Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Politics |
| Jump to newest |  |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have a politics forum for this shit!!  "And you know that he cares not!!! T | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Going to win again? " I think he got knocked out in the quarter finals, Ronnie beat Ali carter in the final | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We have a politics forum for this shit!! "I thought this was about snooker? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's unclear at present if he'll even be eligible to run for president again as currently two states have ruled that his actions connected with the insurrection following his 2020 defeat rule him out constitutionally. Naturally, he's challenging this at the Supreme court, but should that court uphold the decisions of those states, the ban could therefore be applied across the remaining 48 states." The Supreme Court will go with Trump. The idea that some Democrat bureaucrat can decide which candidates should be able to stand in an election is patently absurd. And in any case the Republican states, and those that flip flop a bit wouldn’t ban him. Maybe Republican officials should ban all Democrats from standing for election. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's unclear at present if he'll even be eligible to run for president again as currently two states have ruled that his actions connected with the insurrection following his 2020 defeat rule him out constitutionally. Naturally, he's challenging this at the Supreme court, but should that court uphold the decisions of those states, the ban could therefore be applied across the remaining 48 states. The Supreme Court will go with Trump. The idea that some Democrat bureaucrat can decide which candidates should be able to stand in an election is patently absurd. And in any case the Republican states, and those that flip flop a bit wouldn’t ban him. Maybe Republican officials should ban all Democrats from standing for election." Don't give the muva pluckers ideas.   | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Going to win again? " They were stupid enough to vote for him the first time, I'm sure they could again. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he runs then yes probably, must admit there isa part of me that wants him to win, last time he was in i thought it was hysterically funny how people compleatly lost there shit about him winning, ya never know this time round all those celebs that said they would leave the country might actually do it this time" The people who lost their shit about Trump winning in 2016 were dwarfed by the far greater amount who lost their shit when Trump lost. So, logically Trump losing again would be better? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he runs then yes probably, must admit there isa part of me that wants him to win, last time he was in i thought it was hysterically funny how people compleatly lost there shit about him winning, ya never know this time round all those celebs that said they would leave the country might actually do it this time The people who lost their shit about Trump winning in 2016 were dwarfed by the far greater amount who lost their shit when Trump lost. So, logically Trump losing again would be better?" yea but the ones who lost there shit about him losing were no where near as funny as those who freaked out about him winning | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he runs then yes probably, must admit there isa part of me that wants him to win, last time he was in i thought it was hysterically funny how people compleatly lost there shit about him winning, ya never know this time round all those celebs that said they would leave the country might actually do it this time The people who lost their shit about Trump winning in 2016 were dwarfed by the far greater amount who lost their shit when Trump lost. So, logically Trump losing again would be better?yea but the ones who lost there shit about him losing were no where near as funny as those who freaked out about him winning" Walking around with signs "we the people fuck Joe Biden" or wearing fancy dress and storming the capital building was pretty ridiculous. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he runs then yes probably, must admit there isa part of me that wants him to win, last time he was in i thought it was hysterically funny how people compleatly lost there shit about him winning, ya never know this time round all those celebs that said they would leave the country might actually do it this time The people who lost their shit about Trump winning in 2016 were dwarfed by the far greater amount who lost their shit when Trump lost. So, logically Trump losing again would be better?yea but the ones who lost there shit about him losing were no where near as funny as those who freaked out about him winning Walking around with signs "we the people fuck Joe Biden" or wearing fancy dress and storming the capital building was pretty ridiculous." The interview 'Elizabeth from Knoxville' gave was one of the funniest there has ever been. And the QAnon Shaman. And the people who triumphantly spread their faces all over social media only for that content to send them to jail. And there was Katherine Schwab, a woman who took a private flight to take part and she received a 60-day prison sentence. It was as if people had completely taken leave of their senses. The sheer stupidity of it all was breathtaking. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he runs then yes probably, must admit there isa part of me that wants him to win, last time he was in i thought it was hysterically funny how people compleatly lost there shit about him winning, ya never know this time round all those celebs that said they would leave the country might actually do it this time The people who lost their shit about Trump winning in 2016 were dwarfed by the far greater amount who lost their shit when Trump lost. So, logically Trump losing again would be better?yea but the ones who lost there shit about him losing were no where near as funny as those who freaked out about him winning Walking around with signs "we the people fuck Joe Biden" or wearing fancy dress and storming the capital building was pretty ridiculous. The interview 'Elizabeth from Knoxville' gave was one of the funniest there has ever been. And the QAnon Shaman. And the people who triumphantly spread their faces all over social media only for that content to send them to jail. And there was Katherine Schwab, a woman who took a private flight to take part and she received a 60-day prison sentence. It was as if people had completely taken leave of their senses. The sheer stupidity of it all was breathtaking." of you think that was an insurection i feel sorry for you, not armed let in by security and as for the shaman they were showing him round lol, an insurection would of been burning the place down and getting hold of the politicians, ive seen more rowdy get togethers in central london  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's unclear at present if he'll even be eligible to run for president again as currently two states have ruled that his actions connected with the insurrection following his 2020 defeat rule him out constitutionally. Naturally, he's challenging this at the Supreme court, but should that court uphold the decisions of those states, the ban could therefore be applied across the remaining 48 states. The Supreme Court will go with Trump. The idea that some Democrat bureaucrat can decide which candidates should be able to stand in an election is patently absurd. " A) The Supreme Court may let him stand for now…however if/when he is convicted in the January 6th case, you can bet this will be revisited and end up back at the Supreme Court B) it’s not democratic bureaucrats that will decide who runs.. it’s the constitution.. you know, you must be over 35! You must be born in the United States! you must not engage in, or give aid and comfort to those engaging in insurrection! That sort of thing! That last one… pretty easy not to do!!! " And in any case the Republican states, and those that flip flop a bit wouldn’t ban him. " Now yes… after the conviction… I don’t know if I’d be making that bet! " Maybe Republican officials should ban all Democrats from standing for election." If you can find me a democrat who has engaged in, or given aid or comfort to someone who participated in an insurrection then I am right there with you!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 he coming. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming. "This made me laugh! It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At least it will make for some good argum...oops...discussion on here "Balanced and objective I am sure. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"At least it will make for some good argum...oops...discussion on here
Balanced and objective I am sure. "Fuck that, where’s the fun in a balanced discussion? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work "Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How do we feel about probity in public office? Moral principles, honesty, decency, that kind of thing?" The electorate here and over there don't seem to give a fuck about any of those things. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?"Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration. Given the choice between that and someone who actually knows what he is doing, and whose policies were actually of economic benefit to the US and wider world, then yes I’d much rather have Trump even if he does say some things on social media that left liberals have to pretend to find offensive. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration. ." Clinton’s back? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration.
Given the choice between that and someone who actually knows what he is doing, and whose policies were actually of economic benefit to the US and wider world, then yes I’d much rather have Trump even if he does say some things on social media that left liberals have to pretend to find offensive."I love the way right wing roger likes to call Biden senile…. Conveniently forgetting that trump is only 2 years younger than Biden… Also… roger… have you seen a trump speech lately????
Also… I’d step back on those “creeping around young girls” allegations… since you might want to check some of the reported about how trump acted around girls at Miss “Teen USA” pageants……
Anyway trumps 2nd defamation case starts this week against E Jean Carroll.. so let’s see how much is blown this time bearing in mind the first case cost him 8 million dollars! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration.
Given the choice between that and someone who actually knows what he is doing, and whose policies were actually of economic benefit to the US and wider world, then yes I’d much rather have Trump even if he does say some things on social media that left liberals have to pretend to find offensive."I did not ask about Biden. I asked about Trump. I agree re Biden. He should retire, today! But my question stands about Trump. Seems like you are saying the USA only has a choice between a doddery old man and a slightly younger but still old dodgy guy. Why can’t Reps and Dems come up with a decent candidate? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration.
Given the choice between that and someone who actually knows what he is doing, and whose policies were actually of economic benefit to the US and wider world, then yes I’d much rather have Trump even if he does say some things on social media that left liberals have to pretend to find offensive.
I love the way right wing roger likes to call Biden senile…. Conveniently forgetting that trump is only 2 years younger than Biden…
Also… roger… have you seen a trump speech lately????
Also… I’d step back on those “creeping around young girls” allegations… since you might want to check some of the reported about how trump acted around girls at Miss “Teen USA” pageants……
Anyway trumps 2nd defamation case starts this week against E Jean Carroll.. so let’s see how much is blown this time bearing in mind the first case cost him 8 million dollars! "The Forum’s resident Biden apologist speaks…. How are those polls looking? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration.
"And yet he is still better than Trump. " Given the choice between that and someone who actually knows what he is doing, and whose policies were actually of economic benefit to the US and wider world, then yes I’d much rather have Trump " You seem to have mixed up Trump with someone competent. " even if he does say some things on social media that left liberals have to pretend to find offensive." Why are only "left liberals" offended by glorifying sexual assault and encouraging race hate crimes? Such a bizarre and offensive outlook towards anyone on the right. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A creepy child sniffer who has lost his marbles or a grab em by the pussy kind of guy. Only one way to decide. Fight! " Hopefully a double KO and a proper human can take over. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he runs then yes probably, must admit there isa part of me that wants him to win, last time he was in i thought it was hysterically funny how people compleatly lost there shit about him winning, ya never know this time round all those celebs that said they would leave the country might actually do it this time The people who lost their shit about Trump winning in 2016 were dwarfed by the far greater amount who lost their shit when Trump lost. So, logically Trump losing again would be better?yea but the ones who lost there shit about him losing were no where near as funny as those who freaked out about him winning Walking around with signs "we the people fuck Joe Biden" or wearing fancy dress and storming the capital building was pretty ridiculous. The interview 'Elizabeth from Knoxville' gave was one of the funniest there has ever been. And the QAnon Shaman. And the people who triumphantly spread their faces all over social media only for that content to send them to jail. And there was Katherine Schwab, a woman who took a private flight to take part and she received a 60-day prison sentence. It was as if people had completely taken leave of their senses. The sheer stupidity of it all was breathtaking.of you think that was an insurection i feel sorry for you, not armed let in by security and as for the shaman they were showing him round lol, an insurection would of been burning the place down and getting hold of the politicians, ive seen more rowdy get togethers in central london "Did I use the word insurrection? I was pointing out why it was funnier. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A creepy child sniffer who has lost his marbles or a grab em by the pussy kind of guy. Only one way to decide. Fight! " I think the problem is that while nobody could be comfortable with a weird child sniffer, there are plenty of closet misogynists who hear Trump’s ramblings and think “hell yeah!” He certainly has wide appeal but that includes incels and Andrew Tate style worshippers. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration.
And yet he is still better than Trump.
Given the choice between that and someone who actually knows what he is doing, and whose policies were actually of economic benefit to the US and wider world, then yes I’d much rather have Trump
You seem to have mixed up Trump with someone competent.
even if he does say some things on social media that left liberals have to pretend to find offensive.
Why are only "left liberals" offended by glorifying sexual assault and encouraging race hate crimes? Such a bizarre and offensive outlook towards anyone on the right. "Absolutely shocked and outraged at all the faux outrage in your post. You forgot to mention “tHe ScIeNcE”. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration.
And yet he is still better than Trump.
Given the choice between that and someone who actually knows what he is doing, and whose policies were actually of economic benefit to the US and wider world, then yes I’d much rather have Trump
You seem to have mixed up Trump with someone competent.
even if he does say some things on social media that left liberals have to pretend to find offensive.
Why are only "left liberals" offended by glorifying sexual assault and encouraging race hate crimes? Such a bizarre and offensive outlook towards anyone on the right.
Absolutely shocked and outraged at all the faux outrage in your post.
You forgot to mention “tHe ScIeNcE”."I didn't express outrage, nor faux outrage. I commented on your underhanded insults toward right wingers. Is there a science element to the conversation? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration.
Given the choice between that and someone who actually knows what he is doing, and whose policies were actually of economic benefit to the US and wider world, then yes I’d much rather have Trump even if he does say some things on social media that left liberals have to pretend to find offensive."Trump does plenty of creeping on young girls himself. Remember when he said in an interview that his daughter was beautiful and if they weren't related he'd date her?
And speaking of cancel culture, you don't get much worse than inciting riots and violence when you don't like that you haven't been re-elected under the very same system you were happy to support when you WERE elected. The bloke's a nightmare, and the majority of his supporters aren't much better. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Going to win again? " He has got a very good chance. He may be an unsavoury character but it's looking more and more likely that the Democratic Party are going to stick with Biden. Unless of course Biden falls under a bus or is incapacitated one way or another. Against Biden I think Trump will win and even with Biden out of the way I don't think Harris could beat him either. Whatever happens it's democracy and the American people have the right to choose their own president. Whether we like it or not. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration.
Given the choice between that and someone who actually knows what he is doing, and whose policies were actually of economic benefit to the US and wider world, then yes I’d much rather have Trump even if he does say some things on social media that left liberals have to pretend to find offensive.
I love the way right wing roger likes to call Biden senile…. Conveniently forgetting that trump is only 2 years younger than Biden…
Also… roger… have you seen a trump speech lately????
Also… I’d step back on those “creeping around young girls” allegations… since you might want to check some of the reported about how trump acted around girls at Miss “Teen USA” pageants……
Anyway trumps 2nd defamation case starts this week against E Jean Carroll.. so let’s see how much is blown this time bearing in mind the first case cost him 8 million dollars!
The Forum’s resident Biden apologist speaks….
How are those polls looking?"Not worried about them actually.. once the federal court case starts the poll numbers will take care of themselves…jail will kinda do that and the attacks ads write themselves! You call me a Biden apologist.. you must have selective amnesia where I said I think that Nikki Haley would beat Biden, but trump and desantis don’t! And I don’t think Biden would have run if trump had not of run! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Good point. Trump heard people talking about “cancel culture” and said “hold my beer I can trump that” then tried to cancel a democratic election result!" Trump is the undisputed heavyweight champion of cancel culture. If you Google "business trump tried to cancel" you'll find various lists and articles with all the people and businesses he tried to cancel and who he called for boycotts against. Americans want to vote for a man who tried to cancel American businesses. Sometimes it feels like we live in a simulation. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?"What has your question got to do with me saying it must be a progressives nightmare when the cancel button doesn’t work? Do you think a progressive is okay without the cancel button? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he runs then yes probably, must admit there isa part of me that wants him to win, last time he was in i thought it was hysterically funny how people compleatly lost there shit about him winning, ya never know this time round all those celebs that said they would leave the country might actually do it this time The people who lost their shit about Trump winning in 2016 were dwarfed by the far greater amount who lost their shit when Trump lost. So, logically Trump losing again would be better?yea but the ones who lost there shit about him losing were no where near as funny as those who freaked out about him winning Walking around with signs "we the people fuck Joe Biden" or wearing fancy dress and storming the capital building was pretty ridiculous. The interview 'Elizabeth from Knoxville' gave was one of the funniest there has ever been. And the QAnon Shaman. And the people who triumphantly spread their faces all over social media only for that content to send them to jail. And there was Katherine Schwab, a woman who took a private flight to take part and she received a 60-day prison sentence. It was as if people had completely taken leave of their senses. The sheer stupidity of it all was breathtaking.of you think that was an insurection i feel sorry for you, not armed let in by security and as for the shaman they were showing him round lol, an insurection would of been burning the place down and getting hold of the politicians, ive seen more rowdy get togethers in central london "We all saw the images, so know that your account of what happened is fantasy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
Well the “most powerful job on the planet” as you put it (increasingly this doesn’t appear to be the case) is currently being done by a senile old man who is a serial fantasist about his own past, whose family seems to be some giant crime syndicate, who creeps around young girls, who regularly falls over and can’t string a coherent sentence together, and whose self evident weakness is bringing the world to the brink of another major conflagration.
Given the choice between that and someone who actually knows what he is doing, and whose policies were actually of economic benefit to the US and wider world, then yes I’d much rather have Trump even if he does say some things on social media that left liberals have to pretend to find offensive.
I love the way right wing roger likes to call Biden senile…. Conveniently forgetting that trump is only 2 years younger than Biden…
Also… roger… have you seen a trump speech lately????
Also… I’d step back on those “creeping around young girls” allegations… since you might want to check some of the reported about how trump acted around girls at Miss “Teen USA” pageants……
Anyway trumps 2nd defamation case starts this week against E Jean Carroll.. so let’s see how much is blown this time bearing in mind the first case cost him 8 million dollars!
The Forum’s resident Biden apologist speaks….
How are those polls looking?
Not worried about them actually.. once the federal court case starts the poll numbers will take care of themselves…jail will kinda do that and the attacks ads write themselves!
You call me a Biden apologist.. you must have selective amnesia where I said I think that Nikki Haley would beat Biden, but trump and desantis don’t! And I don’t think Biden would have run if trump had not of run! "Agreed. If the republicans want to win, then backing Haley would be the smart move. I’m not sure they will though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If he runs then yes probably, must admit there isa part of me that wants him to win, last time he was in i thought it was hysterically funny how people compleatly lost there shit about him winning, ya never know this time round all those celebs that said they would leave the country might actually do it this time The people who lost their shit about Trump winning in 2016 were dwarfed by the far greater amount who lost their shit when Trump lost. So, logically Trump losing again would be better?yea but the ones who lost there shit about him losing were no where near as funny as those who freaked out about him winning Walking around with signs "we the people fuck Joe Biden" or wearing fancy dress and storming the capital building was pretty ridiculous. The interview 'Elizabeth from Knoxville' gave was one of the funniest there has ever been. And the QAnon Shaman. And the people who triumphantly spread their faces all over social media only for that content to send them to jail. And there was Katherine Schwab, a woman who took a private flight to take part and she received a 60-day prison sentence. It was as if people had completely taken leave of their senses. The sheer stupidity of it all was breathtaking.of you think that was an insurection i feel sorry for you, not armed let in by security and as for the shaman they were showing him round lol, an insurection would of been burning the place down and getting hold of the politicians, ive seen more rowdy get togethers in central london
We all saw the images, so know that your account of what happened is fantasy. "ive been in the middle of a lot worse in the late 90s on may day protests,so u didnt see security opening doors to the capitol or them showing the bloke around in his viking hat, handfull of nut jobs out of thousands, the amount of people there if it had been a proper riot there would of been a lot more damage and a lot more injuries, um guessing you have never been in the middle of large scale disorder and no not fantasy just watching on tv what i saw with my own eyes, was rather entertaining more than anything, and why are you so botherd about trump? You dont live in the u.s so not gona really affect your life, myself im enjoying watching the american people getting more and more split | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
What has your question got to do with me saying it must be a progressives nightmare when the cancel button doesn’t work?
Do you think a progressive is okay without the cancel button? "I will answer your question if you first answer mine! Only fair! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
What has your question got to do with me saying it must be a progressives nightmare when the cancel button doesn’t work?
Do you think a progressive is okay without the cancel button? "The thing about cancel culture is that when it comes to trump, he is very quick at claiming to be a victim, but he is also good at trying to get other people cancelled… case in point would be then ESPN presenter jamele hill after she called him various stuff on Twitter Or the NFL football players who were “taking the knee “ It’s not just progressive that try to get stuff cancelled…. See the story about bud light! See how people tried to get nike cancelled after they teamed up with Colin kaepernick | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
What has your question got to do with me saying it must be a progressives nightmare when the cancel button doesn’t work?
Do you think a progressive is okay without the cancel button?
The thing about cancel culture is that when it comes to trump, he is very quick at claiming to be a victim, but he is also good at trying to get other people cancelled… case in point would be then ESPN presenter jamele hill after she called him various stuff on Twitter
Or the NFL football players who were “taking the knee “
It’s not just progressive that try to get stuff cancelled…. See the story about bud light! See how people tried to get nike cancelled after they teamed up with Colin kaepernick "Shhhh! Some people think cancel culture only works one way! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
What has your question got to do with me saying it must be a progressives nightmare when the cancel button doesn’t work?
Do you think a progressive is okay without the cancel button?
The thing about cancel culture is that when it comes to trump, he is very quick at claiming to be a victim, but he is also good at trying to get other people cancelled… case in point would be then ESPN presenter jamele hill after she called him various stuff on Twitter
Or the NFL football players who were “taking the knee “
It’s not just progressive that try to get stuff cancelled…. See the story about bud light! See how people tried to get nike cancelled after they teamed up with Colin kaepernick
Shhhh! Some people think cancel culture only works one way!"Cancel Culture definitely works both ways, see Gary Lineker. On Trump, did he call for Jamele Hill to be sacked or Nike to be boycotted? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Make America Great Again Again" When was it last made great? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump is a gigantic POS, offering nothing but chaos and division - if that appeals to you because you like the idea of constant chaos and making hate figures out of minorities, then you’re no better than he is " Biden promised reconciliation and that’s what he has delivered. The US today is such a harmonious place. No division in sight. Just one big happy family. It does also make one wonder why these minorities who Trump hates so much seem increasingly to be voting for him. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... " Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election "???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk "Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days. Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like. “Simple politics for simple people.” | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”"Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections."Not really when the majority are as thick as shit | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit "Bloody working class tax payers  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit "It comes down to the fielding of uninspiring candidates. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit "Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Bloody working class tax payers "Just being provocative but emotive language aside it is demonstrably true that fewer people are intelligent than not intelligent (and it varies depending on where you draw the line). | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing. "I thought you liked Trump? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?"I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Look busy Libs he coming.
This made me laugh!
It must be a progressives nightmare, when the cancel button doesn't work
Serious question...even if you completely agree with Trump’s policies, doesn’t his personal attributes and history bother you in the slightest? Is the man who declared “grab them by the pussy” and such really the type of person you want to hold the most powerful job on the planet?
What has your question got to do with me saying it must be a progressives nightmare when the cancel button doesn’t work?
Do you think a progressive is okay without the cancel button?
The thing about cancel culture is that when it comes to trump, he is very quick at claiming to be a victim, but he is also good at trying to get other people cancelled… case in point would be then ESPN presenter jamele hill after she called him various stuff on Twitter
Or the NFL football players who were “taking the knee “
It’s not just progressive that try to get stuff cancelled…. See the story about bud light! See how people tried to get nike cancelled after they teamed up with Colin kaepernick "It is predominantly the progressive liberals that thrive on cancel culture and genuinely love the pseudo power trips of self righteous correction they try to administer on those who do not comply. Comedy, free thought and speech to name a few are dying because of these people.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cancel Culture definitely works both ways, see Gary Lineker. On Trump, did he call for Jamele Hill to be sacked or Nike to be boycotted?" Actually… yes he did! And he definitely said the NFL should be boycotted if players kept taking the knee…. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”"A little bit of bigotry, never hurt anyone  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing. "Making poor life choices because you can’t think for longer than half a second ends up much worse. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cancel Culture definitely works both ways, see Gary Lineker. On Trump, did he call for Jamele Hill to be sacked or Nike to be boycotted? Actually… yes he did! And he definitely said the NFL should be boycotted if players kept taking the knee…." I'm not sure he said the NFL should be boycotted, he said leave the stadium if they see a player taking the knee during the national anthem. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth."I so know you would try to turn it into a Brexit blast… so predictable!!! One trick pony ROH! Actually those 3 people have something else in common that may have gone over your head as it’s a bit more nuanced I find it interesting how a merchant bank who has stiffed people thru expenses, a millionaire who has stiffed people his entire business life, and a millionaire who so British his businesses are based in Bermuda to not pay uk taxes… all claim to be speaking for the common people!! Have you noticed that the biggest beneficiaries of their economy programs are always people like them! …… | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cancel Culture definitely works both ways, see Gary Lineker. On Trump, did he call for Jamele Hill to be sacked or Nike to be boycotted? Actually… yes he did! And he definitely said the NFL should be boycotted if players kept taking the knee…." What do you mean Actually...? There's a reason I asked a question. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cancel Culture definitely works both ways, see Gary Lineker. On Trump, did he call for Jamele Hill to be sacked or Nike to be boycotted? Actually… yes he did! And he definitely said the NFL should be boycotted if players kept taking the knee…. What do you mean Actually...? There's a reason I asked a question." That is then my writing style…. Yes he did! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cancel Culture definitely works both ways, see Gary Lineker. On Trump, did he call for Jamele Hill to be sacked or Nike to be boycotted? Actually… yes he did! And he definitely said the NFL should be boycotted if players kept taking the knee…. What do you mean Actually...? There's a reason I asked a question. That is then my writing style…. Yes he did!" Was it Trump who said should be fired, or a Whitehouse spokesperson? Also, did Trump call for a boycott of Nike or did he say it is no wonder people are boycotting Nike? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth."What’s the truth Rog? I know it’s out there, according to the X-Files | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
I so know you would try to turn it into a Brexit blast… so predictable!!! One trick pony ROH!
Actually those 3 people have something else in common that may have gone over your head as it’s a bit more nuanced
I find it interesting how a merchant bank who has stiffed people thru expenses, a millionaire who has stiffed people his entire business life, and a millionaire who so British his businesses are based in Bermuda to not pay uk taxes… all claim to be speaking for the common people!!
Have you noticed that the biggest beneficiaries of their economy programs are always people like them! ……"Omg yes Biden family, Clintons both , Obamas both, Pelosi. Like they’ve made no money at all while they’ve been in politics. Just so altruistic! Never stop thinking about the poor! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Cancel Culture definitely works both ways, see Gary Lineker. On Trump, did he call for Jamele Hill to be sacked or Nike to be boycotted? Actually… yes he did! And he definitely said the NFL should be boycotted if players kept taking the knee…. What do you mean Actually...? There's a reason I asked a question. That is then my writing style…. Yes he did!" I remember him saying he'd love an NFL player to be fired. And that people should leave the stadium if they don't like the knee gesture. This was said for 'disrespecting the flag of the US'. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
I so know you would try to turn it into a Brexit blast… so predictable!!! One trick pony ROH!
Actually those 3 people have something else in common that may have gone over your head as it’s a bit more nuanced
I find it interesting how a merchant bank who has stiffed people thru expenses, a millionaire who has stiffed people his entire business life, and a millionaire who so British his businesses are based in Bermuda to not pay uk taxes… all claim to be speaking for the common people!!
Have you noticed that the biggest beneficiaries of their economy programs are always people like them! ……
Omg yes Biden family, Clintons both , Obamas both, Pelosi. Like they’ve made no money at all while they’ve been in politics. Just so altruistic! Never stop thinking about the poor!"Insider trader Pelosi, milking it from every angle since 1963 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
What’s the truth Rog? I know it’s out there, according to the X-Files "The truth is.... "Not really when the majority are as thick as shit" attitude. I've said this since day one. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shock horror reality check = some politicians regardless of their political allegiance are self enriching arseholes. Not all but certainly some. However, that doesn’t stop “Mr” Trump from being a worthless cunt "What provoked this? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
What’s the truth Rog? I know it’s out there, according to the X-Files
The truth is....
"Not really when the majority are as thick as shit" attitude. I've said this since day one. "Without a doubt one of the key weaknesses in the Remain campaign was to patronise and lecture. So many people simply voted Leave as a protest vote against that rolled up sleeve wearing Eton educated smug rich boy Cameron as much as having any real conviction or belief/understanding what they were voting for. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shock horror reality check = some politicians regardless of their political allegiance are self enriching arseholes. Not all but certainly some. However, that doesn’t stop “Mr” Trump from being a worthless cunt
What provoked this?"Jumping in as the whataboutism started to kick off. The topic is Trump and yet here we are talking about how shit and self serving other politicians are! Like “no shit Sherlock!” | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
What’s the truth Rog? I know it’s out there, according to the X-Files
The truth is....
"Not really when the majority are as thick as shit" attitude. I've said this since day one.
Without a doubt one of the key weaknesses in the Remain campaign was to patronise and lecture. So many people simply voted Leave as a protest vote against that rolled up sleeve wearing Eton educated smug rich boy Cameron as much as having any real conviction or belief/understanding what they were voting for. "I'm absolutely convinced that protest vote is what lost the referendum for Remain. And yet, so many remainers still continue in the same vein. Who's thick? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shock horror reality check = some politicians regardless of their political allegiance are self enriching arseholes. Not all but certainly some. However, that doesn’t stop “Mr” Trump from being a worthless cunt
What provoked this?
Jumping in as the whataboutism started to kick off. The topic is Trump and yet here we are talking about how shit and self serving other politicians are! Like “no shit Sherlock!”"You seem uncharacteristically angry, considering you supported whataboutism further up the thread... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
What’s the truth Rog? I know it’s out there, according to the X-Files
The truth is....
"Not really when the majority are as thick as shit" attitude. I've said this since day one.
Without a doubt one of the key weaknesses in the Remain campaign was to patronise and lecture. So many people simply voted Leave as a protest vote against that rolled up sleeve wearing Eton educated smug rich boy Cameron as much as having any real conviction or belief/understanding what they were voting for.
I'm absolutely convinced that protest vote is what lost the referendum for Remain.
And yet, so many remainers still continue in the same vein. Who's thick?"Fair point. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shock horror reality check = some politicians regardless of their political allegiance are self enriching arseholes. Not all but certainly some. However, that doesn’t stop “Mr” Trump from being a worthless cunt
What provoked this?
Jumping in as the whataboutism started to kick off. The topic is Trump and yet here we are talking about how shit and self serving other politicians are! Like “no shit Sherlock!”
You seem uncharacteristically angry, considering you supported whataboutism further up the thread..."I am being contrary and provocative just for the fun of it. Not angry  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shock horror reality check = some politicians regardless of their political allegiance are self enriching arseholes. Not all but certainly some. However, that doesn’t stop “Mr” Trump from being a worthless cunt "Have you considered the following argument. "What about Biden". Checkmate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shock horror reality check = some politicians regardless of their political allegiance are self enriching arseholes. Not all but certainly some. However, that doesn’t stop “Mr” Trump from being a worthless cunt
Have you considered the following argument.
"What about Biden".
Checkmate."Was that a mic drop | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shock horror reality check = some politicians regardless of their political allegiance are self enriching arseholes. Not all but certainly some. However, that doesn’t stop “Mr” Trump from being a worthless cunt
Have you considered the following argument.
"What about Biden".
Checkmate.
Was that a mic drop "Satirical mic drop. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Shock horror reality check = some politicians regardless of their political allegiance are self enriching arseholes. Not all but certainly some. However, that doesn’t stop “Mr” Trump from being a worthless cunt
Have you considered the following argument.
"What about Biden".
Checkmate.
Was that a mic drop "It was a good mic, a great mic, probably the best mic ever, and I should know as it was my mic and I know what makes a mic great again! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
What’s the truth Rog? I know it’s out there, according to the X-Files
The truth is....
"Not really when the majority are as thick as shit" attitude. I've said this since day one.
Without a doubt one of the key weaknesses in the Remain campaign was to patronise and lecture. So many people simply voted Leave as a protest vote against that rolled up sleeve wearing Eton educated smug rich boy Cameron as much as having any real conviction or belief/understanding what they were voting for. "That doesn’t really explain why they voted with the other Old Etonian Boris though does it? The Remain campaign was complacent and focused too much on economics. They failed to understand that the population doesn’t see the EU purely as an economic venture. They made little effort to talk to people on the ground. They were virtually invisible at grass roots level. Fundamentally Remoaners don’t actually understand the country they live in. But oddly enough they’ve continued in the same vein since they lost. Hectoring people who don’t agree with them as being thick, focusing totally on economics, boring everyone with endless self interested reports about how terrible Brexit has been for the economy. It’s almost as if they think that saying the same thing every day for eight years despite people having made clear that they don’t really care somehow means it must be right. I think there was also a significant degree of personal humiliation for the Remoaners. Overwhelmingly from the metropolitan managerial class they simply weren’t used to anyone saying no to them. They haven’t been able to cope with not getting their way so the country has been subjected to a seven year hissy fit. And they’ve really got no idea why they even wanted to stay in the EU or what’s going on in the EU now. Most of them probably never thought about the EU before 2016. It’s just a high status opinion that compensates for their own social insecurities. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Going to win again? They were stupid enough to vote for him the first time, I'm sure they could again. " The Democrats are stupid enough to put Biden up again. May as well gifted it Trump | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
What’s the truth Rog? I know it’s out there, according to the X-Files
The truth is....
"Not really when the majority are as thick as shit" attitude. I've said this since day one.
Without a doubt one of the key weaknesses in the Remain campaign was to patronise and lecture. So many people simply voted Leave as a protest vote against that rolled up sleeve wearing Eton educated smug rich boy Cameron as much as having any real conviction or belief/understanding what they were voting for.
That doesn’t really explain why they voted with the other Old Etonian Boris though does it?
The Remain campaign was complacent and focused too much on economics. They failed to understand that the population doesn’t see the EU purely as an economic venture.
They made little effort to talk to people on the ground. They were virtually invisible at grass roots level. Fundamentally Remoaners don’t actually understand the country they live in.
But oddly enough they’ve continued in the same vein since they lost. Hectoring people who don’t agree with them as being thick, focusing totally on economics, boring everyone with endless self interested reports about how terrible Brexit has been for the economy.
It’s almost as if they think that saying the same thing every day for eight years despite people having made clear that they don’t really care somehow means it must be right.
I think there was also a significant degree of personal humiliation for the Remoaners. Overwhelmingly from the metropolitan managerial class they simply weren’t used to anyone saying no to them. They haven’t been able to cope with not getting their way so the country has been subjected to a seven year hissy fit. And they’ve really got no idea why they even wanted to stay in the EU or what’s going on in the EU now. Most of them probably never thought about the EU before 2016. It’s just a high status opinion that compensates for their own social insecurities."Way to attempt to hijack a thread there right!!!!! I’m going to go back to talking about trump vs e Jean Carroll part 2 in federal court today… So how much does his mouth cost him in defamation this time Rog? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
What’s the truth Rog? I know it’s out there, according to the X-Files
The truth is....
"Not really when the majority are as thick as shit" attitude. I've said this since day one.
Without a doubt one of the key weaknesses in the Remain campaign was to patronise and lecture. So many people simply voted Leave as a protest vote against that rolled up sleeve wearing Eton educated smug rich boy Cameron as much as having any real conviction or belief/understanding what they were voting for.
That doesn’t really explain why they voted with the other Old Etonian Boris though does it?
The Remain campaign was complacent and focused too much on economics. They failed to understand that the population doesn’t see the EU purely as an economic venture.
They made little effort to talk to people on the ground. They were virtually invisible at grass roots level. Fundamentally Remoaners don’t actually understand the country they live in.
But oddly enough they’ve continued in the same vein since they lost. Hectoring people who don’t agree with them as being thick, focusing totally on economics, boring everyone with endless self interested reports about how terrible Brexit has been for the economy.
It’s almost as if they think that saying the same thing every day for eight years despite people having made clear that they don’t really care somehow means it must be right.
I think there was also a significant degree of personal humiliation for the Remoaners. Overwhelmingly from the metropolitan managerial class they simply weren’t used to anyone saying no to them. They haven’t been able to cope with not getting their way so the country has been subjected to a seven year hissy fit. And they’ve really got no idea why they even wanted to stay in the EU or what’s going on in the EU now. Most of them probably never thought about the EU before 2016. It’s just a high status opinion that compensates for their own social insecurities."Really well put | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m going to go back to talking about trump vs e Jean Carroll part 2 in federal court today… So how much does his mouth cost him in defamation this time Rog?" Her lawyers are asking for $10m. Trump gets to be top news item on every station across the USA, in the run up to an election, for just $10m. Most of the electorate have already made their minds up whether they'll vote for him, or for the other bloke. Trump is targeting the floating voters, and when they get to the voting booth, all they're going to remember is that they've heard a lot about Trump, but nothing about the other guy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
What’s the truth Rog? I know it’s out there, according to the X-Files
The truth is....
"Not really when the majority are as thick as shit" attitude. I've said this since day one.
Without a doubt one of the key weaknesses in the Remain campaign was to patronise and lecture. So many people simply voted Leave as a protest vote against that rolled up sleeve wearing Eton educated smug rich boy Cameron as much as having any real conviction or belief/understanding what they were voting for.
That doesn’t really explain why they voted with the other Old Etonian Boris though does it?
The Remain campaign was complacent and focused too much on economics. They failed to understand that the population doesn’t see the EU purely as an economic venture.
They made little effort to talk to people on the ground. They were virtually invisible at grass roots level. Fundamentally Remoaners don’t actually understand the country they live in.
But oddly enough they’ve continued in the same vein since they lost. Hectoring people who don’t agree with them as being thick, focusing totally on economics, boring everyone with endless self interested reports about how terrible Brexit has been for the economy.
It’s almost as if they think that saying the same thing every day for eight years despite people having made clear that they don’t really care somehow means it must be right.
I think there was also a significant degree of personal humiliation for the Remoaners. Overwhelmingly from the metropolitan managerial class they simply weren’t used to anyone saying no to them. They haven’t been able to cope with not getting their way so the country has been subjected to a seven year hissy fit. And they’ve really got no idea why they even wanted to stay in the EU or what’s going on in the EU now. Most of them probably never thought about the EU before 2016. It’s just a high status opinion that compensates for their own social insecurities.
Way to attempt to hijack a thread there right!!!!!
I’m going to go back to talking about trump vs e Jean Carroll part 2 in federal court today…
So how much does his mouth cost him in defamation this time Rog? "Just some more Democrat billionaire funded lawfare. The Democrats know that they can’t beat Trump in a fair fight. Biden won’t budge and they’ve got nobody electable to replace him with anyway. Presumably the plan is for Trump to knock out DeSantis, the courts to knock out Trump, and then they can get RINO Haley in as their Democrat replacement for Biden. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m going to go back to talking about trump vs e Jean Carroll part 2 in federal court today… So how much does his mouth cost him in defamation this time Rog? Her lawyers are asking for $10m. Trump gets to be top news item on every station across the USA, in the run up to an election, for just $10m. Most of the electorate have already made their minds up whether they'll vote for him, or for the other bloke. Trump is targeting the floating voters, and when they get to the voting booth, all they're going to remember is that they've heard a lot about Trump, but nothing about the other guy." She didn’t ask for a figure last time.. and the jury awarded her 8 million The lawyers in the Atlanta defamation case against rudy only asked for 25 million…. And the jury awarded 150 million The problem trump has is that it’s the 2nd case over the same defamation… so if 8 million last time didn’t act as a deterrent so the question is… how much will? Even though the lawyers have only asked for 10…. I would not be surprised if they gave her ….let’s say…. 25 million | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I’m going to go back to talking about trump vs e Jean Carroll part 2 in federal court today… So how much does his mouth cost him in defamation this time Rog? Her lawyers are asking for $10m. Trump gets to be top news item on every station across the USA, in the run up to an election, for just $10m. Most of the electorate have already made their minds up whether they'll vote for him, or for the other bloke. Trump is targeting the floating voters, and when they get to the voting booth, all they're going to remember is that they've heard a lot about Trump, but nothing about the other guy. She didn’t ask for a figure last time.. and the jury awarded her 8 million The lawyers in the Atlanta defamation case against rudy only asked for 25 million…. And the jury awarded 150 million The problem trump has is that it’s the 2nd case over the same defamation… so if 8 million last time didn’t act as a deterrent so the question is… how much will? Even though the lawyers have only asked for 10…. I would not be surprised if they gave her ….let’s say…. 25 million " 25 mill is still good value for the amount of airtime he is getting though | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How do we feel about probity in public office? Moral principles, honesty, decency, that kind of thing? The electorate here and over there don't seem to give a fuck about any of those things." neither do any politicians so why would those who vote be any different | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How do we feel about probity in public office? Moral principles, honesty, decency, that kind of thing? The electorate here and over there don't seem to give a fuck about any of those things.neither do any politicians so why would those who vote be any different" I'm not saying they should give a fuck. But it's their lives being effected by the corrupt self serving politicians. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Never know, the American people might be fed up of starting/being dragged in to every conflict going ... Thankfully, we won't be in that situation at the next General Election
???? true, ifirc the ukip party said the same thing, as in not getting involved etc ... never know, keeping out of conflicts might be popular with ordinary folk
Strategic thinking seems to be a problem for a lot of people these days.
Hence the popularity of people Trump, Farage, Tice and the like.
“Simple politics for simple people.”
Amazing how all the intelligent people can’t win elections.
Not really when the majority are as thick as shit
Surprising how being arrogant snobs isn’t somehow that appealing.
I thought you liked Trump?
I think Remoaners know deep down why they lost. They just don’t want to deal with it so they have been carping on about Russians, aliens, “lies on the side of a bus” for years just to avoid facing what they know is the truth.
What’s the truth Rog? I know it’s out there, according to the X-Files
The truth is....
"Not really when the majority are as thick as shit" attitude. I've said this since day one. "Unfortunately though - it is true. When history education is an option, rather than compulsory, and when children are taught nothing about economics and politics you end up with societies that never learn from past mistakes. It's why as a species we are constantly at war with each other, constantly manufacturing conflicts, and nations constantly find bones to pick with each other. It is very simple. If we sorted the education system out in this country and improved outcomes across the board for all school leavers, as a nation we would not have half as many problems as we do. As long as history, politics and economics are not mandatory in school we will have issues with these people as they get older because they will not be able to contextualise world and political events. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem trump has is that it’s the 2nd case over the same defamation… so if 8 million last time didn’t act as a deterrent so the question is… how much will?" Well this case is about statements he made in 2019, so the deterrent argument doesn't apply. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Absolutely fucking ludicrous. He is found guilty of SA against her, ordered to pay $5m. He launches a tirade disagreeing with the verdict and her account of things, she takes him back to court and she'll be awarded more than the charge for SA. Is it any wonder people laugh at the American 'justice system'?" You missed out a bit…. One was a civil case of SA against trump, and the other was a defamation case against trump that he made against her… and continues to make against her on both TV and social media…. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The problem trump has is that it’s the 2nd case over the same defamation… so if 8 million last time didn’t act as a deterrent so the question is… how much will? Well this case is about statements he made in 2019, so the deterrent argument doesn't apply." He claimed the statements he made were in his capacity as “president of the United States “ and there tried to claim that he had presidential immunity …. (Notice he tries using that argument a lot.. and he hasn’t won one case yet on those grounds) When he lost that argument in court, he then tried to get the DOJ to act as his lawyers against the case as he was “president of the United States” | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a verdict… it’s basically going to be split into 2 sections Compensation damages…. For what he has said .. it will be split into 2.. emotional and reputational Punitive damages.. as a deterrent to stop him from doing it again.. that one could be the big number! " I’m sure he’ll be able to crowdfund it in a few minutes. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a verdict… it’s basically going to be split into 2 sections Compensation damages…. For what he has said .. it will be split into 2.. emotional and reputational Punitive damages.. as a deterrent to stop him from doing it again.. that one could be the big number! " Right…. Compensational damages Emotional damage… 7 million Reputation damage… 11 million Punitive damage…65 million So…. 83 million dollars!!!!! Wow!!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a verdict… it’s basically going to be split into 2 sections Compensation damages…. For what he has said .. it will be split into 2.. emotional and reputational Punitive damages.. as a deterrent to stop him from doing it again.. that one could be the big number! I’m sure he’ll be able to crowdfund it in a few minutes." 83.3 million…plus 5 million from case 1…. 88.3 million down the couch somewhere rog? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a verdict… it’s basically going to be split into 2 sections Compensation damages…. For what he has said .. it will be split into 2.. emotional and reputational Punitive damages.. as a deterrent to stop him from doing it again.. that one could be the big number! I’m sure he’ll be able to crowdfund it in a few minutes. 83.3 million…plus 5 million from case 1…. 88.3 million down the couch somewhere rog? "It’s no problem. Just a few cents each from his global admirers. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is a verdict… it’s basically going to be split into 2 sections Compensation damages…. For what he has said .. it will be split into 2.. emotional and reputational Punitive damages.. as a deterrent to stop him from doing it again.. that one could be the big number! I’m sure he’ll be able to crowdfund it in a few minutes. 83.3 million…plus 5 million from case 1…. 88.3 million down the couch somewhere rog?
It’s no problem. Just a few cents each from his global admirers."Wait! This hugely successful businessman can’t afford to pay himself? Is his “success” paper thin and smoke and mirrors? Hmmmm? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Going to win again? " If he is against Biden then I am afraid he will win, however , its not all bad news, the man is seriously unwell (mentally and physically) so I doubt he will last 4 years | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump loses presidential immunity case… loses unanimously in the federal circuit courts, so looks like SCOTUS probably won’t take it up! In theory the January 6th case which was due to start 4 march, was suspended until further notice last week waiting this decision… so the New York hush money case is now due to be first up.. But… New York may defer their case, so we “could” be looking at this case starting early/mid April if the courts consult each other…" What makes you think SCOTUS won't take it up? Is there precedent? Judge Florence Pan's comment make perfect sense. Tbh, the 'immunity' argument was ridiculous from the start. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump loses presidential immunity case… loses unanimously in the federal circuit courts, so looks like SCOTUS probably won’t take it up! In theory the January 6th case which was due to start 4 march, was suspended until further notice last week waiting this decision… so the New York hush money case is now due to be first up.. But… New York may defer their case, so we “could” be looking at this case starting early/mid April if the courts consult each other… What makes you think SCOTUS won't take it up? Is there precedent? Judge Florence Pan's comment make perfect sense. Tbh, the 'immunity' argument was ridiculous from the start. " Because every judge at every level so far that has dealt with a presidential immunity case in this matter has decided that he doesn’t have it What SCOTUS is there for is to really dispute cases where there are differences in judicial opinions… for example.. whether trump is eligible to be on the ballot (which ironically comes before SCOTUS on Thursday) In this case there has been no judicial differences in opinions at all… in this the verdict on this appeal was 3-0 … with the added layer that any of the other 12 judges on the federal court of appeals could chime in to get the entire court to look at it if they felt strongly enough otherwise… none did! Not only did they say no… they basically gave him 6 days to appeal to SCOTUS, in effect they have sped the process up, after the trump team have been trying to delay delay delay Basically 4 of the Supreme Court judges would need to feel strongly enough that everyone else at the lower court level has got it wrong for it to be looked at | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump loses presidential immunity case… loses unanimously in the federal circuit courts, so looks like SCOTUS probably won’t take it up! In theory the January 6th case which was due to start 4 march, was suspended until further notice last week waiting this decision… so the New York hush money case is now due to be first up.. But… New York may defer their case, so we “could” be looking at this case starting early/mid April if the courts consult each other… What makes you think SCOTUS won't take it up? Is there precedent? Judge Florence Pan's comment make perfect sense. Tbh, the 'immunity' argument was ridiculous from the start. Because every judge at every level so far that has dealt with a presidential immunity case in this matter has decided that he doesn’t have it What SCOTUS is there for is to really dispute cases where there are differences in judicial opinions… for example.. whether trump is eligible to be on the ballot (which ironically comes before SCOTUS on Thursday) In this case there has been no judicial differences in opinions at all… in this the verdict on this appeal was 3-0 … with the added layer that any of the other 12 judges on the federal court of appeals could chime in to get the entire court to look at it if they felt strongly enough otherwise… none did! Not only did they say no… they basically gave him 6 days to appeal to SCOTUS, in effect they have sped the process up, after the trump team have been trying to delay delay delay Basically 4 of the Supreme Court judges would need to feel strongly enough that everyone else at the lower court level has got it wrong for it to be looked at " Thanks for the explanation. Does it matter that conservatives have a majority in SCOTUS? Would that have any sway? This is why judges shouldn't be politically appointed but that another debate. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump loses presidential immunity case… loses unanimously in the federal circuit courts, so looks like SCOTUS probably won’t take it up! In theory the January 6th case which was due to start 4 march, was suspended until further notice last week waiting this decision… so the New York hush money case is now due to be first up.. But… New York may defer their case, so we “could” be looking at this case starting early/mid April if the courts consult each other… What makes you think SCOTUS won't take it up? Is there precedent? Judge Florence Pan's comment make perfect sense. Tbh, the 'immunity' argument was ridiculous from the start. Because every judge at every level so far that has dealt with a presidential immunity case in this matter has decided that he doesn’t have it What SCOTUS is there for is to really dispute cases where there are differences in judicial opinions… for example.. whether trump is eligible to be on the ballot (which ironically comes before SCOTUS on Thursday) In this case there has been no judicial differences in opinions at all… in this the verdict on this appeal was 3-0 … with the added layer that any of the other 12 judges on the federal court of appeals could chime in to get the entire court to look at it if they felt strongly enough otherwise… none did! Not only did they say no… they basically gave him 6 days to appeal to SCOTUS, in effect they have sped the process up, after the trump team have been trying to delay delay delay Basically 4 of the Supreme Court judges would need to feel strongly enough that everyone else at the lower court level has got it wrong for it to be looked at Thanks for the explanation. Does it matter that conservatives have a majority in SCOTUS? Would that have any sway? This is why judges shouldn't be politically appointed but that another debate. " It really shouldn’t as the judges are supposed to be apolitical as such, however trump is relying on the fact he nominated 3 of the 9… Even in this case, on the 3 judge panel, 2 of the judges were nominated by Obama and one nominated by Bush | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Trump loses presidential immunity case… loses unanimously in the federal circuit courts, so looks like SCOTUS probably won’t take it up! In theory the January 6th case which was due to start 4 march, was suspended until further notice last week waiting this decision… so the New York hush money case is now due to be first up.. But… New York may defer their case, so we “could” be looking at this case starting early/mid April if the courts consult each other… What makes you think SCOTUS won't take it up? Is there precedent? Judge Florence Pan's comment make perfect sense. Tbh, the 'immunity' argument was ridiculous from the start. Because every judge at every level so far that has dealt with a presidential immunity case in this matter has decided that he doesn’t have it What SCOTUS is there for is to really dispute cases where there are differences in judicial opinions… for example.. whether trump is eligible to be on the ballot (which ironically comes before SCOTUS on Thursday) In this case there has been no judicial differences in opinions at all… in this the verdict on this appeal was 3-0 … with the added layer that any of the other 12 judges on the federal court of appeals could chime in to get the entire court to look at it if they felt strongly enough otherwise… none did! Not only did they say no… they basically gave him 6 days to appeal to SCOTUS, in effect they have sped the process up, after the trump team have been trying to delay delay delay Basically 4 of the Supreme Court judges would need to feel strongly enough that everyone else at the lower court level has got it wrong for it to be looked at Thanks for the explanation. Does it matter that conservatives have a majority in SCOTUS? Would that have any sway? This is why judges shouldn't be politically appointed but that another debate. It really shouldn’t as the judges are supposed to be apolitical as such, however trump is relying on the fact he nominated 3 of the 9… Even in this case, on the 3 judge panel, 2 of the judges were nominated by Obama and one nominated by Bush " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
