FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

el-Fattah

Jump to newest
 

By *arakiss12 OP   TV/TS
18 weeks ago

Bedfuck

So this dingaling expects to return to UK with a verbal apology for posting hate and death threats on social media.

I don't buy it. It's sly and perpetuates the evil he stands for.

Keep him out he doesn't deserve to return.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *resesse_MelioremCouple
18 weeks ago

Border of London


"So this dingaling expects to return to UK with a verbal apology for posting hate and death threats on social media.

I don't buy it. It's sly and perpetuates the evil he stands for.

Keep him out he doesn't deserve to return."

Too late.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ingdomNightTimePleasuresMan
18 weeks ago

nearby


"So this dingaling expects to return to UK with a verbal apology for posting hate and death threats on social media.

I don't buy it. It's sly and perpetuates the evil he stands for.

Keep him out he doesn't deserve to return.

Too late."

Never too late for a U turn

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
18 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"So this dingaling expects to return to UK with a verbal apology for posting hate and death threats on social media.

I don't buy it. It's sly and perpetuates the evil he stands for.

Keep him out he doesn't deserve to return.

Too late.

Never too late for a U turn "

Not now, the damage is done and there is no way back that wont cost the tax payer millions in legal fees to end up with a negative outcome.

The PM going online to welcome him, is the own goal.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
18 weeks ago

His wholr family are anti semitic fruitcakes, his sister was on Twitter celebrating Oct 7th.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ookingFor.....Man
18 weeks ago

Horsham/Crawley

You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *roadShoulderzMan
18 weeks ago

Petersfield


"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…

"

Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.

That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.

Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wosmilersCouple
18 weeks ago

Heathrowish


"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…

Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.

That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.

Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case."

Did she specifically say children?

Not that calling for any person to be burnt is anything short of abhorrent but I cannot recall her stating children specifically.

It is important to differentiate between fact and spin.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ortyairCouple
18 weeks ago

Wallasey


"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…

Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.

That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.

Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case.

Did she specifically say children?

Not that calling for any person to be burnt is anything short of abhorrent but I cannot recall her stating children specifically.

It is important to differentiate between fact and spin."

I dont think her tweet mentioned children, Mrs x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12 OP   TV/TS
18 weeks ago

Bedfuck

Looks like they are reviewing the situation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ingdomNightTimePleasuresMan
18 weeks ago

nearby


"Looks like they are reviewing the situation.

"

U turn coming. Blame the advisers for lack of due diligence.

Farmers iht, pensioners WF, disabled, probable ZEM postponement. Not insignificant exodus of landlords and rising section 21 evictions so possibly unpicking of renter reform and some taxes

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hrill CollinsMan
18 weeks ago

The Outer Rim


"Looks like they are reviewing the situation.

U turn coming. Blame the advisers for lack of due diligence.

Farmers iht, pensioners WF, disabled, probable ZEM postponement. Not insignificant exodus of landlords and rising section 21 evictions so possibly unpicking of renter reform and some taxes "

u turn? .... not possible considering priti patel granted the bloke citizenship while boris johnson was in charge ..... that was 3 tory prime ministers ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otlovefun42Couple
18 weeks ago

Costa Blanca Spain...


"Looks like they are reviewing the situation.

"

Reviewing translates as kicking the can down the road.

The review will conclude either 6 weeks next bank holiday Tuesday or the day after Egypt cancels his passport.

Whichever comes first.

Get used to it. Britain is stuck with this evil twat and his scumbag family.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *roadShoulderzMan
18 weeks ago

Petersfield


"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…

Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.

That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.

Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case.

Did she specifically say children?

Not that calling for any person to be burnt is anything short of abhorrent but I cannot recall her stating children specifically.

It is important to differentiate between fact and spin."

I take a different view in that those she wanted to set fire to included children. They are about 20% of those asylum seekers in hotels she wanted burnt to death.

She would have known that when she made her Tweets.

It's astonishing that Reform has promoted this vile child minder as some sort of political hero.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *CExeCouple
18 weeks ago

Hong-Kong/Exeter


"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…

Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.

That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.

Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case."

Wes Streeting posted violent tweets calling for Jan Moir to be killed, yet he's in the running to take over from Starmer. The point being made in the comment you replied to is that the left are held to different standards.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wosmilersCouple
18 weeks ago

Heathrowish


"You can anything you want as long you apologise, say it was taken out of context and you’re a different person now… unless you’re Lucy Connolly or similar…

Lucy Connolly never apologised. She was a registered child minder who Tweeted that children, amongst others, should be set on fire at the exact time tensions were running high.

That is why the Court imposed a custodial sentence, which was upheld on appeal.

Perhaps if she hadn't held a position of responsibility she would have got off with a caution, but that simply wasn't the case.

Did she specifically say children?

Not that calling for any person to be burnt is anything short of abhorrent but I cannot recall her stating children specifically.

It is important to differentiate between fact and spin.

I take a different view in that those she wanted to set fire to included children. They are about 20% of those asylum seekers in hotels she wanted burnt to death.

She would have known that when she made her Tweets.

It's astonishing that Reform has promoted this vile child minder as some sort of political hero."

So, as abhorrent as her tweet may have been, you think that she referred to children specifically?

The point is that spin to cosy up to a political narrative can be seen to be used to negate argument.

Put it this way. It's similar to planting a glove that doesn't fit into a murder case to ensure a conviction, which deflects from the actual facts in existence.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *roadShoulderzMan
17 weeks ago

Petersfield

Read her tweet. Connelly specifically suggested setting fire to all hotels housing the "********"

Those hotels house children as well as adults. She was a Registered Child Minder.

Those are the facts and that is why she got a custodial sentence. The judgement also stated she showed no remorse.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *4bimMan
17 weeks ago

Farnborough Hampshire

what we need is a stasi like approach to anyone preaching hate.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *wosmilersCouple
17 weeks ago

Heathrowish


"Read her tweet. Connelly specifically suggested setting fire to all hotels housing the "********"

Those hotels house children as well as adults. She was a Registered Child Minder.

Those are the facts and that is why she got a custodial sentence. The judgement also stated she showed no remorse.

"

So, as abhorrent as the statement was, she didn't refer to children specifically.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
17 weeks ago


"what we need is a stasi like approach to anyone preaching hate.

"

We already have that. But they are only interested in certain types of opinions, those that Starmer disagrees with.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top