FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Dodds Resigns

Jump to newest
 

By *uffleskloof OP   Man
3 days ago

Walsall

International Aid Minister Anneliese Dodds resigns over Starmer’s decision to cut the foreign aid budget.

She said that “ultimately, these cuts will remove food and healthcare from desperate people”.

Has she tried visiting Britain lately?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eoBloomsMan
3 days ago

Springfield

I guess fair play for resigning on principle.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lderguy4uMan
3 days ago

wirral

Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ortyairCouple
3 days ago

Wallasey

[Removed by poster at 28/02/25 13:42:49]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ortyairCouple
3 days ago

Wallasey


"International Aid Minister Anneliese Dodds resigns over Starmer’s decision to cut the foreign aid budget.

She said that “ultimately, these cuts will remove food and healthcare from desperate people”.

Has she tried visiting Britain lately?"

Maybe when the last food bank closes and the homeless are re-homed then we can think about foreign aid.

Although she's sticking to her principles, you can't eat or live in a them,

Mrs x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hetalkingstoveMan
3 days ago

London


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away"

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
3 days ago

in Lancashire


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to."

This..

Anyone who thinks the wealth gap between the richest and the poorest in this society has got anything to do with foreign aid is seriously deluded..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
3 days ago

couple, us we him her.

Meh, what good is the moral high ground if we are unable to defend ourselves if required.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
3 days ago

Terra Firma


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to."

I would rather we looked after people here first and only if we have a surplus allow it to be sent elsewhere.. No matter what flavour of socialism you wrap up the finances of the UK in, there is no endless supply of money, without causing extreme poverty.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exy_HornyCouple
3 days ago

Leigh

Soft power is largely a myth perpetuated by the left wing socialists.

Giving money to China, India and other similar countries is just madness. They must laugh so much that it hurts.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *apybarasCouple
3 days ago

High Lighthouse!


"I guess fair play for resigning on principle.

"

I half agree, but then she had sold out her principles to go along with the Starmer project in my opinion.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *apybarasCouple
3 days ago

High Lighthouse!


"Meh, what good is the moral high ground if we are unable to defend ourselves if required.

"

From whom?

The only thing we have done with our armed forces since WWII is meddle in other people's countries and generally make the world worse.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ortyairCouple
3 days ago

Wallasey


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to.

I would rather we looked after people here first and only if we have a surplus allow it to be sent elsewhere.. No matter what flavour of socialism you wrap up the finances of the UK in, there is no endless supply of money, without causing extreme poverty. "

Exactly this, said much better than I could, Mrs x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *apybarasCouple
3 days ago

High Lighthouse!


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to.

I would rather we looked after people here first and only if we have a surplus allow it to be sent elsewhere.. No matter what flavour of socialism you wrap up the finances of the UK in, there is no endless supply of money, without causing extreme poverty. Exactly this, said much better than I could, Mrs x

"

But we do have an endless supply of money. We have a fiat currency, when the Government spends, it doesn't actually need any income to do so.

Ok, there are side affects to this, but ultimately the argument "there's not enough money" is false.

Look at all the Covid, Ukraine, etc. spending. When the Government wishes it can make as much money as it wishes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
3 days ago

Central

In stark contrast with the typical lot over the last 24, years where wrong doers carried on until forced out of their job. It's refreshing that people are willing to put others first.

Poverty in this country is largely a state choice. We're blinkered if we're blind to how we can help ourselves by helping others

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lexm87Man
3 days ago

Various


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to.

I would rather we looked after people here first and only if we have a surplus allow it to be sent elsewhere.. No matter what flavour of socialism you wrap up the finances of the UK in, there is no endless supply of money, without causing extreme poverty. Exactly this, said much better than I could, Mrs x

But we do have an endless supply of money. We have a fiat currency, when the Government spends, it doesn't actually need any income to do so.

Ok, there are side affects to this, but ultimately the argument "there's not enough money" is false.

Look at all the Covid, Ukraine, etc. spending. When the Government wishes it can make as much money as it wishes.

"

Thank you! To quote a taxation expert: "how does a gov create money? It presses a button on a keyboard..."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uffleskloof OP   Man
3 days ago

Walsall


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to.

I would rather we looked after people here first and only if we have a surplus allow it to be sent elsewhere.. No matter what flavour of socialism you wrap up the finances of the UK in, there is no endless supply of money, without causing extreme poverty. Exactly this, said much better than I could, Mrs x

But we do have an endless supply of money. We have a fiat currency, when the Government spends, it doesn't actually need any income to do so.

Ok, there are side affects to this, but ultimately the argument "there's not enough money" is false.

Look at all the Covid, Ukraine, etc. spending. When the Government wishes it can make as much money as it wishes.

"

Most countries have fiat currency. They could print it themselves.

I’ve always wondered why the government doesn’t simply print a load of money and give every person in the country £5 million.

Then we would all be rich and there wouldn’t be any problems.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *apybarasCouple
3 days ago

High Lighthouse!


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to.

I would rather we looked after people here first and only if we have a surplus allow it to be sent elsewhere.. No matter what flavour of socialism you wrap up the finances of the UK in, there is no endless supply of money, without causing extreme poverty. Exactly this, said much better than I could, Mrs x

But we do have an endless supply of money. We have a fiat currency, when the Government spends, it doesn't actually need any income to do so.

Ok, there are side affects to this, but ultimately the argument "there's not enough money" is false.

Look at all the Covid, Ukraine, etc. spending. When the Government wishes it can make as much money as it wishes.

Most countries have fiat currency. They could print it themselves.

I’ve always wondered why the government doesn’t simply print a load of money and give every person in the country £5 million.

Then we would all be rich and there wouldn’t be any problems.

"

The issue is that we are not self sufficient, we have trading partners. Therefore, we have to maintain our currency value.

However, when the government spends money on capital projects (internally) much of the money is taken back out of the system through tax etc. while at the same time sparking economic growth, employment etc.

The same for funding the NHS and other public services.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesOfFilthMan
3 days ago

nearby

[Removed by poster at 28/02/25 16:46:31]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
3 days ago

couple, us we him her.


"Meh, what good is the moral high ground if we are unable to defend ourselves if required.

From whom?

The only thing we have done with our armed forces since WWII is meddle in other people's countries and generally make the world worse."

Ermmm Russia for starters or are you forgetting that they already carried out an attack on mainland Britain with a nerve agent killing innocent civilians.

So yeah I'd prefer to have a better equipped armed forces available for the defence of the country or able to supply forces to assist NATO if required rather than virtue signalling about how much money we give to other countries which is particularly tasteless given how many people are sleeping rough or rely on food banks, but hey as long as other countries are ok our people can do one.

No the UK has given hundreds of billions in aid and charity over the years and what has it got us?

Other than being invaded slowly by small boats by people with their hands out ready for free cash.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesOfFilthMan
3 days ago

nearby

Pensioners, farmers and now overseas aid

economic growth forecast halved, inflation up, more businesses closing than opening, more unemployment

Labour taking the country down the shitter

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
3 days ago

Hastings


"Meh, what good is the moral high ground if we are unable to defend ourselves if required.

From whom?

The only thing we have done with our armed forces since WWII is meddle in other people's countries and generally make the world worse."

Argentina

The Falkland war The residents are British but where successful defendid and the terotry is still British.

The big question is could the British forces put air defence down just one side of the UK if there was a threat? 🤔

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
3 days ago

Terra Firma


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to.

I would rather we looked after people here first and only if we have a surplus allow it to be sent elsewhere.. No matter what flavour of socialism you wrap up the finances of the UK in, there is no endless supply of money, without causing extreme poverty. Exactly this, said much better than I could, Mrs x

But we do have an endless supply of money. We have a fiat currency, when the Government spends, it doesn't actually need any income to do so.

Ok, there are side affects to this, but ultimately the argument "there's not enough money" is false.

Look at all the Covid, Ukraine, etc. spending. When the Government wishes it can make as much money as it wishes.

Most countries have fiat currency. They could print it themselves.

I’ve always wondered why the government doesn’t simply print a load of money and give every person in the country £5 million.

Then we would all be rich and there wouldn’t be any problems.

The issue is that we are not self sufficient, we have trading partners. Therefore, we have to maintain our currency value.

However, when the government spends money on capital projects (internally) much of the money is taken back out of the system through tax etc. while at the same time sparking economic growth, employment etc.

The same for funding the NHS and other public services.

"

The idea that there’s no limit to spending sounds nice in theory, but in reality, excessive money printing leads to poverty by a thousand cuts, high inflation, loss of wage value and the cost of living sky rocketing.

As mentioned above there is a reason we don't all have 5 million printed off for us to be rich, because it wouldn’t make us rich, it would make our money worthless..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eoBloomsMan
3 days ago

Springfield

Nothing wrong with soft power, it can be very effective, but only when backed up by hard power. The UK used to understand this better than most, now we pay others to spit in our face.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mateur100Man
3 days ago

nr faversham

Let's be clear, she's resigned from the cabinet, not as an MP

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oubleswing2019Man
2 days ago

Colchester

Soft power is incredibly important.

Don't agree with me ?

Tell that then to Xi.

Chinese foreign aid has consistently exceeded $3 Billion since 2021. Since 2011, it's been at least $2 Billion a year.

Between 2013 - 2018, 45% of that aid went to Africa.

China understand the value in this only too well, and they do play the long game.

Reducing our aid leaves a void and countries like China will be rubbing their hands, ready to fill that gap.

Does China have systemic issues with poverty, homelessness and other issues ? Yes of course it does. But it still has an eye on the long game, and foreign aid is part of that strategy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *regoniansCouple
2 days ago

Oundle


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to.

This..

Anyone who thinks the wealth gap between the richest and the poorest in this society has got anything to do with foreign aid is seriously deluded.."

Really? There are supposedly 14.8m poeple in this country living below the livery line. The foreign aid budget was £14.3 billion, almost exactly £1000 for each of those people. 20 quid a week each or 80 quid a week for a family of 4. I know where I'd be allocating it - amd it wouldn't be propping up tinpot dictators or subsidising nuclear powers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enSiskoMan
2 days ago

Cestus 3

The money is not for the poor, it is for defence.

It is not for food or shelter.

It is to buy or make arms.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *melie LALWoman
2 days ago

Peterborough


"Plenty of people here with nothing never mind giving it away

The reason people here have nothing isn't because of foreign aid. We could do both, we just choose not to.

I would rather we looked after people here first and only if we have a surplus allow it to be sent elsewhere.. No matter what flavour of socialism you wrap up the finances of the UK in, there is no endless supply of money, without causing extreme poverty. Exactly this, said much better than I could, Mrs x

But we do have an endless supply of money. We have a fiat currency, when the Government spends, it doesn't actually need any income to do so.

Ok, there are side affects to this, but ultimately the argument "there's not enough money" is false.

Look at all the Covid, Ukraine, etc. spending. When the Government wishes it can make as much money as it wishes.

Most countries have fiat currency. They could print it themselves.

I’ve always wondered why the government doesn’t simply print a load of money and give every person in the country £5 million.

Then we would all be rich and there wouldn’t be any problems."

If you want to devalue currency. It'd be like having a spare fiver in ya purse.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top