Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone see it? If not here's the breakdown of the broadcast. - Four Typhoon jets to be sent over to Qatar - First charter flight has taken off from Oman - Starmer defends not joining the initial strikes - Starmers focus is on calm, level headed leadership - Starmers Priority is protecting our people Give it another week or 2 and we'll be at war on the offensive. What are your thoughts?" What would you have done differently given the choice? Genuine question, interested to know. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer's top priority is written on a revolving door. I'd rather he stopped declaring what his top priority is. He's like a windsock in the hurricane of public opinion." Priorities change, usually affected on a daily basis by what the obnoxious orange cunt does | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer's top priority is written on a revolving door. I'd rather he stopped declaring what his top priority is. He's like a windsock in the hurricane of public opinion." Haha, so true 🤣🤣 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer's top priority is written on a revolving door. I'd rather he stopped declaring what his top priority is. He's like a windsock in the hurricane of public opinion." We might be being better informed than our US citizens. I'd prefer to know what is going on. The US messages have been conflicting and not comprehensive. I don't think we've done too badly and it's right that we've not rolled over and let Trump use us,as he wants to | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sensible, calm and measured. And a good leader should be able to pivot 180 degrees on anything, if the need arises. Whilst I am happy with what we have now, if we need to pivot, we pivot." Partially agree. A better leader reads the situation and sees the obvious and preempts or prevents it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Secretary Marco Rubio on the UK current government. “We have stopped sharing much of the intelligence with the British government because we no longer find them trustworthy.” Also revealed today that US asked to use British bases six weeks ago, disproving claim that Starmer was reacting to events by refusing use. 80 years of friendship and alliance down the drain to please the voters who have already switched to the Greens.🤦♂️" So you'd be happy with Starmer allowing thenuse of our bases for offensive attacks? Therefore getting us MORE involved in what's happening! The UK as a whole wants to stay out of this and I'm happy with what he's doing. He's not bending over backwards for Trump regardless of how Trump feels. Trumps already cut ties from Spain. What's to say he won't cut ties with us? Trump is an idiotic criminal and nobody can see it! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Secretary Marco Rubio on the UK current government. “We have stopped sharing much of the intelligence with the British government because we no longer find them trustworthy.” " The same Rubio who admitted that the ‘imminent threat’ claim was based upon the fact that they knew Isreal were about to attack Iran first and it would be retaliatory? With friends like that… | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Canada, Germany, Australia, France all backing the US/Israeli attacks, three of those with leftish Govts. Huge anger reported from the Gulf States. "Jordan was ‘fucking furious’, a former minister with friends in Amman says. ‘The Emiratis, Kuwaitis, and even the Canadians are all asking, “What the fuck are you doing? Whose side are you on?”’ The Emiratis pointed out that Britain was failing to help protect the 240,000 British citizens living in Dubai and Abu Dhabi."" Didn’t Macron question the legality of the strikes like 2 day ago? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Canada, Germany, Australia, France all backing the US/Israeli attacks, three of those with leftish Govts. Huge anger reported from the Gulf States. "Jordan was ‘fucking furious’, a former minister with friends in Amman says. ‘The Emiratis, Kuwaitis, and even the Canadians are all asking, “What the fuck are you doing? Whose side are you on?”’ The Emiratis pointed out that Britain was failing to help protect the 240,000 British citizens living in Dubai and Abu Dhabi."" Other countries won't have the responsibilities nor capabilities that we have. It's fine for us to do what we think is right. Failing to submit to Trump's demands isn't doing anything other than asserting our sovereignty. I think that the US will view many things that Trump does as wrong in the future and it's good for us not to join him, when we see other choices as right. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Canada, Germany, Australia, France all backing the US/Israeli attacks, three of those with leftish Govts. Huge anger reported from the Gulf States. "Jordan was ‘fucking furious’, a former minister with friends in Amman says. ‘The Emiratis, Kuwaitis, and even the Canadians are all asking, “What the fuck are you doing? Whose side are you on?”’ The Emiratis pointed out that Britain was failing to help protect the 240,000 British citizens living in Dubai and Abu Dhabi." Other countries won't have the responsibilities nor capabilities that we have. It's fine for us to do what we think is right. Failing to submit to Trump's demands isn't doing anything other than asserting our sovereignty. I think that the US will view many things that Trump does as wrong in the future and it's good for us not to join him, when we see other choices as right." The criticisms of Starmer by Cyprus and Gulf states are not to do with his support for US, they are about the failure to protect British citizens. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Canada, Germany, Australia, France all backing the US/Israeli attacks, three of those with leftish Govts. Huge anger reported from the Gulf States. "Jordan was ‘fucking furious’, a former minister with friends in Amman says. ‘The Emiratis, Kuwaitis, and even the Canadians are all asking, “What the fuck are you doing? Whose side are you on?”’ The Emiratis pointed out that Britain was failing to help protect the 240,000 British citizens living in Dubai and Abu Dhabi." Other countries won't have the responsibilities nor capabilities that we have. It's fine for us to do what we think is right. Failing to submit to Trump's demands isn't doing anything other than asserting our sovereignty. I think that the US will view many things that Trump does as wrong in the future and it's good for us not to join him, when we see other choices as right. The criticisms of Starmer by Cyprus and Gulf states are not to do with his support for US, they are about the failure to protect British citizens." British citizens put in danger by the actions of the tangerine turkey | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Anyone see it? If not here's the breakdown of the broadcast. - Four Typhoon jets to be sent over to Qatar - First charter flight has taken off from Oman - Starmer defends not joining the initial strikes - Starmers focus is on calm, level headed leadership - Starmers Priority is protecting our people Give it another week or 2 and we'll be at war on the offensive. What are your thoughts?" Starmer a weak leader, only time he gets hard is talking to a rent boy . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh Christ, the idiot Lammy has got involved saying Britain could join air attacks. Downing St desperately trying to backpeddle now. 🤣🤣" Lammy probably meant air strikes on America | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh Christ, the idiot Lammy has got involved saying Britain could join air attacks. Downing St desperately trying to backpeddle now. 🤣🤣 Lammy probably meant air strikes on America " Haha ! 🤣 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer is a lame duck PM and is shit scared of his back benchers, of losing the muslim vote and of the unions. Hence the inaction regarding Iran and the disastrous economic policies which reward those who can’t be bothered to work." So dam right, he certainly isn’t interested in alarm clock Britain or anybody who doesn’t work for the over manned inefficient NHS, or any of the large unionised work forces. As for our military he should hang his head in shame, that twat would sell his own mother for his beloved left wing legal views | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" As for our military he should hang his head in shame" Why? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" As for our military he should hang his head in shame, that twat would sell his own mother for his beloved left wing legal views" Why? What's he done here ? Which left wing legal views have particularly upset the military? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" As for our military he should hang his head in shame, that twat would sell his own mother for his beloved left wing legal views Why? What's he done here ? Which left wing legal views have particularly upset the military?" Is it possibly prosecuting them for carrying out their duties decades ago? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer is a lame duck PM and is shit scared of his back benchers, of losing the muslim vote and of the unions. Hence the inaction regarding Iran and the disastrous economic policies which reward those who can’t be bothered to work. So dam right, he certainly isn’t interested in alarm clock Britain or anybody who doesn’t work for the over manned inefficient NHS, or any of the large unionised work forces. As for our military he should hang his head in shame, that twat would sell his own mother for his beloved left wing legal views" So is it fair to say you voted Tory through the austerity years ? The years they spent downgrading the armed forces I mean | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer should look after the uk first , How many Iranian men of fighting age , are languishing in hotels paid by taxpayer , in the guise of asylum seekers , the enemy are within " How many ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" As for our military he should hang his head in shame, that twat would sell his own mother for his beloved left wing legal views Why? What's he done here ? Which left wing legal views have particularly upset the military? Is it possibly prosecuting them for carrying out their duties decades ago?" I'm not being prosecuted nor are any of my mates who served.. As aren't the overwhelming majority.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"lol,,, Lammy the village idiot" He also said Cyprus was a NATO member 🤣🤣🤣🤣 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shouldn’t be prosecuted for following orders. Of course there’s no way of knowing what actual orders were on the ground on the day in front line situations " If the order is unlawful and the soldier etc knows that and the comply then they are leaving themselves open to the same potential consequence as the oic.. The 'laws' in relation to such things plus the in theatre rules of engagement are drummed in to all ranks.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shouldn’t be prosecuted for following orders. Of course there’s no way of knowing what actual orders were on the ground on the day in front line situations If the order is unlawful and the soldier etc knows that and the comply then they are leaving themselves open to the same potential consequence as the oic.. The 'laws' in relation to such things plus the in theatre rules of engagement are drummed in to all ranks.." The person giving the orders should be the one prosecuted, if anyone. I should imagine if bullets are flying over your head you don’t have time to get the UN guide to legal military orders out your back pack. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
