Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump shouldn't have all that power " Why not, Biden did.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I thought this forum was about swinging, not another country's politics." Don't read it then if you don't like it... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I think he’s great, wish we had politicians that said how it is instead of worrying about the PC brigade " I'm glad our politicians don't sexually abuse women and don't get convicted of fraud. Not great qualities in a leader. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I think he’s great, wish we had politicians that said how it is instead of worrying about the PC brigade I'm glad our politicians don't sexually abuse women and don't get convicted of fraud. Not great qualities in a leader." No they just abuse the country | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I think he’s great, wish we had politicians that said how it is instead of worrying about the PC brigade I'm glad our politicians don't sexually abuse women and don't get convicted of fraud. Not great qualities in a leader. No they just abuse the country " True. Trump does all three. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president" ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war " In fairness to Trump. He did try to kick things off in North Korea and in the middle east. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"kick things off in North Korea ..." Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war " 600,000? When? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president" Please explain. Did Biden start a war? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"kick things off in North Korea ... Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that." Good point. Not only is Trump aligned with Putin, but Kim Jong Un. The three unstable amigos. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump shouldn't have all that power Why not, Biden did...." No one person should have that power | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"kick things off in North Korea ... Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that. Good point. Not only is Trump aligned with Putin, but Kim Jong Un. The three unstable amigos. " Visiting a president means he is aligned with him? Does that mean Macron is also aligned with Putin? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump is great. Will be an amazing President. Let’s see how the US economy does compared to the UK/EU economies over the next four years." His choices for government are at best mediocre. The depressing thing is that MAGA will be around for at least the next 12+ years, due to The Supreme Court & how embedded MAGA is. Looks like he will tear up Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, which will cut funding to clean energy research & development, & manufacture in The USA; watch China gain more speed ahead of The USA in clean energy (which is the tech of the future)...Trump is championing 19th energy in the 21st century; USA will be left behind in clean & future tech as a result | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"kick things off in North Korea ... Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that. Good point. Not only is Trump aligned with Putin, but Kim Jong Un. The three unstable amigos. Visiting a president means he is aligned with him? Does that mean Macron is also aligned with Putin?" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Also had a love in with Milei from Argentina this week. kick things off in North Korea ... Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that. Good point. Not only is Trump aligned with Putin, but Kim Jong Un. The three unstable amigos. Visiting a president means he is aligned with him? Does that mean Macron is also aligned with Putin?" What's wrong with that? Milei is doing a fairly good job bringing Argentina slowly back in track after the socialists fucked the country. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war " I think 77 Million Americans will disagree with you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war I think 77 Million Americans will disagree with you " ...and the rest would agree with me....what's your point? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?" ....I see you've an oan watcher | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I don't trust him. Look at his cabinet picks. All unqualified yes-men picked to shore-up whatever policies and laws Trump likes. It's like watching some El Presidente in a Banana Republic." It will end in the same chaos and instability as last time. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher " That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war I think 77 Million Americans will disagree with you ...and the rest would agree with me....what's your point?" Doubt anyone would agree with you, especially Americans | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?" That's the Covid line. They attribute every death to him  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"kick things off in North Korea ..." "Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that." "Good point. Not only is Trump aligned with Putin, but Kim Jong Un. The three unstable amigos." So you attack Trump for being belligerent to North Korea, then when it's pointed out that he didn't do that you attack him for being friendly with North Korea. It's almost like you have a pathological hatred of Trump and will just use anything to attack him. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?" ...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war I think 77 Million Americans will disagree with you ...and the rest would agree with me....what's your point? Doubt anyone would agree with you, especially Americans " ...how many votes did Harris get...are you that nieve? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? That's the Covid line. They attribute every death to him "Ah I see  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? That's the Covid line. They attribute every death to him
Ah I see "...why do I doubt that...?  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know?" That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. " ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree?" Did the 600,000 people die because of him? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?" They didn't die because of him. HE KILLED THEM. I'd give up now if I were you mate  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?" ...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? " If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him? They didn't die because of him. HE KILLED THEM. I'd give up now if I were you mate "I guess Trump went around to every house and sneezed in their faces  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?" ...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president" If he does the things he says he is going to do, then it will impact me. Simple. Also, I used to be a very regular visitor to the US, and lived there for several years, and the atmosphere there now (open animosity towards immigrants and certain races), has become poisonous. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. " In such a sparsely populated country, he could have kept deaths substantially lower. Look at Australia for example. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him? They didn't die because of him. HE KILLED THEM. I'd give up now if I were you mate
I guess Trump went around to every house and sneezed in their faces "Next best thing. He allowed people to do whatever the hell they wanted, and discouraged jabs … whilst sending batches of vaccines to his boss in Russia | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree?" Yes. Fair assessment | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...?" They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?" Freedom of speech | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. In such a sparsely populated country, he could have kept deaths substantially lower. Look at Australia for example. " Not a trump supporter, but I disagree USA is the most obese country on the globe (41.9% record obesity at time of pandemic) and 71% are overweight, highest inequality and extreme poverty. Elsewhere I read United States ranks last in overall health system performance in 2024 The U.S. has the lowest life expectancy at birth, the highest death rates for avoidable or treatable conditions, the highest maternal and infant mortality, and among the highest suicide rates. The U.S. has the highest rate of people with multiple chronic conditions and an obesity rate nearly twice the OECD average. Citizens in bad shape hence the higher death rates. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him? They didn't die because of him. HE KILLED THEM. I'd give up now if I were you mate
I guess Trump went around to every house and sneezed in their faces
Next best thing. He allowed people to do whatever the hell they wanted, and discouraged jabs … whilst sending batches of vaccines to his boss in Russia "A politician giving freedom to people to do what they want is a bad thing? I am sorry to say this. There are millions of people in the world who don't see politicians as their daddy/mommy.
I don't think Trump discouraged people from taking vaccines either:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-56424614 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?" ...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv" So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president" trump dropped a staggering 74,354 bombs on other countries in his first term, eclipsing both bush and obama in their first terms. jimmy carter dropped zero bombs. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views." ...false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.." Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?" ...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. " It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?" ...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. " If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?" ...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree?" Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?" Their protests undoubtedly contributed to the spread, and probably caused some deaths. Still not the same as the president of the country actively dismantling the protection of his citizens | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president" Totally agree. He was the first President to visit North Korea (Rocket Man). That completely calmed down after. The democrats would have bombed them. I still don’t think the Ukraine war would have started on his watch. The democrats are the party of War, Disorder and identity politics. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. In such a sparsely populated country, he could have kept deaths substantially lower. Look at Australia for example. Not a trump supporter, but I disagree USA is the most obese country on the globe (41.9% record obesity at time of pandemic) and 71% are overweight, highest inequality and extreme poverty. Elsewhere I read United States ranks last in overall health system performance in 2024 The U.S. has the lowest life expectancy at birth, the highest death rates for avoidable or treatable conditions, the highest maternal and infant mortality, and among the highest suicide rates. The U.S. has the highest rate of people with multiple chronic conditions and an obesity rate nearly twice the OECD average. Citizens in bad shape hence the higher death rates. " Those are factors for why people were at risk. But the lack of control was the biggest factor. I think you’ll find that the Australian population are not 100 per cent young fit and healthy. But they shut the borders and quarantined arrivals (nationals returning home) very effectively, keeping the spread down | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president Totally agree. He was the first President to visit North Korea (Rocket Man). That completely calmed down after. The democrats would have bombed them. I still don’t think the Ukraine war would have started on his watch. The democrats are the party of War, Disorder and identity politics. " The dems would have bombed North Korea? Well, they have just been in power, and they didn’t. Only dems start wars? What about bush senior? And junior? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. " ...well they died under his watch... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths? Their protests undoubtedly contributed to the spread, and probably caused some deaths. Still not the same as the president of the country actively dismantling the protection of his citizens " What do you mean by actively dismantling protection of the citizens? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch..." Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway." "...well they died under his watch..." Over 12 million Americans have died whilst Biden has been in power, and more are dying every day. Are all of those deaths Biden's fault just because they happened under his watch? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president trump dropped a staggering 74,354 bombs on other countries in his first term, eclipsing both bush and obama in their first terms. jimmy carter dropped zero bombs." As of May this year Israel dropped a reported 70,000 tonnes of USA bombs on Gaza. 60% homes destroyed, 43,000 killed, including 30000 women and children. 2 million homeless. Biden should join Netenyahu at The Hague. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president trump dropped a staggering 74,354 bombs on other countries in his first term, eclipsing both bush and obama in their first terms. jimmy carter dropped zero bombs. As of May this year Israel dropped a reported 70,000 tonnes of USA bombs on Gaza. 60% homes destroyed, 43,000 killed, including 30000 women and children. 2 million homeless. Biden should join Netenyahu at The Hague. " ...trump says...hold my beer | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over 12 million Americans have died whilst Biden has been in power, and more are dying every day. Are all of those deaths Biden's fault just because they happened under his watch?" ...avoidable deaths? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works." ...it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories " That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"kick things off in North Korea ... Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that. Good point. Not only is Trump aligned with Putin, but Kim Jong Un. The three unstable amigos. So you attack Trump for being belligerent to North Korea, then when it's pointed out that he didn't do that you attack him for being friendly with North Korea. It's almost like you have a pathological hatred of Trump and will just use anything to attack him." You have me mixed up with someone else there. I haven't said he was belligerent to north Korea.  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?" ...didn't you read what I said?... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over 12 million Americans have died whilst Biden has been in power, and more are dying every day. Are all of those deaths Biden's fault just because they happened under his watch?" Not the same thing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump quite rightly won the last election but we have to face facts, he failed as president between 2016-2020 " I’m curious to hear your specific examples of how Trump failed the people of the USA. Broad stroke claims need concrete details. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump quite rightly won the last election but we have to face facts, he failed as president between 2016-2020 I’m curious to hear your specific examples of how Trump failed the people of the USA. Broad stroke claims need concrete details." The electorate voted him out, they are the best judge, glad to help | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president" Kept Kim Jong Un onside without firing a shot. The leaders around the world...specially "tribal" ones respect strength. Even Putin probably would not have started on Trumps watch. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president Kept Kim Jong Un onside without firing a shot. The leaders around the world...specially "tribal" ones respect strength. Even Putin probably would not have started on Trumps watch." Hilarious, i quite like trump but putin doesn’t give a shit about trump | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president Kept Kim Jong Un onside without firing a shot. The leaders around the world...specially "tribal" ones respect strength. Even Putin probably would not have started on Trumps watch. Hilarious, i quite like trump but putin doesn’t give a shit about trump " Told you that personally did he? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president Kept Kim Jong Un onside without firing a shot. The leaders around the world...specially "tribal" ones respect strength. Even Putin probably would not have started on Trumps watch. Hilarious, i quite like trump but putin doesn’t give a shit about trump Told you that personally did he? " Hey, welcome back, no, his actions speak louder than his words | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president Kept Kim Jong Un onside without firing a shot. The leaders around the world...specially "tribal" ones respect strength. Even Putin probably would not have started on Trumps watch. Hilarious, i quite like trump but putin doesn’t give a shit about trump Told you that personally did he? Hey, welcome back, no, his actions speak louder than his words " Ahh, body language expert too. You're full of surprises | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president Kept Kim Jong Un onside without firing a shot. The leaders around the world...specially "tribal" ones respect strength. Even Putin probably would not have started on Trumps watch. Hilarious, i quite like trump but putin doesn’t give a shit about trump Told you that personally did he? Hey, welcome back, no, his actions speak louder than his words Ahh, body language expert too. You're full of surprises " Hello there, you don’t need to be an expert, but thanks for that compliment | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Kept Kim Jong Un onside without firing a shot. The leaders around the world...specially "tribal" ones respect strength. Even Putin probably would not have started on Trumps watch." the fly in the oinment there is the 10's of thousands of north korean troops fighting for the russians in ukraine .... perhaps trump has advocated for this happening 🤷 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president Kept Kim Jong Un onside without firing a shot. The leaders around the world...specially "tribal" ones respect strength. Even Putin probably would not have started on Trumps watch. Hilarious, i quite like trump but putin doesn’t give a shit about trump Told you that personally did he? Hey, welcome back, no, his actions speak louder than his words Ahh, body language expert too. You're full of surprises Hello there, you don’t need to be an expert, but thanks for that compliment "I admire the art, not the artist | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president Kept Kim Jong Un onside without firing a shot. The leaders around the world...specially "tribal" ones respect strength. Even Putin probably would not have started on Trumps watch. Hilarious, i quite like trump but putin doesn’t give a shit about trump Told you that personally did he? Hey, welcome back, no, his actions speak louder than his words Ahh, body language expert too. You're full of surprises Hello there, you don’t need to be an expert, but thanks for that compliment
I admire the art, not the artist "Indeed, | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?...didn't you read what I said?..." I read and it didn't make any sense | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? " the vaccine saved everyone dont forget and protected the grannies 😂 | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? the vaccine saved everyone dont forget and protected the grannies 😂" Unfortunately not everyone but it definitely saved millions , | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"kick things off in North Korea ... Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that. Good point. Not only is Trump aligned with Putin, but Kim Jong Un. The three unstable amigos. " unstable are the posts like this | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"unstable are the posts like this " Yoda! .... Is that you? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"kick things off in North Korea ..." "Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that." "Good point. Not only is Trump aligned with Putin, but Kim Jong Un. The three unstable amigos." "So you attack Trump for being belligerent to North Korea, then when it's pointed out that he didn't do that you attack him for being friendly with North Korea. It's almost like you have a pathological hatred of Trump and will just use anything to attack him." "You have me mixed up with someone else there. I haven't said he was belligerent to north Korea." It's you I'm quoting above. Someone posted that Trump hadn't started a war, and you replied "He did try to kick things off in North Korea". | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?...didn't you read what I said?... I read and it didn't make any sense" ...ok.. As the leader of the country, he wouldn't wear a mask...the science said it helped prevent the spread He advanced particular drugs that had not been even tested on the virus. He held rallies indoors even though he was told it was dangerous... He played down the danger of the virus, even though he told Bob Woodward that it was airborne and extremely dangerous..do you want more? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?...didn't you read what I said?... I read and it didn't make any sense...ok.. As the leader of the country, he wouldn't wear a mask...the science said it helped prevent the spread He advanced particular drugs that had not been even tested on the virus. He held rallies indoors even though he was told it was dangerous... He played down the danger of the virus, even though he told Bob Woodward that it was airborne and extremely dangerous..do you want more? " He didn't wear mask doesn't mean rest of the country should follow him. I thought the West has moved on from that kind of politics. Others are reasonable points. But none of that proves he killed 600,000 people. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?...didn't you read what I said?... I read and it didn't make any sense...ok.. As the leader of the country, he wouldn't wear a mask...the science said it helped prevent the spread He advanced particular drugs that had not been even tested on the virus. He held rallies indoors even though he was told it was dangerous... He played down the danger of the virus, even though he told Bob Woodward that it was airborne and extremely dangerous..do you want more? He didn't wear mask doesn't mean rest of the country should follow him. I thought the West has moved on from that kind of politics. Others are reasonable points. But none of that proves he killed 600,000 people. " ...he's the leader...lead by example mabye..? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?" It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?...didn't you read what I said?... I read and it didn't make any sense...ok.. As the leader of the country, he wouldn't wear a mask...the science said it helped prevent the spread He advanced particular drugs that had not been even tested on the virus. He held rallies indoors even though he was told it was dangerous... He played down the danger of the virus, even though he told Bob Woodward that it was airborne and extremely dangerous..do you want more? " but masks didn’t stop covid and the danger of the virus was exaggerated | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?...didn't you read what I said?... I read and it didn't make any sense...ok.. As the leader of the country, he wouldn't wear a mask...the science said it helped prevent the spread He advanced particular drugs that had not been even tested on the virus. He held rallies indoors even though he was told it was dangerous... He played down the danger of the virus, even though he told Bob Woodward that it was airborne and extremely dangerous..do you want more? but masks didn’t stop covid and the danger of the virus was exaggerated " The Pfizer mRNA vaccines are transported from their manufacturing site in Kalamazoo, Michigan, and delivered worldwide Great Job USA | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof" If Democrats were ruling at that time, the numbers would have been 600,000 lower? I would love to see the calculations done there. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof If Democrats were ruling at that time, the numbers would have been 600,000 lower? I would love to see the calculations done there." id rather see how many actually died of covid who didn’t have health issues or who wherent very old in the U.K. hardly anyone died of anything other than covid hmmmm | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Trump quite rightly won the last election but we have to face facts, he failed as president between 2016-2020 I’m curious to hear your specific examples of how Trump failed the people of the USA. Broad stroke claims need concrete details." He never gives details or backs up his statements | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof If Democrats were ruling at that time, the numbers would have been 600,000 lower? I would love to see the calculations done there." I can’t see where anyone posted that deaths would have been 600,000 lower under dems. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?...didn't you read what I said?... I read and it didn't make any sense...ok.. As the leader of the country, he wouldn't wear a mask...the science said it helped prevent the spread He advanced particular drugs that had not been even tested on the virus. He held rallies indoors even though he was told it was dangerous... He played down the danger of the virus, even though he told Bob Woodward that it was airborne and extremely dangerous..do you want more? but masks didn’t stop covid and the danger of the virus was exaggerated " Masks did help, and no, dangers weren’t exaggerated. Try explaining the exaggeration to people who died from it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof If Democrats were ruling at that time, the numbers would have been 600,000 lower? I would love to see the calculations done there. I can’t see where anyone posted that deaths would have been 600,000 lower under dems. " The whole argument started because someone said Trump killed 600,000 Americans. If he is the cause of all the deaths, then a different political party ruling must have resulted in those deaths not happening. That's how causality works. If that's not the case, Trump didn't kill them all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof If Democrats were ruling at that time, the numbers would have been 600,000 lower? I would love to see the calculations done there. I can’t see where anyone posted that deaths would have been 600,000 lower under dems. The whole argument started because someone said Trump killed 600,000 Americans. If he is the cause of all the deaths, then a different political party ruling must have resulted in those deaths not happening. That's how causality works. If that's not the case, Trump didn't kill them all." I agree. He killed a lot of them though, through dangerous, reckless bullshit ideas. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"kick things off in North Korea ... Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that. Good point. Not only is Trump aligned with Putin, but Kim Jong Un. The three unstable amigos. unstable are the posts like this " And the holy trinity of Putin, Kim Jong Un and Trump are what, sane, logical and stable? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof If Democrats were ruling at that time, the numbers would have been 600,000 lower? I would love to see the calculations done there." It was numbers done by two independent government agencies… the CDC (centre for disease control) and the NIH (national institute for health) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president" Didn't he say he would end the war in Ukraine in day 1 after winning the election z not after inauguration? Ergo he's still a lying cnut | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?...didn't you read what I said?... I read and it didn't make any sense...ok.. As the leader of the country, he wouldn't wear a mask...the science said it helped prevent the spread He advanced particular drugs that had not been even tested on the virus. He held rallies indoors even though he was told it was dangerous... He played down the danger of the virus, even though he told Bob Woodward that it was airborne and extremely dangerous..do you want more? but masks didn’t stop covid and the danger of the virus was exaggerated Masks did help, and no, dangers weren’t exaggerated. Try explaining the exaggeration to people who died from it. " no they didn’t wach the covid enquiry in the USA the two meter rule was pathetic aswell | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"kick things off in North Korea ... Trump actually got invited into North Korea, and set foot there. No other Western leader has managed that. Good point. Not only is Trump aligned with Putin, but Kim Jong Un. The three unstable amigos. unstable are the posts like this And the holy trinity of Putin, Kim Jong Un and Trump are what, sane, logical and stable?" I see Scholz has been “talking to Putin” as well. We all know what that means. Scholz is a Russian asset. And Starmer was recently seen hanging out with Lukashenko and Erdogan in Azerbaijan, another corrupt petro-state. They can be seen in the same photos. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?...didn't you read what I said?... I read and it didn't make any sense...ok.. As the leader of the country, he wouldn't wear a mask...the science said it helped prevent the spread He advanced particular drugs that had not been even tested on the virus. He held rallies indoors even though he was told it was dangerous... He played down the danger of the virus, even though he told Bob Woodward that it was airborne and extremely dangerous..do you want more? but masks didn’t stop covid and the danger of the virus was exaggerated Masks did help, and no, dangers weren’t exaggerated. Try explaining the exaggeration to people who died from it. no they didn’t wach the covid enquiry in the USA the two meter rule was pathetic aswell " Well maybe we will get it better next time What has BLM "Black Life's Matter" got anything to do with this? Please explain | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof If Democrats were ruling at that time, the numbers would have been 600,000 lower? I would love to see the calculations done there. It was numbers done by two independent government agencies… the CDC (centre for disease control) and the NIH (national institute for health) " Impossible. I did a Google search. US total Covid death toll reached 600,000 in June 2021. That's 5 months after Biden took over. Even if you could prove that the democrats would have ensured 0 covid deaths, it's very far from "roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information?...he mishandled the pandemic..600,000 Americans died on his watch...didn't you know? That happened in every country. Death per capita in the US is slightly above some European countries and below a few European countries. ...he mishandled covid...a lot of people died needlessly...don't you agree? Did the 600,000 people die because of him?...are you familiar with the phrase "the buck stops here"...? Refusing to wear a mask. It will be gone by easter. It will be gone when the weather gets warmer. Hydroxichloroquin. Inject disinfectant Holding superspreader rallies. Do you think they died because of him...? If you say that 600,000 people were killed by him, what you really mean is that 0 people would have died if someone else was president. We both know it wasn't true. And the biggest get-together which happened around Covid was probably the BLM protests. Is it fair to say BLM killed thousands of people?...but they weren't the president...do you see the difference..?.how many took covid advice from members of blm...? They took advice from blm to go into the streets in thousands. Shouldn't blm be responsible for so many deaths?...again...blm wasn't president...they were just a bunch of people protesting a cop murdering a black guy on live tv So anyone other than the president can get people together during a pandemic and somehow they are magically absolved of all responsibility? Looks more like you are trying to set different standards for different people based on your political views....false equivalency...he was the president...name a few blm "leaders"... I can't.. Blm as an organisation can take responsibility. If COVID happens again and kemi who isn't a president says that all people should go out in groups, would you say it's fine?...they're not an organisation...trump was the president ffs...people (sadly) listened to him ,and died as a result. It's a simple question. Is it a good or bad idea to bring people in masses together during covid?...absolutely not...yet the sitting president of the United States continued to hold superspreader rallies against all medical advice. If that's the case, do you admit that what blm did was a mistake and were responsible for numerous deaths?...absolutely...anyone who held mass gatherings or didn't follow medical advice is responsible....don't you agree? Yes I agree. As long as you set same standards for everyone, I am fine with it. The 600,000 number was an exaggeration anyway. ...well they died under his watch... Over a hundred thousand people died most European countries. Are the leaders at that time responsible for all these deaths? I don't think that's how causality works....it is if you don't advocate for scientific precautions, and actively promote baseless theories That's quite a jump in ocnclusion without any rational chain of reasoning. Hundreds of thousands of people died of COVID in European countries. Are the political leaders around that time responsible for those deaths?...didn't you read what I said?... I read and it didn't make any sense...ok.. As the leader of the country, he wouldn't wear a mask...the science said it helped prevent the spread He advanced particular drugs that had not been even tested on the virus. He held rallies indoors even though he was told it was dangerous... He played down the danger of the virus, even though he told Bob Woodward that it was airborne and extremely dangerous..do you want more? " And the drugs that were 'world leading', the first to be approved turned out to be great didn't they | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof If Democrats were ruling at that time, the numbers would have been 600,000 lower? I would love to see the calculations done there. I can’t see where anyone posted that deaths would have been 600,000 lower under dems. The whole argument started because someone said Trump killed 600,000 Americans. If he is the cause of all the deaths, then a different political party ruling must have resulted in those deaths not happening. That's how causality works. If that's not the case, Trump didn't kill them all." ...and there we have it..."trump didn't kill them all "...hahaha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof If Democrats were ruling at that time, the numbers would have been 600,000 lower? I would love to see the calculations done there. I can’t see where anyone posted that deaths would have been 600,000 lower under dems. The whole argument started because someone said Trump killed 600,000 Americans. If he is the cause of all the deaths, then a different political party ruling must have resulted in those deaths not happening. That's how causality works. If that's not the case, Trump didn't kill them all....and there we have it..."trump didn't kill them all "...hahaha " Given that US death toll reached 600,000 five months after Biden took over, don't you think your number looks funny at this point? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Mar a lago bought for $10 mil valued at between 1-2 billion now not a bad mark up lol" ...thats what he says its worth....his lawyers valued it at 18 million | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Mar a lago bought for $10 mil valued at between 1-2 billion now not a bad mark up lol...thats what he says its worth....his lawyers valued it at 18 million " no he doesn’t it’s from the biggest palm beach property estate agent and it wasn’t his lawyers that came up with that 18 million tho | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Convicted criminal that's all I gotta say the guys a convicted criminal " People don't seem to mind, as long as he bangs on about immigrants, spunks billions on a pointless wall, pollutes as much as possible and tries to remove access to healthcare for millions of Americans. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Mar a lago bought for $10 mil valued at between 1-2 billion now not a bad mark up lol...thats what he says its worth....his lawyers valued it at 18 million " It’s not really his lawyers that value at 18 m… it’s the local “zoning” committee Because it’s zoned for business rather than residential , he is not allowed to build any houses on the land | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Mar a lago bought for $10 mil valued at between 1-2 billion now not a bad mark up lol...thats what he says its worth....his lawyers valued it at 18 million no he doesn’t it’s from the biggest palm beach property estate agent and it wasn’t his lawyers that came up with that 18 million tho " Key words being “estate agents” as in building houses on the land… which he is not allowed to do | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Mar a lago bought for $10 mil valued at between 1-2 billion now not a bad mark up lol...thats what he says its worth....his lawyers valued it at 18 million It’s not really his lawyers that value at 18 m… it’s the local “zoning” committee Because it’s zoned for business rather than residential , he is not allowed to build any houses on the land " ...no....they valued it at 18 million so as to keep the taxes down...he's a cheapskate... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Mar a lago bought for $10 mil valued at between 1-2 billion now not a bad mark up lol...thats what he says its worth....his lawyers valued it at 18 million no he doesn’t it’s from the biggest palm beach property estate agent and it wasn’t his lawyers that came up with that 18 million tho Key words being “estate agents” as in building houses on the land… which he is not allowed to do " so are you saying it’s not worth that much _abio then you sticking with the 18 mil lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Mar a lago bought for $10 mil valued at between 1-2 billion now not a bad mark up lol...thats what he says its worth....his lawyers valued it at 18 million no he doesn’t it’s from the biggest palm beach property estate agent and it wasn’t his lawyers that came up with that 18 million tho Key words being “estate agents” as in building houses on the land… which he is not allowed to do so are you saying it’s not worth that much _abio then you sticking with the 18 mil lol" ...thats what Trump’s lawyers valued it at....surely he wouldn't lie? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Mar a lago bought for $10 mil valued at between 1-2 billion now not a bad mark up lol...thats what he says its worth....his lawyers valued it at 18 million no he doesn’t it’s from the biggest palm beach property estate agent and it wasn’t his lawyers that came up with that 18 million tho Key words being “estate agents” as in building houses on the land… which he is not allowed to do so are you saying it’s not worth that much _abio then you sticking with the 18 mil lol...thats what Trump’s lawyers valued it at....surely he wouldn't lie?" it wasn’t his lawyers | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Mar a lago bought for $10 mil valued at between 1-2 billion now not a bad mark up lol...thats what he says its worth....his lawyers valued it at 18 million no he doesn’t it’s from the biggest palm beach property estate agent and it wasn’t his lawyers that came up with that 18 million tho Key words being “estate agents” as in building houses on the land… which he is not allowed to do so are you saying it’s not worth that much _abio then you sticking with the 18 mil lol...thats what Trump’s lawyers valued it at....surely he wouldn't lie? it wasn’t his lawyers " ...who was it then? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A palm beach appraiser on for the New York attorney in a civil case against trump " ...wrong...try again. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A palm beach appraiser on for the New York attorney in a civil case against trump ...wrong...try again. " ffs use Google you try again mate | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"A palm beach appraiser on for the New York attorney in a civil case against trump ...wrong...try again. ffs use Google you try again mate " ...you're probably using maga Google...a palm beach appraiser, to determine how much tax trump paid on the property. Trumps lawyers agreed at the time..engoron had nothing to do with it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Up the Trump" They don't like it up 'um | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter." Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. " The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good?" You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise?" Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? " How was Trump last run as President disastrous? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous?" ...do you suffer from amnesia?... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous?" What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point?" No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ?" I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up?" No I’ll let you explain please. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up?" Perhaps you need to educate yourself further on the last eight years in the US as experienced by US voters. You might then comprehend better the results of the latest US elections, which you seem to be struggling with. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? No I’ll let you explain please. " This is getting so weird it's surreal. There simply isn't the space here for even scratching the surface. You really should go and read up. 1. Pulled the US out of the Paris climate accord. 2. Said that Nazis were "some very fine people", plus other racist rhetoric, this saw a sharp rise in hate crime. 3. Overturned rowe Vs wade. 1 in three American women no longer have control over their own body. 4. Told people Covid was no worse than the flu, then that injecting disinfectant might work. 5. 2.9 million Americans lost their jobs under his watch. Worst of any American president. 6. Inflamed tensions in the middle east by recognising golan heights as Israeli. Moved the US embassy to Jerusalem. 7. Gave himself tax breaks 8. Spent billions on a pointless wall. 9. Keystone pipeline The list goes on and on and on and on. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Why do people get so worried? He never started the war like every other president ..he didn't need to...he killed 600,000 Americans and wrecked the economy...who needs a war 600,000? When?....I see you've an oan watcher That was an honest question. Saying that he killed 600,000 Americans is quite a statement. Do you have a source for this information? It would be roughly the number of excess deaths due to COVID because of the Trump administration response… or lack thereof If Democrats were ruling at that time, the numbers would have been 600,000 lower? I would love to see the calculations done there. I can’t see where anyone posted that deaths would have been 600,000 lower under dems. The whole argument started because someone said Trump killed 600,000 Americans. If he is the cause of all the deaths, then a different political party ruling must have resulted in those deaths not happening. That's how causality works. If that's not the case, Trump didn't kill them all....and there we have it..."trump didn't kill them all "...hahaha " He cost lives. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? Perhaps you need to educate yourself further on the last eight years in the US as experienced by US voters. You might then comprehend better the results of the latest US elections, which you seem to be struggling with." I am not struggling with the results of the last election. Not sure if you've mixed me up with someone else or not there. But wasn't me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? Perhaps you need to educate yourself further on the last eight years in the US as experienced by US voters. You might then comprehend better the results of the latest US elections, which you seem to be struggling with." It’s fine using the term disastrous but why did he win such a huge majority again? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? Perhaps you need to educate yourself further on the last eight years in the US as experienced by US voters. You might then comprehend better the results of the latest US elections, which you seem to be struggling with. It’s fine using the term disastrous but why did he win such a huge majority again?" Now you're asking the right question! That is an interesting discussion point. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? Perhaps you need to educate yourself further on the last eight years in the US as experienced by US voters. You might then comprehend better the results of the latest US elections, which you seem to be struggling with. It’s fine using the term disastrous but why did he win such a huge majority again? Now you're asking the right question! That is an interesting discussion point." So what the answer then two tone, elaborate us all with your existence US political knowledge. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? No I’ll let you explain please. This is getting so weird it's surreal. There simply isn't the space here for even scratching the surface. You really should go and read up. 1. Pulled the US out of the Paris climate accord. 2. Said that Nazis were "some very fine people", plus other racist rhetoric, this saw a sharp rise in hate crime. 3. Overturned rowe Vs wade. 1 in three American women no longer have control over their own body. 4. Told people Covid was no worse than the flu, then that injecting disinfectant might work. 5. 2.9 million Americans lost their jobs under his watch. Worst of any American president. 6. Inflamed tensions in the middle east by recognising golan heights as Israeli. Moved the US embassy to Jerusalem. 7. Gave himself tax breaks 8. Spent billions on a pointless wall. 9. Keystone pipeline The list goes on and on and on and on. " There seems to be an awful lot of rambling subjective nonsense here which is just very badly informed. The Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v Wade was a decision of the US Supreme Court. Trump had nothing to do with it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? Perhaps you need to educate yourself further on the last eight years in the US as experienced by US voters. You might then comprehend better the results of the latest US elections, which you seem to be struggling with. It’s fine using the term disastrous but why did he win such a huge majority again? Now you're asking the right question! That is an interesting discussion point. So what the answer then two tone, elaborate us all with your existence US political knowledge. " There's probably no single answer. There are a multitude of things. I think this is where the interesting debate is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? No I’ll let you explain please. This is getting so weird it's surreal. There simply isn't the space here for even scratching the surface. You really should go and read up. 1. Pulled the US out of the Paris climate accord. 2. Said that Nazis were "some very fine people", plus other racist rhetoric, this saw a sharp rise in hate crime. 3. Overturned rowe Vs wade. 1 in three American women no longer have control over their own body. 4. Told people Covid was no worse than the flu, then that injecting disinfectant might work. 5. 2.9 million Americans lost their jobs under his watch. Worst of any American president. 6. Inflamed tensions in the middle east by recognising golan heights as Israeli. Moved the US embassy to Jerusalem. 7. Gave himself tax breaks 8. Spent billions on a pointless wall. 9. Keystone pipeline The list goes on and on and on and on. There seems to be an awful lot of rambling subjective nonsense here which is just very badly informed. The Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v Wade was a decision of the US Supreme Court. Trump had nothing to do with it. " Trumps picks for the supreme court enabled it. Solid work Trump. None of the points are subjective. There are a very small selection of examples. The other chap said he was unaware of the things that happened under the Trump presidency and wanted some examples. Again, I would suggest going and reading up instead of asking for a super brief summary on a forum. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? No I’ll let you explain please. This is getting so weird it's surreal. There simply isn't the space here for even scratching the surface. You really should go and read up. 1. Pulled the US out of the Paris climate accord. 2. Said that Nazis were "some very fine people", plus other racist rhetoric, this saw a sharp rise in hate crime. 3. Overturned rowe Vs wade. 1 in three American women no longer have control over their own body. 4. Told people Covid was no worse than the flu, then that injecting disinfectant might work. 5. 2.9 million Americans lost their jobs under his watch. Worst of any American president. 6. Inflamed tensions in the middle east by recognising golan heights as Israeli. Moved the US embassy to Jerusalem. 7. Gave himself tax breaks 8. Spent billions on a pointless wall. 9. Keystone pipeline The list goes on and on and on and on. There seems to be an awful lot of rambling subjective nonsense here which is just very badly informed. The Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v Wade was a decision of the US Supreme Court. Trump had nothing to do with it. " Keep thinking that one through … And let’s remind ourselves of trump taking full responsibility for that decision … | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Quite apart from the 34 felony convictions ( a felony being something you go to Big Jail for, not a couple of days in the lockup like someone in the Dukes Of Hazzard), apart from the catalogue of thousands of lies (and please don't come back with the school playground "Yerbat thass politishuns innit") I'm finding it absolutely astonishing that anybody here has any time at all for a man who not only seriously advised people to inject bleach to cure Covid, after he'd pretended there was no such thing, but who then boasts about getting away with sexual assault and who has been called a r*pist by a judge in open court. There are actually people on this forum who think r*pe is ok. Seriously? And bad-word-filter, you really ought to make an exception to that use of the filter. Trump is a genius. The US is going to take off during his second Presidency. The first time was a disaster, since then he's been done for multiple counts of fraud, and for sexual abuse. What makes you think this time will somehow magically be good? You obviously feel that you have some invaluable insight into the plight of the average American voter that isn’t available to the average American voter. What forms the basis of this expertise? Let's get to that later, and stick to the statement you made. What makes you think that this time around he will be better than his last disastrous run at being president? Surely not his aforementioned criminal activities? How was Trump last run as President disastrous? What kind of question is that! Your genuinely don't know, or are you trying to make a point? No please explain why his last presidential was disastrous? In which way ? I'm not sure how anyone can be so blissfully unaware of his last term as president. Do you really want to learn from a random person on a swingers forum with a few comments or do you want to go and read up? No I’ll let you explain please. This is getting so weird it's surreal. There simply isn't the space here for even scratching the surface. You really should go and read up. 1. Pulled the US out of the Paris climate accord. 2. Said that Nazis were "some very fine people", plus other racist rhetoric, this saw a sharp rise in hate crime. 3. Overturned rowe Vs wade. 1 in three American women no longer have control over their own body. 4. Told people Covid was no worse than the flu, then that injecting disinfectant might work. 5. 2.9 million Americans lost their jobs under his watch. Worst of any American president. 6. Inflamed tensions in the middle east by recognising golan heights as Israeli. Moved the US embassy to Jerusalem. 7. Gave himself tax breaks 8. Spent billions on a pointless wall. 9. Keystone pipeline The list goes on and on and on and on. There seems to be an awful lot of rambling subjective nonsense here which is just very badly informed. The Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v Wade was a decision of the US Supreme Court. Trump had nothing to do with it. " ....didn't trump boast that he was responsible..? Are you saying your hero lied to you..? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I'm glad that the Americans voted Trump as their president, it's a shame the UK didn't follow their lead " ...you mean he was up for election in Britain too? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I'm glad that the Americans voted Trump as their president, it's a shame the UK didn't follow their lead " Trump is not running for president in the UK. The UK doesn't have a president. Apart from that, still wouldn't be great to have someone who enjoys sexual assault and committing fraud in charge. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I'm glad that the Americans voted Trump as their president, it's a shame the UK didn't follow their lead Trump is not running for president in the UK. The UK doesn't have a president. Apart from that, still wouldn't be great to have someone who enjoys sexual assault and committing fraud in charge. " Where is your evidence that he ra*ed someone? Until I see actual concrete proof I take that claim with a tiny bit of salt and I don't want to hear hearsay from someone else | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
