Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Where can I find the footage?" You can't. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Where can I find the footage? You can't." So what makes you sure she misheard? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Where can I find the footage? You can't. So what makes you sure she misheard?" The fact that the police have reported the Telegraph to the independent press standards organisation makes me think the footage backs up their version. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Where can I find the footage? You can't. So what makes you sure she misheard? The fact that the police have reported the Telegraph to the independent press standards organisation makes me think the footage backs up their version." Do you think they'll share the footage with IPSO? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage." Another telegraph fail | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail " Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already?" Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar " I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas?" I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read " You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question?" I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it " This is a forum, answering questions and conversing is kinda how it works. Do you think the police will share the footage with IPSO? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it This is a forum, answering questions and conversing is kinda how it works. Do you think the police will share the footage with IPSO?" No idea | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it This is a forum, answering questions and conversing is kinda how it works. Do you think the police will share the footage with IPSO? No idea " If they never share it or show it, how do you know it confirms that she is lying? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it " The police have lodge a complaint on the reporting, at no point have they said anyone was lying. For clarity Pearson said: "she was told by the police who came to her home it was over a “non-crime hate incident”. The police say: the officer stated that the complaint had "gone down as an incident or offence of potentially inciting racial hatred online". I think it is reasonable to get the statement from the police mixed up with what she said she was told, it is coming down to semantics to move this way from the poorly managed incident. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it The police have lodge a complaint on the reporting, at no point have they said anyone was lying. For clarity Pearson said: "she was told by the police who came to her home it was over a “non-crime hate incident”. The police say: the officer stated that the complaint had "gone down as an incident or offence of potentially inciting racial hatred online". I think it is reasonable to get the statement from the police mixed up with what she said she was told, it is coming down to semantics to move this way from the poorly managed incident." I don't think it's reasonable for a journalist from a national newspaper to publish her misunderstanding and then go around various news media channels repeating the line. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it The police have lodge a complaint on the reporting, at no point have they said anyone was lying. For clarity Pearson said: "she was told by the police who came to her home it was over a “non-crime hate incident”. The police say: the officer stated that the complaint had "gone down as an incident or offence of potentially inciting racial hatred online". I think it is reasonable to get the statement from the police mixed up with what she said she was told, it is coming down to semantics to move this way from the poorly managed incident. I don't think it's reasonable for a journalist from a national newspaper to publish her misunderstanding and then go around various news media channels repeating the line." If it was a misunderstanding she would not have known until the recording was made available to her. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it The police have lodge a complaint on the reporting, at no point have they said anyone was lying. For clarity Pearson said: "she was told by the police who came to her home it was over a “non-crime hate incident”. The police say: the officer stated that the complaint had "gone down as an incident or offence of potentially inciting racial hatred online". I think it is reasonable to get the statement from the police mixed up with what she said she was told, it is coming down to semantics to move this way from the poorly managed incident." if it’s a non crime they have no right knocking on her door piss off and do what the tax payer pays them for | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it The police have lodge a complaint on the reporting, at no point have they said anyone was lying. For clarity Pearson said: "she was told by the police who came to her home it was over a “non-crime hate incident”. The police say: the officer stated that the complaint had "gone down as an incident or offence of potentially inciting racial hatred online". I think it is reasonable to get the statement from the police mixed up with what she said she was told, it is coming down to semantics to move this way from the poorly managed incident.if it’s a non crime they have no right knocking on her door piss off and do what the tax payer pays them for " According to the officers bodycam footage she wasn't told it was a non crime. “At no stage during the short interaction between the woman and our officers was she informed that the report being investigated was being treated as a non-crime hate incident. To suggest otherwise is wholly inaccurate and misleading. “As the public would expect, we have body worn video of this interaction which entirely supports our position in this respect.” | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it The police have lodge a complaint on the reporting, at no point have they said anyone was lying. For clarity Pearson said: "she was told by the police who came to her home it was over a “non-crime hate incident”. The police say: the officer stated that the complaint had "gone down as an incident or offence of potentially inciting racial hatred online". I think it is reasonable to get the statement from the police mixed up with what she said she was told, it is coming down to semantics to move this way from the poorly managed incident.if it’s a non crime they have no right knocking on her door piss off and do what the tax payer pays them for According to the officers superiors she wasn't told it was a non crime. “At no stage during the short interaction between the woman and our officers was she informed that the report being investigated was being treated as a non-crime hate incident. To suggest otherwise is wholly inaccurate and misleading. “As the public would expect, we have body worn video of this interaction which entirely supports our position in this respect.”" FTFY | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it The police have lodge a complaint on the reporting, at no point have they said anyone was lying. For clarity Pearson said: "she was told by the police who came to her home it was over a “non-crime hate incident”. The police say: the officer stated that the complaint had "gone down as an incident or offence of potentially inciting racial hatred online". I think it is reasonable to get the statement from the police mixed up with what she said she was told, it is coming down to semantics to move this way from the poorly managed incident.if it’s a non crime they have no right knocking on her door piss off and do what the tax payer pays them for According to the officers superiors she wasn't told it was a non crime. “At no stage during the short interaction between the woman and our officers was she informed that the report being investigated was being treated as a non-crime hate incident. To suggest otherwise is wholly inaccurate and misleading. “As the public would expect, we have body worn video of this interaction which entirely supports our position in this respect.” FTFY" Sorry I'm not down with the kids, what does FTFY mean ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it The police have lodge a complaint on the reporting, at no point have they said anyone was lying. For clarity Pearson said: "she was told by the police who came to her home it was over a “non-crime hate incident”. The police say: the officer stated that the complaint had "gone down as an incident or offence of potentially inciting racial hatred online". I think it is reasonable to get the statement from the police mixed up with what she said she was told, it is coming down to semantics to move this way from the poorly managed incident.if it’s a non crime they have no right knocking on her door piss off and do what the tax payer pays them for According to the officers superiors she wasn't told it was a non crime. “At no stage during the short interaction between the woman and our officers was she informed that the report being investigated was being treated as a non-crime hate incident. To suggest otherwise is wholly inaccurate and misleading. “As the public would expect, we have body worn video of this interaction which entirely supports our position in this respect.” FTFY Sorry I'm not down with the kids, what does FTFY mean ?" Fixed That For You  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It appears that Alison Pearson the Telegraph journalist must have misheard what the police officers said to her according to the officers bodycam footage. Another telegraph fail Why is this a fail? Do you know that the claim will be upheld already? Telegraph ‘journalist ’ is reported by the police to be either deaf or a liar I'll ask again. Why is it a fail? Also, why is journalist in inverted commas? I have explained why it’s a fail earlier, have a read You haven't explained anything. If the complaint isn't upheld then it would be the police who have failed. Unless you know the outcome already, you probably should wait and see. Why haven't you answered my other question? I am not here to answer your questions, allthough I appreciate you want my input, the police have reported that Pearson’s is lying , they have body cam footage to prove it The police have lodge a complaint on the reporting, at no point have they said anyone was lying. For clarity Pearson said: "she was told by the police who came to her home it was over a “non-crime hate incident”. The police say: the officer stated that the complaint had "gone down as an incident or offence of potentially inciting racial hatred online". I think it is reasonable to get the statement from the police mixed up with what she said she was told, it is coming down to semantics to move this way from the poorly managed incident.if it’s a non crime they have no right knocking on her door piss off and do what the tax payer pays them for According to the officers superiors she wasn't told it was a non crime. “At no stage during the short interaction between the woman and our officers was she informed that the report being investigated was being treated as a non-crime hate incident. To suggest otherwise is wholly inaccurate and misleading. “As the public would expect, we have body worn video of this interaction which entirely supports our position in this respect.” FTFY Sorry I'm not down with the kids, what does FTFY mean ? Fixed That For You "Ah I see, changing other peoples posts is a thing in here. Gotcha. As a relative newby in here its always good to know the rules  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One would have thought Essex police would have better things to do, given their appalling record in solving actual crimes." One would have thought a serious journalist would find news to report rather than making up quotes to provoke outrage. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One would have thought Essex police would have better things to do, given their appalling record in solving actual crimes. One would have thought a serious journalist would find news to report rather than making up quotes to provoke outrage." Do you think the statement made to her by the officer and how she interpreted it are clear cut and she is lying? This is not someone saying it is raining outside and the other party claims they said to was glorious sunshine. The words and phrases are very similar. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One would have thought Essex police would have better things to do, given their appalling record in solving actual crimes. One would have thought a serious journalist would find news to report rather than making up quotes to provoke outrage. Do you think the statement made to her by the officer and how she interpreted it are clear cut and she is lying? This is not someone saying it is raining outside and the other party claims they said to was glorious sunshine. The words and phrases are very similar. " She knows exactly what she is doing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One would have thought Essex police would have better things to do, given their appalling record in solving actual crimes. One would have thought a serious journalist would find news to report rather than making up quotes to provoke outrage. Do you think the statement made to her by the officer and how she interpreted it are clear cut and she is lying? This is not someone saying it is raining outside and the other party claims they said to was glorious sunshine. The words and phrases are very similar. She knows exactly what she is doing " That’s interesting. When you spoke to her, did she share anything else? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One would have thought Essex police would have better things to do, given their appalling record in solving actual crimes. One would have thought a serious journalist would find news to report rather than making up quotes to provoke outrage. Do you think the statement made to her by the officer and how she interpreted it are clear cut and she is lying? This is not someone saying it is raining outside and the other party claims they said to was glorious sunshine. The words and phrases are very similar. She knows exactly what she is doing That’s interesting. When you spoke to her, did she share anything else? " Funnily enough when you read what someone writes you don’t actually have to hear what they say. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One would have thought Essex police would have better things to do, given their appalling record in solving actual crimes. One would have thought a serious journalist would find news to report rather than making up quotes to provoke outrage. Do you think the statement made to her by the officer and how she interpreted it are clear cut and she is lying? This is not someone saying it is raining outside and the other party claims they said to was glorious sunshine. The words and phrases are very similar. She knows exactly what she is doing That’s interesting. When you spoke to her, did she share anything else? Funnily enough when you read what someone writes you don’t actually have to hear what they say." What was in her written account that makes you certain she was lying? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One would have thought Essex police would have better things to do, given their appalling record in solving actual crimes. One would have thought a serious journalist would find news to report rather than making up quotes to provoke outrage." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
