Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think." I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. " Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How do the LibDems pick up 31 seats losing 3.2 pts if replicated. LibDems lost their deposit in Wellingborough. " Presumably because their loss of vote share is less than the Conservatives and so in Lib Dem / Conservative marginals where Laboutr have no chance, the Lib Dems would bleed out less than the Conservatives and still finish with more votes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. " They don't have an open borders policy. And the unions have nothing to do with immigration. So nothing to worry about here. " Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. " Maybe, but I don't think Labour are actually going to do much positive for poorer people. Maybe less austerity. " Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere." Not sure I understand how helping ordinary people would make us worse off? Maybe if the government didn't hand billions to its pals for faulty PPE we could help ordinary people? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How do the LibDems pick up 31 seats losing 3.2 pts if replicated. LibDems lost their deposit in Wellingborough. Presumably because their loss of vote share is less than the Conservatives and so in Lib Dem / Conservative marginals where Laboutr have no chance, the Lib Dems would bleed out less than the Conservatives and still finish with more votes." If you look at the Dems top target in England (Wimbledon) then with Wellingborough swings, it would still result in a Labour win. Labour were 14pts behind the Dems in 2019. Will wait and see but I can't see that many seats for Lib Dems. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere." Economics is really very simple to understand. The concept unfortunately gets tweaked by ideologists who think that extremes of economic levers will bring about better results for one section of the population at the expense of another. The Conservative ideologies since Thatcher have all been about the free market economy and privatisation and this has worked for big business and it has brought great wealth for some. What is now needed is a complete reform of the economics of the country and the next Government needs to simply invest in people - from cradle to grave. We the people generate the economic output of this country. Birth rates are always lower when young people don't feel confident about the future and this really needs to change. The country needs a conveyor belt of well-educated human beings who have been delivered from birth to adulthood well-fed and through an efficient education system. In life generally, people need to be mobile and be able to work and provide for their own families knowing that if illness befalls them, they can be treated quickly and efficiently. We are failing in so many ways and the end result is a declining birth rate, a poor education system, poor healthcare, poor public transport and poor outcomes in life for far too many people. Addressing these issues is not difficult to do and it can be done by any Government. It needs long-term strategic planning and a desire to invest in the future of the people of this country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere." Why are Union paymasters worse than Corporate paymasters? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere. Economics is really very simple to understand. The concept unfortunately gets tweaked by ideologists who think that extremes of economic levers will bring about better results for one section of the population at the expense of another. The Conservative ideologies since Thatcher have all been about the free market economy and privatisation and this has worked for big business and it has brought great wealth for some. What is now needed is a complete reform of the economics of the country and the next Government needs to simply invest in people - from cradle to grave. We the people generate the economic output of this country. Birth rates are always lower when young people don't feel confident about the future and this really needs to change. The country needs a conveyor belt of well-educated human beings who have been delivered from birth to adulthood well-fed and through an efficient education system. In life generally, people need to be mobile and be able to work and provide for their own families knowing that if illness befalls them, they can be treated quickly and efficiently. We are failing in so many ways and the end result is a declining birth rate, a poor education system, poor healthcare, poor public transport and poor outcomes in life for far too many people. Addressing these issues is not difficult to do and it can be done by any Government. It needs long-term strategic planning and a desire to invest in the future of the people of this country. "  stop talking sense! We don’t do that in here. You know that!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere. Why are Union paymasters worse than Corporate paymasters?" Money! union paymaster suck it out, corporates put it in.... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere. Why are Union paymasters worse than Corporate paymasters? Money! union paymaster suck it out, corporates put it in...." Lol there is soooo much I could say to that but I simply really cannot be arsed | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere. Why are Union paymasters worse than Corporate paymasters? Money! union paymaster suck it out, corporates put it in.... Lol there is soooo much I could say to that but I simply really cannot be arsed "You should  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere. Why are Union paymasters worse than Corporate paymasters? Money! union paymaster suck it out, corporates put it in...." ...of what? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere. Why are Union paymasters worse than Corporate paymasters? Money! union paymaster suck it out, corporates put it in.... Lol there is soooo much I could say to that but I simply really cannot be arsed
You should "Nope not biting. Really really CGAFF | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are sleepwalking into a Labour government. Time to emigrate I think. I wouldn't worry, this Labour party are offering little to no change. Maybe just less corruption and narcissism. Mostly no change. Corruption etc. is debatable. Less competent. The worrying part is their open borders policy, their pandering to extremist "progressive" ideology and their need to satisfy their union paymasters. Some people at the very bottom may be better off, particularly if they are a minority group or in a unionised industry. Those of us who aren't any of those and, while not being affluent, can't claim state support or benefits will be worse off as the money has to come from somewhere. Why are Union paymasters worse than Corporate paymasters? Money! union paymaster suck it out, corporates put it in...." Who are these union paymasters? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"28% swing to Labour in Wellingborough yesterday ??. If the Wellingborough voting pattern is repeated at the next General Election, this would make the Conservatives the third Party behind the Lib Dem’s with only 15 seats and Labour would have a 470 seat majority - source “Election Maps U.K.” Surely Sunak realises the gig is over and the longer he continues to squat in Downing Street the worse it is going to be?" What would that mean in seats terms for Reform using the same calculation. I see they got around 13% and the lib dems just under 5%. In fact reform got more than the lib dems, the greens and an independent, combined. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
