dangerous people are the radicals that want to reduce us back to the poverty levels that all the countries who experimented with radical politics enjoy. The most radical governments this country has had were the Asquith Liberal Government, the Atlee Government and Thatcher's; one of each variety and who have shaped how we have become this first world nation. Wishing away radicalism would lose you all three of them and what they did, so are radicals sometimes good? I wouldn't see thatcher as radical. If you look at 120 years of economic data for the UK, the 1970's are by far the worst economic clusterfuck outside of wartime. That's as close as the UK ever comes to looney left policies and that was the Heath and Callaghan governments. I don't believe Thatcher would have been elected if it weren't for that. In statistics she is what we call 'regression to the mean'. " The 70s were a disaster (you missed Wilson btw) and Thatcher was elected as a radical alternative to what had gone before; she achieved some radical changes to our society, so no not the mean...Mean yes but not the mean. Heath and Callaghan were not looney left, merely not in control. Strange but the Atlee Government were elected on a far more left wing manifesto than any Labour Party since.Chukka would not have fitted in, in 1945 but would have with Blair and Brown.Radical is not imho a bad badge to wear. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Looks like Corbyn has finally decided to grow a pair where the EU is concerned and is showing his true eurosceptic colours which he has been well known for, for decades. Just a pity he didn't grow a pair and tell Chukka where to go before the referendum. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What a slimy sycophantic turd that man is! Just seen him on daily politics......makes your skin crawl! Ironically he's one of the better labour politicians. Although that tells you more about the average than it does him. Is he? Don't tell Labour Party members that.He couldn't produce a policy if you sat him down for five years; he is image without substance. Yes, those are my favourite types of politicians. The inconvenient truth is that our country is very rich and well developed. We have a lot of first world problems that require incremental, tinkering change. The only dangerous people are the radicals that want to reduce us back to the poverty levels that all the countries who experimented with radical politics enjoy. The most radical governments this country has had were the Asquith Liberal Government, the Atlee Government and Thatcher's; one of each variety and who have shaped how we have become this first world nation. Wishing away radicalism would lose you all three of them and what they did, so are radicals sometimes good? I wouldn't see thatcher as radical. If you look at 120 years of economic data for the UK, the 1970's are by far the worst economic clusterfuck outside of wartime. That's as close as the UK ever comes to looney left policies and that was the Heath and Callaghan governments. I don't believe Thatcher would have been elected if it weren't for that. In statistics she is what we call 'regression to the mean'. The 70s were a disaster (you missed Wilson btw) and Thatcher was elected as a radical alternative to what had gone before; she achieved some radical changes to our society, so no not the mean...Mean yes but not the mean. Heath and Callaghan were not looney left, merely not in control. Strange but the Atlee Government were elected on a far more left wing manifesto than any Labour Party since.Chukka would not have fitted in, in 1945 but would have with Blair and Brown.Radical is not imho a bad badge to wear." Left wing movements always start out well and then get hijacked if they achieve anything. Hence the law of unintended consequences. Yes the 70's were truly the shittest peace time decade of the 20th century. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
