FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Rudakubana why was he not stopped

Jump to newest
 

By *otMe66 OP   Man
13 hours ago

Terra Firma

The number of missed chances to stop this evil individual is appalling.

I'm also conflicted over government / police lack of transparency in relation to the information known.

They knew he was reported to the counter terrorism programme, Prevent, 3 times. They had evidence he was expressing interest in school shootings, in the London Bridge attack, the IRA, MI5 and the Middle East. He made ricin and had a terrorist training manual. He attacked and injured a fellow pupil and was visited by police 5 times for his violent behaviour.

I'm not convinced the case would have been prejudiced had the police - government announced possible terrorist links. That level of transparency could have played a part to quell the riots, the rumours did the opposite and people were guessing rightly in some cases his background.

I have read many times early on in investigations that there are links to terrorism, or details of a persons background, my question is why the lack of transparency and why did it take months to add making ricin and owning terrorist documents to the list charges....

What a mess

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
12 hours ago

Bedford

Does not leaving every stone unturned mean the current governments responsibility aswell. Also will they investigate the the involvement of the source of rumours in Pakistan. Were Labour allegely involved in firing up rumors and conjuring up riots to draw out far right wing out in the open, thus making Starmer the hero of the situation and gain political points.

Will we ever get the truth? Because the truth matters for those murdered and injured.

Starmer claims credit for anti terrorism prosecutions 14 years ago so why are we still dealing with home grown terrorism today? Turn his stone.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
12 hours ago

Bedford

Was the Pakistan source of rumours an attempt to prejudice the case an free the perpetrator.

Who was the killers handler?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *estivalMan
12 hours ago

borehamwood


"The number of missed chances to stop this evil individual is appalling.

I'm also conflicted over government / police lack of transparency in relation to the information known.

They knew he was reported to the counter terrorism programme, Prevent, 3 times. They had evidence he was expressing interest in school shootings, in the London Bridge attack, the IRA, MI5 and the Middle East. He made ricin and had a terrorist training manual. He attacked and injured a fellow pupil and was visited by police 5 times for his violent behaviour.

I'm not convinced the case would have been prejudiced had the police - government announced possible terrorist links. That level of transparency could have played a part to quell the riots, the rumours did the opposite and people were guessing rightly in some cases his background.

I have read many times early on in investigations that there are links to terrorism, or details of a persons background, my question is why the lack of transparency and why did it take months to add making ricin and owning terrorist documents to the list charges....

What a mess "

who knows why it was all hidden,my guess is people are covering there arses,also like to know who let the evil little shitbags parents stay here and where there backgrounds fully known,the little fuckwit has been an evil little shit from the age of 12 or 13 by sounds of it,he has learnt it from somewhere

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arakiss12TV/TS
12 hours ago

Bedford


"The number of missed chances to stop this evil individual is appalling.

I'm also conflicted over government / police lack of transparency in relation to the information known.

They knew he was reported to the counter terrorism programme, Prevent, 3 times. They had evidence he was expressing interest in school shootings, in the London Bridge attack, the IRA, MI5 and the Middle East. He made ricin and had a terrorist training manual. He attacked and injured a fellow pupil and was visited by police 5 times for his violent behaviour.

I'm not convinced the case would have been prejudiced had the police - government announced possible terrorist links. That level of transparency could have played a part to quell the riots, the rumours did the opposite and people were guessing rightly in some cases his background.

I have read many times early on in investigations that there are links to terrorism, or details of a persons background, my question is why the lack of transparency and why did it take months to add making ricin and owning terrorist documents to the list charges....

What a mess who knows why it was all hidden,my guess is people are covering there arses,also like to know who let the evil little shitbags parents stay here and where there backgrounds fully known,the little fuckwit has been an evil little shit from the age of 12 or 13 by sounds of it,he has learnt it from somewhere"

I agree, and I think he had a handler.

The reason being he kept getting let off the hook. Someone was pulling strings.

I don't think we'll ever get the truth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostindreamsMan
12 hours ago

London

[Removed by poster at 21/01/25 15:56:19]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostindreamsMan
12 hours ago

London


"

They knew he was reported to the counter terrorism programme, Prevent, 3 times. They had evidence he was expressing interest in school shootings, in the London Bridge attack, the IRA, MI5 and the Middle East. He made ricin and had a terrorist training manual. He attacked and injured a fellow pupil and was visited by police 5 times for his violent behaviour.

"

Pretty sure they must have some threshold beyond which they usually take action. Not sure expressing interest in school shootings, terror attacks itself warrants action. But making ricin and buying weapons should have raised the alarms immediately. Signs of terrible incompetence from the departments whose job is to ensure security of people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
11 hours ago

in Lancashire


"

They knew he was reported to the counter terrorism programme, Prevent, 3 times. They had evidence he was expressing interest in school shootings, in the London Bridge attack, the IRA, MI5 and the Middle East. He made ricin and had a terrorist training manual. He attacked and injured a fellow pupil and was visited by police 5 times for his violent behaviour.

Pretty sure they must have some threshold beyond which they usually take action. Not sure expressing interest in school shootings, terror attacks itself warrants action. But making ricin and buying weapons should have raised the alarms immediately. Signs of terrible incompetence from the departments whose job is to ensure security of people."

Certainly had the system known about the ricin and the IS stuff I'm pretty sure they would have acted, I really do hope that till he was arrested for his vile acts at the kids club that those red flags weren't known..

There's been a cpl of youngsters locked up lately who were it seems like minded in relation to planning terrorist actions etc..

The amount of kids below any such radars be that these issues or those into grooming others to commit suicide on top of the ones involved in abuse is a sad sign of the times..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top