Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Part way through Rogan’s interview with JD Vance. Typically for Rogan it’s a long one at three hours. But Vance is pretty eloquent and relatable. Very down to earth. I suspect this is where Trump and Vance have a big advantage over Harris/Walz. " Yes I heard he came across well. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Four days left until the USA votes for its next President - will it be Harris or Trump ? Share your thoughts and predictions here. " Trump to win, the bookies are rarely wrong | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile. Instead they put up an already unpopular person, whose sole poll bump was from being "not senile", whose core argument is "I'm not Trump". So now it's a race. The Democratic Party and left wing media do all the heavy lifting for Trump. If they just ignored him entirely, gave no oxygen to his shenanigans and focused on the positives of Kamala's campaign (can anyone even name any?), then it would be a much easier fight for them." How come this tactic works for Trump and the right wing media, just constantly slagging off Kamala and Biden? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile." I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile. I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC." Whomever the candidate would have been, the media would have gone for them. Just look at the attacks Harris received for the tone of her laugh. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start. Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”. " Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman". Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile. Instead they put up an already unpopular person, whose sole poll bump was from being "not senile", whose core argument is "I'm not Trump". So now it's a race. The Democratic Party and left wing media do all the heavy lifting for Trump. If they just ignored him entirely, gave no oxygen to his shenanigans and focused on the positives of Kamala's campaign (can anyone even name any?), then it would be a much easier fight for them." "How come this tactic works for Trump and the right wing media, just constantly slagging off Kamala and Biden?" Because Trump is playing by different rules. He can say something one day, and the exact opposite the day after, and no one will bat an eyelid. No one expects him to be consistent, or to make sense. On the other side, Kamala is still trying to fight like a politician, focusing on policies and moral character. If she just completely ignored Trump, smiled a lot, and kept asserting that America will be better when she's in charge, she'd be a lot higher in the polls. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile. I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC." Obama won two elections easily as a black candidate. I'm sure a strong female candidate could also be successful. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile. Instead they put up an already unpopular person, whose sole poll bump was from being "not senile", whose core argument is "I'm not Trump". So now it's a race. The Democratic Party and left wing media do all the heavy lifting for Trump. If they just ignored him entirely, gave no oxygen to his shenanigans and focused on the positives of Kamala's campaign (can anyone even name any?), then it would be a much easier fight for them." Excellent analysis! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile. Instead they put up an already unpopular person, whose sole poll bump was from being "not senile", whose core argument is "I'm not Trump". So now it's a race. The Democratic Party and left wing media do all the heavy lifting for Trump. If they just ignored him entirely, gave no oxygen to his shenanigans and focused on the positives of Kamala's campaign (can anyone even name any?), then it would be a much easier fight for them. How come this tactic works for Trump and the right wing media, just constantly slagging off Kamala and Biden? Because Trump is playing by different rules. He can say something one day, and the exact opposite the day after, and no one will bat an eyelid. No one expects him to be consistent, or to make sense. On the other side, Kamala is still trying to fight like a politician, focusing on policies and moral character. If she just completely ignored Trump, smiled a lot, and kept asserting that America will be better when she's in charge, she'd be a lot higher in the polls." Thank you. Interesting. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All the democrats needed to do was put up any articulate, charismatic, 40-65 year old person, with a clean record and a nice smile. I think this is almost right but suspect we should add not female and not a POC. Whomever the candidate would have been, the media would have gone for them. Just look at the attacks Harris received for the tone of her laugh. " If the media had been more honest about Biden's mental decline the Dems would be in a much stronger position with a better candidate. Harris is often an embarrassment in her public appearances - she was booed at her own rally this week! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start. Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”. Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman". Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions! " Two verifications Over a year old Both “by webcam” | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start. Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”. Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman". Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions! Two verifications Over a year old Both “by webcam”" Stalked me on one of your many other profiles that I haven't blocked yet? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start. Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”. Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman". Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions! Two verifications Over a year old Both “by webcam” Stalked me on one of your many other profiles that I haven't blocked yet? " I have no interest in you at all and have no idea what you are talking about. I’d prefer if you stick to the topic and avoid personal commentary. Otherwise please avoid interacting with me at all in the forums. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Democrats have messed up their response to Trump right from the start. Instead of the Russia Collusion hoax, falsely framing him as a fascist, trying to put him in jail, and generally losing their minds because they lost in 2016, all of which has backfired on them massively, all they really needed to do was say “yeah Donald, he’s an American icon, great businessman and media star, we all love him, but you know what we just disagree on policy and here’s why”. Some amazing comedy in here "great businessman". Your posts are missed during your regular profile transitions! Two verifications Over a year old Both “by webcam” Stalked me on one of your many other profiles that I haven't blocked yet? I have no interest in you at all and have no idea what you are talking about." Then why are you stalking my profile with one of your other accounts? " I’d prefer if you stick to the topic and avoid personal commentary. " Then why are you poking around my profile and making comments about it on here? " Otherwise please avoid interacting with me at all in the forums. " Why, it's a forum, we can all reply to whomever we want, and ignore whomever we want. Does it upset you when it's pointed out that come back every six weeks with a new account? If so, I'll stop. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |