FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Politics

50,000 new/extra nurses

Jump to newest
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough

The govt promised this.

And apparently have delivered on this.

The govt have purloined nurses from red list countries (ethically "illegal" = amoral).

Sadly they haven't retained nursing staff, attrition rates are up. Last year there were around 48,000 NHS England vacancies. Now there are around 44,000. Oddly enough the figure was in excess of 40,000 prior to the promise.

Is attrition THAT awful? OR is someone fudging the figures?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
50 weeks ago

Gilfach


"The govt promised this.

And apparently have delivered on this.

The govt have purloined nurses from red list countries (ethically "illegal" = amoral).

Sadly they haven't retained nursing staff, attrition rates are up. Last year there were around 48,000 NHS England vacancies. Now there are around 44,000. Oddly enough the figure was in excess of 40,000 prior to the promise.

Is attrition THAT awful? OR is someone fudging the figures?"

Attrition rates aren't that awful. The number of NHS staff grows by about 3.5% every year. The problem is that the demand for NHS services is climbing nearly as fast as new staff are being recruited.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough

[Removed by poster at 11/12/23 06:14:53]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"The govt promised this.

And apparently have delivered on this.

The govt have purloined nurses from red list countries (ethically "illegal" = amoral).

Sadly they haven't retained nursing staff, attrition rates are up. Last year there were around 48,000 NHS England vacancies. Now there are around 44,000. Oddly enough the figure was in excess of 40,000 prior to the promise.

Is attrition THAT awful? OR is someone fudging the figures?

Attrition rates aren't that awful. The number of NHS staff grows by about 3.5% every year. The problem is that the demand for NHS services is climbing nearly as fast as new staff are being recruited."

Attrition is awful.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rDiscretionXXXMan
50 weeks ago

Gilfach


"The govt promised this.

And apparently have delivered on this.

The govt have purloined nurses from red list countries (ethically "illegal" = amoral).

Sadly they haven't retained nursing staff, attrition rates are up. Last year there were around 48,000 NHS England vacancies. Now there are around 44,000. Oddly enough the figure was in excess of 40,000 prior to the promise.

Is attrition THAT awful? OR is someone fudging the figures?"


"Attrition rates aren't that awful. The number of NHS staff grows by about 3.5% every year. The problem is that the demand for NHS services is climbing nearly as fast as new staff are being recruited."


"Attrition is awful."

But it's not *that* awful, which is what you asked.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ools and the brainCouple
50 weeks ago

couple, us we him her.

They've been fudging the figures to make it look like they have recruited more nurses.

In fact in lot's of cases all they have done is changed job description and given an amount of training which is just barely enough to call those people a nurse,in many cases the training falls very short of the person being an actual nurse.

Most de skill very quickly due to the volume of admin work involved these days spending less and less time with hand's on duties.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allySlinkyWoman
50 weeks ago

Leeds

I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edcar manMan
50 weeks ago

redcar

Never trust a Tory x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *edcar manMan
50 weeks ago

redcar

And people believed the big red bus x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
50 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election"

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
50 weeks ago

golden fields


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet. "

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
50 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?"

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
50 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

"

I would also never trust anyone who can't divide 50K by 40, you will lose your shirt..

I will correct myself 1250 nurses in each hospital, we need more hospitals to house them all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"They've been fudging the figures to make it look like they have recruited more nurses.

In fact in lot's of cases all they have done is changed job description and given an amount of training which is just barely enough to call those people a nurse,in many cases the training falls very short of the person being an actual nurse.

Most de skill very quickly due to the volume of admin work involved these days spending less and less time with hand's on duties."

You're probably thinking of nursing associates. Nursing associates do a two year degree, they are not nurses. Nurses do a three year degree that should be four years like the majority of countries do. Condensing 4 years into 3 causes high attrition of students.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election"

They'll blame RAAC.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"And people believed the big red bus x"

Those of us with common sense didn't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

I would also never trust anyone who can't divide 50K by 40, you will lose your shirt..

I will correct myself 1250 nurses in each hospital, we need more hospitals to house them all. "

No your first calculation is ok - cos community and GP practices need nurses

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"The govt promised this.

And apparently have delivered on this.

The govt have purloined nurses from red list countries (ethically "illegal" = amoral).

Sadly they haven't retained nursing staff, attrition rates are up. Last year there were around 48,000 NHS England vacancies. Now there are around 44,000. Oddly enough the figure was in excess of 40,000 prior to the promise.

Is attrition THAT awful? OR is someone fudging the figures?

Attrition rates aren't that awful. The number of NHS staff grows by about 3.5% every year. The problem is that the demand for NHS services is climbing nearly as fast as new staff are being recruited."

I'll try look at the numbers tomorrow.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
50 weeks ago

golden fields


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

"

I googled "is the government building 40 new hospitals"

The top link was a sky news article from July. Doesn't look good.

"Only 32 of 40 new hospitals promised by Boris Johnson to be built by 2030 - and some may be too small, audit suggests"

Still, as any sane person would, I believe in the integrity of the Tories and I am certain they'll pull this off.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

I googled "is the government building 40 new hospitals"

The top link was a sky news article from July. Doesn't look good.

"Only 32 of 40 new hospitals promised by Boris Johnson to be built by 2030 - and some may be too small, audit suggests"

Still, as any sane person would, I believe in the integrity of the Tories and I am certain they'll pull this off.

"

Small ones, hmmm, animal hospitals? Toys' hospitals?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
50 weeks ago

Hastings


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

I would also never trust anyone who can't divide 50K by 40, you will lose your shirt..

I will correct myself 1250 nurses in each hospital, we need more hospitals to house them all.

No your first calculation is ok - cos community and GP practices need nurses "

So do care homes and other places

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

I would also never trust anyone who can't divide 50K by 40, you will lose your shirt..

I will correct myself 1250 nurses in each hospital, we need more hospitals to house them all.

No your first calculation is ok - cos community and GP practices need nurses

So do care homes and other places "

We're discussing NHS nurses.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

I would also never trust anyone who can't divide 50K by 40, you will lose your shirt..

I will correct myself 1250 nurses in each hospital, we need more hospitals to house them all.

No your first calculation is ok - cos community and GP practices need nurses

So do care homes and other places

We're discussing NHS nurses."

I shouldn't have included GP practices but shhhhh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eroy1000Man
50 weeks ago

milton keynes


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

"

Underway possibly or even probably but they won't be in power to take the credit when (if) they get completed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
50 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

I googled "is the government building 40 new hospitals"

The top link was a sky news article from July. Doesn't look good.

"Only 32 of 40 new hospitals promised by Boris Johnson to be built by 2030 - and some may be too small, audit suggests"

Still, as any sane person would, I believe in the integrity of the Tories and I am certain they'll pull this off.

"

You are always looking on the downside... Try thinking positive, I'm sure we will have 32 brand new hospitals, gold plated services right down to parking and food, highly trained staff, no waiting times and state of the art medicines and equipment by 2030.

If we don't we will only have Labour to blame

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

I googled "is the government building 40 new hospitals"

The top link was a sky news article from July. Doesn't look good.

"Only 32 of 40 new hospitals promised by Boris Johnson to be built by 2030 - and some may be too small, audit suggests"

Still, as any sane person would, I believe in the integrity of the Tories and I am certain they'll pull this off.

You are always looking on the downside... Try thinking positive, I'm sure we will have 32 brand new hospitals, gold plated services right down to parking and food, highly trained staff, no waiting times and state of the art medicines and equipment by 2030.

If we don't we will only have Labour to blame "

You'll want Labour to part the dead sea next

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ostindreamsMan
50 weeks ago

London

I wonder how the number of NHS personnel per capita in UK compares to other European countries

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
50 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"The govt promised this.

And apparently have delivered on this.

The govt have purloined nurses from red list countries (ethically "illegal" = amoral).

Sadly they haven't retained nursing staff, attrition rates are up. Last year there were around 48,000 NHS England vacancies. Now there are around 44,000. Oddly enough the figure was in excess of 40,000 prior to the promise.

Is attrition THAT awful? OR is someone fudging the figures?"

A bit of the above… people talk about people poaching nurses from red list countries…

Do we have the same criticism for, for example, Australia, New Zealand, the UAE and the US who all actively recruit UK nurses?

Part of the problem is that you also need a significant rise in student nursing places which will take time to feed through the system… same with doctors bearin in mind it takes 7 years to qualify it was never a problem that was going to be solved overnight

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"The govt promised this.

And apparently have delivered on this.

The govt have purloined nurses from red list countries (ethically "illegal" = amoral).

Sadly they haven't retained nursing staff, attrition rates are up. Last year there were around 48,000 NHS England vacancies. Now there are around 44,000. Oddly enough the figure was in excess of 40,000 prior to the promise.

Is attrition THAT awful? OR is someone fudging the figures?

A bit of the above… people talk about people poaching nurses from red list countries…

Do we have the same criticism for, for example, Australia, New Zealand, the UAE and the US who all actively recruit UK nurses?

Part of the problem is that you also need a significant rise in student nursing places which will take time to feed through the system… same with doctors bearin in mind it takes 7 years to qualify it was never a problem that was going to be solved overnight "

Crisis of nursing numbers has been over two decades minimum.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *idnight RamblerMan
50 weeks ago

Pershore

We have to step back and ask is this a nursing shortage or organisational shortcomings? In my experience the NHS is inefficient, bureaucratic with no clue how to run a modern, efficient business (because that's what healthcare is, a business). You might say "health is special" but remember it's not Doctors and Nurses doing pioneering research on drugs and medical devices - it's scientists and engineers working in private industry.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough

World Health Organisation Workforce Support and Safeguard List, 2023,

I assume the UK isn't on that list Fabio.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"We have to step back and ask is this a nursing shortage or organisational shortcomings? In my experience the NHS is inefficient, bureaucratic with no clue how to run a modern, efficient business (because that's what healthcare is, a business). You might say "health is special" but remember it's not Doctors and Nurses doing pioneering research on drugs and medical devices - it's scientists and engineers working in private industry."

Look at Hinchingbrooke Hospital. It was run as a business (a pilot). It was unsuccessful. Circle withdrew from its 10 year contract after only three years.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *idnight RamblerMan
50 weeks ago

Pershore


"We have to step back and ask is this a nursing shortage or organisational shortcomings? In my experience the NHS is inefficient, bureaucratic with no clue how to run a modern, efficient business (because that's what healthcare is, a business). You might say "health is special" but remember it's not Doctors and Nurses doing pioneering research on drugs and medical devices - it's scientists and engineers working in private industry.

Look at Hinchingbrooke Hospital. It was run as a business (a pilot). It was unsuccessful. Circle withdrew from its 10 year contract after only three years."

No idea what went wrong there, but private healthcare works exceptionally well across the globe. Medicine is put on a pedestal in the UK, but it's just transactional like any other service.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uddy laneMan
50 weeks ago

dudley

The nurses are there, the problem is they can earn more on agency and therefore not registered nhs staff, the funds are there they are not being managed correctly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough

Between 2016 and 2020 the devolved nations passed legislation for safe staffing.

With continued high vacancies for nurses, is it no wonder there is no legislation to protect nurses in NHS England. Yet some want to think it's down to poor organisation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"The nurses are there, the problem is they can earn more on agency and therefore not registered nhs staff, the funds are there they are not being managed correctly. "

No the nurses aren't there. The fact there are so many vacancies proves the funds are there = it's not about managing those funds! Most Trusts have bank staff, IE employed by the NHS. Agency use is frowned upon.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough

To prove how small a pool of nurses there are (compared to what's available), both NHS employers and private employers are bribing staff to join them, giving extra payments at 6 months and 12 months in the first year.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uddy laneMan
50 weeks ago

dudley


"The nurses are there, the problem is they can earn more on agency and therefore not registered nhs staff, the funds are there they are not being managed correctly.

No the nurses aren't there. The fact there are so many vacancies proves the funds are there = it's not about managing those funds! Most Trusts have bank staff, IE employed by the NHS. Agency use is frowned upon."

A friend's wife is on agency weekends 2 12 hour cover and she clears over a grand for a weekend.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnnyTwoNotesMan
50 weeks ago

golden fields


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

I googled "is the government building 40 new hospitals"

The top link was a sky news article from July. Doesn't look good.

"Only 32 of 40 new hospitals promised by Boris Johnson to be built by 2030 - and some may be too small, audit suggests"

Still, as any sane person would, I believe in the integrity of the Tories and I am certain they'll pull this off.

You are always looking on the downside... Try thinking positive, I'm sure we will have 32 brand new hospitals, gold plated services right down to parking and food, highly trained staff, no waiting times and state of the art medicines and equipment by 2030.

If we don't we will only have Labour to blame "

Exactly, it's Labours fault we won't have all 40 hospitals too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"The nurses are there, the problem is they can earn more on agency and therefore not registered nhs staff, the funds are there they are not being managed correctly.

No the nurses aren't there. The fact there are so many vacancies proves the funds are there = it's not about managing those funds! Most Trusts have bank staff, IE employed by the NHS. Agency use is frowned upon.

A friend's wife is on agency weekends 2 12 hour cover and she clears over a grand for a weekend. "

I don't dispute agency nurses are having to be used. Hence the need to fill the vacancies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
50 weeks ago

Central


"We have to step back and ask is this a nursing shortage or organisational shortcomings? In my experience the NHS is inefficient, bureaucratic with no clue how to run a modern, efficient business (because that's what healthcare is, a business). You might say "health is special" but remember it's not Doctors and Nurses doing pioneering research on drugs and medical devices - it's scientists and engineers working in private industry.

Look at Hinchingbrooke Hospital. It was run as a business (a pilot). It was unsuccessful. Circle withdrew from its 10 year contract after only three years.

No idea what went wrong there, but private healthcare works exceptionally well across the globe. Medicine is put on a pedestal in the UK, but it's just transactional like any other service. "

It's hardly exceptional in the USA, where longevity has been below the UK for some years, partly because of its formula.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
50 weeks ago

Hastings


"We have to step back and ask is this a nursing shortage or organisational shortcomings? In my experience the NHS is inefficient, bureaucratic with no clue how to run a modern, efficient business (because that's what healthcare is, a business). You might say "health is special" but remember it's not Doctors and Nurses doing pioneering research on drugs and medical devices - it's scientists and engineers working in private industry.

Look at Hinchingbrooke Hospital. It was run as a business (a pilot). It was unsuccessful. Circle withdrew from its 10 year contract after only three years."

What about PPG they run hospitals in prisons and them for profit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
50 weeks ago

Hastings


"The nurses are there, the problem is they can earn more on agency and therefore not registered nhs staff, the funds are there they are not being managed correctly. "

Dam right an all it's supply and demand why work for less if you can join an agency and do less for more. When the agency tells you the rate is cut you stop working the hospital is short staffed so you get asked to work for more money. Its a bissness like any other.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ove2pleaseseukMan
50 weeks ago

Hastings


"The nurses are there, the problem is they can earn more on agency and therefore not registered nhs staff, the funds are there they are not being managed correctly.

No the nurses aren't there. The fact there are so many vacancies proves the funds are there = it's not about managing those funds! Most Trusts have bank staff, IE employed by the NHS. Agency use is frowned upon.

A friend's wife is on agency weekends 2 12 hour cover and she clears over a grand for a weekend.

I don't dispute agency nurses are having to be used. Hence the need to fill the vacancies."

But how will you fill the gap in nursing when more are joining agency to do less for more. And lots leaving to go over sea where pay and living standards are better.

Where the Wife works even imported nurses are looking at moving over sea and see the NHS as a step to a better life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *otMe66Man
50 weeks ago

Terra Firma


"I'm still waiting for the 40 new hospitals we were promised a the election

We need somewhere to house 50K nurses, 500 in each hospital sounds about right and they still have 6 years and 19 days to complete the build.

Nothing to worry about yet.

Excellent news. Is this well under way?

If I was you I would certainly bet every penny you have on this being underway.

I googled "is the government building 40 new hospitals"

The top link was a sky news article from July. Doesn't look good.

"Only 32 of 40 new hospitals promised by Boris Johnson to be built by 2030 - and some may be too small, audit suggests"

Still, as any sane person would, I believe in the integrity of the Tories and I am certain they'll pull this off.

You are always looking on the downside... Try thinking positive, I'm sure we will have 32 brand new hospitals, gold plated services right down to parking and food, highly trained staff, no waiting times and state of the art medicines and equipment by 2030.

If we don't we will only have Labour to blame

Exactly, it's Labours fault we won't have all 40 hospitals too. "

Slight correction, "it will be".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"We have to step back and ask is this a nursing shortage or organisational shortcomings? In my experience the NHS is inefficient, bureaucratic with no clue how to run a modern, efficient business (because that's what healthcare is, a business). You might say "health is special" but remember it's not Doctors and Nurses doing pioneering research on drugs and medical devices - it's scientists and engineers working in private industry.

Look at Hinchingbrooke Hospital. It was run as a business (a pilot). It was unsuccessful. Circle withdrew from its 10 year contract after only three years.

What about PPG they run hospitals in prisons and them for profit.

"

They don't have hospitals in prisons.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"The nurses are there, the problem is they can earn more on agency and therefore not registered nhs staff, the funds are there they are not being managed correctly.

No the nurses aren't there. The fact there are so many vacancies proves the funds are there = it's not about managing those funds! Most Trusts have bank staff, IE employed by the NHS. Agency use is frowned upon.

A friend's wife is on agency weekends 2 12 hour cover and she clears over a grand for a weekend.

I don't dispute agency nurses are having to be used. Hence the need to fill the vacancies.

But how will you fill the gap in nursing when more are joining agency to do less for more. And lots leaving to go over sea where pay and living standards are better.

Where the Wife works even imported nurses are looking at moving over sea and see the NHS as a step to a better life. "

Many nurses are leaving the profession for more money and less responsibility.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
50 weeks ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"World Health Organisation Workforce Support and Safeguard List, 2023,

I assume the UK isn't on that list Fabio."

I think my point was more that we are short of doctors and nurses to begin with, and those staff are being poached by other countries… it’s not helping our situation

The uk needs staff to begin with.. if we are short of the amount of people we need the length of time it takes to train the issue for example with spaces in teaching hospitals isn’t going to be solved overnight

In fact the amount of spaces in teaching hospitals has been cut back a lot over the last 10-15 years….

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"World Health Organisation Workforce Support and Safeguard List, 2023,

I assume the UK isn't on that list Fabio.

I think my point was more that we are short of doctors and nurses to begin with, and those staff are being poached by other countries… it’s not helping our situation

The uk needs staff to begin with.. if we are short of the amount of people we need the length of time it takes to train the issue for example with spaces in teaching hospitals isn’t going to be solved overnight

In fact the amount of spaces in teaching hospitals has been cut back a lot over the last 10-15 years…."

The point is valid but not from the perspective of others poaching from the UK and "doing wrong" but from the perspective of: what can/should the government do about it.

As for teaching hospital placements, that's not necessary for student nurses. Majority of placements are acute (hospital) but also primary/community/social care areas. Most areas love having a free pair of hands (or pairs) for a set period of time. In exchange for a smattering of support in the student's learning (and a wee financial stipend).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough

Solutions to the continuous shortage of nurses:

1. Stop others poaching our homegrown talent - pay more, put in legislation for safe staffing.

2. Stop the amoral acquisition of international nurses (especially red list countries), remember this has been going on over 20 years - train more, make the course palatable to decrease attrition rates caused by four years condensed into three. Losing around half the numbers of student nurses over three years is an economic travesty. Enshrine in legislation the bursary is not to be removed until vacancies are, say 1% of the workforce.

When the Tory govt gave the NHS an extra 8 billion, it was financed by removal of the nursing bursary.

3. Stop nurses leaving the profession - pay more (degree nurses earning more in retail is mind boggling) and legislate for safe staffing like the devolved nations (IE stop burnout, it's not all about the money), nurses work much more than their paid hours.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough

No. 2 should also be pay more, to tempt higher numbers of students into the profession.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exy_HornyCouple
50 weeks ago

Leigh


"Solutions to the continuous shortage of nurses:

1. Stop others poaching our homegrown talent - pay more, put in legislation for safe staffing.

2. Stop the amoral acquisition of international nurses (especially red list countries), remember this has been going on over 20 years - train more, make the course palatable to decrease attrition rates caused by four years condensed into three. Losing around half the numbers of student nurses over three years is an economic travesty. Enshrine in legislation the bursary is not to be removed until vacancies are, say 1% of the workforce.

When the Tory govt gave the NHS an extra 8 billion, it was financed by removal of the nursing bursary.

3. Stop nurses leaving the profession - pay more (degree nurses earning more in retail is mind boggling) and legislate for safe staffing like the devolved nations (IE stop burnout, it's not all about the money), nurses work much more than their paid hours.

"

Nurses don't necessarily need degrees.

Cost of training and student loans etc. should be written off incrementally over a reasonable period (say 20 years) of working for the NHS. So, work for the NHS for 30 years and no repayments are due.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"Solutions to the continuous shortage of nurses:

1. Stop others poaching our homegrown talent - pay more, put in legislation for safe staffing.

2. Stop the amoral acquisition of international nurses (especially red list countries), remember this has been going on over 20 years - train more, make the course palatable to decrease attrition rates caused by four years condensed into three. Losing around half the numbers of student nurses over three years is an economic travesty. Enshrine in legislation the bursary is not to be removed until vacancies are, say 1% of the workforce.

When the Tory govt gave the NHS an extra 8 billion, it was financed by removal of the nursing bursary.

3. Stop nurses leaving the profession - pay more (degree nurses earning more in retail is mind boggling) and legislate for safe staffing like the devolved nations (IE stop burnout, it's not all about the money), nurses work much more than their paid hours.

Nurses don't necessarily need degrees.

Cost of training and student loans etc. should be written off incrementally over a reasonable period (say 20 years) of working for the NHS. So, work for the NHS for 30 years and no repayments are due."

Critical thinking and evidence based practice means nurses must have degrees. There are supporting staff who don't need degrees. There are existing nurses who don't have degrees. If they want to progress they are encouraged to uplift/convert their diplomas

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"Solutions to the continuous shortage of nurses:

1. Stop others poaching our homegrown talent - pay more, put in legislation for safe staffing.

2. Stop the amoral acquisition of international nurses (especially red list countries), remember this has been going on over 20 years - train more, make the course palatable to decrease attrition rates caused by four years condensed into three. Losing around half the numbers of student nurses over three years is an economic travesty. Enshrine in legislation the bursary is not to be removed until vacancies are, say 1% of the workforce.

When the Tory govt gave the NHS an extra 8 billion, it was financed by removal of the nursing bursary.

3. Stop nurses leaving the profession - pay more (degree nurses earning more in retail is mind boggling) and legislate for safe staffing like the devolved nations (IE stop burnout, it's not all about the money), nurses work much more than their paid hours.

Nurses don't necessarily need degrees.

Cost of training and student loans etc. should be written off incrementally over a reasonable period (say 20 years) of working for the NHS. So, work for the NHS for 30 years and no repayments are due."

If you're suggesting the removal of the bursary, then we might as well steal all our nurses from abroad. Immigration issue? Who cares?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *orleymanMan
50 weeks ago

Leeds


"The govt promised this.

And apparently have delivered on this.

The govt have purloined nurses from red list countries (ethically "illegal" = amoral).

Sadly they haven't retained nursing staff, attrition rates are up. Last year there were around 48,000 NHS England vacancies. Now there are around 44,000. Oddly enough the figure was in excess of 40,000 prior to the promise.

Is attrition THAT awful? OR is someone fudging the figures?"

Don't we have slemthing like 43k new nurses vs 2019?

If job vacancies increase in that time. That doesn't alter the pledge nor the increase.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *exy_HornyCouple
50 weeks ago

Leigh


"Solutions to the continuous shortage of nurses:

1. Stop others poaching our homegrown talent - pay more, put in legislation for safe staffing.

2. Stop the amoral acquisition of international nurses (especially red list countries), remember this has been going on over 20 years - train more, make the course palatable to decrease attrition rates caused by four years condensed into three. Losing around half the numbers of student nurses over three years is an economic travesty. Enshrine in legislation the bursary is not to be removed until vacancies are, say 1% of the workforce.

When the Tory govt gave the NHS an extra 8 billion, it was financed by removal of the nursing bursary.

3. Stop nurses leaving the profession - pay more (degree nurses earning more in retail is mind boggling) and legislate for safe staffing like the devolved nations (IE stop burnout, it's not all about the money), nurses work much more than their paid hours.

Nurses don't necessarily need degrees.

Cost of training and student loans etc. should be written off incrementally over a reasonable period (say 20 years) of working for the NHS. So, work for the NHS for 30 years and no repayments are due.

If you're suggesting the removal of the bursary, then we might as well steal all our nurses from abroad. Immigration issue? Who cares?"

No, I am saying that any loans the nurses have had to take out to cover their training are paid for by the government over a reasonable period as long as the nurse works for the NHS for that period.

Same could apply to all medical professionals.

Still not convinced about the degree issue. Nurse degrees are a relatively recent thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"The govt promised this.

And apparently have delivered on this.

The govt have purloined nurses from red list countries (ethically "illegal" = amoral).

Sadly they haven't retained nursing staff, attrition rates are up. Last year there were around 48,000 NHS England vacancies. Now there are around 44,000. Oddly enough the figure was in excess of 40,000 prior to the promise.

Is attrition THAT awful? OR is someone fudging the figures?

Don't we have slemthing like 43k new nurses vs 2019?

If job vacancies increase in that time. That doesn't alter the pledge nor the increase."

This forum loves spouting the net on certain topics. So you are very well aware new nurses does not purely equate to extra nurses. Attrition is extremely relevant.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough


"Solutions to the continuous shortage of nurses:

1. Stop others poaching our homegrown talent - pay more, put in legislation for safe staffing.

2. Stop the amoral acquisition of international nurses (especially red list countries), remember this has been going on over 20 years - train more, make the course palatable to decrease attrition rates caused by four years condensed into three. Losing around half the numbers of student nurses over three years is an economic travesty. Enshrine in legislation the bursary is not to be removed until vacancies are, say 1% of the workforce.

When the Tory govt gave the NHS an extra 8 billion, it was financed by removal of the nursing bursary.

3. Stop nurses leaving the profession - pay more (degree nurses earning more in retail is mind boggling) and legislate for safe staffing like the devolved nations (IE stop burnout, it's not all about the money), nurses work much more than their paid hours.

Nurses don't necessarily need degrees.

Cost of training and student loans etc. should be written off incrementally over a reasonable period (say 20 years) of working for the NHS. So, work for the NHS for 30 years and no repayments are due.

If you're suggesting the removal of the bursary, then we might as well steal all our nurses from abroad. Immigration issue? Who cares?

No, I am saying that any loans the nurses have had to take out to cover their training are paid for by the government over a reasonable period as long as the nurse works for the NHS for that period.

Same could apply to all medical professionals.

Still not convinced about the degree issue. Nurse degrees are a relatively recent thing."

Diploma was replaced by degree in 2009. There were self-funding students undertaking degrees before then. The majority of countries educate nurses to degree level.

Nursing has changed so very much over the years. Hospital wards see a greater number of acutely ill patients. We have support services to prevent hospital admission and early discharge. The acuity (dependence rating) of individuals are much higher than yesteryear. You need nurse leaders and all degree nurses are taught as such. Long gone are the days nurses help doctors. They are professional equals.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *melie LAL OP   Woman
50 weeks ago

Peterborough

Lucy Letby was struck off the nursing register today.

The only surprise is that it took this long.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top