Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A £10 Casio is more accurate than both" The Trump guarantees are extremely limited too, so I'm sure accuracy will be excluded for myriad of reasons. I don't have spare cash for a Rolex or a Trump bit of tatt. And I imagine his Truth social, social media services will quickly lose value, if he doesn't win. More of a gamble, with a good chance of losing, than a sound investment. I've no money for that and I don't gamble | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd feel embarrassed to to wear an expensive watch in 2024. What is the point when when everyone has a phone in their hand." Style and individuality. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The hands look a bit small. I suspect it's more an example of washing money to be injected into the campaign fund or Trumps pocket. An individual, organisation or regime buys a few dozen of the watches. Job done. " People donated vast sums of money into his legal funds to help when he was up for sexual assault, and the other various charges. So I can see them same people forking out $100,000 for this opulent single function device. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The hands look a bit small. I suspect it's more an example of washing money to be injected into the campaign fund or Trumps pocket. An individual, organisation or regime buys a few dozen of the watches. Job done. " You do know he doesn’t manufacture the watch, he licenses his name, he gets a slice? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The hands look a bit small. I suspect it's more an example of washing money to be injected into the campaign fund or Trumps pocket. An individual, organisation or regime buys a few dozen of the watches. Job done. You do know he doesn’t manufacture the watch, he licenses his name, he gets a slice? " I'm aware it's a licensing deal. It's still a naff grift though. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah but all jewellery is arguably a naff grift It is just bits of metal and shiny rock. It's inherently worthless It's only valuable because people agree it is. If everyone decided tomorrow they didn't care about gold as a fashion item the market would disappear " That's it. And there will be a market for these Trump watches. I'm sure people will buy them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The hands look a bit small. I suspect it's more an example of washing money to be injected into the campaign fund or Trumps pocket. An individual, organisation or regime buys a few dozen of the watches. Job done. You do know he doesn’t manufacture the watch, he licenses his name, he gets a slice? I'm aware it's a licensing deal. It's still a naff grift though. " How is it a grift? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The hands look a bit small. I suspect it's more an example of washing money to be injected into the campaign fund or Trumps pocket. An individual, organisation or regime buys a few dozen of the watches. Job done. You do know he doesn’t manufacture the watch, he licenses his name, he gets a slice? I'm aware it's a licensing deal. It's still a naff grift though. How is it a grift?" Apart from the limited gold and diamonds on it, the exact manufacturer of the time keeping element is unknown, so a purported value of a known entity, a Rolex, available for less than half this price, with a known track record and caliber, suggests that it's the hawking of questionable materials for high financial gains. Some may view that akin to grifting especially when there's a legacy of tatt, including sneakers, bibles etc, that haven't demonstrated especially high material value. It doesn't strike me as being of the value | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The hands look a bit small. I suspect it's more an example of washing money to be injected into the campaign fund or Trumps pocket. An individual, organisation or regime buys a few dozen of the watches. Job done. You do know he doesn’t manufacture the watch, he licenses his name, he gets a slice? I'm aware it's a licensing deal. It's still a naff grift though. How is it a grift? Apart from the limited gold and diamonds on it, the exact manufacturer of the time keeping element is unknown, so a purported value of a known entity, a Rolex, available for less than half this price, with a known track record and caliber, suggests that it's the hawking of questionable materials for high financial gains. Some may view that akin to grifting especially when there's a legacy of tatt, including sneakers, bibles etc, that haven't demonstrated especially high material value. It doesn't strike me as being of the value " The product is obviously not for you, if it has a market and sells what is the issue, if doesn't have a market and sells, what is the issue? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |