FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Rwanda can’t guarantee how many people it will take in from UK

Jump to newest
 

By *0shadesOfFilth OP   Man
20 weeks ago

nearby

Sunaks scheme in more trouble as Rwandan government refused to give assurances that the 52,000 eligible asylum seekers will be accepted, saying it would be ‘thousands’

That £400 million scheme not looking such a good idea now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
20 weeks ago

Bournemouth

I thought they would only take 200?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loscouplegl3Couple
20 weeks ago

Gloucester

“Not looking such a great idea now”

It’s never looked like a great idea. Monumental stupidity of the highest order!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostindreamsMan
20 weeks ago

London

I don't think anyone said they will take all 52,000 to begin with. And thousands is a huge range, with it's minima much bigger the 200 the left wing fake news outlets were peddling out

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
20 weeks ago

golden fields


"“Not looking such a great idea now”

It’s never looked like a great idea. Monumental stupidity of the highest order!"

In fairness, it's worked a treat though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
20 weeks ago

in Lancashire

Complete bag of bollocks from the start but it's working in terms of deflection..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loscouplegl3Couple
20 weeks ago

Gloucester


"I don't think anyone said they will take all 52,000 to begin with. And thousands is a huge range, with it's minima much bigger the 200 the left wing fake news outlets were peddling out"

“Left wing fake new outlets”

Ha ha ha ha!!! Delusional Trumpism at its finest! Now tell us the one about how nationalism will save the country

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *loscouplegl3Couple
20 weeks ago

Gloucester


"“Not looking such a great idea now”

It’s never looked like a great idea. Monumental stupidity of the highest order!

In fairness, it's worked a treat though. "

At wasting vast quantities of money that the government is short of?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
20 weeks ago

golden fields


"“Not looking such a great idea now”

It’s never looked like a great idea. Monumental stupidity of the highest order!

In fairness, it's worked a treat though.

At wasting vast quantities of money that the government is short of?"

The government don't care about wasting a couple of hundred million, it's peanuts compared to what they gave their mates for faulty PPE. Besides, investing public money to try to win back voters who defected to even more right wing and hateful political parties isn't something they'd worry about.

And it is working, just look at how many people on here have a massive boner for anything anti-immigrant.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
20 weeks ago

Terra Firma

Controlled immigration

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
20 weeks ago

The issue with the 200 (which is miss interpreting what's been said) is the government have no control of the narrative.

The best we have of a HMG view is the note between Boris and Sunak on budgets.

It's tumble. And the media loves vacuum.

I'd hope that there is some minimum given the money being sent. My suspicion is no. We were going to do this off the back of a MoU.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
20 weeks ago

Central

It's just been standard immoral posturing, not bothered about the huge cost from public money. And the even more immoral legislation, deriding the legal system checks and balances, to truly having people kept safely, shows their moral bankruptcy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orses and PoniesMan
20 weeks ago

Ealing

It looks like the scheme is already working . A significant number of people have already crossed the border to the Republic of Ireland.

Ww need to invest a lot more money and track down anyone who is staying in the country illegally.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
20 weeks ago

golden fields


"It looks like the scheme is already working .

"


"

A significant number of people have already crossed the border to the Republic of Ireland.

"


"

Ww need to invest a lot more money and track down anyone who is staying in the country illegally. "

That's right, we need to spunk away millions more to make sure we get more fringe elements of the electorate back in line at the ballot boxes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ustaboutSaneMan
20 weeks ago

My World


"The issue with the 200 (which is miss interpreting what's been said) is the government have no control of the narrative.

The best we have of a HMG view is the note between Boris and Sunak on budgets.

It's tumble. And the media loves vacuum.

I'd hope that there is some minimum given the money being sent. My suspicion is no. We were going to do this off the back of a MoU. "

I'd go as far as saying most on here (politics forum) is misinterpreted for various reasons. Some do it deliberately out of ignorance, laziness or click bait, some because it suits their narrative.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top