Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So…that lack of sovereignty by being a member of the EU!!!!" Let's see how the EU reacts to this, and whether they think that Germany has that right to sovereignty. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So…that lack of sovereignty by being a member of the EU!!!! Let's see how the EU reacts to this, and whether they think that Germany has that right to sovereignty." Indeed. But in reality what can they do? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So…that lack of sovereignty by being a member of the EU!!!! Let's see how the EU reacts to this, and whether they think that Germany has that right to sovereignty." ya couldn’t make it up lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So…that lack of sovereignty by being a member of the EU!!!! Let's see how the EU reacts to this, and whether they think that Germany has that right to sovereignty." Member States do not seem as keen as Germany on this from what I read. Apparently some bordering countries with Germany already have border controls. I think this latest move puts borders up with the remaining neighbours, including France. The rise of certain political groups in Germany maybe a factor in this as well as 3 people being murdered by an asylum seeker. Temporary only borders are allowed in the EU as a last resort only to certain threats. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. " I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders." It's a step towards making EU a political organisation instead of it just being an economic union. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders. It's a step towards making EU a political organisation instead of it just being an economic union." I’m convinced they’re already there, it’s Joe Public who need to catch on | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders." They guessed wrong. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders. It's a step towards making EU a political organisation instead of it just being an economic union." It was never about economics. Ever closer union means national governments having less power. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders. It's a step towards making EU a political organisation instead of it just being an economic union. It was never about economics. Ever closer union means national governments having less power." Ah well a United States of Europe on our doorstep with almost 1/2 billion potential customers seems like something it might be good to have good relationships with | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders. It's a step towards making EU a political organisation instead of it just being an economic union. It was never about economics. Ever closer union means national governments having less power. Ah well a United States of Europe on our doorstep with almost 1/2 billion potential customers seems like something it might be good to have good relationships with " What has political union got to do with trade or good relations? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders. It's a step towards making EU a political organisation instead of it just being an economic union. It was never about economics. Ever closer union means national governments having less power. Ah well a United States of Europe on our doorstep with almost 1/2 billion potential customers seems like something it might be good to have good relationships with " Different people have different priorities I guess. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders. It's a step towards making EU a political organisation instead of it just being an economic union. It was never about economics. Ever closer union means national governments having less power. Ah well a United States of Europe on our doorstep with almost 1/2 billion potential customers seems like something it might be good to have good relationships with What has political union got to do with trade or good relations?" I’ll answer that when you explain on the other thread why Harris’ economic policies are analogous to Soviet/Venezuelan policies | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders. It's a step towards making EU a political organisation instead of it just being an economic union. It was never about economics. Ever closer union means national governments having less power. Ah well a United States of Europe on our doorstep with almost 1/2 billion potential customers seems like something it might be good to have good relationships with " As far as I can see we're still trading with Europe and the relationship is fine. Where's the problem? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders. It's a step towards making EU a political organisation instead of it just being an economic union. It was never about economics. Ever closer union means national governments having less power. Ah well a United States of Europe on our doorstep with almost 1/2 billion potential customers seems like something it might be good to have good relationships with As far as I can see we're still trading with Europe and the relationship is fine. Where's the problem?" Never said we weren’t. But if anyone thinks that trade is frictionless like it was before they are living in cloud cuckoo land. The relationship was damaged by the Tories and Brexit. It needs a reset. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ever tried arguing with a German? from personal experience I can say you might not lose the argument but that ain't the same as winning" That made me LOL as I totally get what you mean but couldn’t explain it. Like you walk away having thought you achieved all you wanted but are left with some nagging thoughts that it isn’t actually what just happened! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ever tried arguing with a German? from personal experience I can say you might not lose the argument but that ain't the same as winning That made me LOL as I totally get what you mean but couldn’t explain it. Like you walk away having thought you achieved all you wanted but are left with some nagging thoughts that it isn’t actually what just happened!" haha. it's artful in a way | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a one world globalist or a little Englander but having travelled on the continental I quickly saw the complete sense of the Shengen zone. we went to France, Belgium and the Netherlands (before brexit obviously) and for people living there, it just made sense. to stop at each country's border would be a silly waste of time. free movement on the continent makes COMPLETE sense. anyway what can the EU gonna do now? fine Germany, sanction officials? fire diplomats? or just make Sholtz and the gang write out 'Ich liebe EU' a thousand times? I sure don't envy the week ahead for EU officials. ever tried arguing with a German? from personal experience I can say you might not lose the argument but that ain't the same as winning. " The Schengen zone is one of those utopian ideas that always become victim to the law of unintended consequences. A brilliant idea as long as the external border is secure. It isn't, so Schengen is a complete dogs breakfast. Ever tried arguing with a German? Book, film and T shirt. I'm married to one. How are the border controls working? I'll tell you on Sunday after I drive into Germany from Luxembourg. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should never have been stopped. What idiot thought getting rid of border checks was a good idea? Recipe for disaster. I guess the idea was the border of the EU as a whole should serve the purpose rather than the member state borders. It's a step towards making EU a political organisation instead of it just being an economic union. It was never about economics. Ever closer union means national governments having less power. Ah well a United States of Europe on our doorstep with almost 1/2 billion potential customers seems like something it might be good to have good relationships with As far as I can see we're still trading with Europe and the relationship is fine. Where's the problem? Never said we weren’t. But if anyone thinks that trade is frictionless like it was before they are living in cloud cuckoo land. The relationship was damaged by the Tories and Brexit. It needs a reset. " A reset...hmmm, sounds very much like a lefty term for "please can we come back" to me. This whole thread seems to highlight the issues the good majority of the UK wanted to get away from...ie we'll have our hard and fast rules but it's ok if you break them unless you're the UK. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""... hard and fast rules but it's ok if you break them unless you're the UK" We didn't break 'em, we just "opted out" of 'em! We didn't pay our full whack (the Thatcher rebate), refused the Social Chapter and its protection for workers, didn't join the single currency and so prevent our big banks from manipulating exchange rates..." I think you missed the point. We would abide by the rules when the “good boys of Europe club” broke them, if we deviated from the Euro-Love in -dreamfest we were demonised while France and Germany looked after their own self-interest, and when rules were broken we would do the dutiful thing and accept the clobbering and pay up while France and Germany seemed to never get penalised for anything they did. The “hard and fast” rules seemed to be a bit “jelly and slow” when it came to the “club”. The EU was designed by France and Germany largely for the benefit of France and Germany, successive British governments just tried gaslighting the British people that it wasn’t when we could all see that it was. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |