Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's not clear why you think that Brexit should have solved the British weather problems." I am pretty sure that I didn't say that however; that you suggest I did, sums up your own views pretty well. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Farmers’ confidence has hit its lowest level in at least 14 years, a long-running survey by the biggest farming union in Britain has found, with extreme weather and the post-Brexit phasing-out of EU subsidies blamed for the drop. The National Farmers’ Union warned there had been a “collapse of confidence” and that the outlook was at its lowest since the annual poll of its members in England and Wales began in 2010. Most farms are expecting to reduce food production next year, with arable farming particularly badly hit." Taken from the Guardian 6/5/24 The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed. Brexit was a long time ago and the government promised to replace EU subsidies with a better solution - did they (I don't know). Brexit (again) was a long time ago so why are we still seeing headlines like this? Surely farmers and the government should have got their act together by now - it's not as though leaving the EU was a surprise! " I have seen a few articles about farmers being hit by the wet weather which has badly affected their crops. I'm not sure what you refer to when you say farmers should have got their act together by now. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Farmers’ confidence has hit its lowest level in at least 14 years, a long-running survey by the biggest farming union in Britain has found, with extreme weather and the post-Brexit phasing-out of EU subsidies blamed for the drop. The National Farmers’ Union warned there had been a “collapse of confidence” and that the outlook was at its lowest since the annual poll of its members in England and Wales began in 2010. Most farms are expecting to reduce food production next year, with arable farming particularly badly hit." Taken from the Guardian 6/5/24 The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed. Brexit was a long time ago and the government promised to replace EU subsidies with a better solution - did they (I don't know). Brexit (again) was a long time ago so why are we still seeing headlines like this? Surely farmers and the government should have got their act together by now - it's not as though leaving the EU was a surprise! I have seen a few articles about farmers being hit by the wet weather which has badly affected their crops. I'm not sure what you refer to when you say farmers should have got their act together by now. " What I was referring to was the fact that the article mentioned that EU subsidies, or the lack of them, were impacting farmers. EU subsidies finished on 31st January, 2020 and both farmers and the government were well aware that this was going to happen - the majority of farmers actually voted to leave as far as I recall (but am not going to justify that statement in case anyone wants to disagree) - so surely both farmers and the government have had enough time to put other soluyions in place to ensure that farmers could continue (or were better off due to Brexit) as before. The article would suggest otherwise. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
""Farmers’ confidence has hit its lowest level in at least 14 years, a long-running survey by the biggest farming union in Britain has found, with extreme weather and the post-Brexit phasing-out of EU subsidies blamed for the drop. The National Farmers’ Union warned there had been a “collapse of confidence” and that the outlook was at its lowest since the annual poll of its members in England and Wales began in 2010. Most farms are expecting to reduce food production next year, with arable farming particularly badly hit." Taken from the Guardian 6/5/24 The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed. Brexit was a long time ago and the government promised to replace EU subsidies with a better solution - did they (I don't know). Brexit (again) was a long time ago so why are we still seeing headlines like this? Surely farmers and the government should have got their act together by now - it's not as though leaving the EU was a surprise! I have seen a few articles about farmers being hit by the wet weather which has badly affected their crops. I'm not sure what you refer to when you say farmers should have got their act together by now. What I was referring to was the fact that the article mentioned that EU subsidies, or the lack of them, were impacting farmers. EU subsidies finished on 31st January, 2020 and both farmers and the government were well aware that this was going to happen - the majority of farmers actually voted to leave as far as I recall (but am not going to justify that statement in case anyone wants to disagree) - so surely both farmers and the government have had enough time to put other soluyions in place to ensure that farmers could continue (or were better off due to Brexit) as before. The article would suggest otherwise. " Looking at the article it confirms that post brexit subsidies are in place and have been paid (as they quote figures and refer to figures from previous post brexit years). It mentions one particular area of the subsidies that are to do with sustainable farming which I think relates to taking care of nature on their farms instead of being paid simply to own land. It would appear that the government have changed the rules on this several times leaving farmers unsure what to do. There are other reports this year that say the allocation of Grant money was in line with what it would have been in the EU but was under spent as not all farmers applied. I have no experience of this and mainly looking at your article. I guess we all read things and take them slightly differently. To me much of the problem about subsidies is due to the government chopping and changing and yet another example of why they will loose come the GE. The remaining part of the problem is weather which is difficult to fix. As I say this is just my interpretation of what I have read and sure others are far more knowledgeable. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why can't UK farmers grow flowers?" They grow cauliflowers  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's not clear why you think that Brexit should have solved the British weather problems. I am pretty sure that I didn't say that ..." I'm pretty sure you did. First you quoted an article from the guardian, then you followed it with your own words - "The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed. Brexit was a long time ago ...". If you read the article that you quoted, it's mostly about wet weather. It even leads with a picture of a sodden field. "... however; that you suggest I did, sums up your own views pretty well." I'd be interested to hear what you think my views are. It would seem the that fact that you think you made a point about Brexit tells us rather more about you than it does about me. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another thread, we must import 80% of cut flowers. Why can't UK farmers grow flowers?" Infrastructure costs I would imagine, huge outlay. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another thread, we must import 80% of cut flowers. Why can't UK farmers grow flowers? Infrastructure costs I would imagine, huge outlay." Yes, I agree, and that's my point. If we had joined-up-thinking between government, producers and trade organisations there would be investment in infrastructure for long term gain. But we have government of short termism and fire-fighting. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another thread, we must import 80% of cut flowers. Why can't UK farmers grow flowers? Infrastructure costs I would imagine, huge outlay. Yes, I agree, and that's my point. If we had joined-up-thinking between government, producers and trade organisations there would be investment in infrastructure for long term gain. But we have government of short termism and fire-fighting." We have a government passing legislation on gender neutral toilets but ignoring huge issue like climate change, the economy and dare I say it, illegal immigration. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's not clear why you think that Brexit should have solved the British weather problems. I am pretty sure that I didn't say that ... I'm pretty sure you did. First you quoted an article from the guardian, then you followed it with your own words - "The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed. Brexit was a long time ago ...". If you read the article that you quoted, it's mostly about wet weather. It even leads with a picture of a sodden field. ... however; that you suggest I did, sums up your own views pretty well. I'd be interested to hear what you think my views are. It would seem the that fact that you think you made a point about Brexit tells us rather more about you than it does about me." Perhaps it would be more honest of you to not run two paragraphs together as if they were one. Or perhaps that was your whole purpose - to skew what I was saying to suit your own agenda. In future, if you are going to quote what I write, try to quote correctly rather than pretend to be clever. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's not clear why you think that Brexit should have solved the British weather problems. I am pretty sure that I didn't say that ... I'm pretty sure you did. First you quoted an article from the guardian, then you followed it with your own words - "The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed. Brexit was a long time ago ...". If you read the article that you quoted, it's mostly about wet weather. It even leads with a picture of a sodden field. ... however; that you suggest I did, sums up your own views pretty well. I'd be interested to hear what you think my views are. It would seem the that fact that you think you made a point about Brexit tells us rather more about you than it does about me. Perhaps it would be more honest of you to not run two paragraphs together as if they were one. Or perhaps that was your whole purpose - to skew what I was saying to suit your own agenda. In future, if you are going to quote what I write, try to quote correctly rather than pretend to be clever." He broke up your one sentence to address the points separately. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, the fact it has got your back up so much definitely tells us some things about you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's not clear why you think that Brexit should have solved the British weather problems. I am pretty sure that I didn't say that ... I'm pretty sure you did. First you quoted an article from the guardian, then you followed it with your own words - "The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed. Brexit was a long time ago ...". If you read the article that you quoted, it's mostly about wet weather. It even leads with a picture of a sodden field. ... however; that you suggest I did, sums up your own views pretty well. I'd be interested to hear what you think my views are. It would seem the that fact that you think you made a point about Brexit tells us rather more about you than it does about me. Perhaps it would be more honest of you to not run two paragraphs together as if they were one. Or perhaps that was your whole purpose - to skew what I was saying to suit your own agenda. In future, if you are going to quote what I write, try to quote correctly rather than pretend to be clever. He broke up your one sentence to address the points separately. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, the fact it has got your back up so much definitely tells us some things about you. " He ran two paragraphs together rather than broke up two sentences. Read the original post and look at how he ran all of paragraph one and the start of paragraph two together t makr a point which was based on his manipulation of my words. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's not clear why you think that Brexit should have solved the British weather problems. I am pretty sure that I didn't say that ... I'm pretty sure you did. First you quoted an article from the guardian, then you followed it with your own words - "The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed. Brexit was a long time ago ...". If you read the article that you quoted, it's mostly about wet weather. It even leads with a picture of a sodden field. ... however; that you suggest I did, sums up your own views pretty well. I'd be interested to hear what you think my views are. It would seem the that fact that you think you made a point about Brexit tells us rather more about you than it does about me. Perhaps it would be more honest of you to not run two paragraphs together as if they were one. Or perhaps that was your whole purpose - to skew what I was saying to suit your own agenda. In future, if you are going to quote what I write, try to quote correctly rather than pretend to be clever. He broke up your one sentence to address the points separately. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, the fact it has got your back up so much definitely tells us some things about you. He ran two paragraphs together rather than broke up two sentences. Read the original post and look at how he ran all of paragraph one and the start of paragraph two together t makr a point which was based on his manipulation of my words." I was trying to be concise, but I can see why you thought it was disingenuous. So I'll do it the long way. You quoted a Guardian article headlined "Farmer confidence at lowest in England and Wales since survey began, NFU says". Immediately after that quote, you said "The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed". Since the Guardian article is mostly about the weather, your words read as though you believe that the weather is mostly to blame for farmers' issues. Then you said "Brexit was a long time ago and the government promised to replace EU subsidies with a better solution - did they (I don't know)". This reads as though you think that subsidies are a minor issue, since you admit that you don't know whether they are being paid or not. Clearly you don't feel the issue important enough to read up on. Then you said "Brexit (again) was a long time ago so why are we still seeing headlines like this?". Since the Guardian article was about farmers' difficulties with the weather, and your own words suggested that you thought the weather was the dominant problem, it looked like you were asking why Brexit hadn't solved the weather problems. If you meant to post about how terrible Brexit is, you shouldn't have chosen an article that only mentions it in passing, you shouldn't have given the impression that weather was the biggest problem farmers have, and you should have looked into subsidies to see if they were getting paid or not. Do you still think that you can 'sum up my own views' from this, much longer, post? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's not clear why you think that Brexit should have solved the British weather problems. I am pretty sure that I didn't say that ... I'm pretty sure you did. First you quoted an article from the guardian, then you followed it with your own words - "The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed. Brexit was a long time ago ...". If you read the article that you quoted, it's mostly about wet weather. It even leads with a picture of a sodden field. ... however; that you suggest I did, sums up your own views pretty well. I'd be interested to hear what you think my views are. It would seem the that fact that you think you made a point about Brexit tells us rather more about you than it does about me. Perhaps it would be more honest of you to not run two paragraphs together as if they were one. Or perhaps that was your whole purpose - to skew what I was saying to suit your own agenda. In future, if you are going to quote what I write, try to quote correctly rather than pretend to be clever. He broke up your one sentence to address the points separately. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, the fact it has got your back up so much definitely tells us some things about you. He ran two paragraphs together rather than broke up two sentences. Read the original post and look at how he ran all of paragraph one and the start of paragraph two together t makr a point which was based on his manipulation of my words." I see why you're pissed. He quoted something you said. One thing directly after the other | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's not clear why you think that Brexit should have solved the British weather problems. I am pretty sure that I didn't say that ... I'm pretty sure you did. First you quoted an article from the guardian, then you followed it with your own words - "The weather has been a major factor in this with fields flooded and crops destroyed. Brexit was a long time ago ...". If you read the article that you quoted, it's mostly about wet weather. It even leads with a picture of a sodden field. ... however; that you suggest I did, sums up your own views pretty well. I'd be interested to hear what you think my views are. It would seem the that fact that you think you made a point about Brexit tells us rather more about you than it does about me. Perhaps it would be more honest of you to not run two paragraphs together as if they were one. Or perhaps that was your whole purpose - to skew what I was saying to suit your own agenda. In future, if you are going to quote what I write, try to quote correctly rather than pretend to be clever. He broke up your one sentence to address the points separately. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, the fact it has got your back up so much definitely tells us some things about you. He ran two paragraphs together rather than broke up two sentences. Read the original post and look at how he ran all of paragraph one and the start of paragraph two together t makr a point which was based on his manipulation of my words. I see why you're pissed. He quoted something you said. One thing directly after the other "Oh how very clever | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another thread, we must import 80% of cut flowers. Why can't UK farmers grow flowers? Infrastructure costs I would imagine, huge outlay." Weather Weather Weather | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another thread, we must import 80% of cut flowers. Why can't UK farmers grow flowers?" You can’t eat daffodils Longer wetter winters, and hotter summers - cost of water to save perishing crops, unpredictability of weather conditions and fear of crop failure. This is not good news, coupled with cheaper food imports, and higher EU tariffs on exports. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another thread, we must import 80% of cut flowers. Why can't UK farmers grow flowers? Infrastructure costs I would imagine, huge outlay. Weather Weather Weather " The weather plays no part in industrial supplies of flowers, peppers, tomatoes etc. All in doors, climate controlled and state of the art watering feeding and lighting. A traditional farmer in the UK can’t compete. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another thread, we must import 80% of cut flowers. Why can't UK farmers grow flowers? Infrastructure costs I would imagine, huge outlay. Weather Weather Weather The weather plays no part in industrial supplies of flowers, peppers, tomatoes etc. All in doors, climate controlled and state of the art watering feeding and lighting. A traditional farmer in the UK can’t compete. " And can’t get planning for acres if glasshouses to grow in | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another thread, we must import 80% of cut flowers. Why can't UK farmers grow flowers? Infrastructure costs I would imagine, huge outlay. Weather Weather Weather The weather plays no part in industrial supplies of flowers, peppers, tomatoes etc. All in doors, climate controlled and state of the art watering feeding and lighting. A traditional farmer in the UK can’t compete. And can’t get planning for acres if glasshouses to grow in " I'm not sure about the planning permissions, but to get the UK self sufficient it would cost a lot of money to setup and the British public are not necessarily a market most would invest in, when it comes to fresh food purchasing and cost expectations. The UK supermarkets could also be a blocker in purchasing, so the why would a farmer bother at all? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another thread, we must import 80% of cut flowers. Why can't UK farmers grow flowers? Infrastructure costs I would imagine, huge outlay. Weather Weather Weather The weather plays no part in industrial supplies of flowers, peppers, tomatoes etc. All in doors, climate controlled and state of the art watering feeding and lighting. A traditional farmer in the UK can’t compete. And can’t get planning for acres if glasshouses to grow in I'm not sure about the planning permissions, but to get the UK self sufficient it would cost a lot of money to setup and the British public are not necessarily a market most would invest in, when it comes to fresh food purchasing and cost expectations. The UK supermarkets could also be a blocker in purchasing, so the why would a farmer bother at all?" Interesting article in the guardian yesterday written by Guy Watson of Riverford organic growers, well known down here. Echos what you have said Riverford HMRC returns show turnover £99.5 million on companies house, with £2.6 million pre tax / £2 million post tax profit. 2% margin, selling higher end priced organic veg Scale that down to a smaller operation that was supported by EU subsidies and it is no longer making a profit. 7000 uk farms closed in last three years. Add the weather, imports. invasive ploughing of land, little adoption of no till / hydroponic/ permaculture techniques etc There are some interesting videos on you tube of Israeli agriculture techniques and a lot to be learned | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"From another thread, we must import 80% of cut flowers. Why can't UK farmers grow flowers? Infrastructure costs I would imagine, huge outlay. Weather Weather Weather The weather plays no part in industrial supplies of flowers, peppers, tomatoes etc. All in doors, climate controlled and state of the art watering feeding and lighting. A traditional farmer in the UK can’t compete. And can’t get planning for acres if glasshouses to grow in I'm not sure about the planning permissions, but to get the UK self sufficient it would cost a lot of money to setup and the British public are not necessarily a market most would invest in, when it comes to fresh food purchasing and cost expectations. The UK supermarkets could also be a blocker in purchasing, so the why would a farmer bother at all? Interesting article in the guardian yesterday written by Guy Watson of Riverford organic growers, well known down here. Echos what you have said Riverford HMRC returns show turnover £99.5 million on companies house, with £2.6 million pre tax / £2 million post tax profit. 2% margin, selling higher end priced organic veg Scale that down to a smaller operation that was supported by EU subsidies and it is no longer making a profit. 7000 uk farms closed in last three years. Add the weather, imports. invasive ploughing of land, little adoption of no till / hydroponic/ permaculture techniques etc There are some interesting videos on you tube of Israeli agriculture techniques and a lot to be learned " It is unfortunately the nature of our demand in the UK and elsewhere for that matter. Public demand for low cost food items, fresh or mass produced has produced some unique farming outputs as you mention. The UK seems a long way behind the curve. However, with the ever increasing uncertainty on crop production, city investment could pay off if they could take some control of supermarket demands. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
