Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Op using the utterly tragic deaths and those injured innocents in any sort of a comparison for a person with multiple criminal convictions is not good.. " Im not using anything. Im pointing out the obvious. To not point out the obvious, to let this kind of crap continue, is what is not good. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Op using the utterly tragic deaths and those injured innocents in any sort of a comparison for a person with multiple criminal convictions is not good.. Im not using anything. Im pointing out the obvious. To not point out the obvious, to let this kind of crap continue, is what is not good." You have, deliberately and evidently done so.. If you want to start a thread about whether a person arrested under the terrorism laws should have been etc then fine but this is in poor taste.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Op using the utterly tragic deaths and those injured innocents in any sort of a comparison for a person with multiple criminal convictions is not good.. Im not using anything. Im pointing out the obvious. To not point out the obvious, to let this kind of crap continue, is what is not good. You have, deliberately and evidently done so.. If you want to start a thread about whether a person arrested under the terrorism laws should have been etc then fine but this is in poor taste.. " It is poor taste. The whole situation is extraordinarily poor taste. Just because it tastes bad, does that mean we shouldn't chew it over and figure out why it is such poor taste? The truth hurts, and the poor tasting realism of our world needs be shone over with a torch and made available to all. Only then can any real change be brought about. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So a man (as yet undescribed... usually means one thing) " Muslim? " attacks a nursery with a Knife, kills at least one child and severely injures many others. Not terrorism. " Sounds like murder. " ................ Tommy Robinson, organises a march and fights against such reasons as to cause the above paragraph. " You mean he's a massive racist scumbag? " Gets arrested and interrogated under terrorism laws. ............... How governance, our society, our civilization is backwards. It is not showing any sign of reversing the full steam ahead to crazy town. Yet people seem void of interest to change it. Instead we let those "in charge", keep on keeping on. " How do you feel about the guy who got 5 years for protesting? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, kinda the responses I'd expect tbh. How about we just don't talk about it, and let it continue down this path. Wheres some sand, need to go be an Ostridge like the rest." You don't want to talk about the things you started the thread about? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, kinda the responses I'd expect tbh. How about we just don't talk about it, and let it continue down this path. Wheres some sand, need to go be an Ostridge like the rest. You don't want to talk about the things you started the thread about?" Oh I do, but you wanted to change the discussion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, kinda the responses I'd expect tbh. How about we just don't talk about it, and let it continue down this path. Wheres some sand, need to go be an Ostridge like the rest. You don't want to talk about the things you started the thread about? Oh I do, but you wanted to change the discussion. " I'm confused. You tried to suggest that a murder case should be treated as terrorism. No idea why. And then, completely unrelated, complained about Tommy Robinson being investigated. And now you don't want to talk about these things. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, kinda the responses I'd expect tbh. How about we just don't talk about it, and let it continue down this path. Wheres some sand, need to go be an Ostridge like the rest. You don't want to talk about the things you started the thread about? Oh I do, but you wanted to change the discussion. I'm confused. You tried to suggest that a murder case should be treated as terrorism. No idea why. And then, completely unrelated, complained about Tommy Robinson being investigated. And now you don't want to talk about these things. " You're very right. You are very confused indeed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, kinda the responses I'd expect tbh. How about we just don't talk about it, and let it continue down this path. Wheres some sand, need to go be an Ostridge like the rest. You don't want to talk about the things you started the thread about? Oh I do, but you wanted to change the discussion. I'm confused. You tried to suggest that a murder case should be treated as terrorism. No idea why. And then, completely unrelated, complained about Tommy Robinson being investigated. And now you don't want to talk about these things. You're very right. You are very confused indeed." Maybe you could point out where I misunderstood you? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, kinda the responses I'd expect tbh. How about we just don't talk about it, and let it continue down this path. Wheres some sand, need to go be an Ostridge like the rest. You don't want to talk about the things you started the thread about? Oh I do, but you wanted to change the discussion. I'm confused. You tried to suggest that a murder case should be treated as terrorism. No idea why. And then, completely unrelated, complained about Tommy Robinson being investigated. And now you don't want to talk about these things. You're very right. You are very confused indeed. Maybe you could point out where I misunderstood you?" Le sigh To even start getting you to understand, we would need to roll back to basics. I really cba with trying to educate what 2+2 means to you. That you seem to think murdering and butchering children is not terrorism, is my reference for having to teach you what 2+2 means. Not to mention, I incur that you have no intention of any form of discussion due to your inept attitude with which you form your points and or arguments, except in that of sarcasm and "trolling". I bid thee, farewell. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, kinda the responses I'd expect tbh. How about we just don't talk about it, and let it continue down this path. Wheres some sand, need to go be an Ostridge like the rest. You don't want to talk about the things you started the thread about? Oh I do, but you wanted to change the discussion. I'm confused. You tried to suggest that a murder case should be treated as terrorism. No idea why. And then, completely unrelated, complained about Tommy Robinson being investigated. And now you don't want to talk about these things. You're very right. You are very confused indeed. Maybe you could point out where I misunderstood you? Le sigh To even start getting you to understand, we would need to roll back to basics. I really cba with trying to educate what 2+2 means to you. That you seem to think murdering and butchering children is not terrorism, is my reference for having to teach you what 2+2 means. " It's murder. Why do you think it's terrorism? " Not to mention, I incur that you have no intention of any form of discussion due to your inept attitude with which you form your points and or arguments, except in that of sarcasm and "trolling". I bid thee, farewell." So you're unable to articulate your point, and have to resort to childish jibes? Excellent work. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, kinda the responses I'd expect tbh. How about we just don't talk about it, and let it continue down this path. Wheres some sand, need to go be an Ostridge like the rest." You shouldn't have expected anything else...  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, kinda the responses I'd expect tbh. How about we just don't talk about it, and let it continue down this path. Wheres some sand, need to go be an Ostridge like the rest. You don't want to talk about the things you started the thread about? Oh I do, but you wanted to change the discussion. I'm confused. You tried to suggest that a murder case should be treated as terrorism. No idea why. And then, completely unrelated, complained about Tommy Robinson being investigated. And now you don't want to talk about these things. You're very right. You are very confused indeed. Maybe you could point out where I misunderstood you? Le sigh To even start getting you to understand, we would need to roll back to basics. I really cba with trying to educate what 2+2 means to you. That you seem to think murdering and butchering children is not terrorism, is my reference for having to teach you what 2+2 means. Not to mention, I incur that you have no intention of any form of discussion due to your inept attitude with which you form your points and or arguments, except in that of sarcasm and "trolling". I bid thee, farewell." ********************************* You've done the right thing, leave these trolls to their own 'views', such as they are. There's one in particular, has no integrity and uses classic 'smoke and mirrors' techniques. It seems to be points based and classic virtue signalling. That said, all views on here are entirely irrelevant, even my own, but that said, my posts are with conviction and factual. My very very last post this is.....!!! Over to the fantasists now, apologies to the minority genuine. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What incident is the OP referring to and why is this case of murder an act of terrorism? Mrs x " My guess is the OP is too afraid to say. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What incident is the OP referring to and why is this case of murder an act of terrorism? Mrs x My guess is the OP is too afraid to say." Why? Am I missing g something? Mrs x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What incident is the OP referring to and why is this case of murder an act of terrorism? Mrs x My guess is the OP is too afraid to say.Why? Am I missing g something? Mrs x" The OP said "as yet undescribed... usually means one thing". I asked directly if he meant "Muslim". The OP then goes on to admire Tommy Robinson "Tommy Robinson, organises a march and fights against such reasons as to cause the above paragraph." Then gets flustered when asked for some clarification. So I have a made a guess. But let's see if they want to come back and explain what they mean. Maybe I'm completely wrong. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What incident is the OP referring to and why is this case of murder an act of terrorism? Mrs x My guess is the OP is too afraid to say.Why? Am I missing g something? Mrs x The OP said "as yet undescribed... usually means one thing". I asked directly if he meant "Muslim". The OP then goes on to admire Tommy Robinson "Tommy Robinson, organises a march and fights against such reasons as to cause the above paragraph." Then gets flustered when asked for some clarification. So I have a made a guess. But let's see if they want to come back and explain what they mean. Maybe I'm completely wrong. " Has the murder happened recently or is it historical? Mrs x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What incident is the OP referring to and why is this case of murder an act of terrorism? Mrs x My guess is the OP is too afraid to say.Why? Am I missing g something? Mrs x The OP said "as yet undescribed... usually means one thing". I asked directly if he meant "Muslim". The OP then goes on to admire Tommy Robinson "Tommy Robinson, organises a march and fights against such reasons as to cause the above paragraph." Then gets flustered when asked for some clarification. So I have a made a guess. But let's see if they want to come back and explain what they mean. Maybe I'm completely wrong. Has the murder happened recently or is it historical? Mrs x" I believe it happened on Monday. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What incident is the OP referring to and why is this case of murder an act of terrorism? Mrs x My guess is the OP is too afraid to say.Why? Am I missing g something? Mrs x The OP said "as yet undescribed... usually means one thing". I asked directly if he meant "Muslim". The OP then goes on to admire Tommy Robinson "Tommy Robinson, organises a march and fights against such reasons as to cause the above paragraph." Then gets flustered when asked for some clarification. So I have a made a guess. But let's see if they want to come back and explain what they mean. Maybe I'm completely wrong. Has the murder happened recently or is it historical? Mrs x" It happened today. In Southport. A man, who has not been named but police have said he is 17 years old and originally from Cardiff, stabbed over 10 people, mostly children, killing 2 (at present). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Haven't the Police said they are not currently treating it as a terrorist attack? Why does the OP think it is? Mrs x" Do you have a guess as to why the OP thinks it is? Taking into account his comparison with someone he seems to admire in TR. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Haven't the Police said they are not currently treating it as a terrorist attack? Why does the OP think it is? Mrs x" Correct. I don't know why the OP thinks it is, it could be, the police do lie quite a lot. My best guess is a name has been leaked and that name sounds Arabic. There has only been claims of the suspect shouting Allahu Akbar. Unconfirmed as far as I know. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Haven't the Police said they are not currently treating it as a terrorist attack? Why does the OP think it is? Mrs x Do you have a guess as to why the OP thinks it is? Taking into account his comparison with someone he seems to admire in TR." Let's be clear here. The OP didn't compare the 2, he compared the 'offences'. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Haven't the Police said they are not currently treating it as a terrorist attack? Why does the OP think it is? Mrs x" The attack bears all the hallmarks of one, many other such attacks have been labelled as so. Even ones which, can be described as lesser attacks, have been labelled as such. The reason I believe the police don't want to label it so, is to attempt to stave any public unrest. Which would be greatly justified imo. .................. I admire this johnny guys trollish persistence. Yet I smirk as I cross his brudge unhindered. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x" Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Haven't the Police said they are not currently treating it as a terrorist attack? Why does the OP think it is? Mrs x The attack bears all the hallmarks of one, many other such attacks have been labelled as so. Even ones which, can be described as lesser attacks, have been labelled as such. The reason I believe the police don't want to label it so, is to attempt to stave any public unrest. Which would be greatly justified imo. .................. I admire this johnny guys trollish persistence. Yet I smirk as I cross his brudge unhindered." Don't you need a definitive 'terrorism' element before you can class these horrendous murders as such? Mrs x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. " Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x" Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So what border did he cross? Mrs x" UK France. He lives in Spain. Possibly knew he was gonna be done for contempt. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So what border did he cross? Mrs x" He was at the channel tunnel, whether he crossed the border or not, I don't know, but it doesn't matter, he was at the border. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. " I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff " What’s impressive? His level of support or himself? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff " Impressive is a poor choice of words from you, they're the same people types who turned up to 'protect' the Cenotaph and attacked the Police last remembrance weekend.. Two Police were hospitalised and seven others injured by a tanked up mob, some carrying weapons and a bit of class A who abused and fought with the officers telling them they weren't English for doing their duty.. A mob of far right thugs nothing more.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"he repeated a libel which the courts already ajudged as complete bullshit (ie show a film that repeated the libel to several thousand other bullshitters). he was warned not repeat the libel, but he did anyway. now he is in contempt and seemingly has attempted to do a runner and avoid showing up in court to face his rightful punishment. he will probably be punished more severly now. it appears he's not very intelligent." All of that is true but has nothing to do with his arrest. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff " Yes I was watching a few clips of his march on Saturday and seemed pretty well attended and good natured. Robinson himself is actually better spoken than one would expect given all the MSM and political vitriol levelled against him. He obviously hasn’t had a significant amount of formal education but speaks well nonetheless and one should try not to be too snobby about people who haven’t had the same opportunities in life as one has had oneself. He interviews some interesting characters sometimes who one would never see in the MSM. Robinson himself is really just the lightning rod for a wider movement. I imagine the establishment would be quite terrified of a well organised grass roots movement rising up outside of their control and which can’t be bought off with sinecures and titles etc. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff Yes I was watching a few clips of his march on Saturday and seemed pretty well attended and good natured. Robinson himself is actually better spoken than one would expect given all the MSM and political vitriol levelled against him. He obviously hasn’t had a significant amount of formal education but speaks well nonetheless and one should try not to be too snobby about people who haven’t had the same opportunities in life as one has had oneself. He interviews some interesting characters sometimes who one would never see in the MSM. Robinson himself is really just the lightning rod for a wider movement. I imagine the establishment would be quite terrified of a well organised grass roots movement rising up outside of their control and which can’t be bought off with sinecures and titles etc." Or he's just a well organised racist. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Or he's just a well organised racist." no... he's just a scumbag and this country's sick of scumbags | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Or he's just a well organised racist. no... he's just a scumbag and this country's sick of scumbags" As the chap I replied to, and the OP demonstrated, some people admire him. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff Yes I was watching a few clips of his march on Saturday and seemed pretty well attended and good natured. Robinson himself is actually better spoken than one would expect given all the MSM and political vitriol levelled against him. He obviously hasn’t had a significant amount of formal education but speaks well nonetheless and one should try not to be too snobby about people who haven’t had the same opportunities in life as one has had oneself. He interviews some interesting characters sometimes who one would never see in the MSM. Robinson himself is really just the lightning rod for a wider movement. I imagine the establishment would be quite terrified of a well organised grass roots movement rising up outside of their control and which can’t be bought off with sinecures and titles etc. Or he's just a well organised racist." Isn’t everyone….. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff Yes I was watching a few clips of his march on Saturday and seemed pretty well attended and good natured. Robinson himself is actually better spoken than one would expect given all the MSM and political vitriol levelled against him. He obviously hasn’t had a significant amount of formal education but speaks well nonetheless and one should try not to be too snobby about people who haven’t had the same opportunities in life as one has had oneself. He interviews some interesting characters sometimes who one would never see in the MSM. Robinson himself is really just the lightning rod for a wider movement. I imagine the establishment would be quite terrified of a well organised grass roots movement rising up outside of their control and which can’t be bought off with sinecures and titles etc. Or he's just a well organised racist. Isn’t everyone….." Some people aren't racist. Shocking, I know. Some people aren't well organised too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff Impressive is a poor choice of words from you, they're the same people types who turned up to 'protect' the Cenotaph and attacked the Police last remembrance weekend.. Two Police were hospitalised and seven others injured by a tanked up mob, some carrying weapons and a bit of class A who abused and fought with the officers telling them they weren't English for doing their duty.. A mob of far right thugs nothing more.." I thought the numbers in attendance was impressive. If I had said the people and politics was impressive, then I could see why you would say it was a poor choice of wording, but as I didn’t 👀 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff Impressive is a poor choice of words from you, they're the same people types who turned up to 'protect' the Cenotaph and attacked the Police last remembrance weekend.. Two Police were hospitalised and seven others injured by a tanked up mob, some carrying weapons and a bit of class A who abused and fought with the officers telling them they weren't English for doing their duty.. A mob of far right thugs nothing more.. I thought the numbers in attendance was impressive. If I had said the people and politics was impressive, then I could see why you would say it was a poor choice of wording, but as I didn’t 👀 " They are extremely likely to be the same types of (some will in all likelihood have been there too) people who answered his dog whistle last November, except this time they're showing support for him further putting two fingers up to a breach of contempt of court.. Impressive support for him with his views and history is something we should all be wary of.. Large support maybe but there's nothing impressive about them in my opinion.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff Impressive is a poor choice of words from you, they're the same people types who turned up to 'protect' the Cenotaph and attacked the Police last remembrance weekend.. Two Police were hospitalised and seven others injured by a tanked up mob, some carrying weapons and a bit of class A who abused and fought with the officers telling them they weren't English for doing their duty.. A mob of far right thugs nothing more.. I thought the numbers in attendance was impressive. If I had said the people and politics was impressive, then I could see why you would say it was a poor choice of wording, but as I didn’t 👀 " The number of racist knuckle draggers was impressive? Depressing indictment of modern Britain would be more accurate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What was TR arrested for? Mrs x Failing to comply with a section 7 stop. Sorry but can you explain what that means in layman terms please? Mrs x Schedule 7 of The Counter Terrorism Act 2000 allows police to detain, question and 'examine' anyone crossing a UK border. 'Examine' includes personal possessions like phone etc. All of this is done without arrest. Anyone detained does not have the 'right to remain silent'. From whT the police have said, he refused to comply (no idea on what part) so he was subsequently arrested. I have been watching this unfold and I'm not sure what is actually happening, other than claims he showed a documentary he made that is banned here. I can see he has gathered a lot of support, rather impressive to be honest from what I saw on Saturday. Is he rattling the cage too hard? I have a feeling he will be in prison when / if he returns. All cloak and dagger stuff Impressive is a poor choice of words from you, they're the same people types who turned up to 'protect' the Cenotaph and attacked the Police last remembrance weekend.. Two Police were hospitalised and seven others injured by a tanked up mob, some carrying weapons and a bit of class A who abused and fought with the officers telling them they weren't English for doing their duty.. A mob of far right thugs nothing more.. I thought the numbers in attendance was impressive. If I had said the people and politics was impressive, then I could see why you would say it was a poor choice of wording, but as I didn’t 👀 The number of racist knuckle draggers was impressive? Depressing indictment of modern Britain would be more accurate. " Blimey we are having difficulty with separation here…. But never mind | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
