Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the number of posts are more due to the number of stupid things he’s been doing. It’s a very good example of the dangers of letting extreme right god botherers any where near power. It was going to be this way for the first few months till he gets bored and whatever normality he is capable of takes over." I predict a riot... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the number of posts are more due to the number of stupid things he’s been doing. It’s a very good example of the dangers of letting extreme right god botherers any where near power. It was going to be this way for the first few months till he gets bored and whatever normality he is capable of takes over. I predict a riot..." It’s not always starts with Franz Ferdinand | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of." Sounds a bit xenophobic. Next you’ll be telling us we can’t admire foreign footballers or eat foreign muck food or watch foreign films. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of. Sounds a bit xenophobic. Next you’ll be telling us we can’t admire foreign footballers or eat foreign muck food or watch foreign films." It’s a strange take, but you do you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of." i imagine they are intrested to see if what he does works, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of." Maybe they're supporters of what he does as a president rather than the country he's president of? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The level of TDS has been rising with such speed over the last week, causing hysteria that forces people into reciting overly complicated sentences that join together these words: narcissist, sociopath, psychopath, misogynist and felon. I heard in Jan of a person who shaved off their hair and declared a hunger strike until Trump was removed, that is now only level 2 TDS. The mutation of TDS doesn't really follow the usual virus patterns, this goes the other way actually getting stronger and harder to treat. " Syndromes aren't viruses... carry on  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of." Possibly the fact he is so unpredictable, so different to other politicians and also so powerful, and often dam right daft, that it makes it interesting to many. Also what America does has a habit of affecting many other countries. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The level of TDS has been rising with such speed over the last week, causing hysteria that forces people into reciting overly complicated sentences that join together these words: narcissist, sociopath, psychopath, misogynist and felon. I heard in Jan of a person who shaved off their hair and declared a hunger strike until Trump was removed, that is now only level 2 TDS. The mutation of TDS doesn't really follow the usual virus patterns, this goes the other way actually getting stronger and harder to treat. Syndromes aren't viruses... carry on "It's not an actual syndrome, either. I suppose it might be argued that opposing Trump is deranged; but who usually argues it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The level of TDS has been rising with such speed over the last week, causing hysteria that forces people into reciting overly complicated sentences that join together these words: narcissist, sociopath, psychopath, misogynist and felon. I heard in Jan of a person who shaved off their hair and declared a hunger strike until Trump was removed, that is now only level 2 TDS. The mutation of TDS doesn't really follow the usual virus patterns, this goes the other way actually getting stronger and harder to treat. Syndromes aren't viruses... carry on "Good point, maybe it should be TVS. It is definitely in the realms of a pathogen how it invades the mind, and the liberally inflicted seem to be the host. As you were | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree with Buck, if you support Trump, all you have left is moronic insults like "TDS". Especially when someone discusses his rhetoric and his policies, there's no logical defense, so they lash out with insults targeting the person rather than what the person is saying. It's standard issue behaviour from people who support the indefensible, whatever the topic is." Yep. Earlier on, I used Starmer Derangement Syndrome, for the purpose of irony. Both terms are absurd. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree with Buck, if you support Trump, all you have left is moronic insults like "TDS". Especially when someone discusses his rhetoric and his policies, there's no logical defense, so they lash out with insults targeting the person rather than what the person is saying. It's standard issue behaviour from people who support the indefensible, whatever the topic is." If "TDS" is a moronic insult, then so is dismissing anyone who may agree with Trump as incapable of providing a logical defence. The irony here is that while criticising name calling, you’re engaging in the same thing by assuming that anyone who agrees with Trump is unable to discuss or think rationally. Automatically taking the opposite stance to Trump on everything doesn’t provide the moral high ground, it just weakens peoples own opinions and therefore their arguments. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree with Buck, if you support Trump, all you have left is moronic insults like "TDS". Especially when someone discusses his rhetoric and his policies, there's no logical defense, so they lash out with insults targeting the person rather than what the person is saying. It's standard issue behaviour from people who support the indefensible, whatever the topic is. If "TDS" is a moronic insult, then so is dismissing anyone who may agree with Trump as incapable of providing a logical defence. The irony here is that while criticising name calling, you’re engaging in the same thing by assuming that anyone who agrees with Trump is unable to discuss or think rationally. Automatically taking the opposite stance to Trump on everything doesn’t provide the moral high ground, it just weakens peoples own opinions and therefore their arguments. " Interesting. Do you have an example of a Trumper having a logical and coherent defence of Trump's policies and rhetoric? Because all I see is "TDS" repeated over and over again in response to criticism of his rhetoric on say, Greenland, or his policy on climate change etc. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree with Buck, if you support Trump, all you have left is moronic insults like "TDS". Especially when someone discusses his rhetoric and his policies, there's no logical defense, so they lash out with insults targeting the person rather than what the person is saying. It's standard issue behaviour from people who support the indefensible, whatever the topic is. If "TDS" is a moronic insult, then so is dismissing anyone who may agree with Trump as incapable of providing a logical defence. The irony here is that while criticising name calling, you’re engaging in the same thing by assuming that anyone who agrees with Trump is unable to discuss or think rationally. Automatically taking the opposite stance to Trump on everything doesn’t provide the moral high ground, it just weakens peoples own opinions and therefore their arguments. Interesting. Do you have an example of a Trumper having a logical and coherent defence of Trump's policies and rhetoric? Because all I see is "TDS" repeated over and over again in response to criticism of his rhetoric on say, Greenland, or his policy on climate change etc. " I can certainly defend some of his rhetoric. A perfect example is how he has never made a secret about not liking Nato or how European countries are not contributing enough to it and expecting US military support. He was also very specific about ending the war in Ukraine and again the lack of European presence to counter Russia in Europe. We now have European countries falling over themselves to provide peacekeeping soldiers, and upping the spend on Nato. People don't like him, but he gets things moving and when you contrast and compare Biden, it feels like we have someone who is willing to actually say it as it is. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree with Buck, if you support Trump, all you have left is moronic insults like "TDS". Especially when someone discusses his rhetoric and his policies, there's no logical defense, so they lash out with insults targeting the person rather than what the person is saying. It's standard issue behaviour from people who support the indefensible, whatever the topic is. If "TDS" is a moronic insult, then so is dismissing anyone who may agree with Trump as incapable of providing a logical defence. The irony here is that while criticising name calling, you’re engaging in the same thing by assuming that anyone who agrees with Trump is unable to discuss or think rationally. Automatically taking the opposite stance to Trump on everything doesn’t provide the moral high ground, it just weakens peoples own opinions and therefore their arguments. Interesting. Do you have an example of a Trumper having a logical and coherent defence of Trump's policies and rhetoric? Because all I see is "TDS" repeated over and over again in response to criticism of his rhetoric on say, Greenland, or his policy on climate change etc. I can certainly defend some of his rhetoric. A perfect example is how he has never made a secret about not liking Nato or how European countries are not contributing enough to it and expecting US military support. He was also very specific about ending the war in Ukraine and again the lack of European presence to counter Russia in Europe. We now have European countries falling over themselves to provide peacekeeping soldiers, and upping the spend on Nato. People don't like him, but he gets things moving and when you contrast and compare Biden, it feels like we have someone who is willing to actually say it as it is." These examples are bonkers. He certainly says a lot of mad, out of touch nonsense, as per your example, about Ukraine. I don't see how this is defensible. He's simply not in touch with reality. "Gets things moving" only makes sense if he gets good things moving. Which we don't have any evidence of. Only self serving things, or increased profits for the fossil fuels industry at the expense of the climate. " it feels like we have someone who is willing to actually say it as it is.". This is bonkers even for a Trump apologist. He thinks climate science isn't real, he thinks he can take over Canada and Greenland. He thinks it's okay to sexually abuse women. He says lots of utter shite. Anyway, do you have any real examples? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I can certainly defend some of his rhetoric. A perfect example is how he has never made a secret about not liking Nato or how European countries are not contributing enough to it and expecting US military support. He was also very specific about ending the war in Ukraine and again the lack of European presence to counter Russia in Europe. We now have European countries falling over themselves to provide peacekeeping soldiers, and upping the spend on Nato. People don't like him, but he gets things moving and when you contrast and compare Biden, it feels like we have someone who is willing to actually say it as it is." Despite him not liking NATO, history suggests that the only time any one NATO member filed an Article 5 notice it was issued by the United States and every other NATO member responded without hesitation. Europe, the United States and NATO will be around for a lot longer than the Trump regime no matter how much of normality he tries to blow up and destroy in the time that he has. My opinion is that this display of aggression and anger towards friends and allies whilst seemingly giving Putin an easy time is because Trump’s intention is absolutely to occupy Greenland, send troops into Panama and move heaven and earth to coerce Canada into losing its independence. I do actually think that the world is entering its most dangerous times since the Cuban missile crisis only this time it is the Russians AND the United States together targeting expansionism and hostile interventions. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I agree with Buck, if you support Trump, all you have left is moronic insults like "TDS". Especially when someone discusses his rhetoric and his policies, there's no logical defense, so they lash out with insults targeting the person rather than what the person is saying. It's standard issue behaviour from people who support the indefensible, whatever the topic is. If "TDS" is a moronic insult, then so is dismissing anyone who may agree with Trump as incapable of providing a logical defence. The irony here is that while criticising name calling, you’re engaging in the same thing by assuming that anyone who agrees with Trump is unable to discuss or think rationally. Automatically taking the opposite stance to Trump on everything doesn’t provide the moral high ground, it just weakens peoples own opinions and therefore their arguments. Interesting. Do you have an example of a Trumper having a logical and coherent defence of Trump's policies and rhetoric? Because all I see is "TDS" repeated over and over again in response to criticism of his rhetoric on say, Greenland, or his policy on climate change etc. I can certainly defend some of his rhetoric. A perfect example is how he has never made a secret about not liking Nato or how European countries are not contributing enough to it and expecting US military support. He was also very specific about ending the war in Ukraine and again the lack of European presence to counter Russia in Europe. We now have European countries falling over themselves to provide peacekeeping soldiers, and upping the spend on Nato. People don't like him, but he gets things moving and when you contrast and compare Biden, it feels like we have someone who is willing to actually say it as it is. These examples are bonkers. He certainly says a lot of mad, out of touch nonsense, as per your example, about Ukraine. I don't see how this is defensible. He's simply not in touch with reality. "Gets things moving" only makes sense if he gets good things moving. Which we don't have any evidence of. Only self serving things, or increased profits for the fossil fuels industry at the expense of the climate. " it feels like we have someone who is willing to actually say it as it is.". This is bonkers even for a Trump apologist. He thinks climate science isn't real, he thinks he can take over Canada and Greenland. He thinks it's okay to sexually abuse women. He says lots of utter shite. Anyway, do you have any real examples? " You took my comment, ridiculed it, and turned it into the attack on Trump you wanted it to be. Tell me an alternative to Ukraine | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I can certainly defend some of his rhetoric. A perfect example is how he has never made a secret about not liking Nato or how European countries are not contributing enough to it and expecting US military support. He was also very specific about ending the war in Ukraine and again the lack of European presence to counter Russia in Europe. We now have European countries falling over themselves to provide peacekeeping soldiers, and upping the spend on Nato. People don't like him, but he gets things moving and when you contrast and compare Biden, it feels like we have someone who is willing to actually say it as it is. Despite him not liking NATO, history suggests that the only time any one NATO member filed an Article 5 notice it was issued by the United States and every other NATO member responded without hesitation. Europe, the United States and NATO will be around for a lot longer than the Trump regime no matter how much of normality he tries to blow up and destroy in the time that he has. My opinion is that this display of aggression and anger towards friends and allies whilst seemingly giving Putin an easy time is because Trump’s intention is absolutely to occupy Greenland, send troops into Panama and move heaven and earth to coerce Canada into losing its independence. I do actually think that the world is entering its most dangerous times since the Cuban missile crisis only this time it is the Russians AND the United States together targeting expansionism and hostile interventions." Remember Putin can stop Ukraine joining NATO by being a war or disputing territorial borders. This is a NATO and Europe own goal, and how Europe is responding to the US is worrying, do we really need someone to to kick our elected leaders up the arse to turn things around? Looking at the emergency response, I feel they've been exposed as weak and directionless. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of." I strongly suspect the there are a few profiles on the Politics forum that are bots. Their instantaneous response to any negative comment on their Great Orange Leader, even if backed by verified hard evidence, is to roll out the DJT&EM/Fox News/GOP/Putin talking points. Watch this space for their reply. It will be the same people again and again.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I can certainly defend some of his rhetoric. A perfect example is how he has never made a secret about not liking Nato or how European countries are not contributing enough to it and expecting US military support. He was also very specific about ending the war in Ukraine and again the lack of European presence to counter Russia in Europe. We now have European countries falling over themselves to provide peacekeeping soldiers, and upping the spend on Nato. People don't like him, but he gets things moving and when you contrast and compare Biden, it feels like we have someone who is willing to actually say it as it is. Despite him not liking NATO, history suggests that the only time any one NATO member filed an Article 5 notice it was issued by the United States and every other NATO member responded without hesitation. Europe, the United States and NATO will be around for a lot longer than the Trump regime no matter how much of normality he tries to blow up and destroy in the time that he has. My opinion is that this display of aggression and anger towards friends and allies whilst seemingly giving Putin an easy time is because Trump’s intention is absolutely to occupy Greenland, send troops into Panama and move heaven and earth to coerce Canada into losing its independence. I do actually think that the world is entering its most dangerous times since the Cuban missile crisis only this time it is the Russians AND the United States together targeting expansionism and hostile interventions. Remember Putin can stop Ukraine joining NATO by being a war or disputing territorial borders. This is a NATO and Europe own goal, and how Europe is responding to the US is worrying, do we really need someone to to kick our elected leaders up the arse to turn things around? Looking at the emergency response, I feel they've been exposed as weak and directionless. " It is now the time to understand; The old road has ended. Trump wants a world where money is might. IF we were attacked dirdctly by Russia the first thing Trump would do is say "Well, Mr Putin says it is because Britain said it would send to troops to Ukraine which would worry Russia. I believe Mr Putin". We are on our own now. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of. I strongly suspect the there are a few profiles on the Politics forum that are bots. Their instantaneous response to any negative comment on their Great Orange Leader, even if backed by verified hard evidence, is to roll out the DJT&EM/Fox News/GOP/Putin talking points. Watch this space for their reply. It will be the same people again and again. "wow you must think the fab politics forum is more widely read than it is,just because someone has differing opinions than what you like does not meen there a bot,they could actually think those things or just be taking the piss | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of. I strongly suspect the there are a few profiles on the Politics forum that are bots. Their instantaneous response to any negative comment on their Great Orange Leader, even if backed by verified hard evidence, is to roll out the DJT&EM/Fox News/GOP/Putin talking points. Watch this space for their reply. It will be the same people again and again.
wow you must think the fab politics forum is more widely read than it is,just because someone has differing opinions than what you like does not meen there a bot,they could actually think those things or just be taking the piss"I have no idea how many peoplecread Fab forums. Thousands I assume. However, Bots will think those things and obviously hope to discredit the opinions of others by taking the piss. One indicator of Bot is they never respond to a direct question but offer "what abouts", right wing talking points and seek to discredit others by trying to insult and belittle their opinion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of. I strongly suspect the there are a few profiles on the Politics forum that are bots. Their instantaneous response to any negative comment on their Great Orange Leader, even if backed by verified hard evidence, is to roll out the DJT&EM/Fox News/GOP/Putin talking points. Watch this space for their reply. It will be the same people again and again.
wow you must think the fab politics forum is more widely read than it is,just because someone has differing opinions than what you like does not meen there a bot,they could actually think those things or just be taking the piss
I have no idea how many peoplecread Fab forums. Thousands I assume.
However, Bots will think those things and obviously hope to discredit the opinions of others by taking the piss.
One indicator of Bot is they never respond to a direct question but offer "what abouts", right wing talking points and seek to discredit others by trying to insult and belittle their opinion. "I imagine if your lucky a few hundred people at most read these forums,and oh I see bots can only be right wingers lol do you ever listen to your self?I suppose you think anyone who dosent cheer ukraine on and points out there getting there arses handed to them is a bot aswell | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the number of posts are more due to the number of stupid things he’s been doing. It’s a very good example of the dangers of letting extreme right god botherers any where near power. It was going to be this way for the first few months till he gets bored and whatever normality he is capable of takes over. I predict a riot..." I predict a big war. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I can certainly defend some of his rhetoric. A perfect example is how he has never made a secret about not liking Nato or how European countries are not contributing enough to it and expecting US military support. He was also very specific about ending the war in Ukraine and again the lack of European presence to counter Russia in Europe. We now have European countries falling over themselves to provide peacekeeping soldiers, and upping the spend on Nato. People don't like him, but he gets things moving and when you contrast and compare Biden, it feels like we have someone who is willing to actually say it as it is. Despite him not liking NATO, history suggests that the only time any one NATO member filed an Article 5 notice it was issued by the United States and every other NATO member responded without hesitation. Europe, the United States and NATO will be around for a lot longer than the Trump regime no matter how much of normality he tries to blow up and destroy in the time that he has. My opinion is that this display of aggression and anger towards friends and allies whilst seemingly giving Putin an easy time is because Trump’s intention is absolutely to occupy Greenland, send troops into Panama and move heaven and earth to coerce Canada into losing its independence. I do actually think that the world is entering its most dangerous times since the Cuban missile crisis only this time it is the Russians AND the United States together targeting expansionism and hostile interventions. Remember Putin can stop Ukraine joining NATO by being a war or disputing territorial borders. This is a NATO and Europe own goal, and how Europe is responding to the US is worrying, do we really need someone to to kick our elected leaders up the arse to turn things around? Looking at the emergency response, I feel they've been exposed as weak and directionless. " The response is due to a USA that says it won't back Europe, big lie, it can't because it's broke but to scared to admit it. To make money it needs a war in Europe it knows it will get paid handsomely like like it did in the last one. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I can certainly defend some of his rhetoric. A perfect example is how he has never made a secret about not liking Nato or how European countries are not contributing enough to it and expecting US military support. He was also very specific about ending the war in Ukraine and again the lack of European presence to counter Russia in Europe. We now have European countries falling over themselves to provide peacekeeping soldiers, and upping the spend on Nato. People don't like him, but he gets things moving and when you contrast and compare Biden, it feels like we have someone who is willing to actually say it as it is. Despite him not liking NATO, history suggests that the only time any one NATO member filed an Article 5 notice it was issued by the United States and every other NATO member responded without hesitation. Europe, the United States and NATO will be around for a lot longer than the Trump regime no matter how much of normality he tries to blow up and destroy in the time that he has. My opinion is that this display of aggression and anger towards friends and allies whilst seemingly giving Putin an easy time is because Trump’s intention is absolutely to occupy Greenland, send troops into Panama and move heaven and earth to coerce Canada into losing its independence. I do actually think that the world is entering its most dangerous times since the Cuban missile crisis only this time it is the Russians AND the United States together targeting expansionism and hostile interventions. Remember Putin can stop Ukraine joining NATO by being a war or disputing territorial borders. This is a NATO and Europe own goal, and how Europe is responding to the US is worrying, do we really need someone to to kick our elected leaders up the arse to turn things around? Looking at the emergency response, I feel they've been exposed as weak and directionless. The response is due to a USA that says it won't back Europe, big lie, it can't because it's broke but to scared to admit it. To make money it needs a war in Europe it knows it will get paid handsomely like like it did in the last one." Interesting, so you think Trump is playing everyone to line US pockets? Wasn't Biden doing that by offering a no upper limit credit option as long as they spent the money on US arms? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of. I strongly suspect the there are a few profiles on the Politics forum that are bots. Their instantaneous response to any negative comment on their Great Orange Leader, even if backed by verified hard evidence, is to roll out the DJT&EM/Fox News/GOP/Putin talking points. Watch this space for their reply. It will be the same people again and again.
wow you must think the fab politics forum is more widely read than it is,just because someone has differing opinions than what you like does not meen there a bot,they could actually think those things or just be taking the piss
I have no idea how many peoplecread Fab forums. Thousands I assume.
However, Bots will think those things and obviously hope to discredit the opinions of others by taking the piss.
One indicator of Bot is they never respond to a direct question but offer "what abouts", right wing talking points and seek to discredit others by trying to insult and belittle their opinion. I imagine if your lucky a few hundred people at most read these forums,and oh I see bots can only be right wingers lol do you ever listen to your self?I suppose you think anyone who dosent cheer ukraine on and points out there getting there arses handed to them is a bot aswell"Of course Bots come from both sides.  What do you think I am? 
Russia is not handing Ukraine's arse back to them. The front line is virtually stationary. Considering the size of the armies Russia is losing. They are also not paying their troops who are deserting in droves. They are not paying death compensation either. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of. I strongly suspect the there are a few profiles on the Politics forum that are bots. Their instantaneous response to any negative comment on their Great Orange Leader, even if backed by verified hard evidence, is to roll out the DJT&EM/Fox News/GOP/Putin talking points. Watch this space for their reply. It will be the same people again and again.
wow you must think the fab politics forum is more widely read than it is,just because someone has differing opinions than what you like does not meen there a bot,they could actually think those things or just be taking the piss
I have no idea how many peoplecread Fab forums. Thousands I assume.
However, Bots will think those things and obviously hope to discredit the opinions of others by taking the piss.
One indicator of Bot is they never respond to a direct question but offer "what abouts", right wing talking points and seek to discredit others by trying to insult and belittle their opinion. I imagine if your lucky a few hundred people at most read these forums,and oh I see bots can only be right wingers lol do you ever listen to your self?I suppose you think anyone who dosent cheer ukraine on and points out there getting there arses handed to them is a bot aswell
Of course Bots come from both sides. What do you think I am?
Russia is not handing Ukraine's arse back to them. The front line is virtually stationary. Considering the size of the armies Russia is losing. They are also not paying their troops who are deserting in droves. They are not paying death compensation either. "Do you know specific troops Putin is losing? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m equally intrigued as to why some are ardent supporters of the president of a country they are not citizens of. I strongly suspect the there are a few profiles on the Politics forum that are bots. Their instantaneous response to any negative comment on their Great Orange Leader, even if backed by verified hard evidence, is to roll out the DJT&EM/Fox News/GOP/Putin talking points. Watch this space for their reply. It will be the same people again and again.
wow you must think the fab politics forum is more widely read than it is,just because someone has differing opinions than what you like does not meen there a bot,they could actually think those things or just be taking the piss
I have no idea how many peoplecread Fab forums. Thousands I assume.
However, Bots will think those things and obviously hope to discredit the opinions of others by taking the piss.
One indicator of Bot is they never respond to a direct question but offer "what abouts", right wing talking points and seek to discredit others by trying to insult and belittle their opinion. I imagine if your lucky a few hundred people at most read these forums,and oh I see bots can only be right wingers lol do you ever listen to your self?I suppose you think anyone who dosent cheer ukraine on and points out there getting there arses handed to them is a bot aswell
Of course Bots come from both sides. What do you think I am?
Russia is not handing Ukraine's arse back to them. The front line is virtually stationary. Considering the size of the armies Russia is losing. They are also not paying their troops who are deserting in droves. They are not paying death compensation either. "ok whatever you say but russia dont seem to be the ones running out of troops, they can keep wasting bodies for the foreseeable, ukraine on the other hand are resorting to grabbing folks off the streets, soon they will call up there youngsters then what? Or do you belive till the last ukrainian,they are looking for volunteers how about lending them a hand you seem all for fighting the russians | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's not just Trump per se, it's his administration and policies that are breaking-up the world order that's existed since WWII. We are watching history unfold before our eyes. There are so many questions : where will this lead? how should we respond? is the world a more dangerous place?" And there we have, "the world order" You can have your world order and your freedoms taken away along with your Covid shots and harmful foods. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
