FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

If we all stopped

Jump to newest
 

By *odareyou OP   Man
over a year ago

not far from iceland,,,,,, tescos is nearer though :-) (near leeds)

Drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes and driving cars.. it seems successive governments want this..

Where will the revenue (tax approx 43billion) come from to fund the services we enjoy and use.

What would you tax that isn't at present

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uzy444Woman
over a year ago

in the suffolk countryside


"Drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes and driving cars.. it seems successive governments want this..

Where will the revenue (tax approx 43billion) come from to fund the services we enjoy and use.

What would you tax that isn't at present "
people wanting to become politicians

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

Watch Yes, Prime Minister, The Smoke Screen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AdVfv6ki54

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I only do 1 of the 3

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

closing the loopholes would make sense and create more revenue than that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mmabluTV/TS
over a year ago

upton wirral


"closing the loopholes would make sense and create more revenue than that."
In the global market it is not possible but governments will try and fail,multi nationals are more powerfull than governments

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes and driving cars.. it seems successive governments want this..

Where will the revenue (tax approx 43billion) come from to fund the services we enjoy and use.

What would you tax that isn't at present "

That's an economic fallacy based on zero sum economic assumptions.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes and driving cars.. it seems successive governments want this..

Where will the revenue (tax approx 43billion) come from to fund the services we enjoy and use.

What would you tax that isn't at present "

If everyone stopped smoking, kept drinking to a glass of wine on a weekend, tried to exercise more, imagine the reduced strain on the NHS.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes and driving cars.. it seems successive governments want this..

Where will the revenue (tax approx 43billion) come from to fund the services we enjoy and use.

What would you tax that isn't at present

If everyone stopped smoking, kept drinking to a glass of wine on a weekend, tried to exercise more, imagine the reduced strain on the NHS."

what, if we all lived longer? There would be greater strain on the NHS without the benefit of the taxes raised

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston


"If everyone stopped smoking, kept drinking to a glass of wine on a weekend, tried to exercise more, imagine the reduced strain on the NHS."

There would be no reduction, all that would happen is that the strain caused by alcohol and motor related trauma, and end of life illnesses would be moved to a different part of the NHS.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes and driving cars.. it seems successive governments want this..

Where will the revenue (tax approx 43billion) come from to fund the services we enjoy and use.

What would you tax that isn't at present "

If we did that the government would have to tax breathing and sex No wait politicians talk too much and aherm fuck too much... but then they would make themselves exempt probably...

On a serious note I agree with the comment that the NHS would not need as much funding if we were all healthier but that would take time

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would tax the wealthy and very rich people with a higher rate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes and driving cars.. it seems successive governments want this..

Where will the revenue (tax approx 43billion) come from to fund the services we enjoy and use.

What would you tax that isn't at present "

I will consider this as I enjoy a glass or two of wine

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top