Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sadly judges have proven that they can't be trusted to have an unbiased opinion. As with all these type of situations there will be bickering and I fighting, it'll end up costing a bloody fortune and the guilty ones will get of on some ridiculous technicality. " It's not about getting the perfect fit, but the best fit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" "Sadly judges have proven that they can't be trusted to have an unbiased opinion." " The truth is, the system as it stands isn’t built around helping survivors — especially in sexual abuse cases. False allegations are extremely rare: the CPS and Home Office have both found the rate to be well under 1%, yet some police forces have inflated that figure internally to over 50%. That kind of bias filters through every stage of the process. Survivors are disbelieved, retraumatised, and often drop out of cases altogether — not because they weren’t harmed, but because they can’t face being treated like suspects. Meanwhile, abusers walk free. Following the victims’ lead here makes sense. A senior judge and genuine transparency, so long as it stays within the law, would help rebuild trust. Justice should centre survivors — not institutions protecting their reputations. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" "Sadly judges have proven that they can't be trusted to have an unbiased opinion." The truth is, the system as it stands isn’t built around helping survivors — especially in sexual abuse cases. False allegations are extremely rare: the CPS and Home Office have both found the rate to be well under 1%, yet some police forces have inflated that figure internally to over 50%. That kind of bias filters through every stage of the process. Survivors are disbelieved, retraumatised, and often drop out of cases altogether — not because they weren’t harmed, but because they can’t face being treated like suspects. Meanwhile, abusers walk free. Following the victims’ lead here makes sense. A senior judge and genuine transparency, so long as it stays within the law, would help rebuild trust. Justice should centre survivors — not institutions protecting their reputations. " This isn’t about delivering justice that’s already happened. The inquiry’s purpose is to understand what went "wrong". It’s aim is to understand the accountability, lessons learned, and prevent future occurrences. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" "This isn’t about delivering justice that’s already happened. The inquiry’s purpose is to understand what went 'wrong'. It’s aim is to understand the accountability, lessons learned, and prevent future occurrences." " That doesn’t take away from anything I said — it actually reinforces it. Fixing the system that failed these survivors is justice. Ensuring future victims are believed, supported, and not retraumatised is part of preventing future harm. Accountability and systemic reform are both forms of justice — just as much as imprisoning the perpetrators themselves. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
