Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish." This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here." Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs)" This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. " We can't even return people who have spent a significant amount of time in prison. Have you ever looked at the figures for enforced return? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. We can't even return people who have spent a significant amount of time in prison. Have you ever looked at the figures for enforced return?" Legally we can I meant - there are hurdles, appeals and so on, yes. But there will be for this Irish plan too. The point being, it’s not the same as the Rwanda plan and it’s disingenuous to compare them. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. We can't even return people who have spent a significant amount of time in prison. Have you ever looked at the figures for enforced return? Legally we can I meant - there are hurdles, appeals and so on, yes. But there will be for this Irish plan too. The point being, it’s not the same as the Rwanda plan and it’s disingenuous to compare them." Legally until it gets to court and is ruled unlawful. I'm not talking about Rwanda. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. " its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from" Not sure what point you think you’re making here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. " you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees " That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? " that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion" Do you mean let them drown?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion" Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ " It begins with F | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ It begins with F " The word I was thinking of begins with ‘C’  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ It begins with F The word I was thinking of begins with ‘C’ " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ " luckily for me what some random bloke on a swingers site thinks of me really dosent affect my life in the slightest, and as for leaving them in the channel, simple dont get in a dinghy and they wont face that danger in the first place, after all there already in europe so its not like there escaping a war or anything, well unless there ukies of course | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ luckily for me what some random bloke on a swingers site thinks of me really dosent affect my life in the slightest, and as for leaving them in the channel, simple dont get in a dinghy and they wont face that danger in the first place, after all there already in europe so its not like there escaping a war or anything, well unless there ukies of course"If you could point out where in law it states that an asylum seeker has to stop in any particular country, that’d be great, thanks. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ luckily for me what some random bloke on a swingers site thinks of me really dosent affect my life in the slightest, and as for leaving them in the channel, simple dont get in a dinghy and they wont face that danger in the first place, after all there already in europe so its not like there escaping a war or anything, well unless there ukies of course"You obviously haven’t got a clue what you’re taking about, btw, who told you that the ‘majority ‘ are economic migrants? farage on GB news | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah fabtastic i see you have returned how are you ya C" All good thanks, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no basildon boy thinks im a cunt lol im crushed i tell ya" He might think you’re confused , that begins with C | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ luckily for me what some random bloke on a swingers site thinks of me really dosent affect my life in the slightest, and as for leaving them in the channel, simple dont get in a dinghy and they wont face that danger in the first place, after all there already in europe so its not like there escaping a war or anything, well unless there ukies of course
You obviously haven’t got a clue what you’re taking about, btw, who told you that the ‘majority ‘ are economic migrants? farage on GB news "pmsl ive never watched gb news, and not really a farrage fanboy, like most involved in politics he is a bit of an arse, and whose told you the majority aint economic migrants | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no basildon boy thinks im a cunt lol im crushed i tell ya" Don't worry, you're not the first he's called that. Welcome to the club  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no basildon boy thinks im a cunt lol im crushed i tell ya Don't worry, you're not the first he's called that. Welcome to the club "i doubt he remembers me but he called me that on his last profile ?? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ luckily for me what some random bloke on a swingers site thinks of me really dosent affect my life in the slightest, and as for leaving them in the channel, simple dont get in a dinghy and they wont face that danger in the first place, after all there already in europe so its not like there escaping a war or anything, well unless there ukies of course
You obviously haven’t got a clue what you’re taking about, btw, who told you that the ‘majority ‘ are economic migrants? farage on GB news pmsl ive never watched gb news, and not really a farrage fanboy, like most involved in politics he is a bit of an arse, and whose told you the majority aint economic migrants"The ‘majority ‘ are granted asylum, you should try educating yourself | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no basildon boy thinks im a cunt lol im crushed i tell ya Don't worry, you're not the first he's called that. Welcome to the club "I think it’s valid when someone openly suggests that we let asylum seekers drown, right? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ luckily for me what some random bloke on a swingers site thinks of me really dosent affect my life in the slightest, and as for leaving them in the channel, simple dont get in a dinghy and they wont face that danger in the first place, after all there already in europe so its not like there escaping a war or anything, well unless there ukies of course
You obviously haven’t got a clue what you’re taking about, btw, who told you that the ‘majority ‘ are economic migrants? farage on GB news pmsl ive never watched gb news, and not really a farrage fanboy, like most involved in politics he is a bit of an arse, and whose told you the majority aint economic migrants
The ‘majority ‘ are granted asylum, you should try educating yourself "not if it meens being like you xx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The Government is to start running regular charter flights dedicated to deporting people who have failed in their asylum applications. The first flights, which would use private aircraft hired by the Department of Justice, are expected to happen later this year. The move comes as the Government attempts to present a tougher image on immigration in advance of local and European elections in June. Immigration tops the list of issues getting the attention of voters in the past month, according to public sentiment tracking by Ipsos B&A. Other planned measures included adding Algeria and Botswana to the official list of “safe countries” which will allow faster processing of immigration claims. International protection (IP) applicants coming from those countries are to have their applications decided on within a maximum of 90 days. Not the UK Government of course, but the Irish. This is the deportation of failed asylum seekers *to their country of origin* is it not? Which nations have always been able to do, correct? Not sure what the story is, here. Point is that perception (That they are an extremely open and welcoming country) of the Irish and the reality (That their asylum system would be called fascist if implemented here) are two separate things. If we were to start to deport here then the reality(That we are too generous) would cease to nullify the perception (That we are evil imperialists) and end up significantly reducing the illegal crossings as well as dodgy asylum applicants I welcome this decision by the Irish though they need to tighten their immigration policy or literally be replaced (Ireland naturally has 1000's of native born leave each year as there aren't enough jobs) This isn’t a new decision by The Irish, they’ve deported previously. And it wouldn’t be called fascist if we deported failed asylum seekers to their country of origin - we do that now. The Rwanda project is deporting people to a nation that they didn’t come from. its deporting them to a nation they didnt come from, from a nation they also dont come from Not sure what point you think you’re making here. you think its wrong to send them to a country that there not from,isnt it also wrong for them to rock up in a country there not because lets be honest the majority of them are economic migrants rather than refugees That’s why we have an asylum vetting system, isn’t it? that they know they can game for years, simple answer is dont pick them up out the channel, and before you ask no i wouldnt have a problem with that mmmm i wonder what your gona call me for having that opinion Leaving people to die in the channel rather than blaming the home office for not having an adequate system in place? Yeah you can probably work it out for yourself. And no, it doesn’t begin with ‘R’ luckily for me what some random bloke on a swingers site thinks of me really dosent affect my life in the slightest, and as for leaving them in the channel, simple dont get in a dinghy and they wont face that danger in the first place, after all there already in europe so its not like there escaping a war or anything, well unless there ukies of course
You obviously haven’t got a clue what you’re taking about, btw, who told you that the ‘majority ‘ are economic migrants? farage on GB news pmsl ive never watched gb news, and not really a farrage fanboy, like most involved in politics he is a bit of an arse, and whose told you the majority aint economic migrants
The ‘majority ‘ are granted asylum, you should try educating yourself not if it meens being like you xx"PMSL, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no basildon boy thinks im a cunt lol im crushed i tell ya Don't worry, you're not the first he's called that. Welcome to the club
I think it’s valid when someone openly suggests that we let asylum seekers drown, right?
"I think he's entitled to his opinion that they don't have to get on a dinghy, he's right in that sense too. You're entitled to call him whatever you want, doubt he's too fussed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no basildon boy thinks im a cunt lol im crushed i tell ya Don't worry, you're not the first he's called that. Welcome to the club
I think it’s valid when someone openly suggests that we let asylum seekers drown, right?
I think he's entitled to his opinion that they don't have to get on a dinghy, he's right in that sense too.
"I don’t deny that they don’t have to get on a dinghy, but that’s not the part I take umbrage at. Is it a valid opinion that we should let asylum seekers drown in the channel, as the poster appears to suggest? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no basildon boy thinks im a cunt lol im crushed i tell ya Don't worry, you're not the first he's called that. Welcome to the club
I think it’s valid when someone openly suggests that we let asylum seekers drown, right?
I think he's entitled to his opinion that they don't have to get on a dinghy, he's right in that sense too.
I don’t deny that they don’t have to get on a dinghy, but that’s not the part I take umbrage at.
Is it a valid opinion that we should let asylum seekers drown in the channel, as the poster appears to suggest? "I don't hold that opinion but he's still entitled to it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no basildon boy thinks im a cunt lol im crushed i tell ya Don't worry, you're not the first he's called that. Welcome to the club
I think it’s valid when someone openly suggests that we let asylum seekers drown, right?
I think he's entitled to his opinion that they don't have to get on a dinghy, he's right in that sense too.
I don’t deny that they don’t have to get on a dinghy, but that’s not the part I take umbrage at.
Is it a valid opinion that we should let asylum seekers drown in the channel, as the poster appears to suggest?
I don't hold that opinion but he's still entitled to it. "Is a weird flex to defend such an odious view, though. But sure, there’s no law against holding such barbaric bad takes. Just as there’s no law against telling people that their views are hideous. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Oh no basildon boy thinks im a cunt lol im crushed i tell ya Don't worry, you're not the first he's called that. Welcome to the club
I think it’s valid when someone openly suggests that we let asylum seekers drown, right?
I think he's entitled to his opinion that they don't have to get on a dinghy, he's right in that sense too.
I don’t deny that they don’t have to get on a dinghy, but that’s not the part I take umbrage at.
Is it a valid opinion that we should let asylum seekers drown in the channel, as the poster appears to suggest?
I don't hold that opinion but he's still entitled to it.
Is a weird flex to defend such an odious view, though. But sure, there’s no law against holding such barbaric bad takes. Just as there’s no law against telling people that their views are hideous.
"I'm not defending his view. I'm defending his right to hold it, as you said there's no law stopping him. No one is flexing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
