Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Let’s face it … labours greatest moments is a pretty low bar …"  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Interviewed today by Laura Kuenssberg, Bridget Phillipson said the manifesto pledge referred to people "whose main source of income is the income they earn from going out to work". Asked repeatedly about businesses she can’t answer We assume the 4.2 million self employed “business owners” are not working people " Phillipson is, like so many modern politicians, way out of her depth. Having been a business owner, I can't think of a single current cabinet minister I'd have employed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All tax rises pass through to additional consumer costs at the end of the day. So it's hard to see how tax increases at this level will do anything other than stifle the economy - the very opposite of what Labour promised." I suspect the markets will be ok ish as she is not giving money away like under truss. The problem, as you mention is increased costs for business has a habit of filtering through to the consumer. So instead of seeing the hit in the wage package, workers will see it when buying stuff. Also as others,say, where do self employed people stand on this who are often the hardest workers about. Still Labour said they will be for business so no need to panic  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Let’s face it … labours greatest moments is a pretty low bar …" Did you forget that they have just won a huge majority at the last election? 411 seats, thrashing the opposition  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Let’s face it … labours greatest moments is a pretty low bar … Did you forget that they have just won a huge majority at the last election? 411 seats, thrashing the opposition "Achieved with fewer members of the tax paying public voting for them than voted for Jeremy Corbyn. That is quite an achievement for sure. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Let’s face it … labours greatest moments is a pretty low bar … Did you forget that they have just won a huge majority at the last election? 411 seats, thrashing the opposition
Achieved with fewer members of the tax paying public voting for them than voted for Jeremy Corbyn. That is quite an achievement for sure."They got 411 seats, that is indisputable, they will be in government for 5 years, they inherited a shit show | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer will issue a warning later today that the budget will ‘ignore populist chorus of easy answers’" Good, populist policies have got us in this mess | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A row has broken out between the UK's financial watchdog and former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt over a review into the so-called £22bn "black hole" in the public finances Labour claims it has inherited. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to raise several taxes in her Budget on Wednesday to cover the claimed shortfall. But Hunt says a report to be released on the same day by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which is independent of the government, will criticise his party and help make the case for Labour's tax rises. The OBR will publish its assessment of the chancellor's economic policies and also release forecasts of their impact on the UK economy over the next five years. But it is also preparing to release an additional report, commissioned earlier this year, on the "adequacy of information" supplied to it by the previous Tory government. ++++++ Sounds like Hunt is worried! Got something to hide? " Can’t hide the £1.7 trillion pounds of national debt his party amassed over 14 years, with which the £400 odd billion Labour added, is costing us £300 million a day in interest | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A row has broken out between the UK's financial watchdog and former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt over a review into the so-called £22bn "black hole" in the public finances Labour claims it has inherited. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to raise several taxes in her Budget on Wednesday to cover the claimed shortfall. But Hunt says a report to be released on the same day by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which is independent of the government, will criticise his party and help make the case for Labour's tax rises. The OBR will publish its assessment of the chancellor's economic policies and also release forecasts of their impact on the UK economy over the next five years. But it is also preparing to release an additional report, commissioned earlier this year, on the "adequacy of information" supplied to it by the previous Tory government. ++++++ Sounds like Hunt is worried! Got something to hide? Can’t hide the £1.7 trillion pounds of national debt his party amassed over 14 years, with which the £400 odd billion Labour added, is costing us £300 million a day in interest " And those years of historically low interest rates. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A row has broken out between the UK's financial watchdog and former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt over a review into the so-called £22bn "black hole" in the public finances Labour claims it has inherited. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to raise several taxes in her Budget on Wednesday to cover the claimed shortfall. But Hunt says a report to be released on the same day by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which is independent of the government, will criticise his party and help make the case for Labour's tax rises. The OBR will publish its assessment of the chancellor's economic policies and also release forecasts of their impact on the UK economy over the next five years. But it is also preparing to release an additional report, commissioned earlier this year, on the "adequacy of information" supplied to it by the previous Tory government. ++++++ Sounds like Hunt is worried! Got something to hide? " You also had Mervyn King coming out criticising Hunt for the last two 2% employee NI cuts. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A row has broken out between the UK's financial watchdog and former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt over a review into the so-called £22bn "black hole" in the public finances Labour claims it has inherited. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to raise several taxes in her Budget on Wednesday to cover the claimed shortfall. But Hunt says a report to be released on the same day by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which is independent of the government, will criticise his party and help make the case for Labour's tax rises. The OBR will publish its assessment of the chancellor's economic policies and also release forecasts of their impact on the UK economy over the next five years. But it is also preparing to release an additional report, commissioned earlier this year, on the "adequacy of information" supplied to it by the previous Tory government. ++++++ Sounds like Hunt is worried! Got something to hide? You also had Mervyn King coming out criticising Hunt for the last two 2% employee NI cuts." At the risk of being accused of defending Labour (I’m not and if I were I am a big boy and would stand my ground) it will be interesting to see what comes out because plenty of people, inc many on here, have been claiming the black hole is fictitious. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" claiming the black hole is fictitious. " £22,000,000,000. Black hole cannot be in dispute when £1,700,000,000,000 increase in national debt costing £9bn annually (£300m a day) in interest. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A row has broken out between the UK's financial watchdog and former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt over a review into the so-called £22bn "black hole" in the public finances Labour claims it has inherited. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to raise several taxes in her Budget on Wednesday to cover the claimed shortfall. But Hunt says a report to be released on the same day by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which is independent of the government, will criticise his party and help make the case for Labour's tax rises. The OBR will publish its assessment of the chancellor's economic policies and also release forecasts of their impact on the UK economy over the next five years. But it is also preparing to release an additional report, commissioned earlier this year, on the "adequacy of information" supplied to it by the previous Tory government. ++++++ Sounds like Hunt is worried! Got something to hide? You also had Mervyn King coming out criticising Hunt for the last two 2% employee NI cuts. At the risk of being accused of defending Labour (I’m not and if I were I am a big boy and would stand my ground) it will be interesting to see what comes out because plenty of people, inc many on here, have been claiming the black hole is fictitious. " I have not read any comments that say it is fictitious? I have said on here that they have refused FOI to show the debt and how it is made up, as have others. I have also called out that the mantra of a 22 billion blackhole was a surprise is a bit of a stretch when they were told about the finances.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A row has broken out between the UK's financial watchdog and former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt over a review into the so-called £22bn "black hole" in the public finances Labour claims it has inherited. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to raise several taxes in her Budget on Wednesday to cover the claimed shortfall. But Hunt says a report to be released on the same day by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which is independent of the government, will criticise his party and help make the case for Labour's tax rises. The OBR will publish its assessment of the chancellor's economic policies and also release forecasts of their impact on the UK economy over the next five years. But it is also preparing to release an additional report, commissioned earlier this year, on the "adequacy of information" supplied to it by the previous Tory government. ++++++ Sounds like Hunt is worried! Got something to hide? You also had Mervyn King coming out criticising Hunt for the last two 2% employee NI cuts. At the risk of being accused of defending Labour (I’m not and if I were I am a big boy and would stand my ground) it will be interesting to see what comes out because plenty of people, inc many on here, have been claiming the black hole is fictitious. I have not read any comments that say it is fictitious? I have said on here that they have refused FOI to show the debt and how it is made up, as have others. I have also called out that the mantra of a 22 billion blackhole was a surprise is a bit of a stretch when they were told about the finances...." Some on here think the £22bn black hole is made up and not true. Some have implied it while carefully wording posts to give themselves wriggle room and avoid embarrassment. I’m just curious what will be revealed and why Hunt seems so nervous? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A row has broken out between the UK's financial watchdog and former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt over a review into the so-called £22bn "black hole" in the public finances Labour claims it has inherited. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to raise several taxes in her Budget on Wednesday to cover the claimed shortfall. But Hunt says a report to be released on the same day by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which is independent of the government, will criticise his party and help make the case for Labour's tax rises. The OBR will publish its assessment of the chancellor's economic policies and also release forecasts of their impact on the UK economy over the next five years. But it is also preparing to release an additional report, commissioned earlier this year, on the "adequacy of information" supplied to it by the previous Tory government. ++++++ Sounds like Hunt is worried! Got something to hide? You also had Mervyn King coming out criticising Hunt for the last two 2% employee NI cuts. At the risk of being accused of defending Labour (I’m not and if I were I am a big boy and would stand my ground) it will be interesting to see what comes out because plenty of people, inc many on here, have been claiming the black hole is fictitious. I have not read any comments that say it is fictitious? I have said on here that they have refused FOI to show the debt and how it is made up, as have others. I have also called out that the mantra of a 22 billion blackhole was a surprise is a bit of a stretch when they were told about the finances.... Some on here think the £22bn black hole is made up and not true. Some have implied it while carefully wording posts to give themselves wriggle room and avoid embarrassment. I’m just curious what will be revealed and why Hunt seems so nervous? " There is debt, it is a given but what it is made up of is my interest. The other issue I have is the debt that is the pipeline, and the new debt the government has now saddled us with. That is 3 debt fronts, they are only complaining about 1, my thoughts are don’t let this 1 item cloud the vision of the other 2 which will be far more substantial in total | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A row has broken out between the UK's financial watchdog and former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt over a review into the so-called £22bn "black hole" in the public finances Labour claims it has inherited. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to raise several taxes in her Budget on Wednesday to cover the claimed shortfall. But Hunt says a report to be released on the same day by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which is independent of the government, will criticise his party and help make the case for Labour's tax rises. The OBR will publish its assessment of the chancellor's economic policies and also release forecasts of their impact on the UK economy over the next five years. But it is also preparing to release an additional report, commissioned earlier this year, on the "adequacy of information" supplied to it by the previous Tory government. ++++++ Sounds like Hunt is worried! Got something to hide? You also had Mervyn King coming out criticising Hunt for the last two 2% employee NI cuts. At the risk of being accused of defending Labour (I’m not and if I were I am a big boy and would stand my ground) it will be interesting to see what comes out because plenty of people, inc many on here, have been claiming the black hole is fictitious. I have not read any comments that say it is fictitious? I have said on here that they have refused FOI to show the debt and how it is made up, as have others. I have also called out that the mantra of a 22 billion blackhole was a surprise is a bit of a stretch when they were told about the finances.... Some on here think the £22bn black hole is made up and not true. Some have implied it while carefully wording posts to give themselves wriggle room and avoid embarrassment. I’m just curious what will be revealed and why Hunt seems so nervous? There is debt, it is a given but what it is made up of is my interest. The other issue I have is the debt that is the pipeline, and the new debt the government has now saddled us with. That is 3 debt fronts, they are only complaining about 1, my thoughts are don’t let this 1 item cloud the vision of the other 2 which will be far more substantial in total" I’d say this is partially correct except that you also aren’t factoring long term debt vs in year debt. The £22bn black hole is for FY24/25. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Interviewed today by Laura Kuenssberg, Bridget Phillipson said the manifesto pledge referred to people "whose main source of income is the income they earn from going out to work". Asked repeatedly about businesses she can’t answer We assume the 4.2 million self employed “business owners” are not working people " Given how central the term “working people” was in their election promises, it’s quite staggering that they still won’t answer the question as to who exactly they mean. I suspect it means a fairly narrow band of workers. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A row has broken out between the UK's financial watchdog and former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt over a review into the so-called £22bn "black hole" in the public finances Labour claims it has inherited. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to raise several taxes in her Budget on Wednesday to cover the claimed shortfall. But Hunt says a report to be released on the same day by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which is independent of the government, will criticise his party and help make the case for Labour's tax rises. The OBR will publish its assessment of the chancellor's economic policies and also release forecasts of their impact on the UK economy over the next five years. But it is also preparing to release an additional report, commissioned earlier this year, on the "adequacy of information" supplied to it by the previous Tory government. ++++++ Sounds like Hunt is worried! Got something to hide? You also had Mervyn King coming out criticising Hunt for the last two 2% employee NI cuts. At the risk of being accused of defending Labour (I’m not and if I were I am a big boy and would stand my ground) it will be interesting to see what comes out because plenty of people, inc many on here, have been claiming the black hole is fictitious. I have not read any comments that say it is fictitious? I have said on here that they have refused FOI to show the debt and how it is made up, as have others. I have also called out that the mantra of a 22 billion blackhole was a surprise is a bit of a stretch when they were told about the finances.... Some on here think the £22bn black hole is made up and not true. Some have implied it while carefully wording posts to give themselves wriggle room and avoid embarrassment. I’m just curious what will be revealed and why Hunt seems so nervous? " The 22bn figure is made up. They have been asked many times to explain it and they can’t / won’t. Then again, they can’t explain what a “working person” is either | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The unions have probably hinted at more strikes. " Yes. London Underground for starters | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Starmer will issue a warning later today that the budget will ‘ignore populist chorus of easy answers’" It will also ignore easy questions … like “what do you mean by ‘working person’?” | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A row has broken out between the UK's financial watchdog and former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt over a review into the so-called £22bn "black hole" in the public finances Labour claims it has inherited. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is expected to raise several taxes in her Budget on Wednesday to cover the claimed shortfall. But Hunt says a report to be released on the same day by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which is independent of the government, will criticise his party and help make the case for Labour's tax rises. The OBR will publish its assessment of the chancellor's economic policies and also release forecasts of their impact on the UK economy over the next five years. But it is also preparing to release an additional report, commissioned earlier this year, on the "adequacy of information" supplied to it by the previous Tory government. ++++++ Sounds like Hunt is worried! Got something to hide? You also had Mervyn King coming out criticising Hunt for the last two 2% employee NI cuts. At the risk of being accused of defending Labour (I’m not and if I were I am a big boy and would stand my ground) it will be interesting to see what comes out because plenty of people, inc many on here, have been claiming the black hole is fictitious. I have not read any comments that say it is fictitious? I have said on here that they have refused FOI to show the debt and how it is made up, as have others. I have also called out that the mantra of a 22 billion blackhole was a surprise is a bit of a stretch when they were told about the finances.... Some on here think the £22bn black hole is made up and not true. Some have implied it while carefully wording posts to give themselves wriggle room and avoid embarrassment. I’m just curious what will be revealed and why Hunt seems so nervous? The 22bn figure is made up. They have been asked many times to explain it and they can’t / won’t. Then again, they can’t explain what a “working person” is either " Let’s see what the OBR say in their report | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Interviewed today by Laura Kuenssberg, Bridget Phillipson said the manifesto pledge referred to people "whose main source of income is the income they earn from going out to work". Asked repeatedly about businesses she can’t answer We assume the 4.2 million self employed “business owners” are not working people Given how central the term “working people” was in their election promises, it’s quite staggering that they still won’t answer the question as to who exactly they mean. I suspect it means a fairly narrow band of workers. " I heard “working people” meant just John in Macclesfield  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Interviewed today by Laura Kuenssberg, Bridget Phillipson said the manifesto pledge referred to people "whose main source of income is the income they earn from going out to work". Asked repeatedly about businesses she can’t answer We assume the 4.2 million self employed “business owners” are not working people Given how central the term “working people” was in their election promises, it’s quite staggering that they still won’t answer the question as to who exactly they mean. I suspect it means a fairly narrow band of workers. I heard “working people” meant just John in Macclesfield "I’ve spoken to John and he’s just been signed off on the sick | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Interviewed today by Laura Kuenssberg, Bridget Phillipson said the manifesto pledge referred to people "whose main source of income is the income they earn from going out to work". Asked repeatedly about businesses she can’t answer We assume the 4.2 million self employed “business owners” are not working people " (Insert very angry emoji here) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
