Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Most people exaggerate on their CV, but deviousness is not a good trait in a Chancellor of the Exchequer."  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should she be sacked for her CV lies!" Time will take care of her incompetence and sadly many people will suffer, some will die whether it be pensioners freezing or farmers taking their own life's I suspect that she will be the cause of many deaths and she won't give a dam | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should she be sacked for her CV lies! Time will take care of her incompetence and sadly many people will suffer, some will die whether it be pensioners freezing or farmers taking their own life's I suspect that she will be the cause of many deaths and she won't give a dam " Blimey, you make her sound like a Tory. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should she be sacked for her CV lies! Time will take care of her incompetence and sadly many people will suffer, some will die whether it be pensioners freezing or farmers taking their own life's I suspect that she will be the cause of many deaths and she won't give a dam Blimey, you make her sound like a Tory." You think that because she's labour she's inherently good as opposed to tory who's inherently bad Your wilful naivety is stunning | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should she be sacked for her CV lies! Time will take care of her incompetence and sadly many people will suffer, some will die whether it be pensioners freezing or farmers taking their own life's I suspect that she will be the cause of many deaths and she won't give a dam Blimey, you make her sound like a Tory. You think that because she's labour she's inherently good as opposed to tory who's inherently bad Your wilful naivety is stunning " Not at all. Just used to 14 years of government openly showing contempt for British people. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Her CV has nothing to do with her Role. Was Hunt an economist and a doctor?." no, Hunt wasn’t and nor did he claim to be. Reeves had put ‘Economist’ on her LinkedIn profile, then changed it to ‘Retail Banking’…… she has clearly tried to embellish her previous experience. If I lied on my CV/Linkedin profile, I would be sacked. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should she be sacked for her CV lies! Time will take care of her incompetence and sadly many people will suffer, some will die whether it be pensioners freezing or farmers taking their own life's I suspect that she will be the cause of many deaths and she won't give a dam Blimey, you make her sound like a Tory. You think that because she's labour she's inherently good as opposed to tory who's inherently bad Your wilful naivety is stunning " yes that’s normally his stance on things like this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should she be sacked for her CV lies! Time will take care of her incompetence and sadly many people will suffer, some will die whether it be pensioners freezing or farmers taking their own life's I suspect that she will be the cause of many deaths and she won't give a dam Blimey, you make her sound like a Tory." No… she Liebour 100%.. the same Liebour who broke my Grandfather’s heart after WW2. Refused to honour the War Bonds he purchased. His only Son was killed by the Germans in September 44 and that’s how the bastards repaid him | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should she be sacked for her CV lies! Time will take care of her incompetence and sadly many people will suffer, some will die whether it be pensioners freezing or farmers taking their own life's I suspect that she will be the cause of many deaths and she won't give a dam Blimey, you make her sound like a Tory. You think that because she's labour she's inherently good as opposed to tory who's inherently bad Your wilful naivety is stunning yes that’s normally his stance on things like this " Let's try to keep on track instead of personal jibes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Her CV has nothing to do with her Role. Was Hunt an economist and a doctor?. no, Hunt wasn’t and nor did he claim to be. Reeves had put ‘Economist’ on her LinkedIn profile, then changed it to ‘Retail Banking’…… she has clearly tried to embellish her previous experience. If I lied on my CV/Linkedin profile, I would be sacked." Lol you don't think Starmer knew her background. That he has been conned into giving her the role. It really is comedy gold in here at times. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Her CV has nothing to do with her Role. Was Hunt an economist and a doctor?. no, Hunt wasn’t and nor did he claim to be. Reeves had put ‘Economist’ on her LinkedIn profile, then changed it to ‘Retail Banking’…… she has clearly tried to embellish her previous experience. If I lied on my CV/Linkedin profile, I would be sacked. Lol you don't think Starmer knew her background. That he has been conned into giving her the role. It really is comedy gold in here at times." Well that even worse isn’t it. If you or I lied on a CV and an employer found out it a sackable offence. Read any job application, always a section stating none true statements is grounds for dismissal. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Her CV has nothing to do with her Role. Was Hunt an economist and a doctor?. no, Hunt wasn’t and nor did he claim to be. Reeves had put ‘Economist’ on her LinkedIn profile, then changed it to ‘Retail Banking’…… she has clearly tried to embellish her previous experience. If I lied on my CV/Linkedin profile, I would be sacked. Lol you don't think Starmer knew her background. That he has been conned into giving her the role. It really is comedy gold in here at times. Well that even worse isn’t it. If you or I lied on a CV and an employer found out it a sackable offence. Read any job application, always a section stating none true statements is grounds for dismissal. " You think she applied for a job, handed over her CV and lied during an interview. lol the desperation is strong on this one. People have been commenting on ministerial appointments having no experience in their given roles for decades. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Her CV has nothing to do with her Role. Was Hunt an economist and a doctor?. no, Hunt wasn’t and nor did he claim to be. Reeves had put ‘Economist’ on her LinkedIn profile, then changed it to ‘Retail Banking’…… she has clearly tried to embellish her previous experience. If I lied on my CV/Linkedin profile, I would be sacked. Lol you don't think Starmer knew her background. That he has been conned into giving her the role. It really is comedy gold in here at times. Well that even worse isn’t it. If you or I lied on a CV and an employer found out it a sackable offence. Read any job application, always a section stating none true statements is grounds for dismissal. You think she applied for a job, handed over her CV and lied during an interview. lol the desperation is strong on this one. People have been commenting on ministerial appointments having no experience in their given roles for decades. " People are calling out the mistruths and deception to convince the public she is far more experienced than she is. Not a good look for Labour, again, especially with the imaginary 22billion blackhole, removing WFA, taxing education, piling on NI payments to business that ultimately impacts working people with lower pay rise expectations and higher product costs and Labour spending so much she needs to go back for more! I Maybe a little more scrutiny around her experience would have been wise and what the country would expect given the responsibility she has. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Her CV has nothing to do with her Role. Was Hunt an economist and a doctor?. no, Hunt wasn’t and nor did he claim to be. Reeves had put ‘Economist’ on her LinkedIn profile, then changed it to ‘Retail Banking’…… she has clearly tried to embellish her previous experience. If I lied on my CV/Linkedin profile, I would be sacked. Lol you don't think Starmer knew her background. That he has been conned into giving her the role. It really is comedy gold in here at times. Well that even worse isn’t it. If you or I lied on a CV and an employer found out it a sackable offence. Read any job application, always a section stating none true statements is grounds for dismissal. You think she applied for a job, handed over her CV and lied during an interview. lol the desperation is strong on this one. People have been commenting on ministerial appointments having no experience in their given roles for decades. People are calling out the mistruths and deception to convince the public she is far more experienced than she is. Not a good look for Labour, again, especially with the imaginary 22billion blackhole, removing WFA, taxing education, piling on NI payments to business that ultimately impacts working people with lower pay rise expectations and higher product costs and Labour spending so much she needs to go back for more! I Maybe a little more scrutiny around her experience would have been wise and what the country would expect given the responsibility she has. " Nice word salad. Does a chancellor of the exchequer need to have a background in economics. If so why hasn’t that criteria been applied before. If not then why has it become a problem for this particular chancellor. Apart from the fact it’s Liebour of course. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Her CV has nothing to do with her Role. Was Hunt an economist and a doctor?. no, Hunt wasn’t and nor did he claim to be. Reeves had put ‘Economist’ on her LinkedIn profile, then changed it to ‘Retail Banking’…… she has clearly tried to embellish her previous experience. If I lied on my CV/Linkedin profile, I would be sacked. Lol you don't think Starmer knew her background. That he has been conned into giving her the role. It really is comedy gold in here at times. Well that even worse isn’t it. If you or I lied on a CV and an employer found out it a sackable offence. Read any job application, always a section stating none true statements is grounds for dismissal. You think she applied for a job, handed over her CV and lied during an interview. lol the desperation is strong on this one. People have been commenting on ministerial appointments having no experience in their given roles for decades. People are calling out the mistruths and deception to convince the public she is far more experienced than she is. Not a good look for Labour, again, especially with the imaginary 22billion blackhole, removing WFA, taxing education, piling on NI payments to business that ultimately impacts working people with lower pay rise expectations and higher product costs and Labour spending so much she needs to go back for more! I Maybe a little more scrutiny around her experience would have been wise and what the country would expect given the responsibility she has. " Yep, spot on with the imaginary 22billion blackhole Apparently the 22billion blackhole is the cause of all this snow on its way too.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Her CV has nothing to do with her Role. Was Hunt an economist and a doctor?. no, Hunt wasn’t and nor did he claim to be. Reeves had put ‘Economist’ on her LinkedIn profile, then changed it to ‘Retail Banking’…… she has clearly tried to embellish her previous experience. If I lied on my CV/Linkedin profile, I would be sacked. Lol you don't think Starmer knew her background. That he has been conned into giving her the role. It really is comedy gold in here at times. Well that even worse isn’t it. If you or I lied on a CV and an employer found out it a sackable offence. Read any job application, always a section stating none true statements is grounds for dismissal. You think she applied for a job, handed over her CV and lied during an interview. lol the desperation is strong on this one. People have been commenting on ministerial appointments having no experience in their given roles for decades. " So it ok be duplicitous? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Her CV has nothing to do with her Role. Was Hunt an economist and a doctor?. no, Hunt wasn’t and nor did he claim to be. Reeves had put ‘Economist’ on her LinkedIn profile, then changed it to ‘Retail Banking’…… she has clearly tried to embellish her previous experience. If I lied on my CV/Linkedin profile, I would be sacked. Lol you don't think Starmer knew her background. That he has been conned into giving her the role. It really is comedy gold in here at times. Well that even worse isn’t it. If you or I lied on a CV and an employer found out it a sackable offence. Read any job application, always a section stating none true statements is grounds for dismissal. You think she applied for a job, handed over her CV and lied during an interview. lol the desperation is strong on this one. People have been commenting on ministerial appointments having no experience in their given roles for decades. People are calling out the mistruths and deception to convince the public she is far more experienced than she is. Not a good look for Labour, again, especially with the imaginary 22billion blackhole, removing WFA, taxing education, piling on NI payments to business that ultimately impacts working people with lower pay rise expectations and higher product costs and Labour spending so much she needs to go back for more! I Maybe a little more scrutiny around her experience would have been wise and what the country would expect given the responsibility she has. Nice word salad. Does a chancellor of the exchequer need to have a background in economics. If so why hasn’t that criteria been applied before. If not then why has it become a problem for this particular chancellor. Apart from the fact it’s Liebour of course." It appears you’re misunderstanding what ‘word salad’ means. You have also conflated the issue of job qualifications with the question of integrity. This discussion isn’t about whether a chancellor must have specific credentials, more about concerns over her honesty and transparency, especially when her role affords her great authority that impacts every single person in the country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should she be sacked for her CV lies! Time will take care of her incompetence and sadly many people will suffer, some will die whether it be pensioners freezing or farmers taking their own life's I suspect that she will be the cause of many deaths and she won't give a dam Blimey, you make her sound like a Tory." It does sound like the stereotypical Tory but I am assured she is Labour and one of the alleged grown ups. Unfortunately she is also responsible for the budget which is not turning out to be the pro growth budget promised. Apart from freezing pensioners I see today a multitude of retailers all saying that prices will rise and jobs will be cut all as a direct result of the budget. Perhaps she is actually a Tory working undercover | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should she be sacked for her CV lies! Time will take care of her incompetence and sadly many people will suffer, some will die whether it be pensioners freezing or farmers taking their own life's I suspect that she will be the cause of many deaths and she won't give a dam Blimey, you make her sound like a Tory. You think that because she's labour she's inherently good as opposed to tory who's inherently bad Your wilful naivety is stunning yes that’s normally his stance on things like this Let's try to keep on track instead of personal jibes. " ******************************** 'personal jibes'..? Nah... It's a simple observation. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
