Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" so he is now blaming brxit for the boat disaster as thaht mango no guts and today he blamig farge i think its time for a taxxxi for him" Well he’s right, but wondering if education was your strong point? I’d hope it’s the wine flowing, it if not it would answer my question on why I think you clearly believe what your told and are ripe for Reform. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"^ Don’t let anybody ever tell you it was the uneducated who primarily voted for Brexit."  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" so he is now blaming brxit for the boat disaster as thaht mango no guts and today he blamig farge i think its time for a taxxxi for him" You might not like it but he's 100% right 🤷♂️ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow " Spot the reform voter 👆 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow Spot the reform voter 👆" Yes if I was pushed to vote it would be for reform, you don’t need to be a reform voter to see Starmer I a useless fucking wanker | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow Spot the reform voter 👆 Yes if I was pushed to vote it would be for reform, you don’t need to be a reform voter to see Starmer I a useless fucking wanker " What that saying? Out of the frying pan into the fire ? More like into a bucket of boiling sulphuric acid with Fuktage | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow Spot the reform voter 👆 Yes if I was pushed to vote it would be for reform, you don’t need to be a reform voter to see Starmer I a useless fucking wanker What that saying? Out of the frying pan into the fire ? More like into a bucket of boiling sulphuric acid with Fuktage " Haha is it even possible to do worse than kier Saville is doing? A trained chimp could run the country better | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow Spot the reform voter 👆 Yes if I was pushed to vote it would be for reform, you don’t need to be a reform voter to see Starmer I a useless fucking wanker What that saying? Out of the frying pan into the fire ? More like into a bucket of boiling sulphuric acid with Fuktage Haha is it even possible to do worse than kier Saville is doing? A trained chimp could run the country better " Oh the irony! Everytime you post "guaranteed utter shit is coming out".... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow Spot the reform voter 👆 Yes if I was pushed to vote it would be for reform, you don’t need to be a reform voter to see Starmer I a useless fucking wanker What that saying? Out of the frying pan into the fire ? More like into a bucket of boiling sulphuric acid with Fuktage Haha is it even possible to do worse than kier Saville is doing? A trained chimp could run the country better Oh the irony! Everytime you post "guaranteed utter shit is coming out"...." Have I insulted you personally to warrant thst response? Though you left were the “tolerant” ones? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow Spot the reform voter 👆 Yes if I was pushed to vote it would be for reform, you don’t need to be a reform voter to see Starmer I a useless fucking wanker What that saying? Out of the frying pan into the fire ? More like into a bucket of boiling sulphuric acid with Fuktage Haha is it even possible to do worse than kier Saville is doing? A trained chimp could run the country better " Yeah maybe it Farage isn't as smart or caring as a chimp 🤷♂️ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow Spot the reform voter 👆" The clue is in how some refer to 'Starmer' and others refer to 'Nigel'... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" so he is now blaming brxit for the boat disaster as thaht mango no guts and today he blamig farge i think its time for a taxxxi for him" You need to calm down before posting, or pause and check your post before sending. Yes there where boats before brexit, but we had an agreement where we could send those that failed to seek asylum here, back into the EU. The tories had FOUR YEARS to renegotiate the deal for Brexit, there's no evidence they even tried. Farage pushed brexit, the boats where the big issue. Now we are no longer in the EU, with no agreement to send people back, no assistance with criminal checks, we are no longer in the club. Quite rightly the EU have turned there backs on us.. So yes they are Farages Tory boats | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow " This guys getting blocked, we don't tolerate idiocy, racism, intolerance. (We know its double standards, but at least we have some) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes there where boats before brexit, but we had an agreement where we could send those that failed to seek asylum here, back into the EU." No we didn't. The Dublin Agreements (see multiple posts above) only allowed us to send back those that had previously applied in another EU country, and had failed. There was no general returns agreement. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes there where boats before brexit, but we had an agreement where we could send those that failed to seek asylum here, back into the EU. No we didn't. The Dublin Agreements (see multiple posts above) only allowed us to send back those that had previously applied in another EU country, and had failed. There was no general returns agreement. " I didn't specify but thanks for confirming we can no longer send anyone back | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes there where boats before brexit, but we had an agreement where we could send those that failed to seek asylum here, back into the EU." "No we didn't. The Dublin Agreements (see multiple posts above) only allowed us to send back those that had previously applied in another EU country, and had failed. There was no general returns agreement." "I didn't specify but thanks for confirming we can no longer send anyone back" Apologies, I gave a quick answer because I thought this was a different thread with lots of previous posts. I'll expand. The Dublin Agreements allowed us to send back those people that had applied in another EU country, and had been rejected there. It only ever applied to about 5% of arrivals. It also meant that EU countries were able to send people back to us. In every year that the Dublin Agreements were in force, we received more people than we sent out. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow This guys getting blocked, we don't tolerate idiocy, racism, intolerance. (We know its double standards, but at least we have some)" Ahahahaha yet another one of the “tolerant” left resorting to insulting someone unprovoked who happens to have a different view point to their own | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Watching the darts and the crowd were just chanting kier starmers a wanker haha" Shame they couldn't spell his name correctly or use apostrophes where appropriate Will have given darts fanatics a bad name. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ahahahaha yet another one of the “tolerant” left resorting to insulting someone unprovoked who happens to have a different view point to their own " We tolerate a lot of the left, but the right get in a tizz over skin colour and accents  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Watching the darts and the crowd were just chanting kier starmers a wanker haha Shame they couldn't spell his name correctly or use apostrophes where appropriate Will have given darts fanatics a bad name." 180! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s now at the point that if his mouth is open guaranteed utter shit is coming out, If the useless cunt shits his pants in parliament today that would also be Nigel’s fault somehow Spot the reform voter 👆" There speaks someone who doesn't live in the UK and doesn't have to put up with Starmer or suffer the impacts. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"^ Don’t let anybody ever tell you it was the uneducated who primarily voted for Brexit." Sneering at those you consider beneath you…  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"^ Don’t let anybody ever tell you it was the uneducated who primarily voted for Brexit. Sneering at those you consider beneath you… "Sneering shouldn't have to presume boundaries! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" so he is now blaming brxit for the boat disaster as thaht mango no guts and today he blamig farge i think its time for a taxxxi for him" Eh? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Narage was incredibly clear before Brexit. He wanted closer ties with Commonwealth countries rather than EU Countries. We now have low paid Bangladeshi and Pakistani folk working in petrol stations and wiping bums in care homes, rather than Lithuanian or Polish folk. We got what the majority voted for, we have to man up a bit, stop snivelling and enjoy the consequences of our own actions." So you preferred imigration from white countries? And imigration of non whites is a problem? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes there where boats before brexit, but we had an agreement where we could send those that failed to seek asylum here, back into the EU. No we didn't. The Dublin Agreements (see multiple posts above) only allowed us to send back those that had previously applied in another EU country, and had failed. There was no general returns agreement. I didn't specify but thanks for confirming we can no longer send anyone back Apologies, I gave a quick answer because I thought this was a different thread with lots of previous posts. I'll expand. The Dublin Agreements allowed us to send back those people that had applied in another EU country, and had been rejected there. It only ever applied to about 5% of arrivals. It also meant that EU countries were able to send people back to us. In every year that the Dublin Agreements were in force, we received more people than we sent out." Exactly and countries like France just didn't follow the rules and take back people it should have... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes there where boats before brexit, but we had an agreement where we could send those that failed to seek asylum here, back into the EU. No we didn't. The Dublin Agreements (see multiple posts above) only allowed us to send back those that had previously applied in another EU country, and had failed. There was no general returns agreement. I didn't specify but thanks for confirming we can no longer send anyone back Apologies, I gave a quick answer because I thought this was a different thread with lots of previous posts. I'll expand. The Dublin Agreements allowed us to send back those people that had applied in another EU country, and had been rejected there. It only ever applied to about 5% of arrivals. It also meant that EU countries were able to send people back to us. In every year that the Dublin Agreements were in force, we received more people than we sent out. Exactly and countries like France just didn't follow the rules and take back people it should have..." Is that correct , I didn't know that , How many exactly ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes there where boats before brexit, but we had an agreement where we could send those that failed to seek asylum here, back into the EU. No we didn't. The Dublin Agreements (see multiple posts above) only allowed us to send back those that had previously applied in another EU country, and had failed. There was no general returns agreement. I didn't specify but thanks for confirming we can no longer send anyone back Apologies, I gave a quick answer because I thought this was a different thread with lots of previous posts. I'll expand. The Dublin Agreements allowed us to send back those people that had applied in another EU country, and had been rejected there. It only ever applied to about 5% of arrivals. It also meant that EU countries were able to send people back to us. In every year that the Dublin Agreements were in force, we received more people than we sent out. Exactly and countries like France just didn't follow the rules and take back people it should have..." I don't think it was a case of other countries not following rules, it was just how the agreement works, which is both ways. It is correct that more were sent to the UK than were deported in the end years but I have not seen anything saying it was rule breaking. It's a bit of a red herring as even when more were sent back, the numbers were tiny, especially compared to how many arrive these days | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes there where boats before brexit, but we had an agreement where we could send those that failed to seek asylum here, back into the EU. No we didn't. The Dublin Agreements (see multiple posts above) only allowed us to send back those that had previously applied in another EU country, and had failed. There was no general returns agreement. I didn't specify but thanks for confirming we can no longer send anyone back Apologies, I gave a quick answer because I thought this was a different thread with lots of previous posts. I'll expand. The Dublin Agreements allowed us to send back those people that had applied in another EU country, and had been rejected there. It only ever applied to about 5% of arrivals. It also meant that EU countries were able to send people back to us. In every year that the Dublin Agreements were in force, we received more people than we sent out. Exactly and countries like France just didn't follow the rules and take back people it should have... I don't think it was a case of other countries not following rules, it was just how the agreement works, which is both ways. It is correct that more were sent to the UK than were deported in the end years but I have not seen anything saying it was rule breaking. It's a bit of a red herring as even when more were sent back, the numbers were tiny, especially compared to how many arrive these days" I was particularly interested in actual numbers rather than anecdotal words ,, I know the Rwanda scheme involved the Rwandan government being able to send asylum seekers here but was unsure if they paid us or we just accepted this as a consequence of the tax payers money we were sending their way ,, ,, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
