Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's actually standing in the rain with NO cover over him! He's only had a year to plan this - what is going on?
"He is the commander in chief and as such stands in the weather same as rest of the troops. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He's actually standing in the rain with NO cover over him! He's only had a year to plan this - what is going on?
"Things Can Only Get Better. Another sign of Tory Austerity. No umbrella for our Monarch. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Kinda missed the jibe - but hey ho "You're being to subtle. A reference to drippy Rishi? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Things Can Only Get Better. " D: Ream Said they can't lmao. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Kinda missed the jibe - but hey ho
You're being to subtle. A reference to drippy Rishi?"Hardly subtle lol.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reall does any one care about the king ffs" I don't. But around 7 or 8 million people do normally I was only watching for Kate and any deliberate alterations to her outfit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reall does any one care about the king ffs I don't. But around 7 or 8 million people do normally I was only watching for Kate and any deliberate alterations to her outfit. "iv just seen them on tv stood on the balcony have you ever seen bunch of misfits like it pmsl should of had the cast of shameless on instead atleast there’s a looker or two in them | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reall does any one care about the king ffs I don't. But around 7 or 8 million people do normally I was only watching for Kate and any deliberate alterations to her outfit. iv just seen them on tv stood on the balcony have you ever seen bunch of misfits like it pmsl should of had the cast of shameless on instead atleast there’s a looker or two in them "Ahhh but do remember they bring in billions every year lol.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reall does any one care about the king ffs I don't. But around 7 or 8 million people do normally I was only watching for Kate and any deliberate alterations to her outfit. iv just seen them on tv stood on the balcony have you ever seen bunch of misfits like it pmsl should of had the cast of shameless on instead atleast there’s a looker or two in them
Ahhh but do remember they bring in billions every year lol.
"yes ppl most be coming here just to see that squad what a Bonny bunch eh just embarrassing | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reall does any one care about the king ffs I don't. But around 7 or 8 million people do normally I was only watching for Kate and any deliberate alterations to her outfit. iv just seen them on tv stood on the balcony have you ever seen bunch of misfits like it pmsl should of had the cast of shameless on instead atleast there’s a looker or two in them
Ahhh but do remember they bring in billions every year lol.
yes ppl most be coming here just to see that squad what a Bonny bunch eh just embarrassing "What would be your suggestion for an alternative Constitutional Head? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Reall does any one care about the king ffs" I do | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""What would be your suggestion for an alternative Constitutional Head?" An elected President would be an obvious alternative. Or, as we like referendums so much, we could have a plebiscite like the Germans had in 1934. 89.93% majority for Nigel Farage?" Oh I see, so we exchange a benign, hard working, loyal and transparent monarchy for a president. You mean like Putin, Xi or Kim Jong Un (elected themselves for life) or Berlusconi (corrupt) or Trump (mad and corrupt) or Biden (advanced dementia). No thanks, I'll stay with KCIII. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""What would be your suggestion for an alternative Constitutional Head?" An elected President would be an obvious alternative. Or, as we like referendums so much, we could have a plebiscite like the Germans had in 1934. 89.93% majority for Nigel Farage? Oh I see, so we exchange a benign, hard working, loyal and transparent monarchy for a president. You mean like Putin, Xi or Kim Jong Un (elected themselves for life) or Berlusconi (corrupt) or Trump (mad and corrupt) or Biden (advanced dementia). No thanks, I'll stay with KCIII." you lost the argument when you said hardworking and loyal ffs | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""What would be your suggestion for an alternative Constitutional Head?" An elected President would be an obvious alternative. Or, as we like referendums so much, we could have a plebiscite like the Germans had in 1934. 89.93% majority for Nigel Farage? Oh I see, so we exchange a benign, hard working, loyal and transparent monarchy for a president. You mean like Putin, Xi or Kim Jong Un (elected themselves for life) or Berlusconi (corrupt) or Trump (mad and corrupt) or Biden (advanced dementia). No thanks, I'll stay with KCIII.you lost the argument when you said hardworking and loyal ffs" I doubt you've got a clue what the Constitutional Head does. You should enlighten yourself. But it's fair to say he and the broader RF put in a shift that would shame most. And you doubt the monarch is loyal? FFS don't you realise the Police, Military, Judges, Politicians swear allegiance to the Crown? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hey you are right: The King and Commander in Chief reviewing his troops and: Drippy Rishi Sunk (sic) announcing an election and starting his own campaign to win our votes They are not the same thing! Both standing in the rain is, however. "Nah one looks like he is paying respect and thanking the loyalty of the military by enduring the same weather as them and the other looks like a complete and desperate drip. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope. Both standing in the rain is the same. Maybe give your TV screen a wipe. "Symbolically very different. Give your critical thinking a reboot | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No." Yes We could do this all day but it would be rather dull  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope. Both standing in the rain is the same. Maybe give your TV screen a wipe. "King Charles had a duty to stand there and he did. His and his families life challenges are playing out for all to see and he his still continuing to conduct his duties with dignity. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sunak had a duty to stand and tell the people he was announcing the start of the election. Fuck it let's wait for it to stop raining first. What nobody is saying is that 3 mins before he came out it actually wasn't raining. (Remember the blonde guy wiring up mics?) But the haters just need to express themselves with sophomore commentary. Sad reflection of the polarised society we live in these days "I'm afraid you have totally lost me in the way you are presenting this. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hey you are right: The King and Commander in Chief reviewing his troops and: Drippy Rishi Sunk (sic) announcing an election and starting his own campaign to win our votes They are not the same thing! Both standing in the rain is, however.
Nah one looks like he is paying respect and thanking the loyalty of the military by enduring the same weather as them and the other looks like a complete and desperate drip.
"I’m not sure it’s really a big deal Sunak getting caught in the rain. Aside from for people making petty political points. The weather looks fine so you go outside and you get caught in the rain. It’s Britain. It’s happened to all of us hundreds of times. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hey you are right: The King and Commander in Chief reviewing his troops and: Drippy Rishi Sunk (sic) announcing an election and starting his own campaign to win our votes They are not the same thing! Both standing in the rain is, however.
Nah one looks like he is paying respect and thanking the loyalty of the military by enduring the same weather as them and the other looks like a complete and desperate drip.
I’m not sure it’s really a big deal Sunak getting caught in the rain. Aside from for people making petty political points.
The weather looks fine so you go outside and you get caught in the rain. It’s Britain. It’s happened to all of us hundreds of times." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hey you are right: The King and Commander in Chief reviewing his troops and: Drippy Rishi Sunk (sic) announcing an election and starting his own campaign to win our votes They are not the same thing! Both standing in the rain is, however.
Nah one looks like he is paying respect and thanking the loyalty of the military by enduring the same weather as them and the other looks like a complete and desperate drip.
I’m not sure it’s really a big deal Sunak getting caught in the rain. Aside from for people making petty political points.
The weather looks fine so you go outside and you get caught in the rain. It’s Britain. It’s happened to all of us hundreds of times.
"Ah, the penny drops | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope. Both standing in the rain is the same. Maybe give your TV screen a wipe.
King Charles had a duty to stand there and he did.
His and his families life challenges are playing out for all to see and he his still continuing to conduct his duties with dignity."Sense of duty. Now there's a thing. Almost an old fashioned concept. Yet a man with cancer does it uncomplainingly stood in the rain. Ditto his daughter-in-law. Yet people want to replace them with sleazy despots. WTF?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope. Both standing in the rain is the same. Maybe give your TV screen a wipe.
King Charles had a duty to stand there and he did.
His and his families life challenges are playing out for all to see and he his still continuing to conduct his duties with dignity.
Sense of duty. Now there's a thing. Almost an old fashioned concept. Yet a man with cancer does it uncomplainingly stood in the rain. Ditto his daughter-in-law. Yet people want to replace them with sleazy despots. WTF??"I'm sure King Charles wouldn't be 'stood' anywhere. He went to a better school than most. He would have been standing, like Sunak will be in the forthcoming election. Unless, of course, Sunak is being 'stood' by puppeters who control him! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nope. Both standing in the rain is the same. Maybe give your TV screen a wipe.
King Charles had a duty to stand there and he did.
His and his families life challenges are playing out for all to see and he his still continuing to conduct his duties with dignity.
Sense of duty. Now there's a thing. Almost an old fashioned concept. Yet a man with cancer does it uncomplainingly stood in the rain. Ditto his daughter-in-law. Yet people want to replace them with sleazy despots. WTF??
I'm sure King Charles wouldn't be 'stood' anywhere. He went to a better school than most.
He would have been standing, like Sunak will be in the forthcoming election.
Unless, of course, Sunak is being 'stood' by puppeters who control him! "I'm not sure I under'stood' your point? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s really odd the hill some people want to die on. Intelligent people who don’t seem to understand that while something in isolation may really be rather inconsequential, when viewed within a wider context and in a world where, rightly or wrongly, optics matter, that it creates a wider collective impression that may be detrimental. To then try and draw equivalence with something quite different is just plain odd? " Again. Sunak had a duty to stand and tell the people he was announcing the start of the election. But fuck it, let's wait for it to stop raining first. What nobody is saying is that 3 mins before he came out, it actually wasn't raining. (Remember the blonde guy wiring up mics?) **** But the haters just need to express themselves with sophomore commentary. **** Sad reflection of the polarised society we live in these days. 'Optics' is a MEDIA INVENTION and way of diverting honest discourse to create the very 'NEWS' that you think that you are reading. It's also an excuse for the piss-poor news-gathering that they call journalism these days. And people like you fall for. It's a way to make you go Oo! and Ah! And giggle like demented, ill-educated school children. They gave you the word 'optics' to make all those items like 'Oh My God Kate has adjusted her photograph, she's so dishonest' sound like it actually really mattered! But that's okay, there has to be reader-fodder after all - who would buy the crap end of news if there wasn't? So Sunak stood in the rain - the cackling children of press and public will love this one - Really? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Politicians keep telling us that they control the climate 100 years from now, if only we buy their products! But here’s Sunak can’t control the weather five minutes from now. Clearly a man out of his depth. He Must Go!" Ah, I see it now. He missed the Rain Dance Seminar Earlier. Silly Sunak. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It’s really odd the hill some people want to die on. Intelligent people who don’t seem to understand that while something in isolation may really be rather inconsequential, when viewed within a wider context and in a world where, rightly or wrongly, optics matter, that it creates a wider collective impression that may be detrimental. To then try and draw equivalence with something quite different is just plain odd? Again. Sunak had a duty to stand and tell the people he was announcing the start of the election. But fuck it, let's wait for it to stop raining first. What nobody is saying is that 3 mins before he came out, it actually wasn't raining. (Remember the blonde guy wiring up mics?) **** But the haters just need to express themselves with sophomore commentary. **** Sad reflection of the polarised society we live in these days. 'Optics' is a MEDIA INVENTION and way of diverting honest discourse to create the very 'NEWS' that you think that you are reading. It's also an excuse for the piss-poor news-gathering that they call journalism these days. And people like you fall for. It's a way to make you go Oo! and Ah! And giggle like demented, ill-educated school children. They gave you the word 'optics' to make all those items like 'Oh My God Kate has adjusted her photograph, she's so dishonest' sound like it actually really mattered! But that's okay, there has to be reader-fodder after all - who would buy the crap end of news if there wasn't? So Sunak stood in the rain - the cackling children of press and public will love this one - Really? "Oh wow you do have a high opinion of yourself and your superior intellect don’t you! Is it because you did a degree? I reckon there’s a few on here who did degrees
As for “people like you fall for it” ha ha ha ha ha you know nothing about me or what education I have or what I do for a living. You also seem to think if someone makes a commentary on an issue that they believe or subscribe to the thing they are saying! I would hope a graduate would have far more adept critical thinking!
I personally don’t give a damn if Sunak stood in the rain. But in the current world “optics matter” as any PR consultant, media expert or Communications professional will tell you. It doesn’t matter if you or I think that is silly, it is the current reality. Didn’t your degree include a media module? If so then you know this regardless of how much you rail against it!
Sunak’s campaign has been stumbling from one silly decision to another. It makes him and his team look disorganised, uncoordinated, and poor at planning. Not good traits for the PM.
Oh and BTW “it wasn’t raining a few minutes before” LMAO looking out the window is so 20th century. We have weather apps that can give you all the info you need (or look out the window on the other side of No.10 to see if there are clouds incoming!)  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Oh wow you do have a high opinion of yourself and your superior intellect don’t you! . . . " Stopped reading just here
But. It's just the epitome of wisdom to obsess over the most trivial details because, obviously, the grand tapestry of life hinges on those minuscule threads. And who wouldn’t want to waste their precious time crafting the perfect narrative to appease the almighty gods of optics? Because, let's face it, the world is nothing more than a stage for public perception, and actual substance? Pfft, who needs that? Drawing parallels between different things? How bizarre! It's not like humans have been using metaphors and analogies since the dawn of language or anything. Clearly, the only sensible approach is to overanalyze everything through the lens of public opinion. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Oh wow you do have a high opinion of yourself and your superior intellect don’t you! . . . Stopped reading just here
But. It's just the epitome of wisdom to obsess over the most trivial details because, obviously, the grand tapestry of life hinges on those minuscule threads. And who wouldn’t want to waste their precious time crafting the perfect narrative to appease the almighty gods of optics? Because, let's face it, the world is nothing more than a stage for public perception, and actual substance? Pfft, who needs that? Drawing parallels between different things? How bizarre! It's not like humans have been using metaphors and analogies since the dawn of language or anything. Clearly, the only sensible approach is to overanalyze everything through the lens of public opinion."This gets better. YOU are the OP and yet you don’t see the irony in your pontificating | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"hahaha you are so funny. Slow your horse down, he needs a rest. Read back - but properly this time. "I am funny thanks for acknowledging (seems to be your go to passive aggressive insult every time you are on the back foot, you need new material) . You need to stop digging. The number of times you start a thread with what you believe to be a mic drop moment, when it actually isn’t, is rather tiresome. It’s fine, you do you if it makes you happy | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Simple answer - don't read it." We all need some entertainment and the flip flopping is fun to observe. Or should that be: **********the FLIP FLOPPING is fun to observe*********** It’s all good. I bear no malice whatsoever. Just from time-to-time feel the need to have a dig when you turn up the patronising dial | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
and embarrassing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a 'dig'? how very childish. and embarrassing. "Not really. Just shining a light on poor behaviour. Saying that though, we can all twiddle out dials… BTW it should really be written as [sic] not (sic) but no need to thank me | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a 'dig'? how very childish. and embarrassing.
Not really. Just shining a light on poor behaviour. Saying that though, we can all twiddle out dials…
BTW it should really be written as [sic] not (sic) but no need to thank me "'How to use sic. Sic is usually found in brackets or parentheses, and it can also be italicized. If you want to quote someone or something in your work, and you notice the source material contains a spelling or grammatical error, you use sic to denote the error by placing it right after the mistake.' My pleasure. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Have a 'dig'? how very childish. and embarrassing.
Not really. Just shining a light on poor behaviour. Saying that though, we can all twiddle out dials…
BTW it should really be written as [sic] not (sic) but no need to thank me
'How to use sic. Sic is usually found in brackets or parentheses, and it can also be italicized. If you want to quote someone or something in your work, and you notice the source material contains a spelling or grammatical error, you use sic to denote the error by placing it right after the mistake.'
My pleasure. "(sic) (with square-brackets usually) is an abbreviation of 'sic erat scriptum' which is Latin for 'thus it had been written', meaning that the quote prior was transcribed as it was found in the original source, complete with errors, coloquialisms etc. You’re welcome too | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ... I'm sure King Charles wouldn't be 'stood' anywhere. He went to a better school than most. He would have been standing, like Sunak will be in the forthcoming election. Unless, of course, Sunak is being 'stood' by puppeters who control him! I'm not sure I under'stood' your point?" Oh yes you did, I sincerely hope. Millions wouldn't, though. I don't think the King would ever be 'sat' either, even on his throne! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
(sic) See you wrote it perfectly. Took you ages to look it up, though.
BTW, did you think I used it because I just thought is looked good at the end of your error in spelling, or perhaps because you had an error in your spelling?
Omnium minutias nihil significat. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ... I'm sure King Charles wouldn't be 'stood' anywhere. He went to a better school than most. He would have been standing, like Sunak will be in the forthcoming election. Unless, of course, Sunak is being 'stood' by puppeters who control him! I'm not sure I under'stood' your point? Oh yes you did, I sincerely hope. Millions wouldn't, though. I don't think the King would ever be 'sat' either, even on his throne!" He was sat at the Trooping of the colour for most of the morning  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"See. You can learn things.
(sic) See you wrote it perfectly. Took you ages to look it up, though.
BTW, did you think I used it because I just thought is looked good at the end of your error in spelling, or perhaps because you had an error in your spelling?
Omnium minutias nihil significat. "Actually I wasn’t looking it up. I do have a life away from Fab lol! The point still stands that using [xxx] is better than (xxx) because it cannot be mistaken as being a continuation of your sentence (as you should know). No you used it because you thought I made a spelling mistake or a typo and wanted to indicate as such (and yes because you thought it made you look clever). However, calling him Sunk was a deliberate choice (albeit childish) as indicated by also calling him Drippy Rishi. Off shopping then lunch now so unlikely to quickly reply | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""What would be your suggestion for an alternative Constitutional Head?" An elected President would be an obvious alternative. Or, as we like referendums so much, we could have a plebiscite like the Germans had in 1934. 89.93% majority for Nigel Farage? Oh I see, so we exchange a benign, hard working, loyal and transparent monarchy for a president. You mean like Putin, Xi or Kim Jong Un (elected themselves for life) or Berlusconi (corrupt) or Trump (mad and corrupt) or Biden (advanced dementia). No thanks, I'll stay with KCIII.you lost the argument when you said hardworking and loyal ffs I doubt you've got a clue what the Constitutional Head does. You should enlighten yourself. But it's fair to say he and the broader RF put in a shift that would shame most. And you doubt the monarch is loyal? FFS don't you realise the Police, Military, Judges, Politicians swear allegiance to the Crown?" a shift pmsl driven by limo doors open for him pulls a cord makes a ten min spearhead eats dinner of the finest chef in the area sips finest wine the whisked away in limo back to his palace and you call that a shift it’s a day out for anyone else for ppl to say they put in a shift is embarrassing to the ppl that actually do | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ... I'm sure King Charles wouldn't be 'stood' anywhere. He went to a better school than most. He would have been standing, like Sunak will be in the forthcoming election. Unless, of course, Sunak is being 'stood' by puppeters who control him! I'm not sure I under'stood' your point? Oh yes you did, I sincerely hope. Millions wouldn't, though. I don't think the King would ever be 'sat' either, even on his throne!" I think that depends if I sat him on the throne | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""What would be your suggestion for an alternative Constitutional Head?" An elected President would be an obvious alternative. Or, as we like referendums so much, we could have a plebiscite like the Germans had in 1934. 89.93% majority for Nigel Farage? Oh I see, so we exchange a benign, hard working, loyal and transparent monarchy for a president. You mean like Putin, Xi or Kim Jong Un (elected themselves for life) or Berlusconi (corrupt) or Trump (mad and corrupt) or Biden (advanced dementia). No thanks, I'll stay with KCIII.you lost the argument when you said hardworking and loyal ffs I doubt you've got a clue what the Constitutional Head does. You should enlighten yourself. But it's fair to say he and the broader RF put in a shift that would shame most. And you doubt the monarch is loyal? FFS don't you realise the Police, Military, Judges, Politicians swear allegiance to the Crown? a shift pmsl driven by limo doors open for him pulls a cord makes a ten min spearhead eats dinner of the finest chef in the area sips finest wine the whisked away in limo back to his palace and you call that a shift it’s a day out for anyone else for ppl to say they put in a shift is embarrassing to the ppl that actually do " You sure this isn't a case of the green-eyed gremlins?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""What would be your suggestion for an alternative Constitutional Head?" An elected President would be an obvious alternative. Or, as we like referendums so much, we could have a plebiscite like the Germans had in 1934. 89.93% majority for Nigel Farage? Oh I see, so we exchange a benign, hard working, loyal and transparent monarchy for a president. You mean like Putin, Xi or Kim Jong Un (elected themselves for life) or Berlusconi (corrupt) or Trump (mad and corrupt) or Biden (advanced dementia). No thanks, I'll stay with KCIII.you lost the argument when you said hardworking and loyal ffs I doubt you've got a clue what the Constitutional Head does. You should enlighten yourself. But it's fair to say he and the broader RF put in a shift that would shame most. And you doubt the monarch is loyal? FFS don't you realise the Police, Military, Judges, Politicians swear allegiance to the Crown? a shift pmsl driven by limo doors open for him pulls a cord makes a ten min spearhead eats dinner of the finest chef in the area sips finest wine the whisked away in limo back to his palace and you call that a shift it’s a day out for anyone else for ppl to say they put in a shift is embarrassing to the ppl that actually do You sure this isn't a case of the green-eyed gremlins? "pls don’t call them gremlins have some respect ffs  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
