Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They get a shit deal don't they? More chance of being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically.. Getting their drinks spiked And now have their gender under attack from men bring placed in women's prisons and go on to r@pe inmates.. And in sports, risk of being out performed by transgender women. " We all get a shit deal | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They get a shit deal don't they? More chance of being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically.. Getting their drinks spiked And now have their gender under attack from men bring placed in women's prisons and go on to r@pe inmates.. And in sports, risk of being out performed by transgender women. " Feminism got outa steam, it's objective of destroying relationships and family was a major success. Now move on to the next thing. Destroy childhood and innocence | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They get a shit deal don't they? More chance of being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically.. Getting their drinks spiked And now have their gender under attack from men bring placed in women's prisons and go on to r@pe inmates.. And in sports, risk of being out performed by transgender women. Feminism got outa steam, it's objective of destroying relationships and family was a major success. Now move on to the next thing. Destroy childhood and innocence " What is feminism? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They get a shit deal don't they? More chance of being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically.. Getting their drinks spiked And now have their gender under attack from men bring placed in women's prisons and go on to r@pe inmates.. And in sports, risk of being out performed by transgender women. " Women  with dicks aren't allowed in prisons for women.
"Transgender women offenders no longer housed in women’s prisons if they have male genitalia or have committed sex crimes.
new approach extended to include those who have committed violent crimes."
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They get a shit deal don't they? More chance of being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically.. Getting their drinks spiked And now have their gender under attack from men bring placed in women's prisons and go on to r@pe inmates.. And in sports, risk of being out performed by transgender women. Women with dicks aren't allowed in prisons for women.
"Transgender women offenders no longer housed in women’s prisons if they have male genitalia or have committed sex crimes.
new approach extended to include those who have committed violent crimes."
"What if that dickless yesterday-man-today-woman took advantage of himer superior phisic and used himer fist? It hurst more than a dick | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They get a shit deal don't they? More chance of being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically.. Getting their drinks spiked And now have their gender under attack from men bring placed in women's prisons and go on to r@pe inmates.. And in sports, risk of being out performed by transgender women. Women with dicks aren't allowed in prisons for women.
"Transgender women offenders no longer housed in women’s prisons if they have male genitalia or have committed sex crimes.
new approach extended to include those who have committed violent crimes."
What if that dickless yesterday-man-today-woman took advantage of himer superior phisic and used himer fist? It hurst more than a dick"WTF? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They get a shit deal don't they? More chance of being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically.. Getting their drinks spiked And now have their gender under attack from men bring placed in women's prisons and go on to r@pe inmates.. And in sports, risk of being out performed by transgender women. Women with dicks aren't allowed in prisons for women.
"Transgender women offenders no longer housed in women’s prisons if they have male genitalia or have committed sex crimes.
new approach extended to include those who have committed violent crimes."
What if that dickless yesterday-man-today-woman took advantage of himer superior phisic and used himer fist? It hurst more than a dick
WTF?"You sound shocked. It's a logical question. Fisting is a popular choice on the interest list of many swingers and non swingers. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They get a shit deal don't they? More chance of being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically.. Getting their drinks spiked And now have their gender under attack from men bring placed in women's prisons and go on to r@pe inmates.. And in sports, risk of being out performed by transgender women. Women with dicks aren't allowed in prisons for women.
"Transgender women offenders no longer housed in women’s prisons if they have male genitalia or have committed sex crimes.
new approach extended to include those who have committed violent crimes."
What if that dickless yesterday-man-today-woman took advantage of himer superior phisic and used himer fist? It hurst more than a dick
WTF?
You sound shocked. It's a logical question. Fisting is a popular choice on the interest list of many swingers and non swingers. "It'd be good to read what it states  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They get a shit deal don't they? More chance of being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically.. Getting their drinks spiked And now have their gender under attack from men bring placed in women's prisons and go on to r@pe inmates.. And in sports, risk of being out performed by transgender women. Women with dicks aren't allowed in prisons for women.
"Transgender women offenders no longer housed in women’s prisons if they have male genitalia or have committed sex crimes.
new approach extended to include those who have committed violent crimes."
What if that dickless yesterday-man-today-woman took advantage of himer superior phisic and used himer fist? It hurst more than a dick
WTF?"You red my mind.. WTF | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? " My question remains unanswered… | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered…" Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. " I asked it of one person though  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though "One simplified googled definition amongst many: "the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.""That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much. "I disagree with it wholesale | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale"Not everything that looks good, is safe to to consume. Best way to know is observe what happened to the oeople who consumed it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
Not everything that looks good, is safe to to consume.
Best way to know is observe what happened to the oeople who consumed it"Do you not approve of "the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."? What is it specifically that concerns you? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale"That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale. Some might say it was backwards. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards."Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff "That's why they made breaks and reverse gear in the car. It could sve your life. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff "What aspects of equality do you agree with? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with? "Everything. The whole statement is full of holes and flaws. You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes" If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down. You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn. "Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job? "Jobs should be given to the most qualified. Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us. The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design." Design? You think that men and women were designed? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job?
Jobs should be given to the most qualified.
Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us.
The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist"So their most important job is as a mother and feminine being? What if they don’t want to be a mother and/or feminine? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job?
Jobs should be given to the most qualified.
Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us.
The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist"You also didn’t mention voting, which I mentioned. Please confirm that women should have the same voting rights as men. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job?
Jobs should be given to the most qualified.
Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us.
The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist
So their most important job is as a mother and feminine being?
What if they don’t want to be a mother and/or feminine? "The only reason women would not want to be a mother is through indoctrination against it. Every code in their DNA, every natural instinct in them drives them to want it. Until you install a virus in their mindset that tells them otherwise. And now ee're doomed. We've just collectively too busy geting d*unk (metaphorically) and having fun and singing while the titanic is sinking. Keep going forward no matter what | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The only reason women would not want to be a mother is through indoctrination against it. Every code in their DNA, every natural instinct in them drives them to want it. Until you install a virus in their mindset that tells them otherwise. " Wow. Impressively bold. And stupid. But bold, for sure. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job?
Jobs should be given to the most qualified.
Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us.
The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist
So their most important job is as a mother and feminine being?
What if they don’t want to be a mother and/or feminine? "What if men don't want to build houses anymore, or trains, or planes, or roads, or be sewage men or bin men, or die for the country when an invasion is on the way, or build bridges, or they decide to not do plumbing, policing fire fighting, or buil | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"They get a shit deal don't they? More chance of being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically.. Getting their drinks spiked And now have their gender under attack from men bring placed in women's prisons and go on to r@pe inmates.. And in sports, risk of being out performed by transgender women. Women with dicks aren't allowed in prisons for women.
"Transgender women offenders no longer housed in women’s prisons if they have male genitalia or have committed sex crimes.
new approach extended to include those who have committed violent crimes."
"That's not the case in Scotland. "The SPS's new "individualised" policy will see transgender women initially placed in the male estate until sufficient information is known on whether they can be admitted in accordance with their chosen gender." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job?
Jobs should be given to the most qualified.
Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us.
The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist
So their most important job is as a mother and feminine being?
What if they don’t want to be a mother and/or feminine?
What if men don't want to build houses anymore, or trains, or planes, or roads, or be sewage men or bin men, or die for the country when an invasion is on the way, or build bridges, or they decide to not do plumbing, policing fire fighting, or buil"What if a similar movement of Masculism breaks out and they request equal rights for men on the basis of the equality of the sexes? And as soon as they go to school they're indoctrinated to believe they're oppressed doing all the heavy lifting, dirty and risky jobs? And they decide to do only women dominated jobs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job?
Jobs should be given to the most qualified.
Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us.
The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist
So their most important job is as a mother and feminine being?
What if they don’t want to be a mother and/or feminine?
What if men don't want to build houses anymore, or trains, or planes, or roads, or be sewage men or bin men, or die for the country when an invasion is on the way, or build bridges, or they decide to not do plumbing, policing fire fighting, or buil"Are those jobs exclusive to men, then? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job?
Jobs should be given to the most qualified.
Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us.
The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist
So their most important job is as a mother and feminine being?
What if they don’t want to be a mother and/or feminine?
What if men don't want to build houses anymore, or trains, or planes, or roads, or be sewage men or bin men, or die for the country when an invasion is on the way, or build bridges, or they decide to not do plumbing, policing fire fighting, or buil
Are those jobs exclusive to men, then?
"Over 90% men. Let's talk equality. What men pay as taxes go to men and what women pay in taxes go to women. Try that equality. Try recruiting according to the same standards of qualifications not on the basis of sexes share politics impose on sectors. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job?
Jobs should be given to the most qualified.
Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us.
The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist
So their most important job is as a mother and feminine being?
What if they don’t want to be a mother and/or feminine?
What if men don't want to build houses anymore, or trains, or planes, or roads, or be sewage men or bin men, or die for the country when an invasion is on the way, or build bridges, or they decide to not do plumbing, policing fire fighting, or buil
Are those jobs exclusive to men, then?
Over 90% men.
Let's talk equality. What men pay as taxes go to men and what women pay in taxes go to women. Try that equality.
Try recruiting according to the same standards of qualifications not on the basis of sexes share politics impose on sectors.
"So since you agree that they’re not exclusive to men, you’re accepting that women can do them. And since you accept that women *can* do them, why shouldn’t women do them? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What hardcore anti-feminist men need to accept is that the average everyday woman is infinitely more powerful than them. " How many times a day do you worship them before they throw you a bone or a worn knicker?  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What hardcore anti-feminist men need to accept is that the average everyday woman is infinitely more powerful than them. How many times a day do you worship them before they throw you a bone or a worn knicker? "They’re more powerful than you because with one flash of cleavage, a wink and a smile, you’d be throwing money at them, and pandering to their every whim, and still believing you’re in charge  | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What hardcore anti-feminist men need to accept is that the average everyday woman is infinitely more powerful than them. How many times a day do you worship them before they throw you a bone or a worn knicker? "You still haven’t told me a couple of things - should women have the same voting rights as men? And since you’ve accepted that women can do men’s jobs, why shouldn’t they do so? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job?
Jobs should be given to the most qualified.
Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us.
The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist
So their most important job is as a mother and feminine being?
What if they don’t want to be a mother and/or feminine?
What if men don't want to build houses anymore, or trains, or planes, or roads, or be sewage men or bin men, or die for the country when an invasion is on the way, or build bridges, or they decide to not do plumbing, policing fire fighting, or buil
Are those jobs exclusive to men, then?
Over 90% men.
Let's talk equality. What men pay as taxes go to men and what women pay in taxes go to women. Try that equality.
Try recruiting according to the same standards of qualifications not on the basis of sexes share politics impose on sectors.
So since you agree that they’re not exclusive to men, you’re accepting that women can do them.
And since you accept that women *can* do them, why shouldn’t women do them? "I'd like to see 50/50 on those jobs! And have just as many sewage women and bin women. And equal rights to housing and benefits | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
That’s a blunt statement - to disagree with equality of the sexes, wholesale.
Some might say it was backwards.
Sometimes backward is not such a bad idea if you're falling down a cliff
What aspects of equality do you agree with?
Everything.
The whole statement is full of holes and flaws.
You're defining women's rights on the basis of what? "The equality of the sexes"
If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design.
So the foundation of it all is built on sand and the whole building you construct on top of it will crush down.
You can write a sofisticated software that runs the computer from a pair of a numbers: (0;1). The moment you consider 0=1, your computer will burn.
Should women have the same right to education as men? The same right to vote? Be considered totally equal for an office based job?
Jobs should be given to the most qualified.
Women have the right to education but without indoctrinating them that their most important job as a mother of the next generation, as a wife as a feminnine being is inferior and is oppressive to her and without destroying the building block of the society to the point we have reached now with almost an infertile society that can't survive without relying on foreign nations to produce our next generation for us.
The moment those nations cut loose and our financial disparity becomes insignificant, this entire country will fall and cease to exist
So their most important job is as a mother and feminine being?
What if they don’t want to be a mother and/or feminine?
What if men don't want to build houses anymore, or trains, or planes, or roads, or be sewage men or bin men, or die for the country when an invasion is on the way, or build bridges, or they decide to not do plumbing, policing fire fighting, or buil
Are those jobs exclusive to men, then?
Over 90% men.
Let's talk equality. What men pay as taxes go to men and what women pay in taxes go to women. Try that equality.
Try recruiting according to the same standards of qualifications not on the basis of sexes share politics impose on sectors.
So since you agree that they’re not exclusive to men, you’re accepting that women can do them.
And since you accept that women *can* do them, why shouldn’t women do them?
I'd like to see 50/50 on those jobs! And have just as many sewage women and bin women. And equal rights to housing and benefits "But that’s contrary to what you said earlier - “ What if men don't want to build houses anymore, or trains, or planes, or roads, or be sewage men or bin men, or die for the country when an invasion is on the way, or build bridges, or they decide to not do plumbing, policing fire fighting” Implying that somehow the world would stop if men didn’t do these manly jobs. But then you accept that women can do them to. Can you see how you’ve gone wrong, here? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale"Fair play. Lots of people who have these kind of caveman attitudes skirt around and try to pretend it's fine. But you're front and centre. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
Fair play. Lots of people who have these kind of caveman attitudes skirt around and try to pretend it's fine. But you're front and centre. "I’m convinced it’s a bizarre parody character. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What hardcore anti-feminist men need to accept is that the average everyday woman is infinitely more powerful than them. How many times a day do you worship them before they throw you a bone or a worn knicker?
They’re more powerful than you because with one flash of cleavage, a wink and a smile, you’d be throwing money at them, and pandering to their every whim, and still believing you’re in charge "So after all that preaching about the intellectual and professional worth of women, you ended up resuming their value to the hole they have between their leg and projecting your weakness on me. It's not me who is bowing down to worship them for a charity sex. You are. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"What hardcore anti-feminist men need to accept is that the average everyday woman is infinitely more powerful than them. How many times a day do you worship them before they throw you a bone or a worn knicker?
They’re more powerful than you because with one flash of cleavage, a wink and a smile, you’d be throwing money at them, and pandering to their every whim, and still believing you’re in charge
So after all that preaching about the intellectual and professional worth of women, you ended up resuming their value to the hole they have between their leg and projecting your weakness on me.
It's not me who is bowing down to worship them for a charity sex. You are. "No, I’m pointing out that your disrespectful facade is a sham. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
Fair play. Lots of people who have these kind of caveman attitudes skirt around and try to pretend it's fine. But you're front and centre. "I promise you if a cave man were brought back by a time machine, most women on fab will be lined up to taste some extinct masculinity | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
Fair play. Lots of people who have these kind of caveman attitudes skirt around and try to pretend it's fine. But you're front and centre.
I promise you if a cave man were brought back by a time machine, most women on fab will be lined up to taste some extinct masculinity "Should women have the same voting rights as men? You’ve not responded yet. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Rather than being comprehensive on for example. Careers, lifestyles etc.. I was thinking of the more fundamental safeguards.. Physically, women arnt as strong as men. And therefore more likely to be physically harmed .. E.g being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically assaulted, stalked Getting their drinks spiked, murdered.. And in sports, risk of being out performed and pushed aside by transgender women. That's what I was pondering. As for job roles yes. Women are generally less suited for physically demanding roles except for some exceptions.. The best person for the job should apply... Personally I have seen some women take on car mechanic job roles and not being adept in that role, but there's one woman who's bloody good at the job. " I agree. I've seen women who are better than some men in physically demanding jobs. However they're the exception. But it takes a toll on them metally and physically in the long run. Being a financial sclave to the corporate is the greatest achievement sold to women by feminism | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
Fair play. Lots of people who have these kind of caveman attitudes skirt around and try to pretend it's fine. But you're front and centre.
I promise you if a cave man were brought back by a time machine, most women on fab will be lined up to taste some extinct masculinity "Do you follow a religion that allows drinking? Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Rather than being comprehensive on for example. Careers, lifestyles etc.. I was thinking of the more fundamental safeguards.. Physically, women arnt as strong as men. And therefore more likely to be physically harmed .. E.g being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically assaulted, stalked Getting their drinks spiked, murdered.. And in sports, risk of being out performed and pushed aside by transgender women. That's what I was pondering. As for job roles yes. Women are generally less suited for physically demanding roles except for some exceptions.. The best person for the job should apply... Personally I have seen some women take on car mechanic job roles and not being adept in that role, but there's one woman who's bloody good at the job. I agree. I've seen women who are better than some men in physically demanding jobs. However they're the exception. But it takes a toll on them metally and physically in the long run. Being a financial sclave to the corporate is the greatest achievement sold to women by feminism" Should women not be allowed to freely choose their role in society? And men too, for that matter? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
Fair play. Lots of people who have these kind of caveman attitudes skirt around and try to pretend it's fine. But you're front and centre.
I promise you if a cave man were brought back by a time machine, most women on fab will be lined up to taste some extinct masculinity Do you follow a religion that allows drinking?
Mrs x"No | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
Fair play. Lots of people who have these kind of caveman attitudes skirt around and try to pretend it's fine. But you're front and centre.
I promise you if a cave man were brought back by a time machine, most women on fab will be lined up to taste some extinct masculinity Do you follow a religion that allows drinking?
Mrs x
No"Your posts seem to be heavily influenced by something. At first I thought it was drink, Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
Fair play. Lots of people who have these kind of caveman attitudes skirt around and try to pretend it's fine. But you're front and centre.
I promise you if a cave man were brought back by a time machine, most women on fab will be lined up to taste some extinct masculinity Do you follow a religion that allows drinking?
Mrs x
No
Your posts seem to be heavily influenced by something. At first I thought it was drink,
Mrs x"Lol, I might be too sober for your liking x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale
Fair play. Lots of people who have these kind of caveman attitudes skirt around and try to pretend it's fine. But you're front and centre.
I promise you if a cave man were brought back by a time machine, most women on fab will be lined up to taste some extinct masculinity Do you follow a religion that allows drinking?
Mrs x
No
Your posts seem to be heavily influenced by something. At first I thought it was drink,
Mrs x"But know I think it's something else, Mrs x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Rather than being comprehensive on for example. Careers, lifestyles etc.. I was thinking of the more fundamental safeguards.. Physically, women arnt as strong as men. And therefore more likely to be physically harmed .. E.g being attacked sexually, verbally and domestically assaulted, stalked Getting their drinks spiked, murdered.. And in sports, risk of being out performed and pushed aside by transgender women. That's what I was pondering. As for job roles yes. Women are generally less suited for physically demanding roles except for some exceptions.. The best person for the job should apply... Personally I have seen some women take on car mechanic job roles and not being adept in that role, but there's one woman who's bloody good at the job. I agree. I've seen women who are better than some men in physically demanding jobs. However they're the exception. But it takes a toll on them metally and physically in the long run. Being a financial sclave to the corporate is the greatest achievement sold to women by feminism" You need to look at the political manipulation of women, historically (and currently). Getting women into the workplace while the men went to war. Promoting the home and family and woman's place in home, so men back from war have jobs to go into. The current benefits structure to get women into work (I'm thinking single mothers) or have their benefits stopped... Don't just blame feminism. The concept of equality in the working place (same wage for same job), in education, voting, etc etc. Of course the sexes aren't equal but should be treated equally (with caveats for physicality, pregnancy and breastfeeding). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
), work.
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
"Try getting tested for testosterone lol or an OP on a testicular cyst... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
"Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive. The feminists are on a destructive mission | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
"You still haven’t answered my question about voting rights. Please confirm, women should have the same voting rights as men, correct? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
"It’s ok for anyone, male or female, or be strong and independent. Nobody *needs* to settle down, procreate and live to traditional ‘norms’ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
You still haven’t answered my question about voting rights.
Please confirm, women should have the same voting rights as men, correct?"They had that right long before I was born. And it's not like women took to the streets demanding that right. Some corpporate men decided to embark on this feminist ideology, to break the family union, exploit the 50% of the population they had no access to. And men's protection to their women was a barrier they need to break in order to get to the prize. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
You still haven’t answered my question about voting rights.
Please confirm, women should have the same voting rights as men, correct?
They had that right long before I was born. And it's not like women took to the streets demanding that right. Some corpporate men decided to embark on this feminist ideology, to break the family union, exploit the 50% of the population they had no access to. And men's protection to their women was a barrier they need to break in order to get to the prize. "Divide and conquer | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
You still haven’t answered my question about voting rights.
Please confirm, women should have the same voting rights as men, correct?
They had that right long before I was born. And it's not like women took to the streets demanding that right. Some corpporate men decided to embark on this feminist ideology, to break the family union, exploit the 50% of the population they had no access to. And men's protection to their women was a barrier they need to break in order to get to the prize. "I didn’t ask whether they had the right to vote. I asked whether you agreed that they should have the right to vote. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
It’s ok for anyone, male or female, or be strong and independent. Nobody *needs* to settle down, procreate and live to traditional ‘norms’"You only say that because you live in a privileged country that have the luxury to print money in order to pay it's dept. The moment that privilege dade away, the whole house built on sand will come down crashing. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
It’s ok for anyone, male or female, or be strong and independent. Nobody *needs* to settle down, procreate and live to traditional ‘norms’
You only say that because you live in a privileged country that have the luxury to print money in order to pay it's dept.
The moment that privilege dade away, the whole house built on sand will come down crashing. "No I say that because I don’t agree with a society that dictates what its citizens should ‘be’ or what their role is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
You still haven’t answered my question about voting rights.
Please confirm, women should have the same voting rights as men, correct?
They had that right long before I was born. And it's not like women took to the streets demanding that right. Some corpporate men decided to embark on this feminist ideology, to break the family union, exploit the 50% of the population they had no access to. And men's protection to their women was a barrier they need to break in order to get to the prize.
I didn’t ask whether they had the right to vote. I asked whether you agreed that they should have the right to vote.
"I can give my right to vote to the next woman I cross in the street so she can have double the right. Voting is an illusion anyway. If you think you have a choice on who rules you, you're deluded. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
You still haven’t answered my question about voting rights.
Please confirm, women should have the same voting rights as men, correct?
They had that right long before I was born. And it's not like women took to the streets demanding that right. Some corpporate men decided to embark on this feminist ideology, to break the family union, exploit the 50% of the population they had no access to. And men's protection to their women was a barrier they need to break in order to get to the prize.
I didn’t ask whether they had the right to vote. I asked whether you agreed that they should have the right to vote.
I can give my right to vote to the next woman I cross in the street so she can have double the right. Voting is an illusion anyway. If you think you have a choice on who rules you, you're deluded. "You could have easily answered the question by now. Why the reticence? Do you believe that women should have the same voting rights as men? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
It’s ok for anyone, male or female, or be strong and independent. Nobody *needs* to settle down, procreate and live to traditional ‘norms’
You only say that because you live in a privileged country that have the luxury to print money in order to pay it's dept.
The moment that privilege dade away, the whole house built on sand will come down crashing.
No I say that because I don’t agree with a society that dictates what its citizens should ‘be’ or what their role is. "You just agree to be brainwashed since a todler to make the choices they decide for you | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
It’s ok for anyone, male or female, or be strong and independent. Nobody *needs* to settle down, procreate and live to traditional ‘norms’
You only say that because you live in a privileged country that have the luxury to print money in order to pay it's dept.
The moment that privilege dade away, the whole house built on sand will come down crashing.
No I say that because I don’t agree with a society that dictates what its citizens should ‘be’ or what their role is.
You just agree to be brainwashed since a todler to make the choices they decide for you"Didn’t you say you get your moral code from a book? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
You still haven’t answered my question about voting rights.
Please confirm, women should have the same voting rights as men, correct?
They had that right long before I was born. And it's not like women took to the streets demanding that right. Some corpporate men decided to embark on this feminist ideology, to break the family union, exploit the 50% of the population they had no access to. And men's protection to their women was a barrier they need to break in order to get to the prize.
I didn’t ask whether they had the right to vote. I asked whether you agreed that they should have the right to vote.
I can give my right to vote to the next woman I cross in the street so she can have double the right. Voting is an illusion anyway. If you think you have a choice on who rules you, you're deluded.
You could have easily answered the question by now. Why the reticence?
Do you believe that women should have the same voting rights as men?"You and I live in 2 different planets. You're not even listening to what I am saying. I believe I already answered your question. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"The concept of equality should always be followed by the institutions - equal access to education, healthcare (we're only now getting menopause support as it's not a male thing ), work.
Just another excuse to take money out of men's pockets and give it to women without a thank you. In the contrary, men get shouted on their faces: "We don't need a man" "I am a strong independent woman". The system has killed relationships by giving women the illusion and feel that they don't need men to survive.
The feminists are on a destructive mission
You still haven’t answered my question about voting rights.
Please confirm, women should have the same voting rights as men, correct?
They had that right long before I was born. And it's not like women took to the streets demanding that right. Some corpporate men decided to embark on this feminist ideology, to break the family union, exploit the 50% of the population they had no access to. And men's protection to their women was a barrier they need to break in order to get to the prize.
I didn’t ask whether they had the right to vote. I asked whether you agreed that they should have the right to vote.
I can give my right to vote to the next woman I cross in the street so she can have double the right. Voting is an illusion anyway. If you think you have a choice on who rules you, you're deluded.
You could have easily answered the question by now. Why the reticence?
Do you believe that women should have the same voting rights as men?
You and I live in 2 different planets. You're not even listening to what I am saying. I believe I already answered your question. "We do indeed. And no, you haven’t answered it. You’ve danced around it without answering directly (it’s a yes/no answer) Do you believe that women should have the same voting rights as men? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed?" Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"I find it really interesting that it is mainly men arguing about the rights of women on this thread, trying to out smart each other for the win. The OP was pretty clear on the male influence in the examples provided that created the "shit deal" " Isn't that what this place is about? Trying to 'win' | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? " Evolution | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution" What's that a female Goddess? Lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? " Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What is feminism? My question remains unanswered… Ask 100 people and get 100 different answers. I asked it of one person though
One simplified googled definition amongst many:
"the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes."
That’s a good thing, right? I’m sure we can al agree on that much.
I disagree with it wholesale"Clearly you feel that The West had lost its way. Let's look at other cultures. Within your own demographic/culture, what proportion of people would you say agree with your vision of the rights, roles and responsibilities of women? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol" Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? " God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs" I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? " Why are you only concerned with cancer in children? Should the question be why did god create cancer? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? Why are you only concerned with cancer in children? Should the question be why did god create cancer?" Because I can understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which affects the older generation or those who punish their body with overwork, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I can’t understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which kills children. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? Why are you only concerned with cancer in children? Should the question be why did god create cancer? Because I can understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which affects the older generation or those who punish their body with overwork, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I can’t understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which kills children. You can't understand god is all you need to say." If you can’t see the very clear and obvious difference between the two examples I gave, I’m not sure I can help you. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? Why are you only concerned with cancer in children? Should the question be why did god create cancer? Because I can understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which affects the older generation or those who punish their body with overwork, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I can’t understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which kills children. " You can't understand god, but more importantly you can't understand faith. If you do not have faith, why would you expect to understand anything you ask? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? Why are you only concerned with cancer in children? Should the question be why did god create cancer? Because I can understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which affects the older generation or those who punish their body with overwork, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I can’t understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which kills children. You can't understand god, but more importantly you can't understand faith. If you do not have faith, why would you expect to understand anything you ask? " I suspect I understand faith better than some religious folk. If someone has faith strong enough, then the reality of their god’s existence actually ceases to matter - for example. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? Why are you only concerned with cancer in children? Should the question be why did god create cancer? Because I can understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which affects the older generation or those who punish their body with overwork, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I can’t understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which kills children. You can't understand god, but more importantly you can't understand faith. If you do not have faith, why would you expect to understand anything you ask? I suspect I understand faith better than some religious folk. If someone has faith strong enough, then the reality of their god’s existence actually ceases to matter - for example. " If you had faith, you would trust in things that do not make total sense | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? " Because I read, in it's original language. No man can write a book like it, and no man can process thought the wording in it, the structure of it, the mathematical coding in it, the impredictable geometrical and arythmetic simaitry incoded in it. It's a masterpiece of literary art, yet it's content is not about art. A long message where your creator speak directly into your heart, while blowing your mind with proofs and prophecies about the genuinity of his message and the seriousness of it. Yet, the book was delivered by an illiterate man from a society that never wrote a book before. This book stood the test of time, corruption and even total collapse of civilization. Try read it for yourself. It's not something I can describe. You have to experience it yourself. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? Why are you only concerned with cancer in children? Should the question be why did god create cancer? Because I can understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which affects the older generation or those who punish their body with overwork, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I can’t understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which kills children. You can't understand god, but more importantly you can't understand faith. If you do not have faith, why would you expect to understand anything you ask? I suspect I understand faith better than some religious folk. If someone has faith strong enough, then the reality of their god’s existence actually ceases to matter - for example. If you had faith, you would trust in things that do not make total sense " And I would also question why my loving god chose to kill innocent children. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? Why are you only concerned with cancer in children? Should the question be why did god create cancer? Because I can understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which affects the older generation or those who punish their body with overwork, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I can’t understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which kills children. You can't understand god, but more importantly you can't understand faith. If you do not have faith, why would you expect to understand anything you ask? I suspect I understand faith better than some religious folk. If someone has faith strong enough, then the reality of their god’s existence actually ceases to matter - for example. If you had faith, you would trust in things that do not make total sense And I would also question why my loving god chose to kill innocent children." Which brings your faith into doubt | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? Why are you only concerned with cancer in children? Should the question be why did god create cancer? Because I can understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which affects the older generation or those who punish their body with overwork, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I can’t understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which kills children. You can't understand god, but more importantly you can't understand faith. If you do not have faith, why would you expect to understand anything you ask? I suspect I understand faith better than some religious folk. If someone has faith strong enough, then the reality of their god’s existence actually ceases to matter - for example. If you had faith, you would trust in things that do not make total sense And I would also question why my loving god chose to kill innocent children. Which brings your faith into doubt" You’d think so. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? " That's like saying: "I am not seeking water, I am just thirsty for it" When the inteligent design evidence smashes you on the face, atheist straight jump to the emotional argum | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? Why are you only concerned with cancer in children? Should the question be why did god create cancer? Because I can understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which affects the older generation or those who punish their body with overwork, alcohol, cigarettes etc. I can’t understand a theoretical ‘god’ creating an illness which kills children. You can't understand god, but more importantly you can't understand faith. If you do not have faith, why would you expect to understand anything you ask? I suspect I understand faith better than some religious folk. If someone has faith strong enough, then the reality of their god’s existence actually ceases to matter - for example. If you had faith, you would trust in things that do not make total sense And I would also question why my loving god chose to kill innocent children. Which brings your faith into doubt You’d think so." Funny thing faith, if you have it there is no shaking the foundations and that is where the trouble begins. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? That's like saying: "I am not seeking water, I am just thirsty for it" When the inteligent design evidence smashes you on the face, atheist straight jump to the emotional argum" You’re assuming that it using emotion, not as has been explained clearly I’m not. I’m using logic. There must be a purpose to cancer in children, else a creator wouldn’t have created it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? That's like saying: "I am not seeking water, I am just thirsty for it" When the inteligent design evidence smashes you on the face, atheist straight jump to the emotional argum You’re assuming that it using emotion, not as has been explained clearly I’m not. I’m using logic. There must be a purpose to cancer in children, else a creator wouldn’t have created it." I am not assuming. "If God exists, then why children catch cancer" Or why does he allow Natzis like Hitler, Natanyahu, and Tony Blair to commit attrocities? That's an emotional take to a dational question. God's existance and God's goodness are 2 seperate subjects. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? That's like saying: "I am not seeking water, I am just thirsty for it" When the inteligent design evidence smashes you on the face, atheist straight jump to the emotional argum You’re assuming that it using emotion, not as has been explained clearly I’m not. I’m using logic. There must be a purpose to cancer in children, else a creator wouldn’t have created it. I am not assuming. "If God exists, then why children catch cancer" Or why does he allow Natzis like Hitler, Natanyahu, and Tony Blair to commit attrocities? That's an emotional take to a dational question. God's existance and God's goodness are 2 seperate subjects. " You’re assuming that I’m arguing from an emotional perspective because you don’t have a logical answer. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? Because I read, in it's original language. No man can write a book like it, and no man can process thought the wording in it, the structure of it, the mathematical coding in it, the impredictable geometrical and arythmetic simaitry incoded in it. It's a masterpiece of literary art, yet it's content is not about art. A long message where your creator speak directly into your heart, while blowing your mind with proofs and prophecies about the genuinity of his message and the seriousness of it. Yet, the book was delivered by an illiterate man from a society that never wrote a book before. This book stood the test of time, corruption and even total collapse of civilization. Try read it for yourself. It's not something I can describe. You have to experience it yourself. " Those are good points but they are not proof. I am not for one moment saying the Quran is not a masterful piece of literature but there remains no proof it was the word of God. Only the word of a man who said it was the word of God. And the state if Mohammed’s abilities can equally be part of the creationist story but unless you were there, you have no way of knowing if they were true or part of the “legend building”. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? That's like saying: "I am not seeking water, I am just thirsty for it" When the inteligent design evidence smashes you on the face, atheist straight jump to the emotional argum You’re assuming that it using emotion, not as has been explained clearly I’m not. I’m using logic. There must be a purpose to cancer in children, else a creator wouldn’t have created it. I am not assuming. "If God exists, then why children catch cancer" Or why does he allow Natzis like Hitler, Natanyahu, and Tony Blair to commit attrocities? That's an emotional take to a dational question. God's existance and God's goodness are 2 seperate subjects. You’re assuming that I’m arguing from an emotional perspective because you don’t have a logical answer." You deflected from arguing about the existance of God to "If God exists then why does he allow bad things to happen?" Using the emotional card like a woman trying to sneak her way outa trouble. I am not obliged to follow up on your emotional irrelevant question to whether God exist or not. There are p | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? That's like saying: "I am not seeking water, I am just thirsty for it" When the inteligent design evidence smashes you on the face, atheist straight jump to the emotional argum You’re assuming that it using emotion, not as has been explained clearly I’m not. I’m using logic. There must be a purpose to cancer in children, else a creator wouldn’t have created it. I am not assuming. "If God exists, then why children catch cancer" Or why does he allow Natzis like Hitler, Natanyahu, and Tony Blair to commit attrocities? That's an emotional take to a dational question. God's existance and God's goodness are 2 seperate subjects. " At the risk of being accused of a pile on (I am genuinely interested in your line of thinking and note to those considering policing - I am being polite not attacking)… God gives us free will so does not control the existence of someone like Hitler or the Nazis. So that is surely totally different to the question being asked as to why would God punish innocent children by allowing them to be terminally ill? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? Because I read, in it's original language. No man can write a book like it, and no man can process thought the wording in it, the structure of it, the mathematical coding in it, the impredictable geometrical and arythmetic simaitry incoded in it. It's a masterpiece of literary art, yet it's content is not about art. A long message where your creator speak directly into your heart, while blowing your mind with proofs and prophecies about the genuinity of his message and the seriousness of it. Yet, the book was delivered by an illiterate man from a society that never wrote a book before. This book stood the test of time, corruption and even total collapse of civilization. Try read it for yourself. It's not something I can describe. You have to experience it yourself. " Isn't that literally what all the Abrahamic religions say? The similarities are in each of them which given they all originated from the same geographic area says more about nomadic people sitting round camp fires and swapping stories etc.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? That's like saying: "I am not seeking water, I am just thirsty for it" When the inteligent design evidence smashes you on the face, atheist straight jump to the emotional argum You’re assuming that it using emotion, not as has been explained clearly I’m not. I’m using logic. There must be a purpose to cancer in children, else a creator wouldn’t have created it. I am not assuming. "If God exists, then why children catch cancer" Or why does he allow Natzis like Hitler, Natanyahu, and Tony Blair to commit attrocities? That's an emotional take to a dational question. God's existance and God's goodness are 2 seperate subjects. You’re assuming that I’m arguing from an emotional perspective because you don’t have a logical answer. You deflected from arguing about the existance of God to "If God exists then why does he allow bad things to happen?" Using the emotional card like a woman trying to sneak her way outa trouble. I am not obliged to follow up on your emotional irrelevant question to whether God exist or not. There are p" Basically your irrational process thought is: If I don't like what God has allowed to happen, then he doesn't exist. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? Because I read, in it's original language. No man can write a book like it, and no man can process thought the wording in it, the structure of it, the mathematical coding in it, the impredictable geometrical and arythmetic simaitry incoded in it. It's a masterpiece of literary art, yet it's content is not about art. A long message where your creator speak directly into your heart, while blowing your mind with proofs and prophecies about the genuinity of his message and the seriousness of it. Yet, the book was delivered by an illiterate man from a society that never wrote a book before. This book stood the test of time, corruption and even total collapse of civilization. Try read it for yourself. It's not something I can describe. You have to experience it yourself. Isn't that literally what all the Abrahamic religions say? The similarities are in each of them which given they all originated from the same geographic area says more about nomadic people sitting round camp fires and swapping stories etc.." Just because we're talking about the existance of God in this thread. It doesn't necessarily mean that this thread has plagiarized a book talking about God that's out there. And the Quran comfirm that God has revealed the Torah to Moses, the Zabur to David and the Gospel to Jesus. It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? Because I read, in it's original language. No man can write a book like it, and no man can process thought the wording in it, the structure of it, the mathematical coding in it, the impredictable geometrical and arythmetic simaitry incoded in it. It's a masterpiece of literary art, yet it's content is not about art. A long message where your creator speak directly into your heart, while blowing your mind with proofs and prophecies about the genuinity of his message and the seriousness of it. Yet, the book was delivered by an illiterate man from a society that never wrote a book before. This book stood the test of time, corruption and even total collapse of civilization. Try read it for yourself. It's not something I can describe. You have to experience it yourself. Isn't that literally what all the Abrahamic religions say? The similarities are in each of them which given they all originated from the same geographic area says more about nomadic people sitting round camp fires and swapping stories etc.. Just because we're talking about the existance of God in this thread. It doesn't necessarily mean that this thread has plagiarized a book talking about God that's out there. And the Quran comfirm that God has revealed the Torah to Moses, the Zabur to David and the Gospel to Jesus. It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. " do you have faith in god? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. " What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? Because I read, in it's original language. No man can write a book like it, and no man can process thought the wording in it, the structure of it, the mathematical coding in it, the impredictable geometrical and arythmetic simaitry incoded in it. It's a masterpiece of literary art, yet it's content is not about art. A long message where your creator speak directly into your heart, while blowing your mind with proofs and prophecies about the genuinity of his message and the seriousness of it. Yet, the book was delivered by an illiterate man from a society that never wrote a book before. This book stood the test of time, corruption and even total collapse of civilization. Try read it for yourself. It's not something I can describe. You have to experience it yourself. Isn't that literally what all the Abrahamic religions say? The similarities are in each of them which given they all originated from the same geographic area says more about nomadic people sitting round camp fires and swapping stories etc.. Just because we're talking about the existance of God in this thread. It doesn't necessarily mean that this thread has plagiarized a book talking about God that's out there. And the Quran comfirm that God has revealed the Torah to Moses, the Zabur to David and the Gospel to Jesus. It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. " And if it turns out in the next few hundred years another prophet surfaces who tells us that Mohammed was close but not the final prophet because there is more that God now wants us to know because we have lost our way despite several attempts to get it right? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Who designed parasites, or cancer in children? God. You're charging your question with emotions, because the rational way doesn't support your beliefs I’m not charging it with emotion, I’m seeking knowledge - Why did god create cancer in children? What purpose does it serve? That's like saying: "I am not seeking water, I am just thirsty for it" When the inteligent design evidence smashes you on the face, atheist straight jump to the emotional argum You’re assuming that it using emotion, not as has been explained clearly I’m not. I’m using logic. There must be a purpose to cancer in children, else a creator wouldn’t have created it. I am not assuming. "If God exists, then why children catch cancer" Or why does he allow Natzis like Hitler, Natanyahu, and Tony Blair to commit attrocities? That's an emotional take to a dational question. God's existance and God's goodness are 2 seperate subjects. You’re assuming that I’m arguing from an emotional perspective because you don’t have a logical answer. You deflected from arguing about the existance of God to "If God exists then why does he allow bad things to happen?" Using the emotional card like a woman trying to sneak her way outa trouble. I am not obliged to follow up on your emotional irrelevant question to whether God exist or not. There are p Basically your irrational process thought is: If I don't like what God has allowed to happen, then he doesn't exist. " No, my process is that I believe God doesn’t exist, and here’s a question to pose to theists in order to gauge their thought process. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? Because I read, in it's original language. No man can write a book like it, and no man can process thought the wording in it, the structure of it, the mathematical coding in it, the impredictable geometrical and arythmetic simaitry incoded in it. It's a masterpiece of literary art, yet it's content is not about art. A long message where your creator speak directly into your heart, while blowing your mind with proofs and prophecies about the genuinity of his message and the seriousness of it. Yet, the book was delivered by an illiterate man from a society that never wrote a book before. This book stood the test of time, corruption and even total collapse of civilization. Try read it for yourself. It's not something I can describe. You have to experience it yourself. Isn't that literally what all the Abrahamic religions say? The similarities are in each of them which given they all originated from the same geographic area says more about nomadic people sitting round camp fires and swapping stories etc.. Just because we're talking about the existance of God in this thread. It doesn't necessarily mean that this thread has plagiarized a book talking about God that's out there. And the Quran comfirm that God has revealed the Torah to Moses, the Zabur to David and the Gospel to Jesus. It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. " I'm aware ish of the story about the books etc, it makes no sense whatsoever to set man against man at such a time .. Simply tribalism where one lot claim authority over the other based upon their book which is the better one to live by.. It's only been about power by those seeking to manipulate and control.. And science as we have learnt and are learning has shown it thus, which unsurprisingly those who seek to maintain the status quo with the power and influence in some countries their book brings.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? Because I read, in it's original language. No man can write a book like it, and no man can process thought the wording in it, the structure of it, the mathematical coding in it, the impredictable geometrical and arythmetic simaitry incoded in it. It's a masterpiece of literary art, yet it's content is not about art. A long message where your creator speak directly into your heart, while blowing your mind with proofs and prophecies about the genuinity of his message and the seriousness of it. Yet, the book was delivered by an illiterate man from a society that never wrote a book before. This book stood the test of time, corruption and even total collapse of civilization. Try read it for yourself. It's not something I can describe. You have to experience it yourself. Isn't that literally what all the Abrahamic religions say? The similarities are in each of them which given they all originated from the same geographic area says more about nomadic people sitting round camp fires and swapping stories etc.. Just because we're talking about the existance of God in this thread. It doesn't necessarily mean that this thread has plagiarized a book talking about God that's out there. And the Quran comfirm that God has revealed the Torah to Moses, the Zabur to David and the Gospel to Jesus. It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. do you have faith in god?" Only his own one I wager.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were?" There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions " How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions " But all that says is at the time of Mohammed someone made copies of the manuscripts and then got them distributed around the known world. Nothing more! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions But all that says is at the time of Mohammed someone made copies of the manuscripts and then got them distributed around the known world. Nothing more! " In other words they may well be “the word(s) of Mohammed” but still no proof they are “the word of God” | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions But all that says is at the time of Mohammed someone made copies of the manuscripts and then got them distributed around the known world. Nothing more! In other words they may well be “the word(s) of Mohammed” but still no proof they are “the word of God”" All books are written by humans. Or AI. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions But all that says is at the time of Mohammed someone made copies of the manuscripts and then got them distributed around the known world. Nothing more! " Same was done with the 90+ books of the bible. Despite the central authority of Rome, there isn't 2 manusicripts that are identical in the content | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions " What about the recensions made under Caliph Uthman? What was changed from before? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions But all that says is at the time of Mohammed someone made copies of the manuscripts and then got them distributed around the known world. Nothing more! In other words they may well be “the word(s) of Mohammed” but still no proof they are “the word of God”" We have 100's of books, containing 10000's of his words. They are nothing like the Quran. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? Because I read, in it's original language. No man can write a book like it, and no man can process thought the wording in it, the structure of it, the mathematical coding in it, the impredictable geometrical and arythmetic simaitry incoded in it. It's a masterpiece of literary art, yet it's content is not about art. A long message where your creator speak directly into your heart, while blowing your mind with proofs and prophecies about the genuinity of his message and the seriousness of it. Yet, the book was delivered by an illiterate man from a society that never wrote a book before. This book stood the test of time, corruption and even total collapse of civilization. Try read it for yourself. It's not something I can describe. You have to experience it yourself. Isn't that literally what all the Abrahamic religions say? The similarities are in each of them which given they all originated from the same geographic area says more about nomadic people sitting round camp fires and swapping stories etc.. Just because we're talking about the existance of God in this thread. It doesn't necessarily mean that this thread has plagiarized a book talking about God that's out there. And the Quran comfirm that God has revealed the Torah to Moses, the Zabur to David and the Gospel to Jesus. It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. do you have faith in god? Only his own one I wager.." I have no doubt that is the case, I have feeling that simple question will never be answered, it opens to many doors. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions But all that says is at the time of Mohammed someone made copies of the manuscripts and then got them distributed around the known world. Nothing more! In other words they may well be “the word(s) of Mohammed” but still no proof they are “the word of God” We have 100's of books, containing 10000's of his words. They are nothing like the Quran. " Even western Secular and Christian Scholars admit that the Quran is not Mohamed's words. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..?" I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"There is a word for people who hear voices." Which voice told you your great grand father was a monkey again? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"There is a word for people who hear voices. Which voice told you your great grand father was a monkey again? " The Koran said Allah changed people into pigs and monkeys. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"There is a word for people who hear voices. Which voice told you your great grand father was a monkey again? " I don’t think you understand evolutionary timescales How old is the Earth according to the Koran? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript?" Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"There is a word for people who hear voices. Which voice told you your great grand father was a monkey again? " I think you are getting me mixed up with another poster. Are you hearing voices. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers" Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"If the sexes are not equal, can not be equal and they are not supposed to be equal by design. Design? You think that men and women were designed? Only a blind minded person can't see the design. Who designed the dick and vagina? Or the sophisticated camera called eyes? Or the super computer called brain? Evolution What's that a female Goddess? Lol Can I ask why you believe the Quran to be the verbatim word of God? What proof do you have? How do you know the revelations were genuine? Because I read, in it's original language. No man can write a book like it, and no man can process thought the wording in it, the structure of it, the mathematical coding in it, the impredictable geometrical and arythmetic simaitry incoded in it. It's a masterpiece of literary art, yet it's content is not about art. A long message where your creator speak directly into your heart, while blowing your mind with proofs and prophecies about the genuinity of his message and the seriousness of it. Yet, the book was delivered by an illiterate man from a society that never wrote a book before. This book stood the test of time, corruption and even total collapse of civilization. Try read it for yourself. It's not something I can describe. You have to experience it yourself. Isn't that literally what all the Abrahamic religions say? The similarities are in each of them which given they all originated from the same geographic area says more about nomadic people sitting round camp fires and swapping stories etc.. Just because we're talking about the existance of God in this thread. It doesn't necessarily mean that this thread has plagiarized a book talking about God that's out there. And the Quran comfirm that God has revealed the Torah to Moses, the Zabur to David and the Gospel to Jesus. It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. do you have faith in god? Only his own one I wager.. I have no doubt that is the case, I have feeling that simple question will never be answered, it opens to many doors." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"There is a word for people who hear voices. Which voice told you your great grand father was a monkey again? I don’t think you understand evolutionary timescales How old is the Earth according to the Koran? " Reminds me of Christian apologists, when they get debunked: "You don't understand God because you don't have the holy spirit" lol The Quran doesn't give an age to earth. By the way, the word Earth is an Arabic word borriwed from the Quran | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"There is a word for people who hear voices. Which voice told you your great grand father was a monkey again? I don’t think you understand evolutionary timescales How old is the Earth according to the Koran? Reminds me of Christian apologists, when they get debunked: "You don't understand God because you don't have the holy spirit" lol The Quran doesn't give an age to earth. By the way, the word Earth is an Arabic word borriwed from the Quran "You haven’t debunked anything. We can date the age of the universe by measuring light. We can date the age of the earth and solar system by looking at the materials contained within it. I wondered whether the Koran mentioned it, that is all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution.."Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The Quran doesn't give an age to earth. By the way, the word Earth is an Arabic word borriwed from the Quran "Also the word Earth is Anglo-Saxon in origin. From Ertho, and later Eorthe | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction "‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’? Backup your claim. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The Quran doesn't give an age to earth. By the way, the word Earth is an Arabic word borriwed from the Quran
Also the word Earth is Anglo-Saxon in origin. From Ertho, and later Eorthe "And where the Germanic people got it from? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"By the way, the word Earth is an Arabic word borriwed from the Quran "That's not true. The English etymology is via Germanic roots. The word predates the Koran, through Turkish/Armenian and Hebrew (Bible) usage, as well as Arabic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction "What the evidence hasn't differed from (despite the fact that scientists will when presented with new scientific information reassess their original findings) is that there it's commonly accepted that no deity made man/women and nature etc.. Regardless of whatever book claims.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The Quran doesn't give an age to earth. By the way, the word Earth is an Arabic word borriwed from the Quran
Also the word Earth is Anglo-Saxon in origin. From Ertho, and later Eorthe
And where the Germanic people got it from? "Wherever they got it from, it was pre-Koran. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim."The thread is too small to deviate into 100 braches. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The Quran doesn't give an age to earth. By the way, the word Earth is an Arabic word borriwed from the Quran
Also the word Earth is Anglo-Saxon in origin. From Ertho, and later Eorthe
And where the Germanic people got it from? "You can never accept you’re wrong, can you? Also you never did answer my yes/no question about women voting. Don’t worry, it’s not gone unnoticed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate into 100 braches. "A link will suffice. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The Quran doesn't give an age to earth. By the way, the word Earth is an Arabic word borriwed from the Quran
Also the word Earth is Anglo-Saxon in origin. From Ertho, and later Eorthe
And where the Germanic people got it from?
Wherever they got it from, it was pre-Koran."Do you have any Germanic writing, or engraving containing the Word Ertho before the 7th century? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate into 100 braches. "99/1 adds up to 100. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" The Quran doesn't give an age to earth. By the way, the word Earth is an Arabic word borriwed from the Quran
Also the word Earth is Anglo-Saxon in origin. From Ertho, and later Eorthe
And where the Germanic people got it from?
Wherever they got it from, it was pre-Koran.
Do you have any Germanic writing, or engraving containing the Word Ertho before the 7th century? "Proto-Germanic (ardi) spans 500 BCE to 200 AD. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction "I like this! Your contrast between scientific and religious views highlights the diversity and complexity of human thought and how people seek to understand the world around them. Living your life in a way that aligns with your understanding of the world and promotes personal wellbeing is to be applauded. However, if your beliefs compel you to impose them on others who perceive the world differently, it raises questions about the validity of your beliefs. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate
into 100 braches.
A link will suffice. "There is a list of 1000's of scientists from all relevent fields gathered by the Discovery Institute sin 1990's and they signed dissent petitions against the Darwinian indoctrination as if it's a scientific fact when it's a mere work of fiction. "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged." There isn't a single species in the entire human history that have been observed to evolve into another species in nature. Zero. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate
into 100 braches.
A link will suffice.
There is a list of 1000's of scientists from all relevent fields gathered by the Discovery Institute sin 1990's and they signed dissent petitions against the Darwinian indoctrination as if it's a scientific fact when it's a mere work of fiction.
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
There isn't a single species in the entire human history that have been observed to evolve into another species in nature. Zero. "Why do people need to get flu vaccines every year? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate
into 100 braches.
A link will suffice.
There is a list of 1000's of scientists from all relevent fields gathered by the Discovery Institute sin 1990's and they signed dissent petitions against the Darwinian indoctrination as if it's a scientific fact when it's a mere work of fiction.
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
There isn't a single species in the entire human history that have been observed to evolve into another species in nature. Zero. "And even if you observe one case of mutation, that doesn't prove that the other millions of species all came from one original single cell millions years ago. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate
into 100 braches.
A link will suffice.
There is a list of 1000's of scientists from all relevent fields gathered by the Discovery Institute sin 1990's and they signed dissent petitions against the Darwinian indoctrination as if it's a scientific fact when it's a mere work of fiction.
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
There isn't a single species in the entire human history that have been observed to evolve into another species in nature. Zero.
And even if you observe one case of mutation, that doesn't prove that the other millions of species all came from one original single cell millions years ago.
"“Even if you show me potential evidence of something it still doesn’t mean I’m not right” What’s your expertise in evolutionary theory, out of interest? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate
into 100 braches.
A link will suffice.
There is a list of 1000's of scientists from all relevent fields gathered by the Discovery Institute sin 1990's and they signed dissent petitions against the Darwinian indoctrination as if it's a scientific fact when it's a mere work of fiction.
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
There isn't a single species in the entire human history that have been observed to evolve into another species in nature. Zero.
Why do people need to get flu vaccines every year? "Make your point, I am not filling a job application here | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate
into 100 braches.
A link will suffice.
There is a list of 1000's of scientists from all relevent fields gathered by the Discovery Institute sin 1990's and they signed dissent petitions against the Darwinian indoctrination as if it's a scientific fact when it's a mere work of fiction.
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
There isn't a single species in the entire human history that have been observed to evolve into another species in nature. Zero.
Why do people need to get flu vaccines every year?
Make your point, I am not filling a job application here"No, I didn’t expect you to answer. You generally don’t. (Like whether women should have the right to vote, or whether adults should be able to sleep with children). We have to have regular flu vaccines because of antigenic drift. You can Google that and see what it is. Then think hard about what it means. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions But all that says is at the time of Mohammed someone made copies of the manuscripts and then got them distributed around the known world. Nothing more! Same was done with the 90+ books of the bible. Despite the central authority of Rome, there isn't 2 manusicripts that are identical in the content" And…? You have just proven my point. You cannot prove any of the “books” are the word or or from God only that some men (and it is exclusively men) wrote sone words and claimed them to be the word of God via revelations etc. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate
into 100 braches.
A link will suffice.
There is a list of 1000's of scientists from all relevent fields gathered by the Discovery Institute sin 1990's and they signed dissent petitions against the Darwinian indoctrination as if it's a scientific fact when it's a mere work of fiction.
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
There isn't a single species in the entire human history that have been observed to evolve into another species in nature. Zero.
And even if you observe one case of mutation, that doesn't prove that the other millions of species all came from one original single cell millions years ago.
“Even if you show me potential evidence of something it still doesn’t mean I’m not right”
What’s your expertise in evolutionary theory, out of interest?"10000 years of recorded history. Not a single mutation from one species to another. Science is based on emperical evidence not a nice fiction story telling about what someone's imagination about what could've happened millions of years ago taken as a divine revelation. "He is a scientist so it must be true" This is how ancient Greeks used to believe anything the Oracle tells them because "She is an oracle, so it must be true" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions But all that says is at the time of Mohammed someone made copies of the manuscripts and then got them distributed around the known world. Nothing more! In other words they may well be “the word(s) of Mohammed” but still no proof they are “the word of God” We have 100's of books, containing 10000's of his words. They are nothing like the Quran. Even western Secular and Christian Scholars admit that the Quran is not Mohamed's words." Probably a woman ghost writer. After all they are far note talented then most men and can multi-task | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate
into 100 braches.
A link will suffice.
There is a list of 1000's of scientists from all relevent fields gathered by the Discovery Institute sin 1990's and they signed dissent petitions against the Darwinian indoctrination as if it's a scientific fact when it's a mere work of fiction.
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
There isn't a single species in the entire human history that have been observed to evolve into another species in nature. Zero.
And even if you observe one case of mutation, that doesn't prove that the other millions of species all came from one original single cell millions years ago.
“Even if you show me potential evidence of something it still doesn’t mean I’m not right”
What’s your expertise in evolutionary theory, out of interest?
10000 years of recorded history. Not a single mutation from one species to another. Science is based on emperical evidence not a nice fiction story telling about what someone's imagination about what could've happened millions of years ago taken as a divine revelation. "He is a scientist so it must be true"
This is how ancient Greeks used to believe anything the Oracle tells them because "She is an oracle, so it must be true"
"No, I asked ‘your’ expertise in evolutionary theory. I’m reasonably well read on the subject, I’ve visited Darwin’s house and the museum there, own several books on the topic, watched lots of stuff over the years. I’m not an expert, but I’ve read and learned enough to have faith in the theory. You’ve given me nothing to disprove it so far | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" This is how ancient Greeks used to believe anything the Oracle tells them because "She is an oracle, so it must be true"" There is something ironic in that statement I am trying to put my finger on? Perhaps we can prove evolution after all as clearly the Oracle must have evolved into the prophet Mohammed? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate
into 100 braches.
A link will suffice.
There is a list of 1000's of scientists from all relevent fields gathered by the Discovery Institute sin 1990's and they signed dissent petitions against the Darwinian indoctrination as if it's a scientific fact when it's a mere work of fiction.
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
There isn't a single species in the entire human history that have been observed to evolve into another species in nature. Zero.
And even if you observe one case of mutation, that doesn't prove that the other millions of species all came from one original single cell millions years ago.
“Even if you show me potential evidence of something it still doesn’t mean I’m not right”
What’s your expertise in evolutionary theory, out of interest?
10000 years of recorded history. Not a single mutation from one species to another. Science is based on emperical evidence not a nice fiction story telling about what someone's imagination about what could've happened millions of years ago taken as a divine revelation. "He is a scientist so it must be true"
This is how ancient Greeks used to believe anything the Oracle tells them because "She is an oracle, so it must be true"
No, I asked ‘your’ expertise in evolutionary theory.
I’m reasonably well read on the subject, I’ve visited Darwin’s house and the museum there, own several books on the topic, watched lots of stuff over the years. I’m not an expert, but I’ve read and learned enough to have faith in the theory.
You’ve given me nothing to disprove it so far "I am a man with a brain. That's my expertise. Your devoted faith in Darwin is not evidence for his theory. And if you have any scientific basic background you'd know that the Burden of proof is on the claiment. Science doesn't work that way. i.e. You make a claim, then ask people to disprove your claim. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" It makes sense you find common grounds in those revelations. Only difference those previous revelations have corrupted by men. What is the proof of logic behind the Koran not being corrupted, while the other books were? There are manuscripts that were discovered dating back to the time of the Proohet himself. Not a single word have been changed. The same Quran that was passed down generation to generation for 1400 years in geographicaly distant locations in the world, China, Indonesia, Subsaharan Africa, The Philippines, Morocco.... That on itself is a miracle. Compare that with the Old testament or the new testament with 1000's different versions How did the age of such manuscripts get verified..? I would like an answer please A&E..? Is it simply because the book said so that such claims are made, did the people in such far away places know they weren't the only ones at that time with this manuscript? Check the Birmingham manuscript. It was dated by the highest authorities in this field in the the Highest universities of the UK. By non Muslim researchers Science..
The same science that tells us about evolution..
Science is not a person and it changes it's conclusions with new evidence. A lot of evolution scientists say that Darwenian evolution is a work of fiction
‘A lot’? How many is ‘A lot’?
Backup your claim.
The thread is too small to deviate
into 100 braches.
A link will suffice.
There is a list of 1000's of scientists from all relevent fields gathered by the Discovery Institute sin 1990's and they signed dissent petitions against the Darwinian indoctrination as if it's a scientific fact when it's a mere work of fiction.
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
There isn't a single species in the entire human history that have been observed to evolve into another species in nature. Zero.
And even if you observe one case of mutation, that doesn't prove that the other millions of species all came from one original single cell millions years ago.
“Even if you show me potential evidence of something it still doesn’t mean I’m not right”
What’s your expertise in evolutionary theory, out of interest?
10000 years of recorded history. Not a single mutation from one species to another. Science is based on emperical evidence not a nice fiction story telling about what someone's imagination about what could've happened millions of years ago taken as a divine revelation. "He is a scientist so it must be true"
This is how ancient Greeks used to believe anything the Oracle tells them because "She is an oracle, so it must be true"
No, I asked ‘your’ expertise in evolutionary theory.
I’m reasonably well read on the subject, I’ve visited Darwin’s house and the museum there, own several books on the topic, watched lots of stuff over the years. I’m not an expert, but I’ve read and learned enough to have faith in the theory.
You’ve given me nothing to disprove it so far
I am a man with a brain. That's my expertise.
Your devoted faith in Darwin is not evidence for his theory. And if you have any scientific basic background you'd know that the Burden of proof is on the claiment.
Science doesn't work that way. i.e. You make a claim, then ask people to disprove your claim. "And your devoted faith in a creator is not evidence either. You understand that much, don’t you? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"AandE I really want to ask this (this isn’t off topic as it clearly relates to women)… Why are you on a swinger website? What are you hoping to achieve?" I believe that pre-marital and extra marital sex are against the teachings of the Koran. Might be wing though, like most religious texts, I think they’re all a bit pick n choose. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"AandE I really want to ask this (this isn’t off topic as it clearly relates to women)… Why are you on a swinger website? What are you hoping to achieve?" To find unrighteous women. 4:34 "Men are qawwamun in relation to women, according to what God has favored some over others and according to what they spend from their wealth. Righteous women are qanitat, guarding the unseen according to what God has guarded. Those [women] whose nushuz you fear, admonish them, and abandon them in bed, and strike them. If they obey you, do not pursue a strategy against them. Indeed, God is Exalted, Great." "Al-rijal qawwamun ‘ala al-nisa’ bi ma faddala Allahu ba‘duhum ‘ala ba‘din wa bi ma anfaqu min amwalihim. Fa al-salihat qanitat, hafizat li’l-ghayb bi ma hafiza Allah. Wa allati tukhafuna nushuzahunna, fa ‘izuhunna wa ahjuruhunna fi’l-madaji‘ wa adribuhunna, fa in ata‘nakum, fa la tabghu ‘alayhinna sabilan. Inna Allah kana ‘Aliyyan, Kabir." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"AandE I really want to ask this (this isn’t off topic as it clearly relates to women)… Why are you on a swinger website? What are you hoping to achieve? I believe that pre-marital and extra marital sex are against the teachings of the Koran. Might be wing though, like most religious texts, I think they’re all a bit pick n choose." You can get temporary marriage contracts, actually. And concubines are a different class, too. It's not so simple. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"AandE I really want to ask this (this isn’t off topic as it clearly relates to women)… Why are you on a swinger website? What are you hoping to achieve? To find unrighteous women. 4:34 "Men are qawwamun in relation to women, according to what God has favored some over others and according to what they spend from their wealth. Righteous women are qanitat, guarding the unseen according to what God has guarded. Those [women] whose nushuz you fear, admonish them, and abandon them in bed, and strike them. If they obey you, do not pursue a strategy against them. Indeed, God is Exalted, Great." "Al-rijal qawwamun ‘ala al-nisa’ bi ma faddala Allahu ba‘duhum ‘ala ba‘din wa bi ma anfaqu min amwalihim. Fa al-salihat qanitat, hafizat li’l-ghayb bi ma hafiza Allah. Wa allati tukhafuna nushuzahunna, fa ‘izuhunna wa ahjuruhunna fi’l-madaji‘ wa adribuhunna, fa in ata‘nakum, fa la tabghu ‘alayhinna sabilan. Inna Allah kana ‘Aliyyan, Kabir."" What does it mean by ‘strike them’? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
"AandE I really want to ask this (this isn’t off topic as it clearly relates to women)… Why are you on a swinger website? What are you hoping to achieve? I believe that pre-marital and extra marital sex are against the teachings of the Koran. Might be wing though, like most religious texts, I think they’re all a bit pick n choose. You can get temporary marriage contracts, actually. And concubines are a different class, too. It's not so simple." Indeed. Pick n choose, like I said. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
" What does it mean by ‘strike them’?" Consensual impact play, of course. Duh. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) | |||
| Reply privately |
| back to top |  |
