Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is to announce an extra £75m to tackle people-smuggling gangs. That’s on top of Sunak’s £500 million to France over three years. £800 million written off on the illegal Rwanda scheme 1000 extra home office case workers, to replace the 1000 working on the Rwanda scheme 5000 vacant paid for buffer hotel rooms at £600k a day and £2.75bn accommodating the migrants that are here 215,900 on the home office asylum list, 63,000 of which were granted right to stay a few weeks ago Add the lawyers, courts, interpreters, and £90m profits announced by Clearsprings for accommodation. This is a good business to be in. " Good sensible approach, no more stupid schemes like Rwanda, he is getting on and doing the job he was elected for | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These gangs operate from outside UK's jurisdiction. I would be surprised if we already didn't know who these gangs are. We just couldn't do anything about it. Just an eyewash to pretend like they are dealing with the problem without fixing the underlying root cause." Exactly! In fact the precise supply chain and routes of dinghies is well known to UK authorities. But the country of manufacture (Turkey), of warehousing (Germany) and eventual use (France) refuse to co-operate in smashing the human trafficking gangs. It's not in their national interest to do so. So labour's extra funding is just more wasted money and time. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. " The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for " You are in agreement then | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then" Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this " How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world?" By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell " They'll lower the bar for granting asylum (just show up) then Hey Presto illegal crossing numbers plummet. Job done. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell They'll lower the bar for granting asylum (just show up) then Hey Presto illegal crossing numbers plummet. Job done." Good solution, that is why they won a huge majority at the last election, to tackle these ‘problems’ even thought they are way down their list of priorities | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell They'll lower the bar for granting asylum (just show up) then Hey Presto illegal crossing numbers plummet. Job done. Good solution, that is why they won a huge majority at the last election, to tackle these ‘problems’ even thought they are way down their list of priorities " Indeed, and it worked so well with prisoner numbers, just fling open the gates and let'em loose. Surprising nobody thought of it before. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell They'll lower the bar for granting asylum (just show up) then Hey Presto illegal crossing numbers plummet. Job done. Good solution, that is why they won a huge majority at the last election, to tackle these ‘problems’ even thought they are way down their list of priorities Indeed, and it worked so well with prisoner numbers, just fling open the gates and let'em loose. Surprising nobody thought of it before." It had to be done, that is why labour were voted in by the electorate, to make sensible but tough decisions, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell " Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. " It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats " That's because we have a first past the post voting system and not proportional representation, they got 14% of the vote and 1% of the seats. Lib Dems got 12% of the vote and 11% of the seats...🤷🏻♂️ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats " That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That's because we have a first past the post voting system and not proportional representation, they got 14% of the vote and 1% of the seats. Lib Dems got 12% of the vote and 11% of the seats...🤷🏻♂️ " And? We have that system for decades, the majority of the electorate are happy with the way it is, no point in crying about the rules because you lost | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. " No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That's because we have a first past the post voting system and not proportional representation, they got 14% of the vote and 1% of the seats. Lib Dems got 12% of the vote and 11% of the seats...🤷🏻♂️ " And if either the Lib Dems or Reform get into power via first past the post neither of them would change it either. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken " It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? " No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken " What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? " The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now " Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. " Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? " Who cares obviously you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now " Okay, that is your view but it is at odds with the evidence I have read. Especially about it being a small scale problem, it is a cross party concern and very high on the list of labours manifesto priorities for change, being 3rd on the list | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That's because we have a first past the post voting system and not proportional representation, they got 14% of the vote and 1% of the seats. Lib Dems got 12% of the vote and 11% of the seats...🤷🏻♂️ And? We have that system for decades, the majority of the electorate are happy with the way it is, no point in crying about the rules because you lost " No one's crying big boy, just not very truthful to pretend it's not a major concern for a lot of people, was pretty much the hot topic on every public debate on tv and radio leading up to the election...the party that wins runs the country for everyone not just their own supporters | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. " You cared enough to say “Labour won because the Tories were shite” | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Okay, that is your view but it is at odds with the evidence I have read. Especially about it being a small scale problem, it is a cross party concern and very high on the list of labours manifesto priorities for change, being 3rd on the list" You’re evidence is wrong it was 7th on the list off labour voters, tbh it is irrelevant anyway . Here are facts for you, The tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration were rejected at the ballot box, they won’t a pathetic 126 seats, the country doesn’t prioritise asylum and immigration, fact | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That's because we have a first past the post voting system and not proportional representation, they got 14% of the vote and 1% of the seats. Lib Dems got 12% of the vote and 11% of the seats...🤷🏻♂️ And? We have that system for decades, the majority of the electorate are happy with the way it is, no point in crying about the rules because you lost No one's crying big boy, just not very truthful to pretend it's not a major concern for a lot of people, was pretty much the hot topic on every public debate on tv and radio leading up to the election...the party that wins runs the country for everyone not just their own supporters " Hardly anyone cares about PR, the only people moaning are the losers | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. " I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Okay, that is your view but it is at odds with the evidence I have read. Especially about it being a small scale problem, it is a cross party concern and very high on the list of labours manifesto priorities for change, being 3rd on the list You’re evidence is wrong it was 7th on the list off labour voters, tbh it is irrelevant anyway . Here are facts for you, The tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration were rejected at the ballot box, they won’t a pathetic 126 seats, the country doesn’t prioritise asylum and immigration, fact " This is my last post on this particular thread, ref “it is not a priority”, we are in danger of simply repeating ourselves. The Home Secretary announced more will be done as soon as they took power, it was a pillar of change in the manifesto, the Labour Party are spending millions on smash the gangs and the country as a whole sees it as an important issue. The Labour Party is prioritising immigration and asylum to bring down costs to the tax payer which runs into billions a year. To say it isn’t a priority to the country is confusing, not so if you think it’s isn’t a priority, which I accept. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Okay, that is your view but it is at odds with the evidence I have read. Especially about it being a small scale problem, it is a cross party concern and very high on the list of labours manifesto priorities for change, being 3rd on the list You’re evidence is wrong it was 7th on the list off labour voters, tbh it is irrelevant anyway . Here are facts for you, The tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration were rejected at the ballot box, they won’t a pathetic 126 seats, the country doesn’t prioritise asylum and immigration, fact This is my last post on this particular thread, ref “it is not a priority”, we are in danger of simply repeating ourselves. The Home Secretary announced more will be done as soon as they took power, it was a pillar of change in the manifesto, the Labour Party are spending millions on smash the gangs and the country as a whole sees it as an important issue. The Labour Party is prioritising immigration and asylum to bring down costs to the tax payer which runs into billions a year. To say it isn’t a priority to the country is confusing, not so if you think it’s isn’t a priority, which I accept. " It isn’t a priority, far bigger problems facing this country, the tories turned a relatively small problem into their main priority because they mismanaged the situation, that is one of the reasons they were thrashed at the election . Reform made it their number one priority, they were also thrashed at the election, nothing more to add | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters " Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no?" The one voted in 2016, 8 years ago, the one that was a referendum and not a general election? No, it’s been a disaster, false equivalence | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no? The one voted in 2016, 8 years ago, the one that was a referendum and not a general election? No, it’s been a disaster, false equivalence " Now I'm confused whether the electorate can make best decisions. Which is it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no? The one voted in 2016, 8 years ago, the one that was a referendum and not a general election? No, it’s been a disaster, false equivalence Now I'm confused whether the electorate can make best decisions. Which is it?" Do you know the difference between a referendum and a general election, the way they work, the issues that people vote on? Anyway, the only important general election is the last one, the electorate have spoken | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no? The one voted in 2016, 8 years ago, the one that was a referendum and not a general election? No, it’s been a disaster, false equivalence Now I'm confused whether the electorate can make best decisions. Which is it?" It’s not difficult 2019 the country voted conservative, 2024 the country voted labour, ergo the country changed its mind. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no? The one voted in 2016, 8 years ago, the one that was a referendum and not a general election? No, it’s been a disaster, false equivalence Now I'm confused whether the electorate can make best decisions. Which is it? Do you know the difference between a referendum and a general election, the way they work, the issues that people vote on? Anyway, the only important general election is the last one, the electorate have spoken " Well yes, I get the difference, but it's the same electorate. So how can they be wrong on one occasion and right on another, it doesn't make sense. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no? The one voted in 2016, 8 years ago, the one that was a referendum and not a general election? No, it’s been a disaster, false equivalence Now I'm confused whether the electorate can make best decisions. Which is it? Do you know the difference between a referendum and a general election, the way they work, the issues that people vote on? Anyway, the only important general election is the last one, the electorate have spoken Well yes, I get the difference, but it's the same electorate. So how can they be wrong on one occasion and right on another, it doesn't make sense." People change their mind, get back to me in 5 years | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no? The one voted in 2016, 8 years ago, the one that was a referendum and not a general election? No, it’s been a disaster, false equivalence Now I'm confused whether the electorate can make best decisions. Which is it? Do you know the difference between a referendum and a general election, the way they work, the issues that people vote on? Anyway, the only important general election is the last one, the electorate have spoken Well yes, I get the difference, but it's the same electorate. So how can they be wrong on one occasion and right on another, it doesn't make sense. People change their mind, get back to me in 5 years " I think they already have judging from Starmer's polling LOL  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no? The one voted in 2016, 8 years ago, the one that was a referendum and not a general election? No, it’s been a disaster, false equivalence Now I'm confused whether the electorate can make best decisions. Which is it? Do you know the difference between a referendum and a general election, the way they work, the issues that people vote on? Anyway, the only important general election is the last one, the electorate have spoken Well yes, I get the difference, but it's the same electorate. So how can they be wrong on one occasion and right on another, it doesn't make sense. People change their mind, get back to me in 5 years I think they already have judging from Starmer's polling LOL "Who cares about opinion polls 5 years before an election, they are irrelevant LOL, do you take any notice off the current Brexit polls | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats " This is the source for your claim: https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49594-general-election-2024-what-are-the-most-important-issues-for-voters In this list, education, crime, transport, welfare benefits, family and childcare all rank below immigration. Does that mean labour should stop giving a fuck about these? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no? The one voted in 2016, 8 years ago, the one that was a referendum and not a general election? No, it’s been a disaster, false equivalence Now I'm confused whether the electorate can make best decisions. Which is it? Do you know the difference between a referendum and a general election, the way they work, the issues that people vote on? Anyway, the only important general election is the last one, the electorate have spoken Well yes, I get the difference, but it's the same electorate. So how can they be wrong on one occasion and right on another, it doesn't make sense. People change their mind, get back to me in 5 years I think they already have judging from Starmer's polling LOL
Who cares about opinion polls 5 years before an election, they are irrelevant LOL, do you take any notice off the current Brexit polls "Polls serve a purpose, that's why they exist. SKS has suffered the biggest drop in approval ratings post election of any PM. It'll only get worse - for him, the Labour Party, and sadly the nation. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell They'll lower the bar for granting asylum (just show up) then Hey Presto illegal crossing numbers plummet. Job done. Good solution, that is why they won a huge majority at the last election, to tackle these ‘problems’ even thought they are way down their list of priorities Indeed, and it worked so well with prisoner numbers, just fling open the gates and let'em loose. Surprising nobody thought of it before. It had to be done, that is why labour were voted in by the electorate, to make sensible but tough decisions, " Labour weren't voted in.....the Tories were voted out!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell " 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell They'll lower the bar for granting asylum (just show up) then Hey Presto illegal crossing numbers plummet. Job done. Good solution, that is why they won a huge majority at the last election, to tackle these ‘problems’ even thought they are way down their list of priorities Indeed, and it worked so well with prisoner numbers, just fling open the gates and let'em loose. Surprising nobody thought of it before. It had to be done, that is why labour were voted in by the electorate, to make sensible but tough decisions, Labour weren't voted in.....the Tories were voted out!!" Who cares, 411 seats to 121 . A thrashing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats That is labour voters thinking, however, they do not make up the majority of the people that are resident in the UK, I have also filtered on labour voters and they have it as issue number 3 too. You will also notice I said that immigration and asylum worries have risen since the start of the labour government, this indicates a lack of trust across the country in labour’s management of this. To be a successful government labour need to govern for the country, which it is what Starmer has promised, country first. No they don’t, it’s number 7, labour won 411 seats, a huge majority, the tories who tried to dehumanise asylum seekers and over played its importance got a pathetic 121 seats and Reform got a laughable 5 seats, the electorate have spoken It is certainly third in labour voters list of issues according to you gov, I will lean into that for the figures. The number of seats won do not represent the number of people who voted, which unless there is a comfortable rock to be under I think everyone knows labours vote share was the lowest in history. The above is detracting from the topic, other than trust in labour, do you have any thoughts that would contribute to less crossings going forward? No it isn’t, anyway, here are some facts, the tories and reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a pathetic 126 seats, the electorate have spoken What has that got to do with Starmer giving away 75 million to help smash the gangs? The majority of the electorate don’t think it’s a priority and they have voted labour in to deal with this small scale problem, that is all the matters right now Labour won because the Tories were shite. Stop kidding yourself and others that Labour's are any good. Who cares, they still won, the tories only won in 2019 because labour were shite ? Who cares obviously you. I don’t care, labour are the best party to lead the country decided by the electorate, nothing else matters Well if electoral decisions are the best thing, Brexit must have been an unqualified success, no? The one voted in 2016, 8 years ago, the one that was a referendum and not a general election? No, it’s been a disaster, false equivalence Now I'm confused whether the electorate can make best decisions. Which is it? Do you know the difference between a referendum and a general election, the way they work, the issues that people vote on? Anyway, the only important general election is the last one, the electorate have spoken Well yes, I get the difference, but it's the same electorate. So how can they be wrong on one occasion and right on another, it doesn't make sense. People change their mind, get back to me in 5 years I think they already have judging from Starmer's polling LOL
Who cares about opinion polls 5 years before an election, they are irrelevant LOL, do you take any notice off the current Brexit polls
Polls serve a purpose, that's why they exist. SKS has suffered the biggest drop in approval ratings post election of any PM. It'll only get worse - for him, the Labour Party, and sadly the nation."5 years before a GE , they are irrelevant, just like Boris and the tories being popular in 2019 is irrelevant in 2024 , get back to me in 5 years | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats This is the source for your claim: https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49594-general-election-2024-what-are-the-most-important-issues-for-voters In this list, education, crime, transport, welfare benefits, family and childcare all rank below immigration. Does that mean labour should stop giving a fuck about these?" That isn’t the yougov poll that I showed you relating to the priorities of labour voters. But it’s irrelevant, I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats This is the source for your claim: https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49594-general-election-2024-what-are-the-most-important-issues-for-voters In this list, education, crime, transport, welfare benefits, family and childcare all rank below immigration. Does that mean labour should stop giving a fuck about these? That isn’t the yougov poll that I showed you relating to the priorities of labour voters. But it’s irrelevant, I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate " Even for the labour voters specific stats, these issues ranked below immigration. You are trying to move goalposts again. You say that immigration isn't an important issue. Yet Labour just spent 75m on it. Why does Labour waste money on an issue that according to you isn't that important? If it is not even important, do you want Labour to spend even less on all the issues that ranked lower? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats This is the source for your claim: https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49594-general-election-2024-what-are-the-most-important-issues-for-voters In this list, education, crime, transport, welfare benefits, family and childcare all rank below immigration. Does that mean labour should stop giving a fuck about these? That isn’t the yougov poll that I showed you relating to the priorities of labour voters. But it’s irrelevant, I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate Even for the labour voters specific stats, these issues ranked below immigration. You are trying to move goalposts again. You say that immigration isn't an important issue. Yet Labour just spent 75m on it. Why does Labour waste money on an issue that according to you isn't that important? If it is not even important, do you want Labour to spend even less on all the issues that ranked lower?" Irrelevant, reform and the tories were rejected by the electorate, move on and accept you lost | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats This is the source for your claim: https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49594-general-election-2024-what-are-the-most-important-issues-for-voters In this list, education, crime, transport, welfare benefits, family and childcare all rank below immigration. Does that mean labour should stop giving a fuck about these? That isn’t the yougov poll that I showed you relating to the priorities of labour voters. But it’s irrelevant, I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate Even for the labour voters specific stats, these issues ranked below immigration. You are trying to move goalposts again. You say that immigration isn't an important issue. Yet Labour just spent 75m on it. Why does Labour waste money on an issue that according to you isn't that important? If it is not even important, do you want Labour to spend even less on all the issues that ranked lower? Irrelevant, reform and the tories were rejected by the electorate, move on and accept you lost " Great argument | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats This is the source for your claim: https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49594-general-election-2024-what-are-the-most-important-issues-for-voters In this list, education, crime, transport, welfare benefits, family and childcare all rank below immigration. Does that mean labour should stop giving a fuck about these? That isn’t the yougov poll that I showed you relating to the priorities of labour voters. But it’s irrelevant, I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate Even for the labour voters specific stats, these issues ranked below immigration. You are trying to move goalposts again. You say that immigration isn't an important issue. Yet Labour just spent 75m on it. Why does Labour waste money on an issue that according to you isn't that important? If it is not even important, do you want Labour to spend even less on all the issues that ranked lower? Irrelevant, reform and the tories were rejected by the electorate, move on and accept you lost Great argument "Sorry, but I used to hear this a lot, you lost, get over it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats This is the source for your claim: https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49594-general-election-2024-what-are-the-most-important-issues-for-voters In this list, education, crime, transport, welfare benefits, family and childcare all rank below immigration. Does that mean labour should stop giving a fuck about these? That isn’t the yougov poll that I showed you relating to the priorities of labour voters. But it’s irrelevant, I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate Even for the labour voters specific stats, these issues ranked below immigration. You are trying to move goalposts again. You say that immigration isn't an important issue. Yet Labour just spent 75m on it. Why does Labour waste money on an issue that according to you isn't that important? If it is not even important, do you want Labour to spend even less on all the issues that ranked lower? Irrelevant, reform and the tories were rejected by the electorate, move on and accept you lost Great argument
Sorry, but I used to hear this a lot, you lost, get over it "************************************ How old are you, son...?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell Top 3 most important issues people are concerned about in the UK are Economy immigration and asylum Health. The worry over economy and management of, has increased since labour took office, along with immigration and asylum. You might like the slogan and have a lot of faith in labour, but you would appear not to be representative of the mood of the people. Going back to your point about tories and their Rwanda scheme, it could be said that labours smash the gangs, is the same type of useless soundbite albeit less controversial. I think we can all see throwing money towards other countries to manage the problem on our behalf is simply giving our tax £’s away. I’m not sure having faith in labour is enough, or correct. It was number 7 with labour voters, and labour have just won a huge majority , reform who prioritised asylum and immigration got a laughable 5 seats This is the source for your claim: https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49594-general-election-2024-what-are-the-most-important-issues-for-voters In this list, education, crime, transport, welfare benefits, family and childcare all rank below immigration. Does that mean labour should stop giving a fuck about these? That isn’t the yougov poll that I showed you relating to the priorities of labour voters. But it’s irrelevant, I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate Even for the labour voters specific stats, these issues ranked below immigration. You are trying to move goalposts again. You say that immigration isn't an important issue. Yet Labour just spent 75m on it. Why does Labour waste money on an issue that according to you isn't that important? If it is not even important, do you want Labour to spend even less on all the issues that ranked lower? Irrelevant, reform and the tories were rejected by the electorate, move on and accept you lost Great argument
Sorry, but I used to hear this a lot, you lost, get over it
************************************
How old are you, son...??"40, old enough to remember far older people than myself constantly using that statement ,  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just out of curiousity what percentage of the population actually votes? " Last time was low, under 60% | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So its not really a true representation of the publics views then tbh just the public that can be bothered voting's views? " Do you think people should be forced to vote? It’s not labours fault who voted and who didn’t | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So its not really a true representation of the publics views then tbh just the public that can be bothered voting's views? Do you think people should be forced to vote? It’s not labours fault who voted and who didn’t " note sure tbh possibly not a bad idea but shows that 40% ish cant be arsed or think its pointless because they're all full of shit 😂 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So its not really a true representation of the publics views then tbh just the public that can be bothered voting's views? Do you think people should be forced to vote? It’s not labours fault who voted and who didn’t note sure tbh possibly not a bad idea but shows that 40% ish cant be arsed or think its pointless because they're all full of shit 😂" Probably, who cares what people who dont care think? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So its not really a true representation of the publics views then tbh just the public that can be bothered voting's views? Do you think people should be forced to vote? It’s not labours fault who voted and who didn’t note sure tbh possibly not a bad idea but shows that 40% ish cant be arsed or think its pointless because they're all full of shit 😂 Probably, who cares what people who dont care think? " its not exactly a triumphant win when only about half the population vote but still a win however the voting system works, would be intresting to see what would happen if everybody were made to vote | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So its not really a true representation of the publics views then tbh just the public that can be bothered voting's views? Do you think people should be forced to vote? It’s not labours fault who voted and who didn’t note sure tbh possibly not a bad idea but shows that 40% ish cant be arsed or think its pointless because they're all full of shit 😂 Probably, who cares what people who dont care think? its not exactly a triumphant win when only about half the population vote but still a win however the voting system works, would be intresting to see what would happen if everybody were made to vote " I wouldn’t be against making people vote, there is zero evidence to suggest it would have altered the result of the last election | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So its not really a true representation of the publics views then tbh just the public that can be bothered voting's views? Do you think people should be forced to vote? It’s not labours fault who voted and who didn’t note sure tbh possibly not a bad idea but shows that 40% ish cant be arsed or think its pointless because they're all full of shit 😂 Probably, who cares what people who dont care think? its not exactly a triumphant win when only about half the population vote but still a win however the voting system works, would be intresting to see what would happen if everybody were made to vote I wouldn’t be against making people vote, there is zero evidence to suggest it would have altered the result of the last election " no sure wonder what class/catergory of people are least likely to vote? Politics seem to be more popular within middle and upper class? But im only guessing been i dont know anyone intrested in politics 😂 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is to announce an extra £75m to tackle people-smuggling gangs. That’s on top of Sunak’s £500 million to France over three years. £800 million written off on the illegal Rwanda scheme 1000 extra home office case workers, to replace the 1000 working on the Rwanda scheme 5000 vacant paid for buffer hotel rooms at £600k a day and £2.75bn accommodating the migrants that are here 215,900 on the home office asylum list, 63,000 of which were granted right to stay a few weeks ago Add the lawyers, courts, interpreters, and £90m profits announced by Clearsprings for accommodation. This is a good business to be in. " But is this topic and all those figures just a distraction, like was often claimed. Is it another, look over there at those brown people in a dingy? Labour were very vocal about this issue pre election saying they will smash the gangs but as yet not heard how they will do this and according to the BBC the gangs operate from abroad so cannot face UK justice. I think in 5 years it will be a key issue they are judged on | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell They'll lower the bar for granting asylum (just show up) then Hey Presto illegal crossing numbers plummet. Job done. Good solution, that is why they won a huge majority at the last election, to tackle these ‘problems’ even thought they are way down their list of priorities Indeed, and it worked so well with prisoner numbers, just fling open the gates and let'em loose. Surprising nobody thought of it before. It had to be done, that is why labour were voted in by the electorate, to make sensible but tough decisions, Labour weren't voted in.....the Tories were voted out!!" How do you vote a party out? I could only put an X in the box I was voting for. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell They'll lower the bar for granting asylum (just show up) then Hey Presto illegal crossing numbers plummet. Job done. Good solution, that is why they won a huge majority at the last election, to tackle these ‘problems’ even thought they are way down their list of priorities Indeed, and it worked so well with prisoner numbers, just fling open the gates and let'em loose. Surprising nobody thought of it before. It had to be done, that is why labour were voted in by the electorate, to make sensible but tough decisions, Labour weren't voted in.....the Tories were voted out!! How do you vote a party out? I could only put an X in the box I was voting for." When the electorate is motivated more to remove the current government than by a strong preference for the opposition, they either vote for others or do not register a vote. IE. you use your vote for anything other than voting for that party. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Throwing 75 million at a problem nobody can fix without changing laws and removing the country from the UN refugee charter is shortsighted, and can only serve one purpose, to look like something is being done… Addressing the cause is the only sensible way forward, ignoring it will continue to cost us billions we simply haven’t got. The tories wasted 100 millions on the Rwanda scheme, smash the gangs and stop the boats, it’s what the electorate voted for You are in agreement then Labour will sort this problem, all though it isn’t a priority , the election proved this How do you think labour will sort it out, when so many have and are failing around the world? By ‘smashing the gangs’ this country loves a good slogan, I have every faith in labour and so do the electorate , all thought they have far bigger problem to sort aswell They'll lower the bar for granting asylum (just show up) then Hey Presto illegal crossing numbers plummet. Job done. Good solution, that is why they won a huge majority at the last election, to tackle these ‘problems’ even thought they are way down their list of priorities Indeed, and it worked so well with prisoner numbers, just fling open the gates and let'em loose. Surprising nobody thought of it before. It had to be done, that is why labour were voted in by the electorate, to make sensible but tough decisions, Labour weren't voted in.....the Tories were voted out!! How do you vote a party out? I could only put an X in the box I was voting for. When the electorate is motivated more to remove the current government than by a strong preference for the opposition, they either vote for others or do not register a vote. IE. you use your vote for anything other than voting for that party." Tactical voting lost labour votes many going to the Lib Dems. You can thank Ms Vorderman for that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you suggest as an alternative means of reducing illegal arrival of boats? " Stop them getting off the beaches and push back those that do! Make all the illegal immigrants on french coast that this will happen so if try its their responsibilty - more will drown but they will have been warned and more importantly none will get to uk # | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you suggest as an alternative means of reducing illegal arrival of boats? Stop them getting off the beaches and push back those that do! Make all the illegal immigrants on french coast that this will happen so if try its their responsibilty - more will drown but they will have been warned and more importantly none will get to uk #" Illegal, try again | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you suggest as an alternative means of reducing illegal arrival of boats? Stop them getting off the beaches and push back those that do! Make all the illegal immigrants on french coast that this will happen so if try its their responsibilty - more will drown but they will have been warned and more importantly none will get to uk # Illegal, try again " remove the incentives that they travel through countless safe countries to get here for. and deport all that are found to have criminal records or links to terroism groups ect | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you suggest as an alternative means of reducing illegal arrival of boats? Stop them getting off the beaches and push back those that do! Make all the illegal immigrants on french coast that this will happen so if try its their responsibilty - more will drown but they will have been warned and more importantly none will get to uk # Illegal, try again remove the incentives that they travel through countless safe countries to get here for. and deport all that are found to have criminal records or links to terroism groups ect " I presume that’s why Starmer is at an interpol conference to co ordinate actions across Europe. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you suggest as an alternative means of reducing illegal arrival of boats? Stop them getting off the beaches and push back those that do! Make all the illegal immigrants on french coast that this will happen so if try its their responsibilty - more will drown but they will have been warned and more importantly none will get to uk # Illegal, try again remove the incentives that they travel through countless safe countries to get here for. and deport all that are found to have criminal records or links to terroism groups ect I presume that’s why Starmer is at an interpol conference to co ordinate actions across Europe." presumptions arent allowed on fab forums 😂be wearing a tin foil hat next with them wild theories | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you suggest as an alternative means of reducing illegal arrival of boats? Stop them getting off the beaches and push back those that do! Make all the illegal immigrants on french coast that this will happen so if try its their responsibilty - more will drown but they will have been warned and more importantly none will get to uk # Illegal, try again remove the incentives that they travel through countless safe countries to get here for. and deport all that are found to have criminal records or links to terroism groups ect I presume that’s why Starmer is at an interpol conference to co ordinate actions across Europe.presumptions arent allowed on fab forums 😂be wearing a tin foil hat next with them wild theories " Sorry I’ll go and stand on the naughty step. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What do you suggest as an alternative means of reducing illegal arrival of boats? Stop them getting off the beaches and push back those that do! Make all the illegal immigrants on french coast that this will happen so if try its their responsibilty - more will drown but they will have been warned and more importantly none will get to uk # Illegal, try again remove the incentives that they travel through countless safe countries to get here for. and deport all that are found to have criminal records or links to terroism groups ect I presume that’s why Starmer is at an interpol conference to co ordinate actions across Europe.presumptions arent allowed on fab forums 😂be wearing a tin foil hat next with them wild theories Sorry I’ll go and stand on the naughty step." its fine u can sit rather than stand | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate " Reform and the Tories got 10,946,535 votes between them, which is 1,237,819 more than Labour got. It would seem that the "small issue" was quite popular. I'm sure you'll point out that Labour won more seats than the Tories and Reform added together, which is true, but your claim was that those parties' "number one priority" got rejected by the electorate, which clearly isn't true. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate Reform and the Tories got 10,946,535 votes between them, which is 1,237,819 more than Labour got. It would seem that the "small issue" was quite popular. I'm sure you'll point out that Labour won more seats than the Tories and Reform added together, which is true, but your claim was that those parties' "number one priority" got rejected by the electorate, which clearly isn't true." so out of 70 million people labour got around 9.5 million 😂😂ffs i wouldnt say they smashed it then 🤦they could be nearly half of them didnt have their readers on and marked the wrong box | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate" "Reform and the Tories got 10,946,535 votes between them, which is 1,237,819 more than Labour got. It would seem that the "small issue" was quite popular. I'm sure you'll point out that Labour won more seats than the Tories and Reform added together, which is true, but your claim was that those parties' "number one priority" got rejected by the electorate, which clearly isn't true." "so out of 70 million people labour got around 9.5 million ffs i wouldnt say they smashed it then they could be nearly half of them didnt have their readers on and marked the wrong box " Well, only 48m are registered to vote, so that brings the percentages up a bit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate Reform and the Tories got 10,946,535 votes between them, which is 1,237,819 more than Labour got. It would seem that the "small issue" was quite popular. I'm sure you'll point out that Labour won more seats than the Tories and Reform added together, which is true, but your claim was that those parties' "number one priority" got rejected by the electorate, which clearly isn't true. so out of 70 million people labour got around 9.5 million ffs i wouldnt say they smashed it then they could be nearly half of them didnt have their readers on and marked the wrong box Well, only 48m are registered to vote, so that brings the percentages up a bit." fair point👍 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate Reform and the Tories got 10,946,535 votes between them, which is 1,237,819 more than Labour got. It would seem that the "small issue" was quite popular. I'm sure you'll point out that Labour won more seats than the Tories and Reform added together, which is true, but your claim was that those parties' "number one priority" got rejected by the electorate, which clearly isn't true." They got 126 seats compared to 411 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I didn’t say they don’t give a fuck about asylum and immigration but as they election has proven, parties who made this small issue there number one priority got rejected by the electorate Reform and the Tories got 10,946,535 votes between them, which is 1,237,819 more than Labour got. It would seem that the "small issue" was quite popular. I'm sure you'll point out that Labour won more seats than the Tories and Reform added together, which is true, but your claim was that those parties' "number one priority" got rejected by the electorate, which clearly isn't true." Why don’t you add labour votes with Lib Dem , SNP and the greens? All parties who don’t prioritise asylum seekers | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"75million seems a lot of money to spend with no results. " The money hasn't been spent yet, and you're already expecting results? " Why doesn't Starmer send the bill to Bullshitistan from whence they came from instead of charging the British people. " Maybe because this isn't a real country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These gangs operate from outside UK's jurisdiction. I would be surprised if we already didn't know who these gangs are. We just couldn't do anything about it. Just an eyewash to pretend like they are dealing with the problem without fixing the underlying root cause." The underlying root causes are wars, persecution, desolation in a host of other countries. How do you suggest our government fix all of those? They can’t | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"75million seems a lot of money to spend with no results. Why doesn't Starmer send the bill to Bullshitistan from whence they came from instead of charging the British people. " That sounds like a Trump idea, build a wall and send the bill to the other lot. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
