FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Sadik Khan

Jump to newest
 

By *cocksrbetter OP   Couple (MM)
1 day ago

Teesside

He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
1 day ago

golden fields


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up. "

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

His childish insults aren't becoming of a world leader.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
1 day ago

Central


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

His childish insults aren't becoming of a world leader."

I know who I'd trust and it wouldn't be dyed orange

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cocksrbetter OP   Couple (MM)
1 day ago

Teesside


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

His childish insults aren't becoming of a world leader."

Only to Most little lefties. See Sadik playing the Islamophobia and racist card in response to Trump calling Sadik a nasty person. How he relate being called “ nasty” is a racist insult is beyond me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ie n MashCouple
1 day ago

Back in Malice


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

."

Not if you’re an original Londoner.

(I do agree with you about Trump’s comments being unbecoming of a world leader).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
1 day ago

golden fields


"

Only to Most little lefties. "

Stopped reading after this, as it shows an extreme bias.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
1 day ago

golden fields


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

.

Not if you’re an original Londoner.

(I do agree with you about Trump’s comments being unbecoming of a world leader)."

Do original Londoners like narcissistic, moronic, sexual abuse enthusiast fraudsters more than Khan?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uffelskloofMan
1 day ago

Walsall

Khan is a low IQ pipsqueak.

What’s happening to London is sadly being replicated across many major Western cities.

Trendy educated elites move to the cities for education and work. Get brainwashed into believing or otherwise adopt “high status” Leftist opinions.

Then make the mistake of electing self-serving morons like Khan who actually carry out the fantasy policies.

Cities end up as totally dysfunctional shitholes and everyone with a brain or any money leaves, making the situation worse for the people who are left.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *apybarasCouple
1 day ago

High Lighthouse

The latest YouGov polls have Trump's popularity at 16% (70% dislike) and Khan's at 26% (42% dislike).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
1 day ago

in Lancashire

He's not Boris

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
1 day ago

golden fields


"K Get brainwashed into believing or otherwise adopt “high status” Leftist opinions.

"

Do you have an example of one of these "leftist opinions"?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uddy laneMan
1 day ago

dudley


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up. "

Oi that's Mr Starmer’s best friend, like the owd saying goes, beta men flock together.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cocksrbetter OP   Couple (MM)
1 day ago

Teesside


"K Get brainwashed into believing or otherwise adopt “high status” Leftist opinions.

Do you have an example of one of these "leftist opinions"?"

Though you stopped reading this Thread???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cocksrbetter OP   Couple (MM)
1 day ago

Teesside


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

Oi that's Mr Starmer’s best friend, like the owd saying goes, beta men flock together. "

I’d of love it if Trump ask Keir why rent boys are burning his properties;)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ie n MashCouple
1 day ago

Back in Malice


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

.

Not if you’re an original Londoner.

(I do agree with you about Trump’s comments being unbecoming of a world leader).

Do original Londoners like narcissistic, moronic, sexual abuse enthusiast fraudsters more than Khan?"

Only speaking for myself, have no time for either. Major difference is that one is fuckin’ up my City of birth, while the other is fuckin’ up the whole world. I’m taking the former more personally.

Most Londoners I know (and there are plenty) detest Khan more.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *NaughtyManMan
1 day ago

Essex


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up. "

Pretty much sums up Donald Trump.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ulie.your. bottom. slutTV/TS
1 day ago

Near Glasgow


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

His childish insults aren't becoming of a world leader.

Only to Most little lefties. See Sadik playing the Islamophobia and racist card in response to Trump calling Sadik a nasty person. How he relate being called “ nasty” is a racist insult is beyond me. "

Trumps not racist at all. He has a black friend ( somewhere ).

It's not his fault that his organisation doesn't like to rent to black people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hirleyMan
23 hours ago

London


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

.

Not if you’re an original Londoner.

(I do agree with you about Trump’s comments being unbecoming of a world leader).

Do original Londoners like narcissistic, moronic, sexual abuse enthusiast fraudsters more than Khan?

Only speaking for myself, have no time for either. Major difference is that one is fuckin’ up my City of birth, while the other is fuckin’ up the whole world. I’m taking the former more personally.

Most Londoners I know (and there are plenty) detest Khan more. "

I'm no fan of Khan either. London has definitely got worse even in a short space of time I've noticed, and will continue to more so imo.

But most of it (I live in London too and have for years) just feels like vitriol and or blame is based on politics than policy. Do you blame him for ulez? R@pe gangs? All that was there with boris. Do you hate him too?

Right wing media love to use him as the face of all that's bad in London, because it fits their narrative. They conveniently leave out that the same bad things are also happening in not just other UK cities but also across the world in similar built up areas. Must be a monster cunt if that's all down to him too😂

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ie n MashCouple
22 hours ago

Back in Malice

Cracking post and great points excellently made.

I liked Boris; you knew what you were getting with him, someone who played the buffoon and couldn’t be trusted further than I could throw him. I accepted his failings, as they were always there to see and nothing he did was unexpected. Would not be surprised to see him back as PM one day.

Khan just comes across as an odious piece of work with no redeeming qualities.

You are right that politics plays a part in how people view him. Fwiw, I used to like Ken Livingstone, despite being on the “other side” of the political divide.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ormalfornorfolkMan
21 hours ago

Norwich

Trump cheats at golf. There is nothing more to be said.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amieLDN22Man
20 hours ago

London

Since when people cared this much about the Mayorship . He's not better nor worse than any other Mayor I remember. He's definitely more competent than clown Boris who spent more time (ehem) promoting and prodding his mistress than serving londerners.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *d4ugirlsMan
18 hours ago

Green Cove Springs


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

His childish insults aren't becoming of a world leader.

Only to Most little lefties. See Sadik playing the Islamophobia and racist card in response to Trump calling Sadik a nasty person. How he relate being called “ nasty” is a racist insult is beyond me. "

All great fun seeing the melt downs on here.

With the UK in such a state giving full rights to illegal immigrants taking peoples homes away to house migrants. You would think more would be waking up and seeing who is at fault.

It isn't the orange man.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *anifestoMan
13 hours ago

Ferns


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up. "

Says two blokes in *checks notes* Teeside

How does what Sadiq do in London so badly affect you 260 miles away?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
13 hours ago

golden fields


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

His childish insults aren't becoming of a world leader.

Only to Most little lefties. See Sadik playing the Islamophobia and racist card in response to Trump calling Sadik a nasty person. How he relate being called “ nasty” is a racist insult is beyond me.

All great fun seeing the melt downs on here.

With the UK in such a state giving full rights to illegal immigrants taking peoples homes away to house migrants. You would think more would be waking up and seeing who is at fault.

It isn't the orange man.

"

This!

These are the kind of posts that keep bringing me back.

It's truly astounding to witness the power of propaganda real time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hirleyMan
11 hours ago

London


"Cracking post and great points excellently made.

I liked Boris; you knew what you were getting with him, someone who played the buffoon and couldn’t be trusted further than I could throw him. I accepted his failings, as they were always there to see and nothing he did was unexpected. Would not be surprised to see him back as PM one day.

Khan just comes across as an odious piece of work with no redeeming qualities.

You are right that politics plays a part in how people view him. Fwiw, I used to like Ken Livingstone, despite being on the “other side” of the political divide."

Ken livingstone was a great mayor for London

I think you have to look past party politics for this role and the rhetoric because it's a different role. In recent times there's been decent metropolitan mayors for their local wards, like andy burnham for Manchester and andy street for Birmingham.

This role is for shaping a local identity and shouldn't be tangled up with party politics imo. But most media do it and spread bs. I'm not sure how ofcom don't fine most of them for what they broadcast, even the BBC should be getting it in the neck. But I'm not sure how they operate and if they have to receive so many complaints etc.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ougarAndCub2025Couple
11 hours ago

Aylesbury

As an outsider with limited involvement in London, I am curious to understand why Sadik Khan is not considered a suitable mayor, while Ken Livingstone or Boris Johnson were more effective. I do not intend to provoke any discussion; rather, I genuinely seek to comprehend the reasons behind these assessments. Could you kindly provide your insights and explanations?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ony 2016Man
11 hours ago

lincs /Hudd & Derby cinema


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up. "

Isn't this an example of a nasty person doing a terrible job saying that someone else is a nasty person doing a terrible job ? ????

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hirleyMan
11 hours ago

London


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

Isn't this an example of a nasty person doing a terrible job saying that someone else is a nasty person doing a terrible job ? ????"

I would like to know why so many non Londoners know so much about what it's like in London? Yet most have probably never even been, let alone lived here, and if they have they likely went to the tourist/yuppie bits

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *I TwoCouple
10 hours ago

near enough


"As an outsider with limited involvement in London, I am curious to understand why Sadik Khan is not considered a suitable mayor, while Ken Livingstone or Boris Johnson were more effective. I do not intend to provoke any discussion; rather, I genuinely seek to comprehend the reasons behind these assessments. Could you kindly provide your insights and explanations? "

Further to that, I'd ask why he has been reelected TWICE after his failed term ?

From a neutral viewpoint he is acting on the wishes of the majority in London ? No ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *cocksrbetter OP   Couple (MM)
10 hours ago

Teesside


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

Isn't this an example of a nasty person doing a terrible job saying that someone else is a nasty person doing a terrible job ? ????

I would like to know why so many non Londoners know so much about what it's like in London? Yet most have probably never even been, let alone lived here, and if they have they likely went to the tourist/yuppie bits"

I’ll tell you why my little cockney gezzer. Because people from the rest of the UK are undated with Londoners moving into their areas. Ask them the question why have you moved up North ? Answer is alway “ Cheaper houses and cost of living , and I felt like a stranger in the city where I was born “

Hope it helps .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ie n MashCouple
10 hours ago

Back in Malice


"As an outsider with limited involvement in London, I am curious to understand why Sadik Khan is not considered a suitable mayor, while Ken Livingstone or Boris Johnson were more effective. I do not intend to provoke any discussion; rather, I genuinely seek to comprehend the reasons behind these assessments. Could you kindly provide your insights and explanations?

Further to that, I'd ask why he has been reelected TWICE after his failed term ?

From a neutral viewpoint he is acting on the wishes of the majority in London ? No ?"

He has an electorate that is “motivated” to vote.

As with most winners of political votes, the majority of those voting went for him. This is not necessarily the majority of the potential electorate.

Voting indifference is a real bugbear of mine. Even if I spoil my ballot paper, as I often do now in the absence of a “none of the above option”, I make the effort to attend the polling station.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *I TwoCouple
10 hours ago

near enough


"As an outsider with limited involvement in London, I am curious to understand why Sadik Khan is not considered a suitable mayor, while Ken Livingstone or Boris Johnson were more effective. I do not intend to provoke any discussion; rather, I genuinely seek to comprehend the reasons behind these assessments. Could you kindly provide your insights and explanations?

Further to that, I'd ask why he has been reelected TWICE after his failed term ?

From a neutral viewpoint he is acting on the wishes of the majority in London ? No ?

He has an electorate that is “motivated” to vote.

As with most winners of political votes, the majority of those voting went for him. This is not necessarily the majority of the potential electorate.

Voting indifference is a real bugbear of mine. Even if I spoil my ballot paper, as I often do now in the absence of a “none of the above option”, I make the effort to attend the polling station."

Well then you (plural) effectively voted for him by abstaining so in the words of some geezer "suck it up buttercup?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ie n MashCouple
10 hours ago

Back in Malice

Have to agree, although hard to discuss anything in great depth with someone who chooses to go on a swingers site and hide their profile.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hirleyMan
9 hours ago

London


" Answer is alway “ Cheaper houses and cost of living "

Bingo

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ougarAndCub2025Couple
9 hours ago

Aylesbury

Isn’t it the house prices are decided based on supply and demand? London Mayor can implement social housing schemes and as far as I can find from the news outlets, they are already committed for 100K houses but the Mayoralty can’t build the houses themselves, it still requires local boroughs and developers.

Re: cost of living, he doesn’t have any power on this, has he? It is the Government’s responsibility, am I wrong?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hirleyMan
9 hours ago

London

I remember hearing some fools last year crying that they weren't allowed the chance to vote in the mayor of greater London elections because they didn't live here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hirleyMan
9 hours ago

London


"Isn’t it the house prices are decided based on supply and demand? London Mayor can implement social housing schemes and as far as I can find from the news outlets, they are already committed for 100K houses but the Mayoralty can’t build the houses themselves, it still requires local boroughs and developers.

Re: cost of living, he doesn’t have any power on this, has he? It is the Government’s responsibility, am I wrong?"

No. I've already said that sadiq Khan gets the brunt of it from issues that are not unique to London but are global above👆🏻

Read this thread I made the other day:

https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/politics/1722741

If you read it you will understand it's barely anything to do with population growth

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ony 2016Man
9 hours ago

lincs /Hudd & Derby cinema


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

Isn't this an example of a nasty person doing a terrible job saying that someone else is a nasty person doing a terrible job ? ????

I would like to know why so many non Londoners know so much about what it's like in London? Yet most have probably never even been, let alone lived here, and if they have they likely went to the tourist/yuppie bits"

Crikey ,we got Reforms Andrea Jenkins as our Mayor , the one , who when she was a Tory made Liz Truss seem sensible. ,, you Londoners don't know how lucky you are.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *d4ugirlsMan
4 hours ago

Green Cove Springs


"As an outsider with limited involvement in London, I am curious to understand why Sadik Khan is not considered a suitable mayor, while Ken Livingstone or Boris Johnson were more effective. I do not intend to provoke any discussion; rather, I genuinely seek to comprehend the reasons behind these assessments. Could you kindly provide your insights and explanations?

Further to that, I'd ask why he has been reelected TWICE after his failed term ?

From a neutral viewpoint he is acting on the wishes of the majority in London ? No ?"

Lot of speculation as in the states about voter fraud and rigged elections.

Interesting question.

Could be the planned influx of migrants. As mentioned throughout these comments and as my Dad told me, time to move I am no longer a native in my own area he had lived in for the last 30+ years.

So sad so many on here are clueless about the face of Britain changing and being taken over.

Saddens me each year that I come over to visit family and friends.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *apybarasCouple
4 hours ago

High Lighthouse


"As an outsider with limited involvement in London, I am curious to understand why Sadik Khan is not considered a suitable mayor, while Ken Livingstone or Boris Johnson were more effective. I do not intend to provoke any discussion; rather, I genuinely seek to comprehend the reasons behind these assessments. Could you kindly provide your insights and explanations?

Further to that, I'd ask why he has been reelected TWICE after his failed term ?

From a neutral viewpoint he is acting on the wishes of the majority in London ? No ?

Lot of speculation as in the states about voter fraud and rigged elections.

Interesting question.

Could be the planned influx of migrants. As mentioned throughout these comments and as my Dad told me, time to move I am no longer a native in my own area he had lived in for the last 30+ years.

So sad so many on here are clueless about the face of Britain changing and being taken over.

Saddens me each year that I come over to visit family and friends.

"

Speculation, by whom? I don't see a lot of convictions over the years on voter fraud (probably because very little actually happens).

The "influx" of immigrants is probably not something the mayor of London has much influence over...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
4 hours ago

golden fields


"As an outsider with limited involvement in London, I am curious to understand why Sadik Khan is not considered a suitable mayor, while Ken Livingstone or Boris Johnson were more effective. I do not intend to provoke any discussion; rather, I genuinely seek to comprehend the reasons behind these assessments. Could you kindly provide your insights and explanations?

Further to that, I'd ask why he has been reelected TWICE after his failed term ?

From a neutral viewpoint he is acting on the wishes of the majority in London ? No ?

Lot of speculation as in the states about voter fraud and rigged elections.

Interesting question.

Could be the planned influx of migrants. As mentioned throughout these comments and as my Dad told me, time to move I am no longer a native in my own area he had lived in for the last 30+ years.

So sad so many on here are clueless about the face of Britain changing and being taken over.

Saddens me each year that I come over to visit family and friends."

Earlier on you said "With the UK in such a state giving full rights to illegal immigrants taking peoples homes away to house migrants.". So wherever you get your misinformation from, probably isn't the best place to believe the "speculation" from either.

You are right about "the face of Britain changing and being taken over", the media have worked up an element of the electorate into such a blind panic about foreigners that they're voting for Reform and participating in race-hate riots. Sad times.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *agan_PairCouple
2 hours ago

portchester


"He a nasty person and doing a terrible job. Pretty much some him up.

In fairness, most people will be more favourable over Khan than they are Trump.

His childish insults aren't becoming of a world leader."

this is like saying most people are more favourable of genital warts than HIV, end of the day both are unwanted.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hirleyMan
56 minutes ago

London


"

You are right about "the face of Britain changing and being taken over", the media have worked up an element of the electorate into such a blind panic about foreigners that they're voting for Reform and participating in race-hate riots. Sad times. "

It's not sad, it's a gravely concerning for the majority of the UK! In fact that same "element of the electorate" that reform appeal to, will overwhelmingly be adversely affected directly by what they want to do with UK policy.

Think the last few years with the cost of living was bad for the masses? It will be much worse over the next decade if reform get any say on policy. There seems no difference from this Labour to the last Tory government, still have stagnation. Reform will turn it into a replica of dickensian times

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
51 minutes ago

Gilfach


"Think the last few years with the cost of living was bad for the masses? It will be much worse over the next decade if reform get any say on policy. There seems no difference from this Labour to the last Tory government, still have stagnation. Reform will turn it into a replica of dickensian times"

What policies do Reform have that will increase the cost of living?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *arry and MegsCouple
17 minutes ago

Ipswich


"Think the last few years with the cost of living was bad for the masses? It will be much worse over the next decade if reform get any say on policy. There seems no difference from this Labour to the last Tory government, still have stagnation. Reform will turn it into a replica of dickensian times

What policies do Reform have that will increase the cost of living?"

What policies do reform have ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top