Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Politics |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world" The end of civilisation, the history books explain how it happens and why. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world" Apart from biological anomalies, only women do have periods (menses). If some one who was born female identifies as male and doesn't seek to change the byproducts of being female, they shouldn't be upset if called a woman. Same with pregnancy. A uterus is synonymous with being female. I'd still respect them to call them by their chosen pronoun, but I might blurt out a question or two. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world" Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field " I disagree, I'm a woman, I have feminine biology, which makes me a woman. Guys can be feminine but cannot be a woman. Mrs x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field " That feels like very much a semantics argument. For the vast majority of people woman = female | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field That feels like very much a semantics argument. For the vast majority of people woman = female" You are correct it is a semantic argument, that is how the rules have been changed. Society has has failed to address the semantics and here we are. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field That feels like very much a semantics argument. For the vast majority of people woman = female" A girl = a female child, a woman = an adult female | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field That feels like very much a semantics argument. For the vast majority of people woman = female A girl = a female child, a woman = an adult female" Therefore we can't have man = woman, can we? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field That feels like very much a semantics argument. For the vast majority of people woman = female A girl = a female child, a woman = an adult female Therefore we can't have man = woman, can we?" No but a man can become a transwoman | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But ask someone to define what a woman is and you're a far right extremist You lot better toe the line Trans women ARE woman and if they say they're having a period you better not question it you Nazis Just remember, 2+2 is 5 Winston " A transwoman can bleed but cannot menstruate | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A woman is a woman A female is a female A transwoman is a transwoman" The lawyer shouldn’t have anything to worry about then? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field That feels like very much a semantics argument. For the vast majority of people woman = female A girl = a female child, a woman = an adult female" so girls can't have periods? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world The end of civilisation, the history books explain how it happens and why. " What history books? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field That feels like very much a semantics argument. For the vast majority of people woman = female A girl = a female child, a woman = an adult female" "so girls can't have periods?" That's a very dangerous road to go down. It might lead to people suggesting that anyone that does have periods must be a woman, and therefore not a child, even though they are only 13. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field That feels like very much a semantics argument. For the vast majority of people woman = female A girl = a female child, a woman = an adult female so girls can't have periods? That's a very dangerous road to go down. It might lead to people suggesting that anyone that does have periods must be a woman, and therefore not a child, even though they are only 13." you saw my not so subtle trap. (Trap, not defence m'laud) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world The end of civilisation, the history books explain how it happens and why. What history books?" Usually you have to look for yourself, erm, the Grecian, roman, Mongolian, aztec, maya, inca, that should keep you busy. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world The end of civilisation, the history books explain how it happens and why. What history books? Usually you have to look for yourself, erm, the Grecian, roman, Mongolian, aztec, maya, inca, that should keep you busy. " Just search the end of the 'insert' civilisation. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So going back to the original bit, she can be sued as she incorrectly stated only woman can have periods when in fact girls can too." You can't be sued for being incorrect (or at least, such a case would be doomed to failure). But the lawyer in the original post is being sued for creating a hostile atmosphere by chairing a gender-critical group. This case is also doomed to failure, as the courts have already ruled that a gender-critical view is a protected belief. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So going back to the original bit, she can be sued as she incorrectly stated only woman can have periods when in fact girls can too. You can't be sued for being incorrect (or at least, such a case would be doomed to failure). But the lawyer in the original post is being sued for creating a hostile atmosphere by chairing a gender-critical group. This case is also doomed to failure, as the courts have already ruled that a gender-critical view is a protected belief." It was meant to be funny lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"After saying only women have periods ! Can't read the entire article as it's behind a paywall in the Times and I have no intention of paying to read what is probably sensationalist bullshit but makes you wonder, can men or people who identify as whatever have periods if they weren't originally women. Wtf is happening in the screwed up world Identifying as a woman does not make a person a female. The nuance is woman and female in these arguments, refer to female and it levels the field That feels like very much a semantics argument. For the vast majority of people woman = female A girl = a female child, a woman = an adult female so girls can't have periods?" Who said they cannot? I was a child when I began menstruating. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |