Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wes Streeting the health secretary says new weight-loss jabs could be given to unemployed people to help them get back into work. The comments were made at the International Investment Summit. “Illness caused by obesity causes people to take an extra four sick days a year on average, while many others are forced out of work altogether” he said. Will this be voluntary or compulsory for shirkers and should it be included in the new employment rights bill ? " Give the lazy git 3 month to find a job or no benefits. Bet that would shift the weight off the fat gits. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. " Sounds familiar but on a far smaller scale  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Should we really be medicating the population to keep them fit and able to work? I'm in a South European country at the moment and it's striking how few obese people there are, especially amongst the young. What is it causing Brits to pile on the pounds? By the way there are plenty of cake shops and fast food outlets here too!" Nutritionists often cite the Mediterranean diet as being very advantages. Access to lots of fresh fruit, vegetables, fish. Comparatively low levels of alcohol consumption (compared to Brits - certainly in terms of binge drinking). If you have Netflix watch documentary on Blue Zones. Really interesting (focused more on areas with people living to very old age). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. " In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS." I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What happens if people refuse these jabs? Do they have benefits stopped? If so that sounds a lot like forcing people to take medication they don't want to,and if someone does take it and gets some sort of side effect where do they stand legally " There may be some precedent with the Covid Vaccines. Certainly the pharmaceutical companies were indemnified by Govt in that instance so they may be protected. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What happens if people refuse these jabs? Do they have benefits stopped? If so that sounds a lot like forcing people to take medication they don't want to,and if someone does take it and gets some sort of side effect where do they stand legally " Also, what happens if (as they will) trial participants get side effects? Then the taxpayer has to fund years of litigation and multi-£ mil. payouts. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why not just give them laxatives ? " And then send them into work? Could be a bit unpleasant  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why not just give them laxatives ? And then send them into work? Could be a bit unpleasant "Don't they say you should poop on the boss's time ?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. " They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs x" We'll have less of this sensible talk in here young lady | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs x" how would they enforce it, easy if your not working because of obesity take this jab that will help you lose weight otherwise we will sanction you because you are not doing anything to help yourself | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wes Streeting the health secretary says new weight-loss jabs could be given to unemployed people to help them get back into work. The comments were made at the International Investment Summit. “Illness caused by obesity causes people to take an extra four sick days a year on average, while many others are forced out of work altogether” he said. Will this be voluntary or compulsory for shirkers and should it be included in the new employment rights bill ? " wasn’t long ago when the government where warning of the dangers of these jabs lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs xhow would they enforce it, easy if your not working because of obesity take this jab that will help you lose weight otherwise we will sanction you because you are not doing anything to help yourself" So same with smoking then? If you smoke on benefits you'll be sanctioned then? Mrs x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Wes Streeting the health secretary says new weight-loss jabs could be given to unemployed people to help them get back into work. The comments were made at the International Investment Summit. “Illness caused by obesity causes people to take an extra four sick days a year on average, while many others are forced out of work altogether” he said. Will this be voluntary or compulsory for shirkers and should it be included in the new employment rights bill ? Give the lazy git 3 month to find a job or no benefits. Bet that would shift the weight off the fat gits. " Great idea that! Then we could hang draw and quarter them! Except it is hard to find enough horses these days.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs xhow would they enforce it, easy if your not working because of obesity take this jab that will help you lose weight otherwise we will sanction you because you are not doing anything to help yourselfSo same with smoking then? If you smoke on benefits you'll be sanctioned then? Mrs x" Yes! Smokers, drinkers, dangerous sports, mountain climbing folks, childless couples, the old and infirm, disabled, .... . The list of drains on society is endless. These Fab Fora are a cornucopia if great ideas. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs xhow would they enforce it, easy if your not working because of obesity take this jab that will help you lose weight otherwise we will sanction you because you are not doing anything to help yourselfSo same with smoking then? If you smoke on benefits you'll be sanctioned then? Mrs x Yes! Smokers, drinkers, dangerous sports, mountain climbing folks, childless couples, the old and infirm, disabled, .... . The list of drains on society is endless. These Fab Fora are a cornucopia if great ideas. "Then they ban swinging to reduce the cost of sexual health  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs x We'll have less of this sensible talk in here young lady" Ooooh I'm a lady... , Mrs x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs xhow would they enforce it, easy if your not working because of obesity take this jab that will help you lose weight otherwise we will sanction you because you are not doing anything to help yourselfSo same with smoking then? If you smoke on benefits you'll be sanctioned then? Mrs x Yes! Smokers, drinkers, dangerous sports, mountain climbing folks, childless couples, the old and infirm, disabled, .... . The list of drains on society is endless. These Fab Fora are a cornucopia if great ideas.
Then they ban swinging to reduce the cost of sexual health "Yes!!! Keep them coming guys! The government is monitoring this. What about all the money wasted on pets? Horses! We don't need them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs x We'll have less of this sensible talk in here young ladyOoooh I'm a lady... , Mrs x"Omg I missed the 'young' bit, I'm a YOUNG lady, I'm so happy 😁😘😁 Mrs x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs xhow would they enforce it, easy if your not working because of obesity take this jab that will help you lose weight otherwise we will sanction you because you are not doing anything to help yourselfSo same with smoking then? If you smoke on benefits you'll be sanctioned then? Mrs x Yes! Smokers, drinkers, dangerous sports, mountain climbing folks, childless couples, the old and infirm, disabled, .... . The list of drains on society is endless. These Fab Fora are a cornucopia if great ideas.
Then they ban swinging to reduce the cost of sexual health
Yes!!! Keep them coming guys! The government is monitoring this.
What about all the money wasted on pets? Horses! We don't need them. "Apparently you can get pets from Ubereats. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs xhow would they enforce it, easy if your not working because of obesity take this jab that will help you lose weight otherwise we will sanction you because you are not doing anything to help yourselfSo same with smoking then? If you smoke on benefits you'll be sanctioned then? Mrs x" why would you be sanctioned for smoking? Someone is on sick benefit because there to fat to work I don't know anyone unable to work because they smoke | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs xhow would they enforce it, easy if your not working because of obesity take this jab that will help you lose weight otherwise we will sanction you because you are not doing anything to help yourselfSo same with smoking then? If you smoke on benefits you'll be sanctioned then? Mrs xwhy would you be sanctioned for smoking? Someone is on sick benefit because there to fat to work I don't know anyone unable to work because they smoke" Look up COPD | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lilly invest 270 million into the UK under the heading clinical studies. Labour will then use the Lilly weight loss product on obese out of work people to repay the investment, with the tax payer picking up the tab. Tax payers out of pocket, and big pharma win lucrative contract. In that case I suppose the question is whether it's an even higher burden on the taxpayer to have obese people unable to work and requiring a lifetime of treatment for associated ailments on the NHS. I find it hilarious that teamism is so rife. If this had been proposed two years ago by the Tories certain posters would be lauding the idea and demonising/generalising about obese people and Labour supporters would be condemning it. We now flip 180 LOL Not sure how I feel about Govt forcing anyone to take any kind of drug. They are not going to force anyone, surely not. How would you enforce it? But I think it's a good idea to tackle obesity, the related costs on the health service is horrendous. So if that can reduce that then it can't be a bad thing. If this helps some find employment then that would seem to be a bonus. Mrs xhow would they enforce it, easy if your not working because of obesity take this jab that will help you lose weight otherwise we will sanction you because you are not doing anything to help yourselfSo same with smoking then? If you smoke on benefits you'll be sanctioned then? Mrs xwhy would you be sanctioned for smoking? Someone is on sick benefit because there to fat to work I don't know anyone unable to work because they smoke" Smoking is the major reason for a host of health conditions which could prevent people working. Mrs x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
There is some dystopian novel right there. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Tories fault (obviously) " Austerity has had a negative impact on general health yes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why not just give them laxatives ? And then send them into work? Could be a bit unpleasant
Don't they say you should poop on the boss's time ? "no they say a good worker has 2 shits a day...one before work and one after | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why not just give them laxatives ? And then send them into work? Could be a bit unpleasant
Don't they say you should poop on the boss's time ? no they say a good worker has 2 shits a day...one before work and one after "Who says that? Dictators? I'll be sure never to shit on the company dime | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why not just give them laxatives ? And then send them into work? Could be a bit unpleasant
Don't they say you should poop on the boss's time ? no they say a good worker has 2 shits a day...one before work and one after "But based on productivity, British workers don’t give a shit | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why not just give them laxatives ? And then send them into work? Could be a bit unpleasant
Don't they say you should poop on the boss's time ? no they say a good worker has 2 shits a day...one before work and one after
But based on productivity, British workers don’t give a shit " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Best way is to give them a ration book not money. So they can only get a healthy balanced diet. Problem solved." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
