Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"BBC reporting that the only issue is that the US is returning them in military aircraft. Civilians should be returned in civilian aircraft it seems..." Helpful of El Presidente now happy to send his own plane. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"BBC reporting that the only issue is that the US is returning them in military aircraft. Civilians should be returned in civilian aircraft it seems..." But the aircraft are fit to carry military personel to a war zone. Or do all the illegal migrants want a first-class return. How did they get to where they are in the first place. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"BBC reporting that the only issue is that the US is returning them in military aircraft. Civilians should be returned in civilian aircraft it seems... But the aircraft are fit to carry military personel to a war zone. Or do all the illegal migrants want a first-class return. How did they get to where they are in the first place." Reports of handcuffs and ‘mistreatment’ on flights. (Those to Brazil). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"BBC reporting that the only issue is that the US is returning them in military aircraft. Civilians should be returned in civilian aircraft it seems... But the aircraft are fit to carry military personel to a war zone. Or do all the illegal migrants want a first-class return. How did they get to where they are in the first place. Reports of handcuffs and ‘mistreatment’ on flights. (Those to Brazil). " Many people who commit a crime (such as being an ILLEGAL migrant) end up in cuffs It must be awful for them to be treated that way though. Perhaps they can claim asylum away from the awful US | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"BBC reporting that the only issue is that the US is returning them in military aircraft. Civilians should be returned in civilian aircraft it seems... But the aircraft are fit to carry military personel to a war zone. Or do all the illegal migrants want a first-class return. How did they get to where they are in the first place. Reports of handcuffs and ‘mistreatment’ on flights. (Those to Brazil). Many people who commit a crime (such as being an ILLEGAL migrant) end up in cuffs It must be awful for them to be treated that way though. Perhaps they can claim asylum away from the awful US " Even criminals are allowed trips to the bathroom, unlike the passengers on the Brazil flight | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe Colombia should stop exporting its biggest ‘product’ to the USA. That’ll piss off plenty of politicians… "Aren't they on about designating the cartels etc as terrorists to open up the possibility for military intervention? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe Colombia should stop exporting its biggest ‘product’ to the USA. That’ll piss off plenty of politicians…
Aren't they on about designating the cartels etc as terrorists to open up the possibility for military intervention?"Yep. Obviously they won’t want to cut off their own supply though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe Colombia should stop exporting its biggest ‘product’ to the USA. That’ll piss off plenty of politicians…
Aren't they on about designating the cartels etc as terrorists to open up the possibility for military intervention?
Yep. Obviously they won’t want to cut off their own supply though. "Of course not Or at least they'll want to impose control over it more They're not so much against drug money, they're just pissed all the drug money is going into cartel pockets and not their own | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Colombia refuses permission for us military planes to land in the country as these are being used as deportation flights for people Trump now say he will place an emergency 25% tariff on all Colombian goods… rising to 50% tariff if they do not comply Guess where the us gets most of its coffee from….. " To hold another country to ransom, is an impeachable offence I hear. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The repatriation flights are already being criticised for the way they are treated people Brazil are warning they will not take any more flights unless conditions improve, so have Honduras…..Venezuela as well as Colombia have said they will not take any flights " Drop them in the ocean then. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Great work by Trump. Meanwhile countries like Pakistan refuse to take back convicted r@pe gang leaders and the UK does nothing." Exactly! If a country acts strong and doesn't bend over, it's called bullying these days. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like Columbia changed its tune as soon as Trump spoke about the tariffs. Apparently they have volunteered to send their own flights to take back the immigrants "Well strictly speaking, Colombia threatened increasing tariffs in response to the US before anything was agreed on reopening flights. And Colombia are sending *one* flight, to bring back the migrants affected yesterday. https://www.forexlive.com/news/colombian-president-orders-increase-of-import-tariffs-on-us-goods-20250126/amp/ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"BBC reporting that the only issue is that the US is returning them in military aircraft. Civilians should be returned in civilian aircraft it seems... But the aircraft are fit to carry military personel to a war zone. Or do all the illegal migrants want a first-class return. How did they get to where they are in the first place. Reports of handcuffs and ‘mistreatment’ on flights. (Those to Brazil). " Handcuffs for criminals! Poor loves.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. " Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. " I’m happy to deport illegal migrants. We should also accept our own criminals from abroad. Shamima Begum, for example. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? " Why don't those countries come and collect their own scumbags then ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? Why don't those countries come and collect their own scumbags then ? " So it’s the responsibility of nations to chase their own illegal migrants abroad? Not sure that’ll sit well with the GB news/reform types in the U.K | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like Columbia changed its tune as soon as Trump spoke about the tariffs. Apparently they have volunteered to send their own flights to take back the immigrants
Well strictly speaking, Colombia threatened increasing tariffs in response to the US before anything was agreed on reopening flights. And Colombia are sending *one* flight, to bring back the migrants affected yesterday.
https://www.forexlive.com/news/colombian-president-orders-increase-of-import-tariffs-on-us-goods-20250126/amp/"Anyway US got what they wanted. Columbia imposing tariff on US will be like a mosquito bite for the US. Won't matter at all. It's just their president pretending to be strong  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? Why don't those countries come and collect their own scumbags then ? So it’s the responsibility of nations to chase their own illegal migrants abroad? Not sure that’ll sit well with the GB news/reform types in the U.K" Eh ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? Why don't those countries come and collect their own scumbags then ? So it’s the responsibility of nations to chase their own illegal migrants abroad? Not sure that’ll sit well with the GB news/reform types in the U.K Eh ? " You just advocated for other nations coming and chasing their own illegal migrants in the U.K. rather than dealing with it ourselves  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like Columbia changed its tune as soon as Trump spoke about the tariffs. Apparently they have volunteered to send their own flights to take back the immigrants
Well strictly speaking, Colombia threatened increasing tariffs in response to the US before anything was agreed on reopening flights. And Colombia are sending *one* flight, to bring back the migrants affected yesterday.
https://www.forexlive.com/news/colombian-president-orders-increase-of-import-tariffs-on-us-goods-20250126/amp/
Anyway US got what they wanted. Columbia imposing tariff on US will be like a mosquito bite for the US. Won't matter at all. It's just their president pretending to be strong "And imposing tariffs on Colombia makes products more expensive in the US. It’s a win all round if trade war is avoided. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? Why don't those countries come and collect their own scumbags then ? So it’s the responsibility of nations to chase their own illegal migrants abroad? Not sure that’ll sit well with the GB news/reform types in the U.K Eh ? You just advocated for other nations coming and chasing their own illegal migrants in the U.K. rather than dealing with it ourselves "What are you on about ? I said they could send their own planes if they're unhappy about the catering and in flight entertainment on US planes. No need to 'chase' anyone, the scumbags are ready to go at the airport. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? Why don't those countries come and collect their own scumbags then ? So it’s the responsibility of nations to chase their own illegal migrants abroad? Not sure that’ll sit well with the GB news/reform types in the U.K Eh ? You just advocated for other nations coming and chasing their own illegal migrants in the U.K. rather than dealing with it ourselves
What are you on about ? I said they could send their own planes if they're unhappy about the catering and in flight entertainment on US planes. No need to 'chase' anyone, the scumbags are ready to go at the airport. "I don’t think they asked for catering and entertainment. I think they wanted access to water and toilets. You know, basic human rights stuff. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? Why don't those countries come and collect their own scumbags then ? So it’s the responsibility of nations to chase their own illegal migrants abroad? Not sure that’ll sit well with the GB news/reform types in the U.K Eh ? You just advocated for other nations coming and chasing their own illegal migrants in the U.K. rather than dealing with it ourselves
What are you on about ? I said they could send their own planes if they're unhappy about the catering and in flight entertainment on US planes. No need to 'chase' anyone, the scumbags are ready to go at the airport.
I don’t think they asked for catering and entertainment. I think they wanted access to water and toilets. You know, basic human rights stuff.
"Can't do the time, don't do the crime. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? " It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country." Reports so far were no water and no access to bathrooms, I’d be happy to see anything to the contrary and weigh up the truth. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country." Actually… they were on the Brazilian flight… which is why Brazil were complaining and threatening not to take any more Somethings about basic human right obligations….  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like Columbia changed its tune as soon as Trump spoke about the tariffs. Apparently they have volunteered to send their own flights to take back the immigrants
Well strictly speaking, Colombia threatened increasing tariffs in response to the US before anything was agreed on reopening flights. And Colombia are sending *one* flight, to bring back the migrants affected yesterday.
https://www.forexlive.com/news/colombian-president-orders-increase-of-import-tariffs-on-us-goods-20250126/amp/
Anyway US got what they wanted. Columbia imposing tariff on US will be like a mosquito bite for the US. Won't matter at all. It's just their president pretending to be strong
And imposing tariffs on Colombia makes products more expensive in the US.
It’s a win all round if trade war is avoided. "Trump new Columbia would fold. The equation is simple: Trump imposes tariffs on Columbia. US consumers pay higher for coffee temporarily but eventually start buying more coffee from other countries. Coffee is such a small part of the entire US economy. But from the Columbian perspective, it's a massive loss. Same if Columbia imposes tariffs. US exports a partly amount of goods to Columbia. A tariff wouldn't affect them at all. In a trade war, a big economy like the US will oblierate a small economy like Columbia. Trump knew this and called the bluff. He wouldn't do this against a bigger economy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like Columbia changed its tune as soon as Trump spoke about the tariffs. Apparently they have volunteered to send their own flights to take back the immigrants
Well strictly speaking, Colombia threatened increasing tariffs in response to the US before anything was agreed on reopening flights. And Colombia are sending *one* flight, to bring back the migrants affected yesterday.
https://www.forexlive.com/news/colombian-president-orders-increase-of-import-tariffs-on-us-goods-20250126/amp/
Anyway US got what they wanted. Columbia imposing tariff on US will be like a mosquito bite for the US. Won't matter at all. It's just their president pretending to be strong
And imposing tariffs on Colombia makes products more expensive in the US.
It’s a win all round if trade war is avoided.
Trump new Columbia would fold. The equation is simple:
Trump imposes tariffs on Columbia. US consumers pay higher for coffee temporarily but eventually start buying more coffee from other countries. Coffee is such a small part of the entire US economy. But from the Columbian perspective, it's a massive loss.
Same if Columbia imposes tariffs. US exports a partly amount of goods to Columbia. A tariff wouldn't affect them at all.
In a trade war, a big economy like the US will oblierate a small economy like Columbia. Trump knew this and called the bluff. He wouldn't do this against a bigger economy."He will of course still *threaten* it though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like Columbia changed its tune as soon as Trump spoke about the tariffs. Apparently they have volunteered to send their own flights to take back the immigrants
Well strictly speaking, Colombia threatened increasing tariffs in response to the US before anything was agreed on reopening flights. And Colombia are sending *one* flight, to bring back the migrants affected yesterday.
https://www.forexlive.com/news/colombian-president-orders-increase-of-import-tariffs-on-us-goods-20250126/amp/"It was actually a very ballsy move by the Colombians, because what they threatened to retaliate with tariffs was agricultural feed… of which 95% comes from the USA, but there is a abundance they can get from elsewhere so they can switch The kicker being it tends to come from republican states, and certain senators in those states panicked | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like Columbia changed its tune as soon as Trump spoke about the tariffs. Apparently they have volunteered to send their own flights to take back the immigrants
Well strictly speaking, Colombia threatened increasing tariffs in response to the US before anything was agreed on reopening flights. And Colombia are sending *one* flight, to bring back the migrants affected yesterday.
https://www.forexlive.com/news/colombian-president-orders-increase-of-import-tariffs-on-us-goods-20250126/amp/
Anyway US got what they wanted. Columbia imposing tariff on US will be like a mosquito bite for the US. Won't matter at all. It's just their president pretending to be strong
And imposing tariffs on Colombia makes products more expensive in the US.
It’s a win all round if trade war is avoided.
Trump new Columbia would fold. The equation is simple:
Trump imposes tariffs on Columbia. US consumers pay higher for coffee temporarily but eventually start buying more coffee from other countries. Coffee is such a small part of the entire US economy. But from the Columbian perspective, it's a massive loss.
Same if Columbia imposes tariffs. US exports a partly amount of goods to Columbia. A tariff wouldn't affect them at all.
In a trade war, a big economy like the US will oblierate a small economy like Columbia. Trump knew this and called the bluff. He wouldn't do this against a bigger economy.
He will of course still *threaten* it though. "That's how geo-politics works. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country. Reports so far were no water and no access to bathrooms, I’d be happy to see anything to the contrary and weigh up the truth. " Well perhaps the inconvenience of a few hours thirst and holding a pee will deter migrants from violating another country's border. Frankly, the UK should have been taking this kind of action long ago. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country. Reports so far were no water and no access to bathrooms, I’d be happy to see anything to the contrary and weigh up the truth. Well perhaps the inconvenience of a few hours thirst and holding a pee will deter migrants from violating another country's border. Frankly, the UK should have been taking this kind of action long ago. " There’s really nothing they could do that same won’t defend, eh? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The left losing their mind over countries acting in their national interest. Get used to it fellas ! " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country. Reports so far were no water and no access to bathrooms, I’d be happy to see anything to the contrary and weigh up the truth. Well perhaps the inconvenience of a few hours thirst and holding a pee will deter migrants from violating another country's border. Frankly, the UK should have been taking this kind of action long ago. There’s really nothing they could do that same won’t defend, eh?" Question of degree. Denied water and toilet (if true) is hardly the torture chamber eh? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" There’s really nothing they could do that same won’t defend, eh? Question of degree. Denied water and toilet (if true) is hardly the torture chamber eh?" It's also material (a) how cooperative deportees are being and (b) how much of a threat they pose. Even the most angelic of children will ask for a drink and to use the toilet 16 times between their scheduled bedtime and actually falling asleep. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country. Reports so far were no water and no access to bathrooms, I’d be happy to see anything to the contrary and weigh up the truth. Well perhaps the inconvenience of a few hours thirst and holding a pee will deter migrants from violating another country's border. Frankly, the UK should have been taking this kind of action long ago. There’s really nothing they could do that same won’t defend, eh? Question of degree. Denied water and toilet (if true) is hardly the torture chamber eh?" Basic human rights, are they not? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The left losing their mind over countries acting in their national interest. Get used to it fellas ! "The deportations are legal. No argument there. How is it acting in national interest to deny someone using the toilet? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country. Reports so far were no water and no access to bathrooms, I’d be happy to see anything to the contrary and weigh up the truth. Well perhaps the inconvenience of a few hours thirst and holding a pee will deter migrants from violating another country's border. Frankly, the UK should have been taking this kind of action long ago. There’s really nothing they could do that same won’t defend, eh? Question of degree. Denied water and toilet (if true) is hardly the torture chamber eh? Basic human rights, are they not? " Well yes, but need we shed tears over the rights of law breakers? What about the rights of their victims? There's no such thing as a victimless crime right? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country. Reports so far were no water and no access to bathrooms, I’d be happy to see anything to the contrary and weigh up the truth. Well perhaps the inconvenience of a few hours thirst and holding a pee will deter migrants from violating another country's border. Frankly, the UK should have been taking this kind of action long ago. There’s really nothing they could do that same won’t defend, eh? Question of degree. Denied water and toilet (if true) is hardly the torture chamber eh? Basic human rights, are they not? Well yes, but need we shed tears over the rights of law breakers? What about the rights of their victims? There's no such thing as a victimless crime right?" I’d expect the foremost western society on the planet to treat deportees with a degree of humanity - I don’t think that’s too much to expect. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The left losing their mind over countries acting in their national interest. Get used to it fellas !
The deportations are legal. No argument there.
How is it acting in national interest to deny someone using the toilet? "Who has claimed they couldn't take a dump ? The criminals being kicked out and their home countries looking for an excuse not to accept them.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The left losing their mind over countries acting in their national interest. Get used to it fellas !
The deportations are legal. No argument there.
How is it acting in national interest to deny someone using the toilet?
Who has claimed they couldn't take a dump ? The criminals being kicked out and their home countries looking for an excuse not to accept them. "Are you denying the reports? On what evidence? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country. Reports so far were no water and no access to bathrooms, I’d be happy to see anything to the contrary and weigh up the truth. Well perhaps the inconvenience of a few hours thirst and holding a pee will deter migrants from violating another country's border. Frankly, the UK should have been taking this kind of action long ago. There’s really nothing they could do that same won’t defend, eh? Question of degree. Denied water and toilet (if true) is hardly the torture chamber eh? Basic human rights, are they not? Well yes, but need we shed tears over the rights of law breakers? What about the rights of their victims? There's no such thing as a victimless crime right? I’d expect the foremost western society on the planet to treat deportees with a degree of humanity - I don’t think that’s too much to expect. " 'foremost western society' LOL that wouldn't be my definition. Most powerful maybe, but not foremost. I can live with a 'degree of humanity', but not much more given their illegal activities. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country. Reports so far were no water and no access to bathrooms, I’d be happy to see anything to the contrary and weigh up the truth. Well perhaps the inconvenience of a few hours thirst and holding a pee will deter migrants from violating another country's border. Frankly, the UK should have been taking this kind of action long ago. There’s really nothing they could do that same won’t defend, eh? Question of degree. Denied water and toilet (if true) is hardly the torture chamber eh? Basic human rights, are they not? Well yes, but need we shed tears over the rights of law breakers? What about the rights of their victims? There's no such thing as a victimless crime right? I’d expect the foremost western society on the planet to treat deportees with a degree of humanity - I don’t think that’s too much to expect. " Putting them on a plane and taking them back is treating them well. Turfing them back over the border not so. It is sending a clear message, something our government could learn from... Smash the gangs  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. Were they unruly then? Why didn’t they have access to drinking water or bathrooms (per reports)? Do they have no rights at all? It's usual to see deportees cuffed on flights - I've seen it myself on long haul flights (usually the back rows of the aircraft). The reasons are pretty obvious. Yes, they should have access to water and toilets consistent with their needs. Very much doubt these were withheld tbh. As for their rights, perhaps they should have thought of that when they illegally entered another country. Reports so far were no water and no access to bathrooms, I’d be happy to see anything to the contrary and weigh up the truth. Well perhaps the inconvenience of a few hours thirst and holding a pee will deter migrants from violating another country's border. Frankly, the UK should have been taking this kind of action long ago. There’s really nothing they could do that same won’t defend, eh? Question of degree. Denied water and toilet (if true) is hardly the torture chamber eh? Basic human rights, are they not? Well yes, but need we shed tears over the rights of law breakers? What about the rights of their victims? There's no such thing as a victimless crime right? I’d expect the foremost western society on the planet to treat deportees with a degree of humanity - I don’t think that’s too much to expect. Putting them on a plane and taking them back is treating them well. Turfing them back over the border not so. It is sending a clear message, something our government could learn from... Smash the gangs "Do you agree with withholding water and access to a bathroom? handcuffs and ankles bound? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Certainly looks like ICE are putting in the work "Trouble is the cock ups have already started. ICE agents recently grabbed an American citizen - a military veteran - the reason given was that he "looked hispanic". He was handcuffed and threatened and was not believed as he had no ID on him. Also they did not have a warrant for the raid. The raid was at a factory and workers rather than criminals were rounded up. There may be a case for a more robust policing of the immigration situation in the states but acting like the Gestapo is not the way forward. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Certainly looks like ICE are putting in the work
Trouble is the cock ups have already started. ICE agents recently grabbed an American citizen - a military veteran - the reason given was that he "looked hispanic". He was handcuffed and threatened and was not believed as he had no ID on him. Also they did not have a warrant for the raid. The raid was at a factory and workers rather than criminals were rounded up.
There may be a case for a more robust policing of the immigration situation in the states but acting like the Gestapo is not the way forward."This was always going to be the case. Innocents rounded up for the crime of ‘looking foreign’ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. I’m happy to deport illegal migrants. We should also accept our own criminals from abroad. Shamima Begum, for example." Is she an illegal migrant? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. I’m happy to deport illegal migrants. We should also accept our own criminals from abroad. Shamima Begum, for example. Is she an illegal migrant? " She’s a suspected criminal, no? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. I’m happy to deport illegal migrants. We should also accept our own criminals from abroad. Shamima Begum, for example. Is she an illegal migrant? She’s a suspected criminal, no? " Is she an illegal migrant into her current country? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. I’m happy to deport illegal migrants. We should also accept our own criminals from abroad. Shamima Begum, for example. Is she an illegal migrant? She’s a suspected criminal, no? Is she an illegal migrant into her current country?" The point you’re either swerving or failing to understand is that everyone wants nations to deal with their own ‘problema’ except when we have a problem like Begum, we wash our hands of it. (And I never claimed she was an illegal migrant - I specifically used the word ‘criminal’ referring to her) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm excited for the change! The last four year's have been crap. I can't wait to see what lies are exposed. " Me too.Jan 6th,and a previous election,to start with. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. I’m happy to deport illegal migrants. We should also accept our own criminals from abroad. Shamima Begum, for example. Is she an illegal migrant? She’s a suspected criminal, no? Is she an illegal migrant into her current country? The point you’re either swerving or failing to understand is that everyone wants nations to deal with their own ‘problema’ except when we have a problem like Begum, we wash our hands of it. (And I never claimed she was an illegal migrant - I specifically used the word ‘criminal’ referring to her)" I'm swerving nothing, your comment was that you were happy to deport illegal migrants, you then mentioned one individual. My question remains my old fruit...us she an illegal migrant in whichever country she currently resides? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Certainly looks like ICE are putting in the work
Trouble is the cock ups have already started. ICE agents recently grabbed an American citizen - a military veteran - the reason given was that he "looked hispanic". He was handcuffed and threatened and was not believed as he had no ID on him. Also they did not have a warrant for the raid. The raid was at a factory and workers rather than criminals were rounded up.
There may be a case for a more robust policing of the immigration situation in the states but acting like the Gestapo is not the way forward.
This was always going to be the case. Innocents rounded up for the crime of ‘looking foreign’"It’s the family guy “colour chart” meme working in real life…. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Certainly looks like ICE are putting in the work
Trouble is the cock ups have already started. ICE agents recently grabbed an American citizen - a military veteran - the reason given was that he "looked hispanic". He was handcuffed and threatened and was not believed as he had no ID on him. Also they did not have a warrant for the raid. The raid was at a factory and workers rather than criminals were rounded up.
There may be a case for a more robust policing of the immigration situation in the states but acting like the Gestapo is not the way forward.
This was always going to be the case. Innocents rounded up for the crime of ‘looking foreign’
It’s the family guy “colour chart” meme working in real life…. "You're claiming people are being deported who have the legal right to be in US ? I imagine all illegal migrants do 'look foreign' as they are, amazingly enough! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Don't see anything wrong with returning 'illegals' tbh. It's what we in the UK should be doing instead of sitting on our hands for a decade gormlessly watching our borders being violated. As for the mode of transport, does it really matter? If returnees are unruly, then yes handcuffs will be used for everybody's safety. I’m happy to deport illegal migrants. We should also accept our own criminals from abroad. Shamima Begum, for example. Is she an illegal migrant? She’s a suspected criminal, no? Is she an illegal migrant into her current country? The point you’re either swerving or failing to understand is that everyone wants nations to deal with their own ‘problema’ except when we have a problem like Begum, we wash our hands of it. (And I never claimed she was an illegal migrant - I specifically used the word ‘criminal’ referring to her)" she isnt a british citizen so why would we bring her here, she had her citizenship removed the courts even backed the goverment up on this so no she wont be brought back here,criminal or not she isnt a british citizen | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In 1763 Pontiac had the same idea, the illegal immigrants ended up taking over America the land of the Brave." Careful what you wish for! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In 1763 Pontiac had the same idea, the illegal immigrants ended up taking over America the land of the Brave. Careful what you wish for! " History has a horrible habit of repeating itself. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently Mandleson was wrong and his comments were ill judged and he was led astray by an Italian journo type. " So he's shitting himself, as it starmer, lammy and the rest of the those who were daft enough to think that he wouldn't get in again | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently Mandleson was wrong and his comments were ill judged and he was led astray by an Italian journo type. So he's shitting himself, as it starmer, lammy and the rest of the those who were daft enough to think that he wouldn't get in again " If they did that the uk would have just retaliated by rejecting the us choice as uk ambassador… which is why countries don’t do it!! As a diplomatic wonk, I would have loved to have been on the phone call between the president and the danish prime minister….apparently Greenland did come up, and the phone call didn’t go well… the danish read out said the call was “profanity laced” 
So all those people who said trump was just joking… apparently not! Also… have you noticed it’s female leaders he has real issues with! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently Mandleson was wrong and his comments were ill judged and he was led astray by an Italian journo type. So he's shitting himself, as it starmer, lammy and the rest of the those who were daft enough to think that he wouldn't get in again If they did that the uk would have just retaliated by rejecting the us choice as uk ambassador… which is why countries don’t do it!! As a diplomatic wonk, I would have loved to have been on the phone call between the president and the danish prime minister….apparently Greenland did come up, and the phone call didn’t go well… the danish read out said the call was “profanity laced”
So all those people who said trump was just joking… apparently not! Also… have you noticed it’s female leaders he has real issues with! "Is the word tariff a profanity
Greenland is autonomous at a local level and has been pushing for independence for decades, it is a bit rich that the Danish are getting upset that Trump wants Greenland, anyone asked the people of Greenland what they want? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently Mandleson was wrong and his comments were ill judged and he was led astray by an Italian journo type. So he's shitting himself, as it starmer, lammy and the rest of the those who were daft enough to think that he wouldn't get in again If they did that the uk would have just retaliated by rejecting the us choice as uk ambassador… which is why countries don’t do it!! As a diplomatic wonk, I would have loved to have been on the phone call between the president and the danish prime minister….apparently Greenland did come up, and the phone call didn’t go well… the danish read out said the call was “profanity laced”
So all those people who said trump was just joking… apparently not! Also… have you noticed it’s female leaders he has real issues with! "Isn't Melloni one of his closest allies ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently Mandleson was wrong and his comments were ill judged and he was led astray by an Italian journo type. So he's shitting himself, as it starmer, lammy and the rest of the those who were daft enough to think that he wouldn't get in again If they did that the uk would have just retaliated by rejecting the us choice as uk ambassador… which is why countries don’t do it!! As a diplomatic wonk, I would have loved to have been on the phone call between the president and the danish prime minister….apparently Greenland did come up, and the phone call didn’t go well… the danish read out said the call was “profanity laced”
So all those people who said trump was just joking… apparently not! Also… have you noticed it’s female leaders he has real issues with!
Isn't Melloni one of his closest allies ?"She licks his hoop practically so of course he is ok with her | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love that France has said perhaps they and other EU countries should station soldiers / planes / ships there to boost its defence lol "Well why not Europe and the uk can't keep it's borders open indefinitely allowing millions of people to enter their country of choice, otherwise what's the point of borders and passports? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently Mandleson was wrong and his comments were ill judged and he was led astray by an Italian journo type. So he's shitting himself, as it starmer, lammy and the rest of the those who were daft enough to think that he wouldn't get in again If they did that the uk would have just retaliated by rejecting the us choice as uk ambassador… which is why countries don’t do it!! As a diplomatic wonk, I would have loved to have been on the phone call between the president and the danish prime minister….apparently Greenland did come up, and the phone call didn’t go well… the danish read out said the call was “profanity laced”
So all those people who said trump was just joking… apparently not! Also… have you noticed it’s female leaders he has real issues with!
Is the word tariff a profanity
Greenland is autonomous at a local level and has been pushing for independence for decades, it is a bit rich that the Danish are getting upset that Trump wants Greenland, anyone asked the people of Greenland what they want? "yeah and they have told America what to do as well. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently Mandleson was wrong and his comments were ill judged and he was led astray by an Italian journo type. So he's shitting himself, as it starmer, lammy and the rest of the those who were daft enough to think that he wouldn't get in again If they did that the uk would have just retaliated by rejecting the us choice as uk ambassador… which is why countries don’t do it!! As a diplomatic wonk, I would have loved to have been on the phone call between the president and the danish prime minister….apparently Greenland did come up, and the phone call didn’t go well… the danish read out said the call was “profanity laced”
So all those people who said trump was just joking… apparently not! Also… have you noticed it’s female leaders he has real issues with!
Is the word tariff a profanity
Greenland is autonomous at a local level and has been pushing for independence for decades, it is a bit rich that the Danish are getting upset that Trump wants Greenland, anyone asked the people of Greenland what they want? yeah and they have told America what to do as well."Well that is debatable if you are referencing the poll that was conducted that said 85% said no to becoming part of the US? The poll was a sample of 497 people which is 0.8%, I'm not sure I would bet my house on the result of that poll. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Apparently Mandleson was wrong and his comments were ill judged and he was led astray by an Italian journo type. So he's shitting himself, as it starmer, lammy and the rest of the those who were daft enough to think that he wouldn't get in again If they did that the uk would have just retaliated by rejecting the us choice as uk ambassador… which is why countries don’t do it!! As a diplomatic wonk, I would have loved to have been on the phone call between the president and the danish prime minister….apparently Greenland did come up, and the phone call didn’t go well… the danish read out said the call was “profanity laced”
So all those people who said trump was just joking… apparently not! Also… have you noticed it’s female leaders he has real issues with!
Is the word tariff a profanity
Greenland is autonomous at a local level and has been pushing for independence for decades, it is a bit rich that the Danish are getting upset that Trump wants Greenland, anyone asked the people of Greenland what they want? yeah and they have told America what to do as well.
Well that is debatable if you are referencing the poll that was conducted that said 85% said no to becoming part of the US? The poll was a sample of 497 people which is 0.8%, I'm not sure I would bet my house on the result of that poll."I like him he tells you what he thinking even if it upsets people, and it was a bit unfair the way he got blamed for COVID | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm excited for the change! The last four year's have been crap. I can't wait to see what lies are exposed. " You like the idea of eroding democracy, exacting revenge and retribution on your political opponents. Dissenting voices are forced out of office and then persecuted. Creating an oligarchy run by unelected billionaires. Interesting world view you live in…. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Imagine if the EU gets tariffs but not the UK, I think some people would explode ! "It would be utterly hilarious, lmao!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Imagine if the EU gets tariffs but not the UK, I think some people would explode ! "Well SKS has a chance to keep the UK out of the firing line and only got that chance due to not being in the EU. Hope he succeeds but will be difficult while at the same time trying to get closer to the EU | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Mexico caves in within a day and agrees to new border controls and supervision. Looks like a clear Trump win." Mexico got what they wanted which is finally a commitment to put in a proper effort and stop illegal guns coming across the border from the us (Mexico actually fully wants the anti trust exemption for gun manufacturers removed) If it was a full win why is everything on hold for a month? I think Trump has misjudged the Canada situation badly… all of his comments and the tariffs has brought the nation together and given Trudeau some rest bite! so we will see what the off ramp is, and he will claim the win! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Mexico caves in within a day and agrees to new border controls and supervision. Looks like a clear Trump win. Mexico got what they wanted which is finally a commitment to put in a proper effort and stop illegal guns coming across the border from the us (Mexico actually fully wants the anti trust exemption for gun manufacturers removed) If it was a full win why is everything on hold for a month? I think Trump has misjudged the Canada situation badly… all of his comments and the tariffs has brought the nation together and given Trudeau some rest bite! so we will see what the off ramp is, and he will claim the win! " I disagree, I think he has played a very poor hand for short term support. If he took a leaf out of the talks with Mexico he might have been in a better position than nowhere to turn to. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
