
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
| Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? " Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory." Lucy Connolly ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He appeals and promotes himself to a certain percentage of people in the country who fail to recognise that the hatred driving their behaviour is no different from the groups or people they go up against. His News Night interview was a car crash and showed him to be exactly who he is. " That why Zack a lefty, lefties always restores to violence. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory. Lucy Connolly ?" Met the threshold. It really isn't more complicated than that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory. Lucy Connolly ? Met the threshold. It really isn't more complicated than that." FB post that’s removed. The leader of a political party inciting murder. Think the threshold and bit of a joke. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory. Lucy Connolly ? Met the threshold. It really isn't more complicated than that. FB post that’s removed. The leader of a political party inciting murder. Think the threshold and bit of a joke. " The police are always recruiting... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory. Lucy Connolly ? Met the threshold. It really isn't more complicated than that." He met my threshold for being exposed as someone who can't take personal responsibility under any circumstance and reverting to whataboutery to dilute his own actions. I was relatively neutral, but my opinion was changing due to some of his comments, however after this episode I wouldn't give him the time of day. Hopefully that feeling is echoed across the country, I don't want him anywhere near decision making in this country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory. Lucy Connolly ? Met the threshold. It really isn't more complicated than that. He met my threshold for being exposed as someone who can't take personal responsibility under any circumstance and reverting to whataboutery to dilute his own actions. I was relatively neutral, but my opinion was changing due to some of his comments, however after this episode I wouldn't give him the time of day. Hopefully that feeling is echoed across the country, I don't want him anywhere near decision making in this country. " Neither do I really, but he just joins a long list of fringe idiots that includes Farage and Lowe. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory. Lucy Connolly ? Met the threshold. It really isn't more complicated than that. He met my threshold for being exposed as someone who can't take personal responsibility under any circumstance and reverting to whataboutery to dilute his own actions. I was relatively neutral, but my opinion was changing due to some of his comments, however after this episode I wouldn't give him the time of day. Hopefully that feeling is echoed across the country, I don't want him anywhere near decision making in this country. Neither do I really, but he just joins a long list of fringe idiots that includes Farage and Lowe." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory. Lucy Connolly ? Met the threshold. It really isn't more complicated than that. FB post that’s removed. The leader of a political party inciting murder. Think the threshold and bit of a joke. The police are always recruiting..." It’s the CBS that set the guidelines not the police. Keep up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory. Lucy Connolly ? Met the threshold. It really isn't more complicated than that. FB post that’s removed. The leader of a political party inciting murder. Think the threshold and bit of a joke. The police are always recruiting... It’s the CBS that set the guidelines not the police. Keep up. " CPS. They decide whether to charge, not whether or not an offence has been committed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reviews Evidence: Examines case files and evidence gathered by the police.Decides on Charges: Decides if a case meets the legal test for a realistic chance of conviction and is in the public interest.Conducts Court Prosecutions: Presents the case and argues it before a judge, jury, or magistrates." Yeah, you missed the point. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reviews Evidence: Examines case files and evidence gathered by the police.Decides on Charges: Decides if a case meets the legal test for a realistic chance of conviction and is in the public interest.Conducts Court Prosecutions: Presents the case and argues it before a judge, jury, or magistrates. Yeah, you missed the point." Is that the two tier point? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Neither do I really, but he just joins a long list of fringe idiots that includes Farage and Lowe." With Reform's voting numbers I'm not sure you can call Farage "fringe" any more, but I get your point. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Neither do I really, but he just joins a long list of fringe idiots that includes Farage and Lowe. With Reform's voting numbers I'm not sure you can call Farage "fringe" any more, but I get your point." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? Didn't reach the threshold for a crime, seems fairly self-explanatory. Lucy Connolly ? Met the threshold. It really isn't more complicated than that. He met my threshold for being exposed as someone who can't take personal responsibility under any circumstance and reverting to whataboutery to dilute his own actions. I was relatively neutral, but my opinion was changing due to some of his comments, however after this episode I wouldn't give him the time of day. Hopefully that feeling is echoed across the country, I don't want him anywhere near decision making in this country. " 👍he’s not a good ambassador for what was a party for well meaning climate and animal welfare policies | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...I don't want him anywhere near decision making in this country. Neither do I really, but he just joins a long list of fringe idiots that includes Farage and Lowe." This. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The justice system is vastly overloaded and very expensive. Reform have been incredibly active in trying to deflect attention away from their behaviour and funding, that they don't want fuller investigations and attention put on, to a far greater extent than this, so perhaps other parties are being guided by them? " That sounds just like Polanski, blame everyone other than himself for his actions.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The lefties will love he's got away with it all 2% of them.while the rest of us no it's a 2 tier system " What has he got away with? And what do you think is an appropriate punishment for the supposed crime? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The justice system is vastly overloaded and very expensive. Reform have been incredibly active in trying to deflect attention away from their behaviour and funding, that they don't want fuller investigations and attention put on, to a far greater extent than this, so perhaps other parties are being guided by them? That sounds just like Polanski, blame everyone other than himself for his actions.." Par for the course unfortunately. Sounds like every politician we can think of 😏 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The justice system is vastly overloaded and very expensive. Reform have been incredibly active in trying to deflect attention away from their behaviour and funding, that they don't want fuller investigations and attention put on, to a far greater extent than this, so perhaps other parties are being guided by them? That sounds just like Polanski, blame everyone other than himself for his actions.. Par for the course unfortunately. Sounds like every politician we can think of 😏" It does, and it gets replayed as original thought | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The justice system is vastly overloaded and very expensive. Reform have been incredibly active in trying to deflect attention away from their behaviour and funding, that they don't want fuller investigations and attention put on, to a far greater extent than this, so perhaps other parties are being guided by them? That sounds just like Polanski, blame everyone other than himself for his actions.. Par for the course unfortunately. Sounds like every politician we can think of 😏 It does, and it gets replayed as original thought " Hardly an original thought when the majority of the UK voting population think the same 😏 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The lefties will love he's got away with it all 2% of them.while the rest of us no it's a 2 tier system What has he got away with? And what do you think is an appropriate punishment for the supposed crime?" hate speech that's what he's got away with if Lucy connelly can go to jail over a post why can't he.oh wait cause it's 2 tier as per always sticking up for the lefties. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? " No crime, no charges. It’s really not that difficult to understand. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did he say that the national debt belonged to the people and therefore the people could write it off....without considering that the debt consisted of Government bonds an that such action would stifle inward investment along with crippling numerous pension funds and private investments (and we're not just talking about the rich...it's yours and mine when looking at financing markets unless you have no investmentor pension products). The lack of investment would cripple growth of the economy. Or will someone tell me that he has 'u turned' on that pledge?" Do you really think that a guy who promised boob enlargement with h*pnosis understands these things? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did he say that the national debt belonged to the people and therefore the people could write it off....without considering that the debt consisted of Government bonds an that such action would stifle inward investment along with crippling numerous pension funds and private investments (and we're not just talking about the rich...it's yours and mine when looking at financing markets unless you have no investmentor pension products). The lack of investment would cripple growth of the economy. Or will someone tell me that he has 'u turned' on that pledge? Do you really think that a guy who promised boob enlargement with h*pnosis understands these things? Why is that not the red flag it needs to be | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did he say that the national debt belonged to the people and therefore the people could write it off....without considering that the debt consisted of Government bonds an that such action would stifle inward investment along with crippling numerous pension funds and private investments (and we're not just talking about the rich...it's yours and mine when looking at financing markets unless you have no investmentor pension products). The lack of investment would cripple growth of the economy. Or will someone tell me that he has 'u turned' on that pledge? Do you really think that a guy who promised boob enlargement with h*pnosis understands these things? Exactly! I know of some people who look down upon other voters as intellectually inferior, uneducated, etc go on to support this tit whisperer. Their complete lack of self awareness blows my mind | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Did he say that the national debt belonged to the people and therefore the people could write it off....without considering that the debt consisted of Government bonds an that such action would stifle inward investment along with crippling numerous pension funds and private investments (and we're not just talking about the rich...it's yours and mine when looking at financing markets unless you have no investmentor pension products). The lack of investment would cripple growth of the economy. Or will someone tell me that he has 'u turned' on that pledge? Do you really think that a guy who promised boob enlargement with h*pnosis understands these things? Just because people vote one way or another in a referendum or choose to vote for a ‘populist’ party does not make them stupid. It’s more an indicator of how seriously angry and pissed off they are with ‘mainstream’ politicians who continually fail to make any meaningful positive difference to their lives. This feeling of alienation from ‘mainstream’ politics can be traced back, I would argue, to the MP expenses scandal in 2009, the global 2008/09 financial crisis and its subsequent fallout. The EU referendum result was a giant “f**k you” to the establishment. Since then things have gone a bit batshit. How to fix it? I have no idea. But a good place to begin would be to start listening to rather than shouting at each other. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? " If it's not chargeable then we have no choice but to accept that. However he was given several chances to apologise in the BBC interview and declined. Why couldn't he bring himself to simply say sorry for any distress caused. The fact he did not deliberately do this (according to him) should not prevent him from apologising. In the wake of the Ann Widdecombe murdering would have hoped for far more care and if things do go wrong, an apology. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The grifter not to face any charges from police investigating. Peoples thoughts? If it's not chargeable then we have no choice but to accept that. However he was given several chances to apologise in the BBC interview and declined. Why couldn't he bring himself to simply say sorry for any distress caused. The fact he did not deliberately do this (according to him) should not prevent him from apologising. In the wake of the Ann Widdecombe murdering would have hoped for far more care and if things do go wrong, an apology. " Totally agree. He should have apologised. These are volatile times. Two MPs and one former MP (but still politically active woman) murdered in cold blood since 2016. Polanski should have read the room. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perfectly fine, he has been investigated and found innocent. If only the actual grifters got charged. The only grifters are reform Ltd and their brexshit hell they are profiting off us. " How do you feel about Polanski not offering an apology for his mistake? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People comparing the Lucy Connelly incident and this are missing a crucial point. Lucy Connelly actually wrote the words on her post. While i believe Zak Polanski shared someone else's post. If we start charging and locking up people for sharing offensive post, we will need to start finding new penal colonies. " Spot on. Online political “discussion” “debate” is largely characterised by volatile swarms and high emotions, frenetic cycles of outrage and witch hunts. Each political tribe raging and hurling insults at each other….”traitors”, “betrayal”…….It’s almost impossible to have calm, reasoned, respectful debate. I actually think that the Fab forums are one of the better online spaces to engage in political debate. Less performative outrage on here. That’s my experience so far at least. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People comparing the Lucy Connelly incident and this are missing a crucial point. Lucy Connelly actually wrote the words on her post. While i believe Zak Polanski shared someone else's post. If we start charging and locking up people for sharing offensive post, we will need to start finding new penal colonies. " I agree the two cases are fundamentally different. I do think Polanski should apologise for sharing something he says he hadn't properly reviewed which has clearly caused offence to some, and I think it shows a carelessness that indicates he's not ready for public office. I also think Farage should apologise for his words after the Henry Nowak trial which actually played a part in starting riots, he would say that he didn't incite violence deliberately and maybe he didn't mean to but he should understand that his words have consequences and if he doesn't then he's also not fit for public office. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People comparing the Lucy Connelly incident and this are missing a crucial point. Lucy Connelly actually wrote the words on her post. While i believe Zak Polanski shared someone else's post. If we start charging and locking up people for sharing offensive post, we will need to start finding new penal colonies. I agree the two cases are fundamentally different. I do think Polanski should apologise for sharing something he says he hadn't properly reviewed which has clearly caused offence to some, and I think it shows a carelessness that indicates he's not ready for public office. I also think Farage should apologise for his words after the Henry Nowak trial which actually played a part in starting riots, he would say that he didn't incite violence deliberately and maybe he didn't mean to but he should understand that his words have consequences and if he doesn't then he's also not fit for public office. " You say it indicates Polanski is not ready for office, yet you caveat Farage’s fitness. Why is that? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People comparing the Lucy Connelly incident and this are missing a crucial point. Lucy Connelly actually wrote the words on her post. While i believe Zak Polanski shared someone else's post. If we start charging and locking up people for sharing offensive post, we will need to start finding new penal colonies. I agree the two cases are fundamentally different. I do think Polanski should apologise for sharing something he says he hadn't properly reviewed which has clearly caused offence to some, and I think it shows a carelessness that indicates he's not ready for public office. I also think Farage should apologise for his words after the Henry Nowak trial which actually played a part in starting riots, he would say that he didn't incite violence deliberately and maybe he didn't mean to but he should understand that his words have consequences and if he doesn't then he's also not fit for public office. You say it indicates Polanski is not ready for office, yet you caveat Farage’s fitness. Why is that?" I think neither are fit for office. Polanski's only been in politics for about 10 years and only a bigger player for the last couple so he might yet learn, but his actions and reactions have come across to me as a little immature. Farage is a career politician and given his 30 odd years in politics, most as a senior figure in his parties almost certainly knows what he's saying and the consequences of those words, in which case he isn't fit for office. But in the unlikely event he doesn't understand the consequences then he's also not fit for office. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People comparing the Lucy Connelly incident and this are missing a crucial point. Lucy Connelly actually wrote the words on her post. While i believe Zak Polanski shared someone else's post. If we start charging and locking up people for sharing offensive post, we will need to start finding new penal colonies. I agree the two cases are fundamentally different. I do think Polanski should apologise for sharing something he says he hadn't properly reviewed which has clearly caused offence to some, and I think it shows a carelessness that indicates he's not ready for public office. I also think Farage should apologise for his words after the Henry Nowak trial which actually played a part in starting riots, he would say that he didn't incite violence deliberately and maybe he didn't mean to but he should understand that his words have consequences and if he doesn't then he's also not fit for public office. You say it indicates Polanski is not ready for office, yet you caveat Farage’s fitness. Why is that? I think neither are fit for office. Polanski's only been in politics for about 10 years and only a bigger player for the last couple so he might yet learn, but his actions and reactions have come across to me as a little immature. Farage is a career politician and given his 30 odd years in politics, most as a senior figure in his parties almost certainly knows what he's saying and the consequences of those words, in which case he isn't fit for office. But in the unlikely event he doesn't understand the consequences then he's also not fit for office. " Thank you for explaining. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lefties are wishy washy who don't do violence. Haven't you read the far right scripts of the past. Same old crap from the far right, on another day. The right get people killed, World wars for instance started by the right. " You really are on a wind up . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |