FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

Sunak refused to condemn shooting of unarmed man waving white flag.

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

This useless excuse for someone who's supposed to condone international law, bombing houthis in the interest of freedom of navigation refused to to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag.

I thought kf seen everything now until that little shit stood at the despatch box and weaseled out of that.

He's a fucking disgrace to international law.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eachcplCouple
over a year ago

blackpool/preston/normandy france

Sunak is a little man who tries to come across as being a tough guy in the way he speaks and stares at cameras and people. He is a pathetic little person who makes you laugh when he is trying to be tough and appearing to be important, in his own mind.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesOfFilthMan
over a year ago

nearby

Uk is participating in the killing, maybe not directly but aiding with intelligence, surveillance and identifying targets.

All in our name paid by taxation.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Uk is participating in the killing, maybe not directly but aiding with intelligence, surveillance and identifying targets.

All in our name paid by taxation. "

All that money is going somewhere. Someone is getting very rich from this conflict.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

How is he a disgrace to international law?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *idnight RamblerMan
over a year ago

Pershore

If verified, this story is appalling. Supposedly an IDF sniper took out a man amongst an unarmed group with their arms raised and brandishing a white flag. That's not war, it's genocide. Sunak may be waiting for verification, but his silence is deafening.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Uk is participating in the killing, maybe not directly but aiding with intelligence, surveillance and identifying targets.

All in our name paid by taxation. "
finally a good use of are taxes then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oversfunCouple
over a year ago

city centre

He is a wee prick who needs a hard boot in the baws,fcking scumbag

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"Uk is participating in the killing, maybe not directly but aiding with intelligence, surveillance and identifying targets.

All in our name paid by taxation. finally a good use of are taxes then "

Killing unarmed civilians is a good use of our taxes?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"How is he a disgrace to international law?"

participating nations uphold the law... no governing body exists to explicitly enforce it.

Not calling for a ceacefire, refusing to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag,

Putting British personnel at risk to fix the symptoms and not the root cause of the middleast flare up.

Plus not blocking the import of goods marked as produce of isreal, when the goods have came from the illegal occupied territories .. land that Isreal stole from palistine while Isreal profits illegally from it.

The little shit is more interested in his personal investments with Isreal than international law.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Uk is participating in the killing, maybe not directly but aiding with intelligence, surveillance and identifying targets.

All in our name paid by taxation. finally a good use of are taxes then "

No wonder there's a recruitment crises with people like yourself.. are you happy risking pilots so you can have cheaper goods?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How is he a disgrace to international law?

participating nations uphold the law... no governing body exists to explicitly enforce it.

Not calling for a ceacefire, refusing to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag,

Putting British personnel at risk to fix the symptoms and not the root cause of the middleast flare up.

Plus not blocking the import of goods marked as produce of isreal, when the goods have came from the illegal occupied territories .. land that Isreal stole from palistine while Isreal profits illegally from it.

The little shit is more interested in his personal investments with Isreal than international law.

"

How is not calling for a ceasefire breaking international law?

How is what you describe murder according to international law?

No British personnel are at risk

Blockading Israeli goods on the other hand would be breaking international law

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iman2100Man
over a year ago

Glasgow

From what I saw of the shooting incident on TV a group of 5, apparently unarmed, men were walking towards the IDF front line with the aim of passing through to recover a relative from a bombed house.

From an IDF standpoint you do not want potential belligerents amongst you or behind you. You cannot hear what warnings were given by the IDF, but one should realise, when dealing with groups that use suicide bombers, allowing them near to you presents a real danger.

It is clearly wrong to shoot someone holding a white flag but it is also culpably stupid to approach a frightened and exitable enemy that does not want you near them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mateur100Man
over a year ago

nr faversham

You're assuming that everyone pays attention to the accepted rules of war. I would suggest you are naive in the extreme

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 24/01/24 22:04:35]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"How is he a disgrace to international law?

participating nations uphold the law... no governing body exists to explicitly enforce it.

Not calling for a ceacefire, refusing to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag,

Putting British personnel at risk to fix the symptoms and not the root cause of the middleast flare up.

Plus not blocking the import of goods marked as produce of isreal, when the goods have came from the illegal occupied territories .. land that Isreal stole from palistine while Isreal profits illegally from it.

The little shit is more interested in his personal investments with Isreal than international law.

How is not calling for a ceasefire breaking international law?

How is what you describe murder according to international law?

No British personnel are at risk

Blockading Israeli goods on the other hand would be breaking international law

"

That's right, water down the gravity of Sunak's behaviour , deflect and and defend him

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orses and PoniesMan
over a year ago

Ealing


"This useless excuse for someone who's supposed to condone international law, bombing houthis in the interest of freedom of navigation refused to to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag.

I thought kf seen everything now until that little shit stood at the despatch box and weaseled out of that.

He's a fucking disgrace to international law.

"
. Why would a UK pm get involved in this ?. Last time I checked he was pm of the UK . In any event he would need a lot of verified information in order to comment on the issue .At least he has played safe.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

He fence sat Pat, same as Starmer does same as they all do ..

Ignore the question by deflection or waffle on without committing..

Politics..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesOfFilthMan
over a year ago

nearby


"If verified, this story is appalling. Supposedly an IDF sniper took out a man amongst an unarmed group with their arms raised and brandishing a white flag. That's not war, it's genocide. Sunak may be waiting for verification, but his silence is deafening. "

“”Sunak says UK ‘proud’ to stand with Israel in ‘darkest hour’: ‘We want you to win’ “”

25,000+ dead civilians, half of them children.

One million+ homeless

Sunak is a clown

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *0shadesOfFilthMan
over a year ago

nearby


"

No British personnel are at risk

"

The British public are at risk when the next suicide bomber comes calling

7/7, London Bridge, Manchester etc. will happen again, brought on my UK prime ministers comments “ we hope you win”

Pop down Finsbury Park mosque and see what they think

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *resesse_MelioremCouple
over a year ago

Border of London


"

No British personnel are at risk

The British public are at risk when the next suicide bomber comes calling

7/7, London Bridge, Manchester etc. will happen again, brought on my UK prime ministers comments “ we hope you win”

Pop down Finsbury Park mosque and see what they think "

I.e. terrorism works.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uckoldDesiresMan
over a year ago

Dublin


"This useless excuse for someone who's supposed to condone international law, bombing houthis in the interest of freedom of navigation refused to to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag.

I thought kf seen everything now until that little shit stood at the despatch box and weaseled out of that.

He's a fucking disgrace to international law.

"

You don't get to be a UK PM or US President unless you dance to the tune of your Zionist puppeteers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *I TwoCouple
over a year ago

PDI 12-26th Nov 24

Was the shooter positively identified as IDF ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

No British personnel are at risk

The British public are at risk when the next suicide bomber comes calling

7/7, London Bridge, Manchester etc. will happen again, brought on my UK prime ministers comments “ we hope you win”

Pop down Finsbury Park mosque and see what they think "

I think we should all pop down to Finsbury Park with a few friends from Israel.We can hear them out and offer our rebuttal to their argument

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"This useless excuse for someone who's supposed to condone international law, bombing houthis in the interest of freedom of navigation refused to to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag.

I thought kf seen everything now until that little shit stood at the despatch box and weaseled out of that.

He's a fucking disgrace to international law.

. Why would a UK pm get involved in this ?. Last time I checked he was pm of the UK . In any event he would need a lot of verified information in order to comment on the issue .At least he has played safe. "

Because we can’t have it both ways. The UK is either a world power or it isn’t. We either have influence on the international stage or we don’t. We either want to play in the geopolitical space or we don’t. So which is it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton

[Removed by poster at 25/01/24 11:04:48]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"This useless excuse for someone who's supposed to condone international law, bombing houthis in the interest of freedom of navigation refused to to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag.

I thought kf seen everything now until that little shit stood at the despatch box and weaseled out of that.

He's a fucking disgrace to international law.

. Why would a UK pm get involved in this ?. Last time I checked he was pm of the UK . In any event he would need a lot of verified information in order to comment on the issue .At least he has played safe.

Because we can’t have it both ways. The UK is either a world power or it isn’t. We either have influence on the international stage or we don’t. We either want to play in the geopolitical space or we don’t. So which is it?"

We keep being told the UK are a laughing stock and have no power. The same people who tells us that want the PM to get involved in world situations. Can't have it both ways

BTW, why are we so desperate to have him answer a question to a situation that hasn't been verified? I know the answer.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"This useless excuse for someone who's supposed to condone international law, bombing houthis in the interest of freedom of navigation refused to to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag.

I thought kf seen everything now until that little shit stood at the despatch box and weaseled out of that.

He's a fucking disgrace to international law.

. Why would a UK pm get involved in this ?. Last time I checked he was pm of the UK . In any event he would need a lot of verified information in order to comment on the issue .At least he has played safe.

Because we can’t have it both ways. The UK is either a world power or it isn’t. We either have influence on the international stage or we don’t. We either want to play in the geopolitical space or we don’t. So which is it?"


"We keep being told the UK are a laughing stock and have no power. The same people who tells us that want the PM to get involved in world situations. Can't have it both ways "

The world isn’t binary Feisty! Who are these same people? You keep making these sweeping statements (in the ban extremist parties thread you were saying the “left” supported extreme regimes in the middle east). So I want to know who you are talking about?


"BTW, why are we so desperate to have him answer a question to a situation that hasn't been verified? I know the answer. "

I’m not, I was simply replying to Pat highlighting a broader point. Either the UK is a world leader and therefore comments in world affairs, or it doesn’t. Which is it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"This useless excuse for someone who's supposed to condone international law, bombing houthis in the interest of freedom of navigation refused to to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag.

I thought kf seen everything now until that little shit stood at the despatch box and weaseled out of that.

He's a fucking disgrace to international law.

. Why would a UK pm get involved in this ?. Last time I checked he was pm of the UK . In any event he would need a lot of verified information in order to comment on the issue .At least he has played safe.

Because we can’t have it both ways. The UK is either a world power or it isn’t. We either have influence on the international stage or we don’t. We either want to play in the geopolitical space or we don’t. So which is it?

We keep being told the UK are a laughing stock and have no power. The same people who tells us that want the PM to get involved in world situations. Can't have it both ways

The world isn’t binary Feisty! Who are these same people? You keep making these sweeping statements (in the ban extremist parties thread you were saying the “left” supported extreme regimes in the middle east). So I want to know who you are talking about?

"

You really have been walking round with your eyes closed haven't you.


"

BTW, why are we so desperate to have him answer a question to a situation that hasn't been verified? I know the answer.

I’m not, I was simply replying to Pat highlighting a broader point. Either the UK is a world leader and therefore comments in world affairs, or it doesn’t. Which is it?

"

This thread is about the PM not commenting. Why would he comment on an unverified story?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irldnCouple
over a year ago

Brighton


"You really have been walking round with your eyes closed haven't you."
possibly or perhaps I see more complexity than just “left” vs “right”

Have to say, until today I thought you did too? Maybe you are being groomed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *astandFeistyCouple
over a year ago

Bournemouth


"You really have been walking round with your eyes closed haven't you. possibly or perhaps I see more complexity than just “left” vs “right”

Have to say, until today I thought you did too? Maybe you are being groomed "

Because I used the word 'generally'

What you've done now is to try pigeon hole me, exactly what was happening to Sunak. I'm genuinely surprised you can't see that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orses and PoniesMan
over a year ago

Ealing


"This useless excuse for someone who's supposed to condone international law, bombing houthis in the interest of freedom of navigation refused to to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag.

I thought kf seen everything now until that little shit stood at the despatch box and weaseled out of that.

He's a fucking disgrace to international law.

. Why would a UK pm get involved in this ?. Last time I checked he was pm of the UK . In any event he would need a lot of verified information in order to comment on the issue .At least he has played safe.

Because we can’t have it both ways. The UK is either a world power or it isn’t. We either have influence on the international stage or we don’t. We either want to play in the geopolitical space or we don’t. So which is it?"
. Hello. Maybe you can answer the question on our behalf. ? For now I will just let the PM get on with the job on behalf of the MPs who selected him and the electorate who voted the party in. For now we can trust his judgement and the millions of hard working people in the UK. They are probably too busy contributing to society in order to think too much about issues such as this. Nurses taking care of the sick , the NHS looking after the health needs of the nation, civil servants providing the admin capacity, and public and private companies cresting the added value in society. Why would anyone be bothered about Rishi Sunak commenting on the topic. Is he even in possession of sufficient information to comment? How many other PMs throughout the world have commented . Maybe we should create a list and ask them why they choose to comment

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
over a year ago

golden fields


"This useless excuse for someone who's supposed to condone international law, bombing houthis in the interest of freedom of navigation refused to to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag.

I thought kf seen everything now until that little shit stood at the despatch box and weaseled out of that.

He's a fucking disgrace to international law.

. Why would a UK pm get involved in this ?. Last time I checked he was pm of the UK . In any event he would need a lot of verified information in order to comment on the issue .At least he has played safe.

Because we can’t have it both ways. The UK is either a world power or it isn’t. We either have influence on the international stage or we don’t. We either want to play in the geopolitical space or we don’t. So which is it?. Hello. Maybe you can answer the question on our behalf. ? For now I will just let the PM get on with the job on behalf of the MPs who selected him and the electorate who voted the party in. For now we can trust his judgement and the millions of hard working people in the UK. They are probably too busy contributing to society in order to think too much about issues such as this. Nurses taking care of the sick , the NHS looking after the health needs of the nation, civil servants providing the admin capacity, and public and private companies cresting the added value in society. Why would anyone be bothered about Rishi Sunak commenting on the topic. Is he even in possession of sufficient information to comment? How many other PMs throughout the world have commented . Maybe we should create a list and ask them why they choose to comment "

I agree. The electorate aren't paying attention. The government can get away with what the do because of the lack of engagement in the political processes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This useless excuse for someone who's supposed to condone international law, bombing houthis in the interest of freedom of navigation refused to to condemn the murder of an unarmed palisitinian waving a white flag.

I thought kf seen everything now until that little shit stood at the despatch box and weaseled out of that.

He's a fucking disgrace to international law.

. Why would a UK pm get involved in this ?. Last time I checked he was pm of the UK . In any event he would need a lot of verified information in order to comment on the issue .At least he has played safe.

Because we can’t have it both ways. The UK is either a world power or it isn’t. We either have influence on the international stage or we don’t. We either want to play in the geopolitical space or we don’t. So which is it?. Hello. Maybe you can answer the question on our behalf. ? For now I will just let the PM get on with the job on behalf of the MPs who selected him and the electorate who voted the party in. For now we can trust his judgement and the millions of hard working people in the UK. They are probably too busy contributing to society in order to think too much about issues such as this. Nurses taking care of the sick , the NHS looking after the health needs of the nation, civil servants providing the admin capacity, and public and private companies cresting the added value in society. Why would anyone be bothered about Rishi Sunak commenting on the topic. Is he even in possession of sufficient information to comment? How many other PMs throughout the world have commented . Maybe we should create a list and ask them why they choose to comment "

“The NHS looking after the health needs of the nation”.

Good one, I didn’t realise this was a comedy forum.

Good to see that the little ol’ private sector got a mention at the end, for the tiny bit it contributes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top