
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
| Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Obviously sad news on a personal level that Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an aggressive and advanced form of prostate cancer, and one wishes him well. But there seems to be a lot of evidence that Democrats and the Democrat aligned mainstream media conspired to conceal the true extent of Biden’s mental state from the American electorate. It also seems to be quite unusual that such an advanced form of prostate cancer would appear without some previous history. There do seem to be questions that need to be asked as to whether Biden’s physical, as well as mental, state was deliberately concealed from the American people. If the Biden/Harris ticket had succeeded as originally planned, by now it looks like Biden would have been stepping aside for the hapless Harris just a few months into his Presidency. It raises interesting questions about transparency in the political arena. There seems to be quite a lot of due diligence undertaken on US senior politicians. By comparison in the UK we know next to nothing about our “leaders”. There have been all sorts of rumours about Starmer circulating, his relationship with donors, hints about super injunctions etc. Should citizens be entitled to know exactly who they might be voting for, or should politicians be entitled to a private life, even if that might involve them deceiving the public about their morality and who they really are? " You forgot to cite all the evidence you mention. Please enlighten us | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Obviously sad news on a personal level that Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an aggressive and advanced form of prostate cancer, and one wishes him well. But there seems to be a lot of evidence that Democrats and the Democrat aligned mainstream media conspired to conceal the true extent of Biden’s mental state from the American electorate. It also seems to be quite unusual that such an advanced form of prostate cancer would appear without some previous history. There do seem to be questions that need to be asked as to whether Biden’s physical, as well as mental, state was deliberately concealed from the American people. If the Biden/Harris ticket had succeeded as originally planned, by now it looks like Biden would have been stepping aside for the hapless Harris just a few months into his Presidency. It raises interesting questions about transparency in the political arena. There seems to be quite a lot of due diligence undertaken on US senior politicians. By comparison in the UK we know next to nothing about our “leaders”. There have been all sorts of rumours about Starmer circulating, his relationship with donors, hints about super injunctions etc. Should citizens be entitled to know exactly who they might be voting for, or should politicians be entitled to a private life, even if that might involve them deceiving the public about their morality and who they really are? " Is this thread really about Biden or is it just another reason to have a dig at Starmer? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Obviously sad news on a personal level that Joe Biden has been diagnosed with an aggressive and advanced form of prostate cancer, and one wishes him well. But there seems to be a lot of evidence that Democrats and the Democrat aligned mainstream media conspired to conceal the true extent of Biden’s mental state from the American electorate. It also seems to be quite unusual that such an advanced form of prostate cancer would appear without some previous history. There do seem to be questions that need to be asked as to whether Biden’s physical, as well as mental, state was deliberately concealed from the American people. If the Biden/Harris ticket had succeeded as originally planned, by now it looks like Biden would have been stepping aside for the hapless Harris just a few months into his Presidency. It raises interesting questions about transparency in the political arena. There seems to be quite a lot of due diligence undertaken on US senior politicians. By comparison in the UK we know next to nothing about our “leaders”. There have been all sorts of rumours about Starmer circulating, his relationship with donors, hints about super injunctions etc. Should citizens be entitled to know exactly who they might be voting for, or should politicians be entitled to a private life, even if that might involve them deceiving the public about their morality and who they really are? Is this thread really about Biden or is it just another reason to have a dig at Starmer?" Starmer’s popularity rating is -46 last time I looked. If you don’t want to hear criticism of Starmer you probably need to leave the country until 2029. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |