Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"t’s not about blind loyalty to any one party. Reform, Lib Dems, or even a coalition government might offer something different, but the focus has to be on policies and competence, not just the party label. At the end of the day, we need leaders with a clear strategy to fix public services or even to close some services, get the economy on track, and rebuild trust and that’s where Starmer is struggling. In my opinion, he came out too fast, exposing cracks within his cabinet, and it didn’t look good. Labour’s policies are scattered, and the lack of direction in these first 100 days has only highlighted their inexperience. " So who did you vote for and why? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"t’s not about blind loyalty to any one party. Reform, Lib Dems, or even a coalition government might offer something different, but the focus has to be on policies and competence, not just the party label. At the end of the day, we need leaders with a clear strategy to fix public services or even to close some services, get the economy on track, and rebuild trust and that’s where Starmer is struggling. In my opinion, he came out too fast, exposing cracks within his cabinet, and it didn’t look good. Labour’s policies are scattered, and the lack of direction in these first 100 days has only highlighted their inexperience. " That's more a wish list than reality | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"t’s not about blind loyalty to any one party. Reform, Lib Dems, or even a coalition government might offer something different, but the focus has to be on policies and competence, not just the party label. At the end of the day, we need leaders with a clear strategy to fix public services or even to close some services, get the economy on track, and rebuild trust and that’s where Starmer is struggling. In my opinion, he came out too fast, exposing cracks within his cabinet, and it didn’t look good. Labour’s policies are scattered, and the lack of direction in these first 100 days has only highlighted their inexperience. That's more a wish list than reality " Of course it is, we can live in hope | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"t’s not about blind loyalty to any one party. Reform, Lib Dems, or even a coalition government might offer something different, but the focus has to be on policies and competence, not just the party label. At the end of the day, we need leaders with a clear strategy to fix public services or even to close some services, get the economy on track, and rebuild trust and that’s where Starmer is struggling. In my opinion, he came out too fast, exposing cracks within his cabinet, and it didn’t look good. Labour’s policies are scattered, and the lack of direction in these first 100 days has only highlighted their inexperience. So who did you vote for and why?" I voted for the party that I thought would offer the best outcome for business with the best understanding of economics and the financial sectors, that ticks my main boxes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To those who have spent the last 100 days criticising everything that the current government has performed which party do you think would have done better. Not labour is not an answer." I'm not usually a fan of PR and always thought FPTP brought us stability. But I'm starting to wonder if coalition might a better system of governance after all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To those who have spent the last 100 days criticising everything that the current government has performed which party do you think would have done better. Not labour is not an answer." Conservative, Labour, it's all good (or not). Just. Don't. Be. Stupid. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To those who have spent the last 100 days criticising everything that the current government has performed which party do you think would have done better. Not labour is not an answer." Not liebour | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" At the end of the day, we need leaders with a clear strategy to fix public services or even to close some services, get the economy on track " That’s exactly what we need but let’s be realistic , most economists haven’t got a clue the models they use are so outdated, so it’s highly unlikely any politicians are able to control a complex economy. But if they started just fixing housing and infra everything else might magically improve a bit. It’s not about parties, it’s just a case of waiting for another Thatcher, Blair or Cameron - a smart person with the right plan to come along | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reform "  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reform " If Reform were ever voted in, would they be the first PLC to run the country, well officially we all know PLC's run the country behind the scenes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"t’s not about blind loyalty to any one party. Reform, Lib Dems, or even a coalition government might offer something different, but the focus has to be on policies and competence, not just the party label. At the end of the day, we need leaders with a clear strategy to fix public services or even to close some services, get the economy on track, and rebuild trust and that’s where Starmer is struggling. In my opinion, he came out too fast, exposing cracks within his cabinet, and it didn’t look good. Labour’s policies are scattered, and the lack of direction in these first 100 days has only highlighted their inexperience. So who did you vote for and why? I voted for the party that I thought would offer the best outcome for business with the best understanding of economics and the financial sectors, that ticks my main boxes" Count Bin Face says thanks for your vote | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don’t think it really matters anymore, no matter who gets in the uk is doomed because no government will or will be allowed to put the uk first. Net zero is going to bankrupt us and the unions will hoover up the rest. 4 years is a long time and so much damage can be done in that time. " Reform could be a good option for you. They are science deniers, prioritise the profits of fossil fuels companies, and don't want workers to be represented by unions. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For the avoidance of doubt They're not a PLC as in public limited company. They are very much a Private Limited Company with Farage and Tice main shareholders and financial beneficiaries." that's even worst, a private company in government running the country | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think people advocating for farage's REGRESS ltd taking us back to the 16th century have thought things through properly, if it's democracy they want lmao 🤣" What happened in the 16th century like ?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Iv seen 10 years of labour, useless, 10 years of torries, slightly better but realistically useless. Reform for me although I just can’t see the uk getting any better any time soon. " Which of reforms policies do you think will improve the lives of the British population ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I don't think people advocating for farage's REGRESS ltd taking us back to the 16th century have thought things through properly, if it's democracy they want lmao 🤣 What happened in the 16th century like ??" People demonised scientists. Workers didn't have as many rights. There were no environmental protections. Foreigners were treated as the enemy. That kind of stuff. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Iv seen 10 years of labour, useless, 10 years of torries, slightly better but realistically useless. Reform for me although I just can’t see the uk getting any better any time soon. Which of reforms policies do you think will improve the lives of the British population ?" Redeveloping commodities that we have our own. Heavy machine industries, mining, farming, energy sector. Wind & wave power. Uk has huge potential if people believe in the government and had something given back. There is also the issue of people crossing the Channel. I’m 100% behind diversity and having a multi cultural country but we have no idea who’s coming or going, tougher borders required. I could go on all day. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For the avoidance of doubt They're not a PLC as in public limited company. They are very much a Private Limited Company with Farage and Tice main shareholders and financial beneficiaries." BBC ran a story the other week reporting that farage is giving up ownership of reform. Apparently he was the major share holder before this change. They also say that reform are making changes to how the party is run and its members will now vote on policy motions. Not sure if still classed as a plc or not after the changes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Iv seen 10 years of labour, useless, 10 years of torries, slightly better but realistically useless. Reform for me although I just can’t see the uk getting any better any time soon. Which of reforms policies do you think will improve the lives of the British population ? Redeveloping commodities that we have our own. Heavy machine industries, mining, farming, energy sector. Wind & wave power. Uk has huge potential if people believe in the government and had something given back. There is also the issue of people crossing the Channel. I’m 100% behind diversity and having a multi cultural country but we have no idea who’s coming or going, tougher borders required. I could go on all day. " Reform are in favour of using science and promoting renewable energy? Shocking (if true).  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For the avoidance of doubt They're not a PLC as in public limited company. They are very much a Private Limited Company with Farage and Tice main shareholders and financial beneficiaries. BBC ran a story the other week reporting that farage is giving up ownership of reform. Apparently he was the major share holder before this change. They also say that reform are making changes to how the party is run and its members will now vote on policy motions. Not sure if still classed as a plc or not after the changes" Once they have 150 MPs | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To those who have spent the last 100 days criticising everything that the current government has performed which party do you think would have done better. Not labour is not an answer." It doesn't matter, we are where we are...but don't expect this to be anything more than a one term government | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"For the avoidance of doubt They're not a PLC as in public limited company. They are very much a Private Limited Company with Farage and Tice main shareholders and financial beneficiaries. BBC ran a story the other week reporting that farage is giving up ownership of reform. Apparently he was the major share holder before this change. They also say that reform are making changes to how the party is run and its members will now vote on policy motions. Not sure if still classed as a plc or not after the changes Once they have 150 MPs" The BBC only mention of amount of MP's is in 100 not 150 and is only in relation to members being able to call for a vote of no confidence. It is not related to the shares farage is giving up or the members voting on policy motions | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
